Introduction. X-Ray Production and Quality. Fluorescence Yield. Fluorescence X-Rays. Initiating event. Initiating event 3/18/2011

Similar documents
CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Outline. Absorbed Dose in Radioactive Media. Introduction. Radiation equilibrium. Charged-particle equilibrium

Basic physics Questions

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

In today s lecture, we want to see what happens when we hit the target.

Chapter V: Cavity theories

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Chapter Four (Interaction of Radiation with Matter)

Shell Atomic Model and Energy Levels

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Non-radioactive radiation sources. Lesson FYSKJM4710 Eirik Malinen

Interaction of Particles with Matter

Atomic Structure and Processes

Interactions with Matter Photons, Electrons and Neutrons

For the next several lectures, we will be looking at specific photon interactions with matter. In today s lecture, we begin with the photoelectric

Physics of Radiography

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Photon Interactions in Matter

Accelerators and radiation spectra

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

Interaction theory Photons. Eirik Malinen

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

Charged-Particle Interactions in Matter

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 3

Ba (Z = 56) W (Z = 74) preferred target Mo (Z = 42) Pb (Z = 82) Pd (Z = 64)

Physics of Radiography

Atomic Physics. Chapter 6 X ray. Jinniu Hu 24/12/ /20/13

X-ray Interaction with Matter

Physics of Particle Beams. Hsiao-Ming Lu, Ph.D., Jay Flanz, Ph.D., Harald Paganetti, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

PHYS 3650L - Modern Physics Laboratory

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

The next three lectures will address interactions of charged particles with matter. In today s lecture, we will talk about energy transfer through

Rad T 290 Worksheet 2

X-ray Spectroscopy. Danny Bennett and Maeve Madigan. October 12, 2015

LECTURE 6: INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL PHYSICS 1 Quiz #1 Solutions October 6, 2017

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

Spectral Filtering for Improving Quality of Material Discrimination Using Dual Energy X-rays

Interaction of charged particles and photons with matter

Characterization of Low-Energy (6-30 kev) Response of Polish TLDs (MTS-N, MCP-N) with Synchrotron Radiation and Determination of Some TLD Quantities.

CHAPTER 2 RADIATION INTERACTIONS WITH MATTER HDR 112 RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RADIATION PROTECTION MR KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

The interaction of radiation with matter

CHAPTER 4 RADIATION ATTENUATION

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

The Bohr Model of Hydrogen

X-RAY PRODUCTION. Prepared by:- EN KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

Week 7: Ch. 10 Spec. w/ Scintillation Ctrs. Photomultiplier Devices

Interaction of Radiation with Matter

1240 ev nm nm. f < f 0 (5)

Radiation Quantities and Units

Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. X-ray Interaction (Part I) Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. section

X-Ray Emission and Absorption

Chapter NP-4. Nuclear Physics. Particle Behavior/ Gamma Interactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 IONIZATION

University of Oslo. Department of Physics. Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 2 Charged-Particles.

CHAPTER 2 INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Friday

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Passage of particles through matter

This is the third of three lectures on cavity theory.

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

Motivation. g-spectroscopy deals with g-ray detection and is one of the most relevant methods to investigate excited states in nuclei.

Week 2: Chap. 2 Interaction of Radiation

Production of X-rays. Radiation Safety Training for Analytical X-Ray Devices Module 9

Characterization of low energy ionization signals from Compton scattering in a CCD Dark Matter detector

LET! (de / dx) 1 Gy= 1 J/kG 1Gy=100 rad. m(kg) dose rate

Chapter 2 Methods Based on the Absorption of Gamma-Ray Beams by Matter

Photon transport mode in Serpent 2

Interactions of Radiation with Matter

Advanced Lab Course. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BASICS 1 3 EXPERIMENT Qualitative analysis Chemical Shifts 7

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 21 (11/29/06) Detection of Nuclear Radiation: Pulse Height Spectra

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Interaction X-rays - Matter

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

Detection and measurement of gamma-radiation by gammaspectroscopy

Generation of X-Rays in the SEM specimen

Electron Spectroscopy

MEDICINSK STRÅLNINGSFYSIK

Chapter 2: Interactions of Radiation with Matter

Radiation and the Atom

DR KAZI SAZZAD MANIR

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Quantitative Assessment of Scattering Contributions in MeV-Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography

Chapter 38. Photons Light Waves Behaving as Particles

ARTICLE. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology Volume 4 (2014) pp Yoshiko Harima a*, Naohiro Kurosawa b and Yukio Sakamoto c

Chapiter VII: Ionization chamber

4. Inelastic Scattering

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Radiation Dosimetry. Electron interactions with matter. Important processes in radiotherapy. Contents. Alun Beddoe

THE NATURE OF THE ATOM. alpha particle source

Transcription:

X-Ray Production and Quality Chapter 9 F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Introduction Physics of x-ray generation Fluorescence x-rays Bremsstrahlung x-rays Beam quality description Hardness or penetrating ability Energy spectral distribution Biological effectiveness Fluorescence X-Rays Produced when an inner shell electron in an atom is removed as a result of Electron capture or internal conversion Photoelectric effect Hard collision with charged particle The minimum energy required to ionize the inner shell electron is E b L K hn Fluorescence Yield The probability that a fluorescence x-ray will escape the atom fluorescence yield Y K, Y L Y K = for Z<1 (Ne) Y L = for Z<9 (Cu) Y M ~ for all Z Initiating event The minimum energy supplied has to be > E b When electrons are used to produce fluorescence, they appear against a very strong background of continuous bremsstrahlung spectrum To obtain a relatively pure fluorescence x-ray source have to use either heavy charged particles or x-rays (photoelectric effect) Both methods are used for trace-element fluorescence analysis Initiating event When heavy charged particles are used the minimum energy required for K-shell ionization is: T max 4M mt M m This estimate for a proton source results in energy ~46 x E b Largely overestimates the required energy due to strong electron binding effectively increasing its mass E b K 1

K-Fluorescence Photon Energy Secondary event: an electron from higher level fills out the K-shell vacancy (not all transitions are allowed by quantum mech. selection rules) A fluorescence photon with the energy equal to the difference between the two energy levels may be emitted X-ray fluorescence has a very narrow energy line; often used for calibration of spectrometers No angular correlation to the direction of the incident particle K-Fluorescence Photon Energy Quantum mechanics selection rules (angular momentum conservation) allow transitions mainly from the levels shown in boxes K-Fluorescence Photon Energy Angular distribution Fluorescence: emitted isotropically with respect to both energy and intensity Bremsstrahlung: emitted anisotropically, more forwardly directed, especially with increasing energy Generally true irrespective of Z,T, or target thickness With typical spectroscopic resolution can observe two doublets separated by 1 kev Angular distribution Fluorescence yield vs. electron beam energy and Z No fluorescence production if T<(E b ) K For T>(E b ) K all lines are generated with fixed relative strengths The efficiency of fluorescence production reaches maximum then decreases with T Depending on Z of the material can get more or less pure fluorescence beam with bremsstrahlung photons intermixing

Fluorescence yield vs. electron beam energy and Z Fluorescence yield vs. electron beam energy Method c produces the purest fluorescence beam Bremsstrahlung production efficiency Thin target: the beam energy and stopping power is not changed; little energy is deposited Thick target: electron spends most of its energy or is completely stopped Bremsstrahlung production yield for thin target: r dt dx dt dx dt dxr TZ dt dx dt dx n TZ n depends on energy and material c r Bremsstrahlung production efficiency High-Z targets convert a larger fraction of electron s energy into bremsstrahlung Most of the energy is spent in collision interactions, resulting in target heating Tungsten is a common choice for target due to high Z and high melting point Production efficiency depends on energy: At 1 kev 1% goes into bremsstrahlung At 1 GeV 99% goes into bremsstrahlung Bremsstrahlung production efficiency T << m c Thin target Maximum photon energy hv max =T Duane and Hunt s law Thick target 3

for thin target If assume hv 1/ b Nhv const Thick target can be considered as a stack of thin targets, adequate in aggregate depth to stop the electron beam; the electrons lose their kinetic energy gradually by many small collision interactions The foils in the stack are assumed to become progressively thinner with increasing depth, so that each one reduces the beam energy by the same amount The collision stopping power increases as 1/T for decreasing energy Radiative losses are negligible as a mechanism for reducing the beam energy for T «m c Amount of radiant energy generated in a thick target can be crudely estimated by: R 11 3 N ZT MeV Comparison with radiation yield in Appendix E, where Y(T )=R/T N e shows agreement within 3% with tabulated values e Thick target The array of rectangular areas (representing the x-ray outputs of all the imaginary individual foils comprising the thick target) can be fitted by a triangular envelope called the Kramers spectrum, having the formula hv CN Zhv hv R e Here R is the Differential radiant-energy spectral distribution of bremsstrah lung generated in the thick target of atomic number Z The area under triangle represents the total radiant energy of the unfiltered bremsstrahlung max The area under triangle represents the total radiant energy of the unfiltered bremsstrahlung C R NeZ hv N ZT max C Comparing with analytical expression for R, find that C/=1x1-3. In Joules: e R 1.61 16 N ZT e J Can observe graphic effect of changing the parameters 4

For T >> m c ( relativistic electrons) have to use more general Bethe-Heitler formula for radiative stopping power Resulting photon output spectrum can be expressed through differential cross-section d r B r d hv hv Here B r is gradually decreasing dimensionless function (tabulated) T >> m c There is less difference between thin and thick target spectra Bremsstrahlung directional dependence The x rays tend to be emitted with an appreciable sideways component for lowenergy electron beams, however, are more strongly forward as T is increased Bremsstrahlung directional dependence The forward peaking at high energies necessitates the use of a conical beam-flattening filter in linac x-ray beams for radiotherapy applications, even though the phenomenon becomes less pronounced for thicker targets Such a filter attenuates the beam less strongly as a function of distance away from its central axis, thus producing a beam of more uniform intensity over a useful area. Exact alignment of such a filter is critical Unfiltered x-ray beam contains both fluorescence (characteristic of the target) and bremsstrahlung x- rays The principle result of adding filter is the removal photons at energies where attenuation coefficient is largest (since the photoelectric interaction coefficient varies approximately as 1/(hv) 3 in this energy range) Can narrow the spectral distribution progressively; beam is hardened by filtration T < 3 kev 5

The most common x-ray filtering media are lead, tin, copper, and aluminum, which may be used singly or in combination. The advantage of combination filters is that they are generally capable of narrowing the spectrum to any desired degree while preserving more of the x-ray output than can be achieved with a single filtering material. The higher-z filters provide strong filtering action but cause discontinuities at the shell binding energies. The lower-z filters tend to smooth the resulting spectrum It is important in using combination filters that they be positioned in the beam in descending order of Z, going in the direction of the rays This allows each filter to remove the fluorescence x rays that originate in the higher-z filter upstream from it Aluminum (hv K = 1.5 kev) is best for the final filter. Copper (hv K = 9 kev) fluorescence also is low enough in energy not to be detectable in most cases. However, neither tin (hv K = 9 kev) nor lead (hv K = 85 KeV) should be used without sufficient following filtration to remove the fluorescence, unless those photons are desired as part of the output At higher energies (T > 3 kev) the photoelectric effect becomes less important than the Compton effect, and the total coefficient is less energy-dependent The filtering of an x-ray spectrum generated by megavolt electrons mainly removes the photons below a few hundred kev without greatly modifying the spectral shape at higher energies The use of a thick high-z filter such as lead on a multimegavolt x-ray beam tends to filter out the highest-energy photons (>4 MeV) through pair production, as well as the lowest through the photoelectric effect X-ray beam quality The quality of an x-ray beam can be specified in terms of either its spectrum or its attenuation characteristics in a reference medium Spectra can be either (a) estimated from theoretical considerations (including the effect of filtration), or (b) derived by Laplace transformation from a measured narrow-beam attenuation curve, or (c) measured directly by some type of spectrometer X-ray beam quality X-ray beam quality 6

X-ray beam quality and beam quality Attenuation curves and HVLs It is possible (with some limitations) to derive an x-ray spectrum from the shape of an attenuation curve, which is a "signature" for the related spectrum in a given medium Thus attenuation data can be used to characterize x-ray beams Attenuation curves and HVLs To standardize such data the following conventions are generally followed: Pure aluminum or copper is used as the attenuating medium, Al being preferred for T < 1 kev and Cu for higher energies <.5 MeV Narrow-beam geometry is required (i.e., scattered rays from the attenuator must not reach the detector The detector (e.g., ion chamber) must be air-equivalent, that is, must give a constant response per unit of exposure, independent of photon energy Attenuation curves and HVLs Half-value layers - Monoenergetic beam The attenuation curves, can be reasonably well specified for radiological applications in terms of their first and second half-value layers, HVL 1, and HVL HVL 1, is defined as the thickness required to reduce the exposure by half, in narrow-beam geometry; HVL is the thickness necessary to reduce it by half again under the same conditions Homogeneity coefficient (HC), defined as the ratio HVL 1 /HVL. This approaches unity as the spectrum is narrowed by filtration to approach monochromaticity, in which case attenuation is exponential 7

Half-value layers Half-value layers Another quantity that is sometimes used in beamquality specification is the equivalent photon energy, hv eq, defined as the quantum energy of a monoenergetic beam having the same HVL 1, as the beam being specified The equivalent photon energy gives no more information than HVL 1, but gives it in a form that is especially useful in describing heavily filtered beams approaching monochromaticity Half-value layers Attenuation curves Value of hv eq corresponding to (m/) eq can be obtained from Appendix D3 Depth of Dmax increases with energy as the range of secondary electrons increases Summary Physics of x-ray generation Fluorescence x-rays Bremsstrahlung x-rays Beam quality description Energy spectral distribution Attenuation curves and half-value layers 8