Search Results and Prospects from Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes. Andrew W Smith University of Marland, College Park / NASA GSFC

Similar documents
Indirect dark matter searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array

the CTA Consortium represented by Aldo Morselli

THE PATH TOWARDS THE CHERENKOV TELESCOPE ARRAY OBSERVATORY. Patrizia Caraveo

The Cherenkov Telescope Array. Kevin Meagher Georgia Institute of Technology

The VERITAS Dark M atter and Astroparticle Programs. Benjamin Zitzer For The VERITAS Collaboration

THE PATH TOWARDS THE CHERENKOV TELESCOPE ARRAY OBSERVATORY. Patrizia Caraveo

Very High-Energy Gamma- Ray Astrophysics

The Cherenkov Telescope Array

Emmanuel Moulin! on behalf of the CTA Consortium!!! Rencontres de Moriond 2013! Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe! March 9-16, La Thuile,

CTA as a γ-ray probe for dark matter structures: Searching for the smallest clumps & the largest clusters

The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA)

Indirect searches for dark matter with the Fermi LAT instrument

Searching for dark matter annihilation lines with HESS II. Knut Dundas Morå for the HESS collaboration

Indirect Dark Matter Detection with Dwarf Galaxies

The Cherenkov Telescope Array Project - current status and science goals

Quest for Dark Matter with Cosmic Gamma-ray Observations

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 11 May 2017

Miguel A. Sánchez Conde (Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias)

VERITAS Performance Gernot Maier

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

Cherenkov Telescope Array Status Report. Salvatore Mangano (CIEMAT) On behalf of the CTA consortium

Indirect Detection of Dark Matter with Gamma Rays

Indirect Dark Matter Searches: a Review Eric Charles SLAC National Lab.

Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies. Present status and future prospects

Probing Dark Matter with Cosmic Messengers

CTA SKA Synergies. Stefan Wagner Landessternwarte (CTA Project Office) Heidelberg

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

Recent results in very high energy gamma ray astronomy

AGIS (Advanced Gamma-ray Imaging System)

DARK MATTER ANNIHILATION AT THE GALACTIC CENTER?

Cosmology and fundamental physics with extragalactic TeV γ-rays?

Gamma-Ray Astronomy from the Ground

Second large-scale Monte Carlo study for the Cherenkov Telescope Array

Using the Fermi-LAT to Search for Indirect Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

Recent highlights from VERITAS

Gamma rays from star- forming regions. Jürgen Knödlseder (IRAP, Toulouse) 1

The second phase of the ASTRI project: a mini-array of telescope precursors of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) at its southern site

Dark matter and LHC: complementarities and limitations

Dark Matter - II. Workshop Freudenstadt shedding (Cherenkov) light on dark matter. September 30, 2015

Kathrin Egberts Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg for the H.E.S.S. Collaboration

DM subhalos: The obser vational challenge

Cherenkov Telescope Array ELINA LINDFORS, TUORLA OBSERVATORY ON BEHALF OF CTA CONSORTIUM, TAUP

TeV Galactic Source Physics with CTA

IACT Array Calibration using Cosmic ray Electrons R.D. Parsons, H. Schoorlemmer & J. Hinton

The Future of Very High-Energy Astrophysics. Rene A. Ong (UCLA and ICRR )

Status of the MAGIC telescopes

Andrea Albert (The Ohio State University) on behalf of The Fermi LAT Collaboration. HEP Seminar University of Virginia 12/05/12

Searches for annihilating dark matter in the Milky Way halo with IceCube

Testing a DM explanation of the positron excess with the Inverse Compton scattering

Galactic Novae Simulations for the Cherenkov Telescope Array

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

Cherenkov Telescope Arrays

Calibrating Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes with the LAT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Nov 2011

VERITAS Observations of Starburst Galaxies. The Discovery of VHE Gamma Rays from a Starburst Galaxy

Constraining Galactic dark matter in the Fermi-LAT sky with photon counts statistics

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 9 Sep 2015

SEARCH FOR AXION- LIKE PARTICLE SIGNATURES IN GAMMA-RAY DATA

An AstroParticle perspective for SKA and CTA

Constraints on dark matter annihilation cross section with the Fornax cluster

Masaki Mori. Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo

(Future) Experiments for gamma-ray detection

Future of gamma-ray astronomy: CTA

Structure of Dark Matter Halos

A Monte Carlo simulation study for cosmic-ray chemical composition measurement with Cherenkov Telescope Array

GRB observations at very high energies with the MAGIC telescopes

Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei at very high energies with H.E.S.S.

PoS(ICRC2017)740. Observing the Galactic Plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. CTA consortium represented by Roberta Zanin and Jamie Holder

Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA-US)

CTA / ALMA synergies. C. Boisson. Zech

Cherenkov Telescope Array Status And Outlook. Stefan Schlenstedt Oct 30, 2015

Measurement of a Cosmic-ray Electron Spectrum with VERITAS

Dark matter annihilation and decay factors in the Milky Way s dwarf spheroidal galaxies

PoS(ICRC2017)904. The VERITAS Dark Matter Program. Benjamin Zitzer. for the VERITAS Collaboration Affiliation

VERITAS a Status Report. Nepomuk Otte on behalf of the VERITAS Collaboration

Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Center with Fermi LAT: Challenges

Selecting Interesting Unidentified Sources

Latest Results on Dark Matter and New Physics Searches with Fermi. Simona Murgia, SLAC-KIPAC on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

Indirect Dark Matter Search with MAGIC

The VERITAS Survey of the Cygnus Region of the Galaxy

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 10 Jul 2009

Ruling out thermal dark matter with a black hole induced spiky profile in the M87 galaxy

Update on the Two Smoking Gun" Fermi LAT Searches for Dark Matter- Milky Way Dwarfs and Lines

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 3 Sep 2015

On the scientific motivation for a wide field-of-view TeV gamma-ray observatory in the Southern Hemisphere

VERITAS: Status and Highlights

Prospects for indirect dark matter detection with Fermi and IACTs

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

PROSPECTS FOR CTA OBSERVATIONS OF GAMMA-RAY EMISSION FROM GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND GAMMA- RAY BURSTS

Dark Matter in the Galactic Center

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 22 May 2017

First combined studies on Lorentz Invariance Violation from observations of astrophysical sources

Detectors for astroparticle physics

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 29 Mar 2011

Recent Searches for Dark Matter with the Fermi-LAT

GLAST and beyond GLAST: TeV Astrophysics

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

Transcription:

Search Results and Prospects from Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes Andrew W Smith University of Marland, College Park / NASA GSFC

From P5 report (Cosmic Frontier) Arrenberg et al. Indirect Detection probes a wide range of theory space in DM

In an ideal situation, DM should produce a very recognizable signal in gamma rays

Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Technique: Primary gamma rays initiate EM showers w particle v>c: Cherenkov pulses HESS (Prague WG) Arrenberg et al.

Current TeV Experiments MAGIC-II Canary Islands 2 x 17m HESS-II VERITAS Southern AZ, USA 4x12m Namibia 4x12.5, 1x 28

Rough Performance Values for Current Generation IACTs * Energy range: ~80 GeV to >30 TeV * Energy resolution: 15% at 1 TeV * observation time per year: ~1200 Instrumental PSF hours * point source sensitivity: 1% Crab in <30h, 10% in <30 min = ~600 ɣ/hr (0.1-50 TeV) in footprint of array Current IACTs can detect (5σ) sources producing 6 ɣ/hr in 25 hrs

Indirect Detection of DM w/iacts Assume all the γs you didnt see is this: Constrain this Choose some ppp model to tell you what you should have seen Find an real astronomer to model this for you σv Constraint s= Discrete SUSY parameter scan results. Above curve = disallowed model Mχ

Indirect Detection of DM w/iacts This term is very sensitive to fluctuations in methods What have we learned about this equation? progress? Significant progress σv Constraint s= Discrete SUSY parameter scan results. Above curve = disallowed model Mχ

IACT DM Targets Target Advantages Disadvantages Galactic Center Close by, lots of DM Large γ BG Galactic Substructure Galaxy Clusters Dwarf Galaxies Possibly local, Fermi- LAT sources -Largest DM concentrations in universe -High Mass/Light -No likely γ BG Unknown distance, nature -very distant (weak signal) -very extended -possible γ BG DM distribution can be very uncertain

IACT DM Targets Target Advantages Disadvantages Galactic Center Close by, lots of DM Large γ BG Galactic Substructure Galaxy Clusters Dwarf Galaxies Possibly local, Fermi- LAT sources -Largest DM concentrations in universe -High Mass/Light -No likely γ BG Unknown distance, nature -very distant (weak signal) -very extended -possible γ BG DM distribution can be very uncertain

Galactic Center Peak of DM profile HESS >300 GeV

2011 Abramowski et al. 112 Hours of H.E.S.S. Data

254 Hours of H.E.S.S. data 2015 Le Franc et al (ICRC) HESS II

VERITAS Galactic Center (> 2 TeV) VERITAS 100 hr estimate VERITAS Observations will constrain multi-tev parameter space

Dwarf Spheroidal Searches J ~ (DM density profile) 2 along line of sight Sagittarius NFW Profile, 0.50 integration radius from Drlica-Wagner 2014/ Ackermann et al 2015 and source therein

Dwarf Spheroidal Searches Sagittarius HESS MAGIC VERITAS from Drlica-Wagner 2014/ Ackermann et al 2015 and source therein

Dwarf Spheroidal Searches All 3 IACTs have accrued ~150-200 hrs Sagittarius on dsphs. from Drlica-Wagner 2014/ Ackermann et al 2015 and source therein

MAGIC (165 hrs on Segue I) (Aleksic et al 2015) VERITAS 215 hours on 4 dsphs Zitzer et al 2015) HESS Combined Limits: 140 hours on 5 targets (Abramowski et al 2014)

Aleksic et al 2014 MAGIC (165 hrs on Segue I) (Aleksic et al 2015) VERITAS 215 hours on 4 dsphs Zitzer et al 2015) Likelihood methods improve limits by 2-3 HESS Combined Limits: 140 hours on 5 targets (Abramowski et al 2014)

IACT Dwarf Spheroidal Limits VERITAS HESS χ χ -> τ + τ - MAGIC (Einasto) NFW NATURAL CROSS SECTION

IACT Dwarf Spheroidal Limits HESS dsph VERITAS MAGIC (EInasto) χ χ -> τ + τ - NFW HESS GC NATURAL CROSS SECTION

Limits on χ χ -> ɣ ɣ MAGIC Segue I HESS GC VERITAS dsphs

Where can we go from here? MOU in preparation between IACTs to combine data, joint likelihood methods may improve limits on full data set

Where can we go from here?

CTA Design (S array) Science Optimization under budget constraints Low energies Energy threshold 20-30 GeV 23 m diameter 4 telescopes (LST s) Medium energies 100 GeV 10 TeV 9.5 to 12 m diameter 25 single-mirror telescopes up to 24 dual-mirror telescopes (MST s/scts) High energies 10 km 2 area at few TeV 3 to 4m diameter 70 telescopes (SST s)

Hinton & Funk arxiv:1205.0832 HESS / VERITAS 100 hrs

Hinton & Funk arxiv:1205.0832 HESS / VERITAS 100 hrs

Galactic Plane Survey Fermi bubbles 300 h In the first 3 years of observations, CTA will observe the 300 h 525 h Galactic Plane Survey GC for >500 hours

CTA GC Limits Silverwood, et al., JCAP 03, 055 (2015) Lefranc, et al., PRD 91, 12 (2015) Thermal DM CTA consortium, in preparation CTA will probe deep into natural cross section within 3 years of operation

Summary -Current Generation of IACTs have developed and executed a multi-year DM search program (still in progress) -These programs (significant) have set deep limits, although still mostly separate from the natural cross section. Progress on combining limits. -These programs have paved the way for upcoming searches with CTA, this search will probe deep into the natural cross section within the first few years of operation