Construction and Use of API Single- Quadrupole MS Spectral Libraries.

Similar documents
Hypericin Analysis by LC/MS

Accurate Mass Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Waters

Making Sense of Differences in LCMS Data: Integrated Tools

Multi-residue analysis of pesticides by GC-HRMS

MassHunter TOF/QTOF Users Meeting

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 37. Chem 4631

Accurate Mass Measurement for Intact Proteins using ESI-oa-TOF. Application Note. Donghui Yi and Christine Miller Agilent Technologies

Mass Spectrometry. Hyphenated Techniques GC-MS LC-MS and MS-MS

Agilent 6400 Series Triple Quadrupole Users Workshop. MH QQQ Users workshop 2/21/2014 1

Agilent ESI and APCI sources: for polar to non-polar compounds

Agilent 1290 Infinity Quaternary LC Stepwise Transfer to Methods with MS-Compatible Mobile Phases

LC-MS Based Metabolomics

The Analysis of Organophosphate Pesticides by LC/MS Application

WADA Technical Document TD2003IDCR

All Ions MS/MS: Targeted Screening and Quantitation Using Agilent TOF and Q-TOF LC/MS Systems

Selecting an LC/MS Interface Becky Wittrig, Ph.D.

Overview. Introduction. André Schreiber AB SCIEX Concord, Ontario (Canada)

Electrospray Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Introduction

Agilent 6400 Series Triple Quadrupole LC/MS/MS Users Session

Bioanalytical Chem: 4590: LC-MSMS of analgesics LC-MS Experiment Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS)

Analytical determination of testosterone in human serum using an Agilent Ultivo Triple Quadrupole LC/MS

Finnigan LCQ Advantage MAX

Simplified Approaches to Impurity Identification using Accurate Mass UPLC/MS

Dissociation of Even-Electron Ions

An Effective Workflow for Impurity Analysis Incorporating High Quality HRAM LCMS & MSMS with Intelligent Automated Data Mining

Determination of EU-Banned Disperse Dyes by LC/MSD TOF Application

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION. Michael O Leary, Jennifer Gough, Tanya Tollifson Waters Corporation, Milford, MA USA

Rapid Screening and Confirmation of Melamine Residues in Milk and Its Products by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Accurate Mass Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Waters: Identification of Polyethylene Glycol Surfactants by LC/Q-TOF-MS

Determination of Pharmaceuticals in Water by SPE and LC/MS/MS in Both Positive and Negative Ion Modes Application

Yun W. Alelyunas, Mark D. Wrona, Russell J. Mortishire-Smith, Nick Tomczyk, and Paul D. Rainville Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA INTRODUCTION

Macrolides in Honey Using Agilent Bond Elut Plexa SPE, Poroshell 120, and LC/MS/MS

Analysis of Stachydrine in Leonurus japonicus Using an Agilent ZORBAX RRHD HILIC Plus Column with LC/ELSD and LC/MS/MS

Application Note. Edgar Naegele. Abstract

SEAMLESS INTEGRATION OF MASS DETECTION INTO THE UV CHROMATOGRAPHIC WORKFLOW

Highly Sensitive and Rugged GC/MS/MS Tool

Analyzing Compounds of Environmental Interest Using an LC/Q-TOF Part 1: Dyes and Pigments. Application. Introduction. Authors. Abstract.

De Novo Metabolite Chemical Structure Determination. Paul R. West Ph.D. Stemina Biomarker Discovery, Inc.

LC/MS/MS qua ntitation of β-estradiol 17-acetate using an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS working in ESI negative ion mode

Agilent All Ions MS/MS

Using TOF for Screening and Quantitation of Sudan Red Colorants in Food Application

Analytical Technologies and Compound Identification. Daniel L. Norwood, MSPH, PhD SCĪO Analytical Consulting, LLC.

Guide to Peptide Quantitation. Agilent clinical research

Fast and Reliable Method for the Analysis of Methylmalonic Acid from Human Plasma

Cerno Bioscience MassWorks: Acquiring Calibration Data on Agilent GC/MSDs

The Use of the ACQUITY QDa Detector for a Selective, Sensitive, and Robust Quantitative Method for a Potential Genotoxic Impurity

Live Webinar : How to be more Successful with your ACQUITY QDa Detector?

Analysis of a Verapamil Microsomal Incubation using Metabolite ID and Mass Frontier TM

MS n Analysis With Fast Polarity Switching in the Agilent 1100 Series LC/MSD Trap SL. Application Note. Christine Miller Agilent Technologies

Impurities Sources, Detection and Measurement HPLC-MS Analyses. Dr Courtney Milner Chemical Analysis

Improved Screening for 250 Pesticides in Matrix using a LC-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer

Automated and accurate component detection using reference mass spectra

Sensitive and Repeatable Analysis of Pesticides in QuEChERS Extracts with APGC-MS/MS

Determination of Beta-Blockers in Urine Using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Agilent TOF Screening & Impurity Profiling Julie Cichelli, PhD LC/MS Small Molecule Workshop Dec 6, 2012

Technical Note. Introduction

Utility of H-SRM to Reduce Matrix Interference in Food Residue Analysis of Pesticides by LC-MS/MS Using the TSQ Quantum Discovery

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis Methylone, Primary Standard

Training Courses. Chromatography training from the Crawford Scientific experts

ACD/Labs Software Impurity Resolution Management. Presented by Peter Russell

LC and LC/MS Column Selection Flow Chart

Quantitative analysis of mitragynine in human urine by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

TANDEM MASS SPECTROSCOPY

Abstract. Experimental Sample Preparation

Application Note. David A. Weil Zoltan Timar Michael Zumwalt Edgar Naegele. Abstract

Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS System with an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC For Multi-Plant Growth Regulator Analysis in Grapes

Introduction of Hitachi Chromaster 5610 MS Detector for High Performance Liquid Chromatograph

Confirmation of In Vitro Nefazodone Metabolites using the Superior Fragmentation of the QTRAP 5500 LC/MS/MS System

Cerno Application Note Extending the Limits of Mass Spectrometry

Developing a fast, generic method for rapid resolution LC with quadrupole MS detection. Application Note

Separation of Explosives in EPA 8330: Column Choices Optimize Speed, Resolution, and Solvent Use. Application. Authors. Abstract.

Die Nadel im Heuhaufen

Quantitative Analysis and Identification of Migrants in Food Packaging Using LC-MS/MS

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Pharmaceutical QA/QC. Siji Joseph Agilent Technologies, Inc. Bangalore, India

Workflow Using Hyphenated Mass Spectrometry Techniques

Tomorrow s quantitation with the TSQ Fortis mass spectrometer: quantitation of phenylephrine hydrochloride for QA/QC laboratories

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Shodex TM ODP2 HP series columns

Maximizing Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry Productivity with the Agilent StreamSelect LC/MS System

The new Water Screening PCDL

Webinar: How to be More Successful with your ACQUITY QDa Detector Eric van Beelen

Identification and Characterization of an Isolated Impurity Fraction: Analysis of an Unknown Degradant Found in Quetiapine Fumarate

Validated HPLC Methods

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY. Pre-Lab Questions

Metabolomics Batch Data Analysis Workflow to Characterize Differential Metabolites in Bacteria

AB SCIEX SelexION Technology Used to Improve Mass Spectral Library Searching Scores by Removal of Isobaric Interferences

QTOF Training Manual

770-9P. Sensitivity and Selectivity - A Case Study of LC/MS Enantioselective Resolution of Bupivacaine Using Vancomycin as a Chiral Stationary Phase

Application Note LCMS-112 A Fully Automated Two-Step Procedure for Quality Control of Synthetic Peptides

Simultaneous analysis for forensic drugs in human blood and urine using ultra-high speed LC-MS/MS

High-Resolution Sampling 2D-LC for Pharmaceutical Impurity Analysis

MassHunter METLIN Metabolite PCD/PCDL Quick Start Guide

Computer-assisted analysis of complex natural product extracts

The 5975 inert MSD Benefits of Enhancements in Chemical Ionization Operation Technical Note

M M e M M H M M H. Ion Sources

High Sensitivity HPLC Analysis of Perchlorate in Tap Water Using an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS System

Acknowledgement: 4F-PBP (C14H18FNO) T: +386 (0) E: Vodovodna Ljubljana SLOVENIJA

Ultrafast Analysis of Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine in Urine Using the Agilent RapidFire High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry System

New Approaches to the Development of GC/MS Selected Ion Monitoring Acquisition and Quantitation Methods Technique/Technology

Transcription:

Paul Zavitsanos Product Marketing Manager September 11, 2003 Construction and Use of API Single- Quadrupole MS Spectral Libraries. Time: 11:00 a.m. EDT Telephone Number: 888-840-7687 International Number: 703-871-3885 Chairperson: Rita Willis

Acknowledgements and Partners Dr. Robert Voyksner and Ms. Jennifer Townsend LC/MS Limited Mme Isabelle Vecchioli CARSO France AccuStandard Inc. Dr. Stuart Huckin Riverview Hospital, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada Mme. Isabelle Chanel, M. Jean Paul Chauve, Mr. Monty Benefiel, Dr. Jerry Zweigenbaum, Dr. Chin-Kai Meng. Agilent Technologies Worldwide Slide 4

I graduated from Concordia University in 1979 with a B.Sc. Specialization in Chemistry. In the past twenty-five years, I have worked for the chemical industry in positions from bench technician to senior method development scientist to bioanalytical lab director in both the USA and Canada. In the instrument industry, I have served as a technical salesperson for both Waters and for HP/Agilent, as well as a technical specialist for HPLC and LC/MS/MS for HP/Agilent. I have extensive hands-on and training expertise in HPLC, GC, GC/MS, LC/MS, and LC/MS/MS with both trap and linear quadrupole instruments. Presently, I am working at Agilent s Little Falls Site in Wilmington, Delaware and am responsible for the development and implementation of LC/MS and LC/MS/MS marketing strategies in the Chemical Analysis markets. Slide 5

Introduction Reliable API libraries are possible and useful but there are distinct performance differences when compared to traditional EI GC/MS libraries. API is not as universal an ionization mode as is EI. Ionization efficiency, and as a consequence, are variable even within a compound class. API with up-front Collision Induced Dissociation has more variable ion ratios does than EI. API and EI are COMPLIMENTARY Techniques EI generally trades-off the presence of a molecular ion for a complex spectrum that is highly specific to the compound. API supplies excellent molecular ion information but has limited fragment information and hence less specificity in the spectrum. The CID fragmentation process is instrument dependent and not as reproducible as fragmentation that is a consequence of EI. Large universal libraries are more likely with EI. API at the present time lends itself more to smaller dedicated targeted libraries specific to narrow applications and most likely associated with specific chromatographic mobile phase chemistries. Slide 6

Introduction cont d Agilent, in conjunction with our partners in the API Libraries Project, has established a set of procedures that makes the best (to date) of the limitations inherent to API and CID with respect to API libraries. By following these procedures, any Agilent 1100 LC/MSD SL can produce API libraries that will give good results on searches for unknowns. At this point the best results are with small libraries (ca. 1000 compounds). Our experience indicates that CID libraries based on ESI can be dependent on the Mobile Phase system, specifically the buffers and modifiers employed, because the formation of specific adducts is often mobile phase related. At this time, we suggest that ESI libraries be kept specific to a given mobile phase. We will detail the use and development of a POSITIVE ION ESI/AMMONIUM ACETATE-ACETONITRILE MOBILE PHASE library for PESTICIDES in the last half of this presentation. The NIST PESTICIDES database can be downloaded from the Agilent CAS web-site free of charge. Updates will occur about every 6 weeks. We at Agilent sincerely hope that these efforts will provide some assistance to many of your questions about MS spectral library construction in API. Slide 7

PRINCIPLES Slide 8

Guiding Principles in the Agilent Approach to API Single Quadrupole MS Spectral Libraries Multiple Collisional Energy Approach The Agilent approach in the construction of single quadrupole API MS spectral libraries is based on the fact that the MS spectra change as a function of increasing collision energy. The following slides illustrate this first principle. At low energy the protonated molecular ion and other adduct ions (first order ions) are typically the dominant ions in the spectrum. At higher ion energies fragmentation of the protonated molecular ion and other adducts occurs, adding the product ions (second order ions) to the spectrum. The product ions themselves can also be fragmented(third and higher order ions). Eventually, at a sufficiently high voltage, the spectrum is typically populated by simple ions. The Agilent approach holds that an API single quadrupole MS spectral library should not be based solely on a single spectrum but on a group of spectra that define the progression of the spectrum from low to high energy. The Agilent approach holds that there is definitive information in these spectral changes. The approach uses four (4) different ion energies defined by the fragmentor voltage spaced through a minimum and maximum setting for the compounds expected in the library. These four ion energies define the four fragmentation endpoints. A complete library is defined by four individual libraries, one for each endpoint. Slide 9

Guiding Principles in the Agilent Approach to API Single Quadrupole MS Spectral Libraries 2 Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tune API spectra were believed to be inconsistent between the instruments of different suppliers and even between different units of the same model. With traditional tuning procedures, spectra taken at the same settings on different instruments produced different spectra. Performance (Fragmentation) based tuning can normalize the variability between units of the same instrument model and possibly between different models. It is not known if it can normalize the differences in instruments from different manufacturers. Performance (fragmentation) based tuning holds that one does not rely on a voltage value to set the ion energy. Instead performance based tune relies on tuning to a fixed performance variable, fragmentation in this case, using predefined chemical compounds. The library is acquired at four fragmentation endpoints. The chemical standards have well defined spectra at these endpoints and specific ion ratios are defined for each fragmentation endpoint. The Agilent approach involves the use of one compound per fragmentation endpoint. When a quadrupole is tuned to give the ideal ion ratios at each endpoint, the resultant spectra will match the library. As tuning is based on specific ion ratios the actual fragmentation voltages for each endpoint may be different than those used to acquire the library. Slide 10

ION BREAKDOWN PROFILES Slide 11

Ion Breakdown Profile The following slides show the change in the appearance of the spectrum from low energy to higher energies. As one moves from left to right along the X-axis, the ion breakdown profile shows the ions that will begin to appear and fragmentation voltage at which they begin to appear. Ideally, at the very left only the protonated molecular ion is expected (ION 1). As more energy is applied to this ion by an increase in the fragmentation voltage, the parent ion breaks down into product ions (ION 3 and ION 2). These product ions are specific fragments of the parent ion. As even more energy is applied to the ions, some product ion species will themselves be fragmented. As a consequence some product ions are apparent only over a narrow range of fragmentation voltages (ION 3). At the highest voltages available on the instrument, the ions produced are typically simple, low m/z ions that offer little qualitative information. Slide 12

Ion Breakdown Profile 100 NORMALIZED ION INTENSITY 80 60 40 20 ION 1 ION 2 + ION 3 ION 1 ION 2 ION 3 0 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE (volts) Slide 13

120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Mass Spectrum at 45 Volts Fragmentation Voltage MASS SPECTRUM AT 45 VOLTS FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE ION 1 45 VOLTS 10 22 34 46 58 70 82 94 106 118 130 141 150 162 174 186 198 210 222 234 246 258 270 281 290 302 314 326 338 350 362 374 383 394 m/z Slide 14 NORMALIZED ION ABUNDANCE

Ion Breakdown Profile 100 NORMALIZED ION INTENSITY 80 60 40 20 ION 1 ION 2 ION 3 0 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE (volts) Slide 15

Mass Spectrum at 90 Volts Fragmentation Voltage MASS SPECTRUM AT 90 VOLTS FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE 120 100 ION 1 NORMALIZED ION ABUNDANCE 80 60 40 ION 3 90 VOLTS 20 ION 2 0 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 m/z Slide 16

Ion Breakdown Profile 100 NORMALIZED ION INTENSITY 80 60 40 20 ION 1 ION 2 ION 3 0 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE (volts) Slide 17

Mass Spectrum at 130 Volts Fragmentation Voltage MASS SPECTRUM AT 130 VOLTS FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE 120 100 ION 3 NORMALIZED ION ABUNDANC 80 60 40 ION 2 ION 1 130 VOLTS 20 0 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 m/z Slide 18

Ion Breakdown Profile 100 NORMALIZED ION INTENSITY 80 60 40 20 ION 1 ION 2 ION 3 0 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE (volts) Slide 19

Mass Spectrum at 170 Volts Fragmentation Voltage MASS SPECTRUM AT 170 VOLT FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE 120 100 ION 2 NORMALIZED ION ABUNDANCE 80 60 40 ION 3 170 VOLTS 20 ION 1 0 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 m/z Slide 20

Ion Breakdown Profile 100 NORMALIZED ION INTENSITY 80 60 40 20 ION 1 ION 2 ION 3 0 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE (volts) Slide 21

Mass Spectrum at 220 Volts Fragmentation Voltage MASS SPECTRUM AT 220 VOLTS FRAGMENTATION VOLTAGE 120 100 ION 2 NORMALIZED ION ABUNDANCE 80 60 40 220 VOLTS 20 0 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 m/z Slide 22

Library Construction-Getting Started Slide 23

Library Construction-Getting Started Overview Select Ionization Mode and Mobile Phase Chemistry. Establish Fragmentation Voltage Range. Establish Fragmentation Endpoint Spacing. Select Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tuning Standards. Select Separation Method and Chromatography for Performance Based Tuning and Library Acquisition. Acquire Spectra for all Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tuning Standards at all fragmentation endpoints and establish appropriate parent/product ion ratios and their control charts. Acquire the spectra for each compound in the library at every fragmentation endpoint. Inspect the data for quality and populate the database. Run Unknowns at all endpoints and search results against all endpoint libraries. Slide 24

Selecting the Ionization Mode and Mobile Phase Chemistry Both ESI and APCI produce artifacts that will complicate the effective use of spectral libraries. Artifact formation is mediated by both mobile phase and source conditions. ESI ESI is complicated by the formation of adducts. Mobile phase composition will strongly affect the types of adducts formed and the extent of their formation. ESI Library reference spectra that have been acquired under adduct free conditions will not match spectra of the same compound acquired under conditions that display extensive adduct formation. In addition some adducts do not show the same breakdown profiles as the protonated molecular ion does. Consequently all spectra across the entire fragmentation voltage range are affected, not simply the low energy spectra. For these reasons, ESI based libraries should be specific to a given chemistry as well as compound class for best match performance. Slide 25

Selecting the Ionization Mode and Mobile Phase Chemistry cont d APCI APCI does not suffer from adduct formation as extensively as does ESI. APCI however does display ions that originate from thermal decomposition. Such ions can be variable in their relative intensities and are just as destructive to library matches as are ESI adduct formations. Moreover the sensitivity to thermal decomposition is more dependent on source cleanliness and maintenance than is ESI. On balance however the occurrence of thermal decomposition in APCI is much less frequent than adduct formation in ESI. If the compound classes under study do not undergo thermal decomposition them APCI, especially positive ion APCI, will offer exceptional reliability with this approach. Slide 26

Selecting the Ionization Mode and Mobile Phase Chemistry cont d Recommended Mobile Phase Systems--ESI 10mM Ammonium Formate in H 2 O versus Acetonitrile This mobile phase is useful in both positive and negative ion work for compounds that are moderate to strong bases or acids. Can enhance Ammonium and sodium ion adduct formation. 0.1% Formic Acid in H 2 O versus 0.1% Formic Acid in Acetonitrile This mobile phase is useful in positive ion work for compound classes that are weak to strong solution-phase bases. If the compounds in the class can form HCl salts, this mobile phase will like be satisfactory in positive ion mode. 0.05% TFA in H 2 O versus 0.05% TFA in Acetonitrile This mobile phase is useful in positive ion work for compound classes that are very weak bases. TFA can cause Ion Suppression and difficulty due to ion persistence in negative ion mode. Slide 27

Selecting the Ionization Mode and Mobile Phase Chemistry cont d Recommended Mobile Phase Systems--APCI 10mM Ammonium Formate in H 2 O versus Methanol May enhance the formation of Ammonium adducts in positive ion and may generate Formate adducts in negative ion. H 2 O versus Methanol Simple, clean and general mobile phase for non-polar compounds such as steroids. Useful in positive ion. Slide 28

Fragmentation Voltage Range The fragmentation range must be decided. The more diverse the library the wider the range will most likely be. MINIMUM FRAGMENTATION ENDPOINT The minimum fragmentation voltage is that which will give a protonated molecular ion with little fragmentation, for the most fragile of the expected compounds. MAXIMUM FRAGMENTATION ENDPOINT The maximum fragmentation voltage is that which will give an informative spectrum with the most difficult to fragment compound expected, but which will still allow 20-30% of the molecular ion to be measured. Slide 29

Fragmentation Endpoint Spacing The Agilent 1100 LCMSD SL can acquire spectra at up to 4 different fragmentation voltages simultaneously. The Agilent approach uses four equally spaced fragmentation endpoints over the fragmentation range. The following endpoint were found to be useful for the indicted compound classes using Ammonum Acetate buffers in Positive Ion Mode. Pesticides as a class seem to be more fragile under these conditions than does the drug class. As such the pesticide library is acquired with a shorter voltage range and with shorter endpoint spacing than is the drug library. PESTICIDES 60V Level LOW1; 120V Level LOW2; 180V Level MID; 240V Level HIGH DRUGS 75V Level LOW1; 150V Level LOW2; 225V Level MID; 300V Level HIGH Slide 30

Selecting Tuning Compounds for the Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tuning Procedure Each fragmentation endpoint will be represented by a library acquired at that endpoint voltage. Each fragmentation endpoint is represented by a tuning standard that gives an informative spectrum with reproducible parent/product ion ratios at that specific fragmentation voltage. A control chart for these ratios is maintained. As long as the ion ratios for each of the four performance based tuning are within limits, acquired spectra from unknowns at all four endpoints will match those in the respective libraries for the same compound. An example of such a control chart is shown in the following slide. Slide 31

Fragmentation Endpoint Tuning Compounds Ion Ratio Control Chart QC's + ESI Ion Ratios 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Azinphosmethyl 160/318 Azinphosmethyl 132/160 benomyl 192/291 Flumalslam 262/326 Flumalslam 129/326 Siduron 94/233 Siduron 137/233 0.2 Siduron 94/137 0 1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 Sample analysis # Slide 32

Selecting Tuning Compounds for the Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tuning Procedure..cont d Tuning compounds could be a compound in the library or it may be something completely removed from the compound classes in the library. As long as the following characteristics are present at the fragmentation endpoint voltage for which the compound is selected.. the fragmentation tuning compound will serve well. At the fragmentation endpoint. The spectrum must display the parent ion and at least one product ion A change in the fragmentation voltage should produce a significant change in the spectrum. An example of this magnitude of the expected change is shown in the following slide. By following the procedures in these slides, it is possible to specify and locate fragmentation performance both one the instrument that generated the library and on other instruments of the same model. The fragmentation setpoints can be located with great precision. Slide 33

Flumetsulam + ESI ion ratios 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 262/326 129/326 0-10 0 10 20 Frag volt change Slide 34

Chromatography for API LC/MS Spectral Library Acquisition--- Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tuning A gradient method is established for running the fragmentation based tuning standards and the library. Ideally the same method will be used for the fragmentation based tune and the library. The chromatography should start at a low enough organic composition to assure retention of the least retentive compound expected in the library. The gradient should extend to a sufficiently high organic composition to insure elution of the most retentive compounds. The library compounds will be run one at a time but the fragmentation based tuning standards would be run as a mixture. Slide 35

Acquisition of Performance (Fragmentation) Based Tune Data and the Library The mixture of fragmentation based tune standards is run at each of the expected endpoints. On the Agilent 1100 LCMSD this is done in one injection by setting up the MS acquisition parameters to include 4 signals each at a unique fragmentation endpoint. The ion ratios between the parent and selected product ions of the CID process are calculated and a control chart is set up as previously indicated. At this time adjustments cold be made to the endpoints to optimize the ion ratios that will guide the performance base tune. Each compound in the library is run at each of the four fragmentation endpoints. Every 10-20 library compounds, the fragmentation tune compounds mixture is run and the ion ratios are plotted on the control chart. Ion ratios should be constant about a mean without an upward or a downward trend. Slide 36

Inspection of Spectral Data At each fragmentation endpoint the spectrum of the compound is examined for data consistent with the compound namely it is important to note if the protonated molecular ion is consistent with the molecular weight of the compound. The spectrum should be background subtracted. The S/N ratio of the spectrum is also noted. If the signal is weak the noise may overpower the useful data. The top ten ions in the spectrum should all be from the compound and not from noise. Typically if the S/N of the TIC was greater than 20-30:1 at the fragmentation endpoint, the data will be useful. The UV data can often help locate the correct peak in cases of weak ionization and/or complex chromatograms due to impure standards. Slide 37

Population of the NIST API Spectral Database Agilent Application Note 5988-5445E was an earlier version of Agilent s approach to performance based Tuning for API spectral library creation. It differs by only two significant points. 1) the newer technique described in this presentation uses four (4) fragmentation endpoint to establish the library. The application note 5988-5445E used three fragmentation endpoints. The addition of another fragmentation endpoint increases the likelihood that at least two endpoints will be of sufficient quality to establish a unique ID 2)The fragmentation endpoints in the newer technique described in this presentation use specific fragmentation localizing compounds for each fragmentation endpoint. The older technique described in Agilent Application Note 5988-5445E used the mass axis calibration tune mixture as the fragmentation endpoint locating standard. The new procedure described in this presentation can localize the endpoints (especially the low fragmentation energy points) with better accuracy between instruments and with better precision. Slide 38

Population of the NIST API Spectral Database Consult the Agilent Application Note 5988-5445E starting on page 4 Procedure for adding LC/MSD spectra into the NIST Mass Spectral search Program[2,3] All instructions in Agilent Application Note 5988-5445E are identical to those required to populate the NIST database for the newer approach detailed in this presentation. The only exception is that there are four fragmentation library entries in the new approach compared with three in the older approach detailed in Agilent Application Note 5988-5445E When all entries are completed the database is ready to use for compound spectra acquired under the same conditions. Slide 39

Pesticide Library User Contributed using the Agilent Approach to API Spectral Libraries Slide 40

Pesticide Library Protocol Overview This protocol describes the procedure and acceptance criteria for adding new compounds for use in a CID library on the Agilent 1100 LCMSD SL. In general compounds are analyzed at about 1 mg/ml by LC using a C18 50x2.1 mm column with 3 um particles using a gradient of 5 to 95 % Acetonitrile in 25 mm Ammonium Acetate at 0.3 ml/min. The UV spectrum and mass spectrum at four different fragmentor voltages are collected for both positive electrospray ionization. The four-fragmentor voltages correspond roughly to 60V (L1), 120V (L2), 180V (MID), and 240V (HIGH). The exact fragmentor voltages are bases on achieving historical ion ratios for the QC compounds at each energy (L1, L2, MID, and HIGH) for positive detection. Once the QC ion rations show agreement with the historical values new library spectra can be acquired and stored. Slide 41

Pesticide Library Ionization Mode and Fragmentation Endpoints This is a library of pesticides acquired under POSITIVE ION-ESI/25mM AMMONIUM ACETATE-ACETONITRILE conditions. Gradient elution from 5% to 95% Acetonitrile on a C18 column was employed. The four fragmentation endpoints used in the pesticide database are: 60 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL LOW 1 FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY 120 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL LOW 2 FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY 180 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL.. MID FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY 240 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL HIGH FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY Slide 42

Pesticide Library Fragmentation Endpoint Standards 60 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL LOW 1 FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY H 3 C O O CH 3 Azinphos-methyl N S N P S N O MW=317 [M+H] + = 318 Slide 43

Pesticide Library Fragmentation Endpoint Standards 120 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL LOW 2 FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY O Benomyl NH N CH 3 NH N O O CH 3 MW=290 [M+H] + = 291 Slide 44

Pesticide Library Fragmentation Endpoint Standards 180 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL MID FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY H 3 C N Flumetsulam N O N N S HN O F F MW=325 [M+H] + = 326 Slide 45

Pesticide Library Fragmentation Endpoint Standards 240 VOLTS FRAGMENTOR NOMINAL HIGH FRAGMENTOR ENDPOINT LIBRARY Siduron O NH NH CH 3 MW=232 [M+H] + = 233 Slide 46

Pesticide Library Ion Ratios and QC Limits Positive ion detection Fragmentation Endpoint Standard Energy m/z values for ion ratios Acceptable intensity ion ratios Azinphosmethyl L1 160/318 0.74-0.95 132/160 0.22 0.41 Benomyl L2 192/291 0.34 0.46 Flumetsulam M 262/326 0.2 0.3 129/326 0.19 0.29 Siduron H 94/233 0.5 0.78 137/233 0.87 1.15 94/137 0.57 0.69 Slide 47

Fragmentation Standard Solutions A mixed solution of all four fragmentation endpoint standards is made up in acetonitrile. The final concentration is 1mg/ml of each component. Benomyl may show some instability on storage so the solutions should be made fresh. One (1) microliter injections are made into the LC/MS system resulting in 1 microgram on column. Slide 48

Fragmentation Based Tune -Suggested Procedure Construct a sequence of methods where the fragmentor voltage varies from - 10 to +10 volts about the nominal fragmentation endpoints of 60, 120, 180 and 240Volts. Eg: Method 1 will have voltages of 50, 110, 170, 230 Volts. Method 2 will have voltages of 51, 111, 171, and 231 Volts. Method 20 will have voltages of 70 130, 190, and 250 Volts. Determine and record which voltages produce the closest match to the ion ratios specified for each fragmentation endpoint. At these measured voltages the reference instrument on which the library was acquired and the Users instrument will give API spectra that will generate good matches with the NIST search engine for each fragmentation endpoint. Each compound will generate FOUR spectra one at each endpoint. Each spectrum will be searched against the spectral library corresponding to its endpoint. Thus each injection will have four sets of search results, one at each endpoint. An deal match shows a positive identification for the same compound on each of the four libraries. Slide 49

Conclusions The theories and experimental procedures described in this presentation will allow chemists to make their own API libraries within the limits of the technique. Very good search hits can be had with careful implementation. The Pesticide Library serves as one example of such an implementation. Careful interpretation of search results is important in reaching supportable identifications. Slide 50