Quantum Field Theory III

Similar documents
Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Textbook Problem 4.2: The theory in question has two scalar fields Φ(x) and φ(x) and the Lagrangian. 2 Φ ( µφ) 2 m2

Quantum Field Theory Homework 5

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Lagrangian Field Theory

19 Quantum electrodynamics

The Feynman path integral

Towards a finite conformal QED

Lecture 14: Forces and Stresses

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

Causal Diamonds. M. Aghili, L. Bombelli, B. Pilgrim

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

Colored and electrically charged gauge bosons and their related quarks

Higgs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I

Mechanics Physics 151

Classical Field Theory

Canonical transformations

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

Lecture Notes 7: The Unruh Effect

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

where the sums are over the partcle labels. In general H = p2 2m + V s(r ) V j = V nt (jr, r j j) (5) where V s s the sngle-partcle potental and V nt

763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

Lagrange Multipliers. A Somewhat Silly Example. Monday, 25 September 2013

8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I

Functional Quantization

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

ALGEBRA MID-TERM. 1 Suppose I is a principal ideal of the integral domain R. Prove that the R-module I R I has no non-zero torsion elements.

Robert Eisberg Second edition CH 09 Multielectron atoms ground states and x-ray excitations

Three views of mechanics

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

5.03, Inorganic Chemistry Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Lecture 2 May 11: Ligand Field Theory

PHY688, Statistical Mechanics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 6 Mar 2008

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Lecture 10 Support Vector Machines II

Mechanics Physics 151

Unification Paradigm

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

9 Characteristic classes

Composite Hypotheses testing

Feynman parameter integrals

Modelli Clamfim Equazione del Calore Lezione ottobre 2014

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Note on the Electron EDM

14 The Statement of AdS/CFT

Mechanics Physics 151

Lecture 21: Numerical methods for pricing American type derivatives

Affine and Riemannian Connections

Limited Dependent Variables

Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation with Dirac Matrices in Chiral Representation. V.P.Neznamov RFNC-VNIIEF, , Sarov, Nizhniy Novgorod region

Srednicki Chapter 14

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 3: Classical Model (Studenmund, Chapter 4)

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

Problem 10.1: One-loop structure of QED

Vector Mesons and an Interpretation of Seiberg Duality

Inductance Calculation for Conductors of Arbitrary Shape

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

1 Renormalization of Yukawa theory

One-sided finite-difference approximations suitable for use with Richardson extrapolation

1 Interactions and Green functions

5 Supersymmetric actions: minimal supersymmetry

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Chapter 3 Differentiation and Integration

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Lecture 4: September 12

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

1 Convex Optimization

Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Linear Feature Engineering 11

Module 9. Lecture 6. Duality in Assignment Problems

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

V.C The Niemeijer van Leeuwen Cumulant Approximation

Recursion and growth estimates in quantum field theory

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

Yukawa Potential and the Propagator Term

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

ANSWERS. Problem 1. and the moment generating function (mgf) by. defined for any real t. Use this to show that E( U) var( U)

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

2 More examples with details

Scattering amplitudes in N =4super Yang-Mills

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

Lecture 3: Probability Distributions

Some basic inequalities. Definition. Let V be a vector space over the complex numbers. An inner product is given by a function, V V C

This chapter illustrates the idea that all properties of the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) can be calculated from electron density.

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

Open string operator quantization

Transcription:

Quantum Feld Theory III Prof. Erck Wenberg February 16, 011 1 Lecture 9 Last tme we showed that f we just look at weak nteractons and currents, strong nteracton has very good SU() SU() chral symmetry, and there s also pretty good approxmate SU(3) SU(3) symmetry. But now we know the Lagrangan for QCD If we have some m f = 0 then there s symmetry L QCD = q f (D/ m f )q f 1 4 F a µf aµ (1) q L f U Lq L f, qr f U Rq R f () However why s the symmetry SU(N) nstead of U(N)? One of the U(1) symmetry just corresponds to U L = U R U(1) whch just counts the number of u s and d s. The other U(1) symmetry U L = U R seems to be absent, so t must correspond to a Goldstone boson. So n SU() SU() chral theory we should have a fourth Goldstone boson n addton to the three pons. Now the mass of π s about 135 140 MeV, and the next lght pseudoscalar boson whch has zero strangeness s η whch has mass 549 MeV, whch s too large to be also a Goldstone bosons. nythng else would be heaver and not plausble. So ths s known as the U(1) problem. It s a long story to a resoluton of ths problem. Let s suppose we have a spontaneously broken gauge theory. Frst let s consder gauge propagators, and we use photon for example. The poton propagator s a seres of The frst term s just (g µ q + λqµ q ) q (3) Now the second dagram wthout the legs s, n general Π µ = (q g µ q µ q )Π(q ) (4) whose form s dctated by current conservaton, thus Ward dentty. So f we put n the legs we wll get (g αµ q + λqα q µ ) ( q (q g µ q µ q )(Π) ) (g β q + λq q β ) q = (g αβ q qα q β ) q Π (5) Note that the second term n both of the propagators dot nto the mddle term to gve zero, so they are rrelevant. We can see the thrd term wll be (g αβ q qα q β ) q Π (6) 1

Now we can sum the seres q = q (g αβ qα q β ) Π n + (λ 1) qα q β q (g αβ qα q β ) q n=0 1 1 Π(q ) +... q (7) Because ths s QED the second term n the propagator does not matter, so t s just 1/q. ny pole n ths expresson must come from Π(q ). Say f then the pole wll be at µ and t wll be approxmately mass squared. Let s consder broken U(1) gauge theory Π(q ) = µ q + f(q ) (8) L = 1 4 F µ + D µ φ V ( ϕ ) (9) and the potental has a mnmum at ϕ = /. Let s choose ϕ 1 = and ϕ = 0 then we can defne our feld as ϕ = 1 [ + χ(x) + ψ(x)] (10) then from the potental V there wll be no mass term for ψ, but a mass term for χ. The covarant dervatve wll be Dµ ϕ = µ χ + µ ψ e µ ψ + e µ ( + χ) (11) So the absolute value square s D µ ϕ = 1 [ ( µ χ e µ ψ) + ( µ ψ + e µ + e µ χ) ] (1) Let s extract from ths term the terms quadratc n the felds, and wrte down the Lagrangan for the exctaton felds ψ and χ L = 1 4 F µ + 1 ( µχ) + 1 ( µψ) + 1 e µ + e µ µ ψ V (χ, ψ) +... (13) Now apart from the usual terms we have two pecular terms Now let s look at contrbutons to photon self-energy. The sum s e g µ, eq µ (14) ( g µ q q µ q ) e q (15) So the correcton s n the form of a pole wth photon mass m = e. Note here the mass comes from two very pecular terms and not from ordnary feld mass term.

Now let s wrte the feld n another form ϕ(x) = 1 ( + ρ(x))e ξ(x)/ (16) For small felds ths s essentally the same felds we used before, but thngs dffer n hgher order terms. Now the covarant dervatve s So the absolute value square s D µ ϕ = µ ϕ + e µ ϕ = 1 [ µ ρ + µ ξ ( + ρ D µ ϕ = 1 ( µρ) + 1 ( µξ + e µ ) ( + ρ ) ( )] + ρ + e µ e ξ/ (17) ) = 1 ( µρ) + e ( µ + 1 e µξ) ( 1 + ρ ) (18) Now we can redefne the feld B µ = µ + 1 e µξ (19) Ths s essentally a gauge transformaton, so F µ s not changed. Now the Lagrangan wll look lke L = 1 4 F µ + 1 ( µρ) + e ( Bµ B µ 1 + ρ ) + ρ V ( + ρ) (0) Now the feld ξ totally dsappears, and we have a massve vector feld B µ wth mass m B = e coupled to a massve scalar feld. If we count the degree of freedom we can see that the degree of freedom s 3 + 1 = 4. Now f we had a massless vector and two massve scalars we wll have degree of freedom + = 4, so the degree of freedom matches. What happens here s that the Goldstone boson got eaten by the gauge boson. What we have done above s essentally a gauge transformaton. It s lke takng a gauge condton, but nstead of requrng µ µ = 0 we requre ϕ to be real. Ths s how we elmnated ξ and make the gauge boson massve. Ths s why we obtan a mass term whch volates gauge nvarance: because we have chosen a gauge. Now let s generalze the Yang-Mlls. ϕ l are real scalars wth vacuum expectaton value ϕ l = l, and we have a gauge group G wth acton on the ϕ s δϕ l = β a t a lm ϕ m (1) Note ϕ l forms a representaton of the gauge group and t mght be reducble. Smlar to the above we mpose a gauge condton ϕ l (t a lm m) = 0 () Ths s to requre that the feld s orthogonal to the VEV. Now the covarant dervatve s D µ ϕ l = µ ϕ l a µt a lm ϕ m = µ ϕ l a µt a lm ( m + ϕ m) (3) nd the square s D µ ϕ l = ( µ ϕ l ) + a µ b [ µ t a lm ( m + ϕ m) ] [ t b ln ( n + ϕ n)] ( µ ϕ l )ta lm ( m + ϕ m) a µ (4) 3

Now we use the gauge condton to smplfy the above expresson and we can extract the quadratc terms L = 1 4 F µ + 1 ( µϕ l ) 1 a µ b µ(t a lm m)(t b ln n) V (ϕ ) +... (5) If we wrte the mass term for the gauge feld as 1/ a µ b µ(µ ) ab then the mass matrx s (µ ) ab = (t a lm m)(t b ln n) (6) Suppose some lnear combnaton of generators c a t a s unbroken, then c a t a lm m = 0 and ths corresponds to a zero egenvector of ths mass matrx. Conversely f t has a zero egenvector µ ab c ac b = 0 then we know that c a t a lm m = 0 and ths corresponds to an unbroken symmetry. gan the countng of degree of freedom obvously works. Now we have a bunch of massless or massve vector bosons and some massve scalars wth no Goldstone bosons. Ths gauge choce s called untarty gauge. Ths s because all the partcles appearng n ths gauge are physcal partcles. If we work out the gauge propagator n ths gauge we wll get [ g µ k m + kµ k ] V m (7) V Note that the second term s problematc and we need to cancel them to get renormalzaton to work n loop dagrams. So ths gauge s not a very good choce f we work on renormalzablty. So let s work n R ξ gauge. For smplcty we work n U(1) theory. φ = 1 (φ 1 + φ ) = 1 ( + h(x) + ϕ(x)) (8) Remember we do perturbaton theory by add a gauge-fxng term to the Lagrangan and add a ghost Lagrangan. The gauge-fxng term for R ξ gauge s and the ghost Lagrangan wll be L ghost = c(δg)c = c [ µ µ ξe ( + h) ] c = c The quadratc terms n the full Lagrangan wll be G = 1 ξ ( µ µ eξϕ) (9) [ ξm (1 + h ) ] c (30) L = 1 ( µh) 1 m h h + 1 ( µϕ) 1 m ξϕ 1 4 F µ 1 ξ ( µ µ ) + 1 m µ + m µ µ ϕ + eϕ µ µ + c [ ξm ] (31) c Now the two terms n the second lne wll add up to be a total dervatve of the gauge fxng term and we can throw them away. The propagator for the vector boson s [ k m g µ k ] µk k ξm (1 ξ) (3) 4

The h propagator s just a usual massve propagator, so as ϕ and c. Now when we do perturbaton theory we have three propagators that depend on ξ, namely µ, ϕ, c. However ξ s an arbtrary varable and we expect that all the ξ factors should cancel n our loop calculatons, and ths s an advantage n our calculaton. Ths s called renormalzable gauge, because renormalzaton s easy n ths gauge. If we take the lmt ξ, the vector propagator goes to (g µ k m kµ k ) m (33) The propagators for ϕ and c go to zero, because they are unphyscal partcles. However the couplng between c and h goes to nfnty. nd we have a loop of ghosts and external h legs then the dagram wll gve a fnte contrbuton. So ths s lke untarty gauge wth some funny nteractons,.e. nteracton between arbtrary number of h bosons. These show up n the untarty gauge f we calculate the path ntegral and we wll get some δ 4 (0) terms whch correspond to these nteractons. 5