Analysis of Fluorine by nuclear reactions and application to human dental enamel

Similar documents
FLUORINE IN WATER AND TEETH MEASURED WITH PIGE

APPLICATION OF THE NUCLEAR REACTION ANALYSIS FOR AGING INVESTIGATIONS

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Electron Rutherford Backscattering, a versatile tool for the study of thin films

in2p , version 1-28 Nov 2008

PHYSICS 359E: EXPERIMENT 2.2 THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT: RESONANT ABSORPTION OF (-RAYS

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

1. Nuclear Size. A typical atom radius is a few!10 "10 m (Angstroms). The nuclear radius is a few!10 "15 m (Fermi).

Chapter 4 Scintillation Detectors

Analysis of Cadmium (Cd) in Plastic Using X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Nuclear Cross-Section Measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Application of IR Raman Spectroscopy

The wavefunction ψ for an electron confined to move within a box of linear size L = m, is a standing wave as shown.

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW POSITRON LIFETIME SPECTROSCOPY TECHNIQUE FOR DEFECT CHARACTERIZATION IN THICK MATERIALS

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 19 Chapter 12. Chem 4631

Revision Guide. Chapter 7 Quantum Behaviour

English CPH E-Book Theory of CPH Section 2 Experimental Foundation of CPH Theory Hossein Javadi

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Announcements. Lecture 8 Chapter. 3 Wave & Particles I. EM- Waves behaving like Particles. The Compton effect (Arthur Compton 1927) Hypothesis:

Chapter V: Interactions of neutrons with matter

Physics Dept. PHY-503-SEMESTER 112 PROJECT. Measurement of Carbon Concentration in Bulk Hydrocarbon Samples

Oslo Cyclotron Laboratory

PoS(ENAS 6)050. Resonances in 19 Ne with relevance to the astrophysically important 18 F(p,α) 15 O reaction

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

RICE UNIVERSITY GAMMA-RAY SPECTRA FROM BE 3 AND N 1^ WITH C 12. Hsin-Min Kuan A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Mossbauer Effect and Spectroscopy. Kishan Sinha Xu Group Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Nebraska-Lincoln

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Nuclear Physics. (PHY-231) Dr C. M. Cormack. Nuclear Physics This Lecture

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy - A non-destructive method for material testing -

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association POB 1533, D Garching, Germany

Reference literature. (See: CHEM 2470 notes, Module 8 Textbook 6th ed., Chapters )

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

Silver Thin Film Characterization

Lewis 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

A Measurement of Monoenergetic Neutrons from 9 Be(p,n) 9 B

Fundamentals of Nanoscale Film Analysis

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Conclusion. 109m Ag isomer showed that there is no such broadening. Because one can hardly

A Comparison between Channel Selections in Heavy Ion Reactions

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

APEX CARE INSTITUTE FOR PG - TRB, SLET AND NET IN PHYSICS

Chapter 10: Wave Properties of Particles

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Spectral Resolution. Spectral resolution is a measure of the ability to separate nearby features in wavelength space.

Studies on 3D Fusion Reactions in TiDx under Ion Beam Implantation

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY IN AIR (PESA)

Skoog Chapter 6 Introduction to Spectrometric Methods

object objective lens eyepiece lens

Development of a Dosimetric System using Spectrometric Technique suitable for Operational Radiation Dose Measurements and Evaluation

Electron probe microanalysis - Electron microprobe analysis EPMA (EMPA) What s EPMA all about? What can you learn?

Exercise 1 Atomic line spectra 1/9

Spectroscopy on Mars!

Chem 434 Instrumental Analysis Test 1

Neutron activation analysis. Contents. Introduction

An introduction to Neutron Resonance Densitometry (Short Summary)

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

1 P a g e h t t p s : / / w w w. c i e n o t e s. c o m / Physics (A-level)

CHAPTER 12 TEST REVIEW

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

Dept. of Physics, MIT Manipal 1

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Physics 221B Spring 2012 Notes 42 Scattering of Radiation by Matter

1. Introduction. Etim I.P. 1, William E. S. 2, Ekwe S.O. 3. Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY

λ = h = h p mv λ = h mv FXA 2008 Candidates should be able to :

Lecture 5: Characterization methods

SUPER-ABSORPTION CORRELATION BETWEEN DEUTERIUM FLUX AND EXCESS HEAT

is the minimum stopping potential for which the current between the plates reduces to zero.

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF


PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

Doping of Silicon with Phosphorus Using the 30 Si(p, g) 31 P Resonant Nuclear Reaction

Chapter VIII: Nuclear fission

Chapters 28 and 29: Quantum Physics and Atoms Questions & Problems

Technical University of Denmark

Spectroscopy of light exotic nuclei using resonance scattering in inverse kinematics.

Electromagnetic waves

Brightness and Coherence of Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron Lasers. Zhirong Huang SLAC, Stanford University May 13, 2013

Electron Microprobe Analysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy

NEW CORRECTION PROCEDURE FOR X-RAY SPECTROSCOPIC FLUORESCENCE DATA: SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENT

Determination of the boron content in polyethylene samples using the reactor Orphée

H2 Physics Set A Paper 3 H2 PHYSICS. Exam papers with worked solutions. (Selected from Top JC) SET A PAPER 3.

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

Depth Distribution Functions of Secondary Electron Production and Emission

4. Inelastic Scattering

1 Introduction COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. 1.1 HowdoweDefinetheSurface?

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 1. Title: Neutron Life Cycle

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

SCINTILLATION DETECTORS AND PM TUBES

Unit 11 Instrumentation. Mass, Infrared and NMR Spectroscopy

SECTION A Quantum Physics and Atom Models

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 11: Jan. 27 th Sunil Sinha UCSD Physics

Transcription:

~&C-T\<X=>S>JJ, FACULTES UNIVEtSITAJKES NOTIE-DAME DE LA PAIX NAMUft Analysis of Fluorine by nuclear reactions and application to human dental enamel Rapport L. A. R. N. 754 J. Stroobants F. Bodtft G. Dtcominck G. Dtmortwr G. Med a» L. A. R. N. Rut Muztt, 22 5000-Namur (felgiqu*) T. 081/73é.9f

Analysis of Fluorine by nuclear reactions and application to human dental enamel Rapport L A. R. N. 754 J. Stroobonts F. Bodart G. Decominck G. Demortier G. Nicolas

1. ANALYSIS Or FLUORINE BY NUCLEAR REACTIONS AND APPLICATION TO HUITAN DENTAL ENAMEL. J. STROOBANTS, F. BODART, G. DECONNINCK. G. OEMORTIER and G.NICOLAS (x). L.A.R.N., Facultés Universitaires, B-500D NAMUR (Belgium), (x) Université de Louvain, B-3000 LEUVEN (Belgium). Abstract : Nuclear reactions induced on Fluorine by low energy protons are investigated, thick targ et excitation yield curves and tables for 19 F(p.p' 6 Y ) 19 F and ^FCp.ciY) 1 0 reactions are given between 0.3 and 2.5 MeV. Interferences from other nuclear reactions, detection and sensitivity for Fluorine detection are investigated. limits After a wide investigation of the repartition of Fluorine in tooth enamel it is concluded that there is an equilibrum of the concentrations between tooth and saliva which is rapidly restored after the perturbation introduced by the external treatments.

2. I. PROMPT GAMMA-RAYS FROM PROTON BOMBARDMENT OF FLUORIDE SAMPLES. The technique of Fluorine analysis by low energy nuclear reaction has often been described 12 3 and the application to Fluorine concentration determination is now routinely used in different laboratories. An intense gamma-tay emission is observed when Fluorine is bombarded with low energy protons :» a] low energy gamma-rays from inelastic scattering (Ey 110 and 197 KeV). b) high energy gamma-rays from (p,ay) reactions (EY 6.13, 6.72 and 7.12 MeV). At low energy isolated resonances in the cross-section curves can be used for depth profile analysis, at higher energy the resonances overlap and cross sections are monotonie function of the proton energy. The y-ray yield from a thick sample of CaF^ was detected at different proton energy, the data were corrected fur.tapping power and concentrations, in order to correspond to a sample of pure Fluorine. The number of gamma-rays emitted by an homogeneous thick sample bombarded with protons of energy E is then given by M = M c. S[E) {yc x Sterad.)" 1 M) S Y * S (Ê) s where N is the number of gamma-rays detected at energy E. o N is the number given in the table. C is the concentration of Fluorine in the sample. 5(E) and S_(E) are the stopping power parameter of Fluorine of th 2 sample [in f1ev/g cm ) and of the standard, respectively. É is the proton energy for which the yield has half the value it has at energy E.

3. For bulk analysis the sample is bombarded with 2.5 MeV protons, Y~rays are detected in a Ge-Li detector for low energy y-rays. in a large Nal scintillator for high energy gamma-rays. The concentration is obtained by comparison with a standard by 4 application of the following formula N S (Ê) St N st S < ] st The accuracy of the determination was tested by making calibration curves with standard samples and also by comparing the results obtained by this technique with chemical determinations on sample of unknown composition. The absolute accuracy is better than 1* for concentration larger than 0,001, the sensitivity limit for quantitative determination is about 1 p.p.m. 1) * 9 F[p,p'y) I9 F reaction. Two gamma-ray lines are observed in spectra from the 19 F(p,p'y)' 9 F reaction, they correspond to Ey = 110 kev and Ey * 197 kev, the thick sample yield is the same for both radiations for 2 MeV protons, above this energy the 197 kev gamma-ray emission is more Intense. A complete tabulation of the thick target excitation yield is given in Table I and thy corresponding excitation curves are represented on fig.1-2. From these data, the number of gammarays from bombardment of a given sample can be predicted by using formula (1). A narrow resonance is present at E R 938 kev (r_-4.5kev) The corresponding plateau is clearly visible in the excitation curve, below this energy the reaction is not very intense, adove this energy the excitation yield curve reveal3 the presence of many resonances superposed to a continuous amplitude.

5. A serious handicap in the utilization of these gamma-rays for quantitative analysis is the presence of an important continuous spectrum from higher energy gamma-rays(compton effect), this effect can be reduced by using a high resolution Ge-Li detector (1 KeV) of small thickness. The estimated sensitivity limit is then 1Q p.p.m. A possible first order interference is the 18 0(p.y) 19 F reaction with the emission of 197 kev gamma-rays, the intensity is very small and does not affect seriously the determinations even in presence of large concentrations of oxygen. The emission of 110keV gamma-ray was not observt-j in the bombardment of oxygen with.'. f.-jv protons. This interference can be resolved in two ways : a) by measuring the ratio NyMlO kev)/nym97 kev) which must be identical for a Fluorine standard and for the sample, this ratio is also obtained from Table I. b) by measuring the intensity of the 495 kev gamma-ray yield from the 16 0(p,y) 17 F reaction for 2.2 MeV protons. The number of 197 kev gamma-rays from the interfering reaction is then given by NyM97keV 0.5 N-y(495 kev). 2) 19 F(p,ay) 16 0 reaction. Several lines are seen in the spectra from the * 9 F(p,ay)' 6 reaction detected with a large volume (30c.c.) Ge-Li detector (fig.4), they correspond to full energy, one-escape and two-escape peaks 0f the 6.131, 6.916 and 7.115 MeV gamma-rays. The more intense is the 6.131 MeV group y-, the two other groups y,. and >2 nave comparable intensity and are strongly affected by Doppler effects, the life-time 1 R of the corresponding levels in 0 being short enough for disintegration to take place before slowing down in the sample. A complete tabul ation of the thick target yield is available while the corresponding excitation curves are represented on fig.3. Many resonances are presen and can be used for depth profile analysis, the step height I R of the corresponding platbau in the excitation curve is proportional to the product of of the cross-section at resonance by the FWHM T. The following narrow resonances are currently used for depth profile analysis. *

E tkev) P 330 340 350 375 400 450 475 465 495 520 570 595 620 645 660 670 660 690 740 780 790 820 B30 635 845 87 0 890 900 910 6-7 MeV 1.0 5.5 5.7 5.9 6.1 6.5 6.8 6.3 8.3 9.0 10.2 13.7 16.1 18.2 20.7 28.5 28.5 30.5 31.7 32.0 32.4 35.4 37.2 38.5 40.4 ' 120.4 166.1 175.7 179. E (kev) o 920 93 5 950 98Ü 1030 1080 1090 1105 1 130 1156 1210 1250 1263 1280 1290 1315 1325 1335 1345 1350 1365 1375 1400 1420 1430 1475 1550 1600 1610 110 kev 85 317 370 414 443 463 488 491 496 502 580 614 717 778 779 101 5 101 5 101 5 1016 1032 10Ö0 1111 1227 1850 1924 2384 271 5 2759 2760 197 kev _ 156 170 1 71 171 172 230 230 259 274 289 303 304 307 309 319 329 339 349 368 427 466 584 592 596 621 675 705 706 6-7 MeV 185 -^ 234, 259 265 279 286 289 300 312 322 376 399 407 425 437 458 460 463 480 509 554 661 765 798 81 6 868 930 1002 1047 E (kev) P 1640 1 700 1730 1750 1815 1880 1915 1930 1 950 1980 2030 2080 2160 2210 2317 2370 110 kev 2761 301 6 3093 3149 3253 3546 3892 4270 5181 612B 6837 7377 7823 7976 11420 16106 197 kev 736 944 1068 1152 1509 2311 3153 3559 4508 6214 8795 11782 12798 13817 18088 23615 6-7 MeV 1048 1220 1350 1389 1503 1872 21 53 2274 23 6 7 2937 3651 4541 5500 - - - TABLE I. Thick target excitation yield for the (p.p'-y) and (p.ay) reaction on 19 F. The yie\d is given in (yc.ster)" 1 for a pure Fluorine sample. CI

7. FIG.4 E_ ' 340 KeV PC E R = 672 kev 2.4 kev 4.5 kev E R * 935 kev T R * 8.6 kev 6.000 126.000 70.000 None of these resonances has a pure B-W shape, a continuous background being superposed to the resonant amplitude. The gamma-ray intensity from the competiting 15 N(p,y) 16 0 reactions is very small, for 2 MeV proton the ratio (My ( 1 5 N )/Hy I 1 9 F ) is lower than 5 10 J. Another interference from Nitrogen is possible when low resolution detectors are used, it originates from the 1If N(p,Y) 15 0 reaction giving a gamma-ray peaks emission of 6,79 MeV without appreciable Doppler broadening. The presence of Nitrogen can be detected by the observation of 4.43 MeV gamma-rays from the 15 N(p,av) 12 C reaction, the intensity being 100 times higher than for the 6,79 MeV radiation above 2.5 MeV.

fl. 3) Depth profile analysis. The energy spread in the proton beam, the resonance width and the energy straggling in the sample determine the depth resolution in profile analysis. The depth resolution at the surface of the sample (small energy loss} must be calculated using Vavilov distributions, in Fluorine analysis the resonances have large width and the distributions are strongly modified by convolution with the resonance -4-2 curve» for large depth (x > 10 g cm ) the resulting distribution can be considered as gaussian-like, the FWHM is given for normal incidence by : where : y r - A 2 r r* o R s is the FWHH of the beam energy distribution. r is the natural width, K F is the straggling width given by : r = 0.93 z Vxi/l s The maximum depth and thickness that can be analysed depends on the energy of neighbouring resonances. The lower energy neighbouring resonance position determines the maximum sample thickness s which can be analysed while the high energy neighbour determines the maximum depth x which can be analysed. The following K max * *- resonances can be used for depth profile analysis, the given parameters correspond to tooth enamel which is equivalent to a pure Silicon matrix. E R (kev) 340 872 935 1373 r^(kev) 2.4 4.7 8.1 12.4 W 375 189 183 145 X max (3.2 10-4 ) -4 (3.3 10" 4 ) (1.8 10" 4 ) S max 3.2 10" 4 3,3 10" 4 3.3 10" 4 1.8 10" 4 Resolution (x-x ) max 3.4 10~ 5 6.8 10" 5 8.4 10~ 5 1.0 10" 4

9. All these data are given in g cm -2. the resonance energy and width are given in the laboratory system. From fig.3 it is concluded that the 872 KeV resonance is the more intense, the maximum depth can be analysed without interfering with the 935 KeV resonance is -5-2 6.6 10 g cm or about 1.3ym in tooth enamel. II. TOOTH ENAMEL ANALYSIS. 1} The sample structure. The important problem of dental caries following the dissolution of the enamel structure under the action of acid substances was studied for many years by means of different techniques, the Fluorine ion being supposedly playing an important action in the inhibition of enamel dental caries. The dental enamel is at 95% a layer of apatite, 500pm thick, in which the OH radical is partly substitued by Fluorine ions giving a concentration of 1 to 5V of Fluorine. Nuclear resonance is an unvaluable probe in dental enamel analysis since X-ray techniques (electron microprobe) are subject to errors from strong absorption of the soft X-ray radiation another advantage is the possibility of non destructive depth profile analysis with very small diameter beams. NKR studies indicate that the Fluorine ion would migrate along the C axis of the hydroxyapatite crystal, preventing further migration of OH ions. However the enamel structure is very different from the single crystal model. X-ray diffraction spectra show a widening of X-ray lines which Indicates that the sample is a superposition of o cristallltes the size of which ranges between 300 and 400 A. The intervals between these crlstallites is filled by an organic network

10, in which the "F ion can migrate. For these reasons the measurements have to be done on tooth enamel rather than on apatite crystals and thry should reproduce as close as possible the conditions of real life. 2) Experimental method. Teeth are bombarded with the proton beam from the 3 WeV L.A.R.N. Van de Graaff accelerator, very small beam currents are used in order to reduce radiation damage effects. The sample is sealed on an Aluminium frame» the tooth enamel being an excellent insolator, the distance between the beam spot and the Aluminium was kept as small as possible, even so, important charge effects are observed. In an excitation curve taken on the 872 kev resonance, the step corresponding to the resonance is shifted toward higher proton energies, shifts as high as 15 kev are observed. This effect is due to the accumulation of electric charges in surface increasing the local potential on the target, the protons are then slowed down before reacting the surface. This effect is impossible to eliminate completely, fortunately, the shift is constant when the samples are bombarded in same experimental conditions, a permanent shift of 10 kev being present in all the measurements (fig.5). The 872 kev resonance in the 19 F(p,c*Y) 16 0 reaction was chcosen because of the high intensity of this reaction, it is not the best resor.once for deep analysis but in the case of tooth the Fluorine concentration gradient is large at the surface and the influence of the lower energy resonance is small, on the other hand the observed diffusion region in enamel does not exceed 1ym in thickness. Excitation curves are measured on each sample in order to obtain the Fluorine concentration after various treatments. The surface of each tooth is divided into three regions t;ie first is left rough, the second is polished with pumice paste ir order to remove a surface layer of about 100pm(P), the third region is polished and then treated with different fluoridated products IP*F), all these treatments are done in vivo. Thi; tooth is left in mouth for a given

f 2.3 "3 >( R «,)T0 E R = 872keV Excitation yield a> Surface concentration of F in teeth A Powdered.2 A Apatite cristal Apatite Graphite E I» 3 Z //. Decidious fa Resonance Shift '<> %.F -1 u f 8 SO 860 870.. I I I p IQ.5 B, fl0 E p kev F IG.6 MY J J

12. time and then extracted before analysis. Each region is analysed for Fluorine concentration and the results are compared. The Fluorine concentration is extremely variable from tooth to tooth and only average results may have a signification. For tr,ir> reason a great number of data must be obtained before drawing conclusions. 3 ) Measurements. A number of teeth was first explored in order to detect systematic effects in Fluorine distributions. A beam spot of 100pm was used ar,j a scanning was made across the different surface regions, strong concentration variations are observed which are found to be purely random so that only average values are meaningful 1. Average values are obtained by using a 500um diameter beam spot, and by moving the sample back and forth during the measurement. A systematic study of concentration in more than 150 untreated teeth of different origins has revealed that the Fluorine concentration distribution is skew with an average value of 0,25% for normal teeth and 0,15Î for decidious teeth I milk-teeth). (fig.6). For depth profile analysis the 872 kev resonance was used with detection of the high energy gamma-rays in a 4"x3" Nal scintillator. In order to evaluate straggling effects the distributions obtained by making the convolution product of the Vavilov distributions with the Breit Wigner distribution of 4.8 kev FWHM was calculated for different energy losses. The results of this calculation are presented in fig.7, they are used for unfolding of the excitation yield curves. T he Fluorine distribution is obtained by using trial profile concentrations and taking the "convolution" product with the distributions of fig.7. The results are given in fig.8-9 where the profile curves corresponding to an average determination on 17 teeth are given. In a first run (fig.8) teeth are treated and extracted after what they are analysed by taking excitation curves at resonance on a 50 KeV energy range on the two regions. No appreciable concentration modifications are observed when extracted teeth are kept in

13. a dry atmosphere for a long time. The curves in fig.b show that in the treated region a large enrichment in Fluorine is detected on a depth of 0.1 to 0.3urn. (the firi,. ''.lym being uncertain, the concentration is represented by a dashed ine). In a second run of measurements, teeth are left in mouth during 10 days before extraction, no appreciable difference is detected between polished and fluoridated regions (fig.9). A similar phenomenon was observed when teeth are Kept in distilled water. 4) Conclusion. Fluorine migration in teeth enamel is observed when the rough surface is eliminated by polishing and treatment with different fluoridated compounds (Fluocaril dental frost). This fluoration does not disappear when the tooth is Kept in dry atmosphere. On the contrary the enrichment effect is practically absent after a few days when the tooth is Kept in contact with saliva. It is then supposed that the atoms of Fluorine are eliminated by ion exchange phenomena in saliva. The hypothesis of exchange with Chlorine Jons was made and the CI concentration was measured by X-ray fluorescence induced hy proton, no appreciable variation was observed. A similar phenomenon being observed when teeth are Kept in distilled water, the possibility arises of exchange with OH ions although the migration energy of a F~ ion is only 0.48 ev while it is 2.1 ev for an OH* ion. Another explanation would be that the fluoride ions introduced by the treatment do not appreciably migrate., into the cristallites but would simply be introduced between the cristallites through the organic matrix. A possible test of this hypothesis is to take NMR spectra from enamel powder, unfortunately the concentration is so low that the experiment is beyond the sensitivity limits of this technique.

Fluorine concentration 7o Fluorine concentration 7. _i.5 Extraction after 1 hour treatment Extraction 10 days _i.3 after treatment 1 1 * - 1 \ \ \ - -.5 \ \ Treated - -.5. ^ s ^ ^ Polished ""^V***-*^ Treated '"- r5, dep*" fum),! Polished js depth (pm),1 5 I G. 8 F I Q.,9

15. REFERENCES. E. HOLLER and N. STARFELT, Nucl. Inst, and Methods 5_0 (196?) 225. J.W.MANDLER, R.B. MOLER, E. RAISEN and K.S. RAJAN. Thin Solid Films J_9 (1973) 166-172. I. GOLICHEFF» M. LOEUILLET and Ch. ENGELMAN. Journal of Radioanal. Chemistry. 1j2 (1972) 233-250. G. DECONNINCK.. Journal of Radional. Chem. J_2 (1972) 157-159. G. DECONNINCK. ana Y. FOUILHE. Rapport L.A.R.N. n 755.