PROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs

Similar documents
FINAL REPORT OF THE BILATERAL COMPARISON OF THE CALIBRATIONS OF STANDARD WEIGHTS BETWEEN CENAM-MEXICO AND INEN-ECUADOR SIM.M.M-S4 (SIM.7.

Supplementary Comparison

INTERLABORATORY MASS COMPARISON BETWEEN LABORATORIES BELONGING TO SIM SUB-REGIONS COORDINATED BY CENAM (SIM.7.31a & SIM.7.31b)

Final Report. SIM / ANDIMET Supplementary Comparison for Volume of Liquids at 100 ml and 100 µl SIM.M.FF-S7

SIM SIM.M.D-K3. provide. SIM.M.M-K5 for. A set of. Institute LACOMET LATU INTI. Country Costa Rica Uruguay Argentina Chile México Canada Brazil

Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12. Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L

LINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg. Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico,

SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

RECENT ILC ACTIVITY IN ROMANIAN MASS MEASUREMENTS

A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard

SIM Regional Comparison on. The Calibration of Internal and External Diameter Standards SIM.L-K FINAL REPORT July 2012

SIM AUV.A-K1.prev Microphone Intercomparison

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Final Report on. Regional Key Comparison for Volume of liquids at 20 L and 100 ml Conducted January 2007 to December 2008 SIM.M.

Traceable Mass Determination and Uncertainty Calculation

FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO).

Portuguese Institute for Quality. Contents

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum

Force Key Comparison CCM.F-K1.a and CCM.F-K1.b 5 kn and 10 kn. Aimo Pusa MIKES Finland

BIPM/CIPM key comparison CCM.FF-K Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L and 100 ml - Piloted by Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM)

Comparison protocol EURAMET project

Interamerican Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization (RMO) Capacitance Comparison, Final Report

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

Final Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2)

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

PC TOOL FOR DATA ANALYSIS IN CALIBRATION OF SPECIAL WEIGHTS

Automated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter

Report on CCM Pilot Study CCM.R-kg-P1. Comparison of future realizations of the kilogram. Final Report

ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME

Correlation Effects in the Uncertainty Estimation of Two-Pressure Humidity Generators

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

Final Report on Comparison of Hydraulic Pressure Balance Effective Area Determination in the Range up to 80 MPa

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

MASS DETERMINATION OF SILICON SPHERES USED FOR THE AVOGADRO PROJECT

PROFICIENCY TESTING. Water Analysis INTI OAA IAAC 2006 FINAL REPORT

VSMOW Triple Point of Water Cells: Borosilicate versus Fused- Quartz

Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)

EURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Liquid density determination by using a solid density standard

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

OIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air

DRAFT B, Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1)

A Collaboration Between Ten National Measurement Institutes To Measure The Mass Of Two One Kilogram Mass Standards

MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS AT MIKES

Calibration of Analog Scales Based on. a Metrological Comparison Between. the SIM Guide and OIML R 76-1

Air Density Determination Using 1 kg Buoyancy Mass Comparison(III)

On the redefinition of the kilogram. Dr Philippe RICHARD

EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands

Report of the key comparison APMP.QM-K19 APMP comparison on ph measurement of borate buffer

Individual Laboratory Safety & Chemical Hygiene Plan

CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram

COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

INVESTIGATION OF IMPACT HAMMER CALIBRATIONS

Certificate of Analysis

CCQM WG on Electrochemical Analysis. Final report on CCQM K99 Key comparison on ph of an unknown phosphate buffer March 2015

Key Comparison CCAUV.A-K4

Purpose of the comparison. Time schedule

Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)

GULF ASSOCIATION FOR METROLOGY. Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method GULFMET.L-S1

CCL-K5. CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars. Final Report

Upgrade of 5m-Bench System for Traceable Measurements of Tapes and Rules at SASO-NMCC Dimensional Laboratory

PRIMARY STANDARD AND TRACEABILITY CHAIN FOR MICROFLOW OF LIQUIDS

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF LASER MARKING FOR STANDARD WEIGHTS

Preparation of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in air standard being traceable to SI by gravimetric method

Final Report On RMO VICKERS KEY COMPARISON COOMET M.H-K1

Interlaboratory Comparison & Proficiency Testing Program

Ajchara Charoensook, Chaiwat Jassadajin. National Institute of Metrology Thailand. Henry Chen, Brian Ricketts and Leigh Johnson

Alignment of the Measurement Scale Mark during Immersion Hydrometer Calibration Using an Image Processing System

Morehouse. Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales:

Automatic Comparison of Weights and Mass Standards

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

OIML R 50-3 RECOMMENDATION. Edition 2014 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

A Method for Verifying Traceability in Effective Area for High Pressure Oil Piston-Cylinders

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN

A SPRT Intercomparison at Hg, TPW, Ga, Sn and Zn ITS-90 Fixed Points between PTB and LATU with PTB as Pilot Laboratory

FORCE NATIONAL STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN CENAM/MEXICO AND NIM/CHINA

Certificate of Analysis

Preparation Primary Gas Reference Material (PGRM) by using NIMT Facilities

Certificate of Accreditation

WGCapD Support to AmeriGEOSS Week Disaster Training Report

EURAMET.M.P-S9 / EURAMET 1170, LOOP2 Comparison in the negative gauge pressure range -950 to 0 hpa FINAL REPORT

Drug Analysis Service. Training Manual

Final Report August 2010

Supplementary Comparison EUROMET.EM-S23 EURAMET PROJECT No 815 FINAL REPORT

DHS1900 DHS3000 High Temperature Hand Held Infrareds User Manual

LEVERAGING DWFI RESOURCES TO ADDRESS WATER FOR AGRICULTURE IN LATIN AMERICA UNDER A CHANGING CLIMATE

Transcription:

PROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs 1. General Information This comparison is being carried out in order to compare the degree of equivalence in mass, conventional mass, volume and density calibration of high accuracy mass standards. 2. Data of the National Laboratories and Technical Contacts for the Comparison 1 National Metrology Institute Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM) / México. Technical Contacts Luis Omar Becerra / Luis Manuel Peña Address km. 4,5 carretera a los Cués, Mpio El Marqués, Qro. México, C.P. 76241 Phone / Fax +52 442 2 11 05 00 al 04 ext 3602 +52 442 2 11 05 68 Email lbecerra@cenam.mx lpena@cenam.mx 2 National Metrology Institute Instituto Boliviano de Metrología (IBMETRO) / Bolivia Technical Contacts Boris Escalante Vargas Address Calle Camacho No. 1488, entre Bueno-La Paz Phone / Fax 591-2-2372046, 591-2-2310037 y 591-2- 2147945 / (591) 72079149 Email bescalante@ibmetro.gob.bo 3 National Metrology Institute Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la competencia y de la protección de la propiedad intelectual (INDECOPI) / Perú Technical Contacts Aldo Quiroga / Luz Cori Almonte Address Calle de la Prosa 104, San Borja - Lima Phone / Fax 51-1-2247800 Anex: 1662 Email aquiroga@indecopi.gob.pe lcori@indecopi.gob.pe 4 National Metrology Institute Instituto Nacional de Metrología, INM - Colombia Technical Contacts Alvaro Bermudez Address AK 50 No 26 55 INT. 2 CAN Bogotá Phone / Fax (571) 588 02 35 / 34 (571) 5870284 Email abermudez@correo.sic.gov.co labmasa@sic.gov.co; jgarcia@correo.sic.gov.co 2012 04 28 Página 1 de 36

5 National Metrology Institute Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización (INEN) / Ecuador Technical Contacts René Chanchay / Marcelo Paucar / Mary Amores / Raúl Hidalgo Address Autopista General Rumiñahui, puente peatonal No. 5 - Quito Phone / Fax 593-2-2343716 / 593-2-2343379 / 593-2- 2344394 Email rchanchay@inen.gob.ec ; mpaucar@inen.gob.ec ; mamores@inen.gob.ec ; rhidalgo@inen.gob.ec 6 National Metrology Institute Instituto Nacional de Tecnología y Normalización, INTN-Paraguay Technical Contacts Address Rubén Ricardo Ramírez Av. Artigas 3973 e / General Roa Asunción, barrio Trinidad Phone / Fax 290160 / 290266 / 290873 Email ruben.r.ramirez@hotmail.com 7 National Metrology Institute Laboratorio Costarricense de Metrología- LACOMET-Costa Rica Technical Contacts Olman Ramos Alfaro / Sandra Rodríguez Address Finca 2, Ciudad de la Investigación de la UCR, San Pedro de Montes de Oca Phone / Fax 506-22836580 ext. 111 Email oramos@lacomet.go.cr srodriguez@lacomet.go.cr 3. General Considerations and Procedure In order to evaluate the degree of equivalence in calibration of high accuracy mass standards, two exercises will be performed in this comparison: 1. Mass and conventional mass determination 2. Volume and density determination For this comparison INEN-Ecuador agreed to act as Pilot Laboratory and CENAM- Mexico accepted to be the Support Laboratory. Two set of mass standards property of the project FOMENTO COORDINADO DE LA INFRAESTRUCTURA DE LA CALIDAD EN LA REGIÓN ANDINA, PTB-CAN will be used for these comparisons. One set (SET 1) will be employed to measure the mass and conventional mass values of the weights, and the other set (SET 2), will be used to measure the volume and the density of the weights. These traveling standards will have the following nominal values and identification (see Tables 1 and 2): 2012 04 28 Página 2 de 36

Table 1. Set of weights for mass and conventional mass determination (SET 1) Nominal value Identification 2 kg 1 kg 200 g 141717 50 g 1 g 200 mg Table 2. Set of weights for volume and density determination (SET 2) Nominal value Identification 2 kg 1 kg 141716 200 g 1 g These sets of traveling standards will be circulated between all participating laboratories. When the traveling standards arrive at the participating laboratory, a visual inspection should be made of the surfaces, and the findings should be recorded on the corresponding sheet (see Annex E). Fig. 1. SET 1 (left) for the mass comparison and SET 2 (right) for the volume (and density) comparison. The traveling standards must be always handled with tweezers, pincers or lifters but never with the bare hands. 2012 04 28 Página 3 de 36

Fig. 2. Sets for the Mass and Volume comparisons, both sets in individual aluminum cases. The traveling standards should be stored at a place near to the balance under glass bell jars (or under a similar protective covering). They should be protected from dust, vapor etc. The measurements should be made after an appropriate period of acclimatization, (at least 3 days after receiving them). The calibration must be done in mass value and the conventional mass should be calculated from the mass value. Air density must be determined with CIPM-2007 formula, in order to correct the air buoyancy effect. The value for the volume thermal expansion coefficient for all the traveling standards (set 1 and set 2) will be 48 x 10-06 ºC -1. 2012 04 28 Página 4 de 36

3.1 Special Considerations for SET 1 (Mass and conventional mass determination) CENAM will determine the values of volume for the traveling mass standards that will be used in the mass comparison, SET 1. The volume of the weights of SET 1 will be sent to the participating laboratories before to their participation in order to apply the corresponding buoyancy corrections. Magnetic properties of set 1 will be measured at CENAM (except 200 mg weight) in order to verify that all of them are in accordance with magnetic specifications the E1 accuracy class according to OIML-R111:2004. For SET 1, during the circulation between the participating laboratories volume or magnetic susceptibility of the weights must not be measure by any participant. For SET 1, the participating laboratories should determine the mass and conventional mass and their associated uncertainties for each traveling standard. The evaluation of the uncertainty should be done by each participating laboratory according to the own calibration system and at the best laboratory capability. Laboratories must not wash or rub the weights of SET 1 with any substance in order to clean them, the only possibility, if it is necessary to passing a soft brush over the surface of the weights in order to take off dust or any other impurity over the weights. 3.2 Special Considerations for SET 2 (Volume and density determination) For SET 2, the participating laboratories should determine the volume and density at 20 ºC and the associated uncertainty for the traveling standards. The participating laboratories should make the measurements before the appropriate acclimatization time of the weights (inside of the liquid of reference). If density of water is used as reference in density, participating laboratories should calculate the density of water with Tanaka s formula. The participating laboratories should report the lowest uncertainty values for the weights of set 2, according with the best capability of the laboratory. 2012 04 28 Página 5 de 36

4. Transportation The traveling standards will be placed in two aluminum cases for transportation purposes. Optical paper will be included in these boxes as well as cotton gloves, pincers and lifters for handling in the event that it becomes necessary to do so while the standards are being transported between participating laboratories. It is strongly recommended that the transportation of the traveling standards between laboratories is made by technical staff of the laboratory. Each laboratory will be responsible for the delivery of the traveling standards to the next national metrology laboratory. 5. Results Participating laboratories should calibrate the travelling standards of SET 1 in Mass and conventional mass value, and measure the Volume and density at 20ºC for weights of SET2 applying all corrections according with their own calibration systems and procedures. Forms are attached in order to report the results of measurements, data of environmental conditions, used instruments and the traceability of reference standards. Once the measurements of the travelling standards have been carried out by participating laboratories, they should submit their results (Annex A form) by e-mail or by fax to pilot laboratory. Participating laboratories will have a maximum period of three weeks after they have finished their measurements to send their results to pilot laboratory. The information of Annexes A, B and C will be send directly to the pilot laboratory. Two separate reports of the comparison will be written by the pilot laboratory and agreed between participating laboratories (one report for mass and one report for volume). These reports will be presented to the Mass Working Group of SIM. 2012 04 28 Página 6 de 36

6. Analysis of Results The pilot laboratory will gather the results of all participants and will draft a report of the comparisons. This draft will be circulated between all participants for comments before to write the final report. For the reference value, if the uncertainty reported by CENAM is at least one third of the uncertainty reported by the other participants, CENAM will establish this reference value, otherwise the reference values will be proposed for the pilot laboratory and calculated from results of participants (e.g. by weighted mean of largest consistent values). 7. Schedule of Comparison Both sets of travelling standards will circulate joint according to the schedule of table 3. Table 3. Circulation of the travelling standards No. National Metrology Institute Arrival Sending of results 1 CENAM-Mexico 2012-04-16 2 INEN-Ecuador 2012-06-08 2012-07-15* 3 INDECOPI-Peru 2012-07-13 2012-08-19 4 INTN-Paraguay 2012-08-17 2012-09-23 5 IBMETRO-Bolivia 2012-09-21 2012-10-28 6 INM-Colombia 2012-10-26 2012-12-02 7 LACOMET-Costa Rica 2012-11-30 2013-01-06 8 INEN-Ecuador 2013-01-17 INEN will send its results to CENAM. CENAM will check consistency between INEN results and CENAM results, once consistency is checked CENAM will send CENAM results to INEN in order to continue with the analysis of all results reported by participants. Annexes A. Calibration Results, environmental conditions during the calibration. B. Characteristics of the balances used on the measurement and instruments for measuring the environmental conditions. C. Traceability D. Uncertainty Budget. E. Records of the surface description of the traveling standards. 2012 04 28 Página 7 de 36

Annex A SET 1 Calibration Results, Environmental Conditions during the Calibration Calibration Results Nominal Value Mass Correction Value mg 2 kg Conventional Mass Correction Value mg Standard uncertainty um (k=1) mg Measurement Method 1 kg 200 g 50 g 1 g 200 mg Environmental Conditions during the Calibration Register the upper and lower limits of the environmental parameters and their standard uncertainties (1). Example: Temperature t /ºC from 20.4 to 20.8 0.2 Nominal Value 2 kg Temperature t /ºC Barometric pressure /Pa Relative humidity h /% Air density / g/cm 3 1 kg 200 g 50 g 1 g 200 mg 2012 04 28 Página 8 de 36

Annex A SET 2 Calibration Results, Environmental Conditions during the Calibration Calibration Results Nominal Value Volume at 20 ºC V cm 3 2 kg 1 kg 200 g 1 g Standard uncertainty uv (k=1) cm 3 Measurement Method Nominal Value Density at 20 ºC g/cm 3 2 kg 1 kg 200 g 1 g Standard uncertainty u (k=1) g/cm 3 Measurement Method 2012 04 28 Página 9 de 36

Environmental Conditions during the Calibration Register the upper and lower limits of the environmental parameters and their standard uncertainties (1 ). Example: Temperature t /ºC from 20.4 to 20.8 0.2 Nominal Value Temp. t /ºC Barometric pressure /Pa Relative humidity h /% Air density / g/cm 3 Liquid Temp. t/ºc Liquid density L 2 kg g/cm3 1 kg 200 g 1 g 2012 04 28 Página 10 de 36

Annex B SET 1 Characteristics of the Balances used for the Measurements and Instruments for Measurement the Environmental Conditions for Mass Determination Characteristics of the Balances Nominal Value 2 kg Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard Deviation 1 kg 200 g 50 g 1 g 200 mg Characteristics of the Equipment for the Measurement of the Environmental Conditions for Mass Determination (for the air density evaluation) Temperature t /ºC Barometric pressure p /Pa Relative humidity h /% Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard uncertainty 1 2012 04 28 Página 11 de 36

Annex B SET 2 Characteristics of the Balances used for the Measurements and Instruments for Measurement the Environmental Conditions for Volume Determination Characteristics of the balances for the weighing in air Nominal Value 2 kg Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard Deviation for the weighing in air 1 kg 200 g 1 g Characteristics of the balances for the weighing in liquid Nominal Value 2 kg Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard Deviation for the weighing in liquid 1 kg 200 g 1 g 2012 04 28 Página 12 de 36

Characteristics of the Equipment for the Measurement of the Environmental Conditions for Volume and Density Determination (for the air density evaluation) Temperature t /ºC Barometric pressure p /Pa Relative humidity h /% Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard uncertainty 1 Characteristics of the Equipment for the temperature measurement of transfer liquid Temperature t /ºC Manufacturer Type Range Resolution Standard uncertainty 1 2012 04 28 Página 13 de 36

Annex C SET 1 Traceability for Mass Determination (Write the traceability of the reference standards up to national standards) 2 kg Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 1 kg Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 200 g Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 50 g Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 2012 04 28 Página 14 de 36

Traceability for Mass Determination 1 g Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 200 mg Identification Mass value m Uncertainty Um (k=2) Traceability and Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. 2012 04 28 Página 15 de 36

Annex C SET 2 Traceability for Volume and Density Determination Mass standards used for volume and density measurement Identification Range of Nominal Value Accuracy Class Date of Calibration Please add lines as necessary. Traceability for Volume and density Determination Density Standard Identification Liquid Employed Density Value Uncertainty U (k=2) Traceability Source Please add lines as necessary. 2012 04 28 Página 16 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 2 kg Influence quantity Mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 17 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 1 kg Influence quantity Mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 18 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 200 g Influence quantity Mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 19 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 50 g Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 20 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 1 g Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 21 de 36

Annex D SET 1 Uncertainty Budget for Mass determination 200 mg Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Mass standard g g Instability of the mass standard g g Density of the mass standard g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the mass under test g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference g g Sensibility of the balance g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability g g Eccentricity g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Mass Please add rows as necessary Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in mass (g) 2012 04 28 Página 22 de 36

Annex D SET 2 Uncertainty Budget for Volume or Density Determination 2 kg Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in volume or density (g/cm3) Mass standard weighing in air g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in air g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in air g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass standard weighing in liquid g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Instability of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Temperature of the liquid ºC ºC thermal expansion of the liquid g/cm 3 ºC g/cm 3 ºC Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference in air g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in air g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in air g g Eccentricity weighing in air g g Mass difference in liquid g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in liquid g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in liquid g g Eccentricity weighing in liquid g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Density g/cm 3 Please add rows as necessary 2012 04 28 Página 23 de 36

Annex D SET 2 Uncertainty Budget for Volume or Density Determination 1 kg Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in volume or density (g/cm3) Mass standard weighing in air g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in air g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in air g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass standard weighing in liquid g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Instability of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Temperature of the liquid ºC ºC thermal expansion of the liquid g/cm 3 ºC g/cm 3 ºC Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference in air g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in air g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in air g g Eccentricity weighing in air g g Mass difference in liquid g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in liquid g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in liquid g g Eccentricity weighing in liquid g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Density g/cm 3 Please add rows as necessary 2012 04 28 Página 24 de 36

Annex D SET 2 Uncertainty Budget for Volume or Density Determination 200 g Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in volume or density (g/cm3) Mass standard weighing in air g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in air g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in air g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass standard weighing in liquid g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Instability of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Temperature of the liquid ºC ºC thermal expansion of the liquid g/cm 3 ºC g/cm 3 ºC Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference in air g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in air g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in air g g Eccentricity weighing in air g g Mass difference in liquid g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in liquid g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in liquid g g Eccentricity weighing in liquid g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Density g/cm 3 Please add rows as necessary 2012 04 28 Página 25 de 36

Annex D SET 2 Uncertainty Budget for Volume or Density Determination 1 g Influence quantity mean value Unit Standard uncertainty Unit Degrees of freedom Uncertainty in volume or density (g/cm3) Mass standard weighing in air g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in air g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in air g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass standard weighing in liquid g g Instability of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g g Density of the mass standard for the weighing in liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Density of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Instability of the reference liquid g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Temperature of the liquid ºC ºC thermal expansion of the liquid g/cm 3 ºC g/cm 3 ºC Air density g/cm 3 g/cm 3 Mass difference in air g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in air g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in air g g Eccentricity weighing in air g g Mass difference in liquid g g Sensibility of the balance weighing in liquid g g Resolution of the balance g g Repeatability weighing in liquid g g Eccentricity weighing in liquid g g Additional uncertainty component 1 Additional uncertainty component 2 Density g/cm 3 Please add rows as necessary 2012 04 28 Página 26 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 2 kg Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 27 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 1 kg Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 28 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 200 g Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 29 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 50 g Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 30 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 1 g Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 31 de 36

Annex E SET 1 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 200 mg 2012 04 28 Página 32 de 36

Annex E SET 2 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 2 kg Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 33 de 36

Annex E SET 2 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 1 kg Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 34 de 36

Annex E SET 2 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 200 g Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 35 de 36

Annex E SET 2 Surface Description of the Traveling Standards 1 g Top Bottom 2012 04 28 Página 36 de 36