Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, L1 L6 (0000) Printed 15 April 2008 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) Pressure-driven outflow from a dynamo active disc A. Brandenburg, W. Dobler, A. Shukurov and B. von Rekowski Department of Mathematics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK Accepted... Received...; in original form... arxiv:astro-ph/0003174v1 13 Mar 2000 1 INTRODUCTION The importance of magnetic fields for disc accretion is widely recognized (e.g. Mestel 1999), and the turbulent dynamo is believed to be a major source of magnetic fields in accretion discs (Pudritz 1981; Stepinski & Levy 1988; Brandenburg et al. 1995; Hawley, Gammie & Balbus 1996). A magnetic field anchored in the disc is further considered to be a major factor in launching and collimating a wind in young stellar objects and active galactic nuclei (Blandford & Payne 1982); see Königl & Pudritz (1999) for a recent review of stellar outflows. Yet, most models of the formation and collimation of jets rely on an externally imposed poloidal magnetic field and disregard any field produced in the disc. Our aim here is to study the interaction of a wind with dynamo-generated magnetic fields. We use parameters of young stellar objects in our estimates, but the model applies to systems containing black holes after obvious modifications. Extensive numerical studies of collimated disc winds have been performed using several types of model. Uchida & Shibata (1985), Matsumoto et al. (1996) and Kudoh, Matsumoto & Shibata (1998) consider an ideal MHD model of an accretion disc embedded in a non-rotating corona, both permeated by an external magnetic field initially parallel to the disc rotation axis. Intense accretion develops in the disc (Stone & Norman 1994), accompanied by a centrifugally driven outflow. The wind is eventually collimated by toroidal magnetic field produced in the corona by winding up the poloidal field. Bell (1994), Bell & Lucek (1995) and Also at: NORDITA, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark ABSTRACT We present a numerical model of an accretion disc with mean-field dynamo action that develops a fast pressure-driven outflow within a cone near the rotation axis and a slower centrifugally driven outflow in the outer parts of the disc. The fast outflow in the cone is confined by the azimuthal field which is produced by the dynamo in the disc and advected to the disc corona. The fast outflow has low angular momentum and, in the presence of magnetic fields, is hotter and denser than its surroundings. The cone s half-opening angle is about 30 near the disc and decreases slightly with height. The slow outflow transports significant amounts of magnetic energy into the surrounding medium. The general structure of the outflow is similar to that inferred for the BN/KL region in the Orion Nebula. Key words: Accretion, accretion discs MHD galaxies: jets Lucek & Bell (1996, 1997) use two- and three-dimensional ideal MHD models to study the formation and stability of pressure-driven jets collimated by poloidal magnetic field, which has a minimum inside the jet. Another type of model was developed by Ustyugova et al. (1995), Romanova et al. (1997, 1998), Ouyed, Pudritz & Stone (1997) and Ouyed & Pudritz (1997, 1999) who consider ideal MHD in the corona permeated by an external poloidal magnetic field and subsume the physics of the accretion disc into boundary conditions at the base of the corona. The disc is assumed to be in Keplerian rotation. The corona is non-rotating initially, and the system is driven by matter injection from the disc. Many of these models develop a steady state with a magneto-centrifugal wind (Blandford & Payne 1982) collimated by a toroidal magnetic field, which again is produced in the corona by the vertical shear in the angular velocity. Our model is based on the resistive compressible MHD equations supplemented with an alpha-effect term (Parker 1979, Krause & Rädler 1980) confined to the disc to simulate dynamo action there. Gas density is low above the disc and magnetic field reconnection is assumed to heat the corona to virial temperatures. This is modelled by an increased entropy outside the disc. The hot corona does not rotate initially. The disc is cold and is mostly centrifugally supported, so its rotation is nearly Keplerian. The corresponding steady-state solution is used as our initial condition. This solution is, however, unstable because of the vertical shear in the angular velocity between the disc and the corona (Urpin & Brandenburg 1998). As a result, a meridional flow develops, which exchanges matter between the corona and the disc surface layers. Local mass losses in the disc are then replenished from deeper layers within the disc c 0000 RAS
L2 A. Brandenburg et al. where we allow local mass production whenever and wherever the density decreases below a reference value. Angular momentum transfer by viscous stresses also leads to a departure from the initial state. Matter is heated as it moves into the corona; this leads to overpressure which drives the wind. Strong toroidal magnetic fields produced by the dynamo in the disc are advected into the corona and contribute to confining the wind. 2 THE MODEL A simple way to implement a dense, relatively cool disc embedded in a rarefied, hot corona without modelling the detailed physics of accretion and coronal heating is to prescribe a specific entropy distribution s(r) such that s is small within the disc and large in the corona. For a perfect gas with p = K γ and K = exp(s/c v), this implies that K is a function of position (here p and are gas pressure and density, γ = c p/c v, and c p and c v are the specific heats). Our intention is to make our model as simple as possible and to avoid detailed modelling of accretion. Therefore, we introduce a mass source in order to compensate for the mass loss from the disc, so that the continuity equation becomes + ( u) = q, (1) t where u is the velocity field. The mass source is localized in the disc, and turns on once the local density drops below the equilibrium value, 0, i.e. q = ξ(r) { 0 for < 0, (2) 0 for 0. τ Here, τ is a relaxation time which is chosen to be shorter than the other time scales in the problem, and ξ is a profile that confines the mass production to the disc (see below). Note that we do not fix the distribution and magnitude of q beforehand, but the system adjusts itself such as to prevent the disc from disappearing. We use enthalpy, h = c pt, for a perfect gas, where T is temperature. Enthalpy and gravitational potential Φ combine into the new variable h + Φ (potential enthalpy), and the momentum equation takes the form Du Dt = (h + Φ) + T s + 1 [F + (u0 u)q ], (3) where D/Dt = / t + u, F = J B + τ is the sum of the Lorentz and viscous forces, J = B/µ 0 is the current density due to the (mean) magnetic field B, µ 0 is the magnetic permeability, τ is the viscous stress tensor, and u 0 is the velocity of the injected mass. To ensure that B is solenoidal, we evolve the induction equation written in terms of the vector potential A, A t = u B + αb ηµ0j, (4) where B = A is the mean magnetic field and µ 0J = A 2 A. The term αb drives the mean-field dynamo. We consider axisymmetric solutions of Eqs. (1) (4) and adopt cylindrical polar coordinates (, ϕ, z). [Instead of Eq. (1) we actually evolve an equation for the potential enthalpy.] The field in the disc is generated by a standard α 2 Ω- dynamo, where α(, z) is antisymmetric about the midplane and vanishing outside the disc. Hence, we adopt α = α 0 z z 0 ξ(,z), (5) 1 + va 2 /v2 0 where v A = B( µ 0) 1/2 is the Alfvén speed and v 0 is a free parameter that controls the field strength in the disc. The profile ξ(r) defines the disc, ξ(,z) = g ( 0, d) g ( z z 0, d), (6) where g(x,d) is a smoothed Heaviside step function with a smoothing half-width d set to 8 grid zones. So, ξ(r) is equal to unity deep in the disc and vanishes in the corona. For the magnetic diffusivity we assume η = η 0 + η t(, z), where η 0 is a uniform background value and the turbulent part η t = η t0ξ(r) vanishes outside the disc. With this we define the polytrope parameter K to be large in the corona and small in the disc, [K(, z)] 1/γ = 1 (1 β)ξ, (7) where β is a free parameter that controls the entropy contrast between the disc and the corona. We always adopt β = 0.1, producing an entropy contrast of s/c p = 2.3. Our initial state is a hydrostatic equilibrium obtained by integrating, for h, the vertical balance equation s (h + Φ) T z z = 0 from large values of z (where h + Φ = 0) down to z = 0. The initial density distribution 0 is obtained from γ 1 = (1 γ 1 )h/k. The initial rotation velocity, u ϕ0, follows from the radial equilibrium equation u 2 ϕ0 = (h s + Φ) T. In the disc, h = c pt is small, so u ϕ0 is close to the Keplerian value, while the corona does not rotate initially. Matter is injected into the disc at the equilibrium velocity u 0 = ϕu ϕ0. We use a softened gravitational potential of the form Φ = GM (r n + r n 0 ) 1/n, (8) where r = 2 + z 2 is the spherical radius, r 0 is the softening radius, and n = 5. We use dimensionless variables based on the units [ ] = 0, [u] = c s0, [x] = GMc 2 s0, [B] = c s0(µ 0 0) 1/2, where c s is the speed of sound, c 2 s = γp/ = (γ 1)h. Typical parameters for protostellar outflows are c s0 = 10 2 km/s, corresponding to T = 7 10 5 K, and M = M, so [x] = 0.1 AU, and [t] = [x]/[u] 1 d. A typical disc surface density is σ 0 = 1gcm 2, so [ ] = σ 0/[x] = 8 10 13 g cm 3, [B] = 30G, and [Ṁ] = GMσ0/cs0 = 2 10 7 M yr 1. Since K = 1 in the corona, see Eq. (7), p 0 and 0 are characteristic of the base of the corona. For our reference model, we use 0 = 1.5, z 0 = 0.15, r 0 = 0.05, β = 0.1, α 0 = 0.3, η t0 = 10 3, η 0 = 5 10 4, and v 0 = 3c s. Note that the softening radius r 0 corresponds to 7 10 10 cm, i.e. one solar radius. With 0 = 1.5 and z 0 = 0.15 we have a disc aspect ratio of 0.1. We take γ = 5/3 and τ = 0.1 The kinematic viscosity has been adopted as ν = 0.02(v 2 A +c 2 s +u 2 ) 1/2 δx+ν shock, where δx is the mesh size, and ν shock is a shock viscosity that differs from zero only in flow convergence regions. An artificial
Pressure-driven outflow from a dynamo active disc L3 Figure 2. Profiles of vertical velocity and sound speed along the axis, = 0, for the smoothing radius r 0 = 0.05 in the nonmagnetic model of Fig. 1 (dotted) and two runs with magnetic fields, r 0 = 0.05 as in Fig. 3 (solid) and 0.02 (dashed). The shaded area marks the location of the disc. Terminal wind speeds are reached after approximately two disc heights. Both magnetic field and deeper potential well (smaller r 0 ) result in faster outflows. Figure 1. A nonmagnetic model: velocity vectors and logarithmically spaced density contours (0.008 to 6000, factor 1.6) superimposed on a grey scale representation of h at t = 223. (h = 1 corresponds to T 3 10 5 K.) Darker shades indicates lower temperature. Notice hot gas near the central object and in the near corona, and cooler gas in the disc and the far halo. The dashed line shows the sonic surface where the poloidal velocity equals c s. diffusion term has been included in the evolution equation for the potential enthalpy. We use third order Runge-Kutta time-stepping and a sixth order finite-difference scheme in space with δx = 0.01 in Figs. 1 4 and 0.02 in Fig. 5. in both and z. On the outer boundaries, the induction equation is evolved using one-sided derivatives (open boundary conditions). The normal velocity component has zero normal derivative at the boundary, but is required to be always directed outwards. The tangential velocity components and potential enthalpy on the boundaries are similarly obtained from the next two points away from the boundary. Regularity conditions are adopted on the axis. Computations have been carried out in domains ranging from (, z) [0, 2] [ 1,1] to [0, 8] [ 2, 30], but the results are hardly different in the overlapping parts of the domains. 3 RESULTS We illustrate in Fig. 1 results obtained without any magnetic fields. A strong outflow develops even in this case, driven mostly by the vertical pressure gradient in the transition layer between the disc and the corona, in particular by the term T s in Eq. (3). The gain in velocity is controlled by the total entropy difference between the disc and the corona, but not by the thickness of the transition layer 2d. The flow is fastest along the rotation axis within a cone of polar angle of around 25, where the terminal velocity u z 3 is reached. Collimation is partly due to obstruction from the dense disc, making it easier for the matter to leave the disc along the vertical. Both temperature and density in non-magnetic runs are reduced in the high speed cone. We found that deeper potential wells, i.e. smaller values of r 0 Figure 3. Velocity vectors and poloidal magnetic field lines are shown superimposed on temperature distribution (in terms of h) represented by shades of grey for a run with magnetic field for α 0 = 0.3 at t = 255. By contrast to the non-magnetic case of Fig. 1, now the inner cone is warmer and denser than its exterior. The dashed line shows the fast magnetosonic surface. in Eq. (8), result in faster flows (Fig. 2), and larger opening angles. In the presence of magnetic fields, temperature and density are enhanced within the inner cone (Fig. 3). This is a consequence of magnetic pressure, which is strongest outside the inner cone. The outflow becomes more vigorous, u z 4 within the cone (see Fig. 2). In this model we have chosen α 0 < 0, consistent with recent results from simulations of dynamo-driven disc turbulence (Brandenburg et al. 1995, Ziegler & Rüdiger 2000). The resulting field geometry is roughly dipolar, which is typical of αω disc dynamos with α < 0 (e.g., Stepinski & Levy 1988, Brandenburg, Tuominen & Krause 1990). As expected, α 0 > 0 results in mostly quadrupolar fields; see Fig. 4.
L4 A. Brandenburg et al. Figure 4. As in Fig. 3, but for α 0 = +0.3, t = 132. The magnetic field geometry is now roughly quadrupolar. For α 0 < 0, the critical value of α 0 for dynamo action is between 0.1 and 0.2, which is a factor of ten larger than without the outflow. Thus, our dynamo is only about twice supercritical. A survey of the dynamo regimes for this model will be presented elsewhere (von Rekowski et al. 2000). Our results are insensitive to the size of the computational domain: we illustrate this in Fig. 5 with a larger domain of a size [0, 8] [ 2, 30]. The initial magnetic field (poloidal, mixed parity) is weak (P m B 2 /2µ 0 10 5 ), but the dynamo soon amplifies the field in the disc to P m 10 3, and then supplies it to the corona. As a result, the corona is filled by a predominantly azimuthal field with P m 10 4 ; see Fig. 6. We note, however, that the flow in the corona varies significantly in both space and time (see movie at URL http://antares.ncl.ac.uk/ dobler/projects/winds/) The magnetic pressure exceeds the gas pressure in the corona outside the inner cone. The main mechanisms producing B ϕ in the corona are advection by the wind and magnetic buoyancy (cf. Moss, Shukurov & Sokoloff 1999). Magnetic diffusion and stretching of the poloidal field by the vertical shear play a relatively unimportant rôle. The mass loss rate in the wind fluctuates on a time scale of 5 time units, but remains constant on average at a level of about 5, or 10 6 M yr 1. The mass in the disc also remains roughly constant. The rate at which mass needs to be replenished in the disc is only about 0.4. This is not controlled by the relaxation rate τ 1, which is 25 times larger. The field in the disc is dominated by the toroidal component; B ϕ / B z 30. However, this ratio is closer to unity at larger radii where magneto-centrifugally driven wind dominates; see Fig. 6. The resulting field geometry (e.g. Fig. 3) is such that the angle between the disc surface, shown with a thin line, and the field lines is less than 60 for > 0.5, which is favourable for magneto-centrifugal acceleration (Blandford & Payne 1982, Campbell 1999). The thermal pressure gradient is the dominant accelerating force for < 0.5. Figure 5. Results for a larger domain [0, 8] [ 2,30] with the same parameters as in Fig. 3, averaged in time between t = 200 and 230. Left panel: velocity vectors, poloidal magnetic field lines and grey scale representation of h in the inner part of the domain. Right panel: poloidal magnetic field and normalized enthalpy h/ Φ in the full domain. Figure 6. Radial profiles of magnetic pressures from the toroidal (solid) and poloidal (dotted) magnetic fields and gas pressure (dashed) for the model of Fig.5. Shown are the averages over the disc volume (lower panel) and over a similar region in the corona around z = 8. The dependence of the radial mass flux density on spherical polar angle is shown in Fig. 7. The fast pressuredriven flow in the inner cone carries most of the mass, whereas the slow magneto-centrifugal wind in the outer parts carries most of the angular momentum and magnetic field. Note that a significant part of angular momentum is carried away in the disc plane whilst magnetic field is ejected at intermediate angles.
Pressure-driven outflow from a dynamo active disc L5 Figure 7. Dependence, on polar angle ϑ, of azimuthally integrated radial mass flux density 2πr 2 u r sinϑ (solid, normalized by the disc mass), angular momentum flux density 2πr 2 u ϕu r sinϑ (dashed-dotted, normalized by the disc angular momentum), and Poynting flux density 2πr 2 (E B) r sinϑ (multiplied by 10, dashed, normalized by the magnetic energy in the disc), for spherical radius r = 8. The units of all three quantities are [t] 1 rad 1. disc because we have restricted ourselves to axisymmetric models. This restriction can be relaxed in three-dimensional simulations. The assumption of a prescribed entropy profile is a useful tool to control the size of the disc. However, it should be relaxed as soon as the disc physics can be described more consistently, in particular by locating the mass source at a large radius, as appropriate, e.g., for Roche lobe overflow. Furthermore, the full energy equation, possibly with radiation transfer, should be included. This would lead to a self-consistent entropy distribution in disc and corona and would allow the deposition of viscous and Ohmic heat in the outflow. In our model there is a significant Poynting flux from the dynamo-active disc. Assuming that this equally applies to protostellar and AGN discs, this result could be important for understanding the origin of seed magnetic fields in galaxies and galaxy clusters; see Brandenburg (2000) for an estimate. The kinetic and magnetic luminosities of the models shown in Figs. 3 and 5 are L kin = 0.65 Ṁc2 and L mag = 0.05 Ṁc2, respectively, where c = 2.8 is the fast magnetosonic speed at the critical surface at = 0. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to R. Henriksen, J. Heyvaerts, R. Ouyed and R. Pudritz for fruitful discussions. This work was partially supported by PPARC (Grant PPA/G/S/1997/00284) and the Leverhulme Trust (Grant F/125/AL). 4 DISCUSSION Our model develops a clearly structured outflow: the flow within an axial cone is dense, fast, hot and has low angular momentum, whereas the outer wind in the equatorial regions is slower but has larger angular momentum. The full opening angle of the cone is about 50. Similar overall features have been inferred by Greenhill et al. (1998) for the BN/KL (or Becklin Neugebauer/Kleinmann Low) region in the Orion Nebula, as traced by SiO and H 2O masers. These authors argue that the outflow has coexisting conical bipolar and equatorial components. The conical outflow, observed out to a distance of 25 60 AU from its origin, has an opening angle of 60, speed exceeding 50km/s, and does apparently not rotate. The material inside the cone should be hot and turbulent to suppress the maser action. The equatorial outflow has an opening angle of 80, speed of 13 km/s at = 200 500 AU and rotation less than a few kms 1 ; it may extend out to 1000 AU. The axial outflow in our model is driven mostly by the prescribed entropy gradient between the disc and the corona. It is important that matter is replenished in the disc in a self-regulatory manner where and when needed. The disc mass quickly drops to low values and the outflow ceases if we put q = 0 in Eqs (1) and (3). The basic features of the outflow (confinement, launching) are only weakly affected by the parity of the magnetic field. We should stress the importance of finite magnetic diffusivity for our model: although the velocity and magnetic fields are well aligned in most of the domain, the matter can only enter the inner cone by crossing magnetic lines. In reality, both dynamo-generated and external magnetic field may be present, so a more comprehensive model could include both in different proportions. We used an α 2 Ω dynamo to represent the magnetic field generation in the REFERENCES Bell A. R. 1994, Phys. Plasmas, 1, 1643 Bell A. R., Lucek S. G., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 1327 Blandford R. D., Payne D. R., 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883 Brandenburg A., 2000, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 358, 759 Brandenburg A., Tuominen I., Krause F., 1990, GAFD, 50, 95 Brandenburg A., Nordlund Å, Stein R. F., Torkelsson U., 1995, ApJ, 446, 741 Campbell C. G., 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1175 Greenhill L. J., Gwinn C. R., Schwartz C., Moran J. M., Diamond P. J., 1998, Nat, 396, 650 Krause F., Rädler K.-H., 1980, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin Hawley J. F., Gammie C. F., Balbus S. A., 1996, ApJ, 464, 690 Königl A., Pudritz R., 1999, in Mannings V., Boss A., Russell S., eds, Protostars and Planets III. Univ. Arizona Press Kudoh T., Matsumoto R., Shibata K., 1998, ApJ, 508, 186 Lucek S. G., Bell A. R., 1996, MNRAS, 281, 245 Lucek S. G., Bell A. R., 1997, MNRAS, 290, 327 Matsumoto R., Uchida Y., Hirose S., Shibata K., Hayashi M.R., Ferrari A., Bodo G., Norman C., 1996, ApJ, 461, 115 Mestel L., 1999, Stellar Magnetism. Clarendon Press, Oxford Moss D., Shukurov A., Sokoloff D., 1999, A&A, 343, 120 Ouyed R., Pudritz R. E., 1997, ApJ, 482, 712; 484, 794 Ouyed R., Pudritz R. E., 1999, MNRAS, 309, 233 Ouyed R., Pudritz R. E., Stone J. M., 1997, Nature, 385, 409 Parker E. N., 1979, Cosmical Magnetic Fields. Pergamon, Oxford Pudritz R., 1981, MNRAS 195, 881; 195, 897 Romanova M. M., Ustyugova G. V., Koldoba A. V., Chechetkin V. M., Lovelace R. V. E., 1997, ApJ, 482, 708 Romanova M. M., Ustyugova G. V., Koldoba A. V., Chechetkin V. M., Lovelace R. V. E., 1998, ApJ, 500, 703 Stepinski T., Levy E. H., 1988, ApJ, 331, 416 Stone J. M., Norman M. L., 1994, ApJ, 433, 746 Uchida Y., Shibata K., 1985, PASJ, 37, 515 Urpin V., Brandenburg A., 1998, MNRAS, 294, 399
L6 A. Brandenburg et al. Ustyugova G. V., Koldoba A. V., Romanova M. M., Chechetkin V. M., Lovelace R. V. E., 1995, ApJ, 439, L39 von Rekowski B., Brandenburg A., Dobler W., Shukurov A., 2000, in preparation Ziegler U., Rüdiger G., 2000, A&A, in press