Technology Challenges for Starshade Missions

Similar documents
New Worlds Observer tolerance overview ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION STARSHADE

Starshade Technology Status

The Nulling Coronagraph Using a Nulling Interferometer for Planet Detection in Visible Light with a Single Aperture Telescope

Results from the automated Design Reference Mission constructor for exoplanet imagers

SGL Coronagraph Simulation

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

CHARA Collaboration Year-Eight Science Review. VLTI update. F. Delplancke

Key Technology Challenges for the Study of Exoplanets and the Search for Habitable Worlds

Application of Precision Deformable Mirrors to Space Astronomy

Goddard Space Flight Center

External Occulters for the Direct Study of Exoplanets

James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)

Terrestrial Planet Detection Approaches: Externally Occulted Hybrid Coronagraphs

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

How Giovanni s Balloon Borne Telescope Contributed to Today s Search for Life on Exoplanets

Team X Study Summary for ASMCS Theia. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. with contributions from the Theia Team

Techniques for direct imaging of exoplanets

New Worlds Imager. Webster Cash, University of Colorado. W. Cash University of Colorado 1. New Worlds Imager

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 10 Oct 2017

Appendix: B. Mission Requirements Summary NEW WORLDS OBSERVER (NWO) MISSION 4/23/2009

JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE (JWST) - FINE GUIDENCE SENSOR AND TUNABLE FILTER IMAGER OPTICAL DESIGN OVERVIEW AND STATUS

New Worlds Observer Telescope and Instrument Optical Design Concepts

NIAC Annual Meeting New Worlds Imager. Webster Cash University of Colorado October 17, 2006

The WFIRST Coronagraphic Instrument (CGI)

Formation Flying System Design for a Planet-Finding Telescope-Occulter System

Hypertelescope Optical Observatory

The New Worlds Observer: The Astrophysics Strategic Mission Concept Study

Exoplanet High Contrast Imaging: Space

life detection capabilities of LUVOIR and HabEx and WFIRST

The Kepler Exoplanet Survey: Instrumentation, Performance and Results

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Alternative Starshade Missions

Webster Cash University of Colorado. X-ray Interferometry

USING THE ISS TO ASSEMBLE A VERY LARGE TELESCOPE

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

Joint Milli-Arcsecond Pathfinder Survey (JMAPS): Overview and Application to NWO Mission

Introduction to Interferometer and Coronagraph Imaging

Searching for Earth-Like Planets:

If habitable planets are common, NWO will discover them. If life in the Universe is abundant, NWO will find it.

Exoplanet Detection and Characterization with Mid-Infrared Interferometry

Fully achromatic nulling interferometer (FANI) for high SNR exoplanet characterization

Proximity Glare Suppression for Astronomical Coronagraphy (S2.01) and Precision Deployable Optical Structures and Metrology (S2.

Coronagraphy from Orbiting Platforms. Rémi Soummer KISS workshop Innovative Approaches to Exoplanet Spectra 11/12/09

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

Direct imaging and characterization of habitable planets with Colossus

CASE/ARIEL & FINESSE Briefing

Recommended Architectures for The Terrestrial Planet Finder

High angular resolution X-ray astronomy in the next 50 years

Radial Velocities for Exoplanet Discovery and Characterization. Debra Fischer Yale University

Pupil mapping Exoplanet Coronagraph Observer (PECO)

An evaluation of the effects of non-uniform exo-zodiacal dust distributions on planetary observations

METIS- ESA Solar Orbiter Mission: internal straylight analysis

NWO Trajectory and Alignment Control (TAC)

Spectropolarimetry for Earth observations: a novel method for characterisation of aerosols and clouds

Design reference mission construction for planet finders

Key Technology Challenges for the Study of Exoplanets and the Search for Habitable Worlds

On the possibility to create a prototype of laser system for space debris movement control on the basis of the 3-meter telescope.

Super Earths: Reflection and Emission Spectra

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix E. Section E: Starshades Subsection E.6: Starshade Spacecraft Lead Author: Amy Lo

Status of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Observatory

Cheapest nuller in the World: Crossed beamsplitter cubes

A hybrid Lyot coronagraph for the direct imaging and spectroscopy of exoplanet systems: recent results and prospects

Abstract HISAKI (SPRINT A) satellite is an earth orbiting EUV spectroscopic mission and launched on 14 Sep Extreme ultraviolet spectroscope (EX

MERIS US Workshop. Instrument Characterization Overview. Steven Delwart

The Large UV Optical IR survey telescope. Debra Fischer

High-contrast Coronagraph Development in China for Direct Imaging of Extra-solar Planets

High Dynamic Range and the Search for Planets

Engineering Specifications derived from Science Requirements for the Advanced Mirror Technology Development (AMTD) Project

Small Satellite Laser Comm Pointing

Topics for Today. Clicker Q: Radio Waves. Radios. Discussion of how do ROTATING STARS yield Doppler-broadened spectral emission lines

CubeSat and astrophysical polarimetry

Hunting Planets and Observing Disks with the JWST NIRCam Coronagraph

Astronomical Techniques

SPOT Meeting # 7 Overview and Summary. SOFIA USERS GROUP Sept 17, 2012

Fundamental Limits to Wavefront Sensing in the Submillimeter

Exoplanet Instrumentation with an ASM

Speckles and adaptive optics

Southern African Large Telescope. Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph. Instrument Acceptance Testing Plan

Medium baseline, high sensitivity, high efficiency imaging interferometer for general astrophysics

Telescopes (Chapter 6)

Theoretical Examination

Planets Around M-dwarfs Astrometric Detection and Orbit Characterization

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 4 Dec 2017

The SPICA Coronagraph

Astronomy. Optics and Telescopes

ExoplanetSat: A Nanosatellite Space Telescope for Detecting Transiting Exoplanets

Coronagraphs and Starshades for Imaging Planets from Space

McMath-Pierce Adaptive Optics Overview. Christoph Keller National Solar Observatory, Tucson

Searching for Other Worlds: The Methods

GEMINI 8-M Telescopes Project

NAOYUKI TAMURA Subaru Instrument Astronomer Subaru Telescope, NAOJ

Extreme Optics and The Search for Earth-Like Planets

If habitable planets are common, NWO will discover them. If life in the Universe is abundant, NWO will find it.

WFIRST Exoplanet Imaging: Datacubes, Community Challenges, and the Starshade Study W F I R S T

Hanle Echelle Spectrograph (HESP)

Astronomy 203 practice final examination

The New Worlds Observer:

What s Up in Space? Dean W McCall, Ed.D.

Introduction of Small Solar Power Sail Demonstrator IKAROS

Development of Microwave Engine

Transcription:

Technology Challenges for Starshade Missions Charley Noecker Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors Lorentz Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Sources for this report ASMCS studies - New Worlds and THEIA http://newworlds.colorado.edu/documents/asmcs/asmcs_documents.htm http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~dns/theia/nas_theia_v14.pdf Astro2010 white papers - Lo et. al., Levine et. al. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/astro2010/detailfiledisplay.aspx?id=525 http://www8.nationalacademies.org/astro2010/detailfiledisplay.aspx?id=488 ExoPAG 3, Jan 2011 - Kasdin and Lawson http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/1_kasdin_exopag_jan2011_v2.pdf http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/6 ExoPAG_LawsonRev5.pdf ExoPAG 4, June 2011 - Lawson http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/lawson-occulter-rev4.pdf ExEP Technology Plan Appendix Fall 2011 http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/2011appendix_fall.pdf Starshade External Occulter 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 2

Technology Areas for Starshades ~ OK ~ OK ~ Optical Diffraction Model validation Deployment accuracy/reliability Thermal and vibrational distortion Thruster performance and reliability Slew-trajectory and Alignment control Punctures (micrometeoroids) Telescope pointing Solar stray light from edges & plumes 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 3

Optical Diffraction Diffraction is governed by the perimeter shape as projected into the plane perpendicular to the line of sight; nothing else matters Toughest requirements: Petal shape accuracy: ~10-5 (25µm/2.5m) on ripples ~0.5-2 cyc/m Manufacturing tolerances perimeter structure with metering spars Thermal deformation tolerance for up to ±50 C (TBR) low-cte spars Large sheets across petal are slack (not tensioned against metering structure) Petal rigid displacements ~mm Modest engineering challenge In-plane dynamic deformations Tolerant of short transients; truss quickly damps Easy tolerances Very insensitive to petals bending out-of-plane 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 4

Optical Diffraction Verification For a flagship TPF mission, optical performance testing on the ground at full size (prototype or flight starshade) is impossible Starshade-telescope separation is 2-6 Earth diameters The only practical flight verification method is analysis Precise survey of deployed petals shape and position Diffraction calculations validated by experiment Scalar diffraction calculations are now widely trusted because of mutual agreement of several algorithms Still need experimental validation Need vector field diffraction calculations? 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 5

Deployment accuracy/reliability Petal deployment tolerance ~ ±1mm at root and ±25 mm at tip RF dish deployments commonly achieve this Petal shape stability with stow/deploy cycles Design so that structures that control shape are not stressed in stowed configuration Single-petal deployment failure threatens the mission Technology demos and analysis are in work Need demos to validate ground deployment tests as a predictor of flight deployment reliability 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 6

Thermal and vibrational distortion Shaklan SPIE paper and ExoPAG talk http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.857591 http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/17. Error Budgeting and Tolerancing by Shaklan.pdf Most bending and twisting causes starlight leakage only quadratically or higher, with cm- or meter-scale tolerances Some shape tolerances are very tight ~tens of µm Mixture of design and testing needed to control manufacturing and deployment accuracy and on-orbit stability Some thought has been given to actively controlling edge shape 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 7

Starshade manufacturing tolerances http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/files/exep/17.%20error%20budgeting%20and%20tolerancing%20by%20shaklan.pdf 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 8

Thruster performance and reliability Mission requirement v 10 km/sec High I sp thrusters are the best option for long slews NEXT thruster from NASA Glenn has demonstrated Over 664-kg xenon throughput (2 reqt) 25 10 6 N-s of total impulse (1 reqt), and >38,000 hours (0.87 reqt) http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080047732_2008047267.pdf Station keeping during observation Options include hydrazine and PPT thrusters Ion thrusters not compatible These are mature enough for now no technology development needed in this area 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 9

Slew-trajectory control Guiding the slew from one star to the next Science stars Starshade Telescope Antipode field stars Large star tracker (20-30 cm dia) on starshade observes distant telescope (sunlight glint) surrounded by the background star field Navigate to put telescope at the right RA/Dec Telescope is the one that moves at up to 9 /minute Blinking beacon on telescope might speed identification during formation initialization, but has its own challenges 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 10

Acquiring the shadow Science star Starshade Science Telescope Antipode field stars Antipode field stars Science Telescope Bright science star Science star Science star Retro Retro Star Tracker alignment camera on Starshade Science telescope & antipode field stars Casting starshade s shadow on the science telescope Retroreflectors make the star tracker into a sextant Compare the science star (behind the alignment camera) to the science telescope (in front) on the same detector Steer science star images vs. telescope, within 100 mas 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 11

Position (m) Position, m Starshade Alignment control during observations Telescope Requirement for telescope centering in shadow within ±1 m Occulter position error is sensed by HgCdTe camera that images the pupil Uncertainty 1.3mm per axis in 1 sec, mag 6 star Log10 intensity profile at Flux telescope (phot/sec) entrance, =1.5-2.3 m 40 2-40 -2-40 -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40-2 -1.5-1 -0.5Position, 0 m 0.5 1 1.5 2 (m) Differential gravity and solar pressure are very feeble Control loop time is typically > 200s Huge SNR surplus, which we can spend tuning the control loop for minimum fuel consumption 1.5 30 20 1 0.5 10 0-0.5-10 -20-1 -30-1.5 0-0.5-1 600-1.5-2 400-2.5 200-3 1000 800 Table 1. Shadow sensor parameters Pixel size in pupil 4 cm Pupil diameter 4 m CCD QE 80% Optical throughput 54.2% Wavelengths 1.5-2.3 µm Solid angle 30"x30" Dark rate 0.004 /sec Read noise 14 Thermal emission 61 /sec 0 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 12

Punctures through starshade fabric Single hole: r=0.5cm, =550 nm, D=80,000 km I = ( r 2 / D) 2 = 3.2 10-12 Single layer fabric, many holes: r=0.5 mm, density = 100/m 2 (e.g. 10 cm grid) I = ( r 2 ) 2 = 6.2 10-9 (square of area fill factor) All that light appears in the focal plane right in the middle of the starshade not where planets are With punctures through a multilayer fabric, optical field phase is scrambled at each layer all random I = ( r 2 / D) 2 ( D) = 1.4 10-12 Appears all over the starshade, not beyond Punctures look pretty benign 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 13

Telescope pointing With star suppressed, we need good pointing so that The planet is not smeared The star position is known well enough for planet orbit determination Unlike coronagraphs, our best guide star is blocked before reaching the telescope Possible mitigation alternatives: Field stars surrounding the exoplanet science star Deliberate leakage by pinholes partial transmission 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 14

Solar stray light from edges & plumes Looking for faint planet light past starshade edges, thrusters spray propellant across those lines of sight Sunlight on the plumes causes unknown stray light Sunlight on edges of starshade petals is adjacent to planet pixels If edge scatter of sunlight exozodi, then radius of curvature <7µm (like a commercial razor blade) Can relax by ~5 with some sensitivity loss near sunward edges 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 15

Technology Areas for Starshades ~ OK ~ OK ~ Optical Diffraction Model validation Deployment accuracy/reliability Thermal and vibrational distortion Thruster performance and reliability Slew-trajectory and Alignment control Punctures (micrometeoroids) Telescope pointing Solar stray light from edges & plumes 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 16

Fresnel zones Sizing Rules of Thumb Define F = Fresnel no. > 4-5 α = IWA = star-planet angle 50-100 mas Radius of starshade R = F / Telescope-starshade distance D = F / 2 Starshade scaling R=25m starshade allows planet detection at =0.6µm at =50 mas Hypergaussian starshade, 65 mas 14 13 12 11 10 N=3.15, 0.4 m N=2.52, 0.5 m IWA=65 mas, tele diam=4 m ASMCS 08-09 35 m, 111.1 Mm 30 m, 95.2 Mm 25 m, 79.3 Mm -7-7.5-8 -8.5 9 N=2.10, 0.6 m -9 Allows spectral characterization to =0.8µm at =65 mas, = 1µm at =81 mas 8 7 6 5 4 N=1.80, 0.7 m N=1.58, 0.8 m N=1.40, 0.9 m N=1.26, 1 m 20 m, 63.5 Mm 3 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 (Radial position)/(a+b) 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 17-9.5-10 -10.5-11

Fresnel zones Scaling for optimized starshade Petal shape optimization yields good suppression at smaller F~2.5 Optimizer was allowed to sacrifice suppression outside prime passband Stellar diffraction rises at large F as well Bounds the exoplanet science in the UV Larger telescopes have reduced range 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 N=3.15, 0.4 m N=2.52, 0.5 m N=2.10, 0.6 m N=1.80, 0.7 m N=1.58, 0.8 m N=1.40, 0.9 m N=1.26, 1 m IWA=65 mas, tele diam=4 m 25 m, 79.3 Mm 20 m, 63.5 Mm 18 m, 57.1 Mm 16 m, 50.8 Mm -7-7.5-8 -8.5-9 -9.5-10 3-10.5 Deep hole begins at F~2.5 Can use a smaller starshade Stops at F~8 Limited flexibility to change the IWA by using different starshade distances Exoplanet sensitivity is bounded at UV end Re-optimization could extend wavelength range 2 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 (Radial position)/(a+b) -11 10/14/2012 How to Find Our Nearest Neighbors - Starshade Technology 18