Scaling Parameters in Rarefied Flow and the Breakdown of the Navier-Stokes Equations Mechanical Engineering Research Report No: 2004/09

Similar documents
Effective Boundary Conditions for Continuum Method of Investigation of Rarefied Gas Flow over Blunt Body

All-Particle Multiscale Computation of Hypersonic Rarefied Flow

Application of a Modular Particle-Continuum Method to Partially Rarefied, Hypersonic Flows

Kinetic Models and Gas-Kinetic Schemes with Rotational Degrees of Freedom for Hybrid Continuum/Kinetic Boltzmann Methods

THE design of hypersonic vehicles requires accurate prediction

Velocity Slip and Temperature Jump in Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics

Hypersonic Blunt Body Thermophysics Using a Unified Kinetic/Continuum Solver

Follow this and additional works at:

Entry Aerodynamics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Entry Aerodynamics. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

Vibrational degrees of freedom in the Total Collision Energy DSMC chemistry model

Fluid Equations for Rarefied Gases

A Unified Gas-kinetic Scheme for Continuum and Rarefied Flows

SIMULATION TECHNIQUES IN HYPERSONIC AEROTHERMODYNAMICS

ABSTRACT. Nomenclature

Omid Ejtehadi Ehsan Roohi, Javad Abolfazli Esfahani. Department of Mechanical Engineering Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Iran

Introduction to Aerodynamics. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

Predicting Breakdown of the Continuum Equations Under Rarefied Flow Conditions

Fluid Equations for Rarefied Gases

Summary We develop an unconditionally stable explicit particle CFD scheme: Boltzmann Particle Hydrodynamics (BPH)

Shear Force in Radiometric Flows

Kinetic Effects in Spherical Expanding Flows of Binary-Gas Mixtures

Atmospheric Entry. Technology, Mathematical Model and Simulation

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

An improved unified gas-kinetic scheme and the study of shock structures

A MODULAR PARTICLE-CONTINUUM NUMERICAL ALGORITHM FOR HYPERSONIC NON-EQUILIBRIUM FLOWS

Monte Carlo simulations of dense gas flow and heat transfer in micro- and nano-channels

DSMC solver for an optimized Space Crew reentry Orbital Vehicle

Analysis of Bridging Formulae in Transitional Regime

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007

Lecture1: Characteristics of Hypersonic Atmosphere

Hypersonic Flow over a Wedge with a Particle Flux Method

SIMULATION OF GAS FLOW OVER MICRO-SCALE AIRFOILS USING A HYBRID CONTINUUM-PARTICLE APPROACH

DSMC Modeling of Rarefied Flow through Micro/Nano Backward-Facing Steps

Newtonian Analysis of Rarified Flows

DSMC-Based Shear-Stress/Velocity-Slip Boundary Condition for Navier-Stokes Couette-Flow Simulations

Stefan Stefanov Bulgarian Academy of Science, Bulgaria Ali Amiri-Jaghargh Ehsan Roohi Hamid Niazmand Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Research of Micro-Rectangular-Channel Flow Based on Lattice Boltzmann Method

Visualizing Non-Equilibrium Flow Simulations using 3-D Velocity Distribution Functions

Investigation of Drag and Heat Transfer for Martian Dust Particles

SIMILARITY principles play a fundamental role in applied aerodynamics.

Micro-Scale Gas Transport Modeling

Numerical studies of hypersonic binary gas-mixture flows near a sphere

High Altitude Rocket Plume and Thermal Radiation Analysis

Gas-Surface Interaction Effect on Round Leading Edge Aerothermodynamics

TAU Extensions for High Enthalpy Flows. Sebastian Karl AS-RF

Hypersonic Flow of Rarefied Gas Near the Brazilian Satellite During its Reentry into Atmosphere

Abstract. Introduction

Development of an evaporation boundary condition for DSMC method with application to meteoroid entry

Lecture 5: Kinetic theory of fluids

Numerical Simulation of Rarefied-Gas Flows about a Rotating Cylinder

DSMC simulations of thermal escape

Gas-Surface Interaction Effect on Aerodynamics of Reentry Vehicles

The velocity boundary condition at solid walls in rarefied gas simulations. Abstract

A Hybrid CFD-DSMC Method of Modeling Continuum-Rarefied Flows

Particle Simulation of Nonequilibrium Hypersonic Flows

Rarefaction Effects in Hypersonic Aerodynamics

Low Variance Particle Simulations of the Boltzmann Transport Equation for the Variable Hard Sphere Collision Model

DIRECT SIMULATION CALCULATIONS OF THE RAREFIED HYPERSONIC FLOW PAST A BACKWARD-FACING STEP

Hypersonic flow and flight

1. Introduction Some Basic Concepts

Fluid Dynamics from Kinetic Equations

arxiv: v1 [physics.comp-ph] 7 Mar 2018

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

Review of Fluid Mechanics

Application of the Transition Probability Matrix Method to High Knudsen Number Flow Past a Micro-Plate

Regularization of the Chapman-Enskog Expansion and Its Description of Shock Structure

Generalized Gas Dynamic Equations

TRAJECTORY AND AEROTHERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TOWED-BALLUTE AEROCAPTURE USING DIRECT SIMULATION MONTE CARLO

Three fast computational approximation methods in hypersonic aerothermodynamics

Estimations of Rotational Relaxation Parameters in Diatomic Gases

LATTICE BOLTZMANN MODELLING OF PULSATILE FLOW USING MOMENT BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Stochastic Particle Methods for Rarefied Gases

Non-Equilibrium Flow Modeling Using High- Order Schemes for the Boltzmann Model Equations

Comparison and Analysis of Chemical Models, methodologies and parameters in Hypersonic Rarefied Flows

Rotational-translational relaxation effects in diatomic-gas flows

Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer

HYPERSONIC vehicles generate multi-scale gas flows as a result of both large variations in mean-free-path and

Chapter 1 Direct Modeling for Computational Fluid Dynamics

MODELLING OF THE BOUNDARY CONDITION FOR MICRO CHANNELS WITH USING LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD (LBM)

VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF A PARALLEL 3D DIRECT SIMULATION MONTE CARLO SOLVER FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENTRY APPLICATIONS

RAREFACTION EFFECT ON FLUID FLOW THROUGH MICROCHANNEL

Direct Modeling for Computational Fluid Dynamics

Generation of a Hybrid DSMC/CFD Solution for Gas Mixtures with Internal Degrees of Freedom

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF KINETIC EFFECTS IN LOW-DENSITY HYPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS

Compressible Flow - TME085

Three-dimensional simulation of slip-flow and heat transfer in a microchannel using the lattice Boltzmann method

Effect of Applied Magnetic Field on Shock Boundary Layer Interaction

Non-Equilibrium Kinetics and Transport Processes in a Hypersonic Flow of CO 2 /CO/O 2 /C/O Mixture

A hybrid method for hydrodynamic-kinetic flow - Part II - Coupling of hydrodynamic and kinetic models

Validation of the Chemistry Module for the Euler Solver in Unified Flow Solver

8th European Symposium on ATD for Space Vehicle, Lisbon, 2-6 March 2015

The limits of Navier-Stokes theory and kinetic extensions for describing small-scale gaseous hydrodynamics

Why Should We Be Interested in Hydrodynamics?

Bulk equations and Knudsen layers for the regularized 13 moment equations

Lecture 6 Gas Kinetic Theory and Boltzmann Equation

AA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 14 Feb 2017

Microchannel flow in the slip regime: gas-kinetic BGK Burnett solutions

Notes 4: Differential Form of the Conservation Equations

AER1310: TURBULENCE MODELLING 1. Introduction to Turbulent Flows C. P. T. Groth c Oxford Dictionary: disturbance, commotion, varying irregularly

Transcription:

Scaling Parameters in Rarefied Flow and the Breakdown of the Navier-Stokes Equations Mechanical Engineering Research Report No: 2004/09 Michael Macrossan, Centre for Hypersonics, University of Queensland Notes for a seminar delivered at University of Southern California (Jan 2004) Aeronautical Society of India at Bangalore (June 2004) July 28, 2004 Typeset by FoilTEX

Abstract In high altitude flight the average spacing between the molecules of the flow gas is not negligible compared to a typical dimension of the flow field. In this case, the gas does not behave like a continuum and its discrete particle nature must be considered. The continuum assumption breaks down and the Navier-Stokes equations can, in theory, no longer be shown to be valid, particularly for high speed flight. The fundamental equation describing the flow at the particle level is the Boltzmann equation, from which the Euler equations, the Navier-Stokes equations and more accurate Burnett equations may be derived under various assumptions. Various scaling parameters have been suggested to identify the regimes in which these different equations are valid, ranging from the Knudsen number, Tsein s (1946) parameter Cheng s rarefaction parameter (1961), Bird s breakdown parameter (1971), and a form of the viscous interaction parameter derived from shock-boundary layer theory. All these depend primarily on the non-dimensional group, which must be small for the Navier-Stokes equations to remain valid.

We show how all these parameters may be derived from the Boltzmann equation and interpreted in terms of the ratio of mean time between molecular collision and a characteristic flow time, or as the ratio of typical shear stress to pressure in the flow. Comparison of NavIer-Stokes calculations and direct simulation solutions of the Boltzmann equation show that the Navier-Stokes equations may be adequate for almost rarefied flow. Cheng s parameter appears to be the best correlation parameter and the best indicator of the validity of the Navier-Stokes equations for high-speed blunt body flow. For slender body flow the viscous interaction parameter based on a reference boundary layer temperature, a modified Tsein parameter similar to Chang s parameter, appears to be best. G. A. Bird Breakdown of translational and rotational equilibrium in gaseous expansions, AIAA J, 8, 1998 (1971) H. K. Cheng Hypersonic shock-layer theory of the stagnation region at low Reynolds number Proc 1961 heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Cornell Aero Lab Report IRN 13539152 (1961) H. S. Tsein Superaerodynamics, mechanics of rarefied gases J Aerospace Sci, 13, 342 (1946)

Introduction Importance of mean free path λ, the average distance a typical molecule travelled between collisions. When Knudsen number λ/d is large or when the flow speed is high, gas is not in kinetic equilibrium. No single temperature characterizes the flow (T x T y T z T rot T vib ); the Navier-Stokes equations are not valid (in theory). Many different parameters have been used to characterize high speed and rarefied flow. Consider all the different correlation, or continuum breakdown parameters to show their near equivalence.

Show how all can be derived from the Boltzmann equation - the fundamental equation describing gas flow at the molecular level Quickly show how macroscopic fluid equations, Euler and Navier-Stokes are derived from the Boltzmann equation Comparing results of Navier-Stokes calculations with Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) statistical solutions of the Boltzmann equation Best is a viscous interaction parameter = C M 2 /Re or Cheng s (1961) parameter or modified Tsein (1946) parameter. Modification factor C = µ T /µ T accounts for different collision rates molecular cross-sections viscosity laws for high energy collisions Will try to express everything in terms of the Mach number and Reynolds number (not the natural parameters of kinetic theory!)

Molecular collision rate - viscosity λ y u 2 = u 1 + du u 1 u dy λ 1 2 ρ cu 1 momentum fluxes Parallel flow, velocity gradient du/dy 1 2 ρ cu 2 Move ( or ) with thermal speed c 2RT Distance λ = mean free path Collision time τ = λ/ c, Rate ν = c/λ Shear stress = net x-momentum flux τ xy 1 2 ρ c (u 2 u 1 )= 1 du 2ρ cλ dy Viscosity µ 1 2 ρ cλ = 1 2 ρ c2 τ ρrt τ = pτ, size (cross-section) of molecules

Mean free path - Knudsen number Knudsen number Kn = λ/d, D = body dimension Kn rarefied (no collisions), Kn 0 continuum (collision dominated) λ = 2µ ρ c µ ρ : a state property, not a flow property T λ defined in rest frame of gas Relation to macroscopic flow parameters Kn = λ D µ ρ cd U/ c ρud/µ M Re

3 SPHERE DRAG DSMC calculations 2.5 2 C D 1.5 1 Kissel, M = 10, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 8, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 5, µ ~ T 0.5 Overell, M = 2.95, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 4.92, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 9.93, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 19.7, µ ~ T 0.74 Dogra, M = 10 27, air, µ ~ T 0.73 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Kn Typeset by FoilTEX Scaling parameters in rarefied flow

Free molecular limit C Df 2.2 2.5 cold wall, diffuse reflection 1.1 1 0.9 C D /C Df 0.8 0.7 Kissel, M = 10, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 8, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 5, µ ~ T 0.5 Overell, M = 2.95, µ ~ T 0.74 0.6 Overell, M = 4.92, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 9.93, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 19.7, µ ~ T 0.74 Dogra, M = 10 27, air, µ ~ T 0.73 0.5 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Kn

Tsein s parameter J. Aero. Sci. 1946 Tsein proposed Kn δ = λ/δ. Flat plate length L. Boundary layer thickness δ. viscosity µ density ρ speed U ====> ~x 1/2 BOUNDARY LAYER δ LENGTH L δ L, ReL Re L = ρul µ, Re δ = ρuδ µ Re L Knudsen number based on δ: Kn δ = λ/δ = M Re δ M ReL For Re << 1, δ L, Kn δ Kn L = M/Re L

14 FLOW REGIMES TSEIN J AERO SCI 1946 M/Re = 10 M/Re 0.5 = 1 M/Re 0.5 = 0.01 12 10 FREE MOLECULAR M/Re > 10 i.e. Kn > 10 RAREFIED M/Re 0.5 > 1 MACH NUMBER 8 6 BOLTZMANN EQN SLIP FLOW M/Re 0.5 > 0.01 BURNETT EQNS CONTINUUM M/Re 0.5 < 0.01 NAVIER STOKES 4 2 0 10 2 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 REYNOLDS NUMBER

1 0.95 CYLINDER (PLANE 2D). FREEMOLECULAR Cd fm = 2.2168 Argon: γ = 5/3, µ = µ (T/T ) 0.72, T = 300 K, µ = 2.08e 5 M = 8, U = 2600 m/s, D = 2m 0.9 0.85 0.8 C D /C Df 0.75 0.7 0.65 NAVIER STOKES OK >? > SLIP FLOW > RAREFIED 0.6 0.55 INVISCID C D = 1.21 DSMC NAVIER STOKES 0.5 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 0.5 TSEIN S PARAMETER: M /Re Typeset by FoilTEX Scaling parameters in rarefied flow

1.1 TSEIN s PARAMETER SLIP RAREFIED FREE MOLECULAR 1 0.9 C D /C Df 0.8 0.7 Kissel, M = 10, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 8, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 5, µ ~ T 0.5 Overell, M = 2.95, µ ~ T 0.74 0.6 Overell, M = 4.92, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 9.93, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 19.7, µ ~ T 0.74 Dogra, M = 10 27, air, µ ~ T 0.73 0.5 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 M/Re 0.5 ~ λ/δ

Viscous Interaction Parameter AXIAL FORCE COEFFICIENT C A 10 0 10 1 10 2 TUNNEL FLIGHT CORRELATIONS, NASA SHUTTLE 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 M /Re 0.5 Calspan LaRC N 2 FLIGHT V 2 = C M 2 /Re C = µ T /µ T T = characteristic T of boundary layer For C 1, V 2 = Kn 2 δ i.e. Tsein s parameter Wind tunnel/flight Data Consider C later Data from Wilhite et al. AIAA Paper 84-0406

Collision Number Number of collisions as molecule passes body ( Damköhler number ) Rarefaction parameter (collision number 1 ) P = coll. time flow time = λ/ c D/U = λ U D c Kn M = M2 Re = Kn2 δ U Λ 3 D 3 Λ Λ mean free path, body fame of reference P = τ/(d/u) = Uτ/D = Λ/D

Breakdown Parameter Breakdown of translational and rotational equilibrium in gaseous expansions G. A. Bird, AIAA J 74, 1998 (1970) Local non-equilibrium (i.e. multi-temperatures) when breakdown parameter B M λ ρ/ ρ > 0.02. For ρ/ ρ D, B MKn M2 Re Kn2 δ Take conservative estimate B = 0.01 = Breakdown of equilibrium when TSEIN s parameter Kn 2 δ > 0.01, Kn δ > 0.10, i.e. Navier-Stokes may be valid well into slip regime

Boltzmann Equation Distribution function f: fdv = fraction of molecule velocities v v + dv Evoultion of f (v, r, t) : nf t + v nf r = [nf] coll r = position, t = time, n(r, t) = number density (molecules/m 3 ) Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) approximation to collision term [nf] coll = n τ c (f e f) f e = Maxwell distribution τ c = local characteristic time = p/µ ( collision time).

Boltzmann Eq Macroscopic fluid equations Multiply B.E. by Q = [ m, mv, mv 2 /2 ], integrate over all velocities, integrate over finite volume V, with surface S Q nf t dvdv + Qv nf r dvdv = Q [nf] coll dvdv [ ] [ ] nfqdv dv + nfqc n dv ds = 0 (for anyf) t Conserved quantities: [ nfqdv ] = [ ρ, ρu, ρ ( u 2 /2 + C v T )] for any f Fluxes: [ nfqc n dv ], depends on form of f (on surface S) (1) f = f e Euler Fluxes (2) f = f e (1 + Φ CE ) Navier-Stokes fluxes (3) f = f e (1 + Φ CE + Φ B ) Burnett Fluxes

Non-dimensional Boltzmann Equation Select Lr, Ur = characteristic length, speed, (nr, T r ) = reference state τr = µr/ (nrktr), where µr = µ (Tr) = reference viscosity Non-dimensional values: ˆr = r/lr, ˆv = v/ur, ˆn = n/nr, ˆt = tur/lr, ˆf = fu 3 r ˆn ˆf ˆt + ˆv ˆn ˆf ˆr ( ) ( ) L r τ r n ( ˆf) = ˆfe Urτr τ c nr ( ) ( ) L r µ r T = Urτr µ Tr ( ) = (ζ) 1 µ r T µ Tr ( ˆn 2 ˆfe ˆf ) ( ˆn 2 ˆfe ˆf )

For µ/µr T/Tr, non-dimensional Boltzmann equation is ˆn ˆf ˆt ˆn ˆf ( + ˆv ˆr = ζ 1ˆn 2 ˆfe ˆf ) If (1) same non-dimensional boundary conditions and (2) µ/µ r T/T r then 1 non-dimensional solution depends only on the value of ζ ζ is a rarefaction parameter ζ could be a correlation parameter 1 consider conditions (1) and (2) in more detail later

Limiting Cases: ζ, ζ ζ : Collision rate zero maximum non-equilibrium ζ 0: Infinite collision rate equilibrium Non-dimensional collision time ζ ˆn ˆf ˆt + ˆv ˆn ˆf ˆr = 0 COLLISIONLESS BOLTZMANN EQUATION Typical solution is highly non-equilibrium distribution function.

Limiting case ζ 0 Non-dimensional collision time ζ 0. Infinite collision rate ˆf e ˆf = ζˆn 2 [ ˆf ˆt ] ˆf + ˆv ˆr 0 Result 2 f f e was built-in to BGK approximation, but same result follows from full collision term of Boltzmann equation. ζ is a rarefaction parameter: continuum: ζ = 0, free molecular ζ = 2 If ˆn 0 there may be local non-equilibrium regions embedded in continuum solution

Rarefaction parameter ζ P Tsein s parameter Reference quantities from the freestream Lr = D (body dimension), Ur = U, τr = µ /p λ / c ζ = U rτr Lr = U c λ D M Kn M2 Re P Kn 2 δ Note: ζ = µ p U D = µ U/D p shear stress pressure

Summary: Rarefaction (Breakdown) Parameter ζ ζ collision time/flow time inverse collision number (# collisions past body) ζ mean free path/boundary layer thickness Kn δ = λ/δ Tsein s parameter shear stress/pressure Regimes (for hypersonic flow) Continuum 0 < ζ < 0.0001 Navier-Stokes Slip 0.0 < ζ < 0.02 Navier-Stokes? Slip 0.02 < ζ < 1 Burnett Equations, DSMC Rarefied 1 < ζ < 5-20 Boltzmann Eq., DSMC Free molecular 20 < ζ < Collisionless Boltzmann

Non-dimensional boundary condition Assume diffuse reflection at surface Reflected with thermal speed at wall temperature cw (2RTw) 1 2 ( )1 ĉw = cw/u ref = Sw 1 T 2, where Sw = S Tw Reflected particle travels (average) distance λw before collision 3 ˆλw = λw/d == f (Kn, S, T w /T ) and the viscosity law µ = µ (T ). Similarity depends on ζ (S or M, and Re ) and Tw/T, and viscosity law. 3 See Whitfield (1971,1973) and Cathcart and Macrossan (1993)

Boltzmann Equation: C (µ/µr) (Tr/T ) term With reference state = freestream. Non-dimensional Boltzmann equation ˆn ˆf ˆt ˆn ˆf (ˆn + ˆv ˆr = (ζ C) 1 ˆf e ˆn ˆf ) C = (µ/µ ) (T /T ) varies throughout flow if C is same for two flows at some characteristic region of flow, then C (flow 1) C (flow 2) for all regions of flow (we hope!) e.g. Viscous interaction parameter V 2 = C M 2 /Re C ζ C Kn 2 δ C = (µ /µ ) (T /T ), T /T = 1 + 0.3?M 2 T = characteristic temperature in boundary layer If V 2 C Kn 2 δ same for two flows, non-dimensional flows similar.

10 0 VISCOUS INTERACTION CORRELATIONS SHUTTLE, with C * C * = (µ * /µ )(T /T * ) AXIAL FORCE COEFFICIENT C A 10 1 T * = characteristic T in boundary layer T * = (1 + 0.3?M 2 )T (BEST FIT) Calspan LaRC N 2 FLIGHT 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 0.5 * 2 * Typeset by FoilTEX M /Re C = KnδC Scaling parameters in rarefied flow

Cheng s (1961) parameter K 2 c: Blunt body Thick shock - thick boundary layer: T in the merged shock/boundary layer CURVED BOW SHOCK K 2 c inverse viscous interaction parameter POST SHOCK T s REFERENCE T * = 0.5*(T s + T w ) 1/Kc 2 = C U µ p D C M2 Re Modified Tsein BLUNT BODY Kc 2 ( C Kn 2 ) 1 δ = (C ζ ) 1 WALL TEMPERATURE = T w

1.1 1.1 CHENG S PARAMETER (INVERSE) 1 1 0.9 0.9 C D /C Df 0.8 C D /C Df 0.8 0.7 Kissel, M = 10, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 8, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 5, µ ~ T 0.5 Overell, M = 2.95, µ ~ T 0.74 0.6 Overell, M = 4.92, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 9.93, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 19.7, µ ~ T 0.74 Dogra, M = 10 27, air, µ ~ T 0.73 0.5 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 Rarefaction parameter M 2 /Re = Kn δ 2 0.7 Kissel, M = 10, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 8, µ ~ T 0.5 Kissel, M = 5, µ ~ T 0.5 Overell, M = 2.95, µ ~ T 0.74 0.6 Overell, M = 4.92, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 9.93, µ ~ T 0.74 Overell, M = 19.7, µ ~ T 0.74 Dogra, M = 10 27, air, µ ~ T 0.73 0.5 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 C * Kn δ 2

Conclusions Rarefaction does not depend on Knudsen number alone 14 FLOW REGIMES TSEIN J AERO SCI 1946 M/Re = 10 M/Re 0.5 = 1 M/Re 0.5 = 0.01 12 10 FREE MOLECULAR M/Re > 10 i.e. Kn > 10 RAREFIED M/Re 0.5 > 1 MACH NUMBER 8 6 SLIP FLOW M/Re 0.5 > 0.01 BURNETT EQNS CONTINUUM M/Re 0.5 < 0.01 NAVIER STOKES Importance of Mach number high shear 4 2 < N.S. MAY BE VALID M/R 0.5 = 0.1 0 10 2 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 REYNOLDS NUMBER

Navier-Stokes equations can work into the slip regime 1 0.95 CYLINDER (PLANE 2D). FREEMOLECULAR Cd fm = 2.2168 Argon: γ = 5/3, µ = µ (T/T ) 0.72, T = 300 K, µ = 2.08e 5 M = 8, U = 2600 m/s, D = 2m 0.9 C D /C Df 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 NAVIER STOKES OK >? > SLIP FLOW > RAREFIED Slip wall boundary condition may improve NS solutions in slip regime - not shown here 0.6 0.55 INVISCID C D = 1.21 DSMC NAVIER STOKES 0.5 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 TSEIN S PARAMETER: M /Re 0.5

Rarefaction parameter ζ Near equivalence of many parameters ζ coll. time flow time Shear Pressure M2 Re V 2 ( Kn 2 ) 1 δ Breakdown Best is viscous interaction parameter = C M 2 /Re (or Cheng s parameter) Modification factor C = µ T /µ T For high energy collisions, C accounts for different collision rates collision cross-sections viscosity laws Must select (guess) characteristic temperature T for given flow configuration: B.L. temperature for flat plate, post-shock merged layer for blunt bodies

References [1] H. S. Tsein. Superaerodynamics, mechanics of rarefied gases. J. Aero. Sci., 13:342, 1946. [2] H. K. Cheng. Hypersonic shock-layer theory of the stagnation region at low Reynolds number. Report IRN 13539152, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Proc 1961 heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, 1961. [3] G. A. Bird. Breakdown of translational and rotational equilibrium in gaseous expansions. A.I.A.A. Journal, 8(11):1998 2003, 1970. [4] D. L. Whitfield. Drag on bodies in rarefied high-speed flow. PhD thesis, The University of Tennessee, U.S.A., December 1971.

[5] D. L. Whitfield. Mean free path of emitted molecules and correlation of sphere drag data. A.I.A.A. Journal, 11(12):1666 1670, 1973. [6] A. W. Wilhite, J. P. Arrington, and R. S. McCandless. Performance aerodynamics of aero-assisted orbital vehicles. A.I.A.A. Paper 84-0406, 1984. [7] G. P. Cathcart and M. N. Macrossan. Aerodynamic drag reduction for satellites in low earth orbits. A.I.A.A. Journal, 31:826 831, 1993.