SUB-CHAPTER D.1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

Similar documents
«CALCULATION OF ISOTOPE BURN-UP AND CHANGE IN EFFICIENCY OF ABSORBING ELEMENTS OF WWER-1000 CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEM DURING BURN-UP».

APPLICATION OF THE COUPLED THREE DIMENSIONAL THERMAL- HYDRAULICS AND NEUTRON KINETICS MODELS TO PWR STEAM LINE BREAK ANALYSIS

Introduction to Reactivity and Reactor Control

Chem 481 Lecture Material 4/22/09

Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Original slides provided by Dr. Daniel Holland

Lesson 14: Reactivity Variations and Control

Advanced Heavy Water Reactor. Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA

Study of the End Flux Peaking for the CANDU Fuel Bundle Types by Transport Methods

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 5. Title: Reactor Kinetics and Reactor Operation

Reactivity Coefficients

CANDU Safety #3 - Nuclear Safety Characteristics Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing

Estimation of Control Rods Worth for WWR-S Research Reactor Using WIMS-D4 and CITATION Codes

EFFECT OF DISTRIBUTION OF VOLUMETRIC HEAT GENERATION ON MODERATOR TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION

DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH RESOLUTION X-RAY CT TECHNIQUE FOR IRRADIATED FUEL ASSEMBLY

Figure 22.1 Unflattened Flux Distribution

Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 ) 52 61

3. State each of the four types of inelastic collisions, giving an example of each (zaa type example is acceptable)

Comparison of Silicon Carbide and Zircaloy4 Cladding during LBLOCA

DOPPLER COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS FOR DIFFERENT ENRICHMENTS OF UO 2

The Effect of Burnup on Reactivity for VVER-1000 with MOXGD and UGD Fuel Assemblies Using MCNPX Code

Parametric Study of Control Rod Exposure for PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses

Study of boron dilution phenomenon in the core and fuel assemblies of Bushehr VVER-1000 reactor in normal operating conditions

Shutdown Margin. Xenon-Free Xenon removes neutrons from the life-cycle. So, xenonfree is the most reactive condition.

22.06 ENGINEERING OF NUCLEAR SYSTEMS OPEN BOOK FINAL EXAM 3 HOURS

Users manual of CBZ/FRBurnerRZ: A module for fast reactor core design

Lecture 27 Reactor Kinetics-III

Step 2: Calculate the total amount of U-238 present at time=0. Step 4: Calculate the rate constant for the decay process.

Idaho National Laboratory Reactor Analysis Applications of the Serpent Lattice Physics Code

USA HTR NEUTRONIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SAFARI-1 MATERIAL TESTING REACTOR

ULOF Accident Analysis for 300 MWt Pb-Bi Coolled MOX Fuelled SPINNOR Reactor

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering

The Dynamical Loading of the WWER440/V213 Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals during LOCA Accident in Hot and Cold Leg of the Primary Circuit

PWR CONTROL ROD EJECTION ANALYSIS WITH THE MOC CODE DECART

Chapter 7 & 8 Control Rods Fission Product Poisons. Ryan Schow

17 Neutron Life Cycle

NEW FUEL IN MARIA RESEARCH REACTOR, PROVIDING BETTER CONDITIONS FOR IRRADIATION IN THE FAST NEUTRON SPECTRUM.

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 )

Steady-State and Transient Neutronic and Thermal-hydraulic Analysis of ETDR using the FAST code system

Systems Analysis of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle CASMO-4 1. CASMO-4

NEUTRONIC ANALYSIS STUDIES OF THE SPALLATION TARGET WINDOW FOR A GAS COOLED ADS CONCEPT.

Impact of the Hypothetical RCCA Rodlet Separation on the Nuclear Parameters of the NPP Krško core

REFLECTOR FEEDBACK COEFFICIENT: NEUTRONIC CONSIDERATIONS IN MTR-TYPE RESEARCH REACTORS ABSTRACT

Research Article Calculations for a BWR Lattice with Adjacent Gadolinium Pins Using the Monte Carlo Cell Code Serpent v.1.1.7

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 REACTIVITY EFFECTS DUE TO TEMPERATURE CHANGES

2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting September 10 (Sun) ~ 14 (Thu), 2017 Ramada Plaza Jeju Jeju Island, Korea

Sensitivity Analysis of Gas-cooled Fast Reactor

LECTURE 4: CORE DESIGN ANALYSIS

MA/LLFP Transmutation Experiment Options in the Future Monju Core

Neutronic Calculations of Ghana Research Reactor-1 LEU Core

Fuel Element Burnup Determination in HEU - LEU Mixed TRIGA Research Reactor Core

MONTE CALRLO MODELLING OF VOID COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY EXPERIMENT

JOYO MK-III Performance Test at Low Power and Its Analysis

Development of 3D Space Time Kinetics Model for Coupled Neutron Kinetics and Thermal hydraulics

ADVANCED PLUTONIUM PWR FUEL ASSEMBLIES R&D IN FRANCE. D. Warin, JC. Gauthier, L. Brunel, JL. Guillet

CALCULATION OF TEMPERATURE REACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS IN KRITZ-2 CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS USING WIMS ABSTRACT

A PWR HOT-ROD MODEL: RELAP5/MOD3.2.2Y AS A SUBCHANNEL CODE I.C. KIRSTEN (1), G.R. KIMBER (2), R. PAGE (3), J.R. JONES (1) ABSTRACT

Study of Control rod worth in the TMSR

Coupling of thermal-mechanics and thermalhydraulics codes for the hot channel analysis of RIA events First steps in AEKI toward multiphysics

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 6

Study of Burnup Reactivity and Isotopic Inventories in REBUS Program

REACTOR PHYSICS ASPECTS OF PLUTONIUM RECYCLING IN PWRs

Research Article Analysis of NEA-NSC PWR Uncontrolled Control Rod Withdrawal at Zero Power Benchmark Cases with NODAL3 Code

The moderator temperature coefficient MTC is defined as the change in reactivity per degree change in moderator temperature.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ALLEGRO MOX CORE. Bratislava, Iľkovičova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia

Neutron reproduction. factor ε. k eff = Neutron Life Cycle. x η

Operational Reactor Safety

ENGINEERING OF NUCLEAR REACTORS. Fall December 17, 2002 OPEN BOOK FINAL EXAM 3 HOURS

Reactor Kinetics and Operation

(1) SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium (2) Belgonucléaire, Av. Arianelaan 4, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium

DEVELOPMENT OF A COUPLED CODE SYSTEM BASED ON SPACE SAFETY ANALYSIS CODE AND RAST-K THREE-DIMENSIONAL NEUTRONICS CODE

ANALYSIS OF THE OECD PEACH BOTTOM TURBINE TRIP 2 TRANSIENT BENCHMARK WITH THE COUPLED NEUTRONIC AND THERMAL-HYDRAULICS CODE TRAC-M/PARCS

20.1 Xenon Production Xe-135 is produced directly in only 0.3% of all U-235 fissions. The following example is typical:

Institute of Atomic Energy POLATOM OTWOCK-SWIERK POLAND. Irradiations of HEU targets in MARIA RR for Mo-99 production. G.

Simulating the Behaviour of the Fast Reactor JOYO

A Dummy Core for V&V and Education & Training Purposes at TechnicAtome: In and Ex-Core Calculations

XV. Fission Product Poisoning

MIT: Akshay Dave, Lin-wen Hu, Kaichao Sun INL: Ryan Marlow, Paul Murray, Joseph Nielsen. Nuclear Reactor Laboratory

The Lead-Based VENUS-F Facility: Status of the FREYA Project

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 4. Title: Control Rods and Sub-critical Systems

Reactivity Coefficients

Challenges in Prismatic HTR Reactor Physics

Safety Analysis of Loss of Flow Transients in a Typical Research Reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.3

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 NEUTRON FLUX DISTRI~UTION

Instability Analysis in Peach Bottom NPP Using a Whole Core Thermalhydraulic-Neutronic Model with RELAP5/PARCS v2.7

Power Installations based on Activated Nuclear Reactions of Fission and Synthesis

Improvement of Critical Heat Flux Performance by Wire Spacer

English text only NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR SCIENCE COMMITTEE

AN OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR ENERGY. Prof. Mushtaq Ahmad, MS, PhD, MIT, USA

X. Neutron and Power Distribution

Neutronic Issues and Ways to Resolve Them. P.A. Fomichenko National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Yu.P. Sukharev JSC Afrikantov OKBM,

VERIFICATION OF A REACTOR PHYSICS CALCULATION SCHEME FOR THE CROCUS REACTOR. Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) CH-5232 Villigen-PSI 2

Research Article Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Void Reactivity Feedback for 3D BWR Assembly Model

Study on SiC Components to Improve the Neutron Economy in HTGR

Dynamic Analysis on the Safety Criteria of the Conceptual Core Design in MTR-type Research Reactor

Title: Development of a multi-physics, multi-scale coupled simulation system for LWR safety analysis

Reactivity Effect of Fission and Absorption

Subcritical Multiplication and Reactor Startup

THORIUM SELF-SUFFICIENT FUEL CYCLE OF CANDU POWER REACTOR

Cost Analtsis for a Nuclear Power Plant with Standby Redundant Reactor Vessel

Transcription:

PAGE : 1 / 12 CHAPTER D. REACTOR AND CORE SUB-CHAPTER D.1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Chapter D describes the nuclear, hydraulic and thermal characteristics of the reactor, the proposals made at the present stage of the EPR design with regard to the mechanical characteristics of the fuel assemblies, and the objectives of the nuclear and of the thermalhydraulic designs. 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE CORE AND FUEL ASSEMBLIES The reactor core contains fuel material where the fission reaction, which produces energy occurs. All the core equipment is used either to physically support the fissile material, to control the fission reaction or to channel the coolant. The reactor core consists of a specified number of fuel rods which are held in bundles by spacer grids and top and bottom fittings. The fuel rods consist of uranium or MOX (uranium plus plutonium) pellets stacked in a cladding tube plugged and seal welded to encapsulate the fuel. The bundles, known as fuel assemblies, are arranged in a pattern which approximates to a circular cylinder. Each fuel assembly is formed by a 17 x 17 array, made up of 265 fuel rods and 24 guide thimbles. The 24 non-fuel rod positions in the array are equipped with guide thimbles joined to the grids and the top and bottom nozzles. The guide thimbles are used as core locations for rod cluster control assemblies, for neutron source rods and internal instrumentation or they are fitted with plugging devices to limit the bypass flow. The grid assemblies consist of an "egg-crate" arrangement of interlocked straps. The straps contain spring fingers and dimples for fuel rod support as well as coolant mixing fins. At the present stage of the EPR design, the exemplary initial core consists of 241 assemblies organised into 3 regions with different enrichments. For future reloads, the number and the characteristics of the fresh assemblies depend on the type of the fuel management foreseen, i.e., cycle length, type of loading, MOX core, etc. Fuel cycle lengths of 22 and 18 months, IN/OUT fuel management types uranium and MOX fuel are possible and may be used with the core described herein. The core is cooled and moderated with light water at a pressure of 155 bar in the primary coolant system.

PAGE : 2 / 12 2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE REACTIVITY CONTROL METHOD The moderator coolant contains soluble boron as a neutron poison. The boron concentration in the coolant is varied as required to control relatively slow reactivity changes including the effects of fuel burnup. Additional neutron poison (Gadolinium), in the form of commixed burnable poisoned rods, is used to establish the required initial reactivity and power distribution. The core reactivity and the core power distribution are also controlled by movable control rods consisting of absorber rods that allow the performance of rapid reactivity variations. Each control rod assembly consists of a group of individual absorber rods fastened at the top end to a common hub or spider assembly. The control rod assemblies are arranged in several groups. The control rod drive mechanisms RGL [CRDM] are used to insert, hold or withdraw the control rods. They consist of electromechanical devices fixed to the reactor vessel cap. They are used to change the control rod assembly position and to ensure reactor trip by gravity drop. The control rod gravity drop is obtained by cutting off electrical supplies to the RGL [CRDM] 3. OBJECTIVE OF NUCLEAR AND THERMO-HYDRAULIC DESIGN ANALYSES The nuclear design analyses and calculations establish physical locations for control rods, burnable poison rods, and physical parameters such as fuel enrichments and boron concentration in the coolant. The nuclear design evaluation confirms that the reactor core has inherent characteristics which, together with corrective actions of the reactor control and protective systems, provide adequate reactivity control even if the highest reactivity worth control rod assembly is stuck in the fully withdrawn position. The design also provides for inherent stability against diametrical or radial and axial power oscillations and for control of induced axial power oscillation through the use of control rods. The thermal-hydraulic design analyses and calculations establish coolant flow parameters which ensure that adequate heat transfer is provided between the fuel cladding and the reactor coolant. The thermal design takes into account local variations in dimensions, power generation, flow distribution, and mixing. The mixing fins incorporated in the fuel assembly spacer grid design induce additional flow mixing between the various flow channels within a fuel assembly as well as between adjacent assemblies. Instrumentation is provided in and out of the core to monitor the nuclear, thermal-hydraulic, and mechanical performance of the reactor and to provide inputs to automatic control functions.

PAGE : 3 / 12 4. COMPILATION OF MAIN DATA The main reactor nuclear, thermalhydraulic and mechanical design parameters are presented in 4.1 D.1 TAB 1. 5. DESIGN TOOLS AND METHODS The analytical techniques used in the core design are presented in table D.1 TAB 2.

PAGE : 4 / 12 TAB 1 : REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS 1 A - Thermal and hydraulic design parameters: 1 - Reactor core heat output (100 %) (MWth) 4500 2 - Number of loops 4 3 - Heat generated in fuel (%) 97.4 4 - Nominal system pressure (bar) 155 5 - DNB predictor FC-CHF 2 Correlation 6 - Minimum DNBR under nominal operating conditions (F H = 1.61 - cos 1.45) 7 - Minimum initial DNBR for the Basic Design transient analyses 2.6 see Chapter P B - Coolant flow: 8 - Thermal design flowrate/loop (m³/h) 27195 9 - Core bypass flowrate (%) 5.50 10 - Core flow area for heat transfer (m²) 5.9 11 - Average velocity along fuel rods (m/s) 4.8 12 - Core average mass velocity (g/cm².s) 356 1 The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C) 2 Critical Heat Flux

PAGE : 5 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS C - Coolant temperature: 13 - Nominal inlet ( C) 295.7 14 - Average rise in vessel ( C) 34.2 15 - Average rise in core ( C) 36.0 16 - Average in core ( C) 313.7 17 - Average in vessel ( C) 312.8 D - Heat transfer: 18 - Heat transfer surface area (m²) 8005 19 - Average core heat flux (W/cm²) 54.7 20 - Maximum core heat flux (nominal operation) (W/cm²) 157.3 21 - Average linear power density (based on cold dimensions) (W/cm) 163.4 22 - Peak linear power for normal operating conditions (W/cm) 470 23 - Peak linear power protection setpoint (W/cm) 590 24 - Peak linear power for prevention of centreline melt (W/cm) > 590 25 - Power density in hot conditions (KW/core litre) 94.6

PAGE : 6 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS E - Vessel and core pressure losses: 26 - Reactor vessel (bar): 1.66 27 - Core (bar): 2.55 F - Fuel assemblies (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)): 28 - Rod array 17 x 17 29 - Number of fuel assemblies 241 30 - Rods per assembly 265 31 - Fuel assembly pitch (cm) 21.504 32 - Fuel assembly length without hold-down spring (cm) 480 33 - Lattice rod pitch (cm) 1.26 34 - Overall transverse dimensions (cm) 21.4 x 21.4 35 - Fuel weight per assembly (kg) 598 UO 2, 527.5 U 36 - Number of grids per assembly 10 37 - Composition of grids Zircaloy & Inconel 38 -Number of guide thimbles per assembly 24 39 -Number of instrumentation thimbles per assembly 0

PAGE : 7 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS G - Fuel rods (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)) 40 - Number 63865 41 - Outside diameter (mm) 9.50 42 - Diametral gap (mm) 0.17 43 - Clad thickness (mm) 0.57 44 - Clad material M5 H - Fuel pellet (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)): 45 - Material UO 2 or MOX 46 - UO 2 density (% of the theoretical density) 95 47 - UO 2 + PuO 2 density (% of the theoretical density) 94.5 48 - Diameter (mm) 8.19

PAGE : 8 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS I - Rod cluster control assemblies (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)): 49 - Absorber: 1) AIC part (lower part) Composition (% wt): Ag In Cd Density (g/cm³) Absorber outer diameter (mm) Length (mm) 80 15 5 10.17 7.65 1500 2) B4C part (upper part) Composition: natural boron (19.9 atoms of percent B10) Density (g/cm³) Absorber diameter (mm) Length (mm) 1.79 7.47 2610 50 - Cladding: Outer diameter (mm) Inner diameter (mm) Thickness (mm) Material 51 - Number of clusters, full length 9.68 7.72 0.98 Stainless steel 89 52 - Number of absorber rods per cluster 24

PAGE : 9 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS J - Active core (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)) : 53 - Equivalent diameter (mm) 3767 54 - Core average active fuel height (mm) 4200 55 - Height-to-diameter ratio 1.115 56 - Total cross-section area (cm²) 111 440 K - Heavy, radial reflector (The sizes are given in cold conditions (20 C)): 57 - Thickness (mm) 58 - Composition (% volume) Between 77 and 297 (average 194) Roughly 95 % steel, 4 % water

PAGE : 10 / 12 REACTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS L - Fuel enrichment: For UO2 fuel assemblies (% wt): 59 - Region 1 of cycle 1 2.1 % 60 - Region 2 of cycle 1 3.2 % 61 - Region 3 of cycle 1 4.2% 62 - Fresh assemblies for UO 2 - INOUT - 18 months 5.0 % 63 - Fresh assemblies for UO 2 - INOUT - 22 months 5.0 % For MOX fuel assemblies (% wt) 3 : 64 - Maximum fissile Pu enrichment for the zone 1 7.44 % 1) 65 - Middle fissile Pu enrichment for the zone 2 6.44 % 1) 66 - Minimum fissile Pu enrichment for the zone 3 3.44 % 1) 67 - Average fissile Pu enrichment 7.0 % 1) 68 - Assumption for UO 2 enrichment in MOX fuel (% U235 wt) 0.2 % 1) M - Pu vector for MOX fuel assemblies: Issued of a UO 2 fuel burned up to 60 GWd/t (% wt): 3 The fissile Pu enrichments is defined as e = Pu239 + Pu241 (U + Pu + Am)

PAGE : 11 / 12 69 - Pu 238 4.0 70 - Pu 239 50.0 71 - Pu 240 23.0 72 - Pu 241 12.0 73 - Pu 242 9.5 74 - Am 241 1.5

PAGE : 12 / 12 TAB 2 : ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES IN CORE DESIGN ANALYSIS 1 - Nuclear design TECHNIQUE COMPUTER CODE - Cross sections and group constants Macroscopic data APOLLO 2 - Power distributions, fuel burnup critical boron concentration, xenon distributions, reactivity coefficients, rod worths. 3-D, 2-group, diffusion evolution theory SMART 2 - Thermal - Hydraulic design Subchannel analysis of local fluid conditions (treatment performed for the core, the assembly and the hot channel) FLICA