Spatial Optimization of CoCoRAHS Network in Tennessee. Joanne Logan Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science University of Tennessee

Similar documents
CoCoRaHS. Community Collaborative Rain, Hail, & Snow Network. Ashley Wolf Meteorologist NWS Green Bay Northeast Wisconsin CoCoRaHS Coordinator

National Weather Service Greenville-Spartanburg, Forecast Office

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

NJ Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network

Drought Update May 11, 2018

National Weather Service Flood Forecast Needs: Improved Rainfall Estimates

Citizen Science Networks

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY May 2018

Applications/Users for Improved S2S Forecasts

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY June 2018

CoCoRaHS. Citizens monitoring precipitation in their backyards... filling in the gaps

3.6. support remote sensing, weather forecasting and other atmospheric and hydrologic research (Cifelli, et al, 2005).

Weather can change quickly...are you on top of the changes?

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

THE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE RAIN, HAIL AND SNOW NETWORK (COCORAHS) A GREAT WAY TO LEARN AND TEACH ABOUT OUR CLIMATE

Local Precipitation Variability

USGS ATLAS. BACKGROUND

Weather Resources for Forensics

CoCoRaHs in Missouri: Four Years Later, the Importance of Observations

What Can Citizen Scientists Tell Us about Drought?

Examination Copy COMAP Inc. Not For Resale

The Role of Citizen Science in Weather and Climate Research

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

Condition Monitoring: A New System for Drought Impacts Reporting through CoCoRaHS

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

GIS in Weather and Society

Texas Statewide Mesonet Network (TexMesonet) Dr. Kantave Greene 11/15/17

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

CoCoRaHS and the Drought Monitor (Help us help you!) Colorado Climate Center

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY February 2017

P1.24A COCO RAHS COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE RAIN AND HAIL STUDY. Nolan J. Doesken 1 Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY June 2017

Photo: Kristy Johnson. Training Slide Show. Because every drop counts! V10.1

The Climate of Payne County

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY November 2017

The Delaware Environmental Observing System

Climate Information for Managing Risk. Victor Murphy NWS Southern Region Climate Service Program Mgr. June 12, 2008

Montana Mesonet: Progress Report

What Can Citizen Scientists Tell Us about Drought?

CoCoRaHS. Carolina PAGES Hurricane Matthew in South Carolina. CoCoRaHS Observers Activity During Hurricane Matthew.

Improving Understanding of Drought Impacts through Citizen Science

CISA & CoCoRaHS. June This month's newsletter includes: 20 Years of CoCoRaHS!

The Climate of Murray County

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY June 2016

Eastern Shore Weather and Climate. Bill Sammler Warning Coordination Meteorologist National Weather Service Wakefield, VA

New Forecast Section. connection. Volume 3 Issue 4 April 2012

Flood Forecasting Methods and Models Calgary, Alberta February 19, 2014

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

ARKANSAS CoCoRaHS MARCH MADNESS RESULTS. Spring, 2013

Community Collaborative RAin, Hail and Snow network. CoCoRaHS.

The Catch CLEAN THE DUST OUT OF YOUR RAIN GAUGE. FORT COLLINS, CO Friday, July 15, CoCo Folks

The Climate of Bryan County

COMMUNITY SERVICE AREA

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY April 2017

Christopher ISU

The Climate of Grady County

The Climate of Marshall County

13.2 USING VIRTUAL GLOBES TO IMPROVE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS IN THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

GIS DISASTER MAPPING TO UPDATE WARNING SYSTEMS

About places and/or important events Landmarks Maps How the land is, hills or flat or mountain range Connected to maps World Different countries

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Earthquakes. & Expansive Soils

Ground Water Protection Council 2017 Annual Forum Boston, Massachusetts. Ben Binder (303)

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION BY MEANS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

Arizona Climate Summary February 2012

The Climate of Haskell County

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project CLIMATE. Basic Climatology Colorado Climate Center

The Climate of Kiowa County

NWSEO CALLS FOR NATIONAL CLIMATE SERVICE TO BE MADE PART OF THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

CoCoRaHS Condition Monitoring. Webinar with Carolinas Observers January 25, 2017

BSYSE 456/556 Surface Hydrologic Processes and Modeling

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY October 2016

The Climate of Texas County

Operational Hydrologic Ensemble Forecasting. Rob Hartman Hydrologist in Charge NWS / California-Nevada River Forecast Center

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

Operational Monsoon Monitoring at NCEP

NYS Mesonet Data Access Policy

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY March 2018

MPEX DATA MANAGEMENT

Tracking the Climate Of Northern Colorado Nolan Doesken State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY August 2015

Arizona Climate Summary May 2013

The Climate of Pontotoc County

MODELLING FROST RISK IN APPLE TREE, IRAN. Mohammad Rahimi

THE BEST POLICY (SMART) DECISIONS COME FROM SPATIALLY CONNECTED GOVERNMENT

Rainfall-River Forecasting: Overview of NOAA s Role, Responsibilities, and Services

Day of the Last Spring Freeze?

Complete Weather Intelligence for Public Safety from DTN

Kentucky Weather Hazards: What is Your Risk?

The Climate of Seminole County

The MRCC and Monitoring Drought in the Midwest

Thunderstorm Forecasting and Warnings in the US: Applications to the Veneto Region

CASA WX DFW URBAN DEMONSTRATION NETWORK

UTAH S STATEWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Hourly Precipitation Data Documentation (text and csv version) February 2016

The National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) Moving the Nation from Reactive to Proactive Drought Risk Management

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

Transcription:

Spatial Optimization of CoCoRAHS Network in Tennessee Joanne Logan Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science University of Tennessee Abstract CoCoRaHS (Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network) is a non-profit, allvolunteer, community-based network of thousands of observers of all ages and backgrounds working together in all fifty states and Canada to measure and map precipitation, By using low-cost rain gauges, incorporating training and education, and taking advantage of an interactive Web-site, high quality daily rainfall data is available for natural resource, education and research applications. CoCoRAHS was established in Tennessee in 2007 and the reported rainfall data have been important to augment the information available for monitoring droughts and floods. However, the distribution of stations is less than ideal; there are no observers in 9 out of 95 counties, only 1 observer in another 13 counties, and several counties have more than 20 observers. Recruitment of volunteers has been very haphazard, with no statewide coordination to optimize the spatial distribution of the observers. Sustained and reliable observation of daily rainfall has also been a problem, with about 450 consistent observers out of more than 1500 who registered as volunteers; more than 500 observers never reported at all. In addition, very little education and outreach have taken place due to lack of involvement by teachers and schools. Logistically, there is too much redundancy and overlap with other rain gauges such as National Weather Service (NWS) Cooperative Observer and other rainfall data reported to the NWS such as ASOS (Automated Surface Observing System). To help improve the network and enhance the educational benefits, a spatial analysis was conducted to 1) find the optimal new locations for CoCoRAHS using spatial information such as topography, currently reporting CoCoRAHS locations, other rain gauge networks such as NWS and 2) optimize the recruitment of new observers for CoCoRAHS, using other spatial information relative to ideal new locations: such as schools, fire halls, master gardens, community gardens, utility plants, UT Extension offices, libraries, transportation offices, city engineering offices, and other organizations that might be interested in the educational aspects, or are open 24/7. The resulting spatial analysis can provide a list of ideal contacts to possibly recruit in this rapidly expanding and useful program. Introduction The National Weather Service is responsible for most of the weather data instrumentation and observation in the U.S. However, due to the gaps in spatial coverage, other agencies and organizations, such as the Corps of Engineers and U.S.

Forest Service, have developed their own mission-specific weather data networks. In addition, many state climate offices and universities have built regional networks (mesonets) to collect weather data. CoCoRaHS (Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network) is an example of a more grassroots, low-cost option to improved spatial coverage of weather observations. CoCoRaHS started as a result of the devastating flash flood that hit Fort Collins, CO in July 1997. It is a non-profit, all-volunteer, community-based network of thousands of observers of all ages and backgrounds working together in all fifty states and Canada to measure and map precipitation, By using low-cost rain gauges, incorporating training and education, and taking advantage of an interactive Web-site, high quality daily rainfall data is available for natural resource, education and research applications. CoCoRAHS was established in Tennessee in 2007 and the reported rainfall data have been important to augment the information available for monitoring droughts and floods. However, as in most states, the distribution of rain gauges in this volunteer network is less than ideal. As of this year, there were no CoCORAHS volunteer observers in 15 out of 95 counties, only 1 observer in another 13 counties, and several counties have more than 20 observers. Recruitment of volunteers has been very haphazard, with no statewide coordination to optimize the spatial distribution of the observers. Sustained and reliable observation of daily rainfall has also been a problem, with only 423 consistent observers out of the more than 1600 who registered as volunteers; in fact, more than 500 observers never reported at all. In addition, very little education and outreach have taken place due to lack of involvement by teachers and schools, as originally imagined for this program. Almost all the currently reporting onservers are individual homeowners, not associated with any agency, organization, or school. The objectives of this study are to 1) summarize the flash flood risks in Tennessee; 2) find optimal new locations for CoCoRAHS rain gauges using spatial information such as topography and demographics, currently reporting CoCoRAHS locations, rain gauges operated by NWS and the University of Tennessee, and 3) identify possible new observers for CoCoRAHS, using spatial information relative to proposed new locations: such as schools, fire halls, master gardens, community gardens, utility plants, UT Extension offices, libraries, transportation offices, city engineering offices, and other organizations that might be interested in the educational or operational aspects of rainfall data, or are open 24/7. Methods Obtain latitude and longitude of currently reporting observers from CoCORAHS admin site, add to GIS map

Add layers: National Weather Service (NWS) Coop Stations, NWS Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) stations, elevation, Block Groups, Counties, Geographic Information Names System (GNIS) Spatial Analyses to optimize location for new rain gauges Results Since the original premise of the establishment of the CoCoRAHS network was for improving flash flood prediction, it is interesting to note that flash floods are reported much more in Tennessee than Colorado (Table 1), at least partially due to the greater population density. However, since Tennessee has to deal with more than 100 flash floods each year, on average, improving spatial coverage of rain gauges is a smart move. Table 1. Flash floods Colorado vs. Tennessee # Flash # Deaths State Area (km 2 Population Pop. Density floods ) est. 2014 (#/km 2 ) (1996-2013) Colorado 269,600 5,268,367 19.5 868 20 Tennessee 109,150 6,495,978 59.5 1933 29 More than 1600 people have signed up on the Tennessee CoCoRAHS website, but there are currently only 423 CoCoRAHS volunteers that regularly report with 266 (62%) reporting for at least 5 years, and 319 (75%) located 8 km or more from a NWS station (Cooperative and ASOS/AWOS). There are a total of 518 rain gauges used in this study, including both the CoCoRAHS and NWS. These rain gauges, if one assumes that each one represents an area with a radius of 8 km, cover 49% of the area of Tennessee. Figure 1. Number of CoCoRAHS observers (currently open) per county, current locations of CoCoRAHS and NWS stations.

Eighty counties out of 95 have at least 1 currently reporting CoCORAHS station (Figure 1). Only 2 counties have no rain gauge at all, including COCoRAHS and NWS. Seventeen counties have just one CoCORAHS observer, and one county, Davidson, has 32 observers (Figure 1). Using block group census data, the number of people (2010) represented by each CoCoRAHS rain gauge ranges from 444 to 25,031 (Figure 2). If the Mission of the NWS is to protect life and property, then efforts to enhance the rain gauge network in Tennessee should focus on the areas with the highest population densities. Out of the 4014 block groups in Tennessee, 2603 (65%) have a population density of 100 per square km or more. Of these, 2453 (94%) do not have a CoCoRAHS observer located within the borders of the block group. In addition to population density, topography is another factor that should be considered in selection of potential new locations for rain gauges. Of the 2453 block groups with high population densities and that do not have a CoCoRAHS volunteer, 316 have an average elevation greater than 300 meters, and are located in 31 different counties, most in East Tennessee. Twenty three of these block groups do not have any rain gauge from any agency within a radius of 8 km. The current focus will be to find cooperators in these block groups. Schools and churches are likely sources for cooperators. Using the GNIS data, there are 14 schools and 38 churches located in the 23 target block groups. Summary and Conclusions This exercise is just one example of how to target the search for volunteers for the CoCoRAHS network. Many of the parameters can be changed, such as radius that each rain gauge is assumed to represent (currently set at 8 km), topography, and population density of the block group (currently set as greater than 100 per square km). Spatial information from additional agencies and organizations such as master

gardeners, county extension offices, police stations, and fire halls can be used to augment the network of potential observers.