Fibres. Temesghen Kahsai. Fibres in Concrete category. Generalized Fibres. Fibres. Temesghen Kahsai 14/02/ 2007

Similar documents
Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

Cartesian Closed Topological Categories and Tensor Products

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 21 Oct 2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adjunctions! Everywhere!

Category theory for computer science. Overall idea

Using topological systems to create a framework for institutions

1. Introduction and preliminaries

Topos Theory. Lectures 21 and 22: Classifying toposes. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello. The notion of classifying topos

MacLane s coherence theorem expressed as a word problem

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07)

A note on separation and compactness in categories of convergence spaces

Categories and functors

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Dual Adjunctions Between Algebras and Coalgebras

Theoretical Computer Science

Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems

The equivalence axiom and univalent models of type theory.

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories

Endomorphism Semialgebras in Categorical Quantum Mechanics

Centre for Mathematical Structures! Exploring Mathematical Structures across Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics, Biology, and other disciplines!

Grothendieck duality for affine M 0 -schemes.

The Essentially Equational Theory of Horn Classes

1 Categorical Background

On injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University

Homotopical methods in polygraphic rewriting Yves Guiraud and Philippe Malbos

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory

Abstracting away from cell complexes

University of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor

The Monoid of Inverse Maps

What are Iteration Theories?

Teooriaseminar. TTÜ Küberneetika Instituut. May 10, Categorical Models. for Two Intuitionistic Modal Logics. Wolfgang Jeltsch.

AN INTRODUCTION TO FUZZY SOFT TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On morphisms of lattice-valued formal contexts

Takeuchi s Free Hopf Algebra Construction Revisited

ON A PROBLEM IN ALGEBRAIC MODEL THEORY

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 28 Oct 2017

Categorical coherence in the untyped setting. Peter M. Hines

Unbounded quantifiers via 2-categorical logic

Categories, Functors, Natural Transformations

Manifolds, Higher Categories and Topological Field Theories

On the Duality between Observability and Reachability

sset(x, Y ) n = sset(x [n], Y ).

First Order Predicate Logic (FOL) Formulas

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid

Category Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017

Algebra and local presentability: how algebraic are they? (A survey)

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

An introduction to Yoneda structures

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

The Grothendieck construction for model categories

h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

arxiv: v3 [math.ct] 16 Jul 2014

Topos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello.

Derived Algebraic Geometry III: Commutative Algebra

Partially ordered monads and powerset Kleene algebras

SOME PROBLEMS AND RESULTS IN SYNTHETIC FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

Algebraic Theories of Quasivarieties

ON THE COFIBRANT GENERATION OF MODEL CATEGORIES arxiv: v1 [math.at] 16 Jul 2009

Topological Groupoids and Exponentiability

TRIPLES ON REFLECTIVE SUBCATEGORIES OF FUNCTOR CATEGORIES

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors

Representation of monoids in the category of monoid acts. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

What are stacks and why should you care?

Pointless Topology. Seminar in Analysis, WS 2013/14. Georg Lehner ( ) May 3, 2015

Derivatives of the identity functor and operads

MULTIPLE DISJUNCTION FOR SPACES OF POINCARÉ EMBEDDINGS

Types in categorical linguistics (& elswhere)

RELATIVE SYMMETRIC MONOIDAL CLOSED CATEGORIES I: AUTOENRICHMENT AND CHANGE OF BASE

IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I

Fibrations, Logical Predicates and Indeterminates

On some properties of T 0 ordered reflection

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY

MORITA EQUIVALENCE OF MANY-SORTED ALGEBRAIC THEORIES

Interpolation in Logics with Constructors

Weil-étale Cohomology

Exact Categories in Functional Analysis

THE HEART OF A COMBINATORIAL MODEL CATEGORY

About categorical semantics

in path component sheaves, and the diagrams

Morita Equivalence for Unary Varieties

Homotopy Automorphisms of Operads & Grothendieck-Teichmüller Groups

Kathryn Hess. Conference on Algebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009

Categorical models of homotopy type theory

Semantics and syntax of higher inductive types

1. The Method of Coalgebra

Categorical relativistic quantum theory. Chris Heunen Pau Enrique Moliner Sean Tull

LIST OF CORRECTIONS LOCALLY PRESENTABLE AND ACCESSIBLE CATEGORIES

Real PCF extended with is universal (Extended Abstract )

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

Morita equivalence of many-sorted algebraic theories

Category theory and set theory: algebraic set theory as an example of their interaction

On Augmented Posets And (Z 1, Z 1 )-Complete Posets

A Taxonomy of 2d TQFTs

CGP DERIVED SEMINAR GABRIEL C. DRUMMOND-COLE

A Fibrational View of Geometric Morphisms

MODELS OF HORN THEORIES

The Ring of Monomial Representations

Transcription:

14/02/ 2007

Table of Contents

... and back to theory Example Let Σ = (S, TF) be a signature and Φ be a set of FOL formulae: 1. SPres is the of strict presentation with: objects: < Σ, Φ >, morphism σ :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, Φ > is a sig. morph. σ : Σ Σ such that σ(φ) Φ. 2. Pres is the of presentation with: objects: < Σ, Φ >, morphism σ :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, Φ > is a sig. morph. σ : Σ Σ such that σ(c Σ (Φ)) c Σ (Φ ). 3. Theo is the of theories with: objects: < Σ, Φ >, where Φ = cσ (Φ). morphism σ :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, Φ > is a sig. morph. σ : Σ Σ such that σ(φ) Φ.

Closure of a set of formulas Definition Let L be an algebra logic [Loeckx et al], Σ a signature, φ L(Σ) a set of formulas. The closure of φ is the set of formulae: φ = {ϕ L(Σ) φ = ϕ} Definition (Logical consequence) Let L be an algebra logic, Σ a signature, φ L(Σ) a formula, Φ L(Σ) a set of formulas and U be a Σ-domain. φ is called logical consequence of Φ in U, if A = Σ φ, for each A Mod U,Σ (Φ); one writes Φ = U,Σ φ.

Monoid specification in CASL spec CommMonoid1 = sort Elem ops end spec CommMonoid2 = sort Elem ops n: Elem; _*_ : Elem x Elem -> Elem vars x,y,z: elem. n * x = x. (x * y) * z = x * (y * z). x * y = y * x n: Elem; _*_ : Elem x Elem -> Elem vars x,y,z: elem. x * n = x. (x * y) * z = x * (y * z). x * y = y * x

Concrete Definition Let X be a. A concrete over X is a pair < D, υ >, where υ : D X is a faithful functor. Concrete categories over SET are called constructs. X is sometimes called base of < D, υ >.

Example: concrete Examples Theo, Pres and Spres are concrete over the Sign. sign : SPres Sign sign :< Σ, Φ > < Σ > sign : Pres Sign sign : Theo Sign where Sign is the of signatures with: objects= < Σ >, and morphism= σ : Σ Σ are signature morphism.

Definition Given a concrete < D, υ > over C and a C-object c. The fibre of c is the preordered class consisting of objects d of D with υ(d) = c, ordered by d 1 d 2 iff id c : υ(d 1 ) υ(d 2 ) is a D-morphism. Definition A concrete < D, υ > over C is called: Amnestic provided its fibres are partially ordered: d 1 c d 2 and d 2 c d 1 implies d 1 = d 2 for all C-objects c and objects d 1, d 2 in the fibre of c. Fibre-complete if its fibres are complete lattices. Fibre-discrete if its fibres are ordered by equality.

Examples SPres and Theo are amnestic. Pres is not amnestic. Fibre-discrete categories they are such that the extension that D makes over the objects of C is inessential, i.e. it has no intrinsic structure or meaning.

Concrete functors Definition A concrete functor ϕ between two concrete categories < D 1, υ 1 > and < D 2, υ 2 > over the same underlying C is a functor ϕ : D 1 D 2 such that υ 1 = ϕ; υ 2. Examples ϕ :< Set, id Set > < Set, id Set > is a concrete functor. ϕ : Rng Ab that forgets multiplication is a concrete functor.

Proposition 1. Every concrete functor is faithful. 2. Given ϕ and ψ between two concrete categories < D 1, v 1 > and < D 2, v 2 >, ϕ = ψ if, for every D 1 -object d, ϕ(d) = ψ(d).

Concrete Subcategories Definition Let < D, v > be a concrete over X and A is a sub of D with inclusion i : A D, then < A, v; i > is a concrete sub of < D, v >.

Generalised definition of fibres Definition Consider a functor ϕ : D C Given a C-object c, the fibre of c is the sub of D that consists of all the objects d that are mapped to c, such that ϕ(d) = c, together with D-morphisms f : d 1 d 2 such that ϕ(f ) = id c The functor ϕ is said to be amnestic if, in its fibres, no two distinct objects are isomorphic. That is : given an isomorphism f : d 1 d 2 such that ϕ(f ) = id c for some object c of C, then f is itself an identity. D(c) : fibre of c

(Co)Cartesian morphisms Definition Let ϕ : D C be a functor and f : c c a C-morphism. 1. Let d : D(c), a D-morphism g : d d is co-cartesian of f and d iff: ϕ(g) = f g : d d and f : c ϕ(d ) such that ϕ(g ) = f ; f, there is a unique morphism h : d d such that ϕ(h) = f and g = g; h 2. Let d : D(c ), a D-morphism g : d d is cartesian of f and d iff: ϕ(g) = f g : d d and f : ϕ(d ) c such that ϕ(g ) = f ; f, there is a unique morphism h : d d such that ϕ(h) = f and g = g; h

(Co)Fibrations Definition Let ϕ : D C be a functor ϕ is a fibration if, for every C-morphism f : c c and D-object d in the fibre of c, there is a cartesian morphism for f and d. ϕ is a cofibration if, for every C-morphism f : c c and D-object d in the fibre of c, there is a co-cartesian morphism for f and d.

Specification as (Co)Fibrations Example Given a signature morphism f : Σ Σ. 1. In SPres: f :< Σ, f 1 (Φ ) > < Σ, Φ > is a cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >. f :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, f (Φ ) > is a co-cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >. 2. In Pres: f :< Σ, f 1 (c(φ )) > < Σ, Φ > is a cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >. f :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, f (Φ ) > is a co-cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >. 3. In Theo: f :< Σ, f 1 (Φ ) > < Σ, Φ > is a cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >. f :< Σ, Φ > < Σ, c(f (Φ )) > is a co-cartesian morphism for < Σ, Φ >.

Cleavages, cloven fibrations Definition Let ϕ : D C be a functor. A choice of a cartesian morphism for every C-morphism f : c ϕ(d ) and D-object d is called a cleavage. A fibration equipped with a cleavage is called cloven.

Proposition Let φ : D C be a cloven fibration and f : c c a C-morphism. 1. The morphism f defines a functor f 1 : D(c ) D(c) as follows: Given d : D(c ), f 1 (d ) is the source of the Cartesian morphism φ f,d : d d that the cleavage associates with the fibration. Given g : d1 d 2 in D(c ), f 1 (g) is the morphism f 1 (d 1 ) f 1 (d 2 ) that results from the universal property of the Cartesian morphism φ f,d2 : f 1 (d 2 ) d 2 when applied to φ f,d1 ; g and id c. 2. The morphism f defines a functor f : D(c) D(c ) in the dual way, i.e. by working on the target side of the co-cartesian morphism.

What if f = id c or f = f 1 ; f 2? Proposition Let φ : D C be a functor. 1. Given a C-object c and an object d in the fibre of c, the identity id d is both Cartesian and co-cartesian morphism for id c and d. 2. Given C-morphisms f 1 : c 1 c 2 and f 2 : c 2 c 3, an object d in the fibre of c1, and co-cartesian morphisms g1 : d f 1 (d) and g 2 : f 1 (d) f 2 (f 1 (d)), the composition g 1 ; g 2 provides a co-cartesian morphism for f 1 ; f 2 and d.

Next week... Fibre completness Grothendieck Construction

References José Luiz Fiadeiro. Categories for Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Germany, 2005. George E. Strecker Horst Herrlich. Category Theory. Allyn and Bacon Inc, Boston, 1973. George E. Strecker Ji rí Adámek, Horst Herrlich. Abstract and concrete categories (the joy of cats). Published under the GNU Free Documentation License, January 2004. Saunders Mac Lane. Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998.