Beam loss background and collimator design in CEPC double ring scheme

Similar documents
Machine-Detector Interface for the CEPC

CEPC Detector and Physics Studies

Machine Detector Interface at Electron Colliders. Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing)

Beam Optics design for CEPC collider ring

Simulation of the ILC Collimation System using BDSIM, MARS15 and STRUCT

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

Pretzel scheme of CEPC

Note. Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Advanced Storage Photon Ring Source Upgrade Project:

Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring

CEPC and FCCee parameters from the viewpoint of the beam-beam and electron cloud effects. K. Ohmi (KEK) IAS-HEP, HKUST, Hong Kong Jan.

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters

Preliminary Design of m + m - Higgs Factory Machine-Detector Interface

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

MAP MDI at SLAC. Thomas Markiewicz, SLAC Muon Collider Higgs Factory Workshop, UCLA March 22, 2013

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

General Considerations

Simulation of PEP-II Accelerator Backgrounds Using TURTLE

Interaction Region Designs for Electron Colliders

Introduction to Accelerators

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

Collider Rings and IR Design for MEIC

Beam-beam Effects in Linear Colliders

BABAR Beam Background Simulation Steven Robertson

A Very Large Lepton Collider in a VLHC tunnel

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Operational Experience with HERA

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

PULSE-TO-PULSE TRANSVERSE BEAM EMITTANCE CONTROLLING FOR MLF AND MR IN THE 3-GeV RCS OF J-PARC

Accelerator development

LECTURE 18. Beam loss and beam emittance growth. Mechanisms for beam loss. Mechanisms for emittance growth and beam loss Beam lifetime:

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 31 Dec 2001

Status of Optics Design

Introduction to Collider Physics

CAIN SIMULATION STUDIES FOR e? e? COLLISIONS. Department of Physics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Overview on Compton Polarimetry

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System

Monochromatization Option for NLC Collisions

Forward Region, Energy Spectrometer, Polarimeter. Snowmass Klaus Mönig

S. Guiducci. Table 1 PADME beam from Linac. Energy (MeV) 550. Number of positrons per pulse Pulse length (ns)

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring. David L. Rubin December 22, 2011

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Polarization studies for beam parameters of CEPC and FCCee

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

ILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

TLEP White Paper : Executive Summary

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

The HERA ep Interaction Regions Learned Lessons

II) Experimental Design

Intra Beam scattering at BESSY II, MLS and BESSY VSR

NEXT GENERATION B-FACTORIES

BEPC AND THE FUTURE PROGRAM AT IHEP

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

MAGNET INSTALLATION AND ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUJI TEST BEAM LINE AT KEKB

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Introduction to particle accelerators

Nick Walker (for WG3) Snowmass, 2001

Practical Lattice Design

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

F. Zimmermann and M.-P. Zorzano, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

PUBLICATION. Beam Dynamics Challenges for FCC-ee

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - SL DIVISION. Multi-TeV CLIC Photon Collider Option. H. Burkhardt

TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario

Low alpha mode for SPEAR3 and a potential THz beamline

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

Sources of machine-induced background in the ATLAS and CMS detectors at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

SBF Accelerator Principles

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

STATUS OF BEPC AND PLAN OF BEPCII

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

E. Gianfelice-Wendt, for the Luminosity Upgrade Group, DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

SLAC-PUB-5205 April 1990 (I/A) DETECTOR BACKGROUND CONDITIONS AT LINEAR COLLIDERS*

JLEIC forward detector design and performance

RF BARRIER CAVITY OPTION FOR THE SNS RING BEAM POWER UPGRADE

Construction Status of SuperKEKB

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

NEUTRINO FACTORY / MUON STORAGE RING

Precision Top Quark Threshold Measurements at the ILC

Lattices for Light Sources

The Electron-Ion Collider

Application of Differential Evolution Algorithm in Future Circular Colliders

Transcription:

Beam loss background and collimator design in CEPC double ring scheme Sha Bai 9 th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC 18), Vancouver, Canada, Apr 29-May 4, 2018. 2018-05-01

Outline Introduction to CEPC double ring scheme and beam loss background CEPC beam lifetime Beam loss backgrounds Collimator design Summary

Introduction 3 energy modes: Higgs, W, Z (120GeV, 80GeV, 45.5GeV) Circumference C 0 =100km N IP =2 Beam power P 0 30MW y * =1.5mm Crossing angle =33mrad Shared RF @ H Independent RF @ W & Z The Machine Detector Interface (MDI) of CEPC double ring scheme is about 7m long from the IP The accelerator components inside the detector without shielding are within a conical space with an opening angle of cosθ=0.993.

Beam loss Backgrounds at CEPC Beam Lost Particles Energy Loss > 1.5% (energy acceptance) Beam-Thermal photon scattering IP1 242 bunches Revolution frequency: 2997Hz. particles/bunch L: IP3 Beamstrahlung Radiative Bhabha scattering Beam-Gas Scattering

CEPC beam lifetime Beam lifetime others Quantum effect Touscheck effect Beam-Gas(Coulomb scattering) Beam-Gas(bremsstralung) Beam-Thermal photon scattering Radiative Bhabha scattering Beamstrahlung >1000 h >1000 h >400 h 63.8 h 50.7 h 100 min 60 min Residual gas CO,10-7 Pa

Radiative Bhabha scattering events According to the off-momentum dynamic aperture after optimizing the CEPC lattice, and considering the beam-beam effect and errors, the energy acceptance of CEPC is about 1.5%. Radiative Bhabha scattering is simulated by BBBrem or Py_RBB. Generate 2e+5 particles.

RBB lost particles statistic ~first two turns Set aperture according to beam pipe RBB generated at IP1, tracking in SAD The position and coordinate in phase space of lost particles near the IP are recorded. Most the events lost in the detector immediately. A few particles with high energy will lost near the IP after one revolution for a small energy loss. Although pretty large fraction of events lost in the downstream region, the radiation damage for detector component is tolerable.

Loss particles due to RBB in multi-turn 7000 6000 5000 Counts 4000 3000 downstream upstream 2000 1000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940 turns Compared to the one turn s tracking, more particles get lost in the upstream region of the IR. The events lost in the upstream region are more dangerous for they are likely permeate into the detector components, even with the small flying angle respect to the longitudinal direction considered. Collimators are needed.

Beamstrahlung events High energy photons from beamstrahlung can interact with each other and induce electron-positron pair production or hadronic background. Also, if the energy spread is larger than the energy acceptance, particles might be lost. Beamstrahlung events have been generated with Guinea-Pig++ or Py_BS. Generate 200000 particles.

BS lost particles statistic ~first two turns tracking Set aperture according to beampipe BS generated at IP1, tracking in SAD The position and coordinate in phase space of lost particles near the IP are recorded. Energy spread distribution close to the energy acceptance, the beam loss particles not appeared in the downstream of first turn.

Loss particles due to BS in multi-turn tracking 4000 3500 3000 2500 Counts 2000 1500 downstream upstream 1000 500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940 turns Compared to the one turn s tracking, more particles get lost in the upstream region of the IR. The events lost in the upstream region are more dangerous for they are likely permeate into the detector components, even with the small flying angle respect to the longitudinal direction considered. Collimators are needed.

Collimator design in ARC for Higgs Beam stay clear region: 18 x +3mm, 22 y +3mm Impedance requirement: slope angle of collimator < 0.1 To shield big energy spread particles, phase between pair collimators: /2+n* Collimator design in large dispersion region: = εβ 2 name Position Distance to IP/m Beta function/ m Horizontal Dispersion /m Phase BSC/2/m Range of half width allowed/m m APTX1 D1I.1897 2139.06 113.83 0.24 356.87 0.00968 2.2~9.68 APTX2 D1I.1894 2207.63 113.83 0.24 356.62 0.00968 2.2~9.68 APTX3 D1O.10 1832.52 113.83 0.24 6.65 0.00968 2.2~9.68 APTX4 D1O.14 1901.09 113.83 0.24 6.90 0.00968 2.2~9.68

RBB loss with horizontal collimator half width RBB loss upstream vs horizontal collimator half width BS loss upstream vs horizontal collimator half width 2500 12000 2000 10000 RBB loss 1500 1000 no vertical collimator y=3.3mm y=3mm BS loss 8000 6000 4000 no vertical collimator y=3.3mm y=3mm 500 2000 0 9 8 7 6 5 x(mm) 0 9 8 7 6 5 x(mm) Only horizontal collimator are selected, vertical collimators are not needed. Vertical collimators are usually placed very close to the beam, no vertical collimators to avoid transverse mode coupling instability.

RBB and BS loss with collimators for Higgs Lost particles due to RBB in turns with collimators half width x=5mm for Higgs Lost particles due to BS in turns with collimator half width x=5mm for Higgs 8000 1 Counts 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 downstream upstream Counts 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 downstream upstream 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 turns 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 turns horizontal collimator half width 5mm(13 x ) The collimators will not have effect on the beam quantum lifetime. The lost particles has been reduced to a very low level with the system of collimators, especially in the upstream of the IP. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still pretty large in the first turn tracking, the radiation damage and the detector background are not as serious as the loss rate for the relative small flying angle to the ideal orbit.

Beam-Gas bremsstrahlung in Higgs beam-gas lifetime [h] 85.00 80.00 75.00 70.00 65.00 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 energy acceptance Events According to the off-momentum dynamic aperture after optimizing the CEPC lattice, and considering the beam-beam effect and errors, the energy acceptance of CEPC is about 1.5%. When the energy acceptance is 1.5%, the beam-gas bremsstrahlung lifetime is about 63.8 hours. Generate ~ 100000 particles.

Beam-Gas bremsstrahlung loss particles Without collimators With collimators The lost particles has been reduced to a very low level with RBB collimators, especially in the upstream of the IP, can be accepted by the detector. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still remained, the radiation damage and the detector background are not serious, since the direction is leaving the detector.

Beam-Thermal photon scattering in Higgs beam-thermal photons lifetime [h] 100.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 energy acceptance Events According to the off-momentum dynamic aperture after optimizing the CEPC lattice, and considering the beam-beam effect and errors, the energy acceptance of CEPC is about 1.5%. When the energy acceptance is 1.5%, the beam-thermal photons scattering lifetime is about 50.7 hours. Generate ~ 100000 particles.

Beam-Thermal photon scattering loss Without collimators With collimators The lost particles has gone with RBB collimators in the upstream of the IP, can be accepted by the detector. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still remained, the radiation damage and the detector background are not serious, since the direction is leaving the detector.

Collimator design in ARC for Z Beam stay clear region: 18 x +3mm, 22 y +3mm Impedance requirement: slope angle of collimator < 0.1 To shield big energy spread particles, phase between pair collimators: /2+n* Collimator design in large dispersion region: = εβ 2 name Position Distance to IP/m Beta function/m Horizontal Dispersion/ m Phase BSC/2/m Range of half width allowed/mm APTX1 D1I.1897 2139.06 113.83 0.24 357.36 0.00323 0.83~3.23 APTX2 D1I.1894 2207.63 113.83 0.24 357.11 0.00323 0.83~3.23 APTX3 D1O.10 1832.52 113.83 0.24 6.876 0.00323 0.83~3.23 APTX4 D1O.14 1901.09 113.83 0.24 7.126 0.00323 0.83~3.23 Although Z lattice is the same as the one in higgs, the emittance is about 7 times lower. So BSC is smaller. According to the off-momentum dynamic aperture after optimizing the CEPC lattice, and considering the beam-beam effect and errors, the energy acceptance is about 1.0%.

RBB loss with collimators for Z Lost particles due to RBB in turns with collimators half width x=2.5mm for Z 6000 5000 4000 Counts 3000 2000 downstream upstream 1000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940 turns No beamstrahlung in Z horizontal collimator half width 2.5mm(17 x ) The collimators will not have effect on the beam quantum lifetime. The lost particles has been reduced to a very low level with the system of collimators, especially in the upstream of the IP. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still pretty large in the first turn tracking, the radiation damage and the detector background are not as serious as the loss rate for the relative small flying angle to the ideal orbit.

Beam-Gas bremsstrahlung in Z Without collimators With collimators Beam-Gas bremsstrahlung is important effect due to beam lifetime caused by it ~ 57.26 hours. With collimators design half width x=2.5mm, the beam loss caused by beam-gas bremsstrahlung has disappeared in upstream of the IP. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still pretty large in the first turn tracking, the radiation damage and the detector background are not as serious as the direction is leaving the detector.

Beam thermal photon scattering in Z Without collimators With collimators Beam thermal photon scattering is important effect due to beam lifetime caused by it ~ 70.17 hours. With collimators design half width x=2.5mm, the beam loss caused by beam thermal photon scattering has disappeared in upstream of the IP. Although the beam loss in the downstream of the IP is still pretty large in the first turn tracking, the radiation damage and the detector background are not as serious as the direction is leaving the detector.

Hit Density at VTX The level of the beam induced backgrounds are evaluated by the hit density at the vertex detector. ~ 1e+7 events input. The event rate with collimators is acceptable for the CEPC detector for beam loss particles. Requirement from detector: hit density should be smaller than a few hits/cm 2 /BX.

Summary Beam lifetime of CEPC double ring scheme is evaluated. The most importance beam loss background is radiative Bhabha scattering and beamstrahlung. Beam loss background in the upstream of multi-turn tracking seems serious, but with two pairs of horizontal collimators which are in the upstream and downstream ARC respectively, beam loss have disappeared in the upstream of IP for both Higgs and Z factory. Collimators are designed in the ARC which is about 2km far from the IP to avoid other backgrounds generation. The event rate with collimators is acceptable for the CEPC detector for beam loss particles.