A Study of RHIC Crystal Collimation

Similar documents
D. Trbojevic, A.J. Stevens, M.A. Harrison, E Dell, and S. Peggs Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA

The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System

The limits of volume reflection in bent crystals

Status and Results of the UA9 Crystal Collimation Experiment at the CERN-SPS

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Studies of Nanotube Channeling for. Efficient Beam Scraping at Accelerators

Experiments on deflection of charged particles using silicon crystals at. Proton Synchrotron (KEK(

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

INTRODUCING CHANNELING EFFECT

OBTAINING SLOW BEAM SPILLS AT THE SSC COLLIDER D. Ritson Stanford Linear Accelerator Stanford, CA 94309

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

Overview of LHC Accelerator

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009

Tagging with Roman Pots at RHIC. Proton tagging at STAR

Beam-beam Simulations of Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen Fermilab, PO Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510

Beam-induced radiation in the compact muon solenoid tracker at the Large Hadron Collider

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED SCALING FFAG ACCELERATOR

SC magnets for Future HEHIHB Colliders

RHIC AND ITS UPGRADE PROGRAMS

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC

Simulation of the ILC Collimation System using BDSIM, MARS15 and STRUCT

Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*

Beam losses far downstream of the high luminosity interaction points of LHC - intermediate results

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

Parametrization of the Driven Betatron Oscillation

Particle Acceleration

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

σ ε ω 1 /σ ω ε α=ω 2 /ω 1

Merlin scattering models for the HL-LHC collimation system

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

ECT Trento Experimental overview of Bound-Free e+ e- Pair Production in Heavy Ion collisions. Per Grafstrom CERN

F. Zimmermann and M.-P. Zorzano, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Hadron cancer therapy complex using nonscaling fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design

DEVELOPMENT AND BENCHMARKING OF CODES FOR SIMULATION OF BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AT THE LHC

NEPTUN-A Spectrometer for measuring the Spin Analyzing Power in p-p elastic scattering at large P~ at 400 GeV (and 3 TeV) at UNK.

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS IN RHIC

Simulations of HL halo loss and IR losses. R. Bruce, F. Cerutti, R. de Maria, A. Marsili, S. Redaelli

Sources of machine-induced background in the ATLAS and CMS detectors at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

1,0 0,8. Coefficient 0,6 0,4 0,2

Preparing for a Crystal Experiment Proposal

Polarised e ± at HERA

Longitudinal Momentum Mining of Beam Particles in a Storage Ring

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

Longitudinal Dynamics

P-Carbon CNI Polarimeter Operation Experience

ELIC Design. Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators. Jefferson Lab. Second Electron-Ion Collider Workshop Jefferson Lab March 15-17, 2004

Particle physics experiments

Simulations and measurements of collimation cleaning with 100MJ beams in the LHC

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

Bent crystals as a tool for manipulation of ultra-relativistic electron beams. Institut fur Kernphysik, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz, Germany

The FLUKA study of the secondary particles fluence in the AD-Antiproton Decelerator target area.

Colliding Crystalline Beams

FROM HERA TO FUTURE ELECTRON-ION COLLIDERS*

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

CERN-ATS HiLumi LHC. FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study PUBLICATION

NEGATIVE PARTICLE PLANAR AND AXIAL CHANNELING AND CHANNELING COLLIMATION

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

ERHIC - A PRECISION ELECTRON-PROTON/ION COLLIDER FACILITY AT BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

Proton-Nucleus Scattering Approximations and Implications for LHC Crystal Collimation*

Carbon/proton therapy: A novel gantry design

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Dec 2013

Accelerator Design of High Luminosity Electron-Hadron Collider erhic

Compensating Parasitic Collisions Using Electromagnetic Lenses

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

V.G. Baryshevsky. Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus

Status of Optics Design

Beam loss background and collimator design in CEPC double ring scheme

AC dipole based optics measurement and correction at RHIC

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Crystal Channeling Radiation and Volume Reflection Experiments at SLAC

Beam Cleaning and Collimation Systems

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

JLEIC forward detector design and performance

General Considerations

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 29 Nov 2014

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV

Introduction to Accelerators

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

Heavy-ion collisions in a fixed target mode at the LHC beams

Transcription:

A Study of RHIC Crystal Collimation arxiv:hep-ex/0111021v1 7 Nov 2001 D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA, V.Biryukov, IHEP, Protvino, Russia, M.Harrison, B.Parker, P.Thompson, and A. Stevens, BNL, USA, N.Mokhov and A.Drozhdin, FNAL, USA Presented at EPAC 1998 (Stockholm) Abstract The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) will experience increasing longitudinal and transverse heavy ion emittances, mostly due to intra-beam scattering (IBS). The experiments in RHIC are expected to not only have reduced luminosities due to IBS but also an unwanted beam halo. Primary betatron collimators will be used to remove the large amplitude particles. The efficiency of the primary collimator in RHIC depends very much on the alignment of the jaws which needs to be within few micro-radians for the best conditions. As proposed by V. Biryukov [1] bent crystals could be used to improve the efficiency of an existing collimation system by installing them upstream of the collimator jaws. Bent crystals have been successfully used in SPS, Protvino and Fermilab for extraction of the beam particles channeled through them. This study examines possible improvements of the primary collimator system for heavy ions at RHIC by use of bent crystals. Bent crystals will reduce the collimator jaws alignment requirement and will increase collimator efficiency thereby reducing detector background. 1 1 Introduction The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) has two large angle acceptance detectors PHENIX and STAR placed at the interaction regions (IR- s) where the heavy ion beams (like fully striped gold +79 Au 197 ions) from the two parallel rings will be focussed to β = 1 2m. The intra-beam scattering of the heavy ions like gold +79 Au 197 ions is expected to be a dominant effect of the emittance growth with a fast loss of luminosity. The transverse and longitudinal emittances are expected to double in size between one to two hours due to intra-beam scattering which may lead to transverse beam loss. Particle amplitudes also grow due to other effects like beam gas interaction, beam diffusion due to the nonlinear beam dynamics etc. This results in beam loss at limiting apertures at the triplet magnets close to the large detectors. This beam loss creates hadronic showers which leads to larger than desirable backgrounds in detectors. To reduce this background it is necessary to scrape the unwanted beam. The primary betatron collimator has to be able to remove particles with large amplitudes. The 1 Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy 1

RHIC collimator studies previously reported [2], [3], had shown that a combination of the primary with the secondary collimators reduced the background around the large detectors. The studies have shown that losses of the out-scattered ions from the primary collimators were, as expected, localized at the high beta focusing quadrupoles. The amplitude growth of the the gold +79 Au 197 and proton ion beams was estimated by a diffusion process based on measurements at the SPS-CERN [4]. The energy and phase distributions of the out-scattered ions from the primary collimators were obtained by using the ELSHIM Van Ginneken code [6], [7], which simulated transport of the 100 GeV gold +79 Au 197 ion beam through the primary collimator jaws. The previous study [3] has shown that for the best collimation of the gold ions the alignment of the primary collimators jaws has to be within about 10 µrad. This is a report where a simulation of the bent crystal deflection for the RHIC beam collimation of the heavy ion beam is described. There are few motivations for this study and an eventual implementation of the bent crystals for the collimation purposes: The bent crystal, with a length of the order of 1 cm removes a request for the high accuracy in alignment of the primary collimator jaws The primary collimators, placed 7 m downstream of the crystal, become effectively the secondary collimators, because most of the large amplitude particles are bent into it. The background of the large detectors will be reduced because the losses at the high focusing quadrupoles are expected to be reduced. 1.1 Bent Single Crystal Deflection The protons and heavy ion (like fully stripped lead 208 Pb 82+ ions) bent single crystal extraction has been demonstrated and continually used at many laboratories like (SPS, Fermilab, IHEP, Aarhus, ect.) and previously reported in many articles [8], [9], [10] ect. The high energy relativistic particles are channeled within the bent crystal planes and bent away from the center of the beam. The theoretical predictions and experimental results of the crystal extraction and deflection are very well understood. The crystal extraction efficiency is defined as the number of ions extracted by the crystal with respect to the number of lost particles due to the crystal. The theoretical predictions of the crystal extraction F are obtained by tracking the particles through the potential of the bent crystal lattice taking into account the multipole and catastrophic scattering, nuclear and electronic collisions with the crystal discontinuities, surface effects and dislocations [10]. The heavy ions (like +79 Au 197 ) interact with the crystal matter differently than protons due to their large mass and high charge state. The critical angle ψ c, one of the most important parameters for the channeling acceptance [5] scales with the mass and charge as ψ c Z p. 2

2 Bent Crystal Collimation Simulation in RHIC The crystal collimation is clearly a multi turn process. The multi turn efficiency for the TEVATRON is estimated well above 90% at the peak according to our simulation. In this report, instead of a proper simulation of the multi turn deflection a simulation a single pass of the diffused gold ions is performed. The initial horizontal and vertical phase space distributions of 19528 gold +79 Au 197 ions in front of the crystal were obtained by selecting ions which had their amplitudes grown above 5σ x horizontally by diffusion process. The diffusion was described by the published experimental and theoretical results from the SPS (CERN) [4]. All particles in the initial horizontal phase space distribution have the horizontal distance larger than x 0.04290 m which represents 5σ x of beam with the 40πmmmrad emittance. The betatron functions at this position of the crystal are presented in Table 1. Before the gold ions were transported through the 1 mrad bent silicon single crystal Si(110), an optimum value for the crystal length was selected to be l=1 cm along the beam direction. This length provides large enough deflection efficiency and is still practical for the experimental use. The gold +79 Au 197 ions, with an input energy of Table 1: Betatron Functions at the Crystal β x (m) α x β y α y D x 1222.631 29.349 365.902 13.885-1.055 γ=108.4, are transported through the lattice of the bent silicon crystal by the Monte Carlo program CATCH [12]. The total number of the gold ions which passed the crystal was 18296. The number of particles which interacted with the crystal nuclei was 5%. The simulation of the bent crystal collimation is continued by using the ions obtained from the output at the crystal edge. Four coordinates of each ion (x, x, y, y, dp/p) were used as an input into the tracking program TEAPOT [11]. All measured systematic as well as the random multipole errors in the magnetic field for each magnet were introduced into the lattice as well as the measured magnet misalignment errors. The bent single crystal is placed in the lattice at the position downstream of the high focusing quadrupoles at the IR where the PHENIX detector is located. The tracking was performed at the top energy of 100 GeV/nucleon for gold for 256 turns. The rms values for misalignment of the arc quadrupoles were x,y=0.5 mm θ=0.5 mrad, while from the measurements of the triplet quadrupoles the roll and misalignment errors for the rms values were θ=0.5 mrad and x,y=0.5 mm. During tracking the RF voltage was included and the longitudinal motion of the surviving particles could be monitored. Particles which survived, with momentum offsets within the bucket size limit, executed synchrotron oscillations. In the phase space of the gold ions at the end of the crystal, there are large number of particles with momenta larger than the bucket size. If these particles are not removed by the primary collimators they will be lost due to their large momentum offsets. The crystal length, together with its bending angle, can be further reduced to affect the momentum loss distribution which will be addressed in our future simulations. 3

2.1 Transverse Phase Space Distribution at the Crystal End The position of the primary collimator is 7.68 m downstream of the single crystal. Each tracking run was performed with a different position of the primary collimator selected to a distance from center of the beam, starting with a position completely away from the beam. In gold ion distributions in the horizontal phase space at the downstream edge of the crystal, there are several important features to point out: -The channeled particles are contained in the upper part of the x and x plot with a slope of x ch 0.073 mrad. The slope of the gold ions, used for the input into the bent crystal, is within the range of 1.080mrad < x input < 1.058mrad. A difference between the average slopes of x ch x input 1 mrad, shows that the channeled particles are bent for 1 mrad. -The group of particles at the lower part of the x and x plot with a value of x 0.04289 m and with the slope of x -1.15 mrad is not channeled. The slope of the horizontal amplitude x 1.15 mrad reaches negative values larger than the end within the initial distribution (-1.108 mrad). -Particles with the slope of the horizontal amplitude between the channeld ones and the edge clearly interacted with the crystal lattice. When the primary collimator was completely away from the beam, the particles from the crystal are lost mostly at the first quadrupole downstream of it, as well as at the high focusing quadrupoles around the IR s where the β =1 m. In the gold ion distribution in the horizontal phase space, at the 7.68 m downtream of the crystal, particles which reached the primary collimator in the first pass are presented within a very narrow region between values of the slope of the horizontal amplitude 1.17 mrad x 0.47 mrad. Particles within the ellipse survived many turns and reach every turn the primary collimator again. If all the particles are channeled then the primary collimator could be set up at the distance close to 0.042 m. It is clear that not all the particles are channeled and there will be losses around the ring even when the primary collimator is set to a horizontal distance of 5σ x of the beam. This is due to the paticles which come from the crystal with the slopes larger than 1.08 mrad from the crystal edge. 3 A Comparison of the Crystal Collimation with the Previous Results The large amplitude particles are mostly likely to get lost at the most limited appertures in the two RHIC accelerator rings which are located at the high focusing triplet magnets. The background of the two large detectors will be enhanced by the showers generated by these lost particles. Table 2 represents a the losses around the RHIC rings from the particles scattered of the standard collimation case by using a standard primary and secondary collimators while table 3 shows the losses from the particles deflected by the crystal. In the table 3 two extreme cases are presented when the primary collimator downstream of the crystal is wide open and when it is set to 5σ x, the same horizontal distance as a front edge of the crystal. 4

Table 2: Ring Losses for Standard Collimation Location Sec. Opened Sec. Col. 6σ S.Col. 0.00 % 62.30 % q2o8 42.38 % 16.99 % q3o8 8.20 % 3.30 % q3i6 14.26 % 0.30 % Pr.Col 12.11 % 5.10 % Table 3: Ring Losses for Crystal Collimation Location Pr. Col. Open Pr. Col. 5σ Pr.Coll. 0.00 % 99.43 % q2o8 0.70 % 0.00 % q3o8 1.87 % 0.00 % q3i6 14.56 % 0.52 % Crystal 2.66 % 0.00 % 4 Conclusions We presented a simulation study where the bent single crystals are used in the RHIC collimation system. The preliminary results are very encouraging. The 100 GeV/nucleon gold ions were transported through the bent single crystal Si(110) and the gold ions from the crystal were tracked through the RHIC storage lattice. A comparison to the previous results with a standard two stage collimator system shows lower losses around the ring from the outscattered particles. This would possibly reduced background at the two large detectors due to smaller losses at the high focusing limited apperture quadrupoles located around the detectors. The study of the crystal collimation in RHIC will be concluded by the multiturn crystal deflection simulation and with a shorter length and smaller bending angle single crystal. We expect improvement in the momentum distribution of the ions passed through the crystal and a reduction of lost particles around the ring. References [1] V. Biryukov, Proceedings of the International Simposium on Near Beam Physics, at Fermi National Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA, Sptember 22-24, 1997, pp. 179-184. [2] D. Trbojevic, A.J. Stevens, M.A. Harrison, F. Dell, and S. Peggs, A Study of Betatron and Momentum Collimators in RHIC, Proc Part. Acc. Conference PAC97, Vancouver, May 1997. 5

[3] D. Trbojevic and A.J. Stevens, A Study of Betatron and Momentum Collimators in RHIC, Proceedings from the International Symposium on Near Beam Physics at Fermi National Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA, September 22-24, 1997, pp. 137-142. [4] W. Fischer, M. Giovannozzi and F. Schmidt, Dynamic aperture experiment at a synchrotron, Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 55, Number 3, p. 3507 (1997). [5] J.Lindhard, Mat.Fys.Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk., Vol. 34, 1 (1965). [6] A.Van Ginneken, Elastic scattering in thick targets and edge scattering, Physical Review D, Vol. 37, number 11, 1 June 1988, pp.3292-3307. [7] A.Van Gineken, ELSHIM, Program to simulate Elastic Processes of Heavy Ions, BNL-47618, AD/RHIC-100, Informal Report, May 1992. [8] G. Arduini, K. Elsener, G. Fidecaro, M.Gyr, W. Herr, J. Klem, U. Mikkelsen, and E. Weisse, Energy Dependence of crystal assisted extraction at the CERN SPS, Proc. Part. Acc. Conference PAC97, Vancouver, May 1997. [9] C. Biino, M. Clement, N. Doble, K. Elsener, A. Freund, L. Gatignon, P. Grafstrom, K. Kirsebom, U. Mikkelsen, S.P. Moller, E. Uggerhoj, and T. Worm, Deflection of 200 GeV/c and 450 GeV/c positevily charged particles in a bent germanium crystal, Physics Letters B, Vol. 403, (1997), pp.163-167. [10] V. Biryukov, Computer Simulation of Crystal Extraction of Protons from a Large- Hadron-Collider Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 74, Number 13, p 2471-2474(1995). [11] L.Schachinger and R. Talman, A Thin Element Accelerator Program for Optics and Tracking, SSC Central Design Group, Internal Report SSC-52 (1985). [12] Valery Biryukov, Crystal Channeling Simulation-CATCH 1.4 User s Guide, SL/Note 93-74(AP), CERN, 1993. 6