Stochastic modeling of Extinction coefficients for solar power applications

Similar documents
Sunlight and its Properties II. EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz

Time Series Model of Photovoltaic Generation for Distribution Planning Analysis. Jorge Valenzuela

Chapter 2 Available Solar Radiation

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Solar Radiation

Calculating equation coefficients

Chapter 1 Solar Radiation

Introduction to Photovoltaics

Simulation of Autonomous Electrical Power Systems

Chapter Seven. Solar Energy

Motion of the Sun. View Comments

Page 1. Name:

Questions you should be able to answer after reading the material

ME 476 Solar Energy UNIT THREE SOLAR RADIATION

Integrating the Solar Spectrum

ME 430 Fundamentals of Solar Energy Conversion for heating and Cooling Applications

Table 1-2. TMY3 data header (line 2) 1-68 Data field name and units (abbreviation or mnemonic)

CLASSICS. Handbook of Solar Radiation Data for India

Lecture 4: Radiation Transfer

Production of electricity using photovoltaic panels and effects of cloudiness

1. SOLAR GEOMETRY, EXTRATERRESTRIAL IRRADIANCE & INCIDENCE ANGLES

Solar Radiation Measurements and Model Calculations at Inclined Surfaces

MODELLING OF CLOUDLESS SOLAR RADIATION FOR PV MODULE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Basic information about developed Calculator for solar / wind hybrid power supply

PV Panel Positioning using a Robot Manipulator

Radiation in the atmosphere

Observer-Sun Angles. ), Solar altitude angle (α s. ) and solar azimuth angle (γ s )). θ z. = 90 o α s

Development and testing of a new day-ahead solar power forecasting system

Analysis Methods in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Lecture 2: Global Energy Cycle

Optimizing the Photovoltaic Solar Energy Capture on Sunny and Cloudy Days Using a Solar Tracking System

Chapter 7. Solar Cell

COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE ANGLES DESCRIBING THE SUN S APPARENT MOVEMENT IN THE SKY

CONSTRUCTION AND CALIBRATION OF A LOCAL PYRANOMETER AND ITS USE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY OF SOLAR RADIATION

Organic Electronic Devices

Analysis of Scattering of Radiation in a Plane-Parallel Atmosphere. Stephanie M. Carney ES 299r May 23, 2007

Impedance/Reactance Problems

Multiple scattering of light by water cloud droplets with external and internal mixing of black carbon aerosols

ATM 507 Lecture 4. Text reading Chapters 3 and 4 Today s topics Chemistry, Radiation and Photochemistry review. Problem Set 1: due Sept.

MAPH & & & & & & 02 LECTURE

FLATE Hillsborough Community College - Brandon (813)

Basic human requirements

Photovoltaic Systems Solar Radiation

Solar radiation / radiative transfer

EGEE 437: HWK #2. Brownson. Yaqdaan Alkayyoomi, Mackenzie Ailes, Nicholas Minutillo, Sheel Vora. Group 17. Due on Thursday, Feb.

Lecture 26. Regional radiative effects due to anthropogenic aerosols. Part 2. Haze and visibility.

Spectrum of Radiation. Importance of Radiation Transfer. Radiation Intensity and Wavelength. Lecture 3: Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Climate

HEATING THE ATMOSPHERE

Section 2: The Science of Solar Energy

Physical Basics of Remote-Sensing with Satellites

Lecture 3: Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Climate

EE Properties of Sunlight. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering

Evaluation of ultraviolet radiation protection of a membrane structure using a UV Shade Chart

Chapter 2. Heating Earth's Surface & Atmosphere

The Sun. Fabio Peron Università IUAV - Venezia. Earth-Sun relationships. The Sun. Photosphere (Emits much of the solar radiant power)

Principles of Energy Conversion Part 11A. Solar Energy Insolation

Energy Balance and Temperature. Ch. 3: Energy Balance. Ch. 3: Temperature. Controls of Temperature

Energy Balance and Temperature

Determination of Cloud Effect on the Performance of Photovoltaic Module

NABCEP Entry Level Exam Review Solfest practice test by Sean White

Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation and its Parameterization

Regularities of Angular Distribution of Near-Horizon Sky Brightness in the Cloudless Atmosphere

Lecture 3: Global Energy Cycle

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing - Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

C2: NĂNG LƯỢNG ĐIỆN MẶT TRỜI

Purdue University Meteorological Tool (PUMET)

Temperature AOSC 200 Tim Canty

Energy and the Earth AOSC 200 Tim Canty

Interaction between building services and environment.

1 A 3 C 2 B 4 D. 5. During which month does the minimum duration of insolation occur in New York State? 1 February 3 September 2 July 4 December

Recommendations from COST 713 UVB Forecasting

Remote Sensing Systems Overview

Simplified Collector Performance Model

Stanford University MatSci 152: Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices Spring Quarter, Final Exam, June 8, 2010

Solar Radiation in Thailand:

Project 3 Convection and Atmospheric Thermodynamics

Photovoltaic Systems Engineering

Introduction. Katarzyna Skorupska. Silicon will be used as the model material however presented knowledge applies to other semiconducting materials

Exercise 6. Solar Panel Orientation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. Introduction to the importance of solar panel orientation DISCUSSION

Energy. Kinetic and Potential Energy. Kinetic Energy. Kinetic energy the energy of motion

Atmospheric Radiation

THE SOLAR RESOURCE: PART I MINES ParisTech Center Observation, Impacts, Energy (Tel.: +33 (0) )

Understanding the Greenhouse Effect

A B C D PROBLEMS Dilution of power plant plumes. z z z z

1. The frequency of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to its wavelength. a. directly *b. inversely

Solar Insolation and Earth Radiation Budget Measurements

Solar Analysis. ST =CT + 4min 1 o (LTM LL)+E+1 (1) E=9.87 sin 2 B 7.53 cosb 1.5 sinb (2)

Lecture # 04 January 27, 2010, Wednesday Energy & Radiation

Heat Transfer F11-ENG Lab #5 Photovoltaic Solar Cell School of Engineering, UC Merced.

IMPROVED MODEL FOR FORECASTING GLOBAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE DURING SUNNY AND CLOUDY DAYS. Bogdan-Gabriel Burduhos, Mircea Neagoe *

Simulated Radiances for OMI

ON-LINE SOLAR RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM, IN CLUJ NAPOCA, ROMANIA

Lecture Notes Prepared by Mike Foster Spring 2007

Insolation and Temperature variation. The Sun & Insolation. The Sun (cont.) The Sun

The inputs and outputs of energy within the earth-atmosphere system that determines the net energy available for surface processes is the Energy

Current and Resistance. February 12, 2014 Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2, Chapter 25 1

Global Energy Balance. GEOG/ENST 2331: Lecture 4 Ahrens: Chapter 2

4. Solar radiation on tilted surfaces

ESTIMATION OF AUTOMOBILE COOLING LOADS FOR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM DESIGN

Which graph best shows the relationship between intensity of insolation and position on the Earth's surface? A) B) C) D)

Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Optimization Using Extremum Seeking

Transcription:

1(77) Stochastic modeling of Extinction coefficients for solar power applications Ingemar Mathiasson January 2007 Department for Energy and Environment Division of Electric Power Engineering Chalmers University of Technology

2(77) Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 MODELING OF THE EXTINCTION COEFFICIENT... 7 3 MEASUREMENTS... 7 4 MEASUREMENT RESULTS... 11 5 ANALYSIS OF THE MEASUREMENTS... 49 5.1 COMMON... 49 5.2 THE EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS... 50 5.2.1 Probability function of the extinction coefficients... 52 6 REFERENCES... 77

3(77) 1 INTRODUCTION This document deals with the problem to realize a useful stochastic model of how the extinction coefficients, regarding the wave length region corresponding to the working area for silicon photovoltaic solarcells, will vary as a consequence of how different meteorological parameters undergo variations. As the weather situation is depending on stochastic variations, then also the extinction coefficients will vary stochastically. The extinction in question is defined according to: Equation 1: exp Equation 2: S S 0 Equation 3: Ext M M h h 0 Equation 4: S M S cos Sdiff Where : the atmospheric transmission (0 1) Ext: M : the extinction coefficient (in the wave length region of silicon photovoltaic solarcells) the relative atmospheric depth (i.e. the distance to pass through the atmosphere by the Sun radiation). It is related to the depth when the Sun is in zenith h: the atmospheric depth h 0 : the atmospheric depth with 2 : the Sun s altitude above the horizon S: irradiance (W/m 2 ) after the radiation (in the wave length region of silicon photovoltaic solarcells) has passed the atmosphere in question

4(77) S 0 : irradiance (W/m 2 ) before the radiation (in the wave length region of silicon photovoltaic solarcells) has passed the atmosphere in question Sdiff: diffuse irradiance component against as a measuring surface (solar panel). The diffuse component is a result of atmospheric scattering and reflections against surrounding objects S M : effective irradiance (W/m 2 ) against a measuring surface (solar panel) : the angle between the surface normal of the measuring surface (solar panel) and the direction to Sun Cos could be calculated by the following expression: Equation 5: cos sin cos Where Z cos sin Z cos( S ) Ω Z : Ω S : θ : the normal angle of the measuring surface relative to zenith the normal angle of the measuring surface relative to south the Sun s azimuth (the Sun s altitude above the horizon) and θ are calculated according to [ 1 ]. See Figure 1 for some illustration of the above parameters.

5(77) Figure 1 The radiation is reduced as an effect of the atmospheric influence From Figure 1 it could be established the following relation between M and :: Equation 6: M 1 sin From Equation 1 it could be observed that the transmission will decrease if the extinction is increasing. If the transmission is 1 ( Ext M 0) then there is no atmospheric reduction of the incoming Sun irradiance. The extinction is dependent of the meteorological conditions regarding: Temperature Air pressure Huminiy Rain

6(77) Snow Visibility Cloudness In addition to that there is an influence on the extinction coefficient as an effect of parameters not meteorological depended: Varying conditions regarding aerosols in the air Varying conditions regarding the composition of different molecules in the air All together there are a lot of parameters that have influences on the extinction in question. The model that is suggested in this document, presumes so called typical cases, for instance: Ordinary summer in Sweden (a mixture of different meteorological conditions) Cloudy day with a clodiness of ¼ Sunny day And so on Each such typical cases will be assigned model parameters (stochastic parameters) that serve as inputs to the model. Outputs from the model are extinction coefficients that in a statistic point of view are representative for the typical cases in question. See Figure 2 that shows the principle of the model that is suggested. The reason to use typical cases is to get a model process that is practical to handle.

7(77) Figure 2 The principle of the stochastic model for generation of extinction coefficients 2 MODELING OF THE EXTINCTION COEFFICIENT The principle for the model is described in [ 1 ] (chapter Extinction_make ). 3 MEASUREMENTS Measurements to get statistic foundations to make a survey of the extinction coefficient have been performed during the period 21/6-7/9 2006. The principle for the measurement arrangement follows by Figure 3. There are 3 solar cell panels connected in series by the connection box. Each solar cell panel consists of 72 series connected solar cells. The result of this arrangement is that there are 216 series connected cells at the output of the connection box. The current I S in Figure 3 corresponds to the short circuit current of the solar cells. As there are so many solar cells that co-operates, two advantages are at hand: Small effects regarding the voltage drops in the connection wires A good representative value (mean value of a large number cells) regarding the short circuit current in question

8(77) Figure 3 The principle for the measurement arrangement. The connection box connects the three solar cells panels in series. This results in 216 series connected solar cells Figure 4 The equivalent circuit of a solar cell

9(77) The short circuit current is a good measure of the Sun irradiance. See Figure 4 that shows the equivalent circuit of the solar cell. As the resistance R S in Figure 4 is quit small (about 15 m ) the maximum voltage drop over this resistance (i.e. at short circuit) normally is less than 60 mv. This voltage corresponds to the voltage U S. A short circuited cell output (i.e. U L = 0) will result in U S = U diod. If U diod is in the region of maximum 60 mv, then the diod current I diod, is very small (in the order of a few ma) compared with the short circuit current (normally in the order of amperes). This results in: Equation 7: I SC = I L at short circuited cell output. I.e. I SC = I S (see Figure 4 and Figure 3). I SC = G S M, Where G: a scale factor (Am 2 /W) S M : Effective Sun irradiance (W/m 2 ) or Equation 8: I S = G S M According to Equation 1, Equation 2 and Equation 4: exp S S 0 And Ext M S M S cos Sdiff This gives: Equation 9: I S G S 0 exp Ext M cos G Sdiff I exp Ext M cos Idiff M

10(77) Where I M : A reference current (A), that corresponds to the short circuit current for a Sun irradiance of S 0. Idiff: A current component (A), that corresponds to the contribution from diffuse irradiance I S : Short circuited current (A) Equation 9 gives the extinction coefficient. Equation 10: Ext I S Idiff ln I M cos M If Ext, Idiff and I M are known then it is possible to calculate a value for I S for a given geographic position (latitude and longitude), a given normal angle of the measuring surface relative to zenith and south and a given time point (date and hour) according to: Equation 11: I S exp( Ext M) I M cos Idiff

11(77) 4 MEASUREMENT RESULTS Figure 5 to Figure 76 give the short circuit current from measurements during the period 21/6-7/9 2006. The main reason for the measurement campaign was to collect information about the short circuit current. To get some idea about the voltage variations, some days however, were used for no load voltage measuring. This result follows in Figure 77 to Figure 80. Figure 5 Short circuit current 060621

12(77) Figure 6 Short circuit current 060622 Figure 7 Short circuit current 060623

13(77) Figure 8 Short circuit current 060624 Figure 9 Short circuit current 060625

14(77) Figure 10 Short circuit current 060626 Figure 11 Short circuit current 060627

15(77) Figure 12 Short circuit current 060628 Figure 13 Short circuit current 060629

16(77) Figure 14 Short circuit current 060630 Figure 15 Short circuit current 060701

17(77) Figure 16 Short circuit current 060702 Figure 17 Short circuit current 060703

18(77) Figure 18 Short circuit current 060704 Figure 19 Short circuit current 060705

19(77) Figure 20 Short circuit current 060706 Figure 21 Short circuit current 060707

20(77) Figure 22 Short circuit current 060708 Figure 23 Short circuit current 060709

21(77) Figure 24 Short circuit current 060710 Figure 25 Short circuit current 060718

22(77) Figure 26 Short circuit current 060719 Figure 27 Short circuit current 060720

23(77) Figure 28 Short circuit current 060721 Figure 29 Short circuit current 060722

24(77) Figure 30 Short circuit current 060723 Figure 31 Short circuit current 060724

25(77) Figure 32 Short circuit current 060725 Figure 33 Short circuit current 060726

26(77) Figure 34 Short circuit current 060727 Figure 35 Short circuit current 060728

27(77) Figure 36 Short circuit current 060729 Figure 37 Short circuit current 060730

28(77) Figure 38 Short circuit current 060731 Figure 39 Short circuit current 060801

29(77) Figure 40 Short circuit current 060802 Figure 41 Short circuit current 060803

30(77) Figure 42 Short circuit current 060804 Figure 43 Short circuit current 060805

31(77) Figure 44 Short circuit current 060806 Figure 45 Short circuit current 060807

32(77) Figure 46 Short circuit current 060808 Figure 47 Short circuit current 060809

33(77) Figure 48 Short circuit current 060810 Figure 49 Short circuit current 060811

34(77) Figure 50 Short circuit current 060812 Figure 51 Short circuit current 060813

35(77) Figure 52 Short circuit current 060814 Figure 53 Short circuit current 060815

36(77) Figure 54 Short circuit current 060816 Figure 55 Short circuit current 060817

37(77) Figure 56 Short circuit current 060818 Figure 57 Short circuit current 060819

38(77) Figure 58 Short circuit current 060820 Figure 59 Short circuit current 060821

39(77) Figure 60 Short circuit current 060822 Figure 61 Short circuit current 060823

40(77) Figure 62 Short circuit current 060824 Figure 63 Short circuit current 060825

41(77) Figure 64 Short circuit current 060826 Figure 65 Short circuit current 060827

42(77) Figure 66 Short circuit current 060828 Figure 67 Short circuit current 060829

43(77) Figure 68 Short circuit current 060830 Figure 69 Short circuit current 060831

44(77) Figure 70 Short circuit current 060901 Figure 71 Short circuit current 060902

45(77) Figure 72 Short circuit current 060903 Figure 73 Short circuit current 060904

46(77) Figure 74 Short circuit current 060905 Figure 75 Short circuit current 060906

47(77) Figure 76 Short circuit current 060907 Figure 77 No load voltage 060714

48(77) Figure 78 No load voltage 060715 Figure 79 No load voltage 060716

49(77) Figure 80 No load voltage 060717 5 ANALYSIS OF THE MEASUREMENTS 5.1 Common The measurements consists of collected data in intervals of 1 minute during the period from 21/6 to 7/9 2006. Figure 81 illustrates the extinction coefficient profile, based on the mesurements, during the period in question. 71 days in this period were used for short circuit measurements, giving basic data for extinction calculations. 4 days were used for no load measurements giving information about the top voltage profile. 4 days were not used for regular measurements. In Figure 81 it could be noted that the envelope (the top values) of the extinction coefficient describes a falling curve, i.e. the maximum extinction is reduced during the time period in question.

50(77) Note. Days with extinction coefficient = 0 in Figure 81 represent no load measurements alternatively no regular measurements. Figure 83 to Figure 112 illustrate some calculated values together with corresponding measured results from the 30 first measurement days. The solid curves ( ) correspond to measured short circuit currents. The dashed (--) and dached-dotted (_.) curves are calculated values. These calculations are based on Equation 11, where the dashed (--) curves corresponds to an extinction coefficient of 0.3126 and the dached-dotted (_.) curves corresponds to the mean values of extinction coefficients between 9 am to 15 pm for the day in question. The value 0.3126 for the extinction coefficient corresponds to a value that for M = 1 and S 0 = 1367 W/m 2 gives S = 1000 W/m 2. See Equation 1, Equation 2 and Equation 3. 5.2 The extinction coefficients The extinction coefficient is defined according to Equation 1. This is more and less a good approximation of the so called Beers law, that gives the transmission for the electromagnetic radiation in a very narrow wave length region in combination with a homogeneous transmission media. This is not on hand in the present application. So it must be pointed out that there is an approximation to use one single extinction coefficient to describe the transmission circumstances in this case. However the estimation is that the present approximation will result in a tool with a precision good enougt for statistic prediction of the potential to get electric power when using solar cells at different geographic locations and times of the year. Future validations will give more answeres about these questions. The calculations of the extinction coefficients are based on Equation 10. The following parameters have then been used: Idiff: I M : cos : The parameter corresponds to the resulted current component from the diffuse irradiance. The measured short circuited current at time point 16.30 has been used as value. The chosed time point will ensure that there is only diffuse radiation that hit the solar cells The parameter corresponds to the short circuit current for a Sun irradiance of S 0 (Sun irradiance outside the atmosphere) and cos = 1. This value has been predicted to 5 A The parameter corresponds to cosinus of the angle between the surface normal of the measuring surface (solar panel) and the direction to Sun. It is calculated as a result of the Sun altitude and azimuth and on the normal angle of the measuring surface relative to zenith and south. The Sun altitude and azimuth are calculated according to the description in [ 1 ]. The normal angle of the measuring surface relative to zenith is 90. The normal angle of the measuring surface relative to south is - 30. The equation to calculate cos follows by Equation 5

51(77) M: The parameter corresponds to the relative atmospheric depth. It is calculated according to Equation 6 and the description in [ 1 ] The mean values and standard deviations of the extinction coefficients between 9 am to 15 pm (Swedish summer time) for the first 30 short circuit measurement days are given in Table 1. Measuring day (number) Date Cloudiness (mean value) Mean value of extinction coefficient 9 am to 15 pm 1 2006-06-21 5 6/8 1.82 1.12 2-22 5 6/8 1.58 1.18 3-23 5 6/8 2.03 1.09 4-24 3 4/8 0.94 0.70 5-25 5 6/8 1.98 0.62 6-26 5 6/8 2.08 0.50 7-27 7 8/8 2.42 0.49 8-28 5 6/8 1.96 1.56 9-29 1 2/8 0.65 0.56 10-30 3 4/8 0.99 0.79 11-07-01 0 1/8 0.44 0.04 12-07-02 0 1/8 0.46 0.17 13-07-03 0 1/8 0.46 0.05 14-07-04 0 1/8 0.48 0.05 15-07-05 0 1/8 0.50 0.04 16-07-06 0 1/8 0.48 0.02 Standard deviation of extinction coefficient 9 am to 15 pm

52(77) 17-07-07 7 8/8 2.27 1.54 18-07-08 5 6/8 1.96 1.15 19-07-09 5 6/8 1.72 1.00 20-07-10 5 6/8 1.84 1.06 28-07-18 0 1/8 0.42 0.01 29-07-19 0 1/8 0.42 0.01 30-07-20 0 1/8 0.41 0.12 31-07-21 7 8/8 3.85 0.75 32-07-22 7 8/8 2.42 1.42 33-07-23 5 6/8 1.60 1.10 34-07-24 5 6/8 1.99 1.22 35-07-25 5 6/8 1.49 0.96 36-07-26 0 1/8 0.44 0.02 37-07-27 0 1/8 0.53 0.08 Mean value of mean values: 1.35 0.65 Table 1 Mean values and standard deviations of extinction koefficients during 9 am to 15 pm for the first 30 measuring days of short circuited current 5.2.1 Probability function of the extinction coefficients The following analysis presumes that the extinction coefficients are distributed according a so called lognormal distribution function. That implies that the natural logarithm of the extinction coefficients are normal distributed. The mean values (μ) and standard deviations (σ) of the natural logarithm of the extinction coefficients between 9 am to 15 pm (Swedish summer time) for the first 30 short circuit measurement days are given in Table 2.

53(77) The total mean value of the statistical parameters (μ and σ) in Table 2 is μtot = -0.8863 and σtot = 0.9652 Presuming these values gives the lognormal density function according to Figure 82. Measuring day (number) Date Cloudiness (mean value) Mean value of nat log for extinction coefficient 9 am to 15 pm μ Standard deviation of nat log for extinction coefficient 9 am to 15 pm σ 1 2006-06-21 5 6/8 0.0602 1.0661 2-22 5 6/8-0.5869 1.6811 3-23 5 6/8-0.1390 2.2193 4-24 3 4/8-1.0329 1.4186 5-25 5 6/8 0.4247 0.4587 6-26 5 6/8 0.5209 0.3211 7-27 7 8/8 0.7211 0.2264 8-28 5 6/8-0.8158 2.5341 9-29 1 2/8-2.0478 1.4178 10-30 3 4/8-1.8986 2.8009 11-07-01 0 1/8-2.0920 0.2162 12-07-02 0 1/8-2.0284 0.3451 13-07-03 0 1/8-1.9814 0.2419 14-07-04 0 1/8-1.8449 0.2668 15-07-05 0 1/8-1.6916 0.2056 16-07-06 0 1/8-1.7998 0.1313

54(77) 17-07-07 7 8/8 0.1217 1.2163 18-07-08 5 6/8 0.0141 1.3137 19-07-09 5 6/8 0.0854 0.7732 20-07-10 5 6/8-0.1951 1.7054 28-07-18 0 1/8-2.2442 0.0905 29-07-19 0 1/8-2.2309 0.0792 30-07-20 0 1/8-2.5169 0.8713 31-07-21 7 8/8 1.2291 0.2951 32-07-22 7 8/8 0.2460 1.3772 33-07-23 5 6/8-0.3687 1.5807 34-07-24 5 6/8-0.1083 1.5530 35-07-25 5 6/8-0.7527 2.1293 36-07-26 0 1/8-2.0537 0.1183 37-07-27 0 1/8-1.5838 0.3016 Mean value of mean values: -0.8863 0.9652 Table 2 Mean values and standard deviations of the natural logarithm for extinction coefficients during 9 am to 15 pm for the first 30 measuring days of short circuited current

55(77) Figure 81 Profile of the extinction coefficient, based on the mesurements, during the period from 21/6 to 7/9 2006. Figure 82 The extinction coefficient density function with μtot = -0.8863 and σtot = 0.9652

56(77) Figure 83 to Figure 112 illustrate some calculated short circuit currents together with corresponding measured results from the 30 first measurement days. The solid curves ( ) correspond to measured values. The dashed (--) and dached-dotted (_.) curves are calculated values with different extinction koefficients. The calculations are based on Equation 11. The dashed (--) curves are based on the extinction coefficient = 0.3126. This value has been assumed as the under limit of a realistic extinction coefficient. The value is based on calculations according to Equation 1, Equation 2 and Equation 3, with the following parameters: M: 1 (corresponding to the Sun in zenith) S: 1000 W/m 2 S 0 : 1367 W/m 2 The dached-dotted (_.) curves are based on the extinction coefficients according to the mean value of extinction coefficient between 9 am to 15 pm for the measurement day in question. See Table 1. Figure 83 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060621 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.8242

57(77) Figure 84 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060622 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.5760 Figure 85 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060623 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 2.0317

58(77) Figure 86 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060624 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.9449 Figure 87 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060625 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.9826

59(77) Figure 88 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060626 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 2.0771 Figure 89 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060627 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 2.4233

60(77) Figure 90 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060628 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.9638 Figure 91 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060629 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.6486

61(77) Figure 92 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060630 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.9933 Figure 93 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060701 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4393

62(77) Figure 94 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060702 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4615 Figure 95 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060703 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4553

63(77) Figure 96 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060704 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4769 Figure 97 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060705 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.5008

64(77) Figure 98 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060706 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4792 Figure 99 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060707 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 2.2706

65(77) Figure 100 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060708 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.9575 Figure 101 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060709 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.7162

66(77) Figure 102 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060710 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.8421 Figure 103 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060718 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4189

67(77) Figure 104 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060719 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4203 Figure 105 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060720 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4144

68(77) Figure 106 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060721 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 3.8493 Figure 107 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060722 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 2.4203

69(77) Figure 108 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060723 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.6010 Figure 109 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060724 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.9856

70(77) Figure 110 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060725 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 1.4888 Figure 111 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060726 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.4417

71(77) Figure 112 Measured and calculated short circuit current 060727 : measured, : 0.3126, _. _: 0.5288 Figure 113 to Figure 121 give the relation between the extinction coefficient and the corresponding short circuit current for some measurement days. As can be observed is for example that a relative high extinction coeffient (low atmospheric transmission) results in a low short circuit current. A low extinction coefficient (high atmospheric transmission) results in a high short circuit current.

72(77) Figure 113 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060705 Figure 114 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060706

73(77) Figure 115 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060719 Figure 116 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060622

74(77) Figure 117 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060623 Figure 118 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060624

75(77) Figure 119 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060626 Figure 120 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060627

76(77) Figure 121 Extinction coefficient and short circuited current vs Time. 060721

77(77) 6 REFERENCES [ 1 ] Analysis ofcombined Power Systems.General description of software Chalmers University of Technology, 2006, Ingemar Mathiasson