Introduction to Aspects of Multiscale Modeling as Applied to Porous Media

Similar documents
Introduction to Aspects of Multiscale Modeling as Applied to Porous Media

Introduction to Aspects of Multiscale Modeling as Applied to Porous Media

MATH 425, FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

Physics 250 Green s functions for ordinary differential equations

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA

CONVERGENCE THEORY. G. ALLAIRE CMAP, Ecole Polytechnique. 1. Maximum principle. 2. Oscillating test function. 3. Two-scale convergence

Math The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution

Lecture 10. (2) Functions of two variables. Partial derivatives. Dan Nichols February 27, 2018

LECTURE # 0 BASIC NOTATIONS AND CONCEPTS IN THE THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDES)

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

Lecture No 1 Introduction to Diffusion equations The heat equat

Chapter 3 Second Order Linear Equations

3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1

Formal Asymptotic Homogenization

100 CHAPTER 4. SYSTEMS AND ADAPTIVE STEP SIZE METHODS APPENDIX

Math 4263 Homework Set 1

Diffusion on the half-line. The Dirichlet problem

TEST CODE: MMA (Objective type) 2015 SYLLABUS

MATH 425, HOMEWORK 3 SOLUTIONS

HARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:

Homogenization and Multiscale Modeling

2.20 Fall 2018 Math Review

MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA

Lagrange Multipliers

Regularity for Poisson Equation

Mixed Multiscale Methods for Heterogeneous Elliptic Problems

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 2: Continuum mechanics

Partial differential equations (ACM30220)

Analysis III (BAUG) Assignment 3 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Sisto Due 13th October 2017

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS. MATH 233 SOME SOLUTIONS TO EXAM 2 Fall 2018

u xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)

Partial Differential Equations

HOMOGENIZATION OF A CONVECTIVE, CONDUCTIVE AND RADIATIVE HEAT TRANSFER PROBLEM

11 a 12 a 21 a 11 a 22 a 12 a 21. (C.11) A = The determinant of a product of two matrices is given by AB = A B 1 1 = (C.13) and similarly.

Lecture 7 - Separable Equations

Leplace s Equations. Analyzing the Analyticity of Analytic Analysis DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING. Engineering Math 16.

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

MATH 131P: PRACTICE FINAL SOLUTIONS DECEMBER 12, 2012

Math 220A - Fall 2002 Homework 5 Solutions

Math 10C - Fall Final Exam

Chapter 2: First Order DE 2.6 Exact DE and Integrating Fa

Math 210, Final Exam, Spring 2012 Problem 1 Solution. (a) Find an equation of the plane passing through the tips of u, v, and w.

RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER

Bessel s Equation. MATH 365 Ordinary Differential Equations. J. Robert Buchanan. Fall Department of Mathematics

First and Second Order ODEs

1. Differential Equations (ODE and PDE)

2015 Math Camp Calculus Exam Solution

MATH 220: Problem Set 3 Solutions

Ordinary Differential Equations II

MATH34032 Mid-term Test 10.00am 10.50am, 26th March 2010 Answer all six question [20% of the total mark for this course]

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

In this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form. 2 u = lots,

Chapter 9: Differential Analysis

TEST CODE: MIII (Objective type) 2010 SYLLABUS

Homework I, Solutions

Nonlinear Diffusion. 1 Introduction: Motivation for non-standard diffusion

Chapter 4 Notes, Calculus I with Precalculus 3e Larson/Edwards

Stochastic homogenization 1

LESSON 25: LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS OCTOBER 30, 2017

Chapter 9: Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 17 May 2017

ACM/CMS 107 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 2017 Assignment 2: PDEs and Finite Element Methods Due: 7th November 2017

Math 46, Applied Math (Spring 2008): Final

Finite Difference Methods for Boundary Value Problems

Waves in a Shock Tube

Math 76 Practice Problems for Midterm II Solutions

Degree Master of Science in Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computing Mathematical Methods I Thursday, 12th January 2012, 9:30 a.m.- 11:30 a.m.

Physics 6303 Lecture 11 September 24, LAST TIME: Cylindrical coordinates, spherical coordinates, and Legendre s equation

Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces

PDEs, Homework #3 Solutions. 1. Use Hölder s inequality to show that the solution of the heat equation

Math Homework 2

2.2 Separable Equations

1. Subspaces A subset M of Hilbert space H is a subspace of it is closed under the operation of forming linear combinations;i.e.,

Functions of Several Variables

MATH 220 solution to homework 5

The Dirichlet boundary problems for second order parabolic operators satisfying a Carleson condition

(z 0 ) = lim. = lim. = f. Similarly along a vertical line, we fix x = x 0 and vary y. Setting z = x 0 + iy, we get. = lim. = i f

SINC PACK, and Separation of Variables

Sobolev Spaces. Chapter 10

Leplace s Equations. Analyzing the Analyticity of Analytic Analysis DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING. Engineering Math EECE

6 Non-homogeneous Heat Problems

The Liapunov Method for Determining Stability (DRAFT)

Lecture 5 : Projections

Linear Algebra. Session 12

Method of Homogenization for the Study of the Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in a Composite Part 2: Homogenization

COMPLETION OF A METRIC SPACE

Simple Examples on Rectangular Domains

Multiscale Computation for Incompressible Flow and Transport Problems

and finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator

MATH 2250 Final Exam Solutions

Math 250B Final Exam Review Session Spring 2015 SOLUTIONS

S chauder Theory. x 2. = log( x 1 + x 2 ) + 1 ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. ( 5) x 1 + x 2 x 1 + x 2. 2 = 2 x 1. x 1 x 2. 1 x 1.

Multivariable Calculus

Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations Numerical Solution of Elliptic Boundary Value

Exercises - Chapter 1 - Chapter 2 (Correction)

Getting started: CFD notation

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ap] 3 Oct 2006

y 2y = 4 x, Name Form Solution method

THE STOKES SYSTEM R.E. SHOWALTER

Transcription:

Introduction to Aspects of Multiscale Modeling as Applied to Porous Media Part III Todd Arbogast Department of Mathematics and Center for Subsurface Modeling, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences (ICES) The University of Texas at Austin

Mathematical Homogenization

Periodicity The solution u has high frequency wiggles due to the heterogeneity of k. u(x) ū(x) x We want the average behavior! Can we find ū(x) without knowing u(x)? The wiggles are irregular, so they are hard to deal with. Idea : Assume that the heterogeneity is periodic, so that the wiggles are regular, and thus easily identified. This is basically our closure assumption. Idea : Let the period of oscillation be ǫ, and let ǫ. This should remove the wiggles.

Convergence of Wiggles Example: Let u ǫ (x) = sin(x/ǫ). As ǫ, sin(x/ǫ) does not converge, it just oscillates more and more between - and. But it becomes a blur, so is it not? (At least in some sense?)

Test Functions Idea 3: Consider a weaker form of convergence. Theorem: If then f = g. f(x) φ(x) dx = g(x) φ(x) dx φ C φ(x) We test f by multiplying by φ and integrating. If we know all such tests, we know f. f(x)

Convergence of Wiggles Let φ(x) C and consider uǫ (x) φ(x) dx = sin(x/ǫ) φ(x) dx = ǫcos(x/ǫ) φ (x) dx We call this weak convergence, and write u ǫ. 4 4.5.5 6..4.6.8.9.9.94.96.98.

Definition: If lim ǫ u ǫ (x) φ(x) dx = Weak Convergence u(x) φ(x) dx φ C then u ǫ converges weakly to u. We write u ǫ u. Definition: The L -norm of a function u is u { u(x) dx } / Theorem: If there is C > independent of ǫ such that u ǫ C < then there exists u such that u ǫ u.

Obtaining Periodic Wiggles Suppose that the domain Ω has a periodic structure with period ǫy. As ǫ, we obtain our macro-scale model for the average flow. Y Question: How do we proceed? Homogenization is very mathematical, and involves deep analysis and partial differential equations. Fortunately there is a simpler, more physical way to view homogenization.

Formal Homogenization Scaling: We assume that the space variable has both a slow (x) and fast (y) component. x x + ǫy At any point x, y allows us to see the local details, which disappear as ǫ. x x + ǫy y Y Ω Formal assumption: We assume without proof that we can expand the true solution p(x) into a power series involving ǫ: p(x) p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + wherein y = x/ǫ and each p k is periodic in y. Gradient scaling: Then x + ǫ y

Homogenization of Darcy Flow Recall the model of Darcy flow (ignore outer BCs): (k ǫ p ǫ ) = f in Ω Make the closure assumption that k ǫ (x) = k(x, x/ǫ), where k(x, y) is periodic of period in y, so k ǫ (x) has periodic oscillations of period ǫ. Note that k ǫ (x) can vary slowly over the domain with only the local variability being periodic. Formal expansion: Substitute p ǫ (x) = p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + and = x + ǫ y to find (ǫ y + x ) [k(x, y)(ǫ y + x ) ( p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + )] = f in Ω Y

We rewrite our expansion Homogenization of Darcy Flow (ǫ y + x ) [k(x, y)(ǫ y + x ) ( p (x, y) as a power series in ǫ ǫ { y [ k(x, y) y p (x, y) ]} + ǫ p (x, y) + ǫ p (x, y) + )] = f in Ω Y + ǫ { y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] x [ k(x, y) y p (x, y) ]} + ǫ { y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] + = f in Ω Y x [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )]} This should hold for all ǫ as ǫ, so it must hold for each term.

Step, ǫ -terms: Homogenization of Darcy Flow 3 y [k(x, y) y p (x, y) ] = in Ω Y p (x, y) is periodic in y Note that there are no derivatives in x, so x is just a parameter. We have a partial differential equation (PDE) in y only. It is not particularly difficult to see that p (x, y) must be constant in y. Conclusion: p = p (x) only. Question: Why is this result important? That is, why should the leading order of the solution not depend on y?

Step, ǫ -terms: Homogenization of Darcy Flow 4 y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] From Step, one term vanishes. Thus x [k(x, y) y p (x, y) ] in Ω Y y [ k(x, y) y p (x, y) ] = y [k(x, y) p (x) ] in Ω Y p (x, y) is periodic in y Again x is basically a parameter, and this is a PDE in y for p (x, y), if we are given x p (x). But x p (x) is a constant vector in y! Trick: Use the linearity! Since p = j e j j p, replace p by e j and solve.

Homogenization of Darcy Flow 5 We solve (for each fixed x of interest) y [ k(x, y) y ω j (x, y) ] = y [ k(x, y)e j ] ω j (x, y) is periodic in y Then, multiplying by j p and summing, j j p (x) y [ k(x, y) y ω j (x, y) ] = j in Ω Y j p (x) y [ k(x, y)e j ] Linearity and constancy in y of j p allow us to move things inside y [ k(x, y) y ω j (x, y) j p (x) ] = y [ k(x, y) p (x) ] Conclusion: j p (x, y) = j ω j (x, y) j p (x) solves our problem y [ k(x, y) y p (x, y) ] = y [k(x, y) p (x) ] in Ω Y p (x, y) is periodic in y

Homogenization of Darcy Flow 6 Step 3 (Final Step), ǫ -terms: y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] x [k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + p (x) )] = f in Ω Y Trick: Remove y by averaging (integrate over y and divide by the volume of Y, Y ). For the first piece, we get Y Y y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] dy = Y due to periodicity! Y [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + x p (x, y) )] ν ds(y) = Easily, the third piece is Y Y f(x) dy = f(x)

Note that Homogenization of Darcy Flow 8 p (x, y) = j ω j (x, y) j p (x) tells us that we know p if we know p. Thus the second piece is Y Y x [ k(x, y) ( y p (x, y) + p (x) )] dy = Y k(x, Y y)( y ω j (x, y) j p (x) + p (x) ) dy = i = i = i i Y j j i ( Y j k(x, Y y)( y i ω j(x, y) j p (x) + j j Y k(x, y)( y i ω j(x, y) + δ ij i (ˆk ij j p (x) ) = (ˆk p ). ) dy ) j p (x) δ ij j p (x) ) dy We have derived our homogenized coefficient ˆk from k. It is a tensor! Conclusion: Collecting pieces, we have our desired result: (ˆk p ) = f in Ω

Homogenization of Darcy Flow 9 Summary: Starting from (k ) ǫ p ǫ = f in Ω we found that, as ǫ, p ǫ p, where (ˆk p ) = f in Ω and ˆk(x) can be computed as the tensor ˆk ij (x) = Y k(x, Y y)( y i ω ) j(x, y) + δ ij dy and ω j (x, y) can be computed from the local cell problems: y [ k(x, y) y ω j (x, y) ] = y [ k(x, y)e j ] ω j (x, y) is periodic in y in Ω Y

The Homogenized Permeability Lemma: ˆk is symmetric and positive definite: ξ ˆkξ = i,j ξ iˆk ij ξ j > for all vectors ξ. Thus, ˆk has three principle eigenvectors and only positive eigenvalues. Question: Why is this important? Lemma (Voigt-Reiss Inequality): ˆk lies between the harmonic and arithmetic averages. More precisely, if ( ) k h = Y (k(x, Y y)) dy and k a = k(x, y) dy Y Y then ξ k h ξ ξ ˆkξ ξ k a ξ

Convergence Theorem: As ǫ, we have weak convergence p ǫ p In fact, p ǫ p and p ǫ p Cǫ Moreover, if p ǫ = p + ǫ j ω j (x, x/ǫ) j p (x), then (p ǫ p ǫ) C ǫ

Computational Upscaling via Homogenization In our small -D problem, we obtain the following. Log-permeability and xx and yy local averages (xy = yx set to ):.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 8 6 4 4 6 8 8 6 4 4 6 8 Computed pressure: 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 8 8 homogenized avg 8 8 computed average Relative errors: Harmonic.4, Homog..36, Computational.8.