Nov. 20, 1973 U. NEUMANN 3,773,902. PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF POTASSIUM CARBONATE HYDRATE Filed May 26, 1971

Similar documents
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

United States Patent (19)

: X''' gy? î. * March 21, 1967 L. H. COOK ETA 3,310, ß. Filled Sept. 9, 1963 PROCESS FOR COMBINED PRODUCTION OF AMMONIA AND UREA

BY ye; v P. April 29, 1969 C. S. KELLEY 3,441,626. TEMPERATURE CONTROL of EXOTHERMIC REACTIONS Filed March 6, 1967 INVENTOR. PRODUCT C. S.

June 9, R. C. DATIN ETAL SYNTHESIS OF NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE Filed Jan. 7, ,136,821

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

United States Patent (19) Sakowski et al.

United States Patent (19) Gudmundsen et al.

(30) Foreign Application Priority Data Jan. 21, 1975 Italy (5) Int. Cl... CO1C 1/ /239.3 P, A

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: B01D 9/00 ( )

United States Patent (19) (11) 4,390,512 Loehr et al. l (45) Jun. 28, 1983

Sept. 5, 1972 HidEO FURUKAWA ET AL 3,689,37 SEPARATING CLOSE BOILING, TWO COMPONENT MIXTURE BY DISTILLING IN PRESENCE OF SELECTIVE THIRD COMPONENT

United States Patent (19)

(51) Int. Cl... D06F tank. The liquid level detector includes a first resistance

United States Patent (19)

Lecture 25: Manufacture of Maleic Anhydride and DDT

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

July 11, ,330,864 K. P. BELLINGER METHOD FOR MAKING UREA NITRATE. Filed April 29, 1965 ;---- INVENTOR. KENNETH. P. BELLINGER ATTORNEY

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

United States Patent (19) Mix

M7Mae /2 roy t?a Hav. /nventors Ace-air /fo/ee. July 6, 1971 E. MOLLER ETAL 3,591,490. Filed Nov. 14, 1969

United States Patent (19) Sumikawa et al.

United States Patent (19) Needham et al.

Filed: Jun. 1, 1981 Int. Cl... CO1B 11/06 U.S. C /474. 2,441,337 5/1948 Sprauer /474 2,469,901 5/1949 Sprauer...

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2012/19

Espacenet Bibliographic data: DE (A1)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,229,054 B1. Dai et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 8, THEREFOR 3,644,534 2/1972 Reabe.

Ways to Improve the Energy Efficiency of AN Solution Plants

2 5 t/ 2 weams suicidity itains

'" is "s" 165,443 3/1965 U.S.S.R. 260/531

United States Patent (19)

Mathis. 58) Field of Search /603 56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 2,826,610 3/1958 Morris et al /603

Structure of the chemical industry

CHLORINE RECOVERY FROM HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,337,059 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7825,066 B1

"All-4-4 / daysza///zer. Oct. 13, G. S. SiM PSON 2,057,119. Mo/her A/zoor. Mozaera/zoo/ 6eorye S 5/7 as or. Filed Aug. 9,

United States Patent (19)

He'? United States Patent (19) Foer. 11) Patent Number: 4,595,469 (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 17, 1986 NOOH /6. PRODUCT NaCl + H2O FEED (54)

United States Patent (113,554,265

III. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,143,451 (45. Date of Patent: Sep. 1, Millgard

United States Patent (19) Scremin et al.

United States Patent (19) Lin et al.

Apparatus and Method for the Electrolysis of Water Employing a Sulfonated Solid Polymer Electrolyte

(51) Int. Cl."... C07C 209/00 The invention provides a novel process for producing a

(51) Int Cl.: C09C 1/02 ( ) D21H 17/67 ( )

United States Patent Office

United States Patent (19 Ramachandran et al.

FDE 211 Material & Energy Balances. Instructor: Dr. Ilgin Paker Yikici Fall 2015

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4906,789 Grzywa et al. 45 Date of Patent: Mar. 6, 1990

MAHESH TUTORIALS I.C.S.E.

CHEMISTRY. SCIENCE Paper 2

Working with Hazardous Chemicals

MSWI Flue Gas Two-Stage Dry Treatment: Modeling and Simulation

High Efficiency Collector for Laser Plasma EUV Source.

INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCE WITH HYBRID DISTILLATION PERVAPORATION OR VAPOR PERMEATION APPLICATIONS

CHEMISTRY. SCIENCE Paper 2

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 22. 8a 1. United States Patent (19) Maru et al. 11 4,365,007 45) Dec. 21, 1982

(10) Patent No.: US 7820,053 B2

*EP A1* EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2004/22

IGCSE TEST_ (Ch. 2,3,4,5,6) Name... Date...

United States Patent (19) Amiet

Which row correctly describes the type of reaction and the energy of the reactants and products? energy of the reactants and products

Process Classification

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,693,586 Nicolau et al. 45 Date of Patent: Dec. 2, 1997

Unit OperatiOn. Table 1: List of some unit operations

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent NO.: US 6,371,384 ~1 Garcia (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 16,2002

Method of modifying weather

United States Patent (19) 11) 3,970,625

EXPERIMENT #4 Separation of a Three-Component Mixture

United States Patent (19)

Process Design Decisions and Project Economics Prof. Dr. V. S. Moholkar Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

2. Review on Material Balances

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

5.4 Chemical changes Reactivity of metals Metal oxides The reactivity series. Key opportunities for skills development

Methods of purification

CHLORINE PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 61A. Supplement A. by YEN CHEN YEN. May A private report by the STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

CHEMISTRY PAPER 1999

: Y. ti- sk 22N. Sir S. United States Patent (19) Uhri 4,687,061. Aug. 18, Patent Number: 45 Date of Patent: 4 g

Review Topic 8: Phases of Matter and Mixtures

IMADUDDIN SCHOOL Second Term Examination 2017

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,303,925 B2. Sidewell et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 4, 2007

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

United States Patent (19) Micinski

1. (25 points) C 6 H O 2 6CO 2 + 7H 2 O C 6 H O 2 6CO + 7H 2 O

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2011/06

? Ns 54 F2 44. al-f2. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1. (19) United States. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 8, 2013.

United States Patent (19)

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES, TERTIARY EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH MAURITIUS EXAMINATIONS SYNDICATE. CHEMISTRY OCTOBER hour

The Solution Process. Section 2. Increasing the Surface Area of the Solute

Questions Maximum Score Candidate s Score

Systems Engineering Spring Group Project #1: Process Flowsheeting Calculations for Acetic Anhydride Plant. Date: 2/25/00 Due: 3/3/00

Universal Indicator turns green. Which method is used to obtain pure solid X from an aqueous solution? A. mixture

4 aerie Ae/e/ Me7hy/ Aora fe

4.4.1 Reactivity of metals Metal oxides The reactivity series. Key opportunities for skills development.

Methods of Separation. Vacuum Filtration. Distillation. The Physical Separation of Matter Chemistry 11 2/17/2014

EVAPORATION YUSRON SUGIARTO

Transcription:

Nov., 1973 U. NEUMANN 3,773,902 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF POTASSIUM CARBONATE HYDRATE Filed May 26, 1971 S

United States Patent Office 3,773,902 Patented Nov., 1973 3,773,902 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF POTASSUM CARBONATE HYDRATE Ulrich Neumann, Rodenkirchen, Germany, assignor to Chemical Dr. A. Zieren, GmbH & Co. KG, Cologne Braunsfeld, Germany Filed May 26, 1971, Ser. No. 146,986 Claims priority, application Germany, May 26, 1970, P 610.4 U.S. C. 423-421 nt. C. C01d 7/00 10 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE An economically feasible continuous process for the production of potassium carbonate by the carbonation of a potassium hydroxide solution with CO2 on a com mercial scale which is trouble-free and requires simple apparatus in which a stream of the potassium hydroxide solution is fed to a reaction zone where it is reacted with CO at 80-135 C. and 1 torr-atmospheric pressure; sufficient water is evaporated from the solution in the reaction zone to precipitate K2CO3 1/2 H2O; a stream of the precipitated potassium carbonate and a portion of the solution is removed from the reaction zone as a slurry; the liquid and solid phases of the slurry are separated; and the separated liquid phase is recycled to the reaction zone, preferably after heating to a temperature above that of the reaction zone. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a process for the preparation of potassium carbonate hydrate, more particularly by re acting an aqueous potassium hydroxide solution with a carbon dioxide-containing gas. It is known to produce potassium carbonate from elec trolytically obtained potassium hydroxide solution of ap proximately 50% strength by the reaction with waste gases containing carbon dioxide, such as, for example, flue gas or lime kiln gas, in absorption towers. The hy drate K2CO31.5H2O crystallizes during cooling from the hot concentrated solutions obtained by evaporation in a suitable evaporator. The salt separated by centrifuging or suction-filtering is dried at about 1' C., so that the hydrate with 1/2 molecules of water is obtained as the product. The mother liquor can be again worked up in a mixture with fresh solution (Ullmann, vol. 9 (1957), p. 235). This process, due to the separation of reaction, evaporation, and crystallization processes, has the disad vantages of a high heat energy consumption and consid erable initial investment costs, It is known from Austrian patent application A3191/ 68 to react sodium hydroxide solution with carbon di oxide to obtain soda ash. During this process, water is evaporated above 90 C. and sodium carbonate monohy drate is precipitated. This process is not suitable for the production of potassium carbonate hydrate, because si multaneous hydrate deposition and water vaporization according to the process as described therein is possible only at temperatures which are uneconomically high. A work by N. K. Kishinevskij in "Zhur. Priklad. Khim. (1957), pp. 185-194, deals with the kinetics of CO2 absorption in potassium hydroxide solution un der laminar and turbulent flow agitation conditions. How ever, no potassium carbonate hydrate was precipitated in this process, and the reaction temperature was 57 C. at a maximum. It is an object of this invention to provide a process for the preparation of potassium carbonate hydrate from potassium hydroxide solution formed, for example, by potassium amalgam decomposition, with lower external 0. 15 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 heat energy requirements for the water vaporization than the known processes of the prior art. It is another object to provide such a novel method which requires the use of only few apparatus components. Other objects will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which this inven tion pertains. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION These objects are attained in accordance with this in vention by continuous process which comprises the steps of feeding a potassium hydroxide solution to a reaction stage; reacting the potassium hydroxide in the reaction stage with carbon dioxide at a temperature of between 80 and 135 C. and a pressure of between 1 torr mm. Hg) and atmospheric pressure; evaporating water from the reaction stage, thus precipitating potassium carbon ate hydrate from the solution in the reaction stage; re moving from the reaction stage as a slurry the thus-pre cipitated potassium carbonate hydrate separating the solid phase of the slurry from the liquid phase; and recycling the separated liquid phase to the reaction zone. The com bination of the reaction between potassium hydroxide solution and carbon dioxide, the water vaporization, and the precipitation of the potassium carbonate hydrate in a single stage, as effected by the present invention, makes possible the direct utilization of the thus-liberated heat of neutralization for vaporization of the water, which va porization is a prerequisite for the crystallization of the potassium carbonate hydrate. The evaporator and the crystallizer are eliminated, whereby the plant becomes less trouble-prone. The liberated heat of neutralization and crystallization is fully utilized for the evaporation of the water, since this heat is liberated directly in the re action mixture. By the use of subatmospheric pressure, the temperature at which the vaporization and simultane ously the hydrate deposition occur is lowered. This also lessens the heat energy requirements of the process and eliminates the necessity of cooling means to prevent over heating of the reaction solution. The thermal load on the materials is also reduced. The hydrate thus precipitated in the reaction mixture corresponds approximately to the formula K2COs' 1.5H2O. The thus-separated hydrate can be separated from the mother liquor by centrifuging or by filtration. The mother liquor, which is a solution con sisting of about 58-67% by weight of KaCO3, is recycled into the reaction vessel. The gas employed for the reaction can be, for exam ple, a CO2 rich gas consisting of more than 90% by vol ume of CO2, a lime kiln gas consisting of about 40-45% by volume of CO2, or a flue gas consisting of about 8 14% by volume of CO. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of this invention, the potassium hydroxide solution is reacted with the carbon dioxide at temperatures of between 80 and 1 C. and under pressures of between 1 and 700 torr, especially at temperatures of between 90 and 110 C. and under pressures of between 0 and 600 torr. These subatmospheric pressures can be maintained eco nomically by means of steam jet air ejectors. The separated mother liquor is preferably heated, prior to being recycled into the reactor, to a temperature above the reaction temperature. In this manner, there is sup plied to the reaction mixture the amount of heat which is required, above and beyond the heat liberated within the reaction mixture, to vaporize the water in the potassium hydroxide solution which is introduced into the reaction Zone. In a modification of this process, this external heat can also be introduced into the system at some other point, for example by preheating the potassium hydroxide solu tion or the CO2-containing gas or by directly heating the reaction mixture. In all of these cases, a minimum of ex ternal heat is required, since the heat of reaction and

3 crystallization is fully utilized for the water vaporization. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the reaction mixture is stirred or otherwise agitated by turbulence. This results in an increase in the reaction rate, since the rate of diffusion of the CO2 into the solution increases, with the further result that there is a uniform temperature distribution and concentration distribution in the mixture. The potassium carbonate sesquihydrate obtained after separation from the mother liquor can be dehydrated to anhydrous KCO at temperatures of above 240 C. This step is preferably carried out in a steam-heated cal cining drum. The waste gases therefrom are preferably purified in a conventional manner to remove any en trained fine particles of potassium carbonate. The invention will be described below in greater detail with reference to the drawing, wherein a plant for con ducting the process of this invention is illustrated in a schematic view. As shown in the drawing, stirred reactor 1 is fed with a stream of potassium hydroxide solution from storage tank 2 and with a stream of CO-containing gas via con duit 3. A vacuum is produced in the reaction vessel 1 by steam jet air ejector 4 connected thereto. In reactor 1, the aqueous potassium hydroxide solution, obtained, for example, from an alkaline chloride electrolysis state connected upstream of this plant, is reacted with the car bon dioxide in the gas fed to the reactor, during which step potassium carbonate sesquihydrate is precipitated. At the same time, water is evaporated from the reaction mix ture and is removed by the vacuum produced by ejector 4. The reaction mixture with the precipitated potassium carbonate sesquihydrate flows, as a suspension, via conduit 6 into agitator-equipped vessel 5, the gas space of which is in communication with that of reactor 1 via line 7, and thus is likewise maintained under a vacuum. From vessel 5, the suspension is pumped, via conduit 8, into centrifuge 9, where the precipitated hydrate is sepa rated from the mother liquor. The moist hydrate obtained at 10 can be dried and optionally dehydrated in a subse quent drying stage. The mother liquor passes, via line 11, into container 12 containing steam heated heat exchange coils, is heated therein, and recycled via line 13 into reactor 1. In general, the amount of water in the incoming KOH solution should not exceed about 70% by weight of the total solution, and is preferably in the range of 60 to 40%" by weight. The carbonation zone, by virtue of tur bulence is usually kept at a uniform temperature within the 80-135 C. operable range. Due to minor turbulence or laminar flow, temperature variations may exist in the reactor. In this case the average temperature should be at least 80 C. According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, more than 70% by weight of the water of the potassium hydroxide solution is evaporated. Where the potassium hydroxide solution contains not more than 50% by weight of water, the heat of neutralization and of pre cipitation evolved during the carbonation is nearly suf ficient to evaporate the above-mentioned portion of water. However, in a preferred embodiment, the mother liquor separated from the slurry which is removed from the re action Zone is heated to a temperature from about to 60 C. higher than the reaction temperature because the heats of neutralization and precipitation in the carbonat ing Zone are usually insufficient to evaporate enough of the water of the KOH solution to maintain the solution at the desired KCO concentration. This preheating step thus supplements the heats of neutralization and precipita tion to offset the heat demand for water evaporation and the heat loss with slurry removal. Generally, the lower the KOH concentration, the more external heating is nec essary to maintain the system in balance. Specific examples of this relationship are shown in Table I, 3,778,902 0 15 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 TABLE I Recycle mother Reactor liquor Pressure tempera- tempera (torr) ture, C. ture, C. KQE concentration, percent by weight:... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 80 32 50---- 80 126 50------------------------------ 3 100 50------------------------------ 540 12 33 55------------------------------ 3 00 Because the separated mother liquor is recirculated to the carbonation reactor, the entire carbonation stage thus comprises a cyclic process in which most of the water is removed with the separated precipitated potassium car bonate. It is surprising that the water can be removed by evaporation under reduced pressure at high thermal efficiency and with relatively little loss of CO2 and high conversion of KOH to K2CO3. Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the preceding description, utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The fol lowing preferred specific embodiments are, therefore, to be construed as merely illustrative, and not limitative of the remainder of the disclosure in any way whatsoever. EXAMPLE 1. In the plant illustrated in the drawing, 1,000 kg./h. of 50% strength potassium hydroxide solution available at 50 C. from an alkaline chloride electrolysis stage, is re acted with 115 Nm.8/h. of approximately 98% CO2 gas at about 100 C. The reaction mixture is under a pressure of about 0 torr. 405 kg/h. of water evaporates, during which step 592 kg./h. of potassium carbonate sesquihy drate is precipitated. From the reactor, 6,772 kg./h. of suspension is with drawn and separated, by centrifuging, into 5,980 kg/h. of mother liquor and 792 kg/h. of moist potassium car bonate sesquihydrate. The moist hydrate, after drying and dehydration, yields 615 kg./h. of K2CO3. The mother liquor, obtained at a temperature of 90 C., is heated by indirect heat exchange with steam of 5 atmospheres to its boiling point (about 1 C.) and is recycled into the reactor. EXAMPLE 2 In the plant illustrated in the drawing, 440 kg./h. of 50% strength potassium hydroxide solution obtained at 85 C. from an alkaline chloride electrolysis, is reacted with 472 Nm.8/h. of a flue gas having a temperature of 180 C. and containing 9.3% by volume of CO and 18.0% by volume of H.O. The reaction mixture has a temperature of about 100 C. and is under atmospheric pressure. 775 Nm.8/h. of waste gas is discharged having 1.4% by volume of CO and 43.3% by volume of H.O. From the reaction vessel, 1,660 kg./h. of suspension is withdrawn. By centrifuging, 1,3 kg./h. of mother liquor and 340 kg./h. of moist potassium carbonate hydrate are produced. From the moist hydrate, 270.5 kg/h. of KCO is obtained after drying and dehydration. The mother liquor, obtained at 90 C., is heated by means of steam of 5 atmospheres to 1 C. and recycled into the reactor. The preceding examples can be repeated with similar success by Substituting the generically or specifically de scribed reactants and/or operating conditions of this in vention for those used in the preceding examples. From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can easily ascertain the essential characteristics of this in vention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.

What is claimed is: 5 1. A continuous single stage process for the prepara tion of crystalline potassium carbonate hydrate, com prising: (a) reacting an aqueous solution consisting essentially of 70% by weight potassium hydroxide with a gas containing carbon dioxide by bubbling said gas through said aqueous solution at a temperature of 80-135 C. and at a pressure of between 1 mm. Hg and atmospheric pressure with sufficient evapora tion of water to precipitate potassium carbonate hydrate crystals; (b) removing a stream of precipitated potassium car bonate hydrate crystals and a portion of the mother liquor as a slurry from the reaction zone; (c) separating the precipitated potassium carbonate hydrate crystals from the mother liquor of said slurry; and (d) recycling the separated mother liquor back into the reaction zone. 2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the potas sium hydroxide solution is reacted with the carbon dioxide containing gas at a temperature of between 80 and 1 C. and a pressure of between 1 and 700 mm. Hg. 3. A process according to claim 1, wherein the potas sium hydroxide solution is reacted with carbon dioxide containing gas at a temperature of between 90 and 110 C. and a pressure of between 0 and 600 mm. Hg. 4. A process according to claim 2 wherein the mother liquor, prior to being recycled, is heated to a tempera ture from about to 60 C. above the temperature of the reaction solution in the reaction zone which maintains the latter at the selected reaction temperature and wherein 3,778,902 0 5 6 the reaction solution is agitated in a turbulent manner in the reaction zone. 5. A process according to claim 4 wherein the slurry is transferred to a second zone in liquid and gaseous com munication with the reaction zone prior to separation of the precipitated potassium carbonate therein. 6. A process according to claim 1 wherein the mother liquor, prior to being recycled, is heated to a temperature from about to 60 C. above the temperature of the reaction solution in the reaction zone which maintains the latter at the selected reaction temperature. 7. A process according to claim 1 wherein the reaction solution is agitated in a turbulent manner in the reaction ZOC. 8. A process according to claim 1 wherein more than 70% by weight of the water in the potassium hydroxide solution is evaporated in the reaction zone. 9. A process according to claim 8 wherein said aqueous potassium hydroxide solution contains not more than 50% by weight water. 10. A process according to claim 9 wherein the recycled mother liquor consists essentially of about 58-67% by weight of K2CO3. References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,135,605 11/1938 Stevenson ----------- 23-63 3,2,477 8/1965 Loeffler et al. -------- 23-63 3,4,946 6/1966 Hass et al. ----------- 23-63 3,644,089 2/1972 Minz et al. --------- 423-421 OSCAR R. VERTIZ, Primary Examiner J. COOPER, Assistant Examiner

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,773,902 pated November, 1973 Inventor(s) Ulrich. Neumann, et al. It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below: IN THE HEADING, COLUMN l: The Assignee of Record should read -- CHEMIEBAU DR. A. ZIEREN, GmbH & Co. KG. Signed and sealed this 10th day of September 1974. (SEAL) Attest: McCOY M. GIBSON, JR. Attesting Officer C. MARSHALL DANN Commissioner of Patents drm PO-1050 (10-69) USCOMMedC 60376ap69 A U.S. GOWERNMENT PrintNG office: 1989 o-366-334,