Classification of offshore structures

Similar documents
WAMIT-MOSES Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study. JRME, July 2000

OTG-13. Prediction of air gap for column stabilised units. Won Ho Lee 01 February Ungraded. 01 February 2017 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Effect of Tethers Tension Force in the Behavior of a Tension Leg Platform Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force Amr R. El-Gamal, Ashraf Essa, Ayman Ismail

Seakeeping Models in the Frequency Domain

INFLUENCE OF TETHER LENGTH IN THE RESPONSE BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TENSION LEG PLATFORM IN REGULAR WAVES

Structural Dynamics Lecture 2. Outline of Lecture 2. Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.)

OFFSHORE HYDROMECHANICS OE 4620-d

Structural Dynamics of Offshore Wind Turbines subject to Extreme Wave Loading

DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE TENSION LEG PLATFORMS UNDER HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES

Hull-tether-riser dynamics of deep water tension leg platforms

TRUNCATED MODEL TESTS FOR MOORING LINES OF A SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE PLATFORM AND ITS EQUIVALENT COMPENSATED METHOD

A Preliminary Analysis on the Statistics of about One-Year Air Gap Measurement for a Semi-submersible in South China Sea

Oscillatory Motion and Wave Motion

Effect of Tethers Tension Force on the Behavior of Triangular Tension Leg Platform

VIOLENT WAVE TRAPPING - SOME RESULTS ON WATER PROJECTION AROUND SEMI-SUBs AND TLPs

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HYDRODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF A NEW TYPE OF DEEP DRAFT MULTI-COLUMN FDPSO

THEORY OF VIBRATION ISOLATION

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS BASICS:

Structural Dynamics Lecture 7. Outline of Lecture 7. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.) System Reduction. Vibration due to Movable Supports.

THE NATURE OF THE DRAUPNER GIANT WAVE OF 1 ST JAN 1995 AND THE ASSOCIATED SEA-STATE AND

ANALYSIS OF THE AXIAL BEHAVIOR OF A DRILLING RISER WITH A SUSPENDED MASS

Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Analysis

Response of square tension leg platforms to hydrodynamic forces

Proceedings of the ASME nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2013 June 9-14, 2013, Nantes, France

Analytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures

Coupled Heave-Pitch Motions and Froude Krylov Excitation Forces

NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF A SINGLE- POINT MOORING SYSTEM FOR FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE STANDING HYBRID RISERS. A Thesis TIANCONG HOU

Chapter 14 Oscillations

PHYSICS. Chapter 15 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Dynamics of Offshore Structures

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 2, February ISSN

Prediction of Wave and Wind induced Dynamic Response in Time Domain using RM Bridge

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

NTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology TMR 4195 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

Overview of BV R&D activities in Marine Hydrodynamics

Dynamic response and fluid structure interaction of submerged floating tunnels

( ) Chapter 3: Free Vibration of the Breakwater. 3.1 Introduction

DREDGING DYNAMICS AND VIBRATION MEASURES

Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Prof. A.H. Techet Fall 2004

Physics 207 Lecture 25. Lecture 25. HW11, Due Tuesday, May 6 th For Thursday, read through all of Chapter 18. Angular Momentum Exercise

Experimental determination of hydrodynamic coefficients

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS

42 Submerged Body in Waves

The Performance of Heaving Bodies

A Level. A Level Physics. Oscillations (Answers) AQA, Edexcel. Name: Total Marks: /30

RamSeries - Validation Case 42

13.42 LECTURE 13: FLUID FORCES ON BODIES. Using a two dimensional cylinder within a two-dimensional flow we can demonstrate some of the principles

Dynamic Responses of Jacket Type Offshore Wind Turbines using Decoupled and Coupled Models

Renewable Energy: Ocean Wave-Energy Conversion

FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MASTER'S THESIS. Open. Author: Thorgeir Anundsen (signature author)

SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE TOPSIDE

Final Exam April 30, 2013

Dynamics and Control of the GyroPTO Wave Energy Point Absorber under Sea Waves

Engineering Science OUTCOME 2 - TUTORIAL 3 FREE VIBRATIONS

/01/04: Morrison s Equation SPRING 2004 A. H. TECHET

PC 1141 : AY 2012 /13

Analysis of the DeepCwind model tests and a first attempt to simulate a semi-submersible floating wind platform with anysim

Student name: This is a closed book examination. You are allowed 1 sheet of 8.5 x 11 paper with notes.

SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy

Damped & forced oscillators

Phase-Amplitude Conversion, Cafe Door, Pet Door, Damping Classifications

A Probabilistic Design Approach for Riser Collision based on Time- Domain Response Analysis

Mechanics IV: Oscillations

Study on Motions of a Floating Body under Composite External Loads

The... of a particle is defined as its change in position in some time interval.

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

MASTER S THESIS. Faculty of Science and Technology. Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, Constructions and Materials

Chapter a. Spring constant, k : The change in the force per unit length change of the spring. b. Coefficient of subgrade reaction, k:

v t + fu = 1 p y w t = 1 p z g u x + v y + w

Oscillatory Motion SHM

Investigation of Drill Bit Heave Response to Drill Rig Heave Excitation

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF DAMPING EFFECTS ON COUPLED HEAVE AND PITCH MOTION OF AN INNOVATIVE DEEP DRAFT MULTI-SPAR

MAXIMUM LOADS ON A 1-DOF MODEL-SCALE OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF CABLE PARAMETRIC VIBRATIONS

File name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

Some Aspects of Structural Dynamics

A damage-based condensation method to condense wave bins for tendon fatigue analysis

Notes for the Students by Marilena Greco:

TOPIC E: OSCILLATIONS SPRING 2019

HEAVE DAMPING EFFECTS DUE TO CIRCULAR PLATES ATTACHED AT KEEL TO SPAR HULL

Hydro-Elastic Contributions to Fatigue Damage on a Large Monopile

SEAKEEPING AND MANEUVERING Prof. Dr. S. Beji 2

Proceedings of the ASME th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2011

Chapter 15 - Oscillations

11/17/10. Chapter 14. Oscillations. Chapter 14. Oscillations Topics: Simple Harmonic Motion. Simple Harmonic Motion

In this lecture you will learn the following

Proceedings of OMAE'02 21 st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering June 23-27, 2002, Oslo, Norway

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 7 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

Double Spring Harmonic Oscillator Lab

Chapter 5 Design. D. J. Inman 1/51 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech

NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS OF AN ARTICULATED TOWER IN THE OCEAN

Dynamics of Ocean Structures Prof. Dr. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran Department of Ocean Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Session 1 : Fundamental concepts

Experimental testing of mooring systems for wave energy converters

Dynamic behavior of offshore spar platforms under regular sea waves

Reliability of Marine Structures Program

TOPIC E: OSCILLATIONS EXAMPLES SPRING Q1. Find general solutions for the following differential equations:

28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod)

Transcription:

Classification: Internal Status: Draft Classification of offshore structures A classification in degree of non-linearities and importance of dynamics. Sverre Haver, StatoilHydro, January 8 A first classification of structures Fixed Floating Articulated Rather small motions in particular vertical. Large motions vertically, very large motions horisontally depending on mooring system. Very large motions horizontally, small motions in vertical plane

3 Load generating environmental processes Waves. Wave severity changes in two time scales; ) Slowly varying (period in the order of hours) average characteristics (significant wave height and characteristic wave period), ) Rapidly fluctuating individual waves. Instaneous load caused by the rapid process. Typical period range in storms regarding the rapid fluctuations: 5 5s. Wind Wind severity is also varying in two time scales: ) Slowly varying mean characteristics, ) Relatively rapid fluctuating instantantaneous wind speed. Instantaneous process is caused by the instantaneous wind! Typical period range for fluctuating wind is: s minutes Current Current speed will vary slowly with time. For practical applications current is most frequently considered as constant flow speed. Typical period for fluctuations: Very long (order hours) 4 How to calculate motions of structures? Idealized example: Single degree of motion c k m x( F( Assuming linear mechanical system and linear external load: m &&+ x cx& kx = F( Assuming a sinusoidal wave process of frequency ω, F( will also be sinusoidal with some amplitude f and frequency ω. The solution will also be exponential, x( = x sin(ωt+θ) with: f x( ω) = k ω ω + 4 λ ω ω and θ ( ω) ω λ ω arctan ω ω = with: ω λ = = k m c c critical, natural frequency, damping ratio Observations: ω : X = f /k = x static θ = (in phase) ω ω : X infinity θ = 9 o out of phase ω >> ω : X θ = 8 out of phase Dangerous situation

5 Which natural periods (=π/ω ) do we phase for offshore structures? Fixed platforms: Jackets and GBS s: About: s for depth < m, 3-5s for -5m depth Jack-ups: About: 4-5s for depth of about 9 5m (depending on foundation solution). Floating platforms: Heave semi-submersible: Surge/sway of catenary moored semi submerisble: Pitch/Roll of semi submersible: Heave of Cell spar platform (see next page): Surge/sway of taut moored spar: Roll pitch of spar: 3 6s 6 9s 3 5s 5 35s 3 min. about min Articulated platforms Heave TLP 3s Surge/sway of TLP (3 4m depth): min. Roll/Pitch of TLP: 3.5s 6 Largest natural period versus depth for some platform concepts (illustrative figure). s TLP horizontal modes 6 Surge/sway semi-subm. Resonance can be initiated by wind and. order difference frequency loads Roll/pitch semi-subm. 5 4 Jack-up Spar heave Heave semi-subm. TLP, vertical modes Jacket 3 4 Unfavourable period band regarding. order wave loads Resonance can only be initiated by superharmonic wave loads or impact loads. (or VIV). 3

7 Example of fixed platforms Gravity Based Structure Jacket Jack-up 8 Classification of response problems Equation of motion general form for a single degree of freedom problem: m && x( + c( x, x& ) x& ( + k( x, x& ) x( = F ( We will introduce the following definitions regarding nature of the response problem: Linear mechanical system if: c ( x, x& ) = c and k ( x, x& ) = k Non-linear mechanical system otherwise. If the right hand side of eq. of motion, F(, is a linear function of the surface process assumed to be Gaussian, we will refere to the response problem as a linear response problem. 4

9 Linear response problem Facts: * Sea state is characterized by the wave spectrum, s ΞΞ (f). * The response properties are defined by the transfer function, h ΞX (f) * The response process will also be a Gaussian process. (Transfer function for frequency, f, is the complex response amplitude of when the system is exposed to a harmonic wave of unit amplitude. The absolute value of the transfer function is real response amplitude, i.e. phase information is lost. This quantity (the absolute value of the transfer function is called response amplitude operator, RAO(f).) The response process is completely characterized by the response spectrum which is given by: s XX ( f ) = h ΞX ( f ) s ΞΞ ( f ) When we are utilizing this approach we say that we solve the problem in the frequency domain! The only parameter involved in the Gaussian distribution (for a process of zero mean) is the variance which is given as the area under the response spectrum. Summary: For a linear response problem, we prefer to do the analysis in the frequency domain. This approach can be utilized both for a short term analysis and a full long term analysis. Non-linear loading example drag type loading I The non-linear drag load will often be governing in extreme wave conditions for jackets and jack-ups. π f ( z, = ρ cd d u( z, u( z, + ρ c 4 Drag term, u(z, is particle speed. M d u& ( z, Mass or inertial term, proportional to acceleration If T is shorter than the energetic wave periods, we can neglect the inertia term and the damping term of the equation of motion. Solution becomes: F( x( = k Summary: If dynamics can be neglected, we primarily have to find the instantaneous maximum of the total load acting on the structure. This is most frequently done by utilizing the Design Wave Method using a Stoke 5th order wave profile. A critical task is to predict proper height and period of the design wave. (We will come back to this.) 5

Non-linear loading example drag type loading II If the structural period is approaching the eenergetic wave period band, dynamics can not be neglected. For cases where the drag term represent a modest part of the total load, we may linearize the load function. We have a linear response problem and can use the methods suggested for such a system. (This can often be done for fatigue assessments.) If the drag term is important (maybe even governing), the situation is: Response process is no longer Gaussian and maxima not Rayleigh distributed The transferfunction is no longer a proper system characteristic. The sea surface is still charactrerized by the wave spectrum What can we do in order to find the short term distribution of response? Solving the equation of motion in the time domain. We will come back to this! A time domain solution is typically very fast as far as the mechanical system is non linear, i.e. no updating of damping and stiffness is necessary. Non-linear loading example drag type loading III A warning regarding dynamics of drag-dominated structures Background: An effect of non-linearity in the load function is that even if the structure is exposed to a harmonic wave with frequency ω, the load function wil show some energy at multiples of the frequency. This can be a problem if these higher frequencies hit a lightly damped structural mode. The total drag load on a vertical pile in deep water exposed to a sinusoidal wave is given by: L( = ρ cd d ω ξ sin( ωt ) ξ κ ( z ) dz sin( ω sin( ω, where for our purpose we use: κ ( z = e ) kz κ ( z) = z z > Numerical values used are: ρ = 5kg/m 3, c D =, d = 4m, ω =.49rad/s and ξ = 6m The surface elevation and the corresponding load are shown in next slid: 6

3 Non-linear loading example drag type loading IV A warning regarding dynamics of drag-dominated structures cont. Illustration of total drag load on pile Wave elevation, Total drag load 5 5-5 - -5 Surface elevation (m) Total load on pile (MN) - 4 6 8 4 6 Time (s) It is seen that the load history is not of a sinusoidal shape! A Fourier approximation is shown next slide: 4 Non-linear loading example drag type loading V A warning regarding dynamics of drag-dominated structures cont. Load function and its Fourier approximation 5 Load (kn) 4 3 Load function Fourier approximation (n=6) The various Fourier components up to 6 are shown below. It is observed that both the ω and the 3ω term are of a considerable amplitude. - - 4 6 8 4 6 Time (s) 3 The various Fourier components of total load Summary: If w and7or 3w terms hit a lightly samped natural mode, large response can be experienced. Note the constant term. For an process with varying wave crest heights this is one source for a slowly varying force that can hit natural periods of floaters. Load (kn) - - -3 4 6 8 4 6 Time (s) Constant term omega-component omega-component 3omega-component 4omega-component 5omega-component 6omega-component 7

5 Example of 3ω- exitation Response of Kvitebjørn jacket Kvitebjørn 6 Non-linear mechanical system Such a system will often be time comsuming if one is solving the equation of motion in the time domain. c and k may depend on the response and will therefore have to be updated by some iteration process between two time steps. An alternative approach for such systems is model testing. 8