Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates

Similar documents
Resonance Interaction Free. Measurement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, (1996) Harry Paul and Mladen Pavičić, 1

7 Three-level systems

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

EE-LE E OPTI T C A L S Y TE

Optically polarized atoms. Marcis Auzinsh, University of Latvia Dmitry Budker, UC Berkeley and LBNL Simon M. Rochester, UC Berkeley

2.4. Quantum Mechanical description of hydrogen atom

Optical Pumping in 85 Rb and 87 Rb

ELECTROMAGNETICALLY INDUCED TRANSPARENCY IN RUBIDIUM 85. Amrozia Shaheen

Compendium of concepts you should know to understand the Optical Pumping experiment. \ CFP Feb. 11, 2009, rev. Ap. 5, 2012, Jan. 1, 2013, Dec.28,2013.

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

Optical Pumping of Rb 85 & Rb 87

Chapter 28. Atomic Physics

Requirements for scaleable QIP

Coherent states, beam splitters and photons

Quantum information processing using linear optics

Applied Physics 150a: Homework #3

In Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases

Building Blocks for Quantum Computing Part IV. Design and Construction of the Trapped Ion Quantum Computer (TIQC)

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Optical pumping of rubidium

Atomic and nuclear physics

The Elitzur-Vaidman Interaction-Free Measurements

Different ion-qubit choises. - One electron in the valence shell; Alkali like 2 S 1/2 ground state.

Part I. Principles and techniques

Zeno logic gates using micro-cavities

Lecture 11: Polarized Light. Fundamentals of Polarized Light. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Scattering Polarization. Zeeman Effect.

California Institute of Technology Physics 77. Optical Pumping. Eric D. Black. September 27, 2004

Excitation of high angular momentum Rydberg states

Dark States. From Quantum Optics to Ultracold Atoms and Molecules

1 Recall what is Spin

The Zeeman Effect refers to the splitting of spectral

Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15

Chapter 4 Section 2 Notes

Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing. Course Outline 2009

Atomic Physics (Phys 551) Final Exam Solutions

Ground state cooling via Sideband cooling. Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013

Ion trap quantum processor

Second-order magic radio-frequency dressing for magnetically trapped 87. Rb atoms

Waves & Oscillations

Motion and motional qubit

14. Matrix treatment of polarization

Preliminary Quantum Questions

Today: general condition for threshold operation physics of atomic, vibrational, rotational gain media intro to the Lorentz model

A Stern-Gerlach experiment for slow light

Optical Pumping in Rubidium

Lecture 4: Polarimetry 2. Scattering Polarization. Zeeman Effect. Hanle Effect. Outline

Physics 208 Review Questions

Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms

Saturation Absorption Spectroscopy of Rubidium Atom

PHY451, Spring /5

JRE Group of Institutions ASSIGNMENT # 1 Special Theory of Relativity

QUANTUM THEORY & ATOMIC STRUCTURE. GENERAL CHEMISTRY by Dr. Istadi

Theory and Experiment

Quantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs

Engineering Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for cold atoms in a double tripod configuration

ATOMIC STRUCRURE

H!!!! = E! Lecture 7 - Atomic Structure. Chem 103, Section F0F Unit II - Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure Lecture 7. Lecture 7 - Introduction

Chapters 31 Atomic Physics

Laser MEOP of 3 He: Basic Concepts, Current Achievements, and Challenging Prospects

Adiabatic transfer for atomic interferometry

Quantum computing with cavity QED

Atomic and nuclear physics

Emergence of Electromagnetically Induced Absorption in a Perturbation Solution of Optical Bloch Equations 1

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Precision Spectroscopy of Excited. States in Rubidium

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

2) The energy of a photon of light is proportional to its frequency and proportional to its wavelength.

Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics. Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University

1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves 3. Wave Nature of Light

Direct Cooling of Molecules

PHYSICAL SCIENCES PART A

Sodium Guidestar Return From Broad CW Sources. CfAO Fall Workshop Comments COVER SLIDE

Side resonances and metastable excited state of NV - center in diamond


Zeeman Effect. Alex Povilus Physics 441- Fall 2003 December 20, 2003

Absorption and Fluorescence Studies on Hyperfine Spectra of Rb and Dressed state picture

I. Short answer The responses below include suggestions (not exhaustive) of points you might have raised in answering the questions.

Laser Cooling and Trapping of Atoms

CMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies. Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing. October 8, 2018

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

Quantum Optics exam. M2 LOM and Nanophysique. 28 November 2017

C H E M 1 CHEM 101-GENERAL CHEMISTRY CHAPTER 6 THE PERIODIC TABLE & ATOMIC STRUCTURE INSTR : FİLİZ ALSHANABLEH

Felix Kleißler 1,*, Andrii Lazariev 1, and Silvia Arroyo-Camejo 1,** 1 Accelerated driving field frames

Atomic Term Symbols and Energy Splitting. λ=5890 Å

Chapter 10. Interference of Light

Saturated Absorption for a Magneto-Optical Atom Trap as a Step toward Atomic Dipole Traps in a Diffraction Pattern from a Circular Aperture

A more comprehensive theory was needed. 1925, Schrödinger and Heisenberg separately worked out a new theory Quantum Mechanics.

Chapter 31 Atomic Physics

PHYSICS Units 3&4 Written examination

Atomic Structure. Chapter 8

Optical Pumping of Rubidium

polarisation of Light

Optical pumping and the Zeeman Effect

Interference effects on the probe absorption in a driven three-level atomic system. by a coherent pumping field

Applications of Atomic Ensembles In Distributed Quantum Computing

Complete nomenclature for electron orbitals

a. What is the length of the string? b. What is the fundamental frequency of this piece of string?

Pulse retrieval and soliton formation in a nonstandard scheme for dynamic electromagnetically induced transparency

Quantum Information through Angular momentum of Photon

Sommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:

Transcription:

Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates (Milan, May 17, 2007) Mladen Pavičić pavicic@grad.hr ; Web: http://m3k.grad.hr/pavicic University of Zagreb Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 1/1

Early Interaction-Free Experiments Ancient Ideas: Renninger (1960), Dicke (1981), Pavičić (1986): Whenever we fail to detect interference we know that something is there. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 2/1

Early Interaction-Free Experiments Ancient Ideas: Renninger (1960), Dicke (1981), Pavičić (1986): Whenever we fail to detect interference we know that something is there. E.g., Pavičić (1986): Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 2/1

Early Interaction-Free Experiments Ancient Ideas: Renninger (1960), Dicke (1981), Pavičić (1986): Whenever we fail to detect interference we know that something is there. E.g., Pavičić (1986): 1993 enter Elitzur and Vaidman and say: Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 2/1

Early Interaction-Free Experiments Ancient Ideas: Renninger (1960), Dicke (1981), Pavičić (1986): Whenever we fail to detect interference we know that something is there. E.g., Pavičić (1986): 1993 enter Elitzur and Vaidman and say: Measurements might be useful Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 2/1

Ring Resonator Harry Paul & Pavičić (Berlin, 1996) Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 3/1

Ring Resonator Harry Paul & Pavičić (Berlin, 1996) Matteo was also there at the time Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 3/1

Ring Resonator Harry Paul & Pavičić (Berlin, 1996) Matteo was also there at the time Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 3/1

Ring Resonator Harry Paul & Pavičić (Berlin, 1996) Matteo was also there at the time Let us calculate what we get at D r : Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 3/1

Interference Reflected portion of the incoming beam: B 0 = A R Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 4/1

Interference Reflected portion of the incoming beam: B 0 = A R After a full round trip this joins it: B 1 = A 1 R R 1 R e iψ Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 4/1

Interference Reflected portion of the incoming beam: B 0 = A R After a full round trip this joins it: B 1 = A 1 R R 1 R e iψ All round trips: interference (a geometric progression) the total amplitude (D r ): B = i=0 B i = A R 1 eiψ 1 R e iψ Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 4/1

Resonator Int.-Free Experiments ψ = (ω ω res )T phase per round-trip (r-t); ω incoming frequency; T r-t time; ω res resonance frequency (λ/2 = L/k, L r-t length) Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 5/1

Resonator Int.-Free Experiments ψ = (ω ω res )T phase per round-trip (r-t); ω incoming frequency; T r-t time; ω res resonance frequency (λ/2 = L/k, L r-t length) So, ω = ω res B = 0 Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 5/1

Resonator Int.-Free Experiments ψ = (ω ωres)t phase per round-trip (r-t); ω incoming frequency; T r-t time; ωres resonance frequency (λ/2 = L/k, L r-t length) So, ω = ωres B = 0 ABS (a) M M ABS ABS ABS (b) M M O O D r t D D t D r Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 5/1

Classical Efficiency The efficiency of the suppression of the reflection into D r when there is no object in the resonator; ρ is the measure of losses Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 6/1

Let object be atom 87 Rb has closed shells up to 4p and an electron in ground state 5s (J = L + S); We consider only one excited state: 5p 1/2. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 7/1

Let object be atom 87 Rb has closed shells up to 4p and an electron in ground state 5s (J = L + S); We consider only one excited state: 5p 1/2. Total nuclear ang. mom. K and J give the total ang. mom. of the atom: F = J + K. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 7/1

Let object be atom 87 Rb has closed shells up to 4p and an electron in ground state 5s (J = L + S); We consider only one excited state: 5p 1/2. Total nuclear ang. mom. K and J give the total ang. mom. of the atom: F = J + K. 87 Rb has K = 3/2, and its j = 1/2 ground states are split by hyperfine interaction into doublets with F = K ± j = 3/2 ± 1/2 = 2, 1. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 7/1

Let object be atom 87 Rb has closed shells up to 4p and an electron in ground state 5s (J = L + S); We consider only one excited state: 5p 1/2. Total nuclear ang. mom. K and J give the total ang. mom. of the atom: F = J + K. 87 Rb has K = 3/2, and its j = 1/2 ground states are split by hyperfine interaction into doublets with F = K ± j = 3/2 ± 1/2 = 2, 1. External magnetic field B splits the levels into magnetic Zeeman sublevels: m = F, F + 1,..., F. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 7/1

Atom vs. photon To excite and deexcite electrons between m = ±1 and m = 0 we must use circularly polarized photons with j p = 1 and m jp = ±1 Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 8/1

Atom vs. photon To excite and deexcite electrons between m = ±1 and m = 0 we must use circularly polarized photons with j p = 1 and m jp = ±1 When an atom receives angular momentum of a photon, the following selection rules must be met: l = ±1, m = m jp = ±1. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 8/1

Atom vs. photon To excite and deexcite electrons between m = ±1 and m = 0 we must use circularly polarized photons with j p = 1 and m jp = ±1 When an atom receives angular momentum of a photon, the following selection rules must be met: l = ±1, m = m jp = ±1. When a photon is emitted, the same selection rules must be observed. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 8/1

Atom vs. photon (ctnd.) By solving Schrödinger equation for our three-level system Ĥ Ψ = i h Ψ t, Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 9/1

Atom vs. photon (ctnd.) By solving Schrödinger equation for our three-level system Ĥ Ψ = i h Ψ t, we arrive at the Hamiltonian Ĥ = h 2 0 Ω 1 (t) 0 Ω 1 (t) 2 Ω 2 (t) 0 Ω 2 (t) 0 Ω 1 and Ω 2 are Rabi frequencies Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 9/1

Excited state drops out One of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian is Ψ 0 = 1 Ω 2 1 (t) + Ω 2 2(t) (Ω 2(t) g 1 Ω 1 (t) g 2 ) Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 10/1

Excited state drops out One of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian is Ψ 0 = 1 Ω 2 1 (t) + Ω 2 2(t) (Ω 2(t) g 1 Ω 1 (t) g 2 ) It depends only on dark states g 1 and g 2 Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 10/1

Excited state drops out One of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian is Ψ 0 = 1 Ω 2 1 (t) + Ω 2 2(t) (Ω 2(t) g 1 Ω 1 (t) g 2 ) It depends only on dark states g 1 and g 2 We can use this to obtain a direct transfer of electrons from g 1 to g 2 without either emitting or absorbing photons on the part of atom in the following way Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP). Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 10/1

STIRAP Experimentally, let photons be laser beams. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 11/1

STIRAP Experimentally, let photons be laser beams. Now, let us switch on and off the second laser before switching on and off the first one. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 11/1

STIRAP Experimentally, let photons be laser beams. Now, let us switch on and off the second laser before switching on and off the first one. This can be described by g 1 Ψ 0 2 = 1 for t g 2 Ψ 0 2 = 1 for t + Adiabatic complete population transfer g 1 g 2 is STIRAP: Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 11/1

STIRAP g 1 g 2 F=2 h ω 1 σ + m= 0 e σ h ω 2 Ω 2 F=2 F=1 m= 1 g 1 Ω 1 STIRAP g 2 m= 1 Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 12/1

Interaction-free excitation A left-hand circularly polarized photon could excite an atom from its ground state g 1 to its excited state e and a right-hand circularly polarized photon could excite the atom from g 2 to e. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 13/1

Interaction-free excitation A left-hand circularly polarized photon could excite an atom from its ground state g 1 to its excited state e and a right-hand circularly polarized photon could excite the atom from g 2 to e. So an L-photon will see the atom in g 1 but will not see it when it is in g 2. With an R-photon, the opposite is true. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 13/1

Interaction-free excitation A left-hand circularly polarized photon could excite an atom from its ground state g 1 to its excited state e and a right-hand circularly polarized photon could excite the atom from g 2 to e. So an L-photon will see the atom in g 1 but will not see it when it is in g 2. With an R-photon, the opposite is true. We can induce a change of the atom from g 1 to g 2 and back by a STIRAP process, with two additional external laser beams Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 13/1

State notation We feed our resonator with +45 and 45 linearly polarized photons. In front of an atom we place a quarter-wave plate (QWP) to turn a 45 -photon into an R-photon and a 45 -photon into an L-photon. Behind the atom we place a half-wave plate (HWP) to change the direction of the circular polarization and then another QWP to transform the polarization back into the original linear polarization. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 14/1

State notation (ctnd.) We denote the atom states as follows: 0 = g 1, 1 = g 2 They are control states; atom is control qubit. We denote the photon states as follows: 0 = 45, 1 = 45 They are target states; photons are target qubits. For example, 01 means that the atom is in state g 1 and the photon is polarized along 45. Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 15/1

Interaction-free CNOT gate (a) M g1 M (b) M g 2 M QWP HWP QWP QWP HWP QWP 0,1 M ABS 1 ABS 0 PBS M HWP M D 0,1 M ABS 0 ABS 1 PBS M HWP M D M 0,1 SBS M 1,0 SBS (a) The atom is in state g 1 and can absorb 1 ; (b) The atom is in state g 2 and can absorb 0 ; 00 00, 01 01, 10 11, 11 10 Interaction-Free Ion-Photon Gates p. 16/1