Geography on Heterotic Orbifolds

Similar documents
Grand Unification and Strings:

Heterotic Brane World

Crosschecks for Unification

Strings and Particle Physics

Strings, Exceptional Groups and Grand Unification

The discrete beauty of local GUTs

String Phenomenology

Heterotic Supersymmetry

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 6 Mar 2014

Exploring the SO(32) Heterotic String

E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale

Predictions from F-theory GUTs. (High vs. low-scale SUSY; proton decay)

Heterotic Standard Models

Nucleon Decay. Stuart Raby. DUSEL 2010 Rapid City, SD October 2, 2010

Supersymmetric Standard Models in String Theory

Flavor structure in string theory

The Standard Model and beyond

ASPECTS OF FREE FERMIONIC HETEROTIC-STRING MODELS. Alon E. Faraggi

Coupling Selection Rules in Heterotic Orbifold Compactifications

Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models

Axion-Like Particles from Strings. Andreas Ringwald (DESY)

Neutrino Mass in Strings

String Phenomenology. Tatsuo Kobayashi

Physics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1

The Constrained E 6 SSM

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Towards Matter Inflation in Heterotic Compactifications

Grand Unification in the Heterotic Brane World

Physics of Type II and Heterotic SM & GUT String Vacua

Neutrinos: status, models, string theory expectations

F-theory and Particle Physics

Grand Unification. Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Gravity not included

Anomalies and Remnant Symmetries in Heterotic Constructions. Christoph Lüdeling

Grand Unification in the Heterotic Brane World

Pati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations

Neutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 21 Aug 2018

Proton Stability and Superstring Z

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 11 Oct 2004

Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised

THE DREAM OF GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES AND THE LHC. Latsis symposium, Zurich, Graham Ross

Phenomenological Aspects of Local String Models

SUPERSYMMETRIC STANDARD MODELS ON D-BRANES

multiplets and the chiral fields is the following:

SO(10) SUSY GUTs with family symmetries: the test of FCNCs

The correspondence between free fermionic models and orbifolds

Lepton-flavor violation in tau-lepton decay and the related topics

Grand Unified Theories

SU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs

Neutrino masses respecting string constraints

Neutrinos and Fundamental Symmetries: L, CP, and CP T

A NOTE ON R-PARITY VIOLATION AND FERMION MASSES. GÓMEZ and K. TAMVAKIS. Division of Theoretical Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Greece

Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra

Exotic Dark Matter as Spin-off of Proton Stability. Kaustubh Agashe (University of Maryland)

Unification of Flavor, CP, and Modular Symmetries

Gauge Threshold Corrections for Local String Models

THE QUEST FOR UNIFICATION

Lepton-flavor violation in tau-lepton decay and the related topics

Introduction to Supersymmetry

Unified Dark Matter. SUSY2014 Stephen J. Lonsdale. The University of Melbourne. In collaboration with R.R. Volkas. arxiv:

Proton Decay and GUTs. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) Durham July 20, 2005

125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification

A Domino Theory of Flavor

SM predicts massless neutrinos

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 24 Feb 2015

Final Exam: Sat. Dec. 18, 2:45-4:45 pm, 1300 Sterling Exam is cumulative, covering all material. From last time

Flavour and Higgs in Pati-Salam Models

How does neutrino confine GUT and Cosmology? July T. Fukuyama Center of Quantum Universe, Okayama-U

The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry and New Interactions

SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches

String Phenomenology ???

SUSY GUTs, DM and the LHC

Proton Decay Without GUT. Hitoshi Murayama (IAS) UCLA Dec 3, 2003

Anomalies and Discrete Symmetries in Heterotic String Constructions

Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Marina Cobal Fisica Sperimentale Nucleare e Sub-Nucleare

Electroweak and Higgs Physics

A Classification of 3-Family Grand Unification in String Theory I. The SO(10) and E 6 Models. Abstract

Probing the Planck scale with Proton Decay. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) ICRR Mozumi July 27, 2004

(BEYOND) THE STANDARD MODEL

Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC

Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology

BNV and LNV in MSSM. Mu-Chun Chen, University of California, Irvine

String Unification, Spaghetti Diagrams and Infra-Red Fixed Points

Non-Minimal SUSY Computation of observables and fit to exp

Lecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model

of Local Moduli in Local Models

Beyond the Standard Model

Massive Neutrinos and (Heterotic) String Theory

Photon Coupling with Matter, u R

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 11 Dec 2001

Neutrinos and flavour in a brane model

Hidden Sector Baryogenesis. Jason Kumar (Texas A&M University) w/ Bhaskar Dutta (hep-th/ ) and w/ B.D and Louis Leblond (hepth/ )

Aligned Natural Inflation

Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov

MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS

Theory and phenomenology of hidden U(1)s from string compactifications

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 18 Feb 2002

F. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King. arxiv:

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 6 Jun 1998

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 6 Feb 2004

Transcription:

Geography on Heterotic Orbifolds Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn and CERN, Geneva Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208, hep-th/0504117 StringPheno05 p.1/31

Outline Orbifold Compactification GUTs without GUT group Spinors of SO(10) An SO(10) Model with 3 Families Gauge group geography in extra dimensions Unification (sin 2 θ W ) Proton decay Yukawa textures and flavour symmetries Electroweak symmetry breakdown Outlook StringPheno05 p.2/31

Orbifold Compactification Orbifold compactifications combine the success of Calabi-Yau compactification calculability of torus compactification StringPheno05 p.3/31

Orbifold Compactification Orbifold compactifications combine the success of Calabi-Yau compactification calculability of torus compactification Fields can propagate Bulk (d = 10 untwisted sector) 3-Branes (d = 4 twisted sector fixed points) 5-Branes (d = 6 twisted sector fixed tori) StringPheno05 p.3/31

Z 3 Example StringPheno05 p.4/31

Z 3 Example Action of the space group on coordinates X i (θ k X) i + n α e i α, k = 0, 1, 2, i, α = 1,..., 6 Embed twist in gauge degrees of freedom X I (Θ k X) I I = 1,..., 16 StringPheno05 p.4/31

Results from the Z 3 Orbifold Successful model building with three families of quarks and leptons gauge group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) n doublet-triplet splitting mechanism for Yukawa suppression StringPheno05 p.5/31

Results from the Z 3 Orbifold Successful model building with three families of quarks and leptons gauge group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) n doublet-triplet splitting mechanism for Yukawa suppression Leads to a picture of GUTs without GUT group Incomplete gauge and Higgs multiplets Transparent geometric interpretation StringPheno05 p.5/31

Things to improve For models with SU(3) SU(2) U(1) gauge group, the Z 3 orbifold example is too rigid only fixed points and no fixed tori no normal grand unified picture (like SO(10)) no large string threshold corrections continuous Wilson lines too destructive value of sin 2 θ W 3/8 StringPheno05 p.6/31

Things to improve For models with SU(3) SU(2) U(1) gauge group, the Z 3 orbifold example is too rigid only fixed points and no fixed tori no normal grand unified picture (like SO(10)) no large string threshold corrections continuous Wilson lines too destructive value of sin 2 θ W 3/8 The only successful approach in the framework of the Z 3 orbifold might be SU(3) 3 trinification (Choi, Kim, 2003; Kim, 2004) StringPheno05 p.6/31

Some basic observations Gauge couplings meet at 10 16 10 17 GeV in the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) StringPheno05 p.7/31

Some basic observations Gauge couplings meet at 10 16 10 17 GeV in the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) See-saw mechanism for neutrino sector favours the interpretation of a family of quarks and leptons as a 16 dimensional spinor representation of SO(10) StringPheno05 p.7/31

Some basic observations Gauge couplings meet at 10 16 10 17 GeV in the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) See-saw mechanism for neutrino sector favours the interpretation of a family of quarks and leptons as a 16 dimensional spinor representation of SO(10) Model building in field theoretic orbifold GUTs in 5 and 6 dimensions seems to lead to promising results StringPheno05 p.7/31

Some basic observations Gauge couplings meet at 10 16 10 17 GeV in the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) See-saw mechanism for neutrino sector favours the interpretation of a family of quarks and leptons as a 16 dimensional spinor representation of SO(10) Model building in field theoretic orbifold GUTs in 5 and 6 dimensions seems to lead to promising results Can we incorporate this into a string theory description? StringPheno05 p.7/31

Five golden rules Family as spinor of SO(10) Incomplete multiplets N = 1 superymmetry in d = 4 Repetition of families from geometry Discrete symmetries of stringy origin StringPheno05 p.8/31

Five golden rules Family as spinor of SO(10) Incomplete multiplets N = 1 superymmetry in d = 4 Repetition of families from geometry Discrete symmetries of stringy origin Such a scheme should incorporate the successful structures of SO(10)-GUTs avoid (some of) the problems StringPheno05 p.8/31

Five golden rules Family as spinor of SO(10) Incomplete multiplets N = 1 superymmetry in d = 4 Repetition of families from geometry Discrete symmetries of stringy origin Such a scheme should incorporate the successful structures of SO(10)-GUTs avoid (some of) the problems We need more general constructions to identify remnants of SO(10) in string theory... StringPheno05 p.8/31

Z 2 Z 2 Orbifold Example θ 1 θ 2 θ 3 StringPheno05 p.9/31

Z 2 Z 2 Orbifold Example θ 1 θ 2 θ 3 3 twisted sectors (with 16 fixed tori in each) lead to a geometrical picture of... StringPheno05 p.9/31

Intersecting Branes StringPheno05 p.10/31

Three family SO(10) toy model A 16 θ 1 A 2 4 16 A 1 A 3 A 4 A 6 θ 2 A 3 A 5 A 2 A 6 θ 3 16 A 1 A 5 Localization of families at various fixed tori StringPheno05 p.11/31

Zoom on first torus... e 2 θ 1 e 1 e 2 θ 2 e 2 e 1 θ 3 e 1 Interpretation as 6-dim. model with 3 families on branes StringPheno05 p.12/31

second torus... e 4 θ 1 e 4 e 3 e 4 θ 2 e 3 e 3 θ 3... 2 families on branes, one in (6d) bulk... StringPheno05 p.13/31

Three family SO(10) toy model A 16 θ 1 A 2 4 16 A 1 A 3 A 4 A 6 θ 2 A 3 A 5 A 2 A 6 θ 3 16 A 1 A 5 Localization of families at various fixed tori StringPheno05 p.14/31

third torus θ 1 e 6 e 6 θ 2 e 6 e 5 e 5 θ 3 e 5... 1 family on brane, two in (6d) bulk. StringPheno05 p.15/31

Model building We can easily find models with gauge group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) 3 families of quarks and leptons doublet-triplet splitting (Kobyashi, Raby, Zhang, 2004) (Förste, HPN, Vaudrevange, Wingerter, 2004) (Buchmüller, Hamaguchi, Lebedev, Ratz, 2004) (Giedt, Kane, Langacker, Nelson, 2005) StringPheno05 p.16/31

Model building We can easily find models with gauge group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) 3 families of quarks and leptons doublet-triplet splitting (Kobyashi, Raby, Zhang, 2004) (Förste, HPN, Vaudrevange, Wingerter, 2004) (Buchmüller, Hamaguchi, Lebedev, Ratz, 2004) (Giedt, Kane, Langacker, Nelson, 2005) Related heterotic constructions: fermionic formulation Calabi Yau compactification (talk of Faraggi) (talks of Ovrut, Honecker) StringPheno05 p.16/31

Model building (II) Key properties of the models depend on geometry: family symmetries texture of Yukawa couplings number of families local gauge groups on branes electroweak symmetry breakdown StringPheno05 p.17/31

Model building (II) Key properties of the models depend on geometry: family symmetries texture of Yukawa couplings number of families local gauge groups on branes electroweak symmetry breakdown We need to exploit these geometric properties... StringPheno05 p.17/31

Gauge group geography SO(10) E 6 SO(10) E 6 SO(10) E 6 E 6 E 6 SO(10) SO(10) E 6 StringPheno05 p.18/31

Gauge group geography SU(5) SO(10) SO(10) SO(10) SU(5) SU(5) SU(5) SU(5) SU(6) SU(2) SU(6) SU(2) SU(6) SU(2) StringPheno05 p.19/31

Gauge group geography: Pati-Salam SU(8) SU(6) SU(2) E 6 SU(6) SU(2) SU(4) 2 SO(10) SU(6) SU(2) E 6 SU(6) SU(2) SU(8) StringPheno05 p.20/31

Gauge geography: Standard Model SU(4) 2 SU(3) 2 SU(6) SU(2) SU(3) 2 SU(4) SU(2) 2 SU(4) SU(2) 2 SO(10) SU(5) SU(5) SU(6) SU(2) StringPheno05 p.21/31

The Memory of SO(10) SO(10) is realized in the higher dimensional theory broken in d = 4 incomplete multiplets StringPheno05 p.22/31

The Memory of SO(10) SO(10) is realized in the higher dimensional theory broken in d = 4 incomplete multiplets There could still be remnants of SO(10) symmetry 16 of SO(10) at some branes correct hypercharge normalization R-parity family symmetries that are very useful for realistic model building... StringPheno05 p.22/31

Proton decay R-parity from SO(10) memory avoids dangerous dimension-4 operators No proton decay via dimension-5 operators because of doublet-triplet splitting Avoid SO(10) brane for first family: suppressed p-decay via dimension-6 operators Thus the proton could be practically stable! StringPheno05 p.23/31

Unification SO(10) memory provides a reasonable value of sin 2 θ W and a unified definition of hypercharge presence of fixed tori allows for large threshold corrections at the high scale to match string and unification scale Yukawa unification from SO(10) memory for third family (on an SO(10) brane) no Yukawa unification for first and second family required StringPheno05 p.24/31

Yukawa textures and family symmetries Yukawa couplings depend on location of Higgs and matter fields Exponential suppression if fields at distant branes neutrino masses need some bulk mixing (one might need anti-families) GUT relations could be partially present, depending on the nature of the brane (e.g. SO(10) brane) family symmetries arise if different fields live on the same brane StringPheno05 p.25/31

It s a long way to go Full classification seems to be too difficult (at the moment). Work in progress: StringPheno05 p.26/31

It s a long way to go Full classification seems to be too difficult (at the moment). Work in progress: SO(32) classification (with SO(10) spinors) (Choi, Groot Nibbelink, Trapletti, 2004) (Ramos-Sanchez et al., 2005) StringPheno05 p.26/31

It s a long way to go Full classification seems to be too difficult (at the moment). Work in progress: SO(32) classification (with SO(10) spinors) (Choi, Groot Nibbelink, Trapletti, 2004) (Ramos-Sanchez et al., 2005) (partial) classification of Z 2 Z 2 and Z 2 Z 3 (Wingerter et al., 2005) StringPheno05 p.26/31

It s a long way to go Full classification seems to be too difficult (at the moment). Work in progress: SO(32) classification (with SO(10) spinors) (Choi, Groot Nibbelink, Trapletti, 2004) (Ramos-Sanchez et al., 2005) (partial) classification of Z 2 Z 2 and Z 2 Z 3 (Wingerter et al., 2005) smooth breakdown of gauge group (Förste, HPN, Wingerter, 2005) StringPheno05 p.26/31

Smooth gauge symmetry breakdown......can be achieved via continuous Wilson lines. The aim is: StringPheno05 p.27/31

Smooth gauge symmetry breakdown......can be achieved via continuous Wilson lines. The aim is: rank reduction electroweak symmetry breakdown breakdown of Trinification or Pati-Salam group to the Standard Model gauge group StringPheno05 p.27/31

Smooth gauge symmetry breakdown......can be achieved via continuous Wilson lines. The aim is: rank reduction electroweak symmetry breakdown breakdown of Trinification or Pati-Salam group to the Standard Model gauge group Continuous Wilson lines require specific embeddings of twist in the gauge group are too destructive in the Z 3 case are more promising for Z 2 twists (Ibanez, HPN, Quevedo, 1987) StringPheno05 p.27/31

An example We consider a model that has E 6 gauge group in the bulk of a 6d orbifold. The breakdown pattern is E 6 SO(10) U(1) via a Z 2 twist StringPheno05 p.28/31

An example We consider a model that has E 6 gauge group in the bulk of a 6d orbifold. The breakdown pattern is E 6 SO(10) U(1) via a Z 2 twist SO(10) SU(4) SU(2) SU(2) via a discrete (quantized) Wilson line StringPheno05 p.28/31

An example We consider a model that has E 6 gauge group in the bulk of a 6d orbifold. The breakdown pattern is E 6 SO(10) U(1) via a Z 2 twist SO(10) SU(4) SU(2) SU(2) via a discrete (quantized) Wilson line SU(4) SU(2) SU(2) SU(3) SU(2) U(1) via a continuous Wilson line (Förste, HPN, Wingerter, 2005) StringPheno05 p.28/31

Pati-Salam breakdown e 6 SO(10) U(1) Pati-Salam U(1) SU(6) SU(2) W 6 SU(5) U(1) SU(3) SU(2) U(1) 2 SU(3) SU(2) U(1) 2 SU(3) 2 U(1) SO(10) U(1) Pati-Salam U(1) W 5 SU(6) SU(2) e 5 StringPheno05 p.29/31

Ultraviolet Completion Such d = 6 models should find their ultraviolet completion in a consistent 10d string theory orbifold. StringPheno05 p.30/31

Ultraviolet Completion Such d = 6 models should find their ultraviolet completion in a consistent 10d string theory orbifold. The above breakdown chain, for example, could describe the smooth breakdown of SU(4) SU(2) SU(2) SU(3) SU(2) U(1) in model A1 of (Kobyashi, Raby, Zhang, 2004) StringPheno05 p.30/31

Ultraviolet Completion Such d = 6 models should find their ultraviolet completion in a consistent 10d string theory orbifold. The above breakdown chain, for example, could describe the smooth breakdown of SU(4) SU(2) SU(2) SU(3) SU(2) U(1) in model A1 of (Kobyashi, Raby, Zhang, 2004) Ultimately the mechanism should be used for the description of the Higgs mechanism of electroweak symmetry breakdown SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Y SU(3) U(1) EM in the standard model StringPheno05 p.30/31

Conclusion Heterotic string compactifications might lead to models that incorporate all the successful ingredients of grand unified theories, while avoiding the problematic ones. spinor representations of SO(10) geometric origin of (three) families incomplete multiplets supersymmetric unification R-parity absence of proton decay gauge-yukawa unification (partial GUT relations) discrete family symmetries StringPheno05 p.31/31