Localization of e ective actions in OSFT - Applications and Future Developments

Similar documents
Instanton effective action in - background and D3/D(-1)-brane system in R-R background

Anomalous Strong Coupling

Techniques for exact calculations in 4D SUSY gauge theories

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 5 Feb 2004

Little strings and T-duality

Instantons in (deformed) gauge theories from strings

Quantum gravity at one-loop and AdS/CFT

The boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya

Connecting the ambitwistor and the sectorized heterotic strings

Gravity vs Yang-Mills theory. Kirill Krasnov (Nottingham)

Matrix Theories and Emergent Space

Towards a cubic closed string field theory

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Jul 2003

Week 11 Reading material from the books

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 20 Mar 2012

A Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence

MHV Diagrams and Tree Amplitudes of Gluons

1/N Expansions in String and Gauge Field Theories. Adi Armoni Swansea University

Quantising Gravitational Instantons

String-Theory: Open-closed String Moduli Spaces

Non-Supersymmetric Seiberg duality Beyond the Planar Limit

Strings on AdS 3 S 3 S 3 S 1

New solutions for any open string background

Curriculum Vitae of Marialuisa FRAU

F o rce s U n i v e rs e

String Theory and The Velo-Zwanziger Problem

Warped Models in String Theory

Introduction to defects in Landau-Ginzburg models

CFTs with O(N) and Sp(N) Symmetry and Higher Spins in (A)dS Space

On the curious spectrum of duality-invariant higher-derivative gravitational field theories

The Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach)

BPS non-local operators in AdS/CFT correspondence. Satoshi Yamaguchi (Seoul National University) E. Koh, SY, arxiv: to appear in JHEP

MHV Vertices and On-Shell Recursion Relations

Possible Advanced Topics Course

A New Regulariation of N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

Covariant Gauges in String Field Theory

Complete action of open superstring field theory

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FERMIONIZATION AND SUPERSTRING MODEL BUILDING

AdS/CFT duality. Agnese Bissi. March 26, Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice. Mathematical Institute University of Oxford

Instantonic effects in N=1 local models from magnetized branes

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions

A Review of Solitons in Gauge Theories. David Tong

The Mandelstam Leibbrandt prescription and the Discretized Light Front Quantization.

The Randall-Sundrum model

Black Hole dynamics at large D

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

M-theory S-Matrix from 3d SCFT

Théorie des cordes: quelques applications. Cours II: 4 février 2011

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

Why Supersymmetry is Different

8.821 F2008 Lecture 5: SUSY Self-Defense

First Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 29 Sep 2008

Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates

The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology

Spectral flow as a map between (2,0) models

BPS states, permutations and information

Chern-Simons Theories and AdS/CFT

F-theory effective physics via M-theory. Thomas W. Grimm!! Max Planck Institute for Physics (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)! Munich

Bremsstrahlung function for ABJM theory based on work in progress with L. Griguolo, M. Preti and D. Seminara

New Phenomena in 2d String Theory

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 21 Nov 2018

SM, EWSB & Higgs. MITP Summer School 2017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders. Homework & Exercises

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

A Comment on String Solitons

1 September 1997 PEG Event-Symmetry for Superstrings. Philip E. Gibbs

Four-point functions in the AdS/CFT correspondence: Old and new facts. Emery Sokatchev

Superstring in the plane-wave background with RR-flux as a conformal field theory

1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

SMALL INSTANTONS IN STRING THEORY

Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory

Pietro Fre' SISSA-Trieste. Paolo Soriani University degli Studi di Milano. From Calabi-Yau manifolds to topological field theories

3. Open Strings and D-Branes

Scalar particles. Axel Maas. 7 th of May 2010 Delta 2010 Heidelberg Germany

Is N=8 Supergravity Finite?

Quantum Nambu Geometry in String Theory

Twistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity. Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/

A Solvable Irrelevant

Non-rational CFT and String bound states

Coset CFTs, high spin sectors and non-abelian T-duality

On the Phenomenology of Four Dimensional Gepner Models

Glueballs at finite temperature from AdS/QCD

Supergravity from 2 and 3-Algebra Gauge Theory

HIGHER SPIN CORRECTIONS TO ENTANGLEMENT ENTROPY

Aspects of (0,2) theories

One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT

Quantum Field Theory. Kerson Huang. Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition WILEY- VCH. From Operators to Path Integrals

Some applications of light-cone superspace

Tachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory

String Theory in a Nutshell. Elias Kiritsis

First order string theory and the Kodaira-Spencer equations. Integrable Systems in Quantum Theory Lorentz Center, Leiden, December 2008

SUPERCONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES. John H. Schwarz. Abdus Salam ICTP 10 November 2010

Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory

Chiral matter wavefunctions in warped compactifications

Two-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM

The Non-commutative S matrix

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 May 1994

Twistors and Conformal Higher-Spin. Theory. Tristan Mc Loughlin Trinity College Dublin

Hidden two-higgs doublet model

Transcription:

Localization of e ective actions in OSFT - Applications and Future Developments Alberto Merlano In collaboration with: Carlo Maccaferri Università di Torino, INFN Sezione di Torino and Arnold-Regge Center Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica February, 08 Meeting on String Field Theory and String Phenomenology 08, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad.

Summary of the presentation Recap of the general results (see Carlo s talk, 80.07607) Yang-Mills potential from D(n) branes system Yang-Mills instantons from D3 D( ) branes system Future Directions

Summary of the presentation Recap of the general results (see Carlo s talk, 80.07607) Yang-Mills potential from D(n) branes system Yang-Mills instantons from D3 D( ) branes system Future Directions

Summary of the presentation Recap of the general results (see Carlo s talk, 80.07607) Yang-Mills potential from D(n) branes system Yang-Mills instantons from D3 D( ) branes system Future Directions

Main results (see Carlo s talk) From Berkovits OSFT, the e ective action for a massless field A at the quartic level is S 4 ( A ) = + 8 Tr [[ 0 A, Q B A ] 0 b 0 L 0 [ 0 A, Q B A ]] 4 Tr [[ 0 A, A][ A, Q B A ]]. For consistent and interesting string theory background we can always promote the natural worldsheet N =ton =. (see Sen (986), Banks and Dixon et al.(987-88)) So there is a R-symmetry current j in the matter sector. Assume that the string field is the sum of opposite charged string fields A = (+) A + ( ) A, (±) A = c V (±).

The conservation of the R charge implies that the e ective action localizes in terms of unphysical auxiliary fields such as: µ h P 0[ A, Q B A ] = +A µa c p3 c i p @X i p3 A µa hc i p @X i p3 c = [A µ, A ]c µ (0) 0i. µ p3 where known OPEs of the ghost/superghosts have been used 0 (z) ( z) =+O(z), c(z) c( z) z c@c(0) +

The general structure of the auxiliary fields appearing at the quartic order is h (±±) (±) P 0 [ A, Q B (±) A ]= c H(±) bh (±±) (±) P 0 [ A, 0 (±) A ]=c@c e H (±) g (± ) (±) P 0 [ 0 A, Q B ( ) A ]= c H 0 bg (± ) (±) P 0 [ A, ( ) A ]= c@c @ e H 0. The explicit form of the above string fields is given by the leading OPE between the matter superconformal primaries V ( ) V (±) (z)v (±) (z)v (±) ( z) =H (±) (0) + ( z) V (±) (z)v ( ) ( z) = z H 0 +.

The localized e ective action The ghost/superghost CFT is universal and can be computed. Then we remain with apple S (4) e ( A)=tr hh (+) H ( ) i + 4 hh 0 H 0 i, This is the main result of 80.07607: Choose your string background; the e ective action at the quartic level for the massless fields is given by the BPZ product of the matter part of the auxiliary field. If not for this term, the e ective action would be zero. This matter vertex depends on the chosen string background. So let us analyze two important examples.

Yang-Mills potential:the worldsheet theory The worldsheet theory of a system of N coincident D(n) euclidean branes contains the µ superconformal fields which we rearrange according to a U(n) SO(n) decomposition = p ( j + i j )=e ih j J 0 =+, = p ( j i j )=e ih j J 0 =. with (,, j) =,...,n. The localizing current is given J(z) = nx i @h j (z). j=

Yang-Mills potential: the auxiliary fields The matter vertex is then given V (+) (z) =A (z), V ( ) (z) =A (z), The auxiliary fields are easily extracted from the leading term in the OPE H (+) (z) = [A ı, A ] ı (z), H ( ) (z) = [A ī, A ] ī (z), H 0 (z) = [A, A ]. where ı (z) : ı :(z). The e ective action is then easily computed from apple S (4) e ( A) = tr hh (+) H ( ) i + 4 hh 0 H 0 i

Yang-Mills potential apple S (4) e ( A) = tr [A ı, A ][Aī, A ]+ 4 [A, A ][Aī, A ı ]. The N N matrices A, A are related to the original A µ s by A = µ A µ A = µ A µ, where non-vanishing entries are j = p = j nx = j = i p = µ = ( µ i µ ). Thus, the Y-M potential is correctly reproduced S (4) e = j. 8 tr [[A µ, A ][A µ, A ]].

Y-M Instantons: the worldsheet theory of D3 D( ) The total massless string field is given by A! A(z) =c (z),! a where A(z) =A µ µ (z)+ p p (z),!(z) =! N k!(z) =! k N S (z), S (z), a(z) =a µ µ (z)+ p p (z). Greek indices µ label the directions along the D3 branes, roman indices p label the transverse directions while SO(4) spinor indices are (, )and(, ).

Benefits of the Localization Certainly we can compute this e ective action using the Berkovits quartic e ective action, but for the instanton potential it requires 4 point functions of (excited) twist fields which are not even well known in the literature. The most challenging one is roughly given: Tr [[ 0 A, Q B A ] 0 b 0 L 0 [ 0 A, Q B A ]] h µ (z ) (z ) (z 3 ) (z 4 )i. So it is easy to appreciate how localization avoids this problems reducing all the computation to a point function.

Yang-Mills Instantons: Gauge Boson The worldsheet theory contains the µ superconformal fields which we rearrange as before A = A (+) + A ( ) + (+) + ( ), a = a (+) + a ( ) + (+) + ( ), where using the same notation of previous example A (+) = A, A ( ) = A, (+) = m m, ( ) = m m, The same also for a. Here =, and =, indices denote respectively the fundamental and antifundamental representation of SU() SO(4), while m =,, 3and m =,, 3 indices denote respectively the fundamental and antifundamental representation of SU(3) SO(6).

Yang-Mills Instantons: Stretched strings The worldsheet theory contains also the composite S and S which are superconformal primaries of weight.spin fields are defined through bosonization by the scalars h, h S (, ) = e i (h +h ), S (, ) = e i (h +h ) J 0 S (, ) =+S (, ), J 0 S (, ) = S (, ). Finally we can decompose the o -diagonal part of V where! =! (+) +! ( ),! =! (+) +! ( )! (+) =! S (, ),! ( ) =! S (, ) as! (+) =! S (, ),! ( ) =! S (, ).

Yang-Mills Instantons - Auxiliary fields The auxiliary fields H 0, H (+), H ( ) along the D3 branes are H (+)D3 [A, A = ]+!! 0 0 [a, a ]!! 0i, H ( )D3 = [A, A ]+!! 0 0 [a, a ]!! 0i, H D3 0 = [A, A ] (!! +!! ) 0 0i. 0 [a, a ]+(!! +!! ) Note the absence of o -diagonal terms due to the OPE µ (z) S (w) ( µ ) S (w) p. (z w)

Yang-Mills Instantons - Covariant auxiliary fields At first sight maybe they do not look significant, but after algebraic manipulations involving the ladder t Hooft symbols: µ + µ + i µ, µ µ i µ, it is possible to see that they carry a SU() representation H (+)D3 = i 4 µ T µ 0i,, H ( )D3 =+ i 4 µ + T µ 0i, H D3 0 = i µ 3 T µ 0i. The covariant tensor T µ is given by 0 T µ = [A B µ,a ]+ @! ( µ )! 0 0 [a µ,a ]! ( µ )! C A.

The ADHM constraint and the e ective action On the D3-branes worldvolume, we get the quartic potential given by a perfect square apple S T = tr hh (+)D3 H ( )D3 i + 4 hhd3 0 H D3 0 i = 6 tr [D ad a ], where the auxiliary field D a = µ a T µ, contains through its EOM the 3 ADHM constraints (on the D( ) slot). apple a µ T µ =0! a µ [a µ, a ]! ( µ )! =0

Yang-Mills Instantons transverse auxiliary fields The auxiliary fields in the transverse directions are less interesting and have more complicated structure: 0 H (+)T B = @ [ m, n] mn +[A, m] m ( m!! m) m S (, ) C A 0i, ( m!! m) m S (, ) [ m, n] mn +[a, m] m H ( )T = H (+)T (m! m,! ), H T 0 = [ m, m] 0 0i, 0 [ m, m]

Yang-Mills Instantons e ective action The complete e ective action is apple S (4) e ( A) = tr hh (+) H ( ) i + 4 hh 0 H 0 i = and plugging all the auxiliary fields, the action is given by h = 8 tr [A µ, A ] +[a µ, a ] +[ p, q] +[ p, q] i apple 4 tr [A µ, p] +[a µ, p] + 4 (! µ!) + 4 (! µ!) 4 tr [[A µ µ, A ]!! [a µ, a ]! µ! ] + h i h i tr!!!! tr p! p!. The full e ective action is correctly reproduced (see Lerda, Frau, Billo, Pesando and Liccardo 00).

Yang-Mills Instantons e ective action The complete e ective action is apple S (4) e ( A) = tr hh (+) H ( ) i + 4 hh 0 H 0 i = and plugging all the auxiliary fields, the action is given by h = 8 tr [A µ, A ] +[a µ, a ] +[ p, q] +[ p, q] i apple 4 tr [A µ, p] +[a µ, p] + 4 (! µ!) + 4 (! µ!) 4 tr [[A µ µ, A ]!! [a µ, a ]! µ! ] + h i h i tr!!!! tr p! p!. The full e ective action is correctly reproduced (see Lerda, Frau, Billo, Pesando and Liccardo 00).

Higher Orders - Some comments on the future directions While the quintic order is trivially zero(by c ghost counting for example), the sixth order is definitely more challenging for several reasons: The number of involved terms considerably grows. The contact term is identically zero (c-ghost counting) and there is a clear hierarchy of propagator terms but it is not likewise evident how to proceed e ciently. The combinatorial nature of the vertices gets complicated due to presence of, or 3 propagators and 0 in the amplitudes.

Higher Orders - Some comments on the future directions However from brute force computation one can observe that at any order g n in the expansion = g A + P m= g m R m we have schematically that n Tr [R m (EOM(R n m ))], < m apple n and then it is zero since we solve the equations of motion perturbatively. For m = n we remain with only the kinetic term of R n : h i Tr ( 0 R n )(Q B R n ) This fact reduces a lot the number of involved terms. We think this is a good starting point and we hope to report on these progress soon.

Thank you for your Attention!