Evolution of cooperation. Martin Nowak, Harvard University

Similar documents
Understanding and Solving Societal Problems with Modeling and Simulation

Tit-for-Tat or Win-Stay, Lose-Shift?

Complexity in social dynamics : from the. micro to the macro. Lecture 4. Franco Bagnoli. Lecture 4. Namur 7-18/4/2008

Human society is organized into sets. We participate in

Evolutionary Game Theory

Evolutionary Game Theory and Frequency Dependent Selection

The Stability for Tit-for-Tat

Alana Schick , ISCI 330 Apr. 12, The Evolution of Cooperation: Putting gtheory to the Test

Living in groups 1. What are three costs and three benefits of living in groups?

Evolution of Social Behavior: Kin Selection & Sociobiology. Goal: Why does altruism exist in nature?

Evolutionary Dynamics in Structured Populations

VII. Cooperation & Competition

Physica A. Promoting cooperation by local contribution under stochastic win-stay-lose-shift mechanism

Brief history of The Prisoner s Dilemma (From Harman s The Price of Altruism)

Divided We Stand: The Evolution of Altruism. Darwin 101. The Paradox of Altruism. Altruism: Costly behavior that helps others

Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations

The Continuous Prisoner s Dilemma and the Evolution of Cooperation through Reciprocal Altruism with Variable Investment

Emergence of Cooperation and Evolutionary Stability in Finite Populations

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation

Genetic stability and territorial structure facilitate the evolution of. tag-mediated altruism. Lee Spector a and Jon Klein a,b

arxiv: v2 [q-bio.pe] 13 Apr 2016

Cooperation Achieved by Migration and Evolution in a Multilevel Selection Context

Evolution of Cooperation in the Snowdrift Game with Incomplete Information and Heterogeneous Population

Repeated Games and Direct Reciprocity Under Active Linking

ALTRUISM OR JUST SHOWING OFF?

On the evolution of reciprocal cooperation

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Theoretical Biology

Analytical Results for Individual and Group Selection of Any Intensity

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oc] 29 Jun 2004

Evolution of Diversity and Cooperation 2 / 3. Jorge M. Pacheco. Departamento de Matemática & Aplicações Universidade do Minho Portugal

Evolution of Cooperation in Continuous Prisoner s Dilemma Games on Barabasi Albert Networks with Degree-Dependent Guilt Mechanism

arxiv: v2 [q-bio.pe] 19 Mar 2009

Application of Evolutionary Game theory to Social Networks: A Survey

The Paradox of Cooperation Benets

Bacterial cooperation leads to heteroresistance

Cooperation. Main points for today. How can altruism evolve? Group living vs. cooperation. Sociality-nocooperation. and cooperationno-sociality

Dynamics and Chaos. Melanie Mitchell. Santa Fe Institute and Portland State University

Evolutionary Games and Computer Simulations

evolutionary dynamics of collective action

Communities and Populations

The Replicator Equation on Graphs

Hamilton s Rule Applied to Reciprocal Altruism

MATCHING STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION IN THE PRISONER S DILEMMA

Darwinian Evolution of Cooperation via Punishment in the Public Goods Game

The Evolution of Cooperation in Self-Interested Agent Societies: A Critical Study

Evolution of Cooperation in Evolutionary Games for Heterogeneous Interactions

Reward from Punishment Does Not Emerge at All Costs

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 7 Aug 2012

Public Goods with Punishment and Abstaining in Finite and Infinite Populations

Thursday, September 26, 13

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 18 Dec 2017

Evolutionary Games on Structured Populations under Weak Selection

Dynamic-persistence of cooperation in public good games when group size is dynamic

The Evolution of Cooperation under Cheap Pseudonyms

arxiv: v1 [physics.soc-ph] 11 Nov 2007

Phase transitions in social networks

arxiv: v2 [math.ds] 27 Jan 2015

Evolutionary Bargaining Strategies

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Graph topology and the evolution of cooperation

Selfishness and Cooperation: Challenge for Social Life

Computational Problems Related to Graph Structures in Evolution

arxiv: v4 [q-bio.pe] 16 Feb 2011

Relative importance of social synergy, assortation and networks in the evolution of social cooperation.

Unifying the Theories of Inclusive Fitness and Reciprocal Altruism

Kalle Parvinen. Department of Mathematics FIN University of Turku, Finland

coordinating towards a common good

Problems on Evolutionary dynamics

Stability in negotiation games and the emergence of cooperation

Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games

Behavior of Collective Cooperation Yielded by Two Update Rules in Social Dilemmas: Combining Fermi and Moran Rules

Measures of success in a class of evolutionary models with fixed population size and structure

Biological institutions: an institutional perspective on biological cooperation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Some Analytical Properties of the Model for Stochastic Evolutionary Games in Finite Populations with Non-uniform Interaction Rate

Prosperity is associated with instability in dynamical networks

N-Player Prisoner s Dilemma

Cooperation Behaviors selected that benefit a recipient. Either altruistic ( -,+) or mutualistic (+,+). Can occur across species.

Instability in Spatial Evolutionary Games

BELIEFS & EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORY

Evolution of Altruistic Robots

What is altruism? Benefit another at a cost to yourself. Fitness is lost!

Spatial Evolutionary Games

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /jeb.

Spatial three-player prisoners dilemma

Evolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection

Game interactions and dynamics on networked populations

Oscillatory dynamics in evolutionary games are suppressed by heterogeneous adaptation rates of players

Evolutionary dynamics on graphs: Efficient method for weak selection

Policing and group cohesion when resources vary

ABSTRACT: Dissolving the evolutionary puzzle of human cooperation.

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Theoretical Biology

Mathematics of Planet Earth

6. Evolu)on, Co- evolu)on (and Ar)ficial Life) Part 1

Reputation-based mutual selection rule promotes cooperation in spatial threshold public goods games

Eleven mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation

Extortion and Evolution in the Iterated Prisoner s Dilemma

Questions About Social Behavior

The evolution of norms

Culture Outsmarts Nature in the Evolution of Cooperation

Transcription:

Evolution of cooperation Martin Nowak, Harvard University

As the Fukushima power plant was melting down, a worker in his 20s was among those who volunteered to reenter.

In an interview he said: There are only some of us who can do this job. I'm single and young, and I feel it's my duty to help settle this problem.

Time line 13700 Universe 4567 Sun 3500 chemical evidence of life on Earth 2100 bacterial fossils (simple multi-cellular) 1800 eucaria 600 complex multi-cellularity 120 insect societies 1 human language million years ago cooperation is needed for construction

What is it that evolves? Populations of reproducing individuals

Mutation

Selection

Cooperation

What is cooperation? Donor pays a cost, c Recipient gets a benefit, b Cost and benefit are measured in terms of fitness. Reproduction can be genetic or cultural.

Prisoner s Dilemma I cooperate I defect you cooperate b - c - c you defect b 0 b > c > 0 you get

What is the dilemma? Two rational players defect and end up with a low payoff, 0. Two irrational players might cooperate and receive a higher payoff, b c.

Natural selection chooses defection C C C C D D C C D D D D D D D In any mixed population, defectors have a higher payoff than cooperators.

Natural selection needs help to favor cooperators over defectors.

Five mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation: Direct reciprocity Indirect reciprocity Spatial selection Group selection Kin selection

Direct reciprocity I help you, you help me.

Repeated Prisoner s Dilemma Player 1 : C D C D C C C. Player 2 : D C D D C C C. The Folk theorem

Repeated Prisoner s Dilemma Player 1 : C D C D C C C. Player 2 : D C D D C C C. What is a good strategy for playing this game? Robert Axelrod

Tit-for-tat I start with cooperation. If you cooperate, then I will cooperate. If you defect, then I will defect. Anatol Rapaport

Tit-for-tat is unforgiving Errors destroy cooperation Tit-for-tat : CCCCDCDCDCDDDDDD. Tit-for-tat : CCCDCDCDCDDDDDDD.

Let natural selection design a strategy Random

Let natural selection design a strategy Always defect Random

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Always defect Random

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Generous Tit-for-tat Always defect Random

Generous Tit-for-tat I start with cooperation. If you cooperate, then I will cooperate. If you defect, then I will cooperate with a certain probability (q = 1- c / b). Evolution of forgiveness

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Generous Tit-for-tat Always defect Random

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Generous Tit-for-tat Always defect Always cooperate Random

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Generous Tit-for-tat Always defect Always cooperate War and peace

Let natural selection design a strategy Tit-for-tat Generous Tit-for-tat Always defect Always cooperate Win-stay, lose-shift

Win-stay, lose-shift If I am doing well (payoff b or b-c) then I will repeat my move. If I am doing badly (payoff 0 or -c) then I will change my move. If b/c<2 then a stochastic variant of WSLS does well (where you return to C after DD only with a certain probability).

Direct reciprocity allows the evolution of cooperation if w > c / b b benefit c cost w probability of another round

Indirect reciprocity I help you. Somebody helps me.

Indirect reciprocity works via reputation A helps B A does not help B A B A B The reputation of A increases. The reputation of A decreases. donor recipient donor s reputation cooperate -c +b +1 defect 0 0-1 Nowak & Sigmund, Nature 1998

Experimental confirmation: People help those who help others. Helpful people have a higher payoff in the end. Wedekind & Milinski, Science 2000

Gossip spreads reputation A helps B A B Observers Rest of the population gossip Reputation of A is updated.

Games of indirect reciprocity are cognitively demanding; individuals need to monitor the social network of a group. => evolution of social intelligence Individuals must be able to talk to each other about others. => evolution of human language

David Haig: For direct reciprocity you need a face. For indirect reciprocity you need a name.

A rule for indirect reciprocity q > c / b q probability to know someone s reputation c cost of cooperation b benefit of cooperation

Spatial selection Spatial games Games on graphs Games in phenotype space Games on sets

Spatial games Cooperators Defectors Nowak & May, Nature 1992

Games on graphs D D D D C C D C C C Cooperators Defectors The graph describes a spatial structure or a social network. Evolutionary graph theory (Lieberman et al, Nature 2005)

b b D D D 2b-2c C b b D D 2b-5c C C C C 2b-3c Cooperators pay a cost c for each neighbor to receive benefit b.

Spatial selection on graphs favors cooperation if b / c > k k (average) number of neighbors weak selection Ohtsuki et al, Nature 2006

Evolutionary set theory People belong to sets. People interact with others in the same sets. People adopt strategy and set membership of successful individuals. Tarnita et al, PNAS 2009

Evolutionary set theory N people M sets K set memberships per person u strategy mutation rate v set mutation rate b c >1+ 2 K M * Tarnita et al, PNAS 2009

Games in phenotype space Cooperation by similarity / tag based Phenotype space b c >1+ 2 3 Antal et al, PNAS 2009

Group selection There can be no doubt that a tribe including many members who [...] are always ready to give aid to each other and to sacrifice themselves for the common good, would be victorious over other tribes; and this would be natural selection. Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 1871

Group selection D D D C C D C C D D C C C C Play the game with others in your group. Offspring are added to the group. Groups divide when reaching a certain size. Groups die.

Group selection favors cooperators if b / c > 1 + n / m n group size m number of groups Traulsen & Nowak, PNAS 2006

Kin selection The interaction occurs between genetic relatives. I will jump into the river to save 2 brothers or 8 cousins J.B.S Haldane

Hamilton s rule r > c / b r coefficient of relatedness c cost of cooperation b benefit of cooperation

Problems: Most kin selection studies are based on inclusive fitness, which is a limited and problematic concept. Hamilton s rule is not a general condition, but only holds in special cases.

Five mechanisms for cooperation Direct reciprocity : I help you, you help me. Indirect reciprocity : I help you, somebody helps me. Spatial selection : Neighbors help each other. Group selection : groups of cooperators out-compete other groups. Kin selection : cooperate with genetic relatives.

Direct and indirect reciprocity are the key components for understanding the evolution of any pro-social behavior in humans. But what made us human is indirect reciprocity, because it selected for social intelligence and human language.

We must learn global cooperation. and cooperation with future generations.

Cooperators Ben Allen (Harvard) Tibor Antal (Edinburgh) Ivana Bozic (Harvard) Krishnendu Chatterjee (IST) Anna Dreber (Stockholm) Feng Fu (Zurich) Drew Fudenberg (Harvard) Christoph Hauert (UBC) Oliver Hauser (Harvard) Alison Hill (Harvard) Lorens Imhof (Bonn) Erez Lieberman (Houston) Robert May (Oxford) Hisashi Ohtsuki (Tokyo) Jorge Pacheco (Minho) Alexander Peysakhovich (Harvard) David Rand (Yale) Johannes Reiter (IST) Karl Sigmund (Vienna) Corina Tarnita (Princeton) Arne Traulsen (Ploen) Matthijs van Veelen (Amsterdam) E. O. Wilson (Harvard)

Simon & Schuster 2011