Sec$on Summary. Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Trivial & Vacuous Proofs Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs

Similar documents
Proofs of Mathema-cal Statements. A proof is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a statement.

Review. Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables. Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

With Question/Answer Animations. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

Proof Terminology. Technique #1: Direct Proof. Learning objectives. Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections ) Direct Proof:

Introduction to proofs. Niloufar Shafiei

Proofs. Introduction II. Notes. Notes. Notes. Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry. Fall 2007

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

Proofs: A General How To II. Rules of Inference. Rules of Inference Modus Ponens. Rules of Inference Addition. Rules of Inference Conjunction

Proofs. Joe Patten August 10, 2018

Chapter 1, Logic and Proofs (3) 1.6. Rules of Inference

MATH 135 Fall 2006 Proofs, Part IV

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall

Readings: Conjecture. Theorem. Rosen Section 1.5

1. Propositions: Contrapositives and Converses

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Section Summary. Proof by Cases Existence Proofs

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs

Normal Forms Note: all ppts about normal forms are skipped.

Disjunction/Conjunction Normal Form

Math 300 Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning Autumn 2017 Proof Templates 1

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

Homework 3: Solutions

Strategies for Proofs

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)

Some Review Problems for Exam 1: Solutions

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Lecture 2: Proof Techniques Lecturer: Lale Özkahya

First order Logic ( Predicate Logic) and Methods of Proof

Lecture 5 : Proofs DRAFT

Chapter 2 Section 2.1: Proofs Proof Techniques. CS 130 Discrete Structures

Ch 3.2: Direct proofs

Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.

MATH 271 Summer 2016 Practice problem solutions Week 1

CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS

Writing proofs for MATH 61CM, 61DM Week 1: basic logic, proof by contradiction, proof by induction

Discrete Mathematics

Chapter 1 Elementary Logic

Proof by Contradiction

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH WINTER

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH SPRING

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics. Introductory Notes in Discrete Mathematics Solution Guide

Meaning of Proof Methods of Proof

CHAPTER 1. MATHEMATICAL LOGIC 1.1 Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic

Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic

Mathematical Reasoning Rules of Inference & Mathematical Induction. 1. Assign propositional variables to the component propositional argument.

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

Proof. Theorems. Theorems. Example. Example. Example. Part 4. The Big Bang Theory

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Mat2345 Week 2. Chap 1.5, 1.6. Fall Mat2345 Week 2. Chap 1.5, 1.6. Week2. Negation. 1.5 Inference. Modus Ponens. Modus Tollens. Rules.

In 1854, Karl Weierstrauss gave an example of a continuous function which was nowhere di erentiable: cos(3 n x) 2 n. sin(3 n x), 2

1.1 Language and Logic

Handout on Logic, Axiomatic Methods, and Proofs MATH Spring David C. Royster UNC Charlotte

Predicate logic. G. Carl Evans. Summer University of Illinois. Propositional Logic Review Predicate logic Predicate Logic Examples

Example ( x.(p(x) Q(x))) ( x.p(x) x.q(x)) premise. 2. ( x.(p(x) Q(x))) -elim, 1 3. ( x.p(x) x.q(x)) -elim, x. P(x) x.

Discrete Mathematics Logics and Proofs. Liangfeng Zhang School of Information Science and Technology ShanghaiTech University

Direct Proof and Proof by Contrapositive

Mathematics 220 Midterm Practice problems from old exams Page 1 of 8

What is a proof? Proofing as a social process, a communication art.

Week 2. Week 1 Recap. Week 2

PROOFS IN MATHEMATICS

Definitions Chapter 1 Proof Technique (Pg.1): Proof (Pg.2): Statement (Pg.2): Conditional Statement/Implication (Pg3.): Hypothesis(Pg.

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Manual of Logical Style

Announcements. Problem Set 1 out. Checkpoint due Monday, September 30. Remaining problems due Friday, October 4.

Mathematical Induction. EECS 203: Discrete Mathematics Lecture 11 Spring

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Conjunction: p q is true if both p, q are true, and false if at least one of p, q is false. The truth table for conjunction is as follows.

- 1.2 Implication P. Danziger. Implication

Logic and Proofs 1. 1 Overview. 2 Sentential Connectives. John Nachbar Washington University December 26, 2014

The Process of Mathematical Proof

Lecture 7 Feb 4, 14. Sections 1.7 and 1.8 Some problems from Sec 1.8

Compound Propositions

What is Logic? Introduction to Logic. Simple Statements. Which one is statement?

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof

Basic Proof Examples

Discrete Mathematics Basic Proof Methods

EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers

Tools for reasoning: Logic. Ch. 1: Introduction to Propositional Logic Truth values, truth tables Boolean logic: Implications:

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

Section 1.1 Propositions

MAT2345 Discrete Math

Climbing an Infinite Ladder

MATH 215 Final. M4. For all a, b in Z, a b = b a.

Lecture 2. Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits. Reading (Epp s textbook)

Boolean Algebra and Proof. Notes. Proving Propositions. Propositional Equivalences. Notes. Notes. Notes. Notes. March 5, 2012

STUDY PROBLEMS FOR EXAM I CMSC 203 DISCRETE STRUCTURES. n (n +1)(2n +1), 6. j 2 = 1(1+1)(2 1+1) 6. k (k +1)(2k +1) 6

Contradiction MATH Contradiction. Benjamin V.C. Collins, James A. Swenson MATH 2730

Discrete Mathematics & Mathematical Reasoning Predicates, Quantifiers and Proof Techniques

3 The language of proof

Your quiz in recitation on Tuesday will cover 3.1: Arguments and inference. Your also have an online quiz, covering 3.1, due by 11:59 p.m., Tuesday.

COT 2104 Homework Assignment 1 (Answers)

Chapter III. Basic Proof Techniques. Proving the obvious has never been easy. Marty Rubin

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture 11: Proof Techniques David Mix Barrington 5 March 2013

Introduction to Basic Proof Techniques Mathew A. Johnson

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

Transcription:

Section 1.7

Sec$on Summary Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Trivial & Vacuous Proofs Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs Proof of the Contrapositive Proof by Contradiction 2

Proofs of Mathema$cal Statements A proof is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a statement. In math, CS, and other disciplines, informal proofs which are generally shorter, are generally used. More than one rule of inference are often used in a step. Steps may be skipped. The rules of inference used are not explicitly stated. Easier for to understand and to explain to people. But it is also easier to introduce errors. Proofs have many practical applications: verification that computer programs are correct establishing that operating systems are secure enabling programs to make inferences in artificial intelligence showing that system specifications are consistent 3

Defini$ons A conjecture is a statement that is being proposed to be true (it might be false!). Once a proof of a conjecture is found, it becomes a theorem. A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are known to be true) rules of inference A lemma is a helping theorem or a result which is needed to prove a theorem. A corollary is a result which follows directly from a theorem. Less important theorems are sometimes called propositions. 4

Forms of Theorems Many theorems assert that a property holds for all elements in a domain, such as the integers, the real numbers, or some of the discrete structures that we will study in this class. Often the universal quantifier (needed for a precise statement of a theorem) is omitted by standard mathematical convention. For example, the statement: If x > y, where x and y are positive real numbers, then x 2 > y 2 really means For all positive real numbers x and y, if x > y, then x 2 > y 2. 5

Proving Theorems Many theorems have the form: To prove them, we show that where c is an arbitrary element of the domain, By universal generalization the truth of the original formula follows. So, we must prove something of the form: 6

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Trivial Proof: If we know q is true, then p q is true as well. Ex: Prove If it is raining then 1=1. Since 1=1, the implication is true. Vacuous Proof: If we know p is false then p q is true as well. Ex: Prove If I am both rich and poor then 2+2 = 5. Since I can t be both rich and poor, the implication is true. [ Even though these examples seem silly, both trivial and vacuous proofs are often used in mathematical induction, as we will see in Ch. 5 ] 7

Even and Odd Integers Definition: The integer n is even if there exists an integer k such that n = 2k, and n is odd if there exists an integer k, such that n = 2k + 1. Note that every integer is either even or odd and no integer is both even and odd. We will need this basic fact about the integers in some of the example proofs to follow. 8

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Direct Proof: Assume that p is true. Use rules of inference, axioms, and logical equivalences to show that q must also be true. Ex: Give a direct proof of the theorem If n is an odd integer, then n 2 is odd. Solution: Assume that n is odd. Then n = 2k + 1 for an integer k. Squaring both sides of the equation, we get: n 2 = (2k + 1) 2 = 4k 2 + 4k +1 = 2(2k 2 + 2k) + 1= 2r + 1, where r = 2k 2 + 2k, an integer. We have proved that if n is an odd integer, then n 2 is an odd integer. ( marks the end of the proof. Sometimes QED is used instead. ) 9

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Definition: The real number r is rational if there exist integers p and q where q 0 such that r = p/q Ex: Prove that the sum of two rational numbers is rational. Solution: Assume r and s are two rational numbers. Then there must be integers p, q and also t, u such that Thus the sum is rational. where v = pu + qt w = qu 0 10

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Proof by Contraposition: Assume q and show p is true also. This is sometimes called an indirect proof method. If we give a direct proof of q p then we have a proof of p q. Why does this work? Ex: Prove that if n is an integer and 3n + 2 is odd, then n is odd. Solution: Assume by contraposition that n is even. So, n = 2k for some integer k. Thus 3n + 2 = 3(2k) + 2 =6k +2 = 2(3k + 1) = 2j for j = 3k +1 Therefore 3n + 2 is even. Since we have shown q p, p q must hold as well. If n is an integer and 3n + 2 is odd (not even), then n is odd (not even). 11

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Ex: Prove that for an integer n, if n 2 is odd, then n is odd. Solution: Use proof by contraposition. Assume n is even (i.e., not odd). Therefore, there exists an integer k such that n = 2k. Hence, n 2 = 4k 2 = 2 (2k 2 ) and n 2 is even(i.e., not odd). We have shown that if n is an even integer, then n 2 is even. Therefore by contraposition, for an integer n, if n 2 is odd, then n is odd. 12

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Proof by Contradiction: (AKA reductio ad absurdum). Assume the statement is false and derive a contradition. If the statement is p q, the negation of this statement is (p q). Assume p and q, then derive a contradiction such as r r. (an indirect form of proof). Since we have shown that q p F is true, it follows that the contrapositive T (p q) also holds. Ex: Prove that if you pick 22 days from the calendar, at least 4 must fall on the same day of the week. Solution: Assume by contradiction that you pick 22 days from the calendar and no more than 3 of the 22 days fall on the same day of the week. Because there are 7 days of the week, we could only have picked 21 days. This contradicts the assumption that we have picked 22 days. 13

Proving Condi$onal Statements: p q Ex: Prove that if n is an integer and 3n + 2 is odd, then n is odd. Solution: Assume by contradiction that n is even and 3n+2 is odd. So, n = 2k for some integer k. Thus 3n + 2 = 3(2k) + 2 =6k +2 = 2(3k + 1) = 2j for j = 3k +1 Therefore 3n + 2 is even. This contradicts our original assumption that 3n+2 is odd. 14

Theorems that are Bicondi$onal Statements To prove a theorem that is a biconditional statement (p q), show that p q and q p are both true. Ex: Prove An integer n is odd iff n 2 is odd. Solution: We have already shown (previous slides) that both p q and q p. Therefore we can conclude p q. Sometimes iff is used as an abbreviation for if an only if, as in If n is an integer, then n is odd iff n 2 is odd. 15

What is wrong with this? Proof that 1 = 2 Solution: Step 5. a - b = 0 by the premise and division by 0 is undewined. 16

Types of Proofs Summary How to prove the conditional statement p q: Trivial Proof (q is already known to be true) Vacuous Proof (p is already known to be false) Direct Proof Assume p is true. Show q is true. Proof by Contraposition (indirect) Assume q is true. Show p is true. Proof by Contradition (indirect) Assume the statement is false: q is true and p is true. Derive a contradiction, such as r r. 17

Tips for Wri$ng Proofs Rewrite statement in propositional logic. Ex: p q Determine the hypothesis (p) and consequence (q) First try a direct proof. If that doesn t work, try an indirect method. State proof method and assumptions. Example excerpts from proofs We use a direct proof and assume that (p) We prove the contraposition. Assume that ( q) Assume by contradiction that ( q) and (p) 18

Looking Ahead First try a direct proof. If direct methods of proof do not work: We may need a clever use of a proof by contraposition. Or a proof by contradiction. In the next section, we will see strategies that can be used when straightforward approaches do not work. In Ch. 5, we will see mathematical induction and related techniques. In Ch. 6, we will see combinatorial proofs 19