Future Gravitational Wave Observations

Similar documents
GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

LIGO Detection of Gravitational Waves. Dr. Stephen Ng

Searching for Gravitational Waves from Coalescing Binary Systems

Cosmology with Gravitational Wave Detectors. Maya Fishbach

Searching for gravitational waves. with LIGO detectors

GRB-triggered searches for gravitational waves from compact binary inspirals in LIGO and Virgo data during S5/VSR1

Searches for Gravitational waves associated with Gamma-ray bursts

GW150914: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger

Synergy with Gravitational Waves

NEVER IGNORE A COINCIDENCE

Multimessenger Probes of Neutron Star Physics. David Tsang (U. Southampton)

Four ways of doing cosmography with gravitational waves

Time-domain astronomy with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor

GRAVITATIONAL WAVES. Eanna E. Flanagan Cornell University. Presentation to CAA, 30 April 2003 [Some slides provided by Kip Thorne]

GR SIMULATIONS OF COMPACT BINARY MERGERS. Bruno Giacomazzo JILA, University of Colorado, USA

GR SIMULATIONS OF BINARY NEUTRON STARS AND BINARY BLACK HOLES WITH WHISKY. Bruno Giacomazzo University of Trento, Italy

Event Rates of Gravitational Waves from merging Intermediatemass

The direct detection of gravitational waves: The first discovery, and what the future might bring

GRAVITATIONAL WAVE ASTRONOMY

14/11/2018. L Aquila - Multi-messenger studies of NS mergers, GRBs and magnetars. Simone Dall Osso

M.Alessandra Papa. Max Planck Inst. f. Gravitationsphysik and Univ. of Wisconsin- Milwaukee. ICGC Conference 2007, December Pune

Gravitational Wave Astronomy using 0.1Hz space laser interferometer. Takashi Nakamura GWDAW-8 Milwaukee 2003/12/17 1

MIDTERM #2. ASTR 101 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies. Can we detect BLACK HOLES? Black Holes in Binaries to the rescue. Black spot in the sky?

Ref. PRL 107, (2011)

DECAM SEARCHES FOR OPTICAL SIGNATURES OF GW Soares-Santos et al arxiv:

Short GRB and kilonova: did observations meet our theoretical predictions?

The origin of the coalescing compact object binaries

GW Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

Electromagne,c Counterparts of Gravita,onal Wave Events

Gravitational Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts Tsvi Piran Λ The Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Lecture given at the C

High-energy follow-up studies of gravitational wave transient events

LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans. Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04

Observe a ToO following an alert from gravitational wave observatories

The Advanced LIGO detectors at the beginning of the new gravitational wave era

GENERAL RELATIVISTIC SIMULATIONS OF NS BINARIES. Bruno Giacomazzo University of Trento and INFN-TIFPA, Italy

1 Searching for Optical counterparts of Gravitational

Searching for Intermediate Mass Black Holes mergers

Search for Gravitational Wave Transients. Florent Robinet On behalf of the LSC and Virgo Collaborations

LIGO Observational Results

Brian Metzger Princeton University NASA Einstein Fellow

LISA: Probing the Universe with Gravitational Waves. Tom Prince Caltech/JPL. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna LISA

Astrophysics to z~10 with Gravitational Waves

Astrophysical Rates of Gravitational-Wave Compact Binary Sources in O3

The rate of short Gamma Ray Bursts and NS 2 mergers

GW from GRBs Gravitational Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET

Searching for gravitational waves

GRMHD simulations of remnant accretion disks from neutron star mergers

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 10 Mar 2018

Gravitational Waves. Masaru Shibata U. Tokyo

Confronting Theory with Gravitational Wave Observations

Short gamma-ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers: the time-reversal scenario

What have we learned from the detection of gravitational waves? Hyung Mok Lee Seoul National University

Testing relativity with gravitational waves

MHD simulation for merger of binary neutron stars in numerical relativity

The Present Gravitational Wave Detection Effort

Exploring the Warped Side of the Universe

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

Search for X-ray Transients with MAXI

Implications of GW observations for short GRBs

Massive Stellar Black Hole Binaries and Gravitational Waves

Fulvio Ricci Università di Roma La Sapienza INFN Roma on behalf of the design study team

MAGIC electromagne1c follow- up of Gravita1onal Wave alerts IAU- BlackHoles2016, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 15th 2016

Eric Howell University of Western Australia

Overview of Gravitational Wave Observations by LIGO and Virgo

Gravitational waves searches by the network of ground-based interferometers

EINSTEIN TELESCOPE rd. 3 generation GW detector

Gravitational waves from the merger of two black holes

GRMHD SIMULATIONS OF NS-NS MERGERS. Bruno Giacomazzo University of Trento and INFN-TIFPA, Italy

Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis

Current Experimental Limits on Gravitational Waves. Nelson Christensen Artemis, Observatoire de la Côte d Azur, Nice

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO)! A Brief Overview!

The Stellar Graveyard

Dual and Binary MBHs and AGN: Connecting Dynamics and Accretion

ASTR 101 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies. NEXT Tuesday 4/4 MIDTERM #2

Sources of Gravitational Waves

The Stellar Graveyard

What have we learned from coalescing Black Hole binary GW150914

Lobster X-ray Telescope Science. Julian Osborne

Short Gamma-ray Bursts: Lessons Learned, Open Questions, and Constraints for the GW Era

Prospects of continuous gravitational waves searches from Fermi-LAT sources

Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data

Gamma Ray Bursts. Progress & Prospects. Resmi Lekshmi. Indian Institute of Space Science & Technology Trivandrum

Gravitational waves. Markus Pössel. What they are, how to detect them, and what they re good for. MPIA, March 11, 2016.

Past and Future in the Quest for Gravitational Wave Transients

Synergy of GWs and EM signals

Probing the Creation of the Heavy Elements in Neutron Star Mergers

Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis: Lecture 3

Requirements for a 3G GW observatory

Gravity Waves and Black Holes

Gravitational waves from binary neutron stars

Outline. 1. Basics of gravitational wave transient signal searches. 2. Reconstruction of signal properties

Cherenkov Telescope Array ELINA LINDFORS, TUORLA OBSERVATORY ON BEHALF OF CTA CONSORTIUM, TAUP

How beaming of gravitational waves compares to the beaming of electromagnetic waves: impacts to gravitational wave detection

Fermi GBM transient searches with ADWO

Gravitational Wave Astronomy

Gravitational Waves and LIGO

The Remarkable Story of LIGO s Detection of Gravitational Waves

Dynamics of star clusters containing stellar mass black holes: 1. Introduction to Gravitational Waves

Gravitational Wave Burst Searches

Transcription:

Future Gravitational Wave Observations Stephen Fairhurst GW170817: The First Double Neutron Star Merger KITP, December 7, 2017 1

Sensitivity Evolution Advanced IGO Advanced Virgo Early (2015 16, 40 80 ) Early (2017, 20 65 ) Mid (2016 17, 80 120 ) Mid (2018 19, 65 85 ) Strain noise amplitude/hz 1/2 10 21 10 22 10 23 ate (2018 19, 120 170 ) Design (2020, 190 ) BNS-optimized (210 ) Strain noise amplitude/hz 1/2 10 21 10 22 10 23 ate (2020 21, 65 115 ) Design (2021, 125 ) BNS-optimized (140 ) 10 24 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency/Hz 10 24 10 1 10 2 10 3 KAGRA Frequency/Hz Opening (2018 19, 3 8 ) Early (2019 20, 8 25 ) Strain noise amplitude/hz 1/2 10 21 10 22 10 23 Mid (2020 21, 25 40 ) ate (2021 22, 40 140 ) Design (2022, 140 ) From Abbott et al, arxiv:1304.0670v4 10 24 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency/Hz 2

Sensitivity Evolution Early Mid ate Design 60-80 60-100 120-170 190 IGO O1 O2 O3 25-30 65-85 65-115 125 Virgo O2 O3 25-40 40-140 140 KAGRA 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 From Abbott et al, arxiv:1304.0670v4 3

Observing scenario Epoch 2015 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020+ 2024+ Planned run duration 4 months 9 months 12 months (per year) (per year) IGO 40 60 60 75 75 90 105 105 Expected burst range/ Virgo 20 40 40 50 40 70 80 KAGRA 100 IGO 40 80 80 120 120 170 190 190 Expected BNS range/ Virgo 20 65 65 85 65 115 125 KAGRA 140 IGO 60 80 60 100 Achieved BNS range/ Virgo 25 30 KAGRA Estimated BNS detections 0.002 2 0.007 30 0.04 100 0.1 200 0.4 400 Actual BNS detections 0 5 deg % within < 1 1 5 1 4 3 7 23 30 90% CR 20 deg 2 < 1 7 14 12 21 14 22 65 73 median/deg 2 460 530 230 320 120 180 110 180 9 12 Searched area % within 5 deg 2 4 6 15 21 20 26 23 29 62 67 20 deg 2 14 17 33 41 42 50 44 52 87 90 From Abbott et al, arxiv:1304.0670v4 4

ur analyses identified GW170817 as the only BNSs signal detected in O2 with a false alarm rate below 00 yr. Using a method derived from [27,178,179], and ming that the mass distribution of the components of Updated Expectations and their S systems is flat between 1 and 2 M ensionless spins are below 0.4, we are able to infer local coalescence rate density R of BNS systems. rporating Use the IGO-Virgo upper limit ofbns 12600rate Gpc 3 yr 1 from O1 a prior, R ¼ 1540 þ3200 1220 Gpc 3 yr 1. Our findings are min of 1 10 47 erg s 1, and a = 1, b = 2 and g = { 1, 0.5, 0}in Equation (21), respectively. The purple solid line refers to the base model with O3 Design min of 5 10 49 erg s 1. The four curves are normalized by imposing 40 triggered SGRB per year. As g increases, the observed rate is no longer volumetric at lower and lower redshifts, because a fraction of SGRBs becomes too dim to be detected. For reference, the red, blue and green dot-dashed curves show the local SGRB occurrence rate for min = 1 1047 erg s 1 3200 and g = { 1, 0.5, 0}, respectively. The black line and gray band show the BNS merger rate 1540 1220 Gpc 3yr 1 - + - - determined with the detection of GW170817 (Abbott et al. 2017e). For comparison, the measured SGRBs redshift distribution from Table 2 is shown in cyan, and is broadly compatible with all of the models. The dotted vertical cyan line refers to the redshift of GRB 170817A host galaxy. Extend GRB luminosity distribution down as = 5 10 49 erg s 1 : iso -g -a iso < -a iso f o( iso) = iso iso -b < < iso > { } Fit GRB rate to 40 per year observed in Fermi GBM, 161101-7 reduced interferometer response a their observation unfeasible. Con been made for short (tens of ms) a ( 500 s) gravitational-wave sign remnant at frequencies up to 4 kh latter, the data examined start at th and extend to the end of the obse 2017. With the time scales and m [193], there is no evidence of From Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger : 5

Observing scenario Epoch 2015 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020+ 2024+ Planned run duration 4 months 9 months 12 months (per year) (per year) IGO 40 60 60 75 75 90 105 105 Expected burst range/ Virgo 20 40 40 50 40 70 80 KAGRA 100 IGO 40 80 80 120 120 170 190 190 Expected BNS range/ Virgo 20 65 65 85 65 115 125 KAGRA 140 IGO 60 80 60 100 Achieved BNS range/ Virgo 25 30 KAGRA Estimated BNS detections 0.002 2 0.007 30 0.04 1-50 100 0.1 6-120 200 0.4 400 Actual BNS detections 0 1 5 deg % within < 1 1 5 1 4 3 7 23 30 90% CR 20 deg 2 < 1 7 14 12 21 14 22 65 73 median/deg 2 460 530 230 320 120 180 110 180 9 12 Searched area % within 5 deg 2 4 6 15 21 20 26 23 29 62 67 20 deg 2 14 17 33 41 42 50 44 52 87 90 Estimated GW-GRB 0.1-1.4 0.3-1.7 Actual GW-GRB 1 - - From Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger 6

Expected O3 Observations Signal to noise ratio GW170817 Distance and Orientation Relative Sensitivity Rate density 7

Measuring Inclination Face-on signals are left/right circularly polarized To bound inclination, need to observe difference from circular polarization Require good sensitivity to both GW polarizations 8

Measuring Inclination Face-on signals are left/right circularly polarized Volume weighted sensitivity To bound inclination, need to observe difference from circular polarization Require good sensitivity to both GW polarizations Relative sensitivity to 2nd polarization 9

GW only observations Will measure chirp mass m1 M well, not component masses (Hannam+, 2013) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 χ NS 0 χ 0.05 χ NS 0.05 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Hannam et al. 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 m 2 M Figure Will 1. increasingly move 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 m 2 M towards population based statements on masses, spins, equation of state m1 p (m1) 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 1 10 2 m 1 (M ) FIG. 8. The posterior probability distribution for the primary component mass m 1 of binary black holes inferred from the hierarchical analysis. The black line gives the posterior median as a function of mass, and the dark and light grey bands give the 50% and 90% credible intervals. The colored vertical bands give the 50% credible interval from the posterior on m 1 from the analyses of (left to right) GW151226, VT151012, GW170104, and GW150914. The marginal mass distribution is a power law for m 1 apple 50 M, and turns over for m 1 50 M due to the constraint on the two-dimensional population distribution that m 1 + m 2 apple 100 M. GW170104 supplemental material 10

GRB only observations Dedicated search [ 5, +1) s from time of short GRBs With no detection, place exclusion Exclusion confidence at 54 Example: GRB150906B 90% exclusion distance (max 30 o opening) From Abbott et al, arxiv:1611.07947 11

GRB only observation Population exclusion from O1 With future observations, begin to restrict fraction of nearby GRBs Abbott et al. From Abbott et al, arxiv:1611.07947 12

Discussion Expect binary neutron star merger observations in upcoming IGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing runs Majority of sources expected to be weaker and at greater distance than GW170817 Joint, GW only and EM only observations allow us to probe NS properties, GRBs and kilonovae. 13

Science Case Team Chairs: Kalogera, Sathayprakash Register https://gw-astronomy.org/ registry/pages/public/gwic-3gsct-wg-sign-up 14