Experiments on deflection of charged particles using silicon crystals at. Proton Synchrotron (KEK(

Similar documents
The limits of volume reflection in bent crystals

Preparing for a Crystal Experiment Proposal

1,0 0,8. Coefficient 0,6 0,4 0,2

INTRODUCING CHANNELING EFFECT

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

A Study of RHIC Crystal Collimation

Light Source I. Takashi TANAKA (RIKEN SPring-8 Center) Cheiron 2012: Light Source I

Bent crystals as a tool for manipulation of ultra-relativistic electron beams. Institut fur Kernphysik, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz, Germany

Crystal Channeling Radiation and Volume Reflection Experiments at SLAC

A Crystal Routine for Collimation Studies in Circular Proton Accelerators

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Theory English (Official)

PULSE-TO-PULSE TRANSVERSE BEAM EMITTANCE CONTROLLING FOR MLF AND MR IN THE 3-GeV RCS OF J-PARC

Channeling of high-energy particles in a multi-wall nanotube

Simulation of Laser-Compton cooling of electron beams for future linear colliders. Abstract

Measurement of Beam Profile

48 K. B. Korotchenko, Yu. L. Pivovarov, Y. Takabayashi where n is the number of quantum states, L is the normalization length (N = 1 for axial channel

II) Experimental Design

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

Synchrotron Radiation a Tool for Precise Beam Energy Measurements at the ILC

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

CHANNELING IN DIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

How Does It All Work? A Summary of the IDEAS Beamline at the Canadian Light Source

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

Measurement of the n_tof beam profile in the second experimental area (EAR2) using a silicon detector

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION AT THE ONSET OF THE QUANTUM REGIME

Research with Synchrotron Radiation. Part I

Studies of Nanotube Channeling for. Efficient Beam Scraping at Accelerators

Machine-Detector Interface for the CEPC

STATUS OF THE J-PARC FACILITY

Delta undulator magnet: concept and project status

ABSOLUTE AIR-KERMA MEASUREMENT IN A SYNCHROTRON LIGHT BEAM BY IONIZATION FREE-AIR CHAMBER

Challenges of the Beam Delivery System for the future Linear Colliders

NEGATIVE PARTICLE PLANAR AND AXIAL CHANNELING AND CHANNELING COLLIMATION

Characterizations and Diagnostics of Compton Light Source

Accelerators. Acceleration mechanism always electromagnetic Start with what s available: e - or p Significant differences between accelerators of

Polarimetry. POSIPOL 2011 Beijing Peter Schuler (DESY) - Polarimetry

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies

Flux and neutron spectrum measurements in fast neutron irradiation experiments

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

Two Dimensional SR-Interferometer at PETRA III. Artem Novokshonov DESY, Tomsk Polytechnic University

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

S. Guiducci. Table 1 PADME beam from Linac. Energy (MeV) 550. Number of positrons per pulse Pulse length (ns)

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

GEANT4 simulation of the testbeam set-up for the ALFA detector

Status and Results of the UA9 Crystal Collimation Experiment at the CERN-SPS

David Martin High Precision Beamline Alignment at the ESRF IWAA, Grenoble 3-7 October 2016

Ultrafast X-Ray-Matter Interaction and Damage of Inorganic Solids October 10, 2008

Compton Storage Rings

Nonintercepting ODR Diagnostics for Multi-GeV Electron Beams

Polarized electron and positron beams at CEPC

Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons. Project Name LCRD Contact Person William Bugg, University of Tennessee

LECTURE 18. Beam loss and beam emittance growth. Mechanisms for beam loss. Mechanisms for emittance growth and beam loss Beam lifetime:

CRYM: a channeling emulation program based on the latest experimental data

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF A SELF-SEEDING SCHEME AT FLASH2

Feasibility of measuring the magnetic dipole moments of the charm baryons at the LHC using bent crystals

Emittance preserving staging optics for PWFA and LWFA

Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane

Electron Transport Line for Mu2e Calibration System. August 7, Abstract

Differential Cross Section Measurements in Ion-molecule Collisions

Simulation Studies for a Polarimeter at the International Linear Collider (ILC)

ADVANCED PHOTON SOURCES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS

Developments for the FEL user facility

JLEIC forward detector design and performance

Measuring very low emittances using betatron radiation. Nathan Majernik October 19, 2017 FACET-II Science Workshop

J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex)

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

Undulator Commissioning Spectrometer for the European XFEL

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

3. Particle accelerators

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - SL DIVISION. Multi-TeV CLIC Photon Collider Option. H. Burkhardt

JSPS Asien Science Seminar Synchrotron Radiation Science

Experimental study of nonlinear laser-beam Thomson scattering

PoS(PSTP 2013)034. Precession Polarimetry at JLab, 6 GeV. G.B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University

Andreas Kabel Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Coherent Cherenkov radiation from ultra-short electron bunch passing through vacuum channel in conical target

THE SUPER-FRS PROJECT AT GSI

Calibrating the FNAL Booster Ionization Profile Monitor

Measurement of the Proton Beam Polarization with Ultra Thin Carbon Targets at RHIC

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

1.E Neutron Energy (MeV)

K + Physics at J-PARC

Simulation for Proton Charge Radius (PRad) Experiment at Jefferson Lab1 Li Ye Mississippi State University For the PRad Collaboration The Proton Charg

A method to polarise antiprotons in storage rings and create polarised antineutrons

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector tracking system

The Electron-Ion Collider

Theory of electron cooling

CLIC polarized e+ source based on laser Compton scattering


On the future plan of KEK for ILC(International Linear Collider) Junji Urakawa(KEK) Contents

High Energy Channeling and the Experimental Search for the Internal Clock Predicted by L. de Broglie

Emittance and photocathodes

Simulation of J/ψ detection via electron-positron decay

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

High-Resolution Neutron Diffraction Monochromators for Neutron Diffractometry

Electron Spectrometer for FLASHForward Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator

Transcription:

Experiments on deflection of charged particles using silicon crystals at REFER ring (Hiroshima( University) and Proton Synchrotron (KEK( KEK) S. Sawada KEK High Energy Accelerator Research Organization T. Takahashi, I. Endo, M. Iinuma, H. Sato, S. Strokov, K. Ueda Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University H. Kuroiwa, T. Ohnishi Venture Business Laboratory, Hiroshima University V. Biryukov, Yu. Chesnokov Institute for High Energy Physics, Russia

Contents 1. Introduction to the channeling effect 2. Motivation 3. Experiment on electron beam deflection (REFER, Hiroshima University) 4. Experiment on proton beam deflection (Proton Synchrotron, KEK) 5. Conclusion 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 2

Introduction (channeling effect) θ angle of incident particle to the crystallographic plane deflection angle proton atoms of bent straight crystal crystal θ < Lindhard angle Æ channeling effect θ > Lindhard angle Æ no channeling effect 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 3

Motivation Application to deflection of high energy (50 GeV) and high intensity proton beam at J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex): beam splitting in a slow-extraction beam, beam collimator, slow beam extraction from the synchrotron in the future. Collimation of the ultra-low emittance beam at ILC (International Linear Collider). Beam extraction from the REFER ring is within the scope. Beam diagnosis by channeling effect (beam divergence and profile). 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 4

REFER ring @ Hiroshima University REFER (Relativistic Electron Facility for Education and Research) 150 MeV Electron beam QM3 Beam extraction line beam intensity : 1.0 4 1 10 s 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 5

REFER ring @ Hiroshima University 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 6

Experimental setup Extraction line thickness of crystal: 16µm QM3 vacuum: 1.0x10-7 torr QM3: for change of beam divergence 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 7

Extraction line 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 8

Setup MIrror IIT & CCD Goniometer Beam Si crystal Beam 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 9

Schematic view of the setup phosphor Beam profile θ direction <100> axis Si crystal thickness of crystal: 16µm electron beam φ direction beam divergence controlled by QM3 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 10

Experiment: beam divergence Beam divergence vs. QM3 current ( measured beam profile and optics calculation) divergence beam horizontal vertical Beam divergence [ mr ] Beam divergence [ mr ] QM3 current [A] QM3 current [A] Vertical angle dependence of the profile is the point. Lindhard angle for <100> axis of Si : 0.7 mr Beam divergence > Lindhard angle 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 11

Results: Beam Profiles QM3: 2.0A θ = 0, φ = -1.5mr Beam divergence: 3.0 mr QM3: 2.6A θ = 0, φ = -1.5mr Beam divergence: 5.2 mr 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 12

Analysis Beam divergence ( vertical ): 3.0 mr QM3: 2.0 A Fitting with double Gaussian projection σ σ vertical position ( mm ) Beam center weighted average in 2σ region 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 13

Results (1) Beam divergence ( vertical ) : 3.0 mr θ=0 mr (QM3: 2.0 A) Deflection angle change of beam center + 2.34m φ = -2.5 mr Deflection angle [ mr ] φ = -1.5 mr φ = 0 mr φ [ mr ] (Vertical direction of the crystal) 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 14

Results (2) Beam divergence = 3.8 mr θ = 0 mr ( QM3 : 2.2 A ) Deflection angle [mr] φ [ mr ] 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 15

Results (3) Beam divergence : 5.2 mr θ = 0 mr ( QM3 : 2.6 A ) Deflection angle [mr] φ [ mr ] 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 16

Results: deflection vs. beam divergence Deflection vs. beam divergence ( normalized at 3 mr ) 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 Beam divergence [mr] The magnitude of the deflection,, was determined by fitting the plot with 1 st derivative of Gaussian function 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-0.1-0.2-0.3-10 -5 0 5 10 φ [ mr ] Larger beam divergence Smaller deflection 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 17

Simulation Lindhard string continuous potential 2 2Ze U = ln 1+ d Conditions for simulation 3R 2 ρ 4 th order of Runge-Kutta method 2 R : ρ : d : Z : Thomas-Fermi radius Distance from <100> axis lattice constant in <100> axis ( 5.43A for Si) Atomic number ( 14 for Si ) Without consideration of multiple scattering and channeling radiation Energy of electrons : 150 MeV Thickness of the crystal : 16 µm 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 18

Simulation: trajectory Trajectory of an electron Y [A ] Initial position : X=0A,Y=0.3A 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.2 0.0 0.2 X [A ] Y [A ] Initial position: X=0A,Y=0.5A 10 5 0 <100> 軸 -5-5 0 5 10 X [A ] 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 19

Simulation (1) Preliminary results Beam divergence : 3.0 mr Beam divergence : 5.2 mr Deflection angle [mr] φ [ mr ] φ [ mr ] Larger beam divergence Smaller deflection 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 20

Simulation (2) Comparison with experimental data Beam divergence : 3.0 mr ( QM3 : 2.0 A ) Deflection angle [mr] φ [ mr ] φ [ mr ] The tendency of the deflection as a function of the vertical direction of the crystal (φ) is same. But, in quantitative comparison, the peak-to-peak difference of the deflection angle of the measurement is about 0.4 mr, while it s around 0.04 mr for the simulation. 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 21

Simulation (3) Comparison with experimental data Beam divergence : 5.2 mr ( QM3 : 2.6 A ) Deflection angle [mr] φ [ mr ] φ [ mr ] Experimental data agree with simulation qualitatively. Study with more realistic beam profiles etc. is underway. 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 22

Summary Performed experiment on beam deflection at REFER with the150-mev electron beam. Systematic investigation of the beam deflection as a function of the beam divergence. Preliminary comparison with simulation: Qualitative agreements Quantitative comparison being studied 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 23

Prospect Experiment at KEK-ATF (Accelerator Test Facility) E = 1.28 GeV Normalized emittace: ε x = 3.4 x10-6 m, ε y = 4.5x10-8 m Just a similar experiment at ATF as the REFER experiment See channeling effects with the super-low emittance beam. 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 24

Experiment at KEK-PS North counter hall Experiment was done in EP2 line EP2 line 12 GeV Proton Synchrotron East counter hall 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 25

Experimental setup Fluorescence plate p Crystal Al plate CsI plate Fluorescence plates Goniometer ±θ o Distance 145cm ±20 cm 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 26

Crystal, proton beam Parameters of crystal Material: Silicon Size: 3 x 0.3 x 10 mm Bending angle: ~ 32.6 mrad Plane: (111) Lindhard angle: 0.066 mrad Parameters of the proton beam 15mm bending angle, 32.6 mrad Energy: 12 GeV Intensity: 10 12 protons/spill Size: 15 x 12 mm Divergence: < 5 mrad 12mm 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 27

Schematic drawing of the experiment view from above crystal deflection angle CsI plate (5x2.5cm) deflected beam fluorescence plate (10x10cm) bent crystal goniometer main beam 12 GeV protons 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 28

Typical pictures image after background subtraction raw image CsI plate fluorescence plate Deflected beam Primary beam intensity of deflected beam bending angle crystal efficiency 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 29

Results (1) 1.2 position of deflected beam on CsI plate, (mm) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 1450 mm 0.2 0.0-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 angle between crystal and beam axis, (mrad) Such dependence agrees with estimations 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 30

Results (2) N deflected ~10 7 N deflected, (protons) 9x10 7 8x10 7 7x10 7 6x10 7 5x10 7 4x10 7 3x10 7 2x10 7 1x10 7 0-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 angle between crystal and beam axis, (mrad) N beam 10 12 10 12 protons ~ 10 7 deflected protons 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 31

Crystal efficiency N deflected = Crystal Efficiency x Angle Efficiency x N incident upon the crystal. Incident particles within critical (Lindhard) angle to the crystallographic plane. At the beam divergence <5 mrad and Lindhard angle 0.066 mrad, angle efficiency is > 1% Crystal Efficiency could be: 100% at 5 mrad ~ 26% at 1 mrad ~ 13% at 0.5 mrad only small part of all protons hits crystal, that is 0.3% N incident upon the crystal = 3x10 9 N deflected = 4x10 7 protons 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 32

Simulation picture at the distance 145 cm from the crystal Catch code Initial parameters Beam Energy: 12 GeV Size: 15 x 12 mm Divergence: 0.3, 0.5, 1, 5 mrad Crystal Size: ~103 deflected 108 initial 3 x 0.3 x 10 mm Bending angle: ~ 32.6 mrad Plane: (111) 108 protons Æ ~ 103 deflected protons 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 33

Simulation N deflected = Crystal Efficiency x Angle Efficiency x N incident upon the crystal. Crystal Efficiency is 15% 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 34

Simulation vs. Experimental data (1) Position of the deflected beam at the distance 145 cm from the crystal, (mm) experimental data simulation 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0-0.3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 mrad 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 35

Simulation vs. Experimental data (2) 8.0x10 7 5 mrad 8.0x10 7 0.5 mrad 6.0x10 7 6.0x10 7 4.0x10 7 4.0x10 7 2.0x10 7 2.0x10 7 0.0-0.8-0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0-0.8-0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 8.0x10 7 1 mrad 8.0x10 7 0.3 mrad 6.0x10 7 6.0x10 7 4.0x10 7 4.0x10 7 2.0x10 7 2.0x10 7 0.0-0.8-0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0-0.8-0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 36

Crystal efficiency At the beam divergence 0.3-0.5 mrad crystal efficiency in experiment was 8-13% From the simulation it is 15% 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 37

Summary Experiment on the deflection of proton beam by the bent crystal was successfully done. The crystal shows good deflection efficiency which is 8-13%. Performed Monte-Carlo simulation proves the experimental data 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 38

Future projects Next experiment on the channeling of ultra-low emittance electron beam will be performed at KEK-ATF (Autumn, 2006). Participation at the experiment on proton collimation at the Fermilab. Experiment at the REFER ring, Hiroshima University with the 150 MeV electron beam (channeling radiation) Application for the J-PARC 10 July, 2006 Sergey Strokov/ DESY, Hamburg 39