MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Similar documents
MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 12: Summary. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 11: Scanning Probe Microscopy. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 2: UPS

EE 527 MICROFABRICATION. Lecture 5 Tai-Chang Chen University of Washington

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Fundamentals of Nanoscale Film Analysis

Silver Thin Film Characterization

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

ECE Semiconductor Device and Material Characterization

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

Photons in the universe. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

Ion Implantation. alternative to diffusion for the introduction of dopants essentially a physical process, rather than chemical advantages:

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE

Surface analysis techniques

CHAPTER 4 Structure of the Atom

Práctica de laboratorio número 6: Non-Rutherford scattering near the MeV 12 C(p,p) 12 C resonance

Atomic Collisions and Backscattering Spectrometry

Structure analysis: Electron diffraction LEED TEM RHEED

Surface Analysis - The Principal Techniques

APPLICATION OF THE NUCLEAR REACTION ANALYSIS FOR AGING INVESTIGATIONS

Nanoelectronics 09. Atsufumi Hirohata Department of Electronics. Quick Review over the Last Lecture

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

Table 1.1 Surface Science Techniques (page 19-28) Acronym Name Description Primary Surface Information Adsorption or selective chemisorption (1)

Physics 100 PIXE F06

Ion-beam techniques. Ion beam. Electrostatic Accelerators. Van de Graaff accelerator Pelletron Tandem Van de Graaff

The Configuration of the Atom: Rutherford s Model

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

AP 5301/8301 Instrumental Methods of Analysis and Laboratory Lecture 11 Ion Beam Analysis

Surface Analysis - The Principal Techniques

CHARACTERIZATION of NANOMATERIALS KHP

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

Lecture 5: Characterization methods

Energy Spectroscopy. Excitation by means of a probe

Surface and Interface Characterization of Polymer Films

Methods of surface analysis

Photon Interactions in Matter

Spectroscopy on Mars!

Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Electron Rutherford Backscattering, a versatile tool for the study of thin films

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Lecture 12. study surfaces.

Ion Implantation ECE723

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

Light element IBA by Elastic Recoil Detection and Nuclear Reaction Analysis R. Heller

Analysis of light elements in solids by elastic recoil detection analysis

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

LOW-TEMPERATURE Si (111) HOMOEPITAXY AND DOPING MEDIATED BY A MONOLAYER OF Pb

Accreting neutron stars provide a unique environment for nuclear reactions

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Preamble: Emphasis: Material = Device? MTSE 719 PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLIDS

PHL424: Nuclear fusion

X-ray Spectroscopy. Interaction of X-rays with matter XANES and EXAFS XANES analysis Pre-edge analysis EXAFS analysis

object objective lens eyepiece lens

Department of Natural Sciences Clayton State University. Physics 3650 Quiz 1

EE 212 FALL ION IMPLANTATION - Chapter 8 Basic Concepts

Quantum Mechanics. An essential theory to understand properties of matter and light. Chemical Electronic Magnetic Thermal Optical Etc.

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

1 Introduction COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. 1.1 HowdoweDefinetheSurface?

Lecture 6 Plasmas. Chapters 10 &16 Wolf and Tauber. ECE611 / CHE611 Electronic Materials Processing Fall John Labram 1/68

4. Inelastic Scattering

Chemical Engineering 412

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

( 1+ A) 2 cos2 θ Incident Ion Techniques for Surface Composition Analysis Ion Scattering Spectroscopy (ISS)

QUANTUM MECHANICS AND ATOMIC STRUCTURE

Chapter 9. Electron mean free path Microscopy principles of SEM, TEM, LEEM

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

ANALYSIS OF PLASMA FACING MATERIALS IN CONTROLLED FUSION DEVICES. Marek Rubel

MODERN TECHNIQUES OF SURFACE SCIENCE

Electron Microscopy I

Scanning Probe Microscopy. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

Solid Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films

The design of an integrated XPS/Raman spectroscopy instrument for co-incident analysis

Chapter 9 Ion Implantation

Ion Implant Part 1. Saroj Kumar Patra, TFE4180 Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology ( NTNU )

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Data for Analytical Applications October 2013

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FOR PHONON TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS AT SOLID INTERFACES

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

Particle nature of light & Quantization

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Structure of Surfaces

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Radiation (Particle) Detection and Measurement

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) Thomas Sky

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Atomic Physics. Chapter 6 X ray. Jinniu Hu 24/12/ /20/13

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Radioactivity - Radionuclides - Radiation

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM MECHANICS

Transcription:

2015 Fall Semester MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST 1

Course Information Syllabus 1. Overview of various characterization techniques (1 lecture) 2. Chemical analysis techniques (7 8 lectures) 2.1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) 2.2. Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS) 2.3. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) 2.4. X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) 3. Ion beam based techniques (4 lecture) 3.1. Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) 3.2. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) Mid-term Exam 1 (30%) 4. Diffraction and imaging techniques (6 7 lectures) 4.1. Basic diffraction theory 4.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) & X-ray Reflectometry (XRR) 4.3. Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) & Low Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED) 4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) & EDS 4.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Mid-term Exam 2 (30%) 5. Scanning probe techniques (2 lectures) 5.1. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) & associated techniques 5.2. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM)? 6. Summary: Examples of real materials characterization (1 lecture) Final Exam (40%)

Course Information Exams & Make-up Class Lecture 9 Lecture 13 Lecture 14 Lecture 10 Lecture 11 Lecture 15 Lecture 16 No Lecture No Lecture Mid exam 1? Mid exam 1? Mid-term exam period No Lecture No Lecture Mid exam 2? Mid exam 2? Lecture 17 Lecture 18 No Lecture Make-up Lecture 12 Lecture 1 (7 pm)? Make-up Lecture (7 pm)? Lecture 19 Lecture 20 Lecture 21 Lecture 22 Final exam period Final exam Mid-term exam 1: 10/13 (Tue) or 10/15 (Thurs) Mid-term exam 2: 11/17 (Tue) or 11/19 (Thurs) Final exam: 12/17 (Thurs), 09:00 11:45 Make-up class 1: 7 pm on 10/28 (Wed) or 10/30 (Fri) Possibly second make-up class in Nov or Dec

RBS: Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group RBS accurately measures the composition and depth profile of thin films, including hydrogen. Quantitative? Yes Destructive? No Detection limits? 0.001 10 at% Lateral resolution (Probe size)? 1 mm Chemical bonding? No Depth resolution? 5 20 nm ~

Key Applications & Instrument Configuration Determine thickness and composition of thin films Measure hydrogen Determine film density from a film of known thickness Assess damage to crystal structure as a result of processing Quantification of films on whole wafers (up to 300 mm) Qualify & monitor deposition systems (also fab-to-fab comparisons) Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group MeV ions from an electrostatic accelerator are focused on a sample in a vacuum chamber for analysis. Typically, 2 MeV He ++ ions are used.

Fundamental Principles Kinematics of elastic scattering Conservation of energy and momentum 1 2 MM 1vv 2 = 1 2 MM 1vv 2 1 + 1 2 MM 2 2vv 2 MM 1 vv = MM 1 vv 1 cos θθ + MM 2 vv 2 cos φφ 0 = MM 1 vv 1 sin θθ + MM 2 vv 2 sin φφ v 2 v v 1 For M 1 < M 2, kinematic factor K EE 1 = MM 2 2 MM 2 1 sin 2 θθ 1/2 + MM 1 cos θθ EE 0 MM 2 + MM 1 (listed in Handout #4, Append. 1) 2 For a given M 1 and M 2, smallest K is at θ = 180 o Different types of atoms, M 2 largest change in E 1 when θ = 180 o Hence, backscattering spectrometry, though θ ~170 o in practice

Fundamental Principles Scattering Cross Section THIN TARGET: N S ATOMS/cm 2 (= N t), Q E 0 of incident particle of M 1 K M2 E 0 that this particle possesses at any angle θ after an elastic collision with an initially stationary M 2 How frequently such a collision occur at a certain angle θ? differential scattering cross section Number of particles scattered into ddω = QQ NN SS Number of particles scattered into the detector with Ω = QQ NN SS Ω dddd θθ ddω (in RBS, solid angle Ω is small, 10-2 steradian or less, so average can be used instead of differential) ddω ddσσ θθ ddω ddω = QQ NN SS 1 Ω Ω = QQ NN SS σσ θθ Ω dddd θθ ddω ddω Ω (average) scattering cross section [cm 2 /steradian]

Fundamental Principles Scattering Cross Section Without considering recoil of the target atom (M 1 << M 2 ), i.e., the target atom is stationary all the time σσ θθ = qq2 ZZ 1 ZZ 2 4EE 2 1 sin 4 θθ/2 Including the recoil effect, Z 1 : atomic number of incident particle Z 2 : atomic number of target atom q: elemental charge E: energy of incident particle (For derivation see pp. 21-24 of Handout #5) σσ θθ = qq2 ZZ 1 ZZ 2 4EE 2 sin 4 θθ 2 2 MM 1 MM 2 2 + ~4% correction in the case of He (M 1 =4) incident on Si (M 1 =28) Rutherford Scattering Cross Section, σ(θ) for 1 MeV 4 He is listed in Handout #4, Appendix 2.

Fundamental Principles Deviation from Rutherford Scattering Assumption to derive Rutherford scattering cross section: scattering due to the repulsion of two positively charged nuclei of atomic number Z 1 and Z 2 Meaning that incident atom penetrates well inside the orbital of the atomic electrons closest distance < K shell electron radius EE > qq2 ZZ 1 ZZ 2, where a 0 is Bohr radius. aa 0 ~10 kev for He scattering from Si ~340 kev for He scattering from Au At low energy, correction from the screening should be considered. σσ ssss = σσ θθ F At higher energy, departure from the Rutherford scattering cross section due to the interaction of the incident particle with the nucleus of the target atom ~9.6 MeV for He ions incident on Si

Fundamental Principles Stopping power (stopping cross section) Energy loss of MeV light ions (such as He) in solids: electronic energy loss (interaction with electrons, excited or ejected) Negligible nuclear energy loss dddd dddd = 2ππqq4 2 ZZ 1 NNZZ EE 2 MM 1 mm 2mmvv2 ln II de/dx : ev / Å (1/ρ) de/dx : ev / (µg/cm 2 ), where ρ is mass density (1/N) de/dx : ev / (atoms/cm 2 ), where N is atomic density listed in Appendix 3 (Handout #4)

Fundamental Principles Energy transfer from a projectile to a target atom in an elastic two-body collision concept of kinematic factor and capability of mass perception Likelihood of occurrence of such a two-body collision concept of scattering cross section and capability of quantitative analysis of atomic composition Average energy loss of an atom moving through a dense medium concept of stopping cross section and capability of depth perception

Energy Width in Backscattering t= Q: which one is larger, E Au or E Au? E Au Surface Au peak at higher energy than surface Al peak tt dddd EE iiii = dddd dddd dddd dddd tt iiii At t, EE tt = EE 0 EE iiii = EE 0 EE 1 tt = KK AAAA EE tt tt cos θθ dddd = tt KK AAAA + dddd iiii dddd dddd oooooo tt cos θθ dddd tt dddd iiii dddd + KK dddd AAAA EE 0 oooooo EE 1 KK AAAA EE 0 KK AAAA EE? 0 EE AAAA = KK AAAA EE 0 EE 1 = tt[s] dddd Surface energy approximation (for < 100 nm): ~ dddd iiii dddd dddd Mean energy approximation: ~, dddd ~ dddd iiii dddd EEoo 1 4 EE dddd iiii dddd, dddd EEoo dddd dddd EE1 + 1 4 EE dddd ~ dddd oooooo dddd dddd KKEEoo

How to Interpret RBS Data Pt on Si 200nm Pt Channel number = Backscattering energy Surface is on the right (high energy) greater depths to the left (lower energy) Heavier elements produce higher energy backscattering. Why? Rutherford scattering cross section σσ θθ = qq2 ZZ 1 ZZ 2 4EE 2 sin 4 θθ 2 2 MM 1 MM 2 2 + Heavier elements produce larger peaks per unit concentration. Why? Shape of spectrum. Why?

Depth Profiles E 1 HH NNNN = NN NNNN σσ NNii (EE 0 ) HH SSSS NN SSSS σσ SSii (EE 1 ) NN NNNN (ZZ NNii /EE 0 ) 2 NN SSSS (ZZ SSSS /EE 1 ) 2 σσ θθ = qq2 ZZ 1 ZZ 2 4EE 2 sin 4 θθ 2 2 MM 1 MM 2 2 + HH NNNN HH SSSS = NN NNNN NN SSSS σσ NNii (EE 0 ) σσ SSii (EE 0 ) NN NNNN NN SSSS or better approximation HH NNNN EE NNii HH SSSS EE SSSS = NN NNNN NN SSSS σσ NNii σσ SSii NN NNNN NN SSSS 2

Measuring Concentration & Thickness Comparison of Three WSi x Films with varying W concentrations Comparison of Three Ti Films with varying thickness Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Example of RBS Spectrum Depth O at Surface Si at Surface 2.27 mev He, 160 RBS Si SiO 2 Depth O Si Si in SiO 2 Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Scattering Geometry Affects Depth Resolution Grazing Exit Detector ~100 Incident He ++ Ions Backscattered He Ion Normal Angle Detector Sample Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group ~160

Scattering Geometry Affects Depth Resolution Grazing angle detector improves depth resolution for thin layers Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Effect of Film Density on Thicknesses 26 24 22 20 18 16 2.27 mev He, 160 RBS The total atoms in each film are equal (1.13 x 10 18 atoms/cm 2 ) Both samples produce this spectrum Si Ti density = 5.66 x 10 22 Ti atoms/cm 3 14 12 200 nm 10 8 6 4 Si Ti Si Ti density = 2.83 x 10 22 Ti atoms/cm 3 2 0 0 Channel Number 200 400 400 nm Fundamental unit of measurement for RBS is atoms/cm 2 Density thickness = atoms/cm 2 To calculate a film thickness using RBS alone one must assume a film density If the film thickness is known (by TEM, SEM, profilometry, etc.), then the film density can be calculated

Hydrogen Forward Scattering Spectrometry (HFS) He is heavier than H, so no He backscatters from H (or D) He does forward scatter H at significant energy

RBS/HFS Analysis of Silicon Nitride Film RBS spectrum HFS spectrum Film composition: Si - 38.4% N - 49.1% H - 12.5% Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Channeling Conceptual image of channeling process Ref. Scientific American

Applications of Channeling Quantitative crystal damage profiling Ion Implants Regrowth of damaged crystals Polishing damage Ion etching Epitaxial layers Thickness of amorphous layers Damage detection limit: 1 x 10 15 to 1 x 10 17 displaced at/cm 2 Substitutionality of dopants / impurities

Channeling: Crystal Damage Measurement of damage in crystal structure Disorder in crystal structure results in higher backscattering yield Random MeV He ions Yield Crystal with disorder Aligned Region without disorder Region with disorder 0 0 Perfect crystal Energy

Channeling: Epitaxial Growth Deposited atoms are in perfect registry with the substrate (i.e., epitaxy) shadow cones by the absorbed atoms

Channeling: Substituionality of impurities Yb-implanted Si Yb in not substitutional but is located near the <110> channels

Strengths and Weaknesses Strengths Non destructive depth profiling Quantitative without standards Analysis of whole wafers (150, 200, 300 mm), irregular and large samples Can analyze conductors and insulators Can measure hydrogen Weaknesses Large analysis area (1 mm) Poor sensitivity for low Z elements In many cases, useful information limited to thin films (<0.5 µm) Generally not good for bulk samples