A Short Introduction to Self-similar Groups

Similar documents
Lecture 2: Cayley Graphs

Counting Paths Between Vertices. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs

CS 491G Combinatorial Optimization Lecture Notes

Solutions for HW9. Bipartite: put the red vertices in V 1 and the black in V 2. Not bipartite!

1 PYTHAGORAS THEOREM 1. Given a right angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

Lecture 6: Coding theory

Lecture 8: Abstract Algebra

NON-DETERMINISTIC FSA

2.4 Theoretical Foundations

CIT 596 Theory of Computation 1. Graphs and Digraphs

Factorising FACTORISING.

Project 6: Minigoals Towards Simplifying and Rewriting Expressions

Compression of Palindromes and Regularity.

The University of Nottingham SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE A LEVEL 2 MODULE, SPRING SEMESTER MACHINES AND THEIR LANGUAGES ANSWERS

18.06 Problem Set 4 Due Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. in 2-106

Finite State Automata and Determinisation

Numbers and indices. 1.1 Fractions. GCSE C Example 1. Handy hint. Key point

Technische Universität München Winter term 2009/10 I7 Prof. J. Esparza / J. Křetínský / M. Luttenberger 11. Februar Solution

CS103B Handout 18 Winter 2007 February 28, 2007 Finite Automata

GRUPOS NANTEL BERGERON

1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata

Surds and Indices. Surds and Indices. Curriculum Ready ACMNA: 233,

Necessary and sucient conditions for some two. Abstract. Further we show that the necessary conditions for the existence of an OD(44 s 1 s 2 )

CS 2204 DIGITAL LOGIC & STATE MACHINE DESIGN SPRING 2014

CARLETON UNIVERSITY. 1.0 Problems and Most Solutions, Sect B, 2005

Automata and Regular Languages

22: Union Find. CS 473u - Algorithms - Spring April 14, We want to maintain a collection of sets, under the operations of:

Section 2.1 Special Right Triangles

CSE 332. Sorting. Data Abstractions. CSE 332: Data Abstractions. QuickSort Cutoff 1. Where We Are 2. Bounding The MAXIMUM Problem 4

Convert the NFA into DFA

CS311 Computational Structures Regular Languages and Regular Grammars. Lecture 6

6.5 Improper integrals

Mid-Term Examination - Spring 2014 Mathematical Programming with Applications to Economics Total Score: 45; Time: 3 hours

Minimal DFA. minimal DFA for L starting from any other

Logic, Set Theory and Computability [M. Coppenbarger]

Section 1.3 Triangles

Graph Theory. Simple Graph G = (V, E). V={a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,k} E={(a,b),(a,g),( a,h),(a,k),(b,c),(b,k),...,(h,k)}

I 3 2 = I I 4 = 2A

Lecture 11 Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs)

Now we must transform the original model so we can use the new parameters. = S max. Recruits

CS 360 Exam 2 Fall 2014 Name

CS 573 Automata Theory and Formal Languages

Algebra 2 Semester 1 Practice Final

#A42 INTEGERS 11 (2011) ON THE CONDITIONED BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS

where the box contains a finite number of gates from the given collection. Examples of gates that are commonly used are the following: a b

Homework 3 Solutions

GM1 Consolidation Worksheet

CM10196 Topic 4: Functions and Relations

Chapter 4 State-Space Planning

Intermediate Math Circles Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Finite Automata II. Nickolas Rollick a b b. a b 4

Parse trees, ambiguity, and Chomsky normal form

Coalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata

Regular expressions, Finite Automata, transition graphs are all the same!!

Designing finite automata II

On the Spectra of Bipartite Directed Subgraphs of K 4

Improper Integrals. The First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, as we ve discussed in class, goes as follows:

Algorithms & Data Structures Homework 8 HS 18 Exercise Class (Room & TA): Submitted by: Peer Feedback by: Points:

Pre-Lie algebras, rooted trees and related algebraic structures

Nondeterminism and Nodeterministic Automata

Total score: /100 points

CS261: A Second Course in Algorithms Lecture #5: Minimum-Cost Bipartite Matching

Data Structures LECTURE 10. Huffman coding. Example. Coding: problem definition

Free groups, Lecture 2, part 1

POSITIVE IMPLICATIVE AND ASSOCIATIVE FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS

Discrete Structures, Test 2 Monday, March 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α

Welcome. Balanced search trees. Balanced Search Trees. Inge Li Gørtz

MCH T 111 Handout Triangle Review Page 1 of 3

CS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory

Section 2.3. Matrix Inverses

PYTHAGORAS THEOREM WHAT S IN CHAPTER 1? IN THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL:

CS 310 (sec 20) - Winter Final Exam (solutions) SOLUTIONS

CHENG Chun Chor Litwin The Hong Kong Institute of Education

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

Aperiodic tilings and substitutions

PAIR OF LINEAR EQUATIONS IN TWO VARIABLES

First Midterm Examination

QUADRATIC EQUATION. Contents

Nondeterministic Finite Automata

Nondeterministic Automata vs Deterministic Automata

Spacetime and the Quantum World Questions Fall 2010

5.3 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Formal Languages and Automata

for all x in [a,b], then the area of the region bounded by the graphs of f and g and the vertical lines x = a and x = b is b [ ( ) ( )] A= f x g x dx

Lecture 3: Equivalence Relations

20 MATHEMATICS POLYNOMIALS

Assignment 1 Automata, Languages, and Computability. 1 Finite State Automata and Regular Languages

CSCI 340: Computational Models. Kleene s Theorem. Department of Computer Science

EXTENSION OF THE GCD STAR OF DAVID THEOREM TO MORE THAN TWO GCDS CALVIN LONG AND EDWARD KORNTVED

Trigonometry Revision Sheet Q5 of Paper 2

Bisimulation, Games & Hennessy Milner logic

The Word Problem in Quandles

SEMI-EXCIRCLE OF QUADRILATERAL

= state, a = reading and q j

Finite-State Automata: Recap

Implication Graphs and Logic Testing

5. (±±) Λ = fw j w is string of even lengthg [ 00 = f11,00g 7. (11 [ 00)± Λ = fw j w egins with either 11 or 00g 8. (0 [ ffl)1 Λ = 01 Λ [ 1 Λ 9.

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 3 : Interaction by Particle Exchange and QED. Recap

Solutions to Problem Set #1

12.1 Nondeterminism Nondeterministic Finite Automata. a a b ε. CS125 Lecture 12 Fall 2016

Transcription:

A Short Introution to Self-similr Groups Murry Eler* Asi Pifi Mthemtis Newsletter Astrt. Self-similr groups re fsinting re of urrent reserh. Here we give short, n hopefully essile, introution to them. 1. Introution 0 1 The figure ove shows (prt of) the infinite e inry tree, T. The is the noe (or vertex) t the top, n eh noe hs extly two noes elow it joine y n ege. It goes on forever own the pge. We hve lelle eh noe with inry numer in systemti wy if w is inry string lelling noe, then the two noes elow it joine y n ege re lelle w0 n w1. An utomorphism of T is ijetive mp from the noes to the noes whih preserves jenies, mening if two noes re joine y n ege, then the noes they mp to re gin joine y n ege. This efinition works for ny grph, ut we ll stik with T for now. Before we give n exmple, here is onvention whih will help esrie utomorphisms of T. Drwing t noe lelle y w (some inry string) mens exhnge the sutree with w0 n the sutree with w1, s inite here: n utomorphism hs severl s then it oesn t mtter in whih orer they re performe. Now for n exmple. Define to e the utomorphism of T whih fixes the, sens noes lelle 0w to 1w, n noes lelle 1w to 0w, where w is ny inry string (possily empty). The tree on the right shows wht T looks like fter is pplie. 0 1 1 0 10 11 00 01 100101110111000001010011 Applying twie puts T k s it strte, so we sy tht is the sme s the mp tht oes nothing to the tree. We ll the mp whih leves the tree unhnge the ientity, n enote it y the letter e. Note tht if n re utomorphisms of T, the nottion mens pply first then. For exmple, if is the utomorphism given y 0 then the reer n hek tht sens the noe lelle 00 to position 11 while sens it to 10. w0 w1 w00 w01 w10 w11 w w1 w0 w10 w11 w00 w01 The representtion of n utomorphism of T y T eorte y s is lle portrit of the utomorphism. Note tht every utomorphism of T n e expresse using this nottion (possily with infinitely mny s). One the move is performe we remove the, n we n verify tht with this efinition, if Invite tehnil pper, ommunite y Jon Borwein. The uthor s reserh is supporte y the Austrlin Reserh Counil. The inverse of n utomorphism x is n utomorphism y suh tht xy = e( = yx). Sine utomorphisms re ijetive mps, they hve inverses. If G is set of utomorphisms of T n their inverses, suh tht for eh x, y G the prouts Jnury 2013, Volume 3 No 1 17

Asi Pifi Mthemtis Newsletter xy n yx re lso in G, then the lgeri ojet we otin is lle group. 1 A goo wy to ensure the property tht prouts of G sty in G is to tke set of utomorphisms, sy n, their inverses (whih in this se re the sme), n let G e the set of ll finite prouts of these utomorphisms. In this se we sy G is generte y the set {, }, n n re the genertors. Whenever group is generte y finite set of elements (utomorphisms), we ll it finitely generte group. Here is nother wy to efine utomorphisms. Let w e inry string. The mp sens the noe lelle 0w to position 1w, n the noe lelle 1w to 0w, so we n esrie it using the following rules: (0w) = 1.e(w), (1w) = 0.e(w), where e(w) mens pply the ientity mp (o nothing) to the suffix w. More interesting re the rules esriing : (0w) = 0.e(w), (1w) = 0.(w). The first rule just sys tht noes on the left sutree of the re not hnge, ut the seon rule sys if noe lel strts with 1, pply to the suffix of the lel. Note tht the rules for uses n e, n the rules for only uses e, so the set {,, e} of utomorphisms n e esrie y self-referening or selfsimilr set of rules. Prouts of n n lso e expresse with rules of this form, for exmple (0w) = (1.e(w)) = 1.(e(w)) (i.e. pply e first to w then ), n (0w) = (0.e(w)) = 1.ee(w). Definition 1.1. Let G e group of utomorphisms of T. Then G is self-similr group if for eh g G, eh x {0, 1}, n eh inry string w, there is y {0, 1} n h G suh tht g(xw) = y.h(w). See [6] for more etils. Note tht the efinition esily extens to groups of utomorphisms of e n-ry trees, ut gin we will stik with inry trees for this pper. 2. Automt Another wy to esrie utomorphisms of T is y n utomton. Here is n exmple: 1 Groups re not just sets of utomorphisms of T they n e the onfigurtions of Ruik s ue, utomorphisms of grphs other thn T, ris, n mps of the rel line to itself. A group is just set with multiplition efine on it, so tht prouts of things in the set re lso in the set, suh tht the multiplition is ssoitive, it hs some ientity (like e) n eh element hs n inverse (eh x hs y so tht xy = e). 1/0 x 0/1 e This utomton hs two sttes lelle e n x. If we strt t the stte x n re the string 010, we follow the ege lelle 0/1, repling the first letter of the string y 1, then from the stte e we follow the ege, repling the seon letter 1 y 1, then (sine we re still in the stte e) we follow n keep the thir letter s 0. So the ege lel tells us how to rewrite the next letter of the string, n the stte tells us wht to o with the suffix of the string. If we strt t the stte e n re string, the string stys the sme. Exerise 2.1. Drw the portrit of the utomorphism x in this exmple. 2 Exerise 2.2. Drw the utomton enoing the rules for n in the previous setion. Exerise 2.3. If you know some si group theory, o you reognise the group generte y {x} 3 n the group generte y {, }? 3. Grigorhuk s Group Here is n exmple whih relly kike off the theory of self-similr (or utomton) groups. We strt with the utomton esriing the selfsimilr rules for five tions. 0/1 1/0 e If we strt t stte, we swith the first letter of the string, then move to stte e for the rest of the string. So is the sme tion s esrie t the strt (while isn t, sine it sens 00 to 01). Exerise 3.1. Write the self-similr rules for,,, y reing off the utomton. Here re portrits of, n (the perio 3 pttern keeps going ll the wy own). 2 Solutions for ll the exerises n e foun t www.ustms.org.u/gzette. 3 Hint: think of x n ting on w s oing something to inry numer (written kwrs). 18 Jnury 2013, Volume 3 No 1

Asi Pifi Mthemtis Newsletter Exerise 3.2. Using the portrits, or otherwise, work out wht,, n o. Whih utomorphisms re they the sme s? The Grigorhuk group is the self-similr group generte y,,,. If you i the exerises right, you woul hve foun some reltions etween letters. Eh genertor one twie is e, n is the sme s. It follows from these fts tht ny prout n e written more effiiently y never writing n never putting two letters,, next to eh other (sine =, =, = ). Tht is, every prout in the group n e reue to something of the form x 1 x 2... or x 1 x 2... where x i =, or. Exerise 3.3. Show tht is the sme utomorphism s. A finitely generte group G is si to e finitely presente if finite numer of reltions, sy u 1 = v 1,..., u n = v n where u i n v i re finite prouts of genertors (or inverses of genertors), suffie to show equlity etween ritrry prouts of genertors. Even though we hve foun few reltions tht the genertors,,, for Grigorhuk s group stisfy, like = = = = e, =, =, it is known tht Grigorhuk s group is not finitely presente. 4. Wor Prolem The wor prolem for finitely generte group is the following question: given wor (or finite prout) of genertors, is the prout equl to the ientity element or not? In the se of groups of utomorphisms of T, this is the sme s sking if prout of genertors puts T k in its originl onfigurtion. For exmple, oes nothing to the tree, so the nswer on this input is yes. 4 Here is n lgorithm (given y Grigorhuk) to solve the wor prolem for his group. Write the input wor in the form x 1 x 2... or x 1 x 2... where x i {,, }. Count the numer of letters. If it is o, we know tht the utomorphism it represents swithes the noes 0 n 1, so this wor is not the ientity. So suppose the numer of letters is even. If the wor strts with, write it s (x 1 )x 2 (x 3 )x 4..., n otherwise write it s x 1 (x 2 )x 3 (x 4 ).... Now 4 This follows from Exerise 3.3 sking if u = v in group is the sme s sking if uv 1 = e. we know the wor oes not swith the two noes t level 1. Wht oes it o to the sutree hnging from the noe 0? The suwor () hs the effet of oing wht oes to the sutree (hek this moves the sutree over to the right sie, then ts y swithing own the right sie of the sutree, then puts it k). Similrly we n work out tht () ts like on the sutree, n () ts like. In very similr wy, we n work out wht, n o to the sutree n flip it (so t like ) n oes nothing to it. So to work out wht the input wor oes to the sutree hnging from 0, we rewrite (x 1 )x 2 (x 3 )x 4... or x 1 (x 2 )x 3 (x 4 )... y repling n y, n y e, n,, y,, respetively. It s similr story for the sutree hnging from noe 1. Exerise 4.1. Work out the replement rules for,,,,, for the right sutree. We shoul now e le to see how this will turn into reursive lgorithm given sutree n wor in,,, ting on it, ount the numer of s, n if it is even, see wht hppens to the two sutrees (uner two rewritten (n shorter) wors). A goo exerise is to figure is out the worst-se time (n spe) omplexity of the lgorithm. A vrition of this lgorithm works for lrge lss of self-similr groups; see [6]. In generl, the wor prolem for n ritrry finitely generte group is n uneile prolem there re even finitely presente groups for whih, if we oul eie if given wor is the sme s the ientity, then we oul solve the Hlting prolem for Turing mhines, whih is unsolvle (see for exmple [5] for more etils). 5. Growth Grigorhuk s group is fmous euse it ws the first exmple of group hving intermeite growth. For group G generte y finite set of elements, efine the growth funtion f : N N y f (n) where f (n) is the numer of elements of G tht re equl to some prout of genertors of length t most n; the mximum vlue this funtion oul ttin is exponentil in the numer of genertors, sine there re k n strings of k letters of length n. Milnor ske if group oul hve growth funtion tht is superpolynomil, ut suexponentil (like f (n) = e n ), whih is lle intermeite, n Grigorhuk showe tht his group hs n intermeite growth funtion. Two exellent soures in whih to re ounts of this re [3] n [4]. Jnury 2013, Volume 3 No 1 19

Asi Pifi Mthemtis Newsletter Open Question 5.1. Is there finitely presente group of intermeite growth? 6. Shreier Grphs Whenever we hve group G generte y finite set G, ting on set X, n M is some suset of X, there is useful evie lle the Shreier grph, whih is efine s follows. A goo exmple to keep in min while reing this efinition is to tke X s the noes of T, M s the set of noes t some fixe level k of T, n G s self-similr group ting on T. For eh element of M rw noe lelle y this element. Connet noes m i, m j y irete ege lelle s G whenever m j = sm i. Note tht this grph is onnete if for ny two points in M there is lwys some group element (whih n e expresse s finite prout of genertors from G) whih tkes the point m i to m j. If this is stisfie, we sy tht G ts trnsitively on M. For exmple, if G is Grigorhuk s group, X = T, n M is the set of noes t level k, then the tion of G is trnsitive on M sine we n fin omintions of,,, whih move ny point to ny other in this level. Here re the Shreier grphs for Grigorhuk s group ting on levels 2 n 3: ontining ll elements whih fix noe t level k. Then the Shreier grph for G ting on G/H is the sme s the grph for G ting on T when M is the set of noes t level k. 7. Geoesis Eh element of finitely generte group is the prout of some numer of genertors. A prout of genertors is geoesi if there is no shorter prout tht equls the sme element. For exmple is not geoesi in the Grigorhuk group, ut is 5 If G is group with finite generting set G, the geoesi growth funtion for G with respet to G ounts the numer of geoesis of length (t most) n. It is ler tht this funtion is oune elow y the usul growth rte (sine eh element hs t lest one geoesi representing it), n oune ove y n exponentil funtion (sine there re k n strings of k letters of length n). In [1], groups with polynomil geoesi growth funtions re onsiere, n nturl extension to Milnor s question rises: Open Question 7.1. Is there group of intermeite geoesi growth? 11 01 00 10 The first exmple to try is Grigorhuk s group, sine the numer of geoesis of length n is t lest the numer of elements, so its geoesi growth is superpolynomil. 111 011 001 101 100 000 010 110 We n use the Shreier grphs of the Grigorhuk group to fin geoesis s follows. A wor of the form u = x 1 x 2... x n/2 lelling pth strting from the noe lelle 11... 1 n moving right (ening t noe we will ll k) enoes n To get the grph for the next level, we mke two opies of the grph for the previous level, ppen 1 to the noes in one opy n 0 to the other, flip the 0 opy then glue them together. The she lines inite where gluing ours to get level 3. In this wy we see some more self-similrity. Exerise 6.1. Drw the Shreier grph for level 4. More generlly, given ny group G with generting set G, n ny sugroup H, the set of left osets G/H is set on whih G ts trnsitively, so we n form Shreier grphs for G ting on G/H. If H is the trivil sugroup, then the Shreier grph oinies with nother stnr onstrution in group theory: the Cyley grph. If G is self-similr group ting trnsitively on eh level of T, let H e the sugroup of G utomorphism tht sens 11... 1 to k in T. Suppose v is prout of,,, tht lso sens 11... 1 to k. Then v lels pth in the Shreier grph, strting t 11... 1 n ening t k. Sine the Shreier grph esries ll possile wys of moving etween noes t fixe level of the tree, if v oes not trvel in stright line in this grph (like u oes) it hs no hope of sening 11... 1 to k. In other wors, no wor shorter thn u n e the sme group element s u. For eh x i we hve two hoies for,,, so there re 2 n/2 = ( 2) n ifferent wors of length n like this, so the geoesi growth funtion is exponentil. More etils n e foun in [2]. 5 Don t elieve me? Run the wor prolem lgorithm on u 1 for ll wors u of length t most three. 20 Jnury 2013, Volume 3 No 1

Asi Pifi Mthemtis Newsletter 8. Exmple: The Bsili Group Here is one more self-similr group. Let B e the group ting on T, generte y two utomorphisms, esrie y these self-similr rules: (0w) = 1(w), (1w) = 0e(w), (0w) = 0(w), (1w) = 1e(w). Exerise 8.1. Drw n utomton (with sttes lelle,, e) whih enoes these rules. Exerise 8.2. Drw the Shreier grph of the tion of B on level 2 of T. Here is the Shreier grph for level 3, whih shoul look like two opies of the Shreier grph for level 2, stuk together y reking some eges n reonneting. 101 111 011 001 100 000 010 110 Exerise 8.3. Drw the Shreier grph of the tion of B for levels 4, 5,... of T. Wht o you see? I hope this short introution might inspire some reers to explore the topi further. Some exellent strting points re [3], [4] n [6]. Aknowlegements I m extremely grteful to Nik Dvis, Slv Grigorhuk, Dim Krvhek, Zorn Šunić n Mike Whittker who hve tught me muh out the sujet. Referenes [1] Brison, M., Burillo, J., Eler, M. n Šunić, Z. (2012). On groups whose geoesi growth is polynomil. Internt. J. Alger Comput. 22 (to pper). [2] Eler, M., Gutiérrez, M. n Šunić, Z. Geoesis in the first Grigorhuk group. In preprtion. [3] Grigorhuk, R. n Pk, I. (2008). Groups of intermeite growth: n introution. Enseign. Mth. 54, 251 272. [4] Mnn, A. (2012). How Groups Grow (Lonon Mthemtil Soiety Leture Note Series 395). Cmrige University Press. [5] Miller III, C.F. (1992). Deision prolems for groups survey n refletions. In Algorithms n Clssifition in Comintoril Group Theory, es Bumslg, G. n Miller III, C.F. (Mth. Si. Res. Inst. Pul. 23), Springer, New York, pp. 1 59. [6] Nekrshevyh, V. (2005). Self-Similr Groups (Mthemtil Surveys n Monogrphs 117). Amerin Mthemtil Soiety, Proviene, RI. Murry Eler Murry.Eler@newstle.eu.u Murry Eler is n ARC Future Fellow t The University of Newstle. He i PhD t The University of Melourne working with Wlter Neumnn on utomti groups n geometri group theory, then took severl postos n leturing positions in the US n Sotln, efore returning to Austrli in 2008 when he seure temporry position t The University of Queensln. His reserh interests inlue forml lnguges n utomt, geometri group theory, omputtion n experimentl mthemtis, omplexity n omputility, n enumertive omintoris. Currently he hols permnent position t the Shool of Mthemtil n Physil Sienes, University of Newstle, University Drive, Cllghn NSW 2308, Austrli. Jnury 2013, Volume 3 No 1 21