Production of Beryllium and Boron by Spallation in Supernova Ejecta

Similar documents
Light Element Nucleosynthesis: The Li-Be-B Story

In the Beginning. After about three minutes the temperature had cooled even further, so that neutrons were able to combine with 1 H to form 2 H;

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

The role of gravitational supernovae in the Galactic evolution of the Li, Be and B isotopes

The origin of the light elements in the early Universe

Cosmic Rays - R. A. Mewaldt - California Institute of Technology

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

Cosmic Rays. This showed that the energy of cosmic rays was many times that of any other natural or artificial radiation known at that time.

Evolution and nucleosynthesis prior to the AGB phase

Nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae. Almudena Arcones

Comparing a Supergiant to the Sun

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2004

Chapter CHAPTER 11 ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Type II Supernovae Overwhelming observational evidence that Type II supernovae are associated with the endpoints of massive stars: Association with

Neutrinos and explosive nucleosynthesis

The positron and antiproton fluxes in Cosmic Rays

Nucleosynthesis. W. F. McDonough 1. Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai , Japan. (Dated: Tuesday 24 th April, 2018)

Nuclear Astrophysics - I

THE ENERGY OF STARS NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS THE ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS

arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2016

Lecture 15. Explosive Nucleosynthesis and the r-process

Cosmic rays. 1.1 Origin and nature of cosmic rays

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays from Tidal Disruption Events: Origin, Survival, and Implications

ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENETS

LiBeB, O and Fe Evolution: Refractory Element and Cosmic Ray Transport Delays

PHY320 Class Test Topic 1 Elemental Abundances All questions are worth 1 mark unless otherwise stated

PHYS 420: Astrophysics & Cosmology

Stellar Interior: Physical Processes

Cosmic Rays. Discovered in 1912 by Viktor Hess using electroscopes to measure ionization at altitudes via balloon

GALACTIC Al 1.8 MeV GAMMA-RAY SURVEYS WITH INTEGRAL

Chapter 4. Galactic Chemical Evolution. 4.1 Introduction. 4.2 Chemical Abundances

CHEM 312: Lecture 9 Part 1 Nuclear Reactions

Cosmic Rays & Magnetic Fields

Nuclear Astrophysics

Nobuya Nishimura Keele University, UK

Secondary particles generated in propagation neutrinos gamma rays

Topic 7. Relevance to the course

Nuclear Reactions and Astrophysics: a (Mostly) Qualitative Introduction

The Origin of the Elements between Iron and the Actinides Probes for Red Giants and Supernovae

Beryllium A Cosmic Chronometer? Carolyn Peruta Mentor: Ann Boesgaard. 1. Introduction

Nuclear Astrophysics

W 1996/9 FEVRIER 1996

14 Supernovae (short overview) introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

Perspectives on Nuclear Astrophysics

R Process Nucleosynthesis And Its Site. Mario A. Riquelme Theore<cal Seminar Fall 2009

Galactic cosmic rays propagation

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 25 Jun 2000

Supernova Nucleosynthesis

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Abundance Constraints on Early Chemical Evolution. Jim Truran

PHYS 420: Astrophysics & Cosmology

Cosmic Rays. M. Swartz. Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Nucleosynthesis Process. Ba: s-process Ag, Eu: r-process

Cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium

:Lecture 27: Stellar Nucleosynthesis. Cassieopia A

IB Test. Astrophysics HL. Name_solution / a) Describe what is meant by a nebula [1]

This paper should be understood as an extended version of a talk given at the

the astrophysical formation of the elements

Friday, April 29, 2011

Stellar Nucleosynthesis

Interactions of Particulate Radiation with Matter. Purpose. Importance of particulate interactions

Theory for nuclear processes in stars and nucleosynthesis

Astrochemistry. Special course in astronomy 53855, 5 op. Jorma Harju, Julien Montillaud, Olli Sipilä. Department of Physics

> News < AMS-02 will be launched onboard the Shuttle Endeavour On May 2nd 2:33 P.M. from NASA Kennedy space center!

James Maxwell ( )

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 10 Jan 2006

Cosmic Ray Transport (in the Galaxy) Luke Drury. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Institiúid Ard-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath

High Energy Particle Production by Space Plasmas

High-precision (p,t) reactions to determine reaction rates of explosive stellar processes Matić, Andrija

Neutron-to-proton ratio

What is Spallation???

Zach Meisel, PAN 2016

Astrophysical Nucleosynthesis

Scientific goal in Nuclear Astrophysics is to explore:

The Content of the Universe, and how we get heavy elements.

The role of neutrinos in the formation of heavy elements. Gail McLaughlin North Carolina State University

Nuclear Burning in Astrophysical Plasmas

Lecture 14 Cosmic Rays

- ι. λγί SUPERNOVAE AND CALIFORNIUM 254*

Simulating Gamma-Ray Telescopes in Space Radiation Environments with Geant4: Detector Activation

A Detailed Look at Cas A: Progenitor, Explosion & Nucleosynthesis

² The universe observed ² Relativistic world models ² Reconstructing the thermal history ² Big bang nucleosynthesis ² Dark matter: astrophysical

Chapter 6. Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae. The explosion of a core-collapse supernova leads to ejection of the star s mantle, and thus

High Mass Stars. Dr Ken Rice. Discovering Astronomy G

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 30 Nov 1998

6 Neutrons and Neutron Interactions

Supernova Remnants and Cosmic. Rays

Nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Almudena Arcones Helmholtz Young Investigator Group

Astronomy Ch. 21 Stellar Explosions. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Stars and their properties: (Chapters 11 and 12)

The role of ionization in the shock acceleration theory

Beryllium and boron in metal-poor stars

Nucleosynthesis after frequency shifting in electromagnetic radiation near gravitating masses in Dynamic Universe Model

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

R-process in Low Entropy Neutrino Driven Winds

Nucleosynthesis in Core Collapse Supernovae: Knowns and Unknown. Friedrich-K. Thielemann Dept. of Physics University of Basel

Astronomy 104: Stellar Astronomy

Transcription:

Production of Beryllium and Boron by Spallation in Supernova Ejecta Deepa Majmudar 1, James H. Applegate 2 arxiv:astro-ph/9708010v1 1 Aug 1997 1:Dept. of Physics, Columbia University, 538 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 2:Dept. of Astronomy, Columbia University, 538 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 Abstract. The abundances of beryllium and boron have been measured in halo stars of metallicities as low as [Fe/H] =-3. The observations show that the ratios Be/Fe and B/Fe are independent of metallicity and approximately equal to their solar values over the entire range of observed metallicity. These observations are in contradiction with the predictions of simple models of beryllium and boron production by spallation in the interstellar medium of a well mixed galaxy. We propose that beryllium and boron are produced by spallation in the ejecta of type II supernovae. In our picture, protons and alpha particles are accelerated early in the supernova event and irradiate the heavy elements in the ejecta long before the ejecta mixes with the interstellar medium. We follow the propagation of the accelerated particles with a Monte-Carlo code and find that the energy per spallation reaction is about 5 GeV for a variety of initial particle spectra and ejecta compositions. Reproducing the observed Be/Fe and B/Fe ratios requires roughly 3 10 47 ergs of accelerated protons and alphas. This is much less than the 10 51 ergs available in a supernova explosion. INTRODUCTION Spallation reactions involving protons or alpha particles colliding with the nuclei of the abundant light elements carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen have long been recognized as important or dominant contributors to the production of the isotopes of lithium, beryllium, and boron (Reeves, Fowler & Hoyle 1970). Evidence for this picture includes the fact that the ratios of abundances of spallation products are equal to the ratios of the production cross sections, the large overabundance of spallation products in cosmic rays, and the fact that the observed cosmic ray flux irradiating a poulation I composition for the age of the galaxy produces the observed spallation to CNO abundance ratio. For a summary of these arguments see the review by Reeves (1982). Spallation nucleosynthesis in the interstellar medium of a well mixed galaxy is very inefficient if the metallicity of the gas is low. In the simplest closed

box model of galactic chemical evolution, the abundance of spallation products is proportional to the square of the iron abundance at low metallicity. This prediction is contradicted by the observations of beryllium and boron abundances in low metallicity stars (Duncan et al. 1992, Gilmore et al. 1992, Boesgaard 1996) which show that the Be/Fe and B/Fe ratios are independent of metallicity and approximately equal to their solar values for stars in the metallicity range -1>[Fe/H]>-3. To account for these observations we propose that spallation nucleosynthesis took place in the supernova event itself. In our model, particles are accelerated and irradiate the CNO nuclei in the supernova ejecta long before the ejecta mixes with the interstellar medium of the early galaxy. We follow the propagation of the accelerated particles with a Monte-Carlo analysis and find that reproducing the observed spallation to iron ratio requires about 3 10 47 ergs to go into accelerating particles. We also find, not surprisingly, that we produce the same isotopic ratios as are found in calculations which irradiate a solar composition interstellar medium. MODEL DESCRIPTION & RESULTS A supernova releases a large amount (10 51 ergs) of energy as it explodes. A fraction of this energy may go into accelerating particles to very high energies. The type II supernova ejecta are rich in CNO nuclei which serve as targets for spallation by energetic protons and α particles that are accelerated in the expanding ejecta. We have modelled the spallation production of Li, Be and B in supernova ejecta by writing a Monte-Carlo simulation. The program takes as its input the spectrum of accelerated particles (p, α) in supernova explosion and irradiates the ejecta (CNO) of specified composition and density with these particles. In the simulation, the accelerated particles start out with initial energy as specified by the spectrum and have elastic, inelastic or spallation collisions based on the probability of that collision according to their relative cross sections and target abundance. The energy dependent cross-sections for these collisions are taken from the compilations by Read & Viola (1984) and Meyer (1971). The main energy loss processes for these accelerated particles are by spallation, ionization and elastic/inelastic collisions. Protons go through TABLE 1. E sp (GeV) for various E c (MeV) and n, calculated for a 25M supernova composition E c (MeV) = 50 100 200 500 n=5 6.3 4.3 5.4 9.6 n=10 4.3 4.2 4.9 8.6

elastic and inelastic collisions with other protons and He nuclei in the ejecta and spallation reactions with CNO nuclei. In the case of a proton-proton or a proton-α elastic collision, the incident proton loses energy to the stationary target and accelerates the target proton or α particle. This creates a cascade of accelerated particles, each of which in turn goes through a sequence of collisions. The energy loss suffered by the incident proton in a proton-proton elastic collision is calculated kinematically using differential cross sections for elastic scattering (Meyer 1971). The proton-proton inelastic collision, p + p π 0 + p + p, produces π 0 s which decay as π 0 γ + γ, producing gammaray flux. The remaining energy after π 0 production is shared between the two outgoing protons. The proton-α inelastic collision produces secondary particles (d, 3 He) that are not relevent to our simulation and the incident proton is assumed to lose all its energy. Spallation between protons and CNO produces one of the light element isotopes according to their relative cross sections (p + CNO 6 Li, 7 Li, 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B). Protons also lose energy by ionization in passing through the ejecta. These losses begin to dominate at lower energies. When the ionization energy loss is much greater ( 50 times) than the energy loss by other collisions (spallation, elastic and inelastic), the proton is assumed to lose all its energy by ionization and doesn t suffer any more collisions. Similar treatment is applied to accelerated α particles. In this case, the spallation reactions are α + α 6 Li, 7 Li and α + CNO 6 Li, 7 Li, 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B. The simulation is run for various accelerated particle spectra and compositions of irradiated material. The compositions of 15M, 25M and 35M supernova ejecta (Weaver & Woosley 1993) are used as irradiated material distributed uniformly in a sphere of radius of 10 15 cm. The source spectrum of TABLE 2. Results for E c = 100 MeV/nucleon, power law index n = 5 calculated for various supernova masses 15M 25M 35M Observed B/Be 16.4 12.9 12.5 10-20 1 11 B/ 10 B 2.6 2.5 2.5 4.0 2 7 Li/ 6 Li 1.5 1.5 1.6 12.6 2 6 Li/ 9 Be 3.7 3.0 2.7 3.7 2 N π0 2.0x10 47 6.5x10 46 4.4x10 46 E sp (GeV) 8.7 4.3 3.9 1. Duncan et al. (1992) 2. Cameron (1982) TABLE 3. Number of π 0 s produced for various E c (MeV) and n, calculated for 25M supernova E c =50 100 200 500 n=5 0 6.5x10 46 1.5x10 48 2.8x10 49 n=10 0 0 3.4x10 46 1.8x10 49

20 15 10 5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Ecutoff(MeV) FIGURE 1. B/Be and 11 B/ 10 B for various cutoff energies (E c ) and power law index n using 25M supernova composition accelerated particles is described as constant (flat spectrum) up to a certain cutoff energy E c and at energies E > E c, a power law decrease by index n. We use various cutoff energies (E c = 50 MeV-500 MeV/nucleon) and power law indices (n = 2-10) and compare the results. We calculate the total number of light element isotopes ( 6 Li, 7 Li, 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B)producedbyspallationintheirradiatedejecta, thetotalnumber ofelastic and inelastic collisions and the energy needed per spallation (E sp ). We find the energy per spallation (E sp ) to be in the range of 1-10 GeV, as shown in Table 1. The value of E sp is higher in the case of E c = 500 MeV/nucleon because the number of inelastic collisions is dramatically increased as the accelerated particle spectrum extends well beyond the 280 MeV threshold for inelastic collisions. Using the Solar abundances (Cameron 1982), corrected for 7 Li to account for its production in the big bang nucleosynthesis, we get the total number of spallations per 56 Fe nucleus as 2.6 10 5. The total amount of 56 Fe ejected from a supernova is taken as 0.07M, as observed in SN1987A (Erickson et al. 1988). Therefore the total number of spallations per supernova required for light element production is 3.9 10 49. Using 5 GeV as the value of energy per spallation, we get the total energy required as 3 10 47 ergs. A typical supernova releases about 10 51 ergs, so only a small fraction of the total energy needs to be directed towards spallation reactions.

The variation of B/Be and 11 B/ 10 B ratios with cutoff energy E c and power law index n are shown in Fig. 1. The isotopic ratios 11 B/ 10 B, 6 Li/ 9 Be, 7 Li/ 6 Li and B/Be, the number of π 0 s produced as a result of p-p inelastic collision and the energy required per spallation (E sp ), calculated for supernova masses of 15M, 25M and 35M with accelerated particle spectrum as E c = 100MeV/nucleon, index n = 5 are shown in Table 2. The observed isotopic ratios are also shown for comparison. The B/Be ratio is recently observed in several Halo Dwarfs (Duncan et al. 1992, Boesgaard 1996) and is found to be in the vicinity of 10, which is consistent with our calculations. The Solar 11 B/ 10 B ratio of 4 is higher than our calculated value of 2.5. There may be other sources of 11 B production, such as neutrino induced nucleosynthesis in a type II supernova (Woosley et al. 1990), giving us the high 11 B/ 10 B ratio. The energy required per spallation decreases with increasing supernova mass because the H/CNO ratio decreases with increasing supernova mass and so there are more spallation collisions and fewer elastic/inelastic collisions, thus utilizing more of the energy for spallation. For the same reason the number of π 0 s produced decreases with increasing supernova mass. Table 3 shows the number of π 0 s produced for various cutoff energies E c and index n, calculated for a 25M supernova composition. The threshold for π 0 production is at 280 MeV, so for certain accelerated particle spectra we get no pion production. The π 0 s subsequently decay producing two γ rays at energies centered around 70 MeV. REFERENCES 1. Boesgaard, A., Formation of the Galactic Halo...Inside and Out, ASP Series, Vol. 92, 327 (1996) 2. Cameron, A. G. W., Essays in Nuclear Astrophysics, eds. C. Barnes, D. Clayton, and D. N. Schramm, (Cambridge University Press) (1982) 3. Duncan, D., Lambert, D., and Lemke, M., ApJ, 401, 584 (1992) 4. Erickson, E. F., Haas, M. R., Colgan S. W. J., Lord, S. D., Burton, M. G., Wolf, J., Hollenbach, D. J., Werner, M., ApJL, 330, L39 (1988) 5. Gilmore, G., Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., and Nissen, P. E., Nature, 401, 584 (1992) 6. Meyer, J. P., A & A Suppl., 7, 417 (1971) 7. Read, S. M., and Viola, V. E. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 31, 359 (1984) 8. Reeves, H., Fowler, W. & Hoyle, F., Nature, 226, 227 (1970) 9. Weaver, T.A., and Woosley, S.E., Physical Reports, 227, 65M (1993) 10. Woosley, S.E., Hartmann, D. H., Hoffman, R. D., and Haxton, W. C., ApJ, 356, 272 (1990)