Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Similar documents
ADVANCED TOPICS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS II Tutorial problem set 2, (20 points in total) Problems are due at Monday,

d 3 k In the same non-relativistic normalization x k = exp(ikk),

Attempts at relativistic QM

Quantization of Scalar Field

The Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem

The Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

Quantum Field Theory II

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

Non-relativistic scattering

2.4 Parity transformation

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

Preliminaries: what you need to know

Prancing Through Quantum Fields

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian:

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

2 Quantization of the scalar field

Why quantum field theory?

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

d 3 xe ipm x φ(x) (2) d 3 x( φ(x)) 2 = 1 2 p n p 2 n φ(p n ) φ( p n ). (4) leads to a p n . (6) Finally, fill in the steps to show that = 1δpn,p m

Finite-temperature Field Theory

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

Quantization of scalar fields

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

Quantization of a Scalar Field

Canonical Quantization C6, HT 2016

Interaction with External Sources

The Hamiltonian operator and states

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1

Vector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Kenzo INOUE

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Mechanics Physics 151

Physics 218. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine. Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

PHY 396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 29, 2011.

Quantum Field Theory. Badis Ydri Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria. December 10, 2012

Canonical Quantization

Lecture 7. More dimensions

Problem 1(a): As discussed in class, Euler Lagrange equations for charged fields can be written in a manifestly covariant form as L (D µ φ) L

General Relativity in a Nutshell

Dirac Equation. Chapter 1

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Green Functions in Many Body Quantum Mechanics

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I PROBLEM SET 2

From Particles to Fields

Introduction to Instantons. T. Daniel Brennan. Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Field Theory. Effects of Instanton- Matter Interactions.

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

1 Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Week 7 Lecture: Concepts of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)

Lecture 7 From Dirac equation to Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories

Quantum Field Theory

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

What is a particle? Keith Fratus. July 17, 2012 UCSB

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

Problem 1(a): Since the Hamiltonian (1) is a function of the particles momentum, the evolution operator has a simple form in momentum space,

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Nonperturbational Continued-Fraction Spin-offs of Quantum Theory s Standard Perturbation Methods

Euclidean path integral formalism: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory

Path integrals and the classical approximation 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 14 November 2011

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Path Integral for Spin

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problems 1 and 2 of set #5.

Decays, resonances and scattering

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Week 1. 1 The relativistic point particle. 1.1 Classical dynamics. Reading material from the books. Zwiebach, Chapter 5 and chapter 11

(Quantum) Fields on Causal Sets

Electrons in a periodic potential

Part III. Interacting Field Theory. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)

Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 2011

Mandl and Shaw reading assignments

LECTURE 3: Quantization and QFT

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field

Holographic construction of CFT excited states. Kostas Skenderis

de Sitter Tachyons (at the LHC Era)

The Quantum to Classical Transition in Inflationary Cosmology

Quantum Field Theory II

Chapter 10 Operators of the scalar Klein Gordon field. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Coherent-state path integrals. The coherent states are complete (indeed supercomplete) and provide for the identity operator the expression

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

Transcription:

Classical field theory 212 (NS-364B Feynman propagator 1. Introduction States in quantum mechanics in Schrödinger picture evolve as ( Ψt = Û(t,t Ψt, Û(t,t = T exp ı t dt Ĥ(t, (1 t where Û(t,t denotes the evolution operator, Û(t,t = 1 ı t ( Ĥ(t dt + ı 2 t dt t t t t dt Ĥ(t Ĥ(t + (2 Ĥ(t is the Hamiltonian operator and T stands for time ordering (since t > t the Hamiltonian operator Ĥ(t in (2 at a later time t is always to the left of the hamiltonial operator Ĥ(t at an earlier time t. The time ordered expression (2 is known as the Dyson series. As the Hamiltonian depends on the fields, when expectation value is taken, the Feyman propagator naturally occurs when one is interested in a quantum mechanical evolution. The Feynman (or time ordered propagator is not causal, which also means that the resulting states are not causal. But that is not a problem, since states in quantum mechanics are not directly observable. As argued in Homework 8, the quantume mechanical evolution of observable quantities, such as expectation values of hermitean operators, are always expressible in terms of causal Green functions, such as the Pauli-Jordan function, or the spectral function. (Bra states evolve according to an anti-time ordered exponential of the Hamiltonian, which are then expressible in terms of the anti-feynman (or anti-time ordered propagator. In these notes, we shall show how to construct the Feynman propagator for a real massless scalar field φ, whose action is given by 1, ( 1 S[φ] = d 4 x 2 ( µφ( ν φη µν. (3 The Feynman (or time ordered propagator F ++ for this free (i.e. non-interacting theory is defined in terms of two point functions as F (x;x = θ(t t + (x;x + θ(t t (x;x (4 where + (x;x + (x;x and (x;x + (x;x are the positive and negative frequency Wightman functions, respectively, defined by ı + (x;x = ˆφ(xˆφ(x, ı + (x;x = ˆφ(x ˆφ(x, (5 where, for an operator Ô(t, Ô(t = Tr[ˆρ(tÔ(t], where ˆρ(t denotes the density operator. When one is dealing with a pure state Ψ, then ˆρ(t = Ψ Ψ, and the averaging simplifies to Ô(t Ψ Ô(t Ψ. 1 In these notes we use c = 1 1

Here I have used a more common notation, according to which the Green functions G s for a scalar field are denoted by s. The field operators in (5 obey a Klein-Gordon equation, and a canonical quantization reads, where the canonical momentum of φ is π L/ φ = t φ. 2 ˆφ(x =, 2 = η µν µ ν, (6 [ˆφ( x,t, ˆπ( x,t] = ıδ 3 ( x x, (7 2. Mode decomposition The field ˆφ can be decomposed into modes by making use of a Fourier transform, d ˆφ(x 3 k = (e ı k x φ(k,tâ (2π 3 k + e ı k x φ (k,tâ k (8 where â k and â k are the usual creation and annihilation operators (for each k there is precisely one pair, you are familiar with from quantum mechanics, and which obey the following commutation relations, [â k,â ] = k (2π3 δ 3 ( k k, [â k,â k ] = = [â k,â k ]. (9 The annihilation operators annihilate the vacuum state of the theory, â k = (1 while the creation operator â k creates a particle of momentum k according to, Of course, the mode functions φ(k,t and φ (k,t obey (c = 1, d 2 dt 2φ(k,t + k2 φ(k,t =, â k = 1 k. (11 d 2 dt 2φ (k,t + k 2 φ (k,t =. The solution that is consistent with relativistic invariance and with the commutation relations (7 and (9 is of the form (can you show it?, φ(k,t = 2k e ıkt, φ (k,t = 2k eıkt. (12 These functions obey a canonical Wronskian, defined by, W[φ,φ ] φ φ φφ = ı, (13 and represent the vacuum solutions for the problem at hand. While φ(k, t corresponds to the positive frequency mode function, φ (k,t is the negative frequency mode function. Note that their amplitude is not independent. Indeed, they are related by complex conjugation. This 2

relation is a consequence of reality of the scalar field, which implies ˆφ (x = ˆφ(x. One can quite easily construct more general (non-vacuum solutions, but we will not go into it here. Let us now show how to evaluate the positive and negative frequency Wightman functions in the vacuum state (in which the mode functions are given by (12. Observe first that â k â k =, â k â k = â k â k =, â k â k = {[â k,â k ] + â k â k } = (2π 3 δ 3 ( k k, (14 where we made use of (9 and (1. We are now ready to evaluate the Wightman functions (5, where the expectation value will be taken with respect to the vacuum state. Inserting the mode decomposition (8, and making use of (14, the Wightman functions become, d ı + (x;x 3 k = k ( x x φ(k,tφ (k,t (2π 3eı ı + (x;x = d 3 k (2π 3e ı k ( x x φ (k,tφ(k,t. (15 The sign of the exponential in the Wigner transform (which is defined as a Fourier transform with respect to the relative coordinate x x in the above expression tells us that + + picks the positive frequency (positive pole contribution, while + picks the negative frequency (negative pole contribution. We shall perform the momentum integration in (15 in spherical coordinates for k : (k,θ,φ. In order to perform the angular integrations in (15, it is convenient to choose x x = x x (,, 1 to point in the ẑ-direction, such that k ( x x = kr cos(θ, where r = x x. The result is, ı + (x;x = ı + (x;x = 2π 2 1 dkk 2sin(kr 1 kr 2k e ık(t t = 1 dk sin(kre ık(t t dk sin(kre ık(t t, (16 where we made use of the vacuum mode functions (12. Both of these integrals contain integrands which are complex oscillatory functions whose amplitude does not decrease as k increases, and hence the integrals are not convergent. A way to evaluate the integrals is to promote t t to a complex number (this procedure is called analytic continuation. It suffices to add a small imaginary part to t t according to ı + (x;x = ı + (x;x = 1 1 dk eıkr e ıkr e ık(t t ıǫ 2ı dk eıkr e ıkr e ık(t t +ıǫ, (17 2ı where ǫ > is an infinitesimal positive real number. The new integrals are convergent. The physical Wightman functions are obtained by analytic continuation after integration, which amounts to sending ǫ. It is, however, customary to keep ǫ in the expressions for the resulting Green functions, in order to serve as a reminder from what analytic continuation they originated. The first integral in (17 yields the following positive frequecy Wightman function, ı + (x;x = 4π 2 1 2rı ( 1 ı[r (t t ıǫ] 1 ı[r + (t t ıǫ] = 1 4π 2 (t t ıǫ 2 r 1, (18 2 4π 2 x 2 + 3

while the second integral yields the following positive frequency Wightman function, ı + (x;x = 4π 2 1 (t t + ıǫ 2 r 2 1 4π 2 where we defined complex distance functions, x 2 +, (19 x 2 + = (t t + ıǫ 2 x x 2, x 2 + = (t t ıǫ 2 x x 2. (2 One can get rid off the ǫ parameters in (18 19 completely if one uses the Dirac identity for distributions, which states that the following two distributions are identical, 1 x + ıǫ = P 1 ıπδ(x. (21 x where P means a principal value, i.e. when 1/x acts on a function of x the integral has to be evaluated such that the pole at x = is approached uniformly (equally fast from negative and positive x s. Eqs. (18 19 can be brought into the form (21 by noting that x 2 ± = x 2 ±sign(t t ıǫ, where x 2 = (t t 2 x x 2 and sign(t t = θ(t t θ(t t. Thus we have, ı + (x;x = P 1 +ı 4π 2 x2 4π δ( x2, ı + (x;x = P 1 ı 4π 2 x2 4π δ( x2, (22 which indeed contain no more dependence on ǫ. When (18 19 are inserted into the definition of the Feynman propagator (4 one immediately obtains the Feynman propagator for a real massless scalar field, ı F (x;x = 4π 2 1 ( t t ıǫ 2 r 2 1 4π 2 x 2 ++ Analogously, one can define the anti-time order (or anti-feynman propagator as,. (23 F(x;x (x;x = θ(t t (x;x + θ(t t + (x;x. (24 Above considerations immediately tell us that, for a massless real scalar field, F evaluates to, ı F(x;x = 1 4π 2 ( t t + ıǫ 2 r 1. (25 2 4π 2 where we introduced a notation, x 2 x 2 ++ = ( t t ıǫ 2 x x 2, x 2 = ( t t + ıǫ 2 x x 2. (26 One more important remark follows. From the definition of the Feynman propagator (4 5, the canonical commutator (7 and the Klein-Gordon equation (6 one can quite easily show that the Feynman propagator obeys the following equations, where 2 = η µν ( / x µ ( / x ν. 2 ı F (x;x = 2 ı F (x;x = ıδ 4 (x x, (27 4

3. Contour integration Now, these expressions for the vacuum Green functions of a massless real scalar field can be also obtained without referring to mode functions, but instead working from the momentum space propagator, and performing appropriate contour integrations. Including only the pole contributions results in vacuum propagators of free theory (not including interactions. We shall now show how it works in some detail. The propagator equation (27 together with translational symmetry of the vacuum imply that the Feynman propagator F (x;x = F (x x is a function of coordinate difference only. This allows one to perform a Wigner transform, defined by, F (x x = d 4 k (2π 4e ık (x x F (k µ, F (k µ = d 4 k (2π 4e+ık (x x F (x x, (28 where k (x x = η µν k µ (x ν x ν. The propagator equation (27 in Wigner space becomes simple, k µ k µ F (k α =, and it is solved by G F (k µ = = ( 1 k µ k µ 2k k k 1, (29 k + k where k k, such that in direct (physical space the propagator becomes, F (x x =? d 3 k k ( x x dk (2π 3eı 2π e ık (t t 1 ( 1 2k k k 1. (3 k + k The k integral is not well defined, unless one gives a prescription for how to evaluate it around the poles on the real axis at k = k (the positive frequency pole and k = k (the negative frequency pole. An inspection (basically trial and error! shows that the pole prescription corresponding to the Feynman propagator is the one depicted on figure 1a. From Figure 1b we see that the integral does not change if one shifts the poles by an infinitezimal amount ±ıǫ (ǫ > is an infinitezimal parameter, F (x x = d 3 k k ( x x (2π 3eı dk 2π e ık (t t 1 ( 2k 1 k k + ıǫ 1 k + k ıǫ. (31 This is now a well defined expression. We shall now show how to perform the k integral by contour integration. Since the Feynman propagator is defined for all times (both for t in the past of t as well as for t in the future of t, it is convenient to evaluate the integral separately when t t > (this part is proportional to θ(t t, and when t t < (this part is proportional to θ(t t. The appropriate contours are shown in Figure 1c. The contours are chosen such that the semi-circular parts of the contours or radius R do not contribute in the limit when R (for a finite R the semi-circular contours give answers that are exponentially suppressed as e R. Next, we use the Cauchy integral theorem (see e.g. chapters 6-7 of George Arfken, Mathematical Methods for Physicists to evaluate the k integrals. According to the Cauchy theorem, the k integral along the real axis from k = to k = + equals to the closed contour integral (if the semi-circular contour does not contribute. The two relevant contours are shown in figure 3c. The left contour gives a contribution equals to (2πı (since the sense of integration is positive times the residue of the integrand at the pole k = k + ıǫ, while the right contour on Figure 3c gives ( 2πı (since 5

the sense of integration is negative times the residue of the integrand at the pole k = k ıǫ. The result is, F (x x = ( d 3 k k ( x x θ(t t 2πı ( 1eık(t t (2π 3eı 2π 2k + θ(t t 2πı 2π e ık(t t 2k. (32 When this is rewritten as, ı F (x x = d 3 k k ( x x (θ(t t eık(t t + θ(t t e ık(t t, (33 (2π 3eı 2k 2k a comparison with Eqs. (4 and (15 16 reveals that the expressions multiplying θ(t t and θ(t t in (33 are precisely the negative and positive frequency Wightman functions ı + and ı +, respectively. In figure 1d the two contours from figure 1c have been deformed without crossing any poles. This means that the contour integration around the poles as shown in figure 1d gives the same answer as the ones in figure 1c. The contours in figure 1d represent the integration contours you should use in your homework 8 when constructing the Wightman functions. The remaining k integrals in (33 are performed exactly the same way as it is done in Eqs. (16 23, resulting in the Feynman propagator (23. In these notes we have shown how to evaluate the vacuum contribution to the free Feynman propagator for a massless real scalar field. The Feynman propagator in more complicated situtations such as thermal equilibrium has, in addition to the vacuum contribution originating from the quasiparticle poles k = ±k we calculated in these notes, other contributions which satisfy a homogeneous wave equation (and have possibly additional poles at complex k. The propagator for a massive scalar field has an additional term in the Lagrangian density L = m 2 φ 2 /2. This term changes the k poles to k ±ω = ± k 2 + m 2, which is the Einstein dispersion relation for massive particles. The procedure of constructing the massive Feynman propagator is in principle the same as outlined in these notes, except that now the poles are shifted, which will change the integrals. In particular, the k integrals will be now more complicated. The quantum mechanical Green functions can be immediately obtained from the field theoretic result, when one realises that the Feynman propagator for a quantum particle in a harmonic potential can be thought of as just one harmonic oscillator with a frequency ω k. Hence, the quantum mechanical Green functions can be read off from our intermediate results (before the k integrals are performed. 6