MEASURMENT OF BENDING PROPERTIES OF RHIZOPHORA TROPICAL WOOD. Sarawak, Malaysia. Engineering & Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Similar documents
Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

Laboratory 4 Bending Test of Materials

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Stress-Strain Behavior

Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

Flexural properties of polymers

Bending Load & Calibration Module

PES Institute of Technology

Laboratory 7 Measurement on Strain & Force. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, San Diego MAE170

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 6

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS

R13. II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) PART-A

ME 354, MECHANICS OF MATERIALS LABORATORY COMPRESSION AND BUCKLING

Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship

4. BEAMS: CURVED, COMPOSITE, UNSYMMETRICAL

MECHANICS LAB AM 317 EXP 3 BENDING STRESS IN A BEAM

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

Chapter 7. Highlights:

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

Experiment Five (5) Principal of Stress and Strain

INCREASING RUPTURE PREDICTABILITY FOR ALUMINUM

The Relationship between the Applied Torque and Stresses in Post-Tension Structures

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Mechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

DETERMINATION OF EI FOR PULTRUDED GFRP SHEET PILE PANELS. Abstract

CE6306 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS TWO MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ACADEMIC YEAR

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements

Laboratory 4 Topic: Buckling

FLEXURAL MODELLING OF STRAIN SOFTENING AND STRAIN HARDENING FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE

Sample Question Paper

Strength of Materials Prof. Dr. Suraj Prakash Harsha Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

Question 1. Ignore bottom surface. Solution: Design variables: X = (R, H) Objective function: maximize volume, πr 2 H OR Minimize, f(x) = πr 2 H

AE3610 Experiments in Fluid and Solid Mechanics TRANSIENT MEASUREMENTS OF HOOP STRESSES FOR A THIN-WALL PRESSURE VESSEL

DECLARATION. Supervised by: Prof Stephen Mutuli

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

BEAM DEFLECTION THE ELASTIC CURVE

Lecture 8 Viscoelasticity and Deformation

STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS

CHAPTER -6- BENDING Part -1-

ME 176 Final Exam, Fall 1995

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

7.4 The Elementary Beam Theory

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

Strain Measurements. Isaac Choutapalli

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

STANDARD SAMPLE. Reduced section " Diameter. Diameter. 2" Gauge length. Radius

External Pressure... Thermal Expansion in un-restrained pipeline... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows:

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA

ENG2000 Chapter 7 Beams. ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey Beam: 1

Unit 18 Other Issues In Buckling/Structural Instability

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams

Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.

Symmetric Bending of Beams

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Mechanical Behavior of Circular Composite Springs with Extended Flat Contact Surfaces

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

ISO 178 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Plastics Determination of flexural properties. Plastiques Détermination des propriétés en flexion

Mechanical Properties of Materials

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6

JUT!SI I I I TO BE RETURNED AT THE END OF EXAMINATION. THIS PAPER MUST NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE EXAM CENTRE. SURNAME: FIRST NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

2. Determine the deflection at C of the beam given in fig below. Use principal of virtual work. W L/2 B A L C

Mechanical Design in Optical Engineering

ISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING

(Refer Slide Time: 01:00 01:01)

March 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

MATERIALS. Why do things break? Why are some materials stronger than others? Why is steel tough? Why is glass brittle?

**********************************************************************

Application of Finite Element Method to Create Animated Simulation of Beam Analysis for the Course of Mechanics of Materials

Transcription:

AJSTD Vol. 26 Issue 2 pp. 73-84 (2010) MEASURMENT OF BENDING PROPERTIES OF RHIZOPHORA TROPICAL WOOD Sinin Hamdan* a, Mahbub Hasan b and Yoann Nohe c a Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia b Department of Materials & Metallurgical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh c University of Technology Belfort Montbeliard (UTBM), 90010 Belfort Cedex, France * Corresponding Author: Sinin Hamdan, E-mail: hsinin@feng.unimas.my, Tel: +60-82-583232, Fax: +60-82-583410 73

Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties ABSTRACT The Young s modulus, load at the yield point and proportional limit stress from the compression bending (cb) test were compared with the four point bending tests (4pb). The theoretical Young s modulus are larger than the real reading for 5mm and 10mm thick specimens, except for 200mm long specimens due to specimen nonlinearity. The experimental results for the short specimens are slightly high compared to the theory due to uniaxial compression in both tensile and compressive planes. Since the additional deflection produced by the shearing force and the stress concentration at the loading point was smaller with the compression bending test compared to the conventional four point bending test the values of E cb are larger than E 4pb. It is noted that when length/thickness (l/t)>80, the values of E cb are scattered. In addition, E cb decrease sharply when l/t<30. In order to obtain a stable Young s modulus value, it is suggested that the l/t should be 30~80. Keywords: Young s Modulus; Proportional Limit Stress; Compression Bending Test; Four Point Bending Test; Length to Thickness Ratio 1. INTRODUCTION Bakau (Rhizophora) is a common mangrove tree from Rhizophorace family. It grows best in wet, muddy and salty sediments. Bakau can be immediately recognized by its arching prop and stilt roots. Bakau wood is used extensively in Borneo and South East Asia for the piling of small building and to support small box culvert. Bakau pile is also used in order to reinforce the ground below a raft or footing for a small building. However Bakau pile had never been studied from a mechanical point of view. Previous studies on the bending test method for wood suggest that the stress condition around the loading nose is distorted seriously and that the bending properties are influenced by the loading condition. A compression bending test method based on buckling has been proposed previously. This method of testing corresponds with the traditional use of Bakau wood as pile and removes the undesirable stress concentration from the typical loading nose of the conventional three or four point bending test. In current study, the Young s modulus from the compression bending (cb) test (E cb ) and proportional limit stress (ζ pl ) by the compression bending test were examined and the applicability of the testing method were compared to the conventional bending test methods. 2. THEORY In engineering mechanics, bending (also known as flexure) characterizes the behavior of a structural element subjected to a lateral load. A structural element subjected to bending is known as a beam. Bending produces reactive forces inside a beam as the beam attempts to accommodate the flexural load. Beam bending is analyzed with the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation. The classic formula for determining the bending stress in a member is; ζ=my/i x (1) Where ζ is the bending stress, M is the moment at the neutral axis, y is the perpendicular distance to the neutral axis, I x is the second moment of inertia about the neutral axis x. Equation (1) can be simplified to; ζ=6m/bt 2 (2) 74

AJSTD Vol.26 Issue 2 where b is the width of the section being analyzed and t is the thickness. Equation (2) is valid only when the stress at the extreme fiber (the portion of the beam furthest from the neutral axis) is below the yield stress of the material. At higher loadings the stress distribution becomes nonlinear and ductile materials will eventually enter a plastic state where the magnitude of the stress is equal to the yield stress everywhere in the beam, with a discontinuity at the neutral axis where the stress changes from tensile to compressive. Figure 1 show the schematic diagram of compression bending test. Figure 1: Schematic diagram of compression bending When axial load P is applied in the long axis and δ A is the deflection at the mid-span A, the bending moment at the mid-span is given by; M A =Pδ A (3) From equation (2), ζ can be derived when the deflection δ A is measured. When the loading point displaces x after bifurcation, x/l (where l is the length) is derived by the following equation; 1 x/l=2-[2e(p)/k(p)] (4) Where p is represented by the deflection angle at loading point α; p=sin(α/2) (5) 75

Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties E(p) 2 1 p 2 sin 2 φdφ (6) 0 π d 2 and k( p) 0 2 2 1 p sin (7) A method for determining ρ, the radius of curvature at the mid-span is to measure the strains at the outer planes. When the tensile and compressive strains at the outer planes are ε t and ε c respectively, ρ is obtained as; ρ=t/(ε t - ε c ) (8) The radius of the curvature ρ can also be obtained by p and K(p); ρ/l=1/4pk(p) (9) The longitudinal strain at the outer plane ε is determined by the following two procedures. From equations (4) and (9), the ρ/l and x/l relation is derived by intervening the angle α, as shown in Figure 2. Then ε 1 is derived by the radius of curvature as; ε 1 =t/2ρ (10) Figure 2: The displacement/length versus radius of curvature/length at the midspan. Another method is to average the absolute values of tensile and compressive strains from direct reading of strain gauges. By this method, ε 2 is derived as; ε 2 =( ε t + ε c )/2 (11) The ζ-ε relation can be plotted by these procedures and then the Young s modulus can be determined. When determining the relation between ρ/l and x/l (Figure 2), this relation is approximated by a power function before and after x/l = 0.1; ρ/l=0.101(x/l) -0.5 0 x/l<0.1 (12a) ρ/l=0.138(x/l) -0.56 x/l 0.1 (12b) 76

AJSTD Vol.26 Issue 2 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS Specimens with various length to thickness ratios were cut from Rhizophora tropical wood having rectangular cross sections of 5mm/10mm/15mm (radial direction) x 25mm (tangential direction). The lengths were varied in the range of 200-500mm at an interval of 100mm. Six specimens were used in each test condition. A Shimadzu AG-IS MS series Autograph universal testing machine (Figure 3) was used for conducting the test. The deflection at the mid-span (δ A ) was measured with a linear voltage displacement transducer (LVDT) connected to an oscilloscope (Picoscope). Strain gauges were bonded at the center of the longitudinal-tangential planes of each size of the specimen for measuring normal strains in the loading direction, ε t and ε c. The measurement of the strain was recorded with a Vishay P3 strain recorder and indicator. These data were used for real measurement. Cylindrical attachment V- notched Digital displacement Strain Figure 3: Compression bending test equipment. The specimen whose sides were inserted into the grooves cut on the sides of cylindrical attachments was supported between the V notches. The load was applied by means of these attachments that rotate freely in the V notches. The load was applied axially at 0.5mm/minute and the loading point displacement was measured from the cross-head movement. The E and ζ pl were obtained from the load, the loading point displacement, the strains at the outer surfaces and the deflection until the yield point. Three tests with strain gauges were conducted in order to prove the validity of equation (10). From the relations between ρ/l and x/l, the ζ-ε relation was obtained by the procedure 77

Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties mentioned above. This ζ-ε relation was regressed into the Ramberg-Osgood s power function. The Ramberg-Osgood equation 2 was created to describe the non linear ζ-ε relationship near their yield points; ε=ζ/e+k(ζ/e) n (13) Where k and n are constants that depend on the material. The first term on the right side, ζ/e, is equal to the elastic part of the strain, while the second term, k(ζ/e) n, accounts for the plastic part with the parameters k and n describing the hardening behavior of the material. Introducing the yield strength of the material, ζ o and defining a new parameter, α, related to k as α=k(ζ o /E) n-1, it is convenient to rewrite the term on the extreme right side as follows; k(ζ/e) n =αζ o /E(ζ/ζ o ) n (14) Replacing in the first expression, the Ramberg-Osgood equation can be written as: ε=ζ/e+αζ o /E(ζ/ζ o ) n (15) The value α=ζ o /E can be seen as a yield offset. This comes from the fact that; ε=(1+α)ζ o /E (16) when ζ=ζ o (17) Elastic strain at yield=ζ o /E (18) and Plastic strain at yield = α(ζ o /E)ζ = yield offset (19) The compression bending test was compared to the conventional four point bending test and the bending properties was measured by elementary bending theory. The dimensions of the four point bending test beams were 15mm in width, 15mm in thickness and 600mm in length. The beam was supported by a span of 450mm and the load was vertically applied at the trisected points by loading nose whose radii was 10mm. The loading velocity was 1mm/minute and the deflection at the center of the specimen was measured by a LVDT placed below the specimen. There exist a constant linear relation between the loading displacement x and the deflection measured with the LVDT (δ A ) that is; δ A =1.05x-0.06 (20) Three tests were conducted to determine this relation (equation (20)) and the loading displacement x was used instead of the digital LVDT (δ A ) for the experiment. Strain gauges were also bonded to similar specimens for real measurements. The load, loading point displacement and strain at the center were measured simultaneously. The load-deflection, load-loading point displacement and load-strain relations were regressed into the Ramberg-Osgood's function. The E and ζ pl were calculated by substituting the parameters obtained by the regression into the equations derived from elementary bending theory (bt); E bt =23L 3 P/108wh 3 y (21) ζ bt =P bt /wh 2 (22) Where L, w and h are the span length, breadth and depth of the specimen respectively. Six specimens were used for the four point bending tests. 78

Young's modulus (GPa) AJSTD Vol.26 Issue 2 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Direct Reading with Strain Gauges and Theoretical Calculations Figures 4 to 6 show the E cb obtained using the strain gauges from the compression bending test. The light columns show the theoretical E cb obtained using equation (11) that is ε 2 =[ ε t + ε c ]/2 and using the theoretical relation between ρ/l and x/l (Figure 1). The shaded columns show the E cb obtained from equation (10) and direct reading of the strain gauges and LVDT. It is found that the theoretical E cb are larger than the real reading for specimens with a thickness of 5mm and 10mm, except for the specimens with a length of 200mm. It is noticed that for short specimens (200mm) the experimental results are higher compared to the theoretical results. The fact that the theory yields higher values than the real readings can be explained by the non linearity in material like wood, where weakness are likely to exist in long specimen. Indeed, the theory is for perfect specimens. 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 200 200 200 300 300 300 400 400 400 500 500 500 Length (mm) Figure 4: Young s modulus corresponding to the length with a thickness of 5mm and width of 25mm obtained from the strain gauges. Light and shaded represent theoretical and experimental results respectively. 79

Young's modulus (GPa) Young's modulus (GPa) Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 200 200 200 300 300 300 400 400 400 500 500 Length (mm) Figure 5: Young s modulus corresponding to the length with a thickness of 10mm and width of 25mm obtained from the strain gauges. Light and shaded represent theoretical and experimental results respectively. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 200 200 200 300 300 300 400 400 400 500 500 500 Length (mm) Figure 6: Young s modulus corresponding to the length with a thickness of 15mm and width of 25mm obtained from the strain gauges. Light and shaded represent theoretical and experimental results respectively. 80

AJSTD Vol.26 Issue 2 Figures 7 and 8 are the readings of the strain gauges for specimens of 10mm x 25mm x 200mm and 10mm x 25mm x 500mm respectively. It is noticed that for the short specimen the ε t at the outer planes is also negative like the ε c. This is due to the short length where both planes experienced uniaxial compression. On the other hand, the readings of the strain gauges from the long specimens diverge sharply where the tensile planes experienced purely tension. The bending was not significant with short specimens (200mm) since uniaxial compression are more significant rather than compression bending. Moreover for the 15mm thick specimens, the Young s modulus from the strain gauges are all higher than the theoretical results. For this reason only the specimens with a thickness of 5mm and 10mm are analyzed. Figure 7: Readings of the tensile and compressive strain (ε t, ε c ) from strains gauges for a specimen of 10mm x 25mm x200mm. Figure 8: Readings of the tensile and compressive strain (ε t, ε c ) from strains gauges for a specimen of 10mm x 25mm x 500mm. 81

Young's modulus (GPa) Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties 4.2 Young s Modulus Corresponding to Length/Thickness Figure 9 shows the average E cb corresponding to the l/t obtained by the compression bending tests of the specimens whose thickness were 5mm and 10mm with the standard deviations. The average value for six specimens obtained from the four point bending test is 18GPa. The values of E cb are larger than E 4pb. It is suggested that the additional deflection produced by the shearing force and the stress concentration at the loading point was smaller with the compression bending test compared to the conventional bending test. Furthermore the loading nose dimension for the four point bending test was definitively too small that is the diameter was only 10mm. In order to have a better representation of the shearing force and the stress concentration, it is thought that the use of larger radii of the loading nose is more appropriate. 3 It is noted that when l/t >80, the values of E cb are scattered. This is attributed to the material non linearity. In addition, E cb decrease sharply when l/t <30 and this is thought to be due to the geometrical effect. As seen previously, the short specimens react in uniaxial compression rather than compression bending. Although the shearing force are less compared with the conventional four point bending test, it cannot be entirely eliminated and is significant when l/t is small. In order to obtain a stable Young s modulus value, it is suggested that the l/t should be 30~80. 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 Lenght/thickness Figure 9: Young s Modulus corresponding to the length/thickness. 4.3 Proportional Limit Stress Corresponding to the Lentgh/Thickness Figure 10 shows the ζ pl corresponding to the various l/t. The values of ζ pl increase gradually until it reach beyond the average value obtained from the four point bending test and it decrease after l/t=60. This l/t =60 value is considered as an optimum. From Figure 8 it is suggested that ζ pl at l/t <60 are influenced by the shearing force due to their geometry and ζ pl at l/t >60 are influenced by the non linearity of the material. 82

Proportional limit stress (MPa) AJSTD Vol.26 Issue 2 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Length/thickness Figure 10: Proportional limit stress corresponding to the length/thickness for specimens whose thickness were 5mm and 10mm. The line represents the average value obtained by the four point bending test. 5. CONCLUSION In order to obtain the E cb and ζ pl, the compression bending test was conducted on Bakau wood columns with various l/t. The validity of the testing method was examined by comparing these results with the conventional four point bending test. It is concluded that compression bending are valid for specimens of lenght >300mm, since in short specimens (<200mm) uniaxial compression occurs rather than compression bending. For thin specimens (t=5mm), E cb reduce with length due to bigger ρ, whereas for intermediate thick specimens (t=10mm), E cb are almost constant for all values of l. For thick specimens (t=15mm), theoretical E cb increase with l which is not true as reflected by the direct reading which showed E cb decrease with l. The bending properties can be obtained by the compression bending test without stress concentration that normally occurs in the conventionnal three or four point bending test methods. It can be concluded that the theory fit very well with medium thick specimens (t=10mm), as an optimum thickness for testing Bakau wood which is also proven by direct reading. It is noticed that for short specimens (200mm) the experimental results are higher compared to the theoretical resulus. This is due to the fact that the non linearity in wood exist in long specimen and therefore the theory yields higher values than the real reading. The short specimens react in uniaxial compression rather than compression bending where Young s modulus value is 18 when length/thickness is 20. This value is similar for the average value from six specimens obtained from the four point bending test i.e. 18 GPa. A stable Young s modulus value is obtained when length/thickness are between 30~80 and the proportional limit stress from compression bending test fit well with the four point bending test at length/thickness between 50-70. 83

Sinin Hamdan, et al Measurement of bending properties References [1] Fukuda, H. and Itabashi, M., Comp. A, 1999, 30, 249-256. [2] Yoshihara, H. and Oka, S., J. W. Sci., 2001, 47, 262-268. [3] Yoshihara, H. and Fukuda, A., J. W. Sci., 1998, 44, 473-481. 84