LECTURE 3: SHEAVES ON R 2, CONSTRUCTIBLE WITH RESPECT TO THE STRATIFICATION BY THE AXES

Similar documents
LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES

274 Microlocal Geometry, Lecture 2. David Nadler Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Micro-support of sheaves

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 9

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19

IC of subvarieties. Logarithmic perversity. Hyperplane complements.

Hodge Theory of Maps

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes

(iv) Whitney s condition B. Suppose S β S α. If two sequences (a k ) S α and (b k ) S β both converge to the same x S β then lim.

Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties

PICARD GROUPS OF MODULI PROBLEMS II

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Locally G-ringed spaces and rigid spaces

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

A Gauss-Bonnet theorem for constructible sheaves on reductive groups

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Lecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 5

Porteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves

Sheaves. S. Encinas. January 22, 2005 U V. F(U) F(V ) s s V. = s j Ui Uj there exists a unique section s F(U) such that s Ui = s i.

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18

Factorization of birational maps for qe schemes in characteristic 0

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 5

PERVERSE SHEAVES. Contents

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 14 and 15

Stratified Morse Theory: Past and Present

Show that the second projection Ñ Fl n identifies Ñ as a vector bundle over Fl n. In particular, Ñ is smooth. (Challenge:

Vanishing Cycles and Thom s a f Condition

AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES

Homework in Topology, Spring 2009.

1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim

DESCENT THEORY (JOE RABINOFF S EXPOSITION)

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

PROBLEMS FOR VIASM MINICOURSE: GEOMETRY OF MODULI SPACES LAST UPDATED: DEC 25, 2013

14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces

Distance in the Plane

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48

Topics in Algebraic Geometry

in path component sheaves, and the diagrams

Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology

A First Lecture on Sheaf Cohomology

Or, more succinctly, lim

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 2 Oct 2002

THREE APPROACHES TO CHOW S THEOREM

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 3

On Normal Stratified Pseudomanifolds

h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

Characterizing the Equational Theory

Geometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem

which is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

THE STRUCTURE OF THE MODULI STACK OF ELLIPTIC CURVES

Assume the left square is a pushout. Then the right square is a pushout if and only if the big rectangle is.

Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

DISCRETE DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: AN APPLIED INTRODUCTION Keenan Crane CMU /858B Fall 2017

Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor

Categories and functors

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Topology of Toric Varieties, Part II

Calculus (Math 1A) Lecture 5

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

The Riemann-Roch Theorem

9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up

11.1 Vectors in the plane

RIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANN-ROCH

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6

Math 797W Homework 4

Lecture 9 - Faithfully Flat Descent

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 14

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37

Elliptic curves, Néron models, and duality

Lecture 8: The Field B dr

Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3)

An Introduction to Spectral Sequences

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

Topological K-theory, Lecture 3

ORBIFOLDS AND ORBIFOLD COHOMOLOGY

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25

The Cone Theorem. Stefano Filipazzi. February 10, 2016

TCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions)

Transcription:

LECTURE 3: SHEAVES ON R 2, CONSTRUCTIBLE WITH RESPECT TO THE STRATIICATION BY THE AXES VIVEK SHENDE Today we will do a calculation in some detail of the microsupports of sheaves on R 2 which are constructible with respect to the stratification into the four open quadrants, the four half-axes, and the origin. 1. SHEAVES ON R 2, CONSTRUCTIBLE WITH RESPECT TO THE STRATIICATION BY THE AXES Recall from last time that the star of a stratum in a stratification is the union of all strata whose closures contain it, and we define the structure of a poset on the set of strata by taking σ τ when the star of σ contains the star of τ. In the present, case the structure is as follows, drawn superimposed on the stratification: This is poset; all diagrams commute. In the future we will not draw the red arrows. As we discussed last time, from any sheaf and any stratification, we get a representation of the stratification poset, by using the restriction maps of the sheaf. In this example, for a sheaf on R 2, we would get the following: 1

2 VIVEK SHENDE ], 0[ ]0, [ ], 0[ R ], 0[ ], 0[ R ]0, [ R R R ], 0[ ]0, [ ]0, [ ]0, [ R ]0, [ ], 0[ Conversely, consider any diagram of the above form, let us say NW N NE W C E SW S W We would like to define from this data a sheaf, constructible with respect to the above stratification. We more-or-less said how to do this last time: take a base β of the topology consisting of open sets minimally contained in each strata; define a β presheaf assigning these open sets to the values NE, N, NW, etc., and then finally sheafify. The resulting sheaf is locally constant with respect to the stratification, with stalk NE in the northeast quadrant, etc. 2. MICROSUPPORTS Our purpose today is to compute the microsupport of such sheaves. 2.1. An approximate definition. We ll use the following approximate definition of the microsupport. The microsupport away from zero of a sheaf on R n is the closure in T R n = R n R n \ 0 of the locus of points x, ξ 0 such that, for 0 < δ << ɛ << 1, the following map is not an isomorphism: H {z R n x z < ɛ and ξx z < δ} H {z R n x z < ɛ and ξx z < δ} This is only an approximation to the real definition because we have just taken linear functions instead of allowing any function with derivative ξ, and also have failed to impose conditions on points near x. Also we re presently only discussing sheaves rather than complexes of sheaves. But in any case, the definition above is good enough for our purposes today.

LECTURE 3: SHEAVES ON R 2, CONSTRUCTIBLE WITH RESPECT TO THE STRATIICATION BY THE AXES 3 2.2. Cech warmup. The above definition involves computing cohomology groups, and a morphism between them. Let s first practice with the definition of Cech cohomology. Consider the stratification R =, 1 { 1} 1, 1 {1} 1, rom a sheaf on R, we obtain a diagram of the form: ], 1[ ], 1[ ] 1, 1[ ] 1, [ ]1, [ In case the sheaf is constructible with respect to the stratification, this data suffices to determine it; moreover the Cech complex can be identified with ], 1[ ] 1, [ ] 1, 1[ with the first term in degree zero, and the second in degree one. Example. Consider the sheaf Z [ 1,1], which is the constructible sheaf that gives rise to the diagram 0 Z Z Z 0 Its Cech cohomology is calculated by the complex Z Z Z That is, H 0 R, Z [ 1,1] = Z, and all other cohomology groups vanish. Example. Consider the sheaf Z ] 1,1[, which is the constructible sheaf that gives rise to the diagram 0 0 Z 0 0 Its Cech cohomology is calculated by the complex 0 0 Z That is, H 1 R, Z ] 1,1[ = Z, and all other cohomology groups vanish. Example. Consider more generally the constructible sheaf that gives rise to the diagram A B C D E Its Cech cohomology is calculated by the complex B D C

4 VIVEK SHENDE 2.3. Microsupport calculations. ix a sheaf constructible with respect to a stratification by the axes we encode its isomorphism type by a diagram NW N NE W C E SW S SE We wish to calculate its microsupport. This is, evidently from the definition, a conical locus in the cotangent bundle; also we have only defined the microsupport away from zero. Thus we can characterize the microsupport by its image in or restriction to the cosphere bundle S R 2, viewed as the real projectivization of or unit covectors in the cotangent bundle. At the cost of fixing a metric for drawing pictures, we always take the Euclidean metric we can indicate this locus graphically by drawing the tangent vectors identified with the desired cotangent vectors. Away from the axes, the sheaf is locally constant; there can be no nonzero microsupport. Let us look along the y-axis in the upper region: NW N NE We are interested in the cotangent vectors above a point along this axes; as mentioned above we represent them by the tangent vectors using the inner product. irst let us consider vectors x, y 0. To compute the microsupport along such a direction involves comparing cohomology over the following sorts of region:

LECTURE 3: SHEAVES ON R 2, CONSTRUCTIBLE WITH RESPECT TO THE STRATIICATION BY THE AXES 5 The cohomology over both those open sets is N, and the restriction canonically induces an isomorphism. On the other hand, consider the vector 1, 0. The corresponding microsupport calculation involves studying the following comparison: This time, the restriction map on cohomologies is N NW. Thus, there is microsupport in the 1, 0 direction if and only if the map N NW is not an isomorphism. Note this map is the one going the opposite way as the above indicated arrow. Similarly, to study the microsupport in the direction 1, 0 we consider the following comparison and determine that there s microsupport in the 1, 0 direction iff the map N NE is nontrivial. Let us turn our attention to the origin. Let us investigate whether there is microsupport in the 1, 1 direction. This means studying the following comparison:

6 VIVEK SHENDE The red region is covered by the restriction of the star of the center stratum, so its cohomology is just C. The stratification of the blue region has the same shape as Its cohomology is calculated analogously by the complex S W SW. Thus we see that there is no microsupport in the 1, 1 direction or similarly in the x, y direction for x, y > 0 if and only if the following sequence is exact: 0 C S W SW 0 Exercise. Think carefully about the signs in the above sequence.