Export Destinations and Input Prices. Appendix A

Similar documents
Export Destinations and Input Prices. Appendix A

2017 Source of Foreign Income Earned By Fund

Parity Reversion of Absolute Purchasing Power Parity Zhi-bai ZHANG 1,a,* and Zhi-cun BIAN 2,b

Do Policy-Related Shocks Affect Real Exchange Rates? An Empirical Analysis Using Sign Restrictions and a Penalty-Function Approach

Supplementary Appendix for. Version: February 3, 2014

Nigerian Capital Importation QUARTER THREE 2016

Bilateral Labour Agreements, 2004

How Well Are Recessions and Recoveries Forecast? Prakash Loungani, Herman Stekler and Natalia Tamirisa

Canadian Imports of Honey

READY TO SCRAP: HOW MANY VESSELS AT DEMOLITION VALUE?

04 June Dim A W V Total. Total Laser Met

Appendix B: Detailed tables showing overall figures by country and measure

Big Data at BBVA Research using BigQuery

USDA Dairy Import License Circular for 2018

Forecast Million Lbs. % Change 1. Carryin August 1, ,677, ,001, % 45.0

PIRLS 2016 INTERNATIONAL RESULTS IN READING

2,152,283. Japan 6,350,859 32,301 6,383,160 58,239, ,790 58,464,425 6,091, ,091,085 52,565, ,420 52,768,905

Forecast Million Lbs. % Change 1. Carryin August 1, ,677, ,001, % 45.0

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing EiC Report

USDA Dairy Import License Circular for 2018

DISTILLED SPIRITS - EXPORTS BY VALUE DECEMBER 2017

Gravity Analysis of Regional Economic Interdependence: In case of Japan

A Prior Distribution of Bayesian Nonparametrics Incorporating Multiple Distances

Governments that have requested pre-export notifications pursuant to article 12, paragraph 10 (a), of the 1988 Convention

OCTOBER Almond Industry Position Report Crop Year /01-10/31 Kernel Wt /01-10/31 Kernel Wt.

Solow model: Convergence

Kernel Wt. 593,190,150 1,218,046,237 1,811,236, ,364, ,826, ,191, Crop Year

USDA Dairy Import License Circular for 2018 Commodity/

Does socio-economic indicator influent ICT variable? II. Method of data collection, Objective and data gathered

CONTINENT WISE ANALYSIS OF ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE PERIODICALS: A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY

International and regional network status

Cyclone Click to go to the page. Cyclone

Corporate Governance, and the Returns on Investment

DISTILLED SPIRITS - IMPORTS BY VALUE DECEMBER 2017

DISTILLED SPIRITS - IMPORTS BY VOLUME DECEMBER 2017

About the Authors Geography and Tourism: The Attraction of Place p. 1 The Elements of Geography p. 2 Themes of Geography p. 4 Location: The Where of

North-South Gap Mapping Assignment Country Classification / Statistical Analysis

Quick Guide QUICK GUIDE. Activity 1: Determine the Reaction Rate in the Presence or Absence of an Enzyme

ICC Rev August 2010 Original: English. Agreement. International Coffee Council 105 th Session September 2010 London, England

TIMSS 2011 The TIMSS 2011 Instruction to Engage Students in Learning Scale, Fourth Grade

International Student Enrollment Fall 2018 By CIP Code, Country of Citizenship, and Education Level Harpur College of Arts and Sciences

Bahrain, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Qatar and Sudan.

A COMPREHENSIVE WORLDWIDE WEB-BASED WEATHER RADAR DATABASE

TIMSS 2011 The TIMSS 2011 Teacher Career Satisfaction Scale, Fourth Grade

Global Data Catalog initiative Christophe Charpentier ArcGIS Content Product Manager

Publication Date: 15 Jan 2015 Effective Date: 12 Jan 2015 Addendum 6 to the CRI Technical Report (Version: 2014, Update 1)

Country of Citizenship, College-Wide - All Students, Fall 2014

Learning Objectives. Math Chapter 3. Chapter 3. Association. Response and Explanatory Variables

2001 Environmental Sustainability Index

TIGER: Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery By Eswar Prasad and Karim Foda

GLOBAL INFORMATION PROCESS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY AND MOLDAVIAN ELECTROCHEMICAL SCHOOL. SCIENCEMETRIC ANALYSIS

TIMSS 2011 The TIMSS 2011 School Discipline and Safety Scale, Fourth Grade

TIGER: Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery By Eswar Prasad, Karim Foda, and Ethan Wu

DESKTOP STUDY ON GLOBAL IMPORTS OF HANDMADE CARPETS & FLOOR COVERINGS AT A GLANCE

International Student Achievement in Mathematics

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

AD HOC DRAFTING GROUP ON TRANSNATIONAL ORGANISED CRIME (PC-GR-COT) STATUS OF RATIFICATIONS BY COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEMBER STATES

PARTICIPATION IN IEA TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION PROGRAMMES (TCPs)

From Argentina to Zimbabwe: Where Should I Sell my Widgets?

Office of Budget & Planning 311 Thomas Boyd Hall Baton Rouge, LA Telephone 225/ Fax 225/

ˆ GDP t = GDP t SCAN t (1) t stat : (3.71) (5.53) (3.27) AdjustedR 2 : 0.652

Communication Manager values configured by the MBT Installation Wizard. November Issue Number:1

PIRLS 2011 The PIRLS 2011 Safe and Orderly School Scale

PRECURSORS. Pseudoephedrine preparations 3,4-MDP-2-P a P-2-P b. Ephedrine

protein interaction analysis bulletin 6300

United Nations Environment Programme

Calories, Obesity and Health in OECD Countries

Trends in Human Development Index of European Union

Lecture 2: Intermediate macroeconomics, autumn Lars Calmfors

The trade dispute between the US and China Who wins? Who loses?

Scaling outcomes. Results of the IRT scaling and population modeling Transforming the plausible values to PISA scales...

The Outer Space Legal Regime and UN Register of Space Objects

Government Size and Economic Growth: A new Framework and Some Evidence from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data

Sustainability of balancing item of balance of payment for OECD countries: evidence from Fourier Unit Root Tests

Online Appendix of the paper " How does sovereign bond market integration relate to fundamentals and CDS spreads?"

PIRLS 2011 The PIRLS 2011 Teacher Career Satisfaction Scale

How Well Do Economists Forecast Recessions?

Forecast Million Lbs. % Change 1. Carryin August 1, ,677, ,001, % 74,668,896 81,673, ,342,305

Census 2004 Summary. Membership

International Standardization for Measurement and Characterization of Nanomaterials

Additional VEX Worlds 2019 Spot Allocations

United Nations Environment Programme

ia PU BLi s g C o M Pa K T Wa i n CD-1576

Radiation Protection Procedures

2006 Supplemental Tax Information for JennisonDryden and Strategic Partners Funds

PIRLS International Report PIRLS. Chapter 2

The Information Content of Capacity Utilisation Rates for Output Gap Estimates

PIRLS 2011 The PIRLS 2011 Teacher Working Conditions Scale

W o r l d O i l a n d G a s R e v i e w

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY SCREENING APPLICATION SOLUTION

A Novel Global Equity Index for Spatial Correlation Analysis

A Perfect Specialization Model for Gravity Equation in Bilateral Trade based on Production Structure

Trade costs in bilateral trade flows: Heterogeneity and zeroes in structural gravity models

Demography, Time and Space

Forecast Million Lbs. % Change 1. Carryin August 1, ,677, ,001, % 37,917,625 42,897,816 80,815,441

PIRLS 2011 The PIRLS 2011 Students Motivated to Read Scale

Lecture 2: Intermediate macroeconomics, autumn Lars Calmfors

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund

PIRLS 2011 The PIRLS 2011 Students Engaged in Reading Lessons Scale

Chapter 9.D Services Trade Data

Transcription:

Export Destinations and Input Prices Paulo Bastos Joana Silva Eric Verhoogen Jan. 2016 Appendix A For Online Publication

Figure A1. Real Exchange Rate, Selected Richer Export Destinations UK USA Sweden Switzerland Norway Japan ɛ Notes: Real exchange rate calculated as hkt CP I ht /CP I kt, where ɛ hkt is the nominal exchange rate (defined as units of home (h) currency per unit of currency in destination k). (Refer to equation (19).) Given this definition, an increase reflects a real appreciation in the destination relative to Portugal. Real exchange rate normalized to 100 in 1997.

Figure A2. Real Exchange Rate, Selected Poorer Export Destinations Brazil Angola Turkey Morocco Hungary Russia ɛ Notes: Real exchange rate calculated as hkt CP I ht /CP I kt, where ɛ hkt is the nominal exchange rate (defined as units of home (h) currency per unit of currency in destination k). (Refer to equation (19).) Given this definition, an increase reflects a real appreciation in the destination relative to Portugal. Real exchange rate normalized to 100 in 1997.

Figure A3. Differences Between Initial Sets of Export Destinations and Source Countries avg. number of source countries 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 number of export destinations fraction of sample 0.05.1.15.2.25.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 number of export destinations Notes: The top panel illustrates the average number of source countries (hollow bars) and average number of source countries that are also destinations (gray bars), for each number of destinations. The line is a 45-degree line. The bottom panel is a histogram of the number of export destinations. Sample is firms in the baseline estimation sample in 1997 with positive exports to one or more of top 100 non-euro-zone destinations. Number of export destinations refers to non-euro-zone destinations and is top-coded at 40; fewer than.1% of firms are above the top-code.

Table A1. Summary statistics, exports and imports, 1997 export rank all exports export share estimation sample import rank all imports import share estimation sample Germany 1 0.217 0.211 2 0.208 0.210 Spain 2 0.145 0.150 1 0.219 0.226 France 3 0.144 0.151 3 0.116 0.121 United Kingdom 4 0.125 0.130 4 0.070 0.073 Netherlands 5 0.055 0.054 6 0.038 0.040 Belgium-Luxemburg 6 0.052 0.052 8 0.029 0.029 United States 7 0.044 0.038 9 0.029 0.025 Italy 8 0.039 0.039 5 0.061 0.063 Sweden 9 0.020 0.019 13 0.009 0.007 Denmark 10 0.017 0.018 17 0.008 0.007 Austria 11 0.013 0.013 15 0.008 0.008 Switzerland 12 0.011 0.011 16 0.008 0.008 Brazil 13 0.009 0.009 10 0.026 0.026 Norway 14 0.008 0.008 11 0.012 0.012 Japan 15 0.007 0.005 7 0.034 0.029 Finland 16 0.007 0.007 18 0.007 0.007 Angola 17 0.006 0.007 34 0.002 0.000 Greece 18 0.005 0.005 41 0.001 0.002 Singapore 19 0.005 0.002 28 0.003 0.001 Israel 20 0.005 0.005 43 0.001 0.001 Turkey 21 0.005 0.005 22 0.003 0.003 Ireland 22 0.004 0.004 20 0.004 0.004 Australia 23 0.004 0.004 83 0.000 0.000 Canada 24 0.004 0.004 31 0.003 0.003 Morocco 25 0.004 0.004 29 0.003 0.003 Hungary 26 0.003 0.003 94 0.000 0.000 Russia 27 0.003 0.004 14 0.008 0.009 South Africa 28 0.003 0.003 21 0.004 0.004 Chile 29 0.002 0.003 66 0.001 0.001 Hong Kong 30 0.002 0.002 65 0.001 0.001 Poland 31 0.002 0.002 52 0.001 0.001 Cape Verde 32 0.002 0.002 64 0.001 0.001 China 33 0.002 0.002 26 0.003 0.003 Saudi Arabia 34 0.002 0.001 91 0.000 0.000 Argentina 35 0.002 0.002 60 0.001 0.001 Tunisia 36 0.001 0.001 38 0.002 0.002 Korea 37 0.001 0.001 12 0.011 0.001 Czech Republic 38 0.001 0.001 56 0.001 0.001 Algeria 39 0.001 0.001 88 0.000 0.000 Mexico 40 0.001 0.001 68 0.001 0.001 Mozambique 41 0.001 0.001 50 0.001 0.001 Thailand 42 0.001 0.001 37 0.002 0.002 Guinea-Bissau 43 0.001 0.001 117 0.000 0.000 Panama 44 0.001 0.000 110 0.000 0.000 Venezuela 45 0.001 0.001 77 0.000 0.000 India 46 0.001 0.001 19 0.005 0.006 Egypt 47 0.001 0.001 44 0.001 0.001 Cyprus 48 0.001 0.001 120 0.000 0.000 New Zealand 49 0.001 0.001 78 0.000 0.000 Slovak Republic 50 0.001 0.001 105 0.000 0.000 Total (bil. euros) 16.05 14.86 11.89 11.03 Notes: Table reports export shares by destination for all exporters (Column 2) and our estimation sample (Column 3) and import share by source country for all importers (Column 5) and our estimation sample (Column 6). Final row reports total exports for all destinations and total imports from all sources. Countries poorer than Portugal (in 1996 GDP/capita) appear in italics. Export and import ranks based on all exports and all imports, respectively (i.e. not the estimation sample). Petroleum exports and imports excluded. Euro-zone countries included.

Table A2. Summary statistics, baseline estimation sample, 1997-2005 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 sales 5.57 5.45 5.18 4.97 5.04 7.36 6.91 9.86 9.35 (0.51) (0.44) (0.45) (0.46) (0.50) (0.67) (0.61) (0.79) (0.70) number of output categories 4.51 4.52 4.51 4.53 4.47 5.93 6.04 3.89 3.82 (0.07) (0.07) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.17) (0.17) (0.09) (0.09) export share of sales 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.24 0.24 (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) share of exports to richer countries 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.76 0.75 0.79 0.78 (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) number of destination countries 7.71 7.53 7.53 7.53 7.50 7.32 7.15 8.85 8.94 (0.15) (0.14) (0.14) (0.14) (0.15) (0.33) (0.30) (0.27) (0.27) number of export categories 10.03 9.89 9.88 9.86 10.02 9.76 9.39 13.04 13.77 (0.28) (0.26) (0.26) (0.25) (0.27) (0.72) (0.61) (0.56) (0.59) avg. income of destination 11.62 11.63 11.60 11.48 11.41 10.73 10.69 11.46 11.36 (0.05) (0.05) (0.05) (0.05) (0.04) (0.07) (0.06) (0.07) (0.07) purchases 3.24 3.09 2.91 2.87 2.92 4.19 3.70 5.49 5.12 (0.43) (0.35) (0.36) (0.43) (0.42) (0.37) (0.32) (0.55) (0.47) number of input categories 7.70 8.12 8.44 8.78 8.90 7.05 7.18 7.75 7.87 (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.14) (0.14) (0.15) (0.15) import share of purchases 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.27 (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) share of imports from richer countries 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.87 0.87 (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) number of source countries 5.63 5.65 5.65 5.58 5.56 5.34 5.21 6.78 6.83 (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.18) (0.17) (0.14) (0.14) number of import categories 21.74 21.70 21.94 22.00 21.61 20.06 20.60 29.41 31.04 (0.65) (0.64) (0.61) (0.59) (0.59) (1.19) (1.51) (1.28) (1.33) average income of source 10.87 10.88 10.89 10.81 10.68 10.55 10.51 11.17 11.07 (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.06) (0.05) (0.06) (0.06) fraction exporter 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.46 0.59 0.60 fraction importer 0.50 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.60 0.59 N (firms) 6585 6873 7194 7713 7994 2046 2160 2455 2639 Notes: Table reports averages across firms, weighting firms equally. Average income of sales destination and purchase sources include the home market as possible destination or source, as described in Section 4 of the text. Sales and purchases are in millions of 2000 Euros, avg. incomes of destination and source in thousands of 2000 Euros.

Table A3. Destination characteristics and export prices in cross section, 1997 dep. var.: firm-product log export price (1) (2) (3) (4) richer than Portugal 0.09*** 0.11*** (0.03) (0.03) log GDP/cap. 0.03** 0.03*** (0.01) (0.01) log GDP 0.01 0.00 0.01-0.00 (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.01) European Union 0.06** 0.03 0.07*** 0.04 (0.03) (0.02) (0.03) (0.03) landlocked -0.02 0.03-0.05 0.01 (0.04) (0.05) (0.04) (0.06) log distance 0.05*** 0.04*** 0.06*** 0.04*** (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) product effects Y N Y N firm-product effects N Y N Y R2 0.73 0.94 0.73 0.94 N 35438 35438 35438 35438 Notes: Sample is all firm-product-destination observations in 1997 for firms in baseline estimation sample, excluding Euro-zone destinations and petroleum exports. Results when including Euro-zone destinations are similar (see Appendix Table 3). Richer than Portugal defined using 1996 GDP/capita, consistent with our use of 1996 values elsewhere; log GDP/cap. variable is from 1997. Price data have been winsorized as described in Section 3. Robust standard errors, clustered by destination, in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A4. Source-country characteristics and import prices in cross section, 1997 dep. var.: firm-product log import price (1) (2) (3) (4) richer than Portugal 0.58*** 0.33*** (0.11) (0.10) log GDP/cap. 0.23*** 0.13*** (0.03) (0.03) log GDP 0.08*** 0.03 0.06*** 0.02 (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) European Union -0.34*** -0.16-0.30*** -0.15 (0.12) (0.13) (0.08) (0.10) landlocked 0.20*** 0.02 0.14*** -0.00 (0.06) (0.07) (0.04) (0.06) log distance 0.02 0.07-0.01 0.06 (0.05) (0.06) (0.03) (0.05) product effects Y N Y N firm-product effects N Y N Y R2 0.68 0.94 0.68 0.94 N 99365 99365 99365 99365 Notes: Sample is all firm-product-source observations in 1997 for firms in baseline estimation sample. Euro-zone origins included, petroleum imports excluded. Richer than Portugal defined using 1996 GDP/capita, consistent with our use of 1996 values elsewhere; log GDP/cap. variable is from 1997. Robust standard errors, clustered by source country, in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A5. Destination income and firm average input prices, LIML estimates dep. var.: firm-average log real input price (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.99*** 1.16*** 1.18*** 1.15*** 1.16** 0.96** (0.33) (0.43) (0.44) (0.44) (0.51) (0.48) export share of sales -0.56*** -0.57** -0.56** -0.58-0.47 (0.22) (0.23) (0.23) (0.71) (0.68) log avg. destination distance -0.00-0.00 0.00 0.25** (0.00) (0.00) (0.02) (0.12) log sales 0.02** 0.02** -0.01 (0.01) (0.01) (0.02) initial source interactions Y Y Y Y Y Y firm effects Y Y Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y Y Y N 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 264.22 250.03 249.61 248.92 192.30 232.20 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 3.11 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.09 2.32 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 2.20 2.19 2.19 2.17 2.18 2.18 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Instruments are interactions of indicators for positive exports to destination in 1997 and log real-exchange rate for Portugal s top 100 non-eurozone export destinations. Initial source interactions, included directly as covariates, are defined analogously to the instruments, using indicators for initial imports. Columns 1 to 4 treat only log avg. destination GDP/cap as endogenous; Column 5 adds export share of sales, and Column 6 adds log avg. destination distance to endogenous set. Destination gdp/cap measured in 1996. Petroleum exports and imports excluded. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A6. IV estimates, input prices, excluding richest destinations from instrument set dep. var.: firm-average log real input price excluding from instrument set the richest 5 dest. 10 dest. 15 dest. 20 dest. 25 dest. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.65** 0.77*** 0.69** 0.69*** 0.58** (0.26) (0.27) (0.27) (0.26) (0.29) export share of sales -0.29-0.13-0.01-0.15-0.14 (0.31) (0.32) (0.33) (0.33) (0.34) log avg. destination distance 0.06** 0.07*** 0.06** 0.05** 0.05* (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) log sales 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) initial source interactions Y Y Y Y Y firm effects Y Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y Y N 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 239.67 161.92 162.20 148.72 139.61 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 2.51 1.96 2.04 1.92 2.00 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 2.28 2.34 2.37 2.24 2.16 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Specifications are similar to Table 6 Column 6, but excluding subsets of the richest destinations from instrument set. Column 1 excludes the 5 richest non-euro-zone countries, leaving the other 95 destinations in the instrument set, and similarly for the other columns. First-stage results in Appendix Tables B5-B9. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A7. IV estimates, input prices, excluding poorest destinations from instrument set dep. var.: firm-average log real input price excluding from instrument set the poorest 5 dest. 10 dest. 15 dest. 20 dest. 25 dest. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.69** 0.66** 0.67** 0.63** 0.54* (0.27) (0.27) (0.27) (0.27) (0.28) export share of sales -0.25-0.26-0.23-0.18-0.12 (0.32) (0.33) (0.34) (0.34) (0.35) log avg. destination distance 0.06** 0.05* 0.06* 0.06* 0.05* (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) log sales 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01* (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) initial source interactions Y Y Y Y Y firm effects Y Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y Y N 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 224.77 212.81 208.93 204.56 202.84 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 2.41 2.41 2.50 2.64 2.80 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 2.20 2.26 2.30 2.35 2.43 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Specifications are similar to Table 6 Column 6, but excluding subsets of the poorest destinations from instrument set. Column 1 excludes the 5 poorest non-euro-zone countries, leaving the other 95 destinations in the instrument set, and similarly for the other columns. First-stage results in Appendix Tables B10-B14. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A8. IV estimates, input prices, excluding initial source interactions dep. var.: firm-average log real input price (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.56*** 0.68*** 0.69*** 0.67*** 0.69*** 0.65*** (0.20) (0.24) (0.25) (0.25) (0.25) (0.25) export share of sales -0.32*** -0.32** -0.31** -0.39-0.35 (0.12) (0.13) (0.13) (0.30) (0.30) log avg. destination distance -0.00-0.00 0.00 0.05** (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.02) log sales 0.02*** 0.02*** 0.01* (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) initial source interactions N N N N N N firm effects Y Y Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y Y Y N 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 285.04 282.77 282.69 281.82 218.57 269.43 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 3.30 3.07 3.08 3.06 2.50 2.62 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 2.36 2.35 2.35 2.33 2.33 2.33 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Table is similar to Table 6 but excludes the initial source interactions (interactions of indicators for positive imports from origin in 1997 and log real-exchange rate). First-stage results in Appendix Table B15. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A9. Destination income and firm average input prices, two-step feasible EGMM estimates dep. var.: firm-average log real input price (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.41** 0.43** 0.44** 0.42** 0.41* 0.42* (0.17) (0.21) (0.21) (0.21) (0.21) (0.22) export share of sales -0.20* -0.19* -0.18-0.13-0.14 (0.11) (0.11) (0.11) (0.26) (0.27) log avg. destination distance -0.00-0.00-0.00 0.04 (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.02) log sales 0.02*** 0.02*** 0.02** (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) initial source interactions Y Y Y Y Y Y firm effects Y Y Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y Y Y N 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 45659 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 264.22 250.03 249.61 248.92 192.30 232.20 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 3.11 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.09 2.32 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 2.20 2.19 2.19 2.17 2.18 2.18 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Table reports estimates of equation (22) in text, using a two-step feasible efficient GMM estimator. Specifications are similar to those in Table 6. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.

Table A10. Examing role of market power in input markets, time-invariant market power measures dep. var.: firm-average log real input price (1) (2) (3) (4) log avg. destination gdp/cap 0.71*** 0.48** 0.40* 0.64*** (0.21) (0.21) (0.22) (0.15) export share of sales -0.26 0.04-0.45* -0.20 (0.25) (0.23) (0.25) (0.17) log avg. destination distance 0.05** 0.03 0.05** 0.03** (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) log sales 0.01 0.01** 0.02*** 0.01* (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) herfindahl (suppliers) -0.15 5.63 (1.71) (5.76) herfindahl (purchasers) 2.04-14.39 (3.60) (14.79) purchaser share -0.07 9.25* (0.62) (5.41) log avg. destination gdp/cap *herfindahl (suppliers) -0.04-0.89 (0.13) (0.62) log avg. destination gdp/cap *herfindahl (purchasers) -0.02 2.25 (0.35) (1.61) log avg. destination gdp/cap *purchaser share -0.03-1.00* (5.77) (0.58) initial source interactions Y Y Y Y firm effects Y Y Y Y effects Y Y Y Y N 42710 45659 45659 42710 Kleibergen-Paap LM statistic (under-identification) 311.02 357.04 368.77 599.17 Kleibergen-Paap LM p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-stat (weak insts.) 1.47 1.75 2.41 2.35 Anderson-Rubin Wald test F-stat 1.49 1.80 4.70 19.50 Anderson-Rubin Wald test p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Notes: Table is similar to Table 8, but firm-specific measures of market power are calculated from product-level measures that are averaged over sample period. See footnote 32 in Section 5.5 for details. First-stage results in Appendix Table B16. Robust standard errors in parentheses. *10% level, **5% level, ***1% level.