Design of Beam Halo Monitor for CMS

Similar documents
Performance of New and Upgraded Detectors for Luminosity and Beam Condition Measurement at CMS

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Feasibility study of a Fused Quartz detector for measuring the Machine Induced Background in the CMS Cavern

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

PoS(HQL 2012)021. The LHCb upgrade. Tomasz Szumlak 1

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

Equalisation of the PMT response to charge particles for the Lucid detector of the ATLAS experiment

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

Physics motivations and expected performance of the CMS muon system upgrade with triple-gem detectors

Luminosity measurements and diffractive physics in ATLAS

PoS(DIS 2010)190. Diboson production at CMS

The Fast Interaction Trigger Upgrade for ALICE

Theory English (Official)

Beam diagnostics: Alignment of the beam to prevent for activation. Accelerator physics: using these sensitive particle detectors.

ASPECTS OF MACHINE INDUCED BACKGROUND IN THE LHC EXPERIMENTS

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

A gas-filled calorimeter for high intensity beam environments

PoS(PD07)020. Timing Properties of MCP-PMT. Kenji Inami. Nagoya university, Nagoya, Japan

Detecting. Particles

Cavern background measurement with the ATLAS RPC system

Module of Silicon Photomultipliers as a single photon detector of Cherenkov photons

Study of high muon multiplicity cosmic-ray events with ALICE at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Tracking properties of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

ATLAS New Small Wheel Phase I Upgrade: Detector and Electronics Performance Analysis

Performance of the ALICE Muon Trigger system in Pb Pb collisions

MDI and detector modeling

Correction for PMT temperature dependence of the LHCf calorimeters

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE DIRC FUSED SILICA CHERENKOV RADIATOR

ALICE A Large Ion Collider Experiment

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

Results from combined CMS-TOTEM data

FLUKA studies on the radiation in the Point 5 Q6-Q7 area: Roman Pots, TCL6 and RR

RICH detectors for LHCb

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

Performance and calibration of CASTOR calorimeter at CMS

2.24 Simulation Study of K L Beam: K L Rates and Background Ilya Larin Department of Physics Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529, U.S.A.

CMS ECAL status and performance with the first LHC collisions

Radiation damage in diamond sensors at the CMS experiment of the LHC

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Luminosity determination in pp collisions using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The milliqan Experiment: Search for milli-charged Particles at the LHC (proceeding for ICHEP 2018 )

Physics studies to define the CMS muon detector upgrade for High-Luminosity LHC

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)508. CMS Detector: Performance Results. Speaker. I. Redondo * CIEMAT

Cherenkov Detectors in Particle Physics. Brad Wogsland University of Tennessee

Project P2 - The weak charge of the proton

Beam-induced radiation in the compact muon solenoid tracker at the Large Hadron Collider

Particle Identification at a super B Factory. FRASCATI WORKSHOP DISCUSSION ON PID

Lecture LHC How to measure cross sections...

A Triple-GEM Telescope for the TOTEM Experiment

János Sziklai. WIGNER RCP On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:

TOTEM Update BSM? Fredrik Oljemark (Helsinki Univ. & HIP) On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Jyväskylä, TOTEM p. 1

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A

Upgrade plans for the ATLAS Forward Calorimeter at the HL-LHC

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Calibration and Monitoring Systems

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Commissioning and Calibration of the Zero Degree Calorimeters for the ALICE experiment

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Operation and Performance of the LHCb experiment

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

The low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter at the JLab EIC

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

A RICH Photon Detector Module with G-APDs

Hands on Project: Large Photocathode PMT Characterization

October 4, :33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1. Chapter 1. Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS

GasToF: Picosecond Resolution Time of Flight Detector

Polycrystalline CdTe Detectors: A Luminosity Monitor for the LHC

LHCb Semileptonic Asymmetry

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Dec 2018 Fast Interaction Trigger for the upgrade of the ALICE experiment at CERN: design and performance

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

CMS Phase-II Upgrade of the Muon System (irpc)

Simulation and validation of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter response

Preliminary Design of m + m - Higgs Factory Machine-Detector Interface

Research and Development for the ATLAS Forward Calorimetry at the Phase-II LHC

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

H4IRRAD generic simulation results

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

Neutrons for Science (NFS) at SPIRAL-2

PoS(Vertex 2016)004. ATLAS IBL operational experience

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC era

Neutron flux measurement using fast-neutron activation of 12 B and 12 N isotopes in hydrocarbonate scintillators

Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC

Muon to Electron Conversion: Experimental Status in Japan and the US

Big, Fast, and Cheap: Precision Timing in the Next Generation of Cherenkov Detectors LAPPD Collaboration Meeting 2010

Performance of a triple-gem detector for high-rate particle triggering

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Transcription:

1 CERN Geneva, Switzerland National Technical University of Athens Athens, Greece E-mail: styliani.orfanelli@cern.ch Anne Dabrowski, Rob Loos CERN Geneva, Switzerland E-mail: anne.evelyn.dabrowski@cern.ch, robert.loos@cern.ch Fabrizio Fabbri, Alessandro Montanari, Nicolo Tosi INFN Bologna, Italy E-mail: fabrizio.fabbri@bo.infn.it, montanari@bo.infn.it, nicolo.tosi@cern.ch Alexey Finkel, Roger Rusack University of Minnesota Minnesota, USA E-mail: alexey.finkel@cern.ch, rusack@physics.umn.edu David P. Stickland Princeton University Princeton, USA E-mail: david.sticklan@cern.ch 1 Speaker Also at University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it

A fast and directional monitoring system for the CMS experiment is designed to provide an online, bunch-by-bunch measurement of beam background induced by beam halo interactions, separately for each beam. The background detection is based on Cherenkov radiation produced in synthetic fused silica read out by a fast, UV sensitive photomultiplier tube. Twenty detector units per end will be azimuthally distributed around the rotating shielding of CMS, covering ~408 cm at 0.6m from the interaction point, at a radius of ~180 cm. The directional and fast response of the system allows the discrimination of the background particles from the dominant flux in the cavern induced by pp collision debris, produced within the 5 ns bunch spacing. A robust multi-layered shielding will enclose each detector unit to protect the photomultiplier tube from the magnetic field and to eliminate the occupancy from low energy particles. The design of the front-end units is validated by experimental results. An overview of the new system to be integrated in CMS during the current shutdown of LHC will be presented, and its perspective for monitoring in High Luminosity LHC. Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 014-6 June, 014 Amsterdam, the Netherlands Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it

1. Introduction Monitoring of beam conditions is essential for high quality physics data-taking in CMS experiment. In 015 the LHC will operate with as higher beam intensity, tighter collimator settings and exceeding nominal luminosity, which shall increase the potential of the Machine Induced Background (MIB) from LHC, i.e. products of secondary cascades, initiated by proton losses around LHC. A novel Beam Halo Monitoring system has been designed to provide an online bunch-by-bunch measurement of MIB arriving CMS at high radius (~1.8 m from beam axis), separately for the two beams. The system is an array of fast, directional Cherenkov detectors that will be distributed azimuthally outside the rotating shielding of CMS, 0.65 m from the interaction point (IP), and will flag at real-time adverse beam conditions to CMS and LHC, complementing the measurement by the diamond-sensor based BCM1F system at lower radius and closer to the IP.. Principles of Machine Induced Background detection CMS radiation environment and the need of suppression the vast flux of particles produced from pp collisions, arriving at the opposite direction of the MIB and dominating in CMS cavern, set the primary constraints of the BHM design. The key features of this system are the choice of location that allows the use of time-of-flight techniques and the prompt and directional nature of Cherenkov light..1 Golden timing location Golden locations are the locations in the CMS cavern, where the MIB would arrive with a maximum time separation from the collision products. For the 5ns bunch spacing this corresponds to 1.5ns (see Fig.1, left). The 6th golden location, at 0.65 m from CMS IP, outside the rotating shielding (see Fig. 1, right) is the most appropriate to install BHM. It is easily accessible in CMS cavern, with space availability, less ferocious environmental conditions i.e. radiation levels and magnetic field and increased ratio of MIB over the pp products flux with respect to the other golden locations. Figure 1. Time separation in Golden Locations (left). Golden location 6 (yellow arrow) (right).. Properties of Machine Induced Background at Golden Location 6 BHM will be mostly sensitive to beam background muons, so-called Beam Halo Muons, which are a result of proton interactions at the beam collimators. Based on FLUKA simulations 3

for nominal LHC the beam halo muons arriving at the BHM location have a mean energy of - 0 GeV, arrive parallel with the incoming beam and are concentrated in angle. The MIB flux is estimated to be O(Hz/cm ). The respective distribution of energy and angle of pp muons (products of pp collisions) shows that they arrive straight from the IP, in the opposite direction of MIB (180 difference). The pp-muon flux is three orders of magnitude larger than the MIB muon flux, meaning that the BHM unit has to suppress the signal produced by muons arriving from the CMS side and not the tunnel to 0.1%. Polar angle wrt incoming beam[deg] 180 160 140 10 0 80 60 40 0 0 Angular & Energy Distribution of MIB muons -1 1 Mean x 17.88 Mean y.571 Integral 0.393 3 4 Energy[GeV] - -3-4 /sec] Flux [/cm Polar angle wrt incoming beam[deg] 180 160 140 10 0 80 60 40 0 0 Angular & Energy Distribution of PP muons -1 1 Mean x 1.586 Mean y 175.7 Integral 189.4 3 4 Energy[GeV] Figure. Energy and angular distributions of MIB (left) and pp (right) muons at Golden Location 6..3 Cherenkov radiation Cherenkov radiation fulfills all the requirements of BHM system and it is the technology behind this novel detector. Cherenkov light is prompt and enables the measurement within the 1.5ns time window for the MIB measurement. It is directional, which allows the discrimination of the direction of the particles based on the difference on the light yield produced. What is more, it is produced only by charged particles making BHM insensitive to any neutron or photons of the CMS cavern. The radiator material is synthetically fused quartz, which is radiation hard for at least 0 krad (Fig. 3). 1-1 /sec] Flux [/cm Figure 3. Transmission coefficient of silicon based material before and after irradiation of 0krad. 3. Detector Unit A BHM detector unit is shown in Figure 4: a cm synthetically fused quartz bar blackpainted on the front side of 5.1 cm diameter, 1 mm optical coupling RTV1345, a fast photomultiplier R059 Hamamatsu of 5.1 cm diameter, triple layer magnetic shielding made of 0.6 mm permalloy, 1 mm μ metal and 1 cm thick ARMCO soft iron box. The iron shielding serves as a protection of the PMT from the 17 mt residual magnetic field and from low energy e-/e+ produced by pp collisions, arriving at the same direction with the MIB. 4

Design of Beam Halo Monitor for CMS Figure 4. The quartz bar optically coupled to R059 (left). BHM detector unit sketch (right). 4. Directionality and Timing performance during test beams #events' FWHM[ns]' Figure 5. Test-beam setup: BHM unit stands on a rotating base, allowing the measurement of signal from particles arriving from different angles (left). FWHM ~3.1ns of BHM signal during test-beam (right). Amplitude%[V]% To benefit from the placement at the golden location the signal needs to be faster than ns. Figure 5 (right) shows the fast timing distribution of the signal during a test beam in T9 CERN July 01 equal to ~3.1ns, which is faster than the required 1.5 ns. Forward% signal% Backward% signal% Time%[ns]% Figure 6. Signal produced from a particle arriving from the front/back side of the BHM unit (left/right). Directionality is the property of the detector to distinguish particles coming from different directions and is used to suppress background signal while selecting particles parallel and consistent with the direction of the incoming beam. During test-beams it was validated that the suppression of the backward signal to 1 over 00 is achievable; by setting a discrimination voltage, e.g. 4.8V in fig. 5, ~90% of the forward signal is accepted, while the backward signal acceptance is suppressed to O(-4). 5 The performance of the timing and the directional properties of the BHM detector unit has been tested during test beams (Figure 5, left).

Figure 7. Normal (left) and cumulative (right) amplitude distributions from test beam data. 5. System overview Each detector unit is based on 51mm diameter quartz bars (cross section of 0.4cm ), while the MIB rate is O(Hz/cm ) in good LHC conditions. For a rate of ~1 MIB hit/bunch crossing, an acceptance of ~400cm is needed, meaning that 0 units per end are required. They will be azimuthally distributed around the rotating shielding, with overlapping acceptance with the CSC chambers and placed completely parallel to the beam axis with the front face towards the tunnel. Figure 8. The azimuthal distribution of ten BHM detector units around the CMS rotating shielding. 6. HL-LHC era Beam losses, being proportional to the luminosity, should result on an increase of beam halo muons creation at the collimators (five times the nominal L) for HL-LHC. Tighter collimator settings will be another reason for increased MIB. The pile up for HL-LHC is expected to be ~140 - five times more than the nominal- resulting the conservation of the MIB over pp ratio. That means that BHM will be fully operational for HL-LHC and shall not be affected by the ferocious environment of HL-LHC. 7. Summary A new Cherenkov-based MIB monitoring system has been designed and will be installed during LS1. Twenty channels per end will be azimuthally distributed around CMS rotating shielding. The system has a response of 3.1ns and is able to distinguish MIB from pp based on time of arrival. Suppression of the signal produced from backward particles is suppressed by directionality to 0.1%. The detector unit is based on synthetically fused silica, R059 Hamamatsu PMT and a triple layer of shielding to suppress collision induced background signal and the residual magnetic field. The system performance has been verified during test beams. The system is designed for the CMS radiation environment and will survive at that location for >3000fb -1, being fully functional for HL-LHC. 6