Alpine Region Preparatory Action Fund (ARPAF) Project CrossBorder Cross-border mobility in the Alpine Region

Similar documents
Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update. 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Concept note. High-Level Seminar: Accelerating Sustainable Energy for All in Landlocked Developing Countries through Innovative Partnerships

City and SUMP of Ravenna

Briefing. H.E. Mr. Gyan Chandra Acharya

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

New Prospects for Peripheral Rural Regions Helmut Hiess Glasgow, 19th of May 2010

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning in Preparing Territorial Development Strategies

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

SPIMA Spatial dynamics and strategic planning in metropolitan areas

D2. Addressing tourism related mobility

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

RURAL-URBAN PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Figure 10. Travel time accessibility for heavy trucks

High speed network in Hauts-de-France Region. Värnamo, 17 th May 2018

Third Cohesion report February 2004

Community Engagement in Cultural Routes SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation Sara Levi Sacerdotti

Implementation of the ESPON 2020 cooperation program. 16 January 2017 Anneloes van Noordt

Annual Ministerial Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Landlocked Developing Countries

ESPON Factsheet. Italy Austria

Low Density Areas : Places of Opportunity. Enrique Garcilazo, OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development

PART A Project summary

2. Defining fisheries areas

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

The National Spatial Strategy

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Declaration Population and culture

Economic and Social Council

PURR: POTENTIAL OF RURAL REGIONS UK ESPON WORKSHOP Newcastle 23 rd November Neil Adams

The National Policy Strategy for Infrastructure and Spatial Planning CODE24 CONFERENCE. Emiel Reiding

Entrepreneurship on islands and other peripheral regions. Specific Contract No 6511 implementing Framework contract No CDR/DE/16/2015/

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Czech Republic

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

UNCTAD Single-year Expert Meeting on Tourism s Contribution to Sustainable Development

European spatial policy and regionalised approaches

ESPON support for Targeted Analyses Ilona Raugze Director

Statement. H.E Dr. Richard Nduhuura Permanent Representative of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations New York

Raising awareness on mobility costs for households: a lever for changing residential choices and improving local governance?

Developing Quality of Life and Urban- Rural Interactions in BSR

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

How to measure Territorial Cohesion and Cooperation?

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. Anneloes van Noordt MC-member Belgium

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ( )

Vincent Goodstadt. Head of European Affairs METREX European Network

Territorial evidence for a European Urban Agenda TOWN in Europe

The Euroregion, which puts into practice the determination for active cooperation, has led to concrete actions such as:

EU STRATEGY FOR THE ALPINE REGION (EUSALP) PUBLIC CONSULTATION QUESTIONAIRE

SPATIAL STRATEGIES ON THE ISLAND OF IRELAND: FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATION

Poland, European Territory, ESPON Programme Warsaw, 2 July 2007 STRATEGY OF THE ESPON 2013 PROGRAMME

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

EA SEA-WAY Project. 7 th Coordination Meeting. WP5 Development of sustainable passenger transport models for the Adriatic basin and capacity building

Economic and Social Council

Measured & Perceived Sustainability

a national geological survey perspective François ROBIDA BRGM (French Geological Survey)

Contract title: Technical assistance for multi-annual programming of future cross border cooperation programme in the Romania-Serbia cooperation area

Key issues of regional development: DIAMONT WP6 experience. Vincent Briquel, Cemagref, France

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Tackling urban sprawl: towards a compact model of cities? David Ludlow University of the West of England (UWE) 19 June 2014

UN-GGIM: Strengthening Geospatial Capability

Governance in Metropolitan Regions in Germany

Conference on Urban Development Strategies in the Mediterranean Barcelona, March 14-15, 2011

ASEV - Partner presentation

Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Geospatial Technology and Innovation

Ireland 2040 Our Plan. National Planning Framework

KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Workshop on

Central Baltic Programme

Space of flows. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences. Ministry of Development, Republic of Poland

Territorial Cooperation within the Northern Periphery and the Arctic

ALTER ECO Alternative tourist strategies to enhance the local sustainable development of tourism by promoting Mediterranean identity Module 2: Testing

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

European Regional and Urban Statistics

PROTOCOL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION OF 1991 RELATING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

First Findings of Alpine Space Stress Testing Approaches conducive to Implement Smart Specialisation Strategies through Clusters Policy Memo

Regional Plan 4: Integrating Ecosystem Services Mapping into Regional Land Use Planning

Transnational SWOT Analysis

The Governance of Land Use

2018/1 The integration of statistical and geospatial information. The Regional Committee of UN-GGIM: Americas:

TOWNs in Europe. Loris Servillo. Luxemburg, 12 December 2014

6 th GLOBAL SUMMIT ON URBAN TOURISM 4 6 December 2017, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Economic and Social Council

The OSCE s Role in Trade and Transport Facilitation

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARPATHIAN INTEGRATED BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

ESPON evidence on European cities and metropolitan areas

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

Report. Workshop 5: How can atlases help to organise and promote the seas?

reviewed paper EU-Project: Cross-border Spatial Information System with High Added Value (CROSS-SIS) Stefan SANDMANN

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

High-Level Euro-Asia Regional Meeting on Improving Cooperation on Transit, Trade Facilitation and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/67/440/Add.2)]

Cluster and S3:EU-USA COMPARISON OF DATABASE AND MAPPING TOOLS

Transcription:

Alpine Region Preparatory Action Fund (ARPAF) Project CrossBorder Cross-border mobility in the Alpine Region Invitation to tender for the analysis of existing crossborder mobility networks 28 March 2018

Content 1 Context... 3 2 EUSALP EU Strategy for the Alpine Region... 4 3 The project CrossBorder... 5 3.1. Project aims... 6 3.2. Project structure... 7 3.3. Project schedule... 7 3.4. Project outcomes... 8 4 The Study Analysis of existing cross-border mobility networks... 9 4.1 General approach and delimitation... 9 4.2 Description of working steps...10 5 Timeline and reporting...12 6 Financing, timing and procedure...13

1 Context The negative consequences of mobility like noise and air pollution, CO 2 -emssions, or landscape fragmentation can be found in many Alpine countries. Traffic congestions due to overlapping peaks of freight transport, tourism mobility and commuter mobility lead to conflicts among the different stakeholders. Whilst freight transport and partly tourism mobility are on a high level on the agenda of the European Union and most Alpine countries, the role of sustainable commuter mobility to reduce negative impacts has played a less important role in most Alpine countries. The public discourse on sustainable commuter mobility is currently dominated by negative aspects like invasion of privacy and restrictions. However, there are important opportunities for positive connotations of sustainable commuter mobility that can be strengthened. In terms of the reduction of emissions commuter mobility offers a great chance to contribute to reaching ambitious climate targets and to increase quality of life at regional level. Transport networks and services have for a long time been planned in a purely national context, which is no longer in coherence with the ever-increasing passenger flows across borders. This holds particularly true for public transport systems. Commuting across borders is a reality, and most of the transport flows are by cars. Congested roads with a negative impact on economy, society and the environment are the consequence. EUSALP as a multilevel governance approach is a huge opportunity to address these problems and to find common solutions. Available data from Switzerland show as an illustration that the number of commuters travelling every day into Switzerland across the borders has risen from 143 500 in 1996 to a level of 317 800 in 2017. 96% of persons crossing the Swiss borders do so by using their car, only 4% by public transport. Road networks are congested. The situation in some border areas like in Ticino or in the Alpine Rhine valley is so tense, that municipalities have begun to ask for help. Also the public transport networks are not necessarily oriented towards these passenger flows, which is reflected in infrastructure gaps and problems of timetable harmonisation, integrated ticketing systems, travel information and so on. Cross-border mobility concerns various public authorities at different levels (national, regional and local) as well as from different types of players in the system: Municipalities, transport organisations, private companies and the commuters themselves. It needs therefore a true multilevel and cross-institutional governance approach. Cross-border mobility is furthermore affecting metropolitan areas like Geneva, Salzburg and Strasbourg as well as very rural areas such as the French/Swiss Jura mountains and the cross-border regions Engadin-Venosta Valley-Landeck.

2 EUSALP EU Strategy for the Alpine Region i The overarching challenge for the Alpine Region is to balance development and protection through innovative approaches which strengthen this area located in the center of Europe as a living space for people and nature as well as a field for economic and social activities in a sustainable way. Enhancing attractiveness and competitiveness of the Alpine Region as well as reducing social and territorial disparities for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the region constitutes a tailor-made contribution to the growth of the region in line with EU 2020 Strategy objectives. The EU-Strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) aims at ensuring mutually beneficial interaction between the mountain regions at its core and the surrounding lowlands and urban areas, flexibly taking into account the functional relationships existing between these areas. As its main objective, the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region aims to ensure that this region remains one of the most attractive areas in Europe, taking better advantage of its assets and seizing its opportunities for sustainable and innovative development in a European context. The Strategy will focus on areas of (macro) regional mutual interest. Therefore, the priority areas and specific objectives selected should reflect genuine commitment to working together to achieve common solutions to challenges or unused potential. The main objective above will be attained through the following 3 Thematic Policy Areas and priorities as well as one cross-cutting Policy Area: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INNOVATION Objective: Fair access to job opportunities, building on the high competitiveness of the Region MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY Objective: Sustainable internal and external accessibility to all ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY Objective: A more inclusive environmental framework for all and renewable and reliable energy solutions for the future GOVERNANCE, INCLUDING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY Objective: A sound macro-regional governance model for the Region Under the second policy area members of EUSALP Action Groups 4 (Mobility) and 5 (Connectivity) have identified the theme of cross-border mobility as a topic of strategic relevance for their work and therefore decided to collaborate on this topic. With its multilevel govern-

ance approach, EUSALP is a real opportunity to deal with these topics and to search for an Alpine wide understanding and common solutions. 3 The project CrossBorder CrossBorder supports directly the EUSALP Action Plan in the fields of actions 4 and 5. In Action 4, the project helps to remove infrastructure bottlenecks, bridging missing service links, coordinating planning and timetables of public transport, modernising infrastructure, and enhancing cooperation with a special focus on cross-border mobility. For Action 5, the digital accessibility helps to connect people even across borders and to reduce passenger flows. New models like e-services or teleworking, co-working spaces etc. may help to reduce the need to travel. The project idea emerges from both AG4 and AG5 work plans. Both AG's have identified the topic of cross-border mobility as of strategic relevance and as a topic which should be dealt with within EUSALP. Both AG's have agreed already in the elaboration of their respective work plans to work together on this topic. Project partners LEAD PARTNER Swiss Center for Mountain Regions SAB, Switzerland (co-leader EUSALP AG5) PROJECT PARTNERS Office of the Tyrolean Government, Department of Transport Planning, Austria (leader of EUSALP AG4 for the European Region Tyrol South Tyrol Trentino) CIPRA International (member in advisory role in EUSALP AG4) Observers Federal Office for Spatial Development ARE, Switzerland Aosta Valley, Transport department, Italy Ministry of Infrastructure of the Republic of Slovenia Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, France

3.1. Project aims 1. To establish an overview of cross-border mobility across the Alpine Region with a focus on daily commuting; 2. To identify gaps of cross-border mobility with respect to infrastructure and soft factors; 3. To identify solutions for facilitating daily cross-border passenger flows by sustainable transport modes through new opportunities offered by digitalisation; 4. To provide a basis for future activities of AG4 and AG5 of EUSALP; 5. To implement the findings in several hotspots for cross-border-commuting in the Alpine Region. For the analysis in the context of the ARPAF call, the geographical area of the Alpine Space (see map below) is considered.

3.2. Project structure WP2 Analysis of existing cross-border mobility networks WP3 Collection of existing cooperation models for cross-border mobility WP4 WP1 Management Improve cross-border mobility and reduce passenger flows WP5 Formulation of recommendations for AG4 and AG5 WP6 Implementation 3.3. Project schedule

3.4. Project outcomes 1. Analysis in maps and report of existing cross-border mobility networks for passenger transport. 2. Collection of existing cooperation models for cross-border mobility. 3. Identification of gaps in cross-border mobility (Infrastructure and soft-factors, e.g. timetables, ticketing,...). 4. Identification of solutions to facilitate cross-border passenger flows. 5. Formulation of recommendations for further actions The following target groups will use the outputs: Public authorities at different levels (national, regional, local), Service providers in public transport, Engineers and planners in transport networks, End users are the commuters and the local population which will be relieved from the heavy burden of congested roads. Local enterprises The outcomes will serve as basis for future actions to be taken by AG4 and AG5 as well as other AG's of EUSALP or other supranational bodies such as the Alpine Convention or national and regional authorities. By increasing the political awareness and providing reliable data, the work of this project will thus lay the basis and pave the way for further actions. The project has amongst others a clear link to COM(2017)307: Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. The project will amongst others also integrate findings from the ASP project Alpstar and the IRVA project PEMO. It is fully in line with the EUSALP Action Plan 2nd objective Sustainable internal and external accessibility to all.

4 The Study Analysis of existing cross-border mobility networks Under CrossBorder Work Package 2, the analysis will serve to identify the main hotspots of cross-border commuting in the areas where this phenomenon is most acute in terms of lack of infrastructure and services, congested transport systems (road and/or rail transport), heavy impact on social life, impact on the environment etc. This analysis will thus also help to increase alpine-wide awareness of the problems of cross-border commuting and will lay the basis for further action also beyond the scope of the project. Focus area for the analysis is the perimeter as EUSALP and cross-border hot spots within this perimeter. This action runs mainly under the leadership of the leader of Work Package 2, the Office of the Tyrolean Government, Department of Transport Planning. Gathering the corresponding commuting data will be done by an external mandate, accompanied by a working group consisting of all Project Partners and Observers and other relevant stakeholders, such as experts of the Alpine Convention WG Transport, to be established for this purpose. In addition, the WP2 leader Tyrol will facilitate the involvement of EUSALP Action Group 4 members. The full list of AG4 members can be found here. 4.1 General approach and delimitation The data collection on commuter mobility shall focus on already existing data. As far as these data are available from local or regional authorities and not older than 5 years, they shall be collected from these sources. Only data that do not exist or that are clearly outdated shall be collected, e.g. by systematic inquiries of local enterprises, offices and production sites, where commuters are employed or via business support organizations. The results of these inquiries shall be verified and calibrated by random sampling at border crossing points. Against this background, this call for tenders refers to gathering of daily cross-border commuter flows for all border regions in the Alpine Regions. The analysis will provide the basis for selecting several hotspots (5 to 10) in the Alpine Region for cross-border commuting. There, a series of workshops will be held under CrossBorder WP6. Some examples are listed below.

Nice: IT <=> FR Genève: FR <=> CH Como, Milano: CH <=> IT Basel: FR, DE <=> CH Lake Constance 1 : CH <=> DE <=> AT <=> FL Salzburg: DE => AT Graz: SI <=> AT Trieste, Gorizia: SI <=> IT In these areas, the number of daily commuters shall be gathered for the relevant commuting routes (at least 5 % of the daily average total), on road by private vehicles (car drivers, car passengers, motorcycles, etc.) and by public transport (railways, trams, buses, etc.) Where there is a relevant share of border crossing pedestrians and/or cyclists (at least 5 % of all commuters), their data shall be gathered as well. In addition to numbers, mode of transport and routes, also commuting distances and estimates of monthly costs shall be gathered. The data shall be assigned to the time slots: 1. from home to working: before 7:00, 7:00 8:00, 8:00 9:00, after 9:00, 2. from working back home: before 15:00, 15:00 17:00, 17:00 19:00, after 19:00. 4.2 Description of working steps The analysis shall be structured in several working steps, project proposals shall illustrate their chosen approach, at least for the following working steps: Working step 1 Data overview: Provide an overview of available data on commuter traffic at national and regional level, structured along relevant indicators (e.g. differentiation into transport modes, time slots, etc.). A synthesis of this data overview shall give an estimate on the need of additional data collection. Estimated effort: approx. 15 working days Working step 2 Methodology for bottom-up data collection: available data will probably have to be complemented through additional data collection 2, e.g. through a bot- 1 The Interreg project PEMO provides a useful source of knowledge in the Lake Constance area 2 The access to data sources and regional stakeholders can be facilitated through the support by a dedicated working group consisting of CrossBorder Project Partners and Observers, members of EUSALP AG4 and AG5 and members of the Alpine Convention Working Group on Transport.

tom-up approach at company level. In this working step, the project proposal needs to specify an approach for the data collection (phone, online survey), number of companies to be included, etc. Due to the challenge of obtaining comparative data in different cross-border regions, this working step should also develop recommendations for a common data collection method in the Alpine Region. Estimated effort: approx. 10 working days Working step 3 Data integration: this working step shall integrate the results of the additional data collection with existing data as identified in step 1. Results shall be displayed in excel tables or a user-friendly database which allows an easy navigation of indicators and hot spots. Estimated effort: approx. 30 working days Working step 4 Graphic illustration: In this last working step, a graphic presentation of the cross-border commuter traffic flows shall be developed (see as example maps of Swiss cross-border commuting regions below). Estimated effort: approx. 5 working days Overall, a maximum of 60 working days (including approx. four days for project meetings/presentations) is foreseen for the analysis. If additional working steps are considered necessary, these can be suggested by the bidder.

5 Timeline and reporting Working step 1 Working step 2 Working step 3 Working step 4 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Milestone 1: 8 th EUSALP AG4 meeting, 19 June 2018, Trento Presentation by PP Tyrol to AG4 members of initial data overview (Working step 1) & exchange with members Milestone 2: Intermediate results of working steps 1 and 2 by 31 August 2018 Written report on data collection and methodology Milestone 3: CrossBorder PSC meeting, 3 September 2018, Feldkirch Presentation by expert of intermediate report (working steps 1 and 2), exchange with PPs and observers. Milestone 4: 9 th EUSALP AG4 meeting, October 2018, location tbc Presentation by expert of working steps 1 to 3, exchange with AG4 members. Milestone 5: CrossBorder OSC meeting, 21-22 November 2018, Innsbruck (tbc) Presentation by expert of working steps 1 to 3 & proposal for working step 4, exchange with PPs and observers. Milestone 6: Submission of completed analysis by 21 December 2018 Final written report, excel tables / user-friendly database, graphic illustration of cross-border commuter traffic flows.

6 Financing, timing and procedure Deadline to submit proposals: 13 April 2018 Decision on successful tender: 30 April 2018 The project proposals will be evaluated according to the against the principle of most economically advantageous tender (MEAT). The criteria are the following. Understanding of the task and description of a feasible methodology to carry out the proposed working steps. Appropriate proposal for illustrating the results of the study (under consideration of existing maps, webtools, etc.) Expertise of the contractor in the field of passenger mobility (to be shown by relevant reference projects) Expertise of the contractor with data-collection and data (to be shown by relevant reference projects) Expertise of the contractor to carry out bottom-up data collection in (all) Alpine languages, to be shown by language skills (some support can be expected from EU- SALP members, e.g. for Slovenian) Proven experience with international projects to perform written work and to present results in English language Knowledge of the specific challenges of the Alpine Region and experience with projects carried out in the geographic target area. i https://www.alpine-region.eu/