Model Analysis of Corn Response to Applied Nitrogen and Plant Population Density

Similar documents
Model of Dry Matter and Plant Nitrogen Partitioning between Leaf and Stem for Coastal Bermudagrass. II. Dependence on Growth Interval

Model of Dry Matter and Plant Nitrogen Partitioning between Leaf and Stem for Coastal Bermudagrass. I. Dependence on Harvest Interval

Model Analysis for Response of Dwarf Elephantgrass to Applied Nitrogen and Rainfall

Model Analysis for Growth Response of Soybean

Model Analysis for Partitioning of Dry Matter and Plant Nitrogen for Stem and Leaf in Alfalfa

In Defense of the Extended Logistic Model of Crop Production

CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2002

Example 1: What do you know about the graph of the function

4. Functions of one variable

ELEVATED ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE EFFECTS ON SORGHUM AND SOYBEAN NUTRIENT STATUS 1

Polynomial Functions of Higher Degree

Equilibrium Moisture Content of Triticale Seed

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Weed Competition and Interference

VALIDATION OF TECHNIQUE TO ESTIMATE LOGISTIC MODEL PARAMETERS FROM LINEAR-PLATEAU

Exponential Growth and Decay - M&M's Activity

Graphing Exponential Functions

The Mass of the Proton

Practical and Efficient Evaluation of Inverse Functions

Nutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta

Received 24 November 2015; accepted 17 January 2016; published 20 January 2016

Nutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels.

The Mass of the Proton

Asymptotes are additional pieces of information essential for curve sketching.

9 - Markov processes and Burt & Allison 1963 AGEC

AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS

MATH 108 REVIEW TOPIC 6 Radicals

TREES. Functions, structure, physiology

Chapter 6. Nonlinear Equations. 6.1 The Problem of Nonlinear Root-finding. 6.2 Rate of Convergence

Major Nutrients Trends and some Statistics

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2016 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Math Honors Calculus I Final Examination, Fall Semester, 2013

Glossary. Also available at BigIdeasMath.com: multi-language glossary vocabulary flash cards. An equation that contains an absolute value expression

PURPOSE To develop a strategy for deriving a map of functional soil water characteristics based on easily obtainable land surface observations.

Full terms and conditions of use:

Exam. Name. Domain: (0, ) Range: (-, ) Domain: (0, ) Range: (-, ) Domain: (-, ) Range: (0, ) Domain: (-, ) Range: (0, ) y

CHAPTER 1 : BASIC SKILLS

Development and Test of Potassium Management Algorithms for Corn. Ron Potok (Solum), Kyle Freeman (Mosaic), and Scott Murrell (IPNI) Project Summary:

AP Calculus AB Summer Assignment

Math RE - Calculus I Exponential & Logarithmic Functions Page 1 of 9. y = f(x) = 2 x. y = f(x)

Soil - the battery of your business

MAIZE PRODUCTION AND CATION CONTENT IN BIOMASS DEPENDING ON SOIL ACIDITY NEUTRALIZATION AND MINERAL NUTRITION

Evapotranspiration. Rabi H. Mohtar ABE 325

Studies on the Growth-development Law and Suitable Period for Harvesting of Pinellia ternata (Thunb)Breit

AP Calculus AB Summer Assignment

N Management in Potato Production. David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota

Comparison of Stochastic Soybean Yield Response Functions to Phosphorus Fertilizer

AGR1006. Assessment of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculants for Pulse Crop Production Systems

Prerequisites for Calculus

Exponential growth and decay models have the form y = A e bt, t 0 for constants A and b, where independent variable t usually represents time.

Control. Crabgrass. in Georgia Hayfields

Integrating the production functions of Liebig, Michaelis Menten, Mitscherlich and Liebscher into one system dynamics model

Impact on Agriculture

Soil Fertility. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management June 1, Patricia Steinhilber

YIELD, NUTRITIVE VALUE, AND PERSISTENCE RESPONSES OF BAHIAGRASS GENOTYPES TO EXTENDED DAYLENGTH AND DEFOLIATION MANAGEMENT

Developing and Validating a Model for a Plant Growth Regulator

AMMONIUM UPTAKE FROM DILUTE SOLUTIONS BY PINUS RADIATA SEEDLINGS

To find the absolute extrema on a continuous function f defined over a closed interval,

3x 2. x ))))) and sketch the graph, labelling everything.

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

School Year

Boron Desorption Kinetic in Calcareous Soils

Montana s Noxious Weeds: Integrated Weed Management

Fourier Analysis Fourier Series C H A P T E R 1 1

Precision Ag. Technologies and Agronomic Crop Management. Spatial data layers can be... Many forms of spatial data

5.6 Asymptotes; Checking Behavior at Infinity

OCN 401. Photosynthesis

Only healthy soil can grow a nutrient dense food. You are what you eat!

PHYS 7411 Spring 2015 Computational Physics Homework 3

Sustainability 101: Just What is Carbon Sequestration? Mary Owen UMass, Amherst, Extension Turf Program

Chapter 2 Agro-meteorological Observatory

Dynamics in tiller weight and its association with herbage mass and tiller density in a bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) pasture under cattle grazing

Rocks and Weathering

The effect of phosphorus concentration on the growth of Salvinia minima Chesa Ramacciotti

MYCORRHIZAL COLONIZATION AS IMPACTED BY CORN HYBRID

Power EP. Thomas Minka Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge, UK MSR-TR , October 4, Abstract

3.8 Limits At Infinity

Using Ion-Selective Electrodes to Map Soil Properties

How do we measure mass? What is mass? We measure mass with balances. The most familiar kind of balance is a gravitational balance.

Calculus B Exam III (Page 1) May 11, 2012

Effect of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on the number of leaching rain events in Florida and implications on nutrient management

Constants and Conversions

Breeding Tetraploid Bahiagrass for Traits Conducive to Sod-based Crop Rotations

Mathematics B. Statistics. General comments. Characteristics of good responses Senior External Examination Assessment report

THE LANGUAGE OF PHYSICS:

Comparison of Scaled Canopy Temperatures with Measured Results under Center Pivot Irrigation

UNIT TWO EXPONENTS AND LOGARITHMS MATH 621B 20 HOURS

APPLICATION OF NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY (NIRS) FOR MACRONUTRIENTS ANALYSIS IN ALFALFA. (Medicago sativa L.) A. Morón and D. Cozzolino.

Delegate LVL1 Program Summary:

Some New Inequalities for a Sum of Exponential Functions

Partitioning the contributions of biochar properties to enhanced biological nitrogen

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY. Course Instructor : Prof. P. P. MUJUMDAR Department of Civil Engg., IISc.

Practice UNIT 2 ACTIVITY 2.2 ACTIVITY 2.1

Non-linear least squares

Bahiagrass Breeding at the University of Florida

2. Irrigation. Key words: right amount at right time What if it s too little too late? Too much too often?

Pepper cultivation on a substrate consisting of soil, natural zeolite and olive mill waste sludge-changes in soil properties

Effect of Soil Available Calcium on N P K Contents and Uptake of Flue-cured Tobacco

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Transcription:

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37: 1157 117, 006 Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN 0010-364 print/153-416 online DOI: 10.1080/001036060063350 Model Analysis of Corn Response to Applied Nitrogen and Plant Population Density Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA Abstract: The etended logistic model relates seasonal dry matter and plant nutrient uptake to applied nutrient level. It has been shown to apply to data for annuals such as corn (Zea mays L.) and perennials such as bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flügge). The linear parameters in the model have been shown to depend on water availability and harvest interval (for perennials). Further work is needed to relate model parameters to plant characteristics. In this article, data from a field eperiment with corn at si nitrogen levels (0, 0.5, 1.0,.0, 3.0, and 5.0 g N plant 1 ) and three plant population densities (3, 6, and 9 plants m ; 3, 6, and 9 10 4 plants ha 1 ) are used to provide insight into this question. It turns out that all five model parameters are dependent on plant density, approaching maimum values at 8.3 plants m. Three of the parameters approach zero as density approaches zero, which seems intuitively correct. It is concluded that lower and upper limits of plant nitrogen concentration are independent of population density and are functions of the particular plant species. Detailed procedures are described for estimation of model parameters. Keywords: Corn, models, nitrogen, plant population INTRODUCTION Crop production depends on several factors, including level of applied nutrients [such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K)], water Received 7 July 004, Accepted 5 July 005 Address correspondence to A. R. Overman, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3611-0570, USA. E-mail: aroverman@ifas.ufl.edu 1157

1158 availability (rainfall and/or irrigation), and cultural practices (such as harvest interval for perennials). The etended logistic model was developed to relate seasonal production (dry matter and plant nutrient uptake) to applied nutrients. This analysis focuses on response of corn to applied nitrogen at three plant population densities. Quantitative relations are developed between model parameters and population density. Significance of the relations is discussed. MODEL DESCRIPTION The etended logistic model of seasonal crop response to applied nutrients is based on two postulates (Overman and Scholtz 00): 1) seasonal uptake of a plant nutrient is coupled to applied nutrient through a logistic equation, and ) seasonal plant yield of dry matter is coupled to seasonal plant nutrient uptake through a hyperbolic equation. These postulates can be stated in mathematical terms as N u ¼ A n 1 þ epðb n C n NÞ ð1þ Y ¼ Y mn u ðþ K n þ N u where N is applied nutrient (N, P, or K), kg ha 1 ; N u is seasonal plant nutrient uptake (N, P, or K), kg ha 1 ; Y is seasonal dry matter yield, Mg ha 1 ; A n is maimum plant nutrient uptake at high applied nutrient level, kg ha 1 ; B n is intercept parameter for plant nutrient uptake; C n is response coefficient, ha kg 1 ; Y m is potential maimum dry matter yield, Mg ha 1 ; and K n is nutrient uptake coefficient, kg ha 1. These postulates were formulated after etensive analysis of field data. Equation () is easily rearranged to the linear form N c ¼ N u Y ¼ K n þ 1 N u ð3þ Y m Y m where N c is plant nutrient concentration (N, P, or K), g kg 1. Equations () and (3) constitute the phase relations (Y and N c vs. N u ) for the plant system. It is common practice to refer to N c as concentration, but it should more properly be called specific nutrient, mass of nutrient per unit mass of dry matter, N u /Y. Several consequences follow directly from equations (1) and (). Substitution of equation (1) into equation () leads, after rearrangement and simplification, to the second logistic equation, Y ¼ A y 1 þ epðb y C n NÞ ð4þ

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1159 where A y is maimum dry matter yield at high applied nutrient, Mg ha 1 ; and B y is intercept parameter for dry matter yield. Hyperbolic and logistic model parameters are related by A y Y m ¼ 1 epð DBÞ A n K n ¼ epðdbþ 1 ð5þ ð6þ where DB is defined by DB ¼ B n B y ð7þ Dependence of plant nutrient concentration on applied nutrient is obtained by the combination of equations (1) and (4), N c ¼ N u Y ¼ N 1 þ epðb y C n NÞ cm 1 þ epðb n C n NÞ where N cm ¼ A n /A y is maimum plant nutrient concentration at high applied nutrient, g kg 1. Because in practice B n. B y always holds, it can be shown that N c is bounded by N cl, N c, N cm, where the lower limit of N c for highly depleted soil nutrient level (N 0) is defined from equation (8) as ð8þ N cl ¼ N cm epð DBÞ ð9þ It follows from equation (3) that as N u! 0, N c! N cl ¼ K n /Y m. Substitution of equations (5) and (6) into this ratio leads to equation (9). As defined by the physical system, the quantities Y, N u, N c, A y, A n, and C n are all positive. Parameters B y and B n may be positive, zero, or negative. Convergence of equation (8) requires that B n. B y. It should be noted that N, 0 would correspond to reduced (depleted) soil nutrient by some means; more on this point later. The logistic model has been shown to be mathematically well behaved (Overman 1995). In other words Y, N u, and N c are monotone increasing functions that are bounded by 0, Y, A y, 0, N u, A n, and N cl, N c, N cm. All of these relations seem intuitively correct. In this article, we attempt to clarify dependence of model parameters on plant characteristics. Data from a field study with response of corn to applied nitrogen for three plant-population densities are analyzed. The variables and parameters in the model (with the eception of B y and B n, which are dimensionless) can be defined on a per plant basis and then converted to an area basis. Lowercase symbols are used for the per plant basis.

1160 DATA ANALYSIS Data for this analysis are taken from a field study by Rhoads and Stanley (1979) at Quincy, Florida. Corn (cv Pioneer 3369A) was planted on Ruston loamy fine sand (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Typic Paleudult) on March 4, 1977. Plant population densities of 3, 6, and 9 plants m were obtained by varying drill spacing on 76-cm rows. Fertilizer was applied at rates of 0, 0.5, 1.0,.0, 3.0, and 5.0 g plant 1 with a fied ratio of (N P K ¼ 1 0.3 0.8). Irrigation of.5 cm was applied to all plots when the soil moisture tension at the 15-cm depth reached 0 centibars. All plots were replicated four times. Plant samples were collected 87 days after planting. Results are given in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1 for dry matter (y), plant N uptake (n u ), and plant N concentration (n c ) in response to applied nitrogen (n) at the three population densities. Phase plots (y and n c vs. n u ) Table 1. Response of corn to applied nitrogen and plant population density at Quincy, FL (1977) a n (g plant 1 ) y (g plant 1 ) n u (g plant 1 ) n c (g kg 1 ) 3 plants m 0 300 3.07 10. 0.5 60.37 9.1 1 97 3.30 11.1 300 3.73 1.4 3 347 4.57 13. 5 347 5.40 15.6 6 plants m 0 167 1.3 7.4 0.5 183 1.68 9. 1 4.53 10.5 40.78 11.6 3 43 3.40 14.0 5 7 4.10 15.1 9 plants m 0 13 0.98 7.9 0.5 130 1.00 7.7 1 183 1.70 9.3 183.9 1.5 3 193.66 13.7 5 07 3.9 15.9 a Data adapted from Rhoads and Stanley (1979).

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1161 Figure 1. Response of seasonal dry matter yield (y), plant N uptake (n u ), and plant N concentration (n c ) to applied nitrogen (n) at three population densities for corn at Quincy, FL. Data adapted from Rhoads and Stanley (1979). Curves drawn from Equations (1), (4), and (8) with parameters from Table 4. are shown in Figure. The first step is to calibrate equation (3) from the data, which leads to the phase equations: 3 plants m : n c ¼ k n y m þ 1 y m n u ¼ 4:07 þ :10n u ; r ¼ 0:9886 ð10þ

116 Figure. Phase plots (y and n c vs. n u ) at three population densities for corn at Quincy, FL. Data adapted from Rhoads and Stanley (1979). Lines drawn from equations (10), (1), and (14); curves drawn from equations (11), (13), and (15). 6 plants m : 9 plants m : y ¼ y mn u ¼ 0:475n u ð11þ k n þ n u 1:94 þ n u n c ¼ k n y m þ 1 y m n u ¼ 4:3 þ :70n u ; r ¼ 0:9889 ð1þ y ¼ y mn u k n þ n u ¼ 0:370n u 1:57 þ n u ð13þ n c ¼ k n y m þ 1 y m n u ¼ 4:0 þ 3:60n u ; r ¼ 0:990 ð14þ y ¼ y mn u k n þ n u ¼ 0:78n u 1:1 þ n u ð15þ

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1163 where high correlation coefficients, r ffi 0.99, may be noted. The lines in Figure are drawn from equations (10), (1), and (14); the curves are drawn from equations (11), (13), and (15). The model describes the pattern in the data rather well. The intercepts in Figure are very close together (averaging approimately 4.1 g kg 1 ), which represent the value of n cl.by visual inspection of Figure 1 it appears that n cm ffi 17.0 g kg 1. It follows from equation (9) that Db ¼ ln(17.0/4.1) ¼ 1.4. This value is substituted into equations (5) and (6) to obtain estimates of logistic parameters a y and a n. Results of these calculations are listed in Table. The net step is to estimate parameters b n and c n for each population density. Equation (1) can be written in the linearized form z ¼ ln a n 1 ¼ b n c n n n u ð16þ Calculations of z vs. n are listed in Table 3 for each population density. Further analysis then leads to the regression equations: 3 plants m : z ¼ ln 6:09 1 ¼ b n c n n ¼ 0:337 0:467n; n u r ¼ 0:9657 ð17þ 6 plants m : z ¼ ln 4:93 1 ¼ b n c n n ¼ 0:84 0:51n; n n 9 plants m : z ¼ ln 3:51 1 ¼ b n c n n ¼ 1:003 0:745n; n u r ¼ 0:9737 ð18þ r ¼ 0:990 ð19þ Table. Calibration of the logistic model for corn at Quincy, FL Population (plants m ) 3 6 9 n cl (g kg 1 ) 4.1 4.1 4.1 n cm (g kg 1 ) 17.0 17.0 17.0 Db 1.4 1.4 1.4 y m (g plant 1 ) 475 370 78 k n (g plant 1 ) 1.94 1.57 1.1 a y (g plant 1 ) 360 81 11 a n (g plant 1 ) 6.09 4.93 3.51

1164 Table 3. Estimation of logistic model parameters for corn at Quincy, FL 3 plants m 6 plants m 9 plants m n (g plant 1 ) n u (g plant 1 ) z n (g plant 1 ) n u (g plant 1 ) z n (g plant 1 ) n u (g plant 1 ) z 0 3.07 0.016 0 1.3 þ1.10 0 0.98 þ0.948 0.5.37 þ0.451 0.5 1.68 þ0.660 0.5 1.00 þ0.90 1 3.30 0.168 1.53 0.053 1 1.70 þ0.063 3.73 0.458.78 0.57.9 0.630 3 4.57 1.10 3 3.40 0.799 3.66 1.14 5 5.40.06 5 4.10 1.60 5 3.9.71

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1165 It is now convenient to write equation (1) in the equivalent form, n u ¼ a n 1 þ ep½ðn 0 1= nþ=n0 Š ð0þ where the new logistic parameters are defined by n 0 ¼ 1 c n n 0 1= ¼ b n ¼ b n n 0 c n ð1þ ðþ In this case n 0 is characteristic N, g plant 1, and n 0 1/ is applied N to reach 50% of maimum plant N uptake, g plant 1. It follows that applied N to reach 50% of maimum yield, n 1/, is defined by n 1= ¼ b y c n ¼ b y n 0 ð3þ A summary of logistic parameters is listed in Table 4 and plotted in Figure 3. Because parameters a y, a n, and n 0 appear to decrease eponentially, we assume eponential relationships with plant population density, plants m, of the form w ¼ ln a y ¼ 5:93 0:00731 ; r ¼ 0:9949 ð4þ w ¼ ln a n ¼ 1:87 0:00764 ; r ¼ 0:999954 ð5þ w ¼ ln n 0 ¼ 0:855 0:00669 ; r ¼ 0:9817 ð6þ Table 4. Dependence of model parameters on plant population density for corn at Quincy, FL Population (plants m ) 3 6 9 a n (g plant 1 ) 6.09 4.93 3.51 a y (g plant 1 ) 360 81 11 b n 0.34 0.8 1.00 b y 1.08 0.60 0.4 c n (plants g ) 0.467 0.51 0.745 n 0 (g plant 1 ).14 1.95 1.34 n 0 1/ (g plant 1 ) 0.73 1.60 1.34 n 1/ (g plant 1 ).33 1.17 0.56

1166 Figure 3. Dependence of logistic parameters a y, a n,andn 0 on plant population density (, plantsm ) for corn at Quincy, FL. Curves drawn from equations (35) through (37). which leads to a y ¼ 376 ep 1 8:7 a n ¼ 6:51 ep 1 8:09 n 0 ¼ :36 ep 1 8:65 ð7þ ð8þ ð9þ

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1167 Because the eponential coefficients are similar numerically, we now proceed to optimize parameters in equations (7) through (9) as shown in Table 5. The nine decimal fractions, f, are used to estimate an overall eponential coefficient from ln f ¼ 0:000617 0:0071 ; r ¼ 0:9895 ð30þ f ¼ 1:00 ep 1 8:33 ð31þ Intercept values of the parameters (a y0, a n0, n0) 0 are now calculated from a y0 ¼ a y ep þ 1 8:33 ð3þ a n0 ¼ a n ep þ 1 8:33 ð33þ n 0 0 ¼ n0 ep þ 1 8:33 ð34þ Values are then averaged over plant populations as shown in Table 5, which leads to overall equations a y ¼ 376 ep 1 g plant 1 ð35þ 8:33 a n ¼ 6:40 ep 1 g plant 1 ð36þ 8:33 n 0 ¼ :41 ep 1 g plant 1 ð37þ 8:33 Table 5. Optimization of model parameters on plant population density for corn at Quincy, FL Population (plants m ) 3 6 9 avg a n 6.09 4.93 3.51 a y (g plant 1 ) 360 81 11 n 0.14 1.95 1.34 a n /6.51 0.935 0.757 0.539 a y /376 0.957 0.747 0.561 n 0 /.36 0.907 0.86 0.568 a no 6.50 6.39 6.30 6.40 a yo (g plant 1 ) 384 364 379 376 no 0.8.53.41.41

1168 The curves in Figure 3 are drawn from equations (35) through (37). These three parameters can now be converted to an area basis by multiplying by the plant density to obtain A y ¼ a y ¼ 3:76 ep 1 Mg ha 1 ð38þ 8:33 A n ¼ a n ¼ 64:0 ep 1 kg ha 1 ð39þ 8:33 N 0 ¼ n 0 ¼ 4:1 ep 1 kg ha 1 ð40þ 8:33 Results are shown in Figure 4. It can be shown that these curves reach a peak at p ¼ 8.33 plants m. It follows from equations () and (3) that DN 1= N 0 ¼ Dn 1= n 0 ¼ Db ð41þ which leads to DN 1= ¼ N1= 0 N 1= ¼ Db N 0 ¼ 34: ep 1 ð4þ 8:33 Values of N1/ 0 and N 1/ are shown in Figure 5. It appears that both trends converge to 100 kg ha 1 as! 0. To incorporate this fact and to be consistent with equation (4), we choose N1= 0 ¼ 44: ep 1 100 ð43þ 8:33 N 1= ¼ 10:0 ep 1 100 ð44þ 8:33 The curves in Figure 5 are drawn from equations (43) and (44). It follows that DN 1/ is dependent on plant population density, with the value ranging from 0 as! 0 to 17 kg ha 1 for ¼ 8.33 plants m. DISCUSSION The logistic model provides a reasonable description of corn response to applied N at the three plant populations of the study (Figure 1), and the phase plots follow the predicted form of the model rather well (Figure ). Because it appears from the analysis that lower and upper limits of plant N concentration are independent of plant population, it is possible to estimate the linear logistic parameters a y and a n from hyperbolic parameters y m and k n (Table ). The eponential logistic parameters b y, b n, and c n are

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1169 Figure 4. Dependence of logistic parameters A y, A n, and N 0 on plant population density (, plants m ) for corn at Quincy, FL. Curves drawn from equations (38) through (40). estimated from the response data (Table 4). Logistic parameters are then converted from a per plant basis to per area basis (Table 6). A major challenge of this analysis is to relate model parameters to plant population density. Parameters a y,a n, and n 0 all ehibit a decreasing trend with increasing plant population (Figure 3). This clearly represents competition among plants as the number increases. It may be noted that for a row spacing of 76 cm, drill spacing is approimately 45 cm for a population density of 3 plants m and 15 cm for a population density of 9 plants m.

1170 Figure 5. Dependence of logistic parameters N 1/ and N1/ 0 on plant population density (, plants m ) for corn at Quincy, FL. Curves drawn from equations (43) and (44). Therefore, a competition function is needed to provide quantitative coupling of the parameters with plant population. Although many mathematical functions could be chosen for this purpose, we have chosen the Gauss equation: p ¼ p 0 ep 1 ð45þ s where p o ¼ intercept parameter p(a y, a n, or n 0 ) at ¼ 0 and s ¼ spread parameter for the distribution. Note that and s have the same units. It may be noted that s represents the inflection point of the Gaussian curve by including the factor of 1/. Equation (45) is chosen because it reflects low competition at low population densities and remains positive for all, which seems intuitively correct. This relationship provides ecellent correlation of parameters A y, A n, and N 0 with plant population (Figure 4). Peak values occur at ¼ s ¼ 8.33 plants m. This also seems intuitively correct, because it appears likely that production would decrease with overcrowding of plants. Linking intercept parameters N 1/ and N1/ 0 to plant population Table 6. Summary of model parameters on plant population density for corn at Quincy, FL Population (plants m ) A y (Mg ha 1 ) A n (kg ha 1 ) N 0 (kg ha 1 ) N 1/ (kg ha 1 ) N 0 1/ (kg ha 1 ) 3 10.8 183 64. 70 6 16.9 96 117 70 96 9 19.0 316 11 50 11

Corn Response to Nitrogen and Plant Density 1171 proved more difficult because values can be positive, zero, or negative. The lower limit on both parameters proved to be 100 kg ha 1 as! 0 (Figure 5). This value reflects the background level of available soil N, which is believed to derive from grass sod on the field prior to the eperiment of Rhoads and Stanley (1979). The Gaussian function provided reasonable correlation with plant population through equations (43) and (44). It can be concluded that all parameters in the logistic model are dependent on plant population. However, near the optimum population of 8.3 plants m, the parameters are relatively insensitive to changes in plant population (Figures 4 and 5). Greatest sensitivity occurs at populations near zero, as might be epected. Finally, a comment on the issue of validation: It is believed that the etended logistic model has been clearly validated as a useful mathematical description of plant response to nutrient input (Overman and Scholtz 00). On the other hand, particular numbers have not been validated for parameters, as these may depend upon plant and soil characteristics. In this view, there is a wide distinction between the two. Many mathematical models in physics have been shown to give reasonable approimations to observations (Kepler s laws of planetary motion, Galileo s law of falling bodies, Newton s laws of dynamics and of gravitation, Einstein s laws of relativity, Planck s law of black body radiation, Schrödinger s wave equation, etc.). In contrast to this are the universal constants (gravitational constant, G; speed of light, c; charge of the electron, e; Planck s constant of action, h; Boltzmann s constant, k; Avogadro s constant, N 0 ), which have been discussed by Sheldrake (1995, chapter 6). At the present state of knowledge in crop science, the search is more toward laws or models of physical processes than toward universal constants. This article has described the relationship of model parameters to plant characteristics (as measured by population density). Work is under way to relate these parameters to soil characteristics as well. To insist that all of this be accomplished before a given model can be published is to ignore 400 years of history in science. Progress is made on an incremental basis rather than in one grand sweep. The search for the unifying theory of everything is still in progress in physics (Greene 1999; Gribbin 1995). To understand some things in science does not require that we understand everything (Green 004). REFERENCES Greene, B. (1999) The Elegant Universe; W.W. Norton: New York. Greene, B. (004) The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Teture of Reality; Alfred A. Knopf: New York. Gribbin, J. (1995) Schrödinger s Kittens and the Search for Reality; Little, Brown: New York. Overman, A.R. (1995) Rational basis for the logistic model for forage grasses. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18: 995 101.

117 Overman, A.R. and Scholtz, R.V., III (00) Mathematical Models of Crop Growth and Yield; Marcel Dekker: New York. Rhoads, F.M. and Stanley, R.L. (1979) Effect of population and fertility on nutrient uptake and yield components of irrigated corn. Soil Crop Science Society of Florida Proceedings, 38: 78 81. Sheldrake, R. (1995) Seven Eperiments that Could Change the World; Riverhead Books: New York.