Introduction to numerical projects

Similar documents
CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

2 Electronic structure theory

Hartree-Fock-Roothan Self-Consistent Field Method

Next topic: Quantum Field Theories for Quantum Many-Particle Systems; or "Second Quantization"

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators

Potential energy, from Coulomb's law. Potential is spherically symmetric. Therefore, solutions must have form

Jack Simons Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah

Introduction to Computational Chemistry

Self-consistent Field

Intermission: Let s review the essentials of the Helium Atom

Exercises FYS-KJM4480

Solved radial equation: Last time For two simple cases: infinite and finite spherical wells Spherical analogs of 1D wells We introduced auxiliary func

Chem 4502 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics and Spectroscopy 3 Credits Fall Semester 2014 Laura Gagliardi. Lecture 21, November 12, 2014

only two orbitals, and therefore only two combinations to worry about, but things get

CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

Hartree, Hartree-Fock and post-hf methods

MO Calculation for a Diatomic Molecule. /4 0 ) i=1 j>i (1/r ij )

A One-Slide Summary of Quantum Mechanics

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

r R A 1 r R B + 1 ψ(r) = αψ A (r)+βψ B (r) (5) where we assume that ψ A and ψ B are ground states: ψ A (r) = π 1/2 e r R A ψ B (r) = π 1/2 e r R B.

Exercise 1: Structure and dipole moment of a small molecule

Computational Physics. J. M. Thijssen

Preliminary Quantum Questions

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Chem 442 Review for Exam 2. Exact separation of the Hamiltonian of a hydrogenic atom into center-of-mass (3D) and relative (3D) components.

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 20, March 8, 2006

This is a very succinct primer intended as supplementary material for an undergraduate course in physical chemistry.

v(r i r j ) = h(r i )+ 1 N

Introduction to Computational Chemistry

We now turn to our first quantum mechanical problems that represent real, as

( ( ; R H = 109,677 cm -1

A Computer Study of Molecular Electronic Structure

Hartree-Fock. It can also be viewed as the lowest order term in perturbative expansion (linear in U) with respect to interaction between electrons.

Chemistry 883 Computational Quantum Chemistry

Chem 4502 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics and Spectroscopy 3 Credits Fall Semester 2014 Laura Gagliardi. Lecture 28, December 08, 2014

Exercises FYS-KJM4480

Answers Quantum Chemistry NWI-MOL406 G. C. Groenenboom and G. A. de Wijs, HG00.307, 8:30-11:30, 21 jan 2014

3: Many electrons. Orbital symmetries. l =2 1. m l

The Hartree-Fock approximation

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Atomic Systems (PART I)

CHEMISTRY 4021/8021 MIDTERM EXAM 1 SPRING 2014

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 12 and Study Aid

SCF calculation on HeH +

Quantum Mechanical Simulations

OBJECTIVES: By the end of class, students will be able to. SWBAT find the number of shells and number of valence electrons for the different elements.

Atomic Structure Atoms are very small ~ metres All atoms are made up of three sub-atomic particles: protons, neutrons and electrons

Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

P3317 HW from Lecture 7+8 and Recitation 4

Chm 331 Fall 2015, Exercise Set 4 NMR Review Problems

LUMO + 1 LUMO. Tómas Arnar Guðmundsson Report 2 Reikniefnafræði G

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

ECE440 Nanoelectronics. Lecture 07 Atomic Orbitals

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers

Introduction to Path Integral Monte Carlo. Part I.

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics and Spectroscopy 3 Credits Fall Semester 2014 Laura Gagliardi. Lecture 27, December 5, 2014

Chem 467 Supplement to Lecture 19 Hydrogen Atom, Atomic Orbitals

Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum and Atomic Structure

1 Introduction. 2 The hadronic many body problem

Hartree-Fock Theory. ˆf(r)χ i (x) = ɛ i χ i (x) (1) Z A K=1 I. DERIVATION OF THE HARTREE-FOCK EQUATIONS. A. The energy of a Slater determinant

New Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory

Mean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Yingwei Wang Computational Quantum Chemistry 1 Hartree energy 2. 2 Many-body system 2. 3 Born-Oppenheimer approximation 2

Quantum Mechanics-I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 21 Square-Integrable Functions

Student Exploration: Electron Configuration

LS coupling. 2 2 n + H s o + H h f + H B. (1) 2m

Lecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory

Molecular Physics. Attraction between the ions causes the chemical bond.

Consequently, the exact eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian are also eigenfunctions of the two spin operators

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

e L 2m e the Bohr magneton

Optimization of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) wave functions by energy minimization

Lecture 4. Magic Numbers

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 7

with a proper choice of the potential U(r). Clearly, we should include the potential of the ions, U ion (r):.

4πε. me 1,2,3,... 1 n. H atom 4. in a.u. atomic units. energy: 1 a.u. = ev distance 1 a.u. = Å

Lecture 19: Building Atoms and Molecules

Variational Methods for Electronic Structure

Atomic Structure and Atomic Spectra

Quantum mechanics can be used to calculate any property of a molecule. The energy E of a wavefunction Ψ evaluated for the Hamiltonian H is,

Lecture 13: The Actual Shell Model Recalling schematic SM Single-particle wavefunctions Basis states Truncation Sketch view of a calculation

Session 1. Introduction to Computational Chemistry. Computational (chemistry education) and/or (Computational chemistry) education

Beyond the Hartree-Fock Approximation: Configuration Interaction

5.61 Physical Chemistry Final Exam 12/16/09. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Chemistry Chemistry Physical Chemistry

Atoms, Molecules and Solids. From Last Time Superposition of quantum states Philosophy of quantum mechanics Interpretation of the wave function:

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Comparing and Improving Quark Models for the Triply Bottom Baryon Spectrum

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

Lecture 9. Hartree Fock Method and Koopman s Theorem

Reikniefnafræði - Verkefni 1 Haustmisseri 2013 Kennari - Hannes Jónsson

Electronic structure theory: Fundamentals to frontiers. 1. Hartree-Fock theory

Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Pauli Deformation APPENDIX Y

Many-Body Approaches to Quantum Dots

QUANTUM MECHANICS I PHYS 516. Solutions to Problem Set # 1

University of Michigan Physics Department Graduate Qualifying Examination

LECTURE 4: HOW TO GENERATE ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATIONS FOR ATOMS AND IONS

Alkali metals show splitting of spectral lines in absence of magnetic field. s lines not split p, d lines split

Transcription:

Introduction to numerical projects Here follows a brief recipe and recommendation on how to write a report for each project. Give a short description of the nature of the problem and the eventual numerical methods you have used. Describe the algorithm you have used and/or developed. Here you may find it convenient to use pseudocoding. In many cases you can describe the algorithm in the program itself. Include the source code of your program. Comment your program properly. If possible, try to find analytic solutions, or known limits in order to test your program when developing the code. Include your results either in figure form or in a table. Remember to label your results. All tables and figures should have relevant captions and labels on the axes. Try to evaluate the reliabilty and numerical stability/precision of your results. If possible, include a qualitative and/or quantitative discussion of the numerical stability, eventual loss of precision etc. Try to give an interpretation of you results in your answers to the problems. Critique: if possible include your comments and reflections about the exercise, whether you felt you learnt something, ideas for improvements and other thoughts you ve made when solving the exercise. We wish to keep this course at the interactive level and your comments can help us improve it. We do appreciate your comments. Try to establish a practice where you log your work at the computerlab. You may find such a logbook very handy at later stages in your work, especially when you don t properly remember what a previous test version of your program did. Here you could also record the time spent on solving the exercise, various algorithms you may have tested or other topics which you feel worthy of mentioning. Format for electronic delivery of report and programs The preferred format for the report is a PDF file. As programming language we prefer that you choose between C/C++ and Fortran. You could also use Java or Python as programming languages. Matlab/Maple/Mathematica/IDL are not accepted, but you can use them to check your results where possible. Finally, we do prefer that you work together. Optimal working groups consist of 2-3 students, but more people can collaborate. You can then hand in a common report. Below you will also find a guide on how to write up the project as a scientific article. We recommend this option when writing the final report. 1

Project for FYS4411/9411 Spring 2014, Advanced Hartree- Fock Part 1: Hartree-Fock calculations of closed-shell atoms The Hartree-Fock functional is written as E[Φ] = + µ=1 µ h µ 1 2 [ µ=1 ν=1 µν 1 r ij µν µν 1 r ij νµ With the given functional, we can perform at least two types of variational strategies. Vary the Slater determinant by changing the spatial part of the single-particle wave functions themselves. Expand the single-particle functions in a known basis and vary the coefficients, that is, the new function single-particle wave function a is written as a linear expansion in terms of a fixed basis φ (harmonic oscillator, Laguerre polynomials etc) ]. ψ a = λ C aλ φ λ, Both cases lead to a new Slater determinant which is related to the previous via a unitary transformation. The second one is the one we will use in this project. 1a) Consider a Slater determinant built up of single-particle orbitals ψ λ, with λ = 1, 2,..., N. The unitary transformation ψ a = C aλ φ λ, λ brings us into the new basis. Show that the new basis is orthonormal. Show that the new Slater determinant constructed from the new single-particle wave functions can be written as the determinant based on the previous basis and the determinant of the matrix C. Show that the old and the new Slater determinants are equal up to a complex constant with absolute value unity. (Hint, C is a unitary matrix). 1b) Minimizing with respect to Ckα, remembering that Ckα and C kα are independent and defining h HF αγ = α h γ + CaβC aδ αβ V γδ AS, a=1 show that you can write the Hartree-Fock equations as h HF αγ C kγ = ɛ k C kα. Explain the meaning of the different terms. γ 2 βδ

1c) We will now set up the Hartree-Fock program by using hydrogen-like single-particle functions for the 1s, 2s and 3s orbitals. We will apply these basis functions only to the helium and beryllium atoms. For all other systems, we will use so-called Gaussian type of orbitals (GTO). These will be introduced after we have set up our first Hartree-Fock programs. For Hydrogen like-orbitals, the matrix elements involving the Coulomb interaction, can all be evaluated in a closed form, see the table below for all integrals involving these orbitals. Your first step is to write a function which reads in these integrals and sets up the antisymmetrized matrix elements. (Hint: the table lists only the integrals, there is no spin). 1d) With the above ingredients we are now ready to solve the Hartree-Fock equations for the helium and beryllium atoms. Set up the Hartree-Fock equations for the ground states of helium and beryllium with the electrons occupying the respective hydrogen-like orbitals 1s, 2s and 3s. There is no spin-orbit part in the two-body Hamiltonian. Find the single-particle energies iteratively as explained in the slides and lecture notes. Find also the total binding ground state energy and compare this to the energy obtaining without performing the Hartree-Fock calculations. The experimental values are 2.904 atomic units (a.u.) and 14.67 a.u. for the helium and beryllium atoms, respectively. In setting up the equations make sure your Hartree-Fock matrix is block diagonal in the spin quantum numbers. Since there is no spin-dependent part in the Hamiltonian, states with the same l and n will be degenerate in energy with respect to the spin projections. Part 2: Hartree-Fock calculations of atoms and molecules using GTOs 2a) Our next steps involves an object orientation of the code and the inclusion of Gaussiantype of orbitals (GTOs) as detailed in the slides. Your task here is to repeat the calculations of the helium and beryllium atoms using GTOs using three and five primitive functions, a so-called STO-3G and STO-5L basis. Compare your results with those obtained with the hydrogen-like basis discussed above. Comment your results. 2b) Use thereafter a chosen GTO basis and compute the ground state energy of the neon and argon atoms and compare with existing theoretical calculations in the literature. Comment your results. 2c) We switch now to the computation of molecules and will use the hydrogen and beryllium molecules as our first test case with GTOs. The H 2 molecule consists of two protons and two electrons with a ground state energy E = 31.949 ev or 1.175 3

a.u. and the equilibrium distance between the two hydrogen atoms of r 0 = 1.40 Bohr radii (recall that a Bohr radius is 0.05 10 9 m. The Be 2 molecule contains eight electrons and eight protons (in addition we have eight neutrons but their charge is zero). Useful benchmarks for these molecules are the articles of Moskowitz and Kalos, Int. Journal of Quantum Chemistry XX, 1107 (1981) for He and H 2 and Filippi, Singh and Umrigar, J. Chemical Physics 105, 123 (1996) for the Be 2 molecule. You may also find Jørgen Høgberget s Master of Science thesis at the University of Oslo, 2013 a useful reference. 2d) Our final aim is to compute the ground state energy and equilibrium configuration for the water molecule H 2 O and Si 2 O using GTOs. Your task here is to figure out which is the optimal basis and perform calculations of the ground state energy and compare with the literature. With the optimal orbitals we can in turn also compute the charge distribution of electrons, which is given by the the so-called density distribution. Multiplying with the electrical charge gives the charge distribution. The density distribution is defined as ρ(r) = ρ(r 1 ) = dr 2... dr N Ψ(r 1, r 2... r N ) 2, which in a Hartree-Fock based approach becomes ρ(r) = ψ i (r) 2, i=1 with ψ the single-particle wave functions (our best basis). A useful check that the numerics works properly is to integrate the density distributions since it has to give us the total number of electrons in the system, that is N = drρ(r). Compute the density distribution for the H 2, Be 2, H 2 O and Si 2 O molecules at their equilbrium positions (the value of R where the ground state energy is at its minimum). Make plots of the density distributions. Give an interpretation of your results and discuss the physics behind the results. How to write a scientific report What should it contain? A possible structure If you wish to write up your findings as a scientific article, here are some simple guidelines An introduction where you explain the rational for the physics case and what you have done. At the end of the introduction you should give a brief summary of the structure of the report 4

Theoretical models and technicalities. This is the methods section. Results and discussion Conclusions and perspectives Appendix with extra material Bibliography You don t need to answer all questions in a chronological order. When you write the introduction you could focus on the following aspects A central aim is to study the role of correlations due to the repulsion between the electrons. To do this we have singled out several systems from atomic and molecular physics. We test also the wave functions by computing onebody densities. The methods section could contain the following elements: Describe the methods (quantum mechanical and algorithms) You need to explain Hartree-Fock theory. The trial wave functions. Why do you choose the functions you do? You can also plug in some calculations to demonstrate your code, such as selected runs from exercises 1a-1d for helium and beryllium. The results section should include results which support your conclusions. You don t need to present all results, focus on those which you find the most relevant. Provide also benchmarks which you have used in order to validate your code. Present your discussions of results and compare with other calculations and theories and give critical assessments of what you have done. In the concluding section you could focus on State your main findings and interpretations Try as far as possible to present perspectives for future work Try to discuss the pros and cons of the method and possible improvements Additional material, code listings etc can be placed in various appendices. Finally, you should provide a proper list of relevant references. Give always references to material you base your work on, either scientific articles/reports or books. When citing articles, refer as: name(s) of author(s), journal, volume (boldfaced), page and year. For books, refer as: name(s) of author(s), title of book, publisher, place and year, eventual page numbers. 5

Appendix Table 1 contains the matrix elements for the radial integrals to be used for the direct part and the exchange part. Note again that these integrals do not include spin. You will need these integrals in solving the Hartree-Fock equations for the helium and beryllium atoms when using hydrogen-like single-particle states. 6

Table 1: Closed form expressions for the Coulomb matrix elements. The nomenclature is 1 = 1s, 2 = 2s and 3 = 3s, with no spin degrees of freedom. 11 V 11 = (5Z)/8 11 V 12 = (4096 2Z)/64827 11 V 13 = (1269 3Z)/50000 11 V 21 = (4096 2Z)/64827 11 V 22 = (16Z)/729 11 V 23 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 11 V 31 = (1269 3Z)/50000 11 V 32 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 11 V 33 = (189Z)/32768 12 V 11 = (4096 2Z)/64827 12 V 12 = (17Z)/81 12 V 13 = (1555918848 6Z)/75429903125 12 V 21 = (16Z)/729 12 V 22 = (512 2Z)/84375 12 V 23 = (2160 3Z)/823543 12 V 31 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 12 V 32 = (29943 3Z)/13176688 12 V 33 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 13 V 11 = (1269 3Z)/50000 13 V 12 = (1555918848 6Z)/75429903125 13 V 13 = (815Z)/8192 13 V 21 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 13 V 22 = (2160 3Z)/823543 13 V 23 = (37826560 2Z)/22024729467 13 V 31 = (189Z)/32768 13 V 32 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 13 V 33 = (617Z)/(314928 3) 21 V 11 = (4096 2Z)/64827 21 V 12 = (16Z)/729 21 V 13 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 21 V 21 = (17Z)/81 21 V 22 = (512 2Z)/84375 21 V 23 = (29943 3Z)/13176688 21 V 31 = (1555918848 6Z)/75429903125 21 V 32 = (2160 3Z)/823543 21 V 33 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 22 V 11 = (16Z)/729 22 V 12 = (512 2Z)/84375 22 V 13 = (2160 3Z)/823543 22 V 21 = (512 2Z)/84375 22 V 22 = (77Z)/512 22 V 23 = (5870679552 6Z)/669871503125 22 V 31 = (2160 3Z)/823543 22 V 32 = (5870679552 6Z)/669871503125 22 V 33 = (73008Z)/9765625 23 V 11 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 23 V 12 = (2160 3Z)/823543 23 V 13 = (37826560 2Z)/22024729467 23 V 21 = (29943 3Z)/13176688 23 V 22 = (5870679552 6Z)/669871503125 23 V 23 = (32857Z)/390625 23 V 31 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 23 V 32 = (73008Z)/9765625 23 V 33 = (6890942464 2/3Z)/1210689028125 31 V 11 = (1269 3Z)/50000 31 V 12 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 31 V 13 = (189Z)/32768 31 V 21 = (1555918848 6Z)/75429903125 31 V 22 = (2160 3Z)/823543 31 V 23 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 31 V 31 = (815Z)/8192 31 V 32 = (37826560 2Z)/22024729467 31 V 33 = (617Z)/(314928 3) 32 V 11 = (110592 6Z)/24137569 32 V 12 = (29943 3Z)/13176688 32 V 13 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 32 V 21 = (2160 3Z)/823543 32 V 22 = (5870679552 6Z)/669871503125 32 V 23 = (73008Z)/9765625 32 V 31 = (37826560 2Z)/22024729467 32 V 32 = (32857Z)/390625 32 V 33 = (6890942464 2/3Z)/1210689028125 33 V 11 = (189Z)/32768 33 V 12 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 33 V 13 = (617Z)/(314928 3) 33 V 21 = (1216512 2Z)/815730721 33 V 22 = (73008Z)/9765625 33 V 23 = (6890942464 2/3Z)/1210689028125 33 V 31 = (617Z)/(314928 3) 33 V 7 32 = (6890942464 2/3Z)/1210689028125 33 V 33 = (17Z)/256