Radiation Heat Transfer Experiment

Similar documents
Fin Convection Experiment

Fin Convection Experiment

Convection Heat Transfer Experiment

Introduction to Heat Transfer Analysis

Radiation Heat Transfer. Introduction. Blackbody Radiation. Definitions ,

Reading Problems , 15-33, 15-49, 15-50, 15-77, 15-79, 15-86, ,

ME 476 Solar Energy UNIT TWO THERMAL RADIATION

Thermal Network Analysis with TNSolver

Radiation Heat Transfer. Introduction. Blackbody Radiation

Lumped Mass Heat Transfer Experiment

Figure 1. Experimental apparatus

PROBLEM (a) Long duct (L): By inspection, F12. By reciprocity, (b) Small sphere, A 1, under concentric hemisphere, A 2, where A 2 = 2A

PROBLEM (a) Long duct (L): By inspection, F12. By reciprocity, (b) Small sphere, A 1, under concentric hemisphere, A 2, where A 2 = 2A

Introduction to Heat Transfer

11. Advanced Radiation

Heriot-Watt University

SOLUTIONS. Question 6-12:

PROBLEM L. (3) Noting that since the aperture emits diffusely, I e = E/π (see Eq ), and hence

b( ) ) ( ) PROBLEM = W / m = 1991 W / m. = W / m 4 m = 3164 W.

UNIT FOUR SOLAR COLLECTORS

Simplified Collector Performance Model

G α Absorbed irradiation

The Planck Distribution. The Planck law describes theoretical spectral distribution for the emissive power of a black body. It can be written as

To remain at 0 K heat absorbed by the medium must be removed in the amount of. dq dx = q(l) q(0) dx. Q = [1 2E 3 (τ L )] σ(t T 4 2 ).

Thermal Systems Design MARYLAND. Fundamentals of heat transfer Radiative equilibrium Surface properties Non-ideal effects

PROBLEM cos 30. With A 1 = A 2 = A 3 = A 4 = 10-3 m 2 and the incident radiation rates q 1-j from the results of Example 12.

Heat Transfer Analysis of a Between-Panes Venetian Blind Using Effective Longwave Radiative Properties

Thermal Radiation By: Prof. K M Joshi

Thermal Systems Design

ECE309 INTRODUCTION TO THERMODYNAMICS & HEAT TRANSFER. 10 August 2005

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Notes on Heat Transfer in a Layered Longeron

Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div.4 8:30 am 9:30 pm 12:30 pm 3:30 pm Han Xu Ruan Pan

Indo-German Winter Academy

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI

Radiative heat transfer

innova-ve entrepreneurial global 1

Surrounding Effects on Temperature and Emissivity Measurement of Equipment in Electrical Distribution System

Greenhouse Steady State Energy Balance Model

Autumn 2005 THERMODYNAMICS. Time: 3 Hours

Chapter 11 FUNDAMENTALS OF THERMAL RADIATION

Absorptivity, Reflectivity, and Transmissivity

TFAWS 2005 Short Course

TRANSMISSION OF HEAT

Paper No. : 04 Paper Title: Unit Operations in Food Processing Module-07: Heat Transfer 3: Heat Radiation

Thermal Systems Design MARYLAND. Fundamentals of heat transfer Radiative equilibrium Surface properties Non-ideal effects

True/False. Circle the correct answer. (1pt each, 7pts total) 3. Radiation doesn t occur in materials that are transparent such as gases.

= (fundamental constants c 0, h, k ). (1) k

Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer

Research Article Study on Effect of Number of Transparent Covers and Refractive Index on Performance of Solar Water Heater

RADIATIVE VIEW FACTORS

Lecture 2: principles of electromagnetic radiation

MARYLAND. Fundamentals of heat transfer Radiative equilibrium Surface properties Non-ideal effects. Conduction Thermal system components

Computational analysis of the heat gain of buildings through their roofs using a heat transfer transient nonlinear model solved by numerical methods

INSTRUCTOR: PM DR MAZLAN ABDUL WAHID

Heat and Mass Transfer Unit-1 Conduction

Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach - Yunus A Cengel Assignment 11 Fall 2003 Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Chapter 11, Problem 49

Research Article Emissivity Measurement of Semitransparent Textiles

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF REFLECTIVE COATINGS ON ROOFTOP UNITS

Interaction of light and matter

QUESTION ANSWER. . e. Fourier number:

Emissivity: Understanding the difference between apparent and actual infrared temperatures

Improvement of computational time in radiative heat transfer of three-dimensional participating media using the radiation element method

DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION OF A SOLAR CONICAL CONCENTRATING COLLECTOR AND ESTIMATION OE ITS PERFORMANCE. Morka J.C

INTRODUCTION Radiation differs from conduction and convection in that it does not require the presence of a material medium to take place.

The 5 th TSME International Conference on Mechanical Engineering th December 2014, The Empress, Chiang Mai

CAE 331/513 Building Science Fall 2016

Design and Prototyping of a Passive Cold Chain Vaccine Storage Device for Long Hold Times

AR/IA 241 LN 231 Lecture 4: Fundamental of Energy

If there is convective heat transfer from outer surface to fluid maintained at T W.

Blackbody radiation. Main Laws. Brightness temperature. 1. Concepts of a blackbody and thermodynamical equilibrium.

Effect of Selective Coatings on Solar Absorber for Parabolic Dish Collector

C ONTENTS CHAPTER TWO HEAT CONDUCTION EQUATION 61 CHAPTER ONE BASICS OF HEAT TRANSFER 1 CHAPTER THREE STEADY HEAT CONDUCTION 127

1. Radiative Transfer. 2. Spectrum of Radiation. 3. Definitions

Optimization of Thermal Radiation Source for High Temperature Infrared Thermometer Calibration

Burner Tubing Specification for the Turbulent Ethylene Non-Premixed Jet Flame

A Radiation Model of a Rapid Thermal Processing System

Teaching Energy Balance using Round Numbers: A Quantitative Approach to the Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming

Advanced Heat and Mass Transfer by Amir Faghri, Yuwen Zhang, and John R. Howell

( ) PROBLEM C 10 C 1 L m 1 50 C m K W. , the inner surface temperature is. 30 W m K

Heat Transfer: Physical Origins and Rate Equations. Chapter One Sections 1.1 and 1.2

Eng Heat Transfer I 1

If light travels past a system faster than the time scale for which the system evolves then t I ν = 0 and we have then

OPTIMIZATION of the GEOMETRY & MATERIAL of SOLAR WATER HEATERS.

Furnaces. 3.2 Hot gases as heat source

Calculation of the Effective Emissivities of Speculardiffuse Cavities by the Monte Carlo Method

EXPERIMENT NO. 4. Thermal Radiation: the Stefan-Boltzmann Law

Outline. Today we will learn what is thermal radiation

On Numerical Methods for Radiative Heat Transfer. by Professor Bengt Sundén, Department of Energy Sciences, Lund University

Computational Modeling of a Solar Thermoelectric Generator

SIMULATED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF TRIPLE VACUUM GLAZING. Yueping Fang, Trevor J. Hyde, Neil Hewitt

HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER. List of Experiments:

Numerical Study of Convective Heat Transfer for Flat Unglazed Transpired Solar Collectors

Appendix E. Development of a thermal control system for South Africa s next generation Earth observation satellite

Numerical Analysis of Comfort and Energy Performance of Radiant Heat Emission Systems

2. Illustration of Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect with Simple Models

aka Light Properties of Light are simultaneously

S.E. (Chemical) (Second Semester) EXAMINATION, 2011 HEAT TRANSFER (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

Chapter 13 The Transfer of Heat

The Planck Blackbody Equation and Atmospheric Radiative Transfer

Transcription:

Radiation Heat Transfer Experiment Thermal Network Solution with TNSolver Bob Cochran Applied Computational Heat Transfer Seattle, WA rjc@heattransfer.org ME 331 Introduction to Heat Transfer University of Washington November 18, 2014

2 / 43 Outline Math Model Geometry Test Data Thermal Network Model Solution with TNSolver Results

3 / 43 Surface Properties for Radiation Heat Transfer Math Model All surfaces emit thermal radiation. The emittance, ɛ, is the ratio of actual energy emitted to that of a black surface at the same temperature. All radiation impinging on a surface will either be reflected, absorbed or transmitted. Reflectance or reflectivity, ρ, is the amount reflected. Absorptance or absorptivity, α, is the amount absorbed. Transmittance or transmissivity, τ, is the amount transmitted through the material.

4 / 43 Surface Properties for Radiation Heat Transfer (continued) Math Model Summation property for all incident radiation: ρ + α + τ = 1 An opaque surface has τ = 0, so ρ + α = 0. Kirchoff s law provides that ɛ = α for gray, diffuse surfaces. Diffuse is a modifier which means the property is not a function of direction. Gray is a modifier indicating no dependence on wavelength. Spectral is a modifier which means dependence on wavelength. Specular is a modifier which means mirror-like reflection.

Characteristics of Real Surfaces Math Model Figure borrowed from M.F. Modest, Radiative Heat Transfer, second edition, Academic Press, New York, 2003 5 / 43

6 / 43 View Factor Properties Math Model Summation Rule (Equation (13.4), page 830 in [BLID11]): N F ij = 1 i=1 Reciprocity Rule (Equation (13.3), page 829 in [BLID11]): A i F ij = A j F ji Addition of View Factors for Subdivided Surfaces (Equation (13.5), page 833 and Figure 13.7, page 835 in [BLID11]): F i(j) = N k=1 F ik

7 / 43 View Factor for Coaxial Parallel Disks Math Model A j R i = r i L, R j = r j L r j S = 1 + 1 + R2 j R 2 i L F ij = 1 2 S S 2 4 ( rj r i ) 2 A i r i See Table 13.2, page 833 in [BLID11] or Table 10.3, page 546 in [LL12] Also see the web site: A Catalog of Radiation Heat Transfer Configuration Factors, by John R. Howell, specifically C-41: Disk to parallel coaxial disk of unequal radius.

8 / 43 View Factor for Conical Frustum Wall to its Base Math Model r t H = h r b R = r b r t X = 1 + R 2 + H 2 F wb = 2R2 X + X 2 4R 2 2 (1 + R) X 2R A w A b r b h See the web site: A Catalog of Radiation Heat Transfer Configuration Factors, by John R. Howell, specifically C-112: Interior of frustum of right circular cone to base.

9 / 43 View Factor for Disk to Coaxial Cone Math Model α = tan 1 r c h S = r d R = r c X = S + R cot α L r d A = X 2 + (1 + R) 2 B = X 2 + (1 R) 2 C = cos α + S sin α D = cos α S sin α E = R cot α S See the web site: A Catalog of Radiation Heat Transfer Configuration Factors, by John R. Howell, specifically C-48: Disk to coaxial cone. A c A d r d α r c L h

10 / 43 View Factor for Disk to Coaxial Cone (continued) Math Model For α tan 1 1 S : F dc = 1 2 For α < tan 1 1 S : F dc = 1 π + sin α cos 2 α { } R 2 + X 2 + 1 (1 + R 2 + X 2 ) 2 4R 2 { 1 AC ABtan [ 1 CD XEtan X (1 BD + + S 2) tan 1 C D ( + S2 1 CD tan S + (CD)2 tan 1 X CD S )] tan 1 CD [ ] } R (X + S) + SR tan α cos 1 ( S tan α) sin 2α

11 / 43 Net Radiation Method for Enclosures The enclosure geometry is approximated by a set of N ideal surfaces Diffuse gray emission/absorption Diffuse gray reflections Each surface is isothermal, with uniform heat flux 3 2 4 5 1 6

12 / 43 Oppenheim Network for Three Surfaces Math Model 3 1 ɛ 3 ɛ 3A 3 J 3 1 A 2F 23 J 2 1 ɛ 2 ɛ 2A 2 2 e b3 e b2 1 1 A 1F 13 A 1F 12 J 1 1 ɛ 1 ɛ 1A 1 e b1 1 A.K. Oppenheim, Radiation Analysis by the Network Method, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 78, pp. 725 735, 1956

13 / 43 The Surface Radiosity Math Model Radiosity, J i, for surface i is: Surface irradiation, G i is: J i = ɛ i σti 4 }{{} + ρ i G }{{} i emmision reflected irradiation G i = N F ij J j i=1 Then noting that ρ i = 1 ɛ i, the equation for the radiosity from surface i is: ( N ) J i (1 ɛ i ) F ij J j i=1 = ɛ i σt 4 i

System of Equations for the Radiosity Math Model Rearrangement of the radiosity equation for surface i leads to: N i=1 [ δij (1 ɛ i ) F ij ] Jj = ɛ i σt 4 i Combining the radiosity equations for each surface in the enclosure leads to a system of equations: Where: [A] {J} = {b} A ij = δ ij (1 ɛ i ) F ij b i = ɛ i σt 4 i The surface temperature, T i, is provided by the solution of the energy conservation equation. 14 / 43

15 / 43 Application of Radiosity to Heat Conduction Equation Math Model Once the radiosity, J i is known for a surface, the irradiation is evaluated: G i = N F ij J j i=1 This is then used to evaluate the net radiant thermal energy for surface i: q i radiation = ɛ i σt 4 i α i G i This heat flux boundary condition is then applied to the energy conservation equation solution so that updated surface temperatures can be determined. Iteration between the energy equation and the radiosity is continued until convergence.

16 / 43 Matrix Form of the Radiosity Equation Math Model where, for N = 3: J 1 {J} = J 2 J 3 [ɛ] = [ρ] = N i=1 ɛ 1 0 0 0 ɛ 2 0 0 0 ɛ 3 [ δij (1 ɛ i ) F ij ] Jj = ɛ i σt 4 i ([I] [ρ][f ]) {J} = [ɛ] {E b } ρ 1 0 0 0 ρ 2 0 0 0 ρ 3 { σt 4} = [F] = σt 4 1 σt 4 2 σt 4 3 F 11 F 12 F 13 F 21 F 22 F 23 F 31 F 32 F 33 = [I] [ɛ] = = {E b} = [I] = E b1 E b2 E b3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 ɛ 1 0 0 0 1 ɛ 2 0 0 0 1 ɛ 3

17 / 43 Enclosure Heat Flow from Radiosity Math Model ([I] [ρ][f]){j} = [ɛ]{e b } Using the definition of radiosity: {J} = [ɛ]{e b } + [ρ]{g} = [ɛ]{e b } + [ρ][f]{j} and the net surface heat flux (α = ɛ): {q} = [ɛ]{e b } [α]{g} = [ɛ]{e b } [ɛ][f]{j} then some algebraic manipulation leads to: ([I] [F][ρ])[ɛ] 1 {q} = ([I] [F]){E b } or, {q} = [ɛ]([i] [F][ρ]) 1 ([I] [F]){E b }

18 / 43 Exchange Factor, F Math Model The exchange factor concept is based on proposing that there is a parameter, F ij, based on surface properties and enclosure geometry, that determines the radiative heat exchange between two surfaces [Hot54, HS67] : Q ij = A i F ij σ(t 4 i T 4 j ) F is known by many names in the literature: script-f, gray body configuration factor, transfer factor and Hottel called it the over-all interchange factor. For an enclosure with N surfaces, the net heat flow rate, Q i, for surface i, is: Q i = N j=1 ( ) A i F ij σti 4 σtj 4 = N ( ) A i F ij Ebi E bj j=1

19 / 43 Exchange Factor, F, Properties Math Model Reciprocity: A i F ij = A j F ji Summation: N F ij = ɛ i j=1

20 / 43 Matrix Form of Enclosure Radiation with F Math Model where, for N = 3: [F ] = Q i = N ( ) A i F ij Ebi E bj j=1 {Q} = [A] ([ɛ] [F ]) {E b } {q} = [A] 1 {Q} = ([ɛ] [F ]) {E b } {Q} = Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 F 11 F 12 F 13 F 21 F 22 F 23 F 31 F 32 F 33 [A] = {E b } = A 1 0 0 0 A 2 0 0 0 A 3 σt 4 1 σt 4 2 σt 4 3 [ɛ] = ɛ 1 0 0 0 ɛ 2 0 0 0 ɛ 3

21 / 43 Exchange Factors, F, from View Factors, F Math Model The net heat flux using view factors, F ij, is: {q} = [ɛ]([i] [F][ρ]) 1 ([I] [F]){E b } The net heat flux using exchange factors, F ij, is: {q} = ([ɛ] [F ]) {E b } The two enclosure heat fluxes are equal, so equating gives: ([ɛ] [F ]) {E b } = [ɛ]([i] [F][ρ]) 1 ([I] [F]){E b } ([ɛ] [F ]) = [ɛ]([i] [F][ρ]) 1 ([I] [F]) ( ) [F ] = [ɛ] [I] ([I] [F][ρ]) 1 ([I] [F])

Radiation Heat Transfer Experiment Geometry 22 / 43

Heater Geometry 23 / 43

Shield Geometry 24 / 43

Target Geometry 25 / 43

26 / 43 Surface Emissivity Material Properties Geometry Emissivity properties from Table A.8 in [BLID11] Material ɛ Target: Alloy 1100 Aluminum, coated flat black 0.95 Target: 304 Stainless Steel 0.2 0.28 Heater: Ceran glass 0.8* Shield: Galvanized steel 0.28 * To be confirmed See [TD70] and [Gil02] for emissivity data, for a variety of materials.

27 / 43 Measurements Test Data For each target material: Heater temperature Water evaporation rate Ambient air temperature Distance from target to heater Shield in place or not

28 / 43 Sample Data Set Test Data Aluminum, Painted Flat Black, 4 Above The Heater Heater Temperature was 525 C Water Temperature was 100 C

29 / 43 Heat Transfer Analysis Thermal Network Model Energy conservation: control volumes Identify and sketch out the control volumes Use the conductor analogy to represent energy transfer between the control volumes and energy generation or storage Conduction, convection, radiation, other? Capacitance Sources or sinks State assumptions and determine appropriate parameters for each conductor Geometry, material properties, etc. Which conductor(s)/source(s)/capacitance(s) are important to the required results? Sensitivity analysis What is missing from the model? - peer/expert review

30 / 43 Thermal Network Terminology Thermal Network Model Geometry Control Volume Volume property, V = dv V Node:, T node = T (x V i)dv Control Volume Surface Area property, A = da A Surface Node:, T surface node = T (x A i)da Material properties Conductors Conduction, convection, radiation Boundary conditions Boundary node:

31 / 43 Network Model Thermal Network Model water t-w env t-s target t-e s-e shield h-s h-t h-e env heater

32 / 43 Radiation Conductors Thermal Network Model Q ij = σf ij A i (T 4 i T 4 j ) Begin Conductors! label type nd_i nd_j script-f A h-t radiation heater target 0.0113 0.0613 h-s radiation heater shield 0.1711 0.0613 h-e radiation heater env 0.3076 0.0613 t-s radiation target shield 0.0042 0.0248 t-e radiation target env 0.0651 0.0248 s-e radiation shield env 0.0648 0.0516 End Conductors Note that h r is reported in the output file.

33 / 43 Linearization of Radiation Conductors Thermal Network Model The temperature is linearized using a two term Taylor series expansion about the previous iteration temperature, T : T 4 j T 4 i (T i ) 4 + (T i T i ) 4(T i ) 3 Ti 4 4(Ti ) 3 T i 3(T ( ) 4 ( ) ( Tj + T j Tj 4 ( ) 3Tj Tj 4 4 Tj 3( Tj i ) 4 The linearized form of the heat transfer rate is: [ ( ) 3Tj Q ij = σf ij A i 4(Ti ) 3 T i 3(Ti ) 4 4 Tj + 3( { ( Q ij = σf ij A i 4(Ti ) 3 T i 4 T j T j ) 4 ) 3 T j ) 4 ] ) { 3Tj ( } σf ij A i 3(Ti ) 4 3 T j ) 4 }

34 / 43 Using the Function disk2disk.m Thermal Network Model >> help disk2disk [F12, A1, F21, A2] = disk2disk(r1, r2, h) Description: View factor between two coaxial disks. Inputs: r1 = radius of upper disk r2 = radius of lower disk h = distance between the disks Outputs: F12 = view factor from upper disk to lower disk A1 = area of the upper disk F21 = viewfactor from lower disk to upper disk A2 = area of the lower disk Reference: A Catalog of Radiation Heat Transfer Configuration Factors, third edition, John R. Howell, The University of Texas at Austin http://www.thermalradiation.net/sectionc/c-41.html

35 / 43 Using the Function disk2disk.m Thermal Network Model r 1 = 0.0889m, r 2 = 0.0889m and h = 0.2m >>[F12, A1, F21, A2] = disk2disk(0.0889, 0.0889, 0.2) F12 = 0.1446 A1 = 0.0248 F21 = 0.1446 A2 = 0.0248

36 / 43 Using the Function cone2base.m Thermal Network Model >> help cone2base [F12, A1, F21, A2] = cone2base(rb, rt, h) Description: View factor between the interior wall of a conical frustum and its base. Inputs: rb = radius of base rt = radius of top of conical frustum h = height of the conical frustrum Outputs: F12 = view factor from interior wall to base A1 = area of the interior wall F21 = viewfactor from base to interior wall A2 = area of the base Reference: A Catalog of Radiation Heat Transfer Configuration Factors, third edition, John R. Howell, The University of Texas at Austin http://www.thermalradiation.net/sectionc/c-111.html

37 / 43 Using the Function cone2base.m Thermal Network Model r b = 0.1397m, r t = 0.0889m and h = 0.0508m >> [F12, A1, F21, A2]=cone2base(0.1397,0.0889,0.0508) F12 = 0.7872 A1 = 0.0516 F21 = 0.6624 A2 = 0.0613

38 / 43 View Factor Matrix, [F] Thermal Network Model A (m 2 ) heater 0.0670 target 0.0248 shield 0.0564 env 0.1 A good rule of thumb when setting the area for radiation to the surroundings, is to make it about the same order of magnitude as the enclosure area. heater target shield env heater 0 0.1077 0.6851 0.2072 target 0.2907 0 0.0965 0.6127 shield 0.8134 0.0425 0 0.1441 env 0.1388 0.1521 0.0813 0.6277

39 / 43 Using the Function scriptf.m Thermal Network Model >>help scriptf [sf] = scriptf(emiss, F) Description: Evaluate the "script-f" or transfer factors for an enclosure radiation problem, given the geometric view factors and surface emissivities. Input: emiss(:) = vector of surface emissivities - length(emiss) = number of enclosure surfaces F(:,:) = geometric view factor matrix - can be a full or sparse matrix Output: sf(:,:) = script-f matrix - if F is sparse, then sf will be sparse

40 / 43 Using the Function scriptf.m Thermal Network Model >>emiss = [0.8, 0.1, 0.28, 1.0]; >>F = [ 0, 0.1077, 0.6851, 0.2072; 0.2907, 0, 0.0965, 0.6127; 0.8134, 0.0425, 0, 0.1441; 0.1388, 0.1521, 0.0813, 0.6277 ] >>[sf] = scriptf(emiss, F);

41 / 43 Exchange Factor Matrix, [F ] Thermal Network Model ɛ heater 0.8 target 0.1 shield 0.28 env 1.0 heater target shield env heater 0.3100 0.0113 0.1711 0.3076 target 0.0306 0.0001 0.0042 0.0651 shield 0.2031 0.0018 0.0102 0.0648 env 0.2061 0.0162 0.0366 0.7411

42 / 43 Thermal Network Solution Results env 25 (C) s-e 56.7969 (W) t-e 1.0637 (W) water 100 (C) shield 471.4944 (C) h-e 425.458 (W) t-w 15.8103 (W) t-s -1.7007 (W) target 100.6375 (C) h-s 58.4975 (W) h-t 15.1733 (W) heater 525 (C)

43 / 43 Conclusion Provided view factor formulations required for the experiment Derived the relationship between the exchange factor, F, and the Oppenheim network Developed the thermal network model of the radiation heat transfer experiment Demonstrated simulation results for preliminary experimental data Questions?

44 / 43 References I [BLID11] T.L. Bergman, A.S. Lavine, F.P. Incropera, and D.P. DeWitt. Introduction to Heat Transfer. John Wiley & Sons, New York, sixth edition, 2011. [Gil02] [Hot54] David G. Gilmore, editor. Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook, Volume I: Fundamental Technologies. The Aerospace Press, El Segundo, California, second edition, 2002. H. C. Hottel. Radiant-heat transmission. In Heat Transmission [McA54], chapter 4, pages 55 125.

45 / 43 References II [HS67] H. C. Hottel and A. F. Sarofim. Radiative Transfer. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967. [LL12] J. H. Lienhard, IV and J. H. Lienhard, V. A Heat Transfer Textbook. Phlogiston Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, fourth edition, 2012. Available at: http://ahtt.mit.edu. [McA54] W. H. McAdams. Heat Transmission. McGraw-Hill, New York, third edition, 1954.

46 / 43 References III [TD70] Y. S. Touloukian and D. P. DeWitt. Thermal Radiative Properties: Metallic Elements and Alloys, volume 7 of Thermophysical Properties of Matter. IFI/Plenum, New York, 1970. Engineering Library, Reference, Floor 1, QC171.P83.