Laboratory Quality Control Report: Why is it Important?

Similar documents
Water Quality Reporting Limits, Method Detection Limits, and Censored Values: What Does It All Mean?

Water Quality MDLs, PQLs, and Censored Values What Does It All Mean?

Copyright ENCO Laboratories, Inc. II. Quality Control. A. Introduction

Laboratory Techniques 100: Back To Basics. Carol Injasoulian Lab Manager City of Bay City April 29,2015

ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE

Measurement Uncertainty: A practical guide to understanding what your results really mean.

And how to do them. Denise L Seman City of Youngstown

Revision: 11 (MBAS) ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE. Standard Laboratory Method:

QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR CHEMISTRY EXCEPT RADIOCHEMISTRY.

Hach Method Total Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Catalyzed Ozone Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis

Water & Wastewater. Laboratory Math

QA/QC in the Wastewater Laboratory. Steve Roberts Ohio EPA Division of Environmental Services 05/11/2016

Is the laboratory s pledge or declaration of the quality of the results produced. to produce data compliant with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

American Environmental Testing Laboratory Inc.

Hach Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Free Chlorine (Cl 2 ) in Finished Drinking Water

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Results of the EPA Method 1631 Validation Study

CHAPTER VI ANALYTICAL METHODS & QUALITY CONTROL

This procedure describes the monitoring activities in a laboratory quality control (QC) program to ensure the quality of test results.

December 30, Laboratory Report This Page is to be Stamped Introduction: This report package contains total of 5 pages divided into 3 sections:

Glossary of Common Laboratory Terms

Understanding and Interpreting Soil and Plant Tissue Lab Reports

METHOD 7B - DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES (ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD)

Method Validation and Accreditation

ANALYTICAL METHODS & QUALITY CONTROL

Appendix A. Glossary of Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Symbols. March 1997

APPENDIX II QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY TABLES

Laboratory 101: A Guide to Understanding your Testing Laboratory

Analytical Measurement Uncertainty APHL Quality Management System (QMS) Competency Guidelines

One Stop DIY Shop. PO Box 104 New Germany, MN Carbonyl Assay. Samples Received 09/09/2014. Analysis Report ( )

Application of Detection and Quantification Concepts to Chlorine Residual Measurements

Standard Operating Procedure for: Total Phosphorus (3010R02 Total P.doc) Missouri State University. and

Timberline Ammonia-001. Determination of Inorganic Ammonia by Continuous Flow Gas Diffusion and Conductivity Cell Analysis

Proposed Procedures for Determining the Method Detection Limit and Minimum Level

Schedule. Draft Section of Lab Report Monday 6pm (Jan 27) Summary of Paper 2 Monday 2pm (Feb 3)

LAMBTON SCIENTIFIC (A Division of Technical Chemical Services Inc.)

Review and Reporting of Chemical of Concern (COC) Concentration Data Under the TRRP Rule (30 TAC 350)

Standard Operating Procedure for: ph using Oakton ph 5+ Handheld ph Meter. Missouri State University. and

COLA Mass Spec Criteria

Accuracy: An accurate measurement is a measurement.. It. Is the closeness between the result of a measurement and a value of the measured.

ASEAN GUIDELINES FOR VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Quick Nic Juice. 122 Indian Springs Drive #5 Sandwich, IL Carbonyl Assay Samples Received 3/16/2015. Analysis Report ( )

ASCORBIC ACID METHOD FOR PHOSPHORUS DETERMINATION

GOOD TEST PORTIONS. QA / QC: A Critical Need for Laboratory Sampling

Laboratory ID. Laboratory Name. Analyst(s) Auditor. Date(s) of Audit. Type of Audit Initial Biennial Special ELCP TNI/NELAP.

Quality Control Procedures for Graphite Furnace AAS using Avanta Software

PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)

Z/zs. tnitiats: wu\ Z-z* I A. sop-c-102. Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand. Revision 6. Approval: Effective date: 3. Renewat date: 7lt:,:

Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids (PFAA) in Water by LC/MS/MS - PBM

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TESTING AUTHORITIES (NATA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION OF ICP-MS TECHNIQUES

EPA Office of Water Method Update Rule Final August 28, 2017 William Lipps October 2017

OBJECTIVE DATA PACKAGE DELIVERABLES

Draft PS 18 APPENDIX A Dynamic Spiking Procedure ( ) 1.1 This appendix to Performance Specification 18

~ ALG ANALYTICAL LABORATORY GROUP

KESTREL. April 26, Mr. Stephen Evans Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road Wiscasset, Maine 04578

Analytical Report

Introduction to Measurement

ACZ Laboratories, Inc Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO (800)

Instructions for the teacher

Percent Solids Determination

Table of Contents I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE:... 3 II. AUTHORITY:... 3 III. REFERENCE:... 3 IV. RESPONSIBILITY:... 3 V. POLICY:... 3 VI. PROCEDURE:...

LAP-013. Procedure Title: Date: 6/28/96. Author: Raymond Ruiz and Tina Ehrman ISSUE DATE: 8/26/96 SUPERSEDES: 11/01/94.

Protocol for the design, conducts and interpretation of collaborative studies (Resolution Oeno 6/2000)

SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR

Hydra-C Application Note: 1076

MPCA Water Quality Database

Method Validation. Role of Validation. Two levels. Flow of method validation. Method selection

Standard Operating Procedure for Performing a QA Review of an Aldehyde Data Batch

A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation, (Eurachem).

Understanding the Uncertainty Associated with Analytical Results: Sources, Control and Interpretation of Results. Marc Paquet, Chemist M.Sc.

Update on ASTM and Standard Methods method development activities

Source: Chapter 5: Errors in Chemical Analyses

Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on Thursday, February 25, 2010.

SWGDRUG GLOSSARY. Independent science-based organization that has the authority to grant

TNI Standard; EL-V1M4 Sections and (Detection and Quantitation) page1 of 8. TNI Standard VOLUME 1 MODULE 4

Section A LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia 2007 All Rights Reserved.

METHOD 9210 POTENTIOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF NITRATE IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES WITH ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODE

QAM-Q-101 Laboratory Quality Control

Zinc Metal Determination Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorption Spectrometer AAnalyst Procedures

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SECTOR VOLUME 1 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LABORATORIES PERFORMING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Appendix A - Test Methods Method 301--Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various Waste Media

SeCtiOn 5 [STOCK AND CUSTOM] Assurance. Multi-Element CLP Standards

Test Method: CPSC-CH-E

California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

TNI V1M Standard Update Guidance on Detection and Quantitation

Laboratory ID. Laboratory Name. Address. Phone. Lab Manager/Supervisor. QA Officer. Analyst(s) Auditor. Date(s) of Audit

Standard Operating Procedure for: Conductivity Using Cole-Parmer Traceable Portable Conductivity Meter. Missouri State University.

Stream Water Quality Assessment of Long Point Gully, Graywood Gully, and Sand Point Gully: Conesus Lake Tributaries Spring 2012

Hach Company TNTplus 835/836 Nitrate Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Nitrate in Water and Wastewater

LABORATORY REPORT. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call us at (800) or (574)

SECTION D.2 AMMONIA NITROGEN

LABORATORY REPORT. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call us at (800) or (574)

Spectrophotometric Determination of Ferrocyanide in Effluents

Method 8270C PAH. FD- Field Duplicate Samples

Applications of Ion-Selective Electrodes

Gyrolab Protein A Kit Quantification of residual Protein A ligands in the presence of excess amounts of IgG

Quality Assurance is what we do to get the right answer for our purpose FITNESS FOR PURPOSE

Matrix Effects and Uncertainty. A framework for further study. The two analytical problems

Biol/Chem 4900/4912. Forensic Internship Lecture 5

Transcription:

Laboratory Quality Control Report: Why is it Important? Bradley J. Austin, Mike Daniels and Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture FS-2017-04 October 2017 1

Laboratory Quality Control Report: Why is it Important? Bradley J. Austin, Mike Daniels, and Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture The Arkansas Water Resources Center (AWRC) maintains a fee-based water quality lab that is certified through the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The AWRC Water Quality Lab analyzes water samples for a variety of constituents, using standard methods for the analysis of water samples (APHA 2012). Whether you have one or several water samples tested, the lab generates a report of values for each parameter that you have analyzed, which is provided to the client. Included with every water quality report is a Lab Quality Control (QC) report for each of the parameters analyzed within the package. The Lab QC report provides important information about the performance of the methods used to test your water sample(s). What is Quality Control? Quality control consists of the lab techniques that demonstrate the precision or repeatability and accuracy of each specific analytical method; and in doing so, provides confidence that the values reported in your water quality report are correct. These techniques include incorporating blanks, standards, sample duplicates, and laboratory sample spikes into every group of samples analyzed at the Water Quality Lab. Below in table 1 you will find a list of terms that will be helpful in understanding the rest of this fact sheet. Analyte Term Concentration Method Detection Limit Reagent Grade Water Reporting Limit Sample Blank Standard Sample Digestion Sample Duplicate Sample Matrix Sample Spike Standard Definition This is the parameter of concern. This is the measure of the amount of analyte contained per unit of volume in your sample. Minimum concentration measured with 99% confidence that the true value is greater than zero (see fact sheet FS-2016-01). Water that is free of all analytes that your sample is being tested for. The lowest quantified level within an analytical methods operational range (see fact sheet FS-2016-01). This is a sample of reagent grade water. Blanks are used to assess for possible contamination. This is a sample that has a known concentration of the analyte that your water is being tested for. Standards are used to test for the accuracy of the method. Process by which all nitrogen and phosphorus in a sample are converted to nitrate and soulble reactive phosphorus, respectively. This is a re-analysis of your sample, and is used to determine the precision of the method. This is a sample with a known concentration of analyte added to it prior to lab processing and analysis. This is a sample with a known concentration of analyte added to it prior to lab processing and analysis. This is a sample that has a known concentration of the analyte that your water is being tested for. Standards are used to test for the accuracy of the method. 2

So, What is the Difference Between Accuracy and Precision? Accuracy of an analysis describes how close the measured values are to the true values. If you think about accuracy in the form of target shooting, having high accuracy means hitting the target as close to the bullseye as possible. Precision of an analysis describes how similar measured values are to each other, regardless of how accurate or inaccurate the analysis may be. Staying with the target analogy, having high precision means having a tight grouping of all of your shots. High Accuracy Low Precision Low Accuracy High Precision High Accuracy High Precision In order to provide you with the most reliable data possible, the goal for water quality lab is to be both as accurate and precise as possible. The different tables in the Lab QC Report allow you to see the labs performance with respect to accuracy and precision while testing the different parameters in your water sample Blank Data Table Sample blanks are used to look for possible sources of contamination to your sample from the collection of the sample to the analysis of your sample in the lab. There are several blanks listed below which are defined by what stage of sample processing they are included. Digested Blank: A digested blank is a sample of reagent grade water that goes through all the steps of sample preparation in the lab before the samples are analyzed. This blank is used to assess for possible contamination introduced during sample preparation activities. The AWRC Water Quality Lab only includes this blank when analyzing samples for total nitrogen and total phosphorus. Method Blank: The method blank is a sample of reagent grade water that is analyzed with your water samples. This blank is included to assess for possible contamination associated with the analytical instrumentation. Other water quality labs may refer to this blank as the Instrument Blank. Almost all AWRC Water Quality Lab analyses include a method blank. There is variability in every laboratory method and while a value of zero is preferred for blanks, the blanks reported in your lab QC report should be less than the reporting limit (APHA 2012). The reporting limit is the lowest quantified level within an analytical method; this value is specific to each analyte and can be found in the analytical report next to the value determined for your sample. Sample blanks are used to look for possible sources of contamination to your sample. 3

Standards Data Table As indicated earlier, the goal of the AWRC Water Quality Lab is to provide you with accurate data, or values as close to the true value as possible. Standards provide a way for the lab to have samples with a known concentration. Then by comparing the known concentration with the measured concentration the Lab can assess the accuracy of their measurement. There are three types of standards which may or may not be digested depending on the method. Calibration Standard: Calibration standards are incorporated throughout the sample run to verify that the analytical equipment s performance has not changed significantly since the initial calibration. Quality Control Standard (QCS): The QCS is made from stock solution different from that of the calibration standard and is used to help verify the accuracy of the calibration standard; this also helps verify the accuracy of the value(s) reported for your sample(s). Digested Standards: In analyses where your sample goes through a digestion process, such as total nitrogen and total phosphorus, both the calibration standards and QCS standards are also digested following the same process as your sample. This process helps assess the efficiency of the digestion method. For a sample run to be approved, the measured value of each of the standards analyzed must be no more than +/- 10% of the expected value. From the standpoint of the table provided in the Lab QC Report, both the lower and higher limits are listed to either side of the value obtained as a quick reference to whether or not the obtained values are acceptable. The percent recovery column describes the accuracy of the analysis and should be between 90 and 110% of the expected concentration. What this means with respect to your sample(s) is that if the method and analytical equipment are accurately measuring the standards to within +/- 10% of the expected value, then the same is true for your sample(s). Duplicate Data Table Sample duplicates are used to assess the repeatability or precision of sample collection and analysis procedures. For duplicates the lab analyzes your sample twice and the closer the two measured values are, the more precise the analysis is. Lab Duplicate: A lab duplicate is used to assess the precision of the laboratory methods and analytical equipment. Which sample is analyzed for the duplicate is chosen randomly throughout the full sample run, so in your Lab QC Report you may not likely find a duplicate data table for every parameter analyzed. Within the duplicate data table you will find the value measured the first time in the Result column followed by the value measured the second time in the Duplicate column. The last column of the table is labeled % RPD which stands for Relative Percent Difference. The %RPD is calculated as the absolute difference in the result and duplicate, divided by the average of the two values then multiplied by 100. When examining this value, the closer to zero the better as this indicates a high level of precision. Overall, a %RPD value of 30% or less should be viewed as acceptable. Samples with reported values below the reporting limit can produce greater variability, which may result in %RPD values much greater than 30%; but this does not mean that your data is not meaningful. %RPD = Result - Duplicate (Result + Duplicate)/2 x 100 4

Recovery Data Table The recovery data table shows results for sample spikes. The sample spike is used to evaluate analyte recovery in a sample matrix and is similar to a calibration or QC standard. The calibration and QC standards are made with a pure stock solution, so no chemical component of the stock solution should interfere with the analysis of the analyte of concern. However, this is not necessarily the case for actual water samples. Chemical constituents that occur in your water sample may influence the ability of the analytical instruments to accurately detect and measure the concentrations of the analyte of concern; this is known as a matrix effect. A laboratory sample spike can be used to detect a matrix effect. For the sample spike, calibration standard is added to a duplicate sample to achieve a known spike level, or increase in analyte concentration. Following the analysis the Result (value obtained from the un-altered sample) is compared to the Result+Spike spike (value of the sample spike). The % Recovery is calculated as the Result+Spike spike minus the Result, divided by the spike level, and then multiplied by 100. As with the standards the % Recovery should be no more than 110% and no less than 90%. Values outside this range might suggest other analytes in your water sample are creating a matrix effect and the reported value(s) should be viewed with caution. What is Quality Assurance? %RPD = Spike Result Spike Level x 100 Quality control is just part of the overall Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol. Quality Assurance refers to laboratory protocols that specify the measures that are taken by the lab personnel to produce defensible data with known precision and accuracy (APHA 2012). Essentially QA is the steps that the AWRC Water Quality Lab takes to ensure the values they report in your water quality analytical report are as close to the actual values as possible. Following the analysis of your water sample both the analytical and Lab QC reports are reviewed by two individuals. The first individual verifies that the numbers in the report were correctly entered in from the original analysis, and looks for errors in the analysis. The QA/QC Reviewer provides a second set of eyes to look over your water quality report to ensure that the data provided is accurate. 5

Literature Cited APHA (American Public Health Association). 2012. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (22nd edn.). American Public Health Association: Washington D.C. 1496 pp. Austin, B.J., J.T. Scott, M. Daniels, B.E. Haggard. 2016. Water Quality Reporting Limits, Method Detection Limits, and Censored Values: What Does it All Mean?. Arkansas Water Resources Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas, FS-2016-01: 8 pp. How to Cite This Fact Sheet Austin, B.J., M. Daniels, and B.E. Haggard. 2017. Laboratory Quality Control Report: Why is it Important?. Arkansas Water Resources Center, Fayetteville, AR, FS-2017-04: 06 pp. Arkansas Water Resources Center 479.575.4430 awrc@uark.edu College of Engineering 203 Engineering Hall University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 6