Getting Biodiversity Data

Similar documents
Geospatial Policy Development and Institutional Arrangements *

Observation (EO) & Geomatics in Canada

EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. Creating and Delivering Better Solutions

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Aboriginal communities strengthen governance with location-based tools in the 21st century

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Impact Policies Enabling Value Enhancement of Geospatial Information in Canadian Economy and Society

Arctic ecosystem services: TEEB Arctic Scoping study. Alexander Shestakov WWF Global Arctic Programme 3 December Arctic Biodiversity Congress

DFO Maritimes Region Update. Gulf of Maine Council - Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP) Committee Web-Ex May 16, 2017

The Canadian Ceoscience Knowledge Network. - A Collaborative Effort for Unified Access to Ceoscience Data

Land Accounts - The Canadian Experience

Measuring ecosystems and biodiversity and related goods and services

Designing Networks of Marine Protected Areas in DFO s Three Atlantic Bioregions

Terms of Reference for the Comparative Environmental Review (CER) of. Options for the Mactaquac Project, Mactaquac, New Brunswick

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

THE NATURESERVE NETWORK

Exploring GIS Potential for Northwestern Ontario Land Information Ontario

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

The GIS Path Forward Saskatchewan s Geomatics Strategic Plan

A TOOLKIT FOR MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING Version: 17 July, 2009

Update to the Association of Ontario Land Surveyors February 27, 2015 Deerhurst, Ontario

Standards in Action: The Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI)

Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management

Economic Benefit Study on Value of Spatial Information Australian Experience

PROMOTING NATURE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS OF HONG KONG

The North American Drought Monitor - The Canadian Perspective -

the map Redrawing Donald Hobern takes a look at the challenges of managing biodiversity data [ Feature ]

What s the problem? A Modern Odyssey in Search of Relevance. The search for relevance. Some current drivers for new services. Some Major Applications

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Building capacity to support decisionmaking for protection and management of marine areas

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

Marine Spatial Planning Leslie-Ann McGee Battelle Memorial Institute

Robert V. Maher Nova Scotia Land Survey Institute Box 10, Lawrencetown, N. S., Canada BOS 1MO

Realizing benefits of Spatial Data Infrastructure A user s perspective from Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi

Canada s Experience with Chemicals Assessment and Management and its Application to Nanomaterials

Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report Finland. Submitted by Director General Jarmo Ratia, National Land Survey

Advancing Geoscientific Capability. Geological Survey of Finland

Project Primary Contact: Gregg Servheen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25 Boise, ID ,

Geographic Locations Survey of Clinical Psychologists in Canada

GIS Changing the World GIS Day November 15, 2017

Community and Infrastructure Services Committee

Natural Resource Management. Northern Tasmania. Strategy. Appendix 2

Opportunities and Priorities in a New Era for Weather and Climate Services

NOAA S2S Planning. Dave DeWitt Fred Toepfer

Understanding DWAs in First Nations Systems A Data Mining Approach

Climate Trends and Variations Bulletin Winter

ISO Canadian Drought Monitor Data Product Specifications

On the Feasibility of Quantitative Population Viability Analysis in Recovery Planning: Efforts to Bridge the Gap Between Theory and Practice

Pre-Calculus 12. Resource Exam B. Exam Booklet I. Multiple-Choice and Written-Response Questions Calculator Permitted.

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Data Sources and Methods for the Protected Areas Indicators. August 2014

Pinchin Ltd. Asbestos Laboratory Certificate of Analysis

Landscape Planning and Habitat Metrics

The Periphery in the Knowledge Economy

ESTIMATING THE SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF ADVENTURE TOURISM AND RECREATION ON CROWN LAND IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

A Regional Database Tracking Fire Footprint Each Year within the South Atlantic Region: Current Database Description and Future Directions

Spatial Data Availability Energizes Florida s Citizens

Introduction. Elevation Data Strategy. Status and Next Steps

Plenary Session 2, part 2 A European shared information system

USGS National Geospatial Program Understanding User Needs. Dick Vraga National Map Liaison for Federal Agencies July 2015

The 18th Annual CFES Council Meeting and General Meeting

EASTERN SCOTIAN SHELF INTEGRATED OCEAN MANAGEMENT PLAN

NatureServe s Federally Listed Species Location Data Play an Important Role in EPA s FIFRA Risk Assessments

Geologic Management. Contents

Answers to British Columbia Quizzes

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

The Agriculture Investment and Market Development Project (P143417)

Climate Services in Practice UK Perspective

THE DIGITAL TERRAIN MAP LIBRARY: AN EXPLORATIONIST S RESOURCE

Unit 1 Physical Setting

Background. North Cascades Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement. Steve Rochetta

International Guidelines for Ecosystem-based, Marine Spatial Management

Urban Climate Resilience

GIS Capability Maturity Assessment: How is Your Organization Doing?

Oregon Department of Transportation. Geographic Information Systems Strategic Plan

The National Spatial Strategy

PROPOSED UNESCO FUNDY BIOSPHERE RESERVE

Fire Season Prediction for Canada, Kerry Anderson Canadian Forest Service

National Land Use Policy and National Integrated Planning Framework for Land Resource Development

Spatial Graph Theory for Cross-scale Connectivity Analysis

BOEM Marine Minerals Program

Progress Report (Since February, 2014)

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Through their research, geographers gather a great deal of data about Canada.

Multi-sector biodiversity surveys: integrating federal, territorial and community-based surveys. Kevin J. Hedges

1 Complementary Access Tools

EU collaborations with NASA LCLUC Program & Current Priorities

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC SECTOR ANALYSIS

The World Bank Sri Lanka Agriculture Sector Modernization Project (P156019)

Climate Change: Why Worry?

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Data for People and Planet. powered by

Spatial Decision-Support for National Marine Conservation Areas in the Southern Strait of Georgia and Gwaii Haanas

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Marine Protected Area Network Planning in the Bay of Fundy and Scotian Shelf. Progress to date and next steps

State GIS Officer/GIS Data

Transcription:

Getting Biodiversity Data NatureServe Canada Douglas Hyde Executive Director

Value of biodiversity data to business? Reasons vary depending on the business Reduce development uncertainty Integrated views of data help communicate priorities; Businesses can avoid or minimize planning risks Increase operational efficiency Ties to permitting, EA, monitoring, performance audits Enhance mitigation, adaptation Enhance/protect market access Avoid pest import/export, product life cycle assessment Ensure consumer acceptance Communicate performance, support effective CSR, environmental reporting CBBC Completing Business Data Needs Assessment (why, what, how)

Responsibility for biodiversity Primary mandate: Provincial and territorial governments (lead); Indigenous peoples (land claims) Fisheries and Oceans Canada (marine, fish habitat); Environment Canada (migratory birds, MBS, NWA); Parks Canada; Federal (North - AAND (DIAND)) Role: Other federal agencies (e.g., Agriculture and Agri-food Canada; NRCan, CFIA, PHAC), municipalities, non-profit organizations (e.g., NCC, DU, CBI, land trusts), business (e.g., mining, oil and gas, electricity, forestry, etc.) NatureServe Canada supports international vegetation classification standards.

About NatureServe Canada

Data overview About 50,000 species elements and 1,500 community elements in our system nationally; 80 experts Of these, 12,000 elements are actively tracked (spatially) Approximately 125,000 EOs nationally Each EO can represent one to thousands of specimen/observation records Data for most elements is incomplete

NatureServe Canada Network Nine conservation data centres (CDCs) Atlantic Canada CDC (PEI, NS, NB and Newfoundland and Labrador) Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre Manitoba CDC Saskatchewan CDC Alberta CIMS British Columbia CDC Yukon CDC NWT CDC Standards and consistent methods Data aggregated on a national basis Membership expanding

CDCs as aggregators: Data sharing fundamental

NatureServe s Business Process and Tools

NatureServe s Business Process and Tools

Consistent, Quality Data Product: Network-based Spatial Methodology

Understanding an Element Occurrence An EO is a locational record representing one or more populations of a species Developed through a process which defines/ refines the meaning of an observation or observations Assess locational uncertainty (what exactly was the observation - telemetry, passive survey, active survey) Explore separation distance (what does the observation mean - a distinct population?) Requires documented source for the observation (as a source feature - only need information about the survey, nothing else)

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

EO Refinement 1. Historical record 2. EO - locational uncertainty high, no consideration of separation distance (single record) 3. New observations - locational uncertainty lower, no consideration of separation distance 4. New observations, locational uncertainty lower, consideration of separation distance (based on EO specifications) 5. Documentation of source features 6. Biodiversity in flux - Ongoing refinement

Prairie White-fringed Orchid

Ecological Community Mapping Apply international vegetation classification standards in Canada Completed mapping and ranking of ecological communities at fine scales in Alberta (est. ~$10 million nation-wide) Assist in management, modelling applications (fire, pest, range, habitat, ecosystem service evaluation) and in priority setting

How is biodiversity data used?

Types&of&data&requests*& Site%Management% Conserva0on%Program%Planning% Land%Use%Planning% Environmental%Assessment% Status%assessments% Other% * Estimated, based on 2009 request data

Fine Scale: Property Management and Project EA Screening: Simple questions can focus effort What federal or provincially listed species at the site? What other species? Where are they? What threatens them? Beyond screening Engage proper experts Trigger for additional study

Coarse Level Decision Making: Species at Risk by EcoDistrict

Demand for data? NatureServe Data can be accessed through NatureServe Explorer, Web Services, or through custom data requests Individual CDC s have their own tools tailored to provincial legislation or planning requirements Ontario Explorer CDC Internet Mapping Service BC Species and Ecosystems Explorer Others Currently estimate more than 500 thousands queries per month Custom requests for some data: Must respect data sensitivity

Who is asking for data? Total Data Requests Consultants Government Academic ENGO Public Industry Press USA CAN Int Unknown Requests: Consultant Breakdown Consultant - Industry Consultant - Gov't Consultant - ENGO Consultant - unknown Consultant - Gov't Federal Consultant - First Nations Consultant - Gov't Local Consultant - Gov't Provincial Requests: Government Breakdown Gov't Local Gov't Provincial Gov't Federal First Nations BC CDC tracks client requests ~ 900 per year (2009) Response time from 6.5 to 2.7 days since 2004 Time to process requests from 0.5 hours in 2004 to 0.25 hours in 2008

What is the status of biodiversity data?

Data Highly Fragmented; Data Incomplete Welcome/Bienvenue

Spatial Limitations: Element Occurrences in eastern Canada Network data coverage for some species in some areas is high; artifact of where species of conservation risk occur Need more survey work for priority species to enhance coverage Data quality affected by age of supporting observational data - need ongoing investments in surveys and inventories

Taxonomic Gaps

Data is highly fragmented Several primary focal points for accessing data (each with limitations) NatureServe Canada (provinces, territories with focus on rare species) Canadensys (primarily from universities; plants, insects) Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility (primarily from federal sources)

Other data sources Bird Studies Canada (bird species) Canadian Museum of Nature (north?) Agriculture and Agri-food Canada (CNC) GBIF (not quality reviewed)

Implications The costs of obtaining data generally outweigh the benefits to decision making. Business adaptation? Sufficing Aggregate the data you can in the time available - hit known focal points Do it yourself data Solves short term problem, introduces new issues Reinforces fragmentation Get help (following standards? competent observer? Sharing results? CDC, other)

Can we improve access to biodiversity data?

Work together Overcome barriers to data sharing Develop technology tools to facilitate defragmentation, digitization and sharing Mine and apply standards to existing data Be proactive about ties to decision making, insist on relevance Reduce cost of developing and accessing data, ensure tied to priorities Adopt new technologies, approaches that increase data (bar coding, directed citizen science) Enhance coordination Create a national repository for data Business has an important voice

A Vision A Canadian Institute for Biodiversity Information - outside government, joins fragmented communities, a network - funded by federal, provincial agencies; cost recovery mandate; supports business decision making - promotes a Canadian observational data standard (based on DwC), creates spatial data products - sets priorities every 3 years for a national biological survey, based on (1) an understanding of demand, (2) a synthesis of existing data (identification of gaps); offers funding - ensures data is gathered and made available to researchers, CDCs - gathers data and produces reports based on expert input to address issues of the day (policy relevance)

Bar Coding Cost of processing and gathering data diminishing Target at lesser studied taxonomic groups? Tie to citizen science - enable accurate identification Build strong corporate sector support - tie to monitoring requirements

Naturally Connected: Expanding Canadian Biodiversity Citizen Science

Thank you! Questions? What data does business need?