IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 2 Issue 09 March 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-784X Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis of GORAKHPUR Region Sagar Tripathi Department of Civil Engineering Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur Sana Zafar Department of Civil Engineering Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur Abstract Many earthquakes have been knowledgeable in Indian peninsular shield, which was previously treated to be seismically steady. Seismic risk assessment refers to an evaluation of ground motion parameters at a particular area by considering some past earthquake evidence. In the current study seismic risk assessment is performed for the Gorakhpur city. It is a highly seismic prone area. It comes under zone IV. The manuscript presents the resolve of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and maximum credible earthquake (MCE). MCE has been dogged by taking into account the local seismotectonic movement in a propos 350 km radius about Gorakhpur city. The seismic risk in provisions of peak horizontal acceleration was estimated to be 0.312g using attenuation model by Sharma (2000) and 0.032g using attenuation model by Iyenger and Raghukanth (2004). The calculated peak horizontal acceleration in the nearby reading is in verification with the observed values of Nepal earthquakes and is furthermore similar to standards reported in additional studies. Keywords: Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), Maximum Credible Earthquake (MCE), Seismic hazard I. INTRODUCTION Earthquake is an unexpected sadistic vibration of the earth, naturally causing huge devastation, as a end result of activities within volcanic stroke or the earth's shell. The current district of Gorakhpur stuck between Long. 83º 05' E and 83º 56 E and Lat. 26º 13 N and 27º 29' N. In 1971 it occupied area about 6,301 sq.km and population which was 30, 38,177 (14, 57,587 females). The area occupies the north-eastern place of the state next to the area of Deoria, and comprises a large stretch of country lying to the north of the river Ghaghra. In the zonal map of country (India) the area deceit in zone IV answerable to modest spoil by earthquakes. While till now no foremost earthquake occurred near to it, the zone being not distant from the Himalayan Boundary fault, experiences the special effects of modest to grand earthquakes stirring there. The seismic strength may not go beyond to VIII on the Modified Mercalli scale in 1931. The forests are usually originating in the northern scrap of the regionwhile in the earlier period they comprehensive as far as to the south of area (Gorakhpur) and along the Rapti in south-eastern part of the region. All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 345
Fig. 1: Earthquake affects the study area (GORAKHPUR) [Google] A lot of instruction to be learned which are extremely necessary to preparation of structures and still to diminish such calamities in prospect due to many past earthquakes. The risks connected through earthquakes are called as seismic risks. Work carry out in seismic design & earthquake engg. Involves many things like mitigation of seismic risks and discovery of sources involve in the risk. Basically the damage due to earthquake mainly depends on three factors: - Path characteristics and earthquake source - Neighborhood geological and geotechnical spot conditions - Construction features and structural design Seismic hazard analyses entail the quantitative assessment of ground quaking hazards at a meticulous region. Two type of analysis are done for the estimation of the seismic risks. - Probabilistic Seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 346
- Deterministic Seismic hazard analysis (DSHA) Initial approach taken to seismic risk investigation discovered in nuclear power engineering applications In Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA), is organized for a meticulous earthquake, also realistic or assumed. The Deterministic Seismic Hazard approach uses the identified seismic sources suitably by the accessible historical seismic and geographical data to generate discrete, single-valued events or models of ground motion at the site in general one or more earthquakes are detailed by location and magnitude with admiration to the location. Generally the earthquakes are implicit to happen on the part of the location nearby to the site. The spot ground motions are expected deterministically, given site condition the magnitude and source to-site distance DSHA mainly consist of four steps are as follows (Kramer, 1996). - Identification and characterization of all sources - Selection of source-site distance parameter - Selection of controlling earthquake. - Definition of hazard using controlling earthquake Fig. 2: Four Step DSHA Process [Google] Here we are using two main equations for the finding of the peak ground acceleration (PGA). Following equation is describe as follows. And also we will compare the PGA values getting from these two relation for Gorakhpur region. - Iyenger and Raghukanth (2004) - Sharma (2000) Iyenger and Raghukanth (2004) The peak ground acceleration (PGA) at substratum stage is expected by the attenuation relation of sturdy ground movement projected for Peninsular India ln(y) = C 1 + C 2 (M-6) + C 3 (M-6) 2 C 4 r ln(r) ln(ꜫ) Where r is hypocentral distance, M is magnitude, C 1, C 2, C 3, and C 4 are the constant whose values are written below (C 1 = 1.7236), (C 2 = 0.9453), (C 3 = -0.0740), (C 4 = 0.0064), (ln(ꜫ) = 0.3439) ln(ꜫ) taken as zero 0 because it is very small. Sharma (2000) For the Himalayan region an attenuation connection for peak horizontal ground accelerations in India has been urbanized. Where M is the magnitude, A is the peak ground acceleration (g) and X is the hypocentral space from the source. Using relationship the vertical to horizontal acceleration ratio with admiration to the hypocentral space. Log A h(g) = [-1.072 + 0.3903M - 1.21log 10 ( X + e 0.5873M )] Maximum Credible Earthquake (MCE) The major earthquake that appears competent of taking place under the recognized tectonic construction for a seismic source or detailed fault, as based on geologic and seismologic information. Based on the highest earthquake from deterministic analysis (DSHA). There may be several MCEs for a place, each starting a unlike fault or seismic source. Controlling earthquake the earthquake that is predictable to make the strongest stage of quaking at a location., controlling earthquake is not based on earthquake size. It is based on ground motions. Controlling earthquake can be based on probabilistic or All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 347
deterministic methods. For critical structures, controlling earthquake may same as the MCE from a seismic source or specific fault. For simple structures, controlling earthquake is fewer than the MCE and generally based on probabilistic methods. The first step of computing the peak ground acceleration is gathering of the data like magnitude, epicentral distance, faults etc which is necessary in calculation and then the equation through which PGA can be calculated. So there are some collected data is written in the table which we consider while calculation of PGA for the GORAKHPUR region. And the two equations which are used to find PGA and then compare their values are already discussed above. Fig. 3: relation in epicenter and depth [Google] Table - 1 Fault Detail around Gorakhpur Sr. no. Faults Name Magnitude (M) Epicentre 1. Slip along Main Frontal Thrust 5.7 281.2 2. Slip along Main Frontal Thrust 6.3 292.2 3. Slip along Main Frontal Thrust 6.7 283.2 4. Main Frontal Thrust 7.8 202.2 5. Main Frontal Thrust 5.5 380.2 6. Himalayan frontal thrust 5.5 399.2 7. Main Frontal Thrust 5.5 354.2 8. Main Frontal Thrust 5.6 373.2 9. Himalayan frontal thrust 5.5 325.2 10. Main Frontal Thrust 6.8 323.0 11. Main Frontal Thrust 5.6 306.2 12. Main Frontal Thrust 5.6 346.2 13. Strike Slip Motion on Sleep Fault 6.6 386.2 14. Main Frontal Thrust 5.7 291.2 Table:-2 Major Earthquake around Study Area GORAKHPUR Sr. no. Date Latitude ( 0 N) Longitude ( 0 S) Magnitude Depth (Km) 1 16/05/2015 27.546 86.075 5.7 10 2 12/05/2015 27.618 86.166 6.3 15 3 26/04/2015 27.782 85.997 6.7 17 4 25/04/2015 28.147 84.708 7.8 15 5 26/02/2010 28.436 86.726 5.5 35 6 07/11/2007 29.49 86.008 5.5 5 7 27/11/2001 29.606 81.752 5.5 33 8 03/09/1998 27.86 86.941 5.6 33 9 03/11/1997 29.078 85.383 5.5 33 10 27/08/1988 26.755 86.616 6.8 57 11 09/08/1987 29.502 83.717 5.6 47 12 18/05/1984 29.577 81.869 5.6 33 13 29/07/1980 29.598 81.092 6.6 18 14 24/03/1947 27.727 86.11 5.7 33 Table - 3 Calculated PGA Values Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) Sr. No. Magnitude (M) Hypocentral Distance (R) Sharma (2000) Iyenger and Raghukanth (2004) 1 5.7 281.37 0.0458 0.0024 2 6.3 292.58 0.0731 0.0038 3 6.7 283.70 0.1042 0.0060 4 7.8 202.75 0.3123 0.0325 5 5.5 381.80 0.0291 0.0007 6 5.5 399.23 0.0279 0.0006 All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 348
7 5.5 355.73 0.0311 0.0009 8 5.6 374.65 0.0323 0.0009 9 5.5 326.87 0.0337 0.0012 10 6.8 327.99 0.0999 0.0042 11 5.6 309.78 0.0385 0.0016 12 5.6 347.76 0.0346 0.0011 13 6.6 386.61 0.0733 0.0020 14 5.7 293.06 0.0442 0.0021 Max of PGA 0.3123g 0.0325g II. CONCLUSION In the current study, peak ground accelerations (PGA) at rock level have been estimated for the Gorakhpur region covering Long. 83º 05' E and 83º 56 E and Lat. 26º 13 N and 27º 29' N. In 2016 using state of the art deterministic seismic hazard analysis. The PGA calculated shows that the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) is capable of producing peak horizontalacceleration (Ah) of 0.3123 g using attenuation relationships by Sharma (2000) and peak horizontal acceleration (Ah) of 0.0324 g using attenuation relationships by Iyenger and Raghukanth (2004). Maximum Credible Earthquake for the Gorakhpur region is 7.8 at which maximum value of peak ground acceleration is calculated. Peak horizontal acceleration is destructive in nature and the mainly destruction of building depends on the duration of earthquake. The earthquake data of entire Gorakhpur and its neighboring area has been organized which will be helpful for lots of seismic studies in the area. The outcome developed in this cram is preface in nature however certainly provides the several bases in the plan of new services and defensive accessible structures. III. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Authors would honestly like to thank eveyone from all across India for their co-operation and kind help and to be part of this project. This work has been carried out in civil engineering department of madan mohan malviya university of technology, Gorakhpur. REFERENCE Journal manuscript [1] Kramer. S. L.: 1996, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Published by Pearson Education Pte Ltd. [2] Wang, Z.: 2005, Discussion on problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants, Eng. Geol. 78, 285 307; Eng. Geol. 82, 86 88 [3] Krinitzsky, E.: 2005, Discussion on problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants, Eng. Geol. 78, 285 307; Eng. Geol. 82, 66 68. [4] Mithilesh Kumar, H. R. Wason and Ranjit Das Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment Of Dehradun City Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference Dec.22-24,2013, Roorkee [5] T. G. Sitharam* and p. Anbazhagan, seismic hazard analysis for the banglore region (2007) natural hazards (2007) 40: 261 278 [6] Iyengar, R. N. and Raghukanth, S. T. G.: 2004, Attenuation of strong ground motion in peninsular India, Seismol. Res. Lett. 75(4), 530 540. [7] K. S. Rao, T. P. Thaker, A. Aggarawal, T. Bhandari and S. Kabra DETERMINISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF ahemdabad region Gujarat international journal of earth science and engineering April 2012, P.P.206-213 [8] BIS-1893 (2002). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 General provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India [9] Ganapathy.G.P A deterministic seismic hazard analysis for the major c ultural heritagesites of Tamil Nadu, India International journal of geomantic and geosciences vol. 1, no3, 2010 [10] A.G. HULL &A. Augello and R.S. Yeats deterministic seismic hazard analysis of northwest Orgon, U.S.A. 2003 pacific conference on earthquake engineering [11] Muhammad Waseem1, Muhammad Asif Khan1, Muhammad Waqas Javed1 and Syed Mohammad Ali2 deterministic seismic hazard analysis for Peshawar, Pakistan Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences 46(1) (2013)67-72 [12] NEELIMA SATYAM. D and K. S. RAO, Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique International Journal of Earth Sciences and Enginee ring ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 02, No. 03, pp. 215-223, July 2009 [13] BIS-1893 (2002). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 General provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. [14] Biswas, S.K. (1987). Regional Tectonic Framework, Structure and Evolution of the Western Marginal Basins of India, Tectonophysics, 135, 307-327. [15] Biswas, S. K. (1999). A Review on the Evolution of Rift Basins in India During Gondwana with Special Reference to Western Indian Basins and Their Hydrocarbon Prospects, PINSA 65 (3) 261-283. [16] Chandra, U. (1977). Earthquakes of PI- A Seismotectonic Study, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 67(5), 1387 1413. [17] Mark, R. K.: 1977, Application of linear statistical model of earthquake magnitude versus fault length in estimating maximum expectable earthquakes, Geology 5, 464 466. [18] Project Vasundhara: 1994, Geo scientific Analysis, Database creation and Development of GIS for parts of south Indian Peninsular Shield. ISSN O254 0436. [19] O Leary, D. W., Driedman, J. D. and Pohn, H. A.: 1976, Lineaments, linear, lineation: Some proposed new standards for old terms, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 87, 1463 1469. [20] Radhakrishnan, B. P. and Vaidyanathan, R.: 1997, Geology of Karnataka, Geological Society of India, Bangalore. Ramalingeswara Rao, B. and Sitapathi Rao, P.: 1984, Historical seismicity of peninsular India, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 2519 2533. [21] Rao, R., Seshamma, C. V. and Mandal, P.: 1998, Estimation of Coda Qc and spectral characteristics of some moderate earthquakes of southern Indian peninsula, Unpublished Report. [22] GSI. (2000), Seismotectonic Atlas of India and Its Environs, Geological Survey of india. All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 349
[23] IS-1893 (Part1): 2002, Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Fifth Revision. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi. [24] Kumar, P. (2009), Seismic Hazard Assessment of Uttarakhand, M.Tech dissertation, Department of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee. [25] Lang, D. H., Singh, Y., Prasad J. S. R. (2012), Comparing Empirical and Analytical Estimates of Earthquake Loss Assessment for the City of Dehradun, India, Earthquake Spectra, 28(2), 595 619. [26] Mark, R.K. (1977), Application of Linear Statistical Models of Earthquake Magnitude Versus Fault Length in Estimating Maximum expectable Earthquakes, Geology 5, 464-466. [27] Martin, S. and Szeliga, W. (2010), A Catalog of Felt Intensity Data for 570 Earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(2), 562-569. [28] Reiter, L. (1990), Earthquake Hazard Analysis, Columbia University Press, New York, 254. [29] Sharma, M. L. (2000), Attenuation Relationship for Estimation of Peak Ground Vertical Acceleration Using Data from Strong Motion Arrays in India, Proceedings of Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1964. 15 All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 350