&AC-PUB-608 June 1969 VW WW A SURFACE-WAVE DESCRIPTION OF 7r+p BACKWARD SCATTERING* Howard C. Bryant** Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT We report the results of fitting the Regge pole portion of the amplitude of 1-I. M. Nussenzveig s impenetrable sphere solution to r p backward scattering measurements. The fits, which require determination of the location of a pole in the complex angular momentum plane (2 parameters), are made to data at 14 different energies from 2 to 17 G~V, and range in quality from good to indifferent. The locus of fitted poles on the angular momentum plane determines a trajectory similar to, but closer to the real axis than that of the lowest Nussenzveig-Regge surface pole. A study of fits at 5.2 and 6.9 GeV/c,in which the overall normalization of the data was varied, indicates that the magnitude of the backscattered pion cross section is near optimum for consistency with the surface-wave description. (Submitted to Phys. Rev. ) * Work support& by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. ** On lcave from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
I. INTRODUCTION The striking similarity of backward-positive-pion-proton scattering above about 2 GeV to alpha scattering by light, spinless nuclei in the energy range from 20 to 50 MeV, and to the meteorological phenomenon of the glory, has been pointed oc t. 1 H. M. Nussenzveig has recently discussed2 the scalar version of the meteorological glory (scattering of a plane wave by a real, square-well poten- tial) and has shown that backward scattering is completely dominated by Regge poles which can be associated with surface waves in the high-frequency limit. Surface waves (creep v~aves)3 occur in scattering problems for which the index of refraction or potential changes within a distance small compared to the wavelength and can be thought of as a kind of diffraction in which the scattered flux appears to come from a damped traveling wave skirting around the scattering center in the neighborhood of its surface. Probably the simplest scattering problem in which surface waves play an important role is that of scattering a scalar wave by an impenetrable sphere, which has been treated in great detail in the high frequency limit by 1-I. M. Nussenzveig. 4 The scattering amplitude in the large angle regions breaks up naturally to two terms: one results from Regge poles and describes surface waves and the other comes from a line integral and can be shown to represent specular reflection in the high frequency limit. II. A h!lodel OF THE 7r+-PROTON LARGE ANGLE ELASTIC SCATTERING *we conjecture that the large angle elastic scattering is due. to a surfacewave type interaction havin, v the functional form of the Rcgge-pole part of the impcnctrable sphere problem. We neglect any contributi,on from specular rcflcctions and allolv the positions of the poles to be clet.crmined by the data. -2-
III. NUSSEN ZVEIG S SOLUTION Nussenzveig s expression for the scattering amplitude of a scalar wave by an impenetrable sphere can be written (4, Eq. 9.54) for p -l/3 CC O_<nas f(k, 0) = fr + fs (1) where fr is the isotropic amplitude produced by specular reflecticn and fs is the contribution from the Regge poles : f = s - (2) where a is the radius of the sphere p = ka, where k is 27r times the wave number 8 is the scattering angle hn is the location on the complex angular momentum plane of the nth Regge pole Ai is the derivative of the Airy function -xn is the nth zero of the Airy function Jo is the zero-order Bessel function of complex argument. For the hard sphere, the Regge poles are located at (4, Eq. 3.5) X,(p) = /3 + (P/a)1 3xnei /3c O(p-1/3) (3) for /3 >> 1; x1 = 2.34. The locations for arbitrary p can be determined from the zeros of the llankel functions of the first kind, for which simple expressions exist. 5 Considcrntion of the magnitudes of the terms in the fs series leads to the neglect of all but the terni m = 0, n = 1 of Eq. (2). To simplify somewhat our -3-
fitting procedure we write: fs in/3 w[+jj 2 -e (Rehl/k) (ReA,/2) 3 2 Jo[$t. -~,3 (4), Ai (-Xn) giving us two parameters ReXl and ImXl, the location on the complex plane of the position of the first surface-wave pole, We abandon the requirement that the pole satisfy Eq. (3). IV. THE BESSEL FUNCTION For our fits we write J,(Z) M = C (-lp( ;) n=q w where M = 20 for our machine (single precision) 2n calculations. (5) It is instructive to see the effect of small imaginary component of z on Jo. Butting z = x + iy, we get n 2n-1 I Jo(z) = Jo(x) + i 2y 2 (-I) x2 + O(r2). n=o (n! ) (6) Qualitatively, combining Eq. (6) with Eq. (4), we note the following features: (1) The position of the dip in the 7r p cross section determines ReXI. Note that Jo(x) = 0 at x = 2.44. (2) The overall normalization is determined by ImXl in the exponential. (3) The deviation from zero (filling in) at the dip of the amplitude is di- rectlypreporitional to Imhl. V. THE FITS Table 1 summarizes our fits of Eq. 4 to 14 sets of r+p data, WC exclude points for which ReAl(n-0) < 6.0. The positions of the pole on the complex - 4,-
plane arc shown in Fig. 1. Plots of the data and the surface pole curves arc shown in Fig. 2. The ordinates arc normalized to 1 and the abscissae are (ReXI) (x-6). As a test of the uniqueness of the fits the over?! normalizations for the data at 5.2 and 6. S,(Figs. 2i and 21~) were altered, and the data were then fitted. Figure 3 shows the X2 for the fit vs. the factor multiplying the cross sections and their errors. This clearly shows that the order of magnitudes of the cross sections are just about optimum for compatibility with the surface- wave formula, and tends to rule against the accidental success of these fits. VI. DISCUSSION (1) The fits appear to be comi>arable with those obtained using the Reggeized baryon exchange models a For example, K. P. Pretzl finds a 2 of 155 for a six parameter fit to his data (5.2 and 6.9 GeV), whereas we ob- tain a 2 of 70.3 for the same data. (2) The radius of the pion-proton interaction of about 0.9 F seems quite reasonable. Note that this is not an independent parameter, but is given by Reh/k. (3) (4) The overail normalization in most cases agrees well with the size of the cross section at the dip. The position of the pole on the complex angular momentum plane seems to follow a smooth trajectory for p,,> 3 C&V. There seems to be some sort of threshold from 2 to 3 GeV. (5) Deviations of the data from the model appear to be definitely present for large values ReAl(n-0). The data seem to be dropping off, and the model seems to be staying constant or increasing as this paramctcr increases above 6.
VII. CONCLUSION In the region of backward scattering, the n+p data seem to fit reasonably well a one-pole Regge-type model contained in Nussenzveig s solution to the problem of high frequency scattering by an impenetrable sphere. This pole, which can be associated semiclassically with surface waves, seems to be typical of interactions with rather abrupt transition regions. If our interpretation is correct, the backward scattering of 7r+ by protons must be due to a strongly absorptive interaction between the pion and the proton which sets in rather abruptly when the two particles are separated by a distance of about 1 Fermi, This mechanism seems to dominate above 2 or 3 C&V. It remains to be seen if any connection can be established with the currently standard Reggeized-baryon-trajectory exchanges used to explain backward scat- tering, and if the model can be elaborated to include spin and to make predications for the other two pion charge states. VIII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to M. L. Perl, E. A. Paschos, and H. M. Nussenzveig for their helpful comments. -6-
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. H. C. Bryant and N. Jarmie, Ann. Phys. (N.Y. ) 47, 127 (1968). - H. M. Nussenzveig, J. Math.Phys. 10, 82; 10, 125 (1969). - - R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, (MC Graw Hill, New York 1966). 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. H. M. Nussenzveig, Ann. Phys. (N.Y. ) 34, 23 (1965). - _. J. B. Keller, S. I. Rubinow, and M. Goldstein, J. Math. Phys. 4, 829 (1963). K. P. Pretzl, thesis,.mtinchen, Germany (1968). A. S. Carroll et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 607 (1968). - D. P. Owen et al., Preprint CLNS-50, (1969). -- W. F. Baker et al.,,nu:,!. Phys. E, 249 (1969). --
TABLE 1: Summary of Surface-Pole Fits to Backward r+p Scattering p* Radius dc du 7r Reh Imh # points X2 Ref. 2.28 Gev/c.783 Fermis 524..@b/&V/c)2 3.73.886 17 44.0 7 2.48.881 873. 4.41,844 14 39.6 7 2.58,839 1011. 4.29.795 15 47.0 7 2.78.876 990. 4.68.807 14 23.4 7 2.85.953 547. 5.17.935 9 7.8 9 2.93 3.30 3.55 5.20 5.91 6.90 9.85 13.73. 17.07.837.995.938 1.002 1.027 1.037.990.914 1. oo* 454. 4.61.906 14 26.8 160. 5.86 1.13 6 1.0 143. 5.76 1.12 11 9.9 40.6 7. 59 1.30 29 22.3 28.2 8.33 1.35 20 253. 15.7 9.14 1.43 19 48. 0 2.78 10.53 1.65 16 172..46 11.56 1.87 10 105. 1.81 14.14 1.66 2 1.2 * LII this case the radius was set to 1 F, since there are only two points and they have very large errors.
FIGURE CAPTIONS 1. Positions of surface-wave plane for the fitted data. Regge poles on the complex angular momentum 2. Surface-wave fits to the backward angular distributions. All curves have been normalized to 1 at 180. 3. X2 vs. factor multiplying the measured cross sections for data at 5.2 and 6.9 GeV,. This demonstrates the sensitivity of the model to the overall normalization.
4 E I
a 2.28 GeV g 3.3 GeV e 2.85 GeV h 3.35 GeV 5.2 GeV i.. j k :t : t m 13.73 GeV n 17.07 GeV 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 ( Re X,) (~6) - 1.0 0.1 l BACK GEOMETRY 0 INTERMEDIATE GEOMETRY 0.01 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 1327D2 (ReX,)k 6 ) - Fig. 2
120 plll I l I III I I I I X2 vs NORMALIZATION 100 FOR SURFACE -WAVE FIT I 80 X2 60 40 20 0 Ii I IIIII l I I I I I IO 2 I I 2 loo FACTOR MULTIPLYING MEASURED 1327A3 CROSS SECTIONS (AND ERRORS) - Fig. 3