763620SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 8 Autumn 2015

Similar documents
ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Classical Mechanics and Statistical/Thermodynamics. August 2018

Exam TFY4230 Statistical Physics kl Wednesday 01. June 2016

Gases and the Virial Expansion

Physics 525, Condensed Matter Homework 8 Due Thursday, 14 th December 2006

Physics 127b: Statistical Mechanics. Lecture 2: Dense Gas and the Liquid State. Mayer Cluster Expansion

Classical Field Theory

PDEs in Spherical and Circular Coordinates

The Time Arrow of Spacetime Geometry

AST1100 Lecture Notes

Examination paper for FY2450 Astrophysics

Cosmology and particle physics

Graduate Written Examination Fall 2014 Part I

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

Quantum Statistics (2)

Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Georgia

Relative Sizes of Stars. Today Exam#3 Review. Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Blackbody Radiation

Fundamental Stellar Parameters. Radiative Transfer. Stellar Atmospheres

The Theory of Inflationary Perturbations

1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate

Exam #3. Final Exam. Exam 3 review. How do we measure properties of a star? A detailed outline of study topics is here:

Qualifying Exam. Aug Part II. Please use blank paper for your work do not write on problems sheets!

Dark Energy vs. Dark Matter: Towards a unifying scalar field?

Modern Physics notes Spring 2005 Paul Fendley Lecture 38

Cosmologists dedicate a great deal of effort to determine the density of matter in the universe. Type Ia supernovae observations are consistent with

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Topics Covered: Motion in a central potential, spherical harmonic oscillator, hydrogen atom, orbital electric and magnetic dipole moments

Gravity, Strings and Branes

Physics 218: Waves and Thermodynamics Fall 2003, James P. Sethna Homework 11, due Monday Nov. 24 Latest revision: November 16, 2003, 9:56

The quantum Vacuum, Dark Energy & Dark Matter

PART I Qualifying Examination. August 22, 2017, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.

FXA ρ 0 = 3(H 0 ) 2. UNIT G485 Module Universe Evolution. Candidates should be able to : age of the universe 1/H 0

Physics 161 Homework 3 - Solutions Wednesday September 21, 2011

Physics 607 Final Exam

Part IA QUALIFYING EXAM. November 20, :30-11:30 AM NAME TOTAL

Introduction and Fundamental Observations

Announcements. Homework. Set 8now open. due late at night Friday, Dec 10 (3AM Saturday Nov. 11) Set 7 answers on course web site.

AST111 PROBLEM SET 6 SOLUTIONS

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2006 Solution Set 4

On The Origin of Universe

Lecture 03. The Cosmic Microwave Background

Today. Announcements. Big Bang theory cont d Introduction to black holes

Gravity, Strings and Branes

Physics 161 Homework 7 - Solutions Wednesday November 16, 2011

Timeline of the Big Bang Announcements:

FURTHER COSMOLOGY Book page T H E M A K E U P O F T H E U N I V E R S E

Clusters: Context and Background

Physics Oct A Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 22, March 20, 2006

Clusters and Percolation

Final Exam - Solutions PHYS/ECE Fall 2011

PHYS 328 HOMEWORK 10-- SOLUTIONS

Clusters: Context and Background

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation A Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation

2013 CAP Prize Examination

Cosmology holography the brain and the quantum vacuum. Antonio Alfonso-Faus. Departamento de Aerotécnia. Madrid Technical University (UPM), Spain

Chapter 9 Problem Solutions

THERMAL HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE

HNRS 227 Lecture 18 October 2007 Chapter 12. Stars, Galaxies and the Universe presented by Dr. Geller

The Expanding Universe

University of Michigan Physics Department Graduate Qualifying Examination

Final Exam Practice Solutions

Computational Applications in Nuclear Astrophysics using JAVA

Neutron Star) Lecture 22

Problem Set 7: Solutions

Outline. Black Holes. Schwartzchild radius River Model of a Black Hole Light in orbit Tidal forces

Answer TWO of the three questions. Please indicate on the first page which questions you have answered.

TOPIC V BLACK HOLES IN STRING THEORY

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Oct 2016

Cosmic Microwave Background

2015 Lloyd G. Elliott University Prize Exam Compiled by the Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manitoba

8.04 Spring 2013 February 13, 2013 Problem 1. (15 points) Radiative collapse of a classical atom

The Nature of Light I: Electromagnetic Waves Spectra Kirchoff s Laws Temperature Blackbody radiation

Equilibrium Properties of Matter and Radiation

Quantum Chemistry I : CHEM 565

COSMIC INFLATION AND THE REHEATING OF THE UNIVERSE

equals the chemical potential µ at T = 0. All the lowest energy states are occupied. Highest occupied state has energy µ. For particles in a box:

(1) Consider a lattice of noninteracting spin dimers, where the dimer Hamiltonian is

A GENERAL RELATIVITY WORKBOOK. Thomas A. Moore. Pomona College. University Science Books. California. Mill Valley,

Lecture 3 (Part 1) Physics 4213/5213

Atom Model and Relativity

Syllabus: Physics 241 Introduction to Modern Physics Professor Marshall Onellion (office)

Part II Statistical Physics


PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m.- 9:30 a.m.

10 Supercondcutor Experimental phenomena zero resistivity Meissner effect. Phys463.nb 101

OSU Physics Department Comprehensive Examination #115

The Cosmic Microwave Background

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA PHYSICS DEPARTMENT. PART I Qualifying Examination. August 20, 2013, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Cosmology. Chapter 18. Cosmology. Observations of the Universe. Observations of the Universe. Motion of Galaxies. Cosmology

General Relativity and Cosmology. The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang

Chapter 23 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Fate of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.

Model Universe Including Pressure

Two Lectures on Physics

The Interiors of the Stars

A A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:

E = φ 1 A The dynamics of a particle with mass m and charge q is determined by the Hamiltonian

Spacetime versus the Quantum

The first 400,000 years

Transcription:

76360SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 8 Autumn 05. Thermodynamics of a Black Hole The energy and entropy for a non-rotating black hole of mass M can be defined as E = Mc S = k BA, 8πl P where A = 4πR is the surface area of the black hole, with R = GM/c the Schwarzschild radius, and l P = G/c 3 is the Planck length, and the gravitation constant G = 6.673 0 Nm /(kg). Calculate the temperature of the black hole as a function of mass using thermodynamical identities. Black hole radiates like an (almost) perfect black body (why?). Calculate the radiation power P and the timescale associated with the loss of mass, τ = E/P. Calculate the temperature T and lifetime τ in years for a black hole of mass 0 kg. Currently the Universe is filled with radiation of T.7 K, as a remnant of the Big Bang. How does this affect the development of the above black hole (qualitatively). Solution: We can find the temperature of the black hole by calculating ( ) S(E, V, N) T =. E We can easily express S in terms of E by plugging in the area of black hole, then its radius in terms of its mass, and finally setting M = E/c : V N S = k B 4πR = 8πl P k ( ) B GM 4π = k ( ) B GE 4π = k BG E. 8πl P c 8πl P c 4 c 8 l P Temperature turns out to be inversely proportional to E and consequently to M as well: T = 4k BG c 8 l P E = 4k BG M T = c6 l P c 6 l P 4k B G M = c3 4Gk B M.

Obviously, a black hole is a perfect absorber (how it can emit particles is a longer story!). The radiation power can be found using the formula, derived elsewhere (Problem 7.5): P = 4πR σt 4. One merely plugs in R, T and σ = π kb 4 as a function of M to get the power and lifetime 60 3 c τ: ( ) ( ) GM c 3 4 P = 4π σ = c6 π 3 c 4Gk B M 960G M, τ = 960G π 3 c 4 M 3. More massive the black hole is, the longer it will be around. Fixing the mass, M = 0 kg, we get some definite values for T, P, and τ: T = 7.7 0 K, P = 5.55 0 W, τ = 5.3 0 9 a. Although the cosmic microwave background radiation will slow down the evaporation of this black hole, it will only get hotter as its mass radiates away. Should it have been more (much more) massive, it could have become cool enough to reach thermal equilibrium with the CMB and thus survive much longer.. Gregarious Bosons Consider a Bose-Einstein condensate with all N bosons in the single-particle ground state ψ 0 Ψ(r, r,..., r N ) = ψ 0 (r ) ψ(r N ). Suppose a new particle is gently injected into the system, into an equal superposition of the M lowest single-particle states φ(r ) = M ( ψ0 (r ) + ψ (r ) + + ψ (r ) ). The state Φ(r,..., r ) of the N + -boson system after the insertion is obtained by symmetrizing the product function Ψ(r, r,..., r N )φ(r ). Calculate the symmetrized initial state of the system with the injected particle. Show that the probability that the new boson enters the ground state is enhanced by a factor N + of its probability to enter the ground state in an empty space. (Hint: First do it for N =.)

Solution: To symmetrize the given wavefunction, we simply sum over all the possible permutations of the parameters {r i }. Denoting by P (s) all the permutations of a sequence s, the symmetrized Φ reads: Φ(r,..., r ) Ψ(r p, r p,..., r pn )φ(r p ), p P (,...,) where N is a normalization factor (which will magically absorb any constant coefficients), to be determined later. For N = the above becomes: Φ(r, r ) Ψ(r )φ(r ) + Ψ(r )φ(r ) ψ 0 (r ) ψ m (r ) + ψ 0 (r ) ψ m (r ) M M m=0 ψ 0 (r )ψ 0 (r ) + ψ 0 (r ) m=0 ψ m (r ) + ψ 0 (r )ψ 0 (r ) + ψ 0 (r ) ψ 0 (r )ψ 0 (r ) + ψ 0 (r ) ψ m (r ) + ψ 0 (r ) ψ m (r ). ψ m (r ) Note now that the terms appearing in the last line above are all mutually orthogonal, and that only the first term (appearing with twice the amplitude of the other ones) has all the particles in the ground state. Normalization constant is then N = + (M ), and the probability of observing the new particle in the ground state is P (All at ground state) = N. The asked ratio of ground state to excited state probabilities is P (All at ground state) P (Not all at ground state) = P (All at ground state) P (All at ground state) = 4 4 + (M ) 4 = M. Since the probability of finding φ(r) = m ψ m(r)/ M in the ground state is clearly /M, the above ratio is simply /(M ). We see that in the symmetrized case, that probability is + times higher. So does this hold for general N? One can pretty much now guess the form of the symmetrized Φ from what we got above: adding one more particle into the ground state will increase the amplitude of the ground state by one, and introduce one more M term 3

into Φ, just with different permutation of r,,3. But let us for completeness go through the above steps for general N: Φ(r,..., r ) p P (,...,) Ψ(r p, r p,..., r pn )φ(r p ), p P (,...,k,k+,...,) Ψ(r p, r p,..., r pn ) φ(r k ), N!Ψ(r,..., r k, r k+,..., r )φ(r k ) Ψ(r,..., r k, r k+,..., r ) ψ m (r k ) M m=0 Single out the p index; rename it to say k and sum it separately, taking care to remove the k term from the permutation p summation. Since Ψ(r,..., r N ) is already symmetric, each term in the permutation summation is just the same; replace the sum by the factor N!Ψ(r,..., r k, r k+,..., r ). Next just remember that Ψ is simply a product of ground state wave functions: Φ(r,..., r ) Ψ(r,..., r k, r k+,..., r )ψ 0 (r k ) }{{} Ψ(r,...,r ) (N + )Ψ(r,..., r ) + + Ψ(r,..., r k, r k+,..., r ) ψ 0 (r ) ψ 0 (r k )ψ m (r k )ψ 0 (r k+ ) ψ 0 (r ) ψ m (r k ) Again, we have the ground state term appearing with the amplitude N +, and the rest (N + )(M ) terms with amplitudes. In each term a single-particle state with a different r k is raised to a different excited state m. Therefore, all terms are mutually orthogonal and so the normalization is N = (N + ) + (N + )(M ) = (N + )(N + M). The ratio of ground state to excited state probabilities is then P (All at ground state) P (All at ground state) = (N + ) (N + )(N + M) (N + ) + M. Indeed. This is again N + times larger than the value for φ. The preferrability of the ground state increases by a factor of N + after the new particle is injected into the condensate, compared to it being in empty space. 4

3. Bohr-van Leeuwen Theorem Consider a system of charged particles (not dipoles), obeying classical mechanics and classical statistics. Show that the magnetic susceptibility of this system is identically zero. Solution: Suppose B = Bẑ, and use the Landau gauge to express the vector potential A, A = Bxŷ. The Hamiltonian (expressed in canonical momenta that include the vector potential) reads H = P x + (P y qbx) + Pz + eφ(x, y, z) m where φ is the scalar potential. Magnetization can again be evaluated using the formula M = ln Z, β B Z = Z N, Z = e βh d 3 x d 3 P. It is quite easy to now see that Z is independent of B: Z = e βh d 3 x d 3 P = = { P exp β x + (P y qbx) + Pz m { exp β P x + P y + P z m } + eφ(x, y, z) } + eφ(x, y, z) d 3 x d 3 P d 3 x d 3 P Change of variable P y P y + qbx; integration bounds still... Notice that B has now disappeard from Z! Since Z / B = 0, must then the magnetization M, and consequently, the susceptibility be also zero. As a quick proof of the applicability of the our equation for the magnetization, note that we can write the Hamiltonian also in terms of the kinetic momenta p, and a potential associated with the external magnetic field: H = p m m B + V (r) where m = qr p/m is the magnetic moment of a point charge on a circular path. Upon inspection of ln Z / B, the formula for the magnetization M quickly follows. 4. Cluster Expansion Derive the following expressions for the virial coefficients in terms of cluster integrals b l : B = b = d 3 r e βu(r) B 3 = 4b b 3 B 4 = 0b 3 + 8b b 3 3b 4. 5

Calculate the nd virial coefficient for a gas of hard spheres (u(r < d) =, u(r d) = 0), and a gas with a hard core and attractive box -potential u(r < d) =, u(d r < R) = a, u(r R) = 0. Solution: We have the following two expansions: p = k B T b k λ 3k T e bkµ, ρ = k b k e bkµ, λ 3k T and we are to find the values of the coefficients B, B 3, and B 4 in Let us denote x = e bµ λ 3 T, and p = k B T (ρ + B ρ + B 3 ρ 3 + B 4 ρ 4 + ). p = k B T r, r = k b k x k, ρ = k kb k x k. We can simply set r ρ B ρ B 3 ρ 3 B 4 ρ 4 + = 0 and expand everything in powers of x, equate the coefficients of like powers, and from the resulting set of three equations solve the asked quantities. One only needs to expand up to the fourth power: b x + b x + b 3 x 3 + b 4 x 4 + = 0 b x b x 3b 3 x 3 4b 4 x 4 B b x + 4b b x 3 + (6b b 3 + 4b )x 4 + B 3 b 3 x 3 + 6b b x 4 + B 4 b 4 x 4 + = b B b x = 0. + b 3 4B b b B 3 b 3 x 3 + 3b 4 B (6b b 3 + 4b ) 6B 3 b b B 4 b 4 x 4 + 6

It is worthwhile to notice that b =. So, set the coefficients of x,3,4 all separately to zero and solve: = = b B = 0 b 3 4B b B 3 = 0 3b 4 B (6b 3 + 4b ) 6B 3 b B 4 = 0 B = b B 3 = 4b b 3 B 4 = 3b 4 + 8b b 3 0b 3 Let us calculate b next: b = U (r, r ) d 3 r d 3 r!v = e βu( r r ) d 3 r d 3 r V = V d 3 r } {{ } V e βu( r ) d 3 r = e βu(r) d 3 r. Set r r = r We also should take that a bit further: Since the potential only depends on r = r, we can do the integral over the angle part, giving for B : B = π e βu(r) r dr. Next, for the hard sphere potential, we find: And likewise for the box potential: B = π d 0 B = π d 0 = π 3 d3. r dr + π r dr R d e βa r dr = π 3 d3 + π e βa R 3 d 3 { = πd3 e βa ( ) } 3 R 3 d 7