Self-Heating Behaviour of Heat-Affected Coal

Similar documents
Contrast in Self-Heating Rate Behaviour for Coals of Similar Rank

Spontaneous Combustion Management - Linking Experiment With Reality

Contrasts in methane sorption properties between New Zealand and Australian coals

Understanding the Causes of Roof Control Problems on A Longwall Face from Shield Monitoring Data - a Case Study

Innovative Techniques for Detection and Control of Underground Spontaneous Combustion of Coal

Geotechnical modelling based on geophysical logging data

Influence of Temperature on the Gas Content of Coal and Sorption Modelling

Experimental and numerical investigation of injection of coal washery waste into longwall goaf

How NSW and Queensland Coalfields Differ - What We Need To Do Better

Water Inflow Issues above Longwall Panels

Successful Use of a Stress Relief Roadway at Appin Colliery

Strong Weighting Events in Shallow Multi-seam Longwall Mining

Methods of Interpreting Ground Stress Based on Underground Stress Measurements and Numerical Modelling

Sorption Characteristic of Coal, Particle Size, Gas Type and Time

Exploration for Results: Moura Coal Mine

Geotechnical roof classification for an underground coal mine from borehole data

Mechanics of Rib Deformation at Moranbah North Mine - A Case Study

Gas Desorption Rate of Coal Seams in Zonguldak Coal Basic as an Indicator of Outburst Proneness

For personal use only

C H A P T E R 3 FUELS AND COMBUSTION

Wongai Project Presentation

Cross-measure directional drilling

Optimum Size of Coal Pillar Dimensions Serving Mechanised Caving Longwall Face in a Thick Seam

A summary of the review s findings for the six areas, listed in Table 1, is given below.

History of Outbursts in Australia and Current Management Controls

The use of seismic methods for the detection of dykes

Mine Subsidence Predictions Using a Mechanistic Modelling Approach

Annual Report Amended Additional Information

Study of seismic activities associated with Australian underground coal mining

LOCHINVAR COKING COAL PROJECT. LOI-001 Raw Coal Analysis ASX RELEASE. 18 February 2013 ASX RELEASE. 11 April 2013

Successful Construction of a Complex 3D Excavation Using 2D and 3D Modelling

Influence of temperature on coal sorption characteristics and the theory of coal surface free energy

JV PROJECT UPDATE JORC COAL RESOURCE

Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane through Wire Line Logs Jharia field: A Case Study

Getting Useful Gas and Stress Measurements Out of Exploration Drilling

Geotechnical Assessment of Polymeric Materials as Skin Reinforcement in Underground Mines

Impacts of Longwall Mining to Rivers and Cliffs in the Southern Coalfield

I13/3168/2008 SGL 413

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BANGLADESH BARAPUKURIA COAL WITH THOSE OF VARIOUS OTHER COUNTRIES

8.1Mt Maiden JORC Coal Resource estimate at Titiribi Project

For personal use only

Classification of Coal Seams for Coal and Gas Outburst Proneness in the Zonguldak Coal Basın, Turkey

Investigation of the relationship between strata characteristics and longwall caving behaviour

For personal use only

Hard Coal Reserves and Resources in Poland and Relationship to UNFC-2009

Deformability Modulus of Jointed Rocks, Limitation of Empirical Methods and Introducing a New Analytical Approach

Investigations of Hard (difficult) to drain Seam

Geotechnical Evaluation of Roof Conditions at Crinum Mine Based on Geophysical Log Interpretation

Geotechnical Considerations for Longwall Top Coal Caving at Austar Coal Mine

For personal use only

North Goonyella Outburst Incident Learnings

NCONDEZI COAL COMPANY LTD ("Ncondezi" or the "Company") Ncondezi Project South Block Resource Update

For personal use only

For personal use only

Lanthanides in coal combustion fly ash

The Impacts of Mine Subsidence on Creeks, River Valleys and Gorges Due to Underground Coal Mining Operations

Monitoring longwall weighting at Austar Mine using microseismic systems and stressmeters

SESE MEASURED RESOURCE EXCEEDS 650MT COAL

Effects of shearing direction on shear behaviour of rock joints

For personal use only

MAIDEN JORC RESOURCE CONFIRMS SIGNIFICANT COAL DEPOSIT AT MARIOLA COAL PROJECT, POLAND

Combustion. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

Geotechnical data from geophysical logs: stress, strength and joint patters in NSW and QLD coalfields

3D Modeling of the Santa Terezinha Coalfield, Brazil - implications for estimation of the CBM potential

Numerical modelling for estimation of first weighting distance in longwall coal mining - A case study

For personal use only

Chapter Three: Coalbed Gas in the Cherokee Basin

Assessment of seismic events in German hard coal mining - occurrence and prediction

COKAL ANNOUNCES POSITIVE RESULTS FROM SCOPING STUDY OF UNDERGROUND MINING AT BBM COAL PROJECT INDONESIA

Metropolitan Low-Level Outburst Incident Learnings and Improvements

Control and Management of Outburst in Australian Underground Coal Mines

CROWSNEST COALFIELD. Mapping along Morrissey Ridge was rnmpleted and the key area of Morrissey Creek was examined in

COKAL CONFIRMS PREMIUM QUALITY METALLURGICAL COAL AT BUMI BARITO MINERAL PROJECT (BBM)

Case Study Central Colliery QLD

Estimation of rock cavability in jointed roof in longwall mining

For personal use only

Ovoot Coking Coal Project (100%)

CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF OUTBURST IN AUSTRALIAN UNDERGROUND COAL MINES

Inseam Boreholes to and Beyond 2000 m with a Combination of Slide and Rotary Drilling

BENEFICIATION OF LOW GRADE LIGNITE OF BARMER RAJASTHAN (INDIA)

WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. Mining, Geology and Energy Consultants

IVANHOE COMMENCES RESOURCE DELINEATION DRILLING AT NARIIN SUKHAIT COAL PROJECT IN MONGOLIA S SOUTH GOBI

VISTA COAL PROJECT RESOURCE INCREASES BY 297.1MT TOTAL COAL RESOURCE INCREASES TO 1.37BT

Ukrainian State Research Institute for Carbochemistry (UKHIN), 61023, Kharkiv, 7 Vesnina Str., Ukraine

Quantitative landslide hazard assessment in an urban area

Effect of Grouting on Longwall Mining Through Faults

Susceptibility of coal to spontaneous combustion verified by modified adiabatic method under conditions of Ostrava-Karvina Coalfield, Czech Republic

Hume coal An overview

Acquisition agreement to move to 100% ownership of the Ashford Coking Coal Project

ANALYSIS OF FIELD TEST RESULTS FOR THE OIL SHALE MINE VENTILATION SIMULATION

Advanced numerical modelling methods of rock bolt performance in underground mines

Coalburst Control Methods

KATINGAN RIA COAL RESOURCE UPGRADE

FORTUNE MINERALS LIMITED

Lecture 3 Rocks and the Rock Cycle Dr. Shwan Omar

Table 1 - Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria (The JORC Code, 2012 Edition)

A STUDY OF COAL FORMATION

Windy Knob Resources Limited (ABN ) Developing World Class Coal Deposits

Experimental Investigations of Combustion Behaviour in Various O 2 /CO 2 -Atmospheres

Compaction of coal wash as reclamation fill

Transcription:

University of Wollongong Research Online Coal Operators' Conference Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2016 Self-Heating Behaviour of Heat-Affected Coal Basil Beamish CB3 Mine Services Pty Ltd Mark Cosgrove Centennial Coal Company Limited Jan Theiler CB3 Mine Services Pty Ltd Publication Details Basil Beamish, Mark Cosgrove and Jan Theiler, Self-Heating Behaviour of Heat-Affected Coal, in Naj Aziz and Bob Kininmonth (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Coal Operators' Conference, Mining Engineering, University of Wollongong, 10-12 February 2016, 451-455. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: research-pubs@uow.edu.au

SELF-HEATING BEHAVIOUR OF HEAT-AFFECTED COAL Basil Beamish 1, Mark Cosgrove 2 and Jan Theiler 1 ABSTRACT: Adiabatic oven testing of heat-affected and normal coal from the same location at Mandalong Mine shows substantial differences in intrinsic self-heating rates and self-heating behaviour. While initial self-heating rates of the heat-affected coal are greater than normal coal under site conditions, there is no sustained self-heating to thermal runaway due to a decrease in the number of reactive sites remaining in the heat-affected coal and greater inaccessibility to those sites that do exist. This behaviour is attributable to the vesicular nature of the heat-affected coal contributing to easy access to open pores resulting in the initial burst of self-heating. However, the thermal alteration of the coal also contributes to destruction of reactive sites and makes access to the remaining reactive sites in the micropore system of the coal more difficult. INTRODUCTION Adiabatic oven testing has been used routinely by Australian and New Zealand coal mine operations since the early 1980 s to rate the propensity of coal to spontaneously combust (Humphreys et al., 1981). Many different features of coal have been studied using this technique to establish their affect on self-heating rates. These include: changes in coal rank (Beamish and Arisoy 2008 and Beamish and Beamish 2012); coal type (Beamish and Clarkson 2006); and mineral matter composition (Beamish and Blazak 2005 and Beamish and Sainsbury 2008). As coal rank increases due to the natural coalification process the coal changes both chemically and physically and this results in a decrease in the intrinsic self-heating rate of the coal. Some seams can come into contact with or are adjacent to igneous intrusions, and under these circumstances the coal is artificially rank advanced through the devolatilisation that takes place in response to the exceedingly high temperatures experienced by the coal (Ward et al., 1989; Kwiecinska and Petersen 2004 and Singh et al., 2007). This results in what is commonly referred to as heat-affected or coked coal. The self-heating behaviour of such coal is not reported in the literature and this paper presents the results of recent self-heating tests of both heat-affected and normal coal from the same location of the Mandalong Mine in New South Wales. COAL SAMPLES AND ADIABATIC TESTING Within the general vicinity of Main gate19 at Mandalong Mine a localised igneous sill has penetrated the upper part of the seam and reaches a thickness of roughly 80 cm. Approximately 1.5 m of heat-affected coal overlies the sill. This coal will be caving into the goaf as the longwall panel extracts the coal from below the sill. It is therefore important to establish the spontaneous combustion propensity of the heat-affected coal in comparison with the normal coal from the same area to ensure appropriate management practices are in place. In addition, due to the expected rank increase of the heat-affected coal due to thermal alteration, a high rank bituminous coal from the Goonyella Lower Seam is used in this paper to compare the self-heating behaviour. The coal quality details of the samples are contained in Table 1. The normal Mandalong coal is high volatile A bituminous in rank and the heat-affected coal has decreased in volatile matter from 35.9% to 5.1%, which creates an artificial rank elevation equivalent to anthracite. The heat-affected coal also shows an increase in ash content due partially to concentration of the existing mineral matter as the coal 1 CB3 Mine Services Pty Ltd, PO Box 1089, Mt Ommaney QLD 4074, E-mail: basil@b3miningservices.com, 2 Centennial Coal Company Limited, Mandalong Mine, 12 Kerry Anderson Drive, Mandalong NSW 2264, 10 12 February 2016 451

devolatilised and injection of extraneous mineral matter from the intrusive fluids accompanying the sill emplacement. Samples of both normal and heat-affected coal from MG19 have been tested using an adiabatic oven to establish their R70 values and to benchmark the time taken to reach thermal runaway (incubation period) under conditions more closely resembling those of the mine site. The R70 testing procedure is described by Beamish (2005) and essentially involves testing a dried, crushed coal sample under adiabatic conditions from a fixed starting temperature of 40 C. The incubation test procedure, known as SponComSIM testing, uses the coal in its as-mined moisture state from a starting temperature that reflects the site-specific conditions. The results obtained provide both an indication of the time taken to reach thermal runaway and the characteristic behaviour of the coal as self-heating progresses. This can be compared against case history coals of known self-heating behaviour as well as mine site experience. Table 1: Coal quality data for coal samples from MG19, Mandalong Mine and high rank Goonyella Lower Seam PROXIMATE ANALYSIS (air-dried basis) Normal Coal Mandalong Heat-affected Coal Goonyella Lower Seam Moisture (%) 2.2 2.5 1.2 Ash (%) 18.5 28.2 21.9 Volatile Matter (%) 29.5 5.7 17.2 Fixed Carbon (%) 49.8 63.6 59.7 ULTIMATE ANALYSIS (dry ash-free basis) Carbon (%) 82.3 91.2 86.9 Hydrogen (%) 4.98 2.17 5.00 Nitrogen (%) 1.68 1.75 1.78 Sulphur (%) 0.38 0.19 0.56 Oxygen (%) 10.7 4.7 5.8 COAL RANK PARAMETERS Volatile Matter (%, dry mineral matter free) Calorific Value (Btu/lb, moist mineral matter free) 35.9 5.1 20.4 14061 na na ASTM rank hvab an lvb na not applicable; hvab high volatile A bituminous; lvb low volatile bituminous; an anthracite Samples of both normal and heat-affected coal from MG19 have been tested using an adiabatic oven to establish their R70 values and to benchmark the time taken to reach thermal runaway (incubation period) under conditions more closely resembling those of the mine site. The R70 testing procedure is described by Beamish (2005) and essentially involves testing a dried, crushed coal sample under adiabatic conditions from a fixed starting temperature of 40 C. The incubation test procedure, known as SponComSIM testing, uses the coal in its as-mined moisture state from a starting temperature that reflects the site-specific conditions. The results obtained provide both an indication of the time taken to 452 10 12 February 2016

Temperature ( o C) 2016 Coal Operators Conference The University of Wollongong reach thermal runaway and the characteristic behaviour of the coal as self-heating progresses. This can be compared against case history coals of known self-heating behaviour as well as mine site experience. ADIABATIC TESTING RESULTS AND DISCUSSION R70 values and intrinsic self-heating rate behaviour The R70 self-heating rate curves for the normal and heat-affected coal samples from MG19 are shown in Figure 1. The normal coal has an R70 value of 2.12 C/h, which rates the coal as having a medium intrinsic spontaneous combustion propensity (Beamish and Beamish 2012). However, the heat-affected coal initially self-heated before the temperature levelled out at 62 C and did not reach the standard 70 C that is used to define the R70 value of the coal. Therefore, the R70 value of the heat-affected coal is recorded as 0. Figure 1 also contains the self-heating curve for a high rank bituminous coal sample from the Goonyella Lower Seam. It can clearly be seen that the heat-affected coal has an initial self-heating rate that is faster than the Goonyella Lower Seam sample, but the two self-heating curves cross over after about 40 hours on test. Subsequently, the Goonyella Lower Seam sample proceeds to thermal runaway, whereas the heat-affected coal sample stalls. This is presumably related to a combination of both physical and chemical difference between the two coal samples. Heat-affected coals contain vesicles in the form of pits and cavities of variable sizes due to the escape of volatiles (Singh et al., 2007). This enables easy access of oxygen to available reactive sites initially. However, a majority of the original reactive sites are destroyed due to the thermal alteration process from the igneous intrusion and the remaining reactive sites are contained in the much finer micropore system of the heat-affected coal, which has undergone significant annealing thus reducing the accessibility to these remaining reactive sites. The heat-affected sample was step-heated to just over 100 C to compare against the exponential self-heating rate of the Goonyella Lower Seam sample from this same temperature. The results are shown in Figure 2. Even at elevated temperatures the self-heating rate of the heat-affected coal is quite slow and there is no major rise in the self-heating rate until the coal temperature exceeds approximately 150 C. 160 140 120 100 80 60 R 70 = 2.12 o C/h R 70 = 0.41 o C/h R 70 = 0.00 o C/h 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (hours) MG19 Normal Coal MG19 Heat-affected Coal Goonyella Lower Seam Figure 1: Adiabatic R 70 self-heating curves for normal and heat-affected coal from MG19, Mandalong Mine compared against high rank bituminous coal from the Goonyella Lower Seam 10 12 February 2016 453

Figure 2: Comparison between self-heating rates of heat-affected coal from MG19 and Goonyella Lower Seam coal at elevated temperatures Incubation testing and self-heating behaviour The SponComSIM test results for the heat-affected and normal coal from MG19 are shown in Figure 3. The initial self-heating rate of the heat-affected coal is greater than the normal coal, which again can be attributed to the open pore structure (vesicular nature) of the heat-affected coal. However, after reaching a maximum temperature of approximately 38 C, the temperature of the heat-affected coal gradually decreases due to the overriding influence of moisture evaporation combined with hindered access and a decrease in the number of reactive sites. It is clear from these results and the results of the R70 self-heating rate testing that the heat-affected coal is not capable of reaching thermal runaway, unless it is exposed to a significant external heat source. Even then, it would take a considerably long time for the coal to reach thermal runaway. If the normal coal was present in a loose pile of critical thickness with sufficient continuous air supply and minimal heat dissipation, then spontaneous combustion incubation would be possible to elevated temperatures. However, this is strongly mitigated by the goaf inertisation practice in use at Mandalong, which utilises methane from the in-seam gas drainage system to inert the goaf atmosphere (Claassen 2011). CONCLUSIONS The results of adiabatic self-heating tests from normal and heat-affected coal, once again show that coal self-heating performance is not a simple predictable behaviour. Under ideal site conditions, the heat-affected coal is capable of initially self-heating above ambient temperatures, but due to the combined effects of moisture evaporation as well as limited access and the decrease in the number of reactive sites, sustained self-heating is not possible without the presence of a significant external heat source. The physical and chemical changes to the coal created by thermal alteration from an igneous sill have contributed to the self-heating behaviour observed. From a risk management perspective the caving of this coal into the goaf does not therefore create any additional risk of creating a spontaneous combustion event. 454 10 12 February 2016

Figure 3: Adiabatic SponComSIM self-heating curves for normal and heat-affected coal from MG19, Mandalong Mine ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Centennial Coal Mandalong Mine for granting permission to publish these results. REFERENCES Beamish, B B, 2005. Comparison of the R 70 self-heating rate of New Zealand and Australian coals to Suggate rank parameter, International Journal of Coal Geology, 64(1-2):139-144. Beamish, B B and Arisoy, A, 2008. Effect of intrinsic coal properties on self-heating rates, in Proceedings 12 th US/North American Mine Ventilation Symposium (ed: K G Wallace Jr), pp 149-153 (The Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc., Littleton, USA). Beamish, B and Beamish, R, 2012. Testing and sampling requirements for input to spontaneous combustion risk assessment, in Proceedings of the Australian Mine Ventilation Conference (eds: B Beamish and D Chalmers), pp 15-21 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne). Beamish, B B and Blazak, D G, 2005. Relationship between ash content and R 70 self-heating rate of Callide coal, International Journal of Coal Geology, 64(1-2):126-132. Beamish, B and Clarkson, F, 2006. Self-heating rates of Sydney Basin coals The emerging picture, in Proceedings of the 36 th Sydney Basin Symposium, pp 1-8 (University of Wollongong). Beamish, B B and Sainsbury, W, 2008. Development of a site specific self-heating rate prediction equation for a high volatile bituminous coal, in Proceedings 8 th Coal Operator s Conference (ed: N Aziz), pp 161-165, (University of Wollongong and The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy). Claassen, C, 2011. Goaf inertisation and sealing utilising methane from in-seam gas drainage system, in Proceedings 11 th Coal Operator s Conference, pp 369-374, (University of Wollongong and The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy). Humphreys, D, Rowlands, D and Cudmore, J F, 1981. Spontaneous combustion of some Queensland coals, in Proceedings of Ignitions, Explosions and Fires in Coal Mines Symposium, pp 5-1 - 5-19 (The AusIMM Illawarra Branch). Kwiecinska, B and Petersen, H I, 2004. Graphite, semi-graphite, natural coke, and natural char classification-iccp system, International Journal of Coal Geology, 57:99-116. Singh, A K, Singh, M P, Sharma, M and Srivastava S K, 2007. Microstructures and microtextures of natural cokes: A case study of heat-affected coking coals from the Jharia coalfield, India, International Journal of Coal Geology, 71:153-175. Ward, C R, Warbrooke, P R and Roberts, F J, 1989. Geochemical and mineralogical changes in a coal seam due to contact metamorphism, International Journal of Coal Geology, 11:105-125. 10 12 February 2016 455