NON-LINEAR CONTROL OF OUTPUT PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION FOR LINEAR ARMAX SYSTEMS

Similar documents
A NOVEL OPTIMAL PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION TRACKING FILTER DESIGN 1

Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate

1 Introduction 198; Dugard et al, 198; Dugard et al, 198) A delay matrix in such a lower triangular form is called an interactor matrix, and almost co

Adaptive State Feedback Nash Strategies for Linear Quadratic Discrete-Time Games

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION - Vol. V - Prediction Error Methods - Torsten Söderström

FERMENTATION BATCH PROCESS MONITORING BY STEP-BY-STEP ADAPTIVE MPCA. Ning He, Lei Xie, Shu-qing Wang, Jian-ming Zhang

Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems

ON-LINE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CONTROL STRATEGY IN AN EMULSION COPOLYMERIZATION REACTOR

Gaussian-Shaped Circularly-Symmetric 2D Filter Banks

Algorithm for Multiple Model Adaptive Control Based on Input-Output Plant Model

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION - Vol. V - Recursive Algorithms - Han-Fu Chen

Information geometry for bivariate distribution control

A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems

ADAPTIVE INVERSE CONTROL BASED ON NONLINEAR ADAPTIVE FILTERING. Information Systems Lab., EE Dep., Stanford University

Stability Analysis of Linear Systems with Time-varying State and Measurement Delays

MANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation

ADAPTIVE PID CONTROLLER WITH ON LINE IDENTIFICATION

Variable Learning Rate LMS Based Linear Adaptive Inverse Control *

Predictive PDF Control in Shaping of Molecular Weight Distribution Based on a New Modeling Algorithm

Recursive Least Squares for an Entropy Regularized MSE Cost Function

Dictionary Learning for L1-Exact Sparse Coding

Performance Assessment of Power Plant Main Steam Temperature Control System based on ADRC Control

Expressions for the covariance matrix of covariance data

IN recent years, controller design for systems having complex

Edge Theorem for Multivariable Systems 1

Entropy Information Based Assessment of Cascade Control Loops

Finite-Dimensional Risk-Sensitive Filters and Smoothers for Discrete-Time Nonlinear Systems

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Estimation of Linear System Noise Covariances

Comparison of Necessary Conditions for Typical Takagi Sugeno and Mamdani Fuzzy Systems as Universal Approximators

Maximum Likelihood Diffusive Source Localization Based on Binary Observations

Asymptotic behaviour of Toeplitz matrix in multi-input multi-output model predictive control

ThM06-2. Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure

MRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance

Multilayer Perceptron

ON THE PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTY OF WEAKLY REVERSIBLE REALIZATIONS OF KINETIC SYSTEMS

Sliding Window Recursive Quadratic Optimization with Variable Regularization

Riccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints

DISCRETE-TIME ADAPTIVE LQG/LTR CONTROL

UTILIZING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE IN ROBUST OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN. EE & CS, The University of Newcastle, Australia EE, Technion, Israel.

ESTIMATOR STABILITY ANALYSIS IN SLAM. Teresa Vidal-Calleja, Juan Andrade-Cetto, Alberto Sanfeliu

APPROXIMATE SOLUTION OF A SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS WITH RANDOM PERTURBATIONS

STOCHASTIC STABILITY OF EXTENDED FILTERING FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH MEASUREMENT PACKET LOSSES

Adaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach

Further Results on Model Structure Validation for Closed Loop System Identification

Research Article Stabilization Analysis and Synthesis of Discrete-Time Descriptor Markov Jump Systems with Partially Unknown Transition Probabilities

The Equilibrium Equivalent Representation for Variational Inequalities Problems with Its Application in Mixed Traffic Flows

Closed loop Identification of Four Tank Set up Using Direct Method

Model-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate

EFFICIENT SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION AND LOCAL SENSITIVITIES

NEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in

CANONICAL LOSSLESS STATE-SPACE SYSTEMS: STAIRCASE FORMS AND THE SCHUR ALGORITHM

An Novel Continuation Power Flow Method Based on Line Voltage Stability Index

On robustness of suboptimal min-max model predictive control *

Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays

Performance Limitations for Linear Feedback Systems in the Presence of Plant Uncertainty

Structured Stochastic Uncertainty

Constrained State Estimation Using the Unscented Kalman Filter

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Stabilization of Higher Periodic Orbits of Discrete-time Chaotic Systems

EECE Adaptive Control

Multirate MVC Design and Control Performance Assessment: a Data Driven Subspace Approach*

Gaussian Estimation under Attack Uncertainty

Process Identification for an SOPDT Model Using Rectangular Pulse Input

ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE INFLUENCE OF MEASUREMENT NOISE ON MVC BASED CONTROLLER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

Fuzzy control of a class of multivariable nonlinear systems subject to parameter uncertainties: model reference approach

On Identification of Cascade Systems 1

ASIGNIFICANT research effort has been devoted to the. Optimal State Estimation for Stochastic Systems: An Information Theoretic Approach

On Transmitter Design in Power Constrained LQG Control

H State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions

ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES ALGORITHMS

in a Rao-Blackwellised Unscented Kalman Filter

Closed-Loop Identification using Routine Operating Data: the Effect of Time Delay

Multi-Layer Perceptrons for Functional Data Analysis: a Projection Based Approach 0

Two Further Gradient BYY Learning Rules for Gaussian Mixture with Automated Model Selection

NP-hardness of the stable matrix in unit interval family problem in discrete time

Minimum-Information-Entropy-Based Control Performance Assessment

EFFICIENT LINEAR MIMO ADAPTIVE ŜP INVERSE CONTROL. Gregory L. Plett E

DIGITAL STABILIZATION OF LINEAR CONTINUOUS-TIME PERIODIC PROCESSES WITH PURE DELAY

IMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS. Shumei Mu, Tianguang Chu, and Long Wang

APPLICATION OF D-K ITERATION TECHNIQUE BASED ON H ROBUST CONTROL THEORY FOR POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER DESIGN

A METHOD OF ADAPTATION BETWEEN STEEPEST- DESCENT AND NEWTON S ALGORITHM FOR MULTI- CHANNEL ACTIVE CONTROL OF TONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION

Analytical approach to tuning of model predictive control for first-order plus dead time models Peyman Bagheri, Ali Khaki Sedigh

FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez

RECURSIVE SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION IN THE LEAST SQUARES FRAMEWORK

Correspondence. Sampled-Data Filtering with Error Covariance Assignment

ON THE USE OF RANDOM VARIABLES IN PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GAUSSIAN AND UNIFORM DISTRIBUTIONS

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY invertible, that is (1) In this way, on, and on, system (3) becomes

EECE Adaptive Control

Research Article Weighted Measurement Fusion White Noise Deconvolution Filter with Correlated Noise for Multisensor Stochastic Systems

On the continuity of the J-spectral factorization mapping

Bidirectional Representation and Backpropagation Learning

Chapter 2 Application to DC Circuits

State Estimation by IMM Filter in the Presence of Structural Uncertainty 1

Self-tuning Control Based on Discrete Sliding Mode

Adaptive Dual Control

Progress in MPC Identification: A Case Study on Totally Closed-Loop Plant Test

Optimal Control of Linear Systems with Stochastic Parameters for Variance Suppression: The Finite Time Case

Simultaneous State and Fault Estimation for Descriptor Systems using an Augmented PD Observer

Curriculum Vitae Wenxiao Zhao

Model Identification and Validation for a Heating System using MATLAB System Identification Toolbox

Transcription:

Control 4, University of Bath, UK, September 4 ID-83 NON-LINEAR CONTROL OF OUTPUT PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION FOR LINEAR ARMAX SYSTEMS H. Yue, H. Wang Control Systems Centre, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, United Kingdom Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 8, China Email: h.yue@umist.ac.u; hong.wang@umist.ac.u Fax: 44-6-3858 Keywords: ARMAX model, stochastic system, probability density function (PDF, non-linear control. Abstract A new control algorithm has been developed for linear stochastic ARMAX systems subjected to arbitrary random inputs. The purpose is to mae the shape of the output probability density function (PDF to be as close as possible to a target PDF. A feedbac control function is formulated to re-configure the open-loop linear system into a non-linear closed-loop system, where the vector of control parameters has been designed so as to minimize the difference between the output and the target PDFs. Issues of closed-loop stability are discussed. Introduction As required by a number of practical systems such as the particle size distribution control [-3] and molecular weight distribution control [4-6] in polymerisation processes, 3D paper solids density distribution control in paper industries [7] and particle size distribution control in powder industries [8-9], etc., the shape control of the output probability density function (PDF of general stochastic systems has been a subject of research in recent years [-]. For these systems, the main purpose of the controller design is to select a control input that can mae the shape of the output PDF of a general stochastic system to follow a target probability density function. Compared with the traditional stochastic control methods such as minimum variance control and LQG control [, ], the PDF shaping methods have two main advantages: the PDF contains full information of the system output including its mean and variance; it is not required that the system is subjected to Gaussian noise only. The development of output PDF shaping control are based on the following models:- B-spline weights model [-5] Input-output ARMAX model [6-8] Multi-layer neural-networ model [9- ] So far most of the PDF shaping methods are based on the first group of modelling techniques, in which a B-spline neural networ is used to approximate the measurable output PDF of the considered stochastic system. Once the basis functions are chosen and fixed, the shape of the output PDF is determined by the B-spline expansion coefficients. In this context, PDF shaping control is transferred into the control of the B-spline coefficients vector. This leads to a number of algorithms that aim to minimize the following performance index ( (, T J = γ xu gx dx+ u Ru ( x Ω where is the control input, R is the weighting matrix, u γ ( x, u is the output probability density function at sample time when controlled by u, g( x is the given target probability density function, Ω is definition domain of x. The first term in equation ( is an integral measure of the distance between the output PDF and its target. Although simple algorithms can be obtained from this group of research, some limitations of the B-spline methods shouldn t be ignored: the effectiveness of the closed-loop control relies on the selection of the basis functions; the number of basis functions will increase dramatically if the system has multiple outputs; 3 the requirement of available (measurable output PDFs may be too strict for some applications. Therefore, other models are also considered for PDF shaping control. For example, multi-layer neural networ models have been used to approximate the PDFs when the system has more than one output [9, ]. As for the input-output based approaches, normally a general ARMAX model is used, where the first step towards the controller design is to find a secondary model that lins the PDF of the random input, the control input and some historical output measurements to the current conditional output PDF. This enables the direct optimisation being performed so as to find the required control input. Both linear [6] and non-linear ARMAX models [7, 8] have been considered for the PDF control or the minimum entropy control. In the linear case [6], it has been shown that when the control input u is related to the previous output of the system, only the position shift of the output PDF can be achieved, the shape of the output PDF cannot be changed at all. In the non-linear case [7], an approximated recursive relationship has been established for the convolution of the conditional output PDFs, which results in a numerical

Control 4, University of Bath, UK, September 4 ID-83 solution to the problem. However, the robustness of such a numerical approach needs to be further analysed. The main idea of this paper is to find out how the conditional output PDF of a general linear ARMAX system can be controlled via a non-linear control function, which has an instant feedbac from the system output. As the closed-loop system thus formulated is non-linear, it is expected that the conditional output PDF can be controlled to an arbitrary shape. Output PDF model Consider the following ARMAX model for linear SISO stochastic systems where y and Aq y Bq u = + ( n A( q i = aq i (3 i= Bq R is the system output, b j m j = bq j (4 j= u R is the control input, a i are nown parameters of the system, n and m are nown structure orders, q is the bac shift unit operator. is a random noise input that has a nown probability density function γ ( x as defined on x [ ab, ] with a and b being nown and possibly infinite. In practice, γ ( x can be estimated using ernel estimation theory []. Denote γ ( x, u as the conditional output probability density function and assume that its definition domain is also x [ ab, ], then at sample time, the purpose of the control input design is to:- find out a control input u that controls the shape of the output PDF of y, namely γ ( x, u, so that γ ( x, u is made as close as possible to a given PDF g( x, which is also defined on x [ ab, ]; ensure that the so formed control input is a feedbac function of the current output, the historical outputs and the historical control inputs. For this purpose, the following non-linear control function is proposed n m u = y f ( y, φ, θ aiyi bju b i= j= j (5 where f ( is a pre-specified non-linear function which is assumed to be invertible with respect to y ; φ groups all the past inputs and outputs as ( y,, y, u,, u φ n m = (6 This means φ is nown at time. θ is a parameter vector to be designed, the size of which depends on the controller formulation. For example, if the following non-linear structure is adopted for f ( f( y, φ, θ = sin( αy βy (7 3 then a pair of parameters ( α, β are to be designed. Taing equation (6 into equation (5, u is further represented as u = ( y f ( y, φ, θ φ (8 b The controller in equation (8 has non-linear nature because of f (. Therefore, the closed-loop system composed by equations (-(6 is also non-linear. This allows the shape control of the conditional output probability density function to go beyond the shift of γ ( x only. Indeed, by substituting equation (8 into the open-loop equations (-4, it can be derived that the closed-loop system should have the following format (,, f y φ θ = (9 Since it has been assumed that function f ( is invertible with respect to y, then y can be solved from equation (9 to give y = f (, φ, θ ( which reveals a general non-linear relationship between (,, and φ θ. As the probability density function of is assumed nown to be γ ( x, the conditional probability density function of y can be readily formulated from equation ( to read [3] ( x, φ, θ f γ( x, u = γ ( f ( x, φ, θ, x [ a, b ] ( x From equation ( it is concluded that selecting a control input u to shape γ ( x, u is equivalent to choosing a proper parameter vector θ so that γ ( x, u is controlled to its target once the control function f ( is selected. This indicates that one can simply denote γ ( x, u as γ ( x, θ and describe the output PDF as ( x, φ, θ f γ( x, θ = γ ( f ( x, φ, θ, x [ a, b] x y ( Equation ( is the secondary model of the output PDF showing that γ ( x, θ is decided by f ( and θ.

Control 4, University of Bath, UK, September 4 ID-83 3 Closed-loop PDF control system 3. Controller design The purpose of controller design is now transformed into the formulation of the non-linear function f ( and the selection of the parameter vector θ, at sample time, so that the following performance function is minimized. b J = (, γ x θ g x dx+ Ru (3 a Such an optimisation is subjected to equation ( and can be reformulated to be ( x, φ, θ b f J = γ ( f ( x, φ, θ g( x dx a x + R ( y f ( y, φ, θ φ b (4 The minimum solution to equation (4 may be obtained by = θ (5 in certain cases. However, due to the complexity of the integral nature involved in equation (4, a compact solution to equation (5 may be difficult to obtain. Instead, a gradient search can be applied, i.e. = (6 θl θl λ θ θ = θl where l ( l is the number of iteration steps and λ is the gradient factor. Although equation (6 only provides a local minimum solution to the performance index in equation (4, there seems to be no better choices when f( y, φ, θ only taes a general form of a non-linear function. In fact, if the structure of f( y, φ, θ can be parametized in the design, some state-of-the-art optimal solution by equation (5 may be available based on the specific formulation of f( y, φ, θ. In some situations, the target probability density function g( x may be difficult to establish from real systems, then the control algorithm design should be performed by minimizing the entropy of the system output or the entropy of the output tracing errors. The minimum entropy control of the system output can be realized by defining the following performance function b J = (, log ( (, γ x θ γ x θ dx+ Ru (7 a where the first term is the entropy of y as defined in probability theory. As the entropy index is used to describe the uncertainty of general non-gaussian systems, the minimum solution to equation (7 is believed to reduce the uncertainty of the closed-loop system [5,8]. 3. Stability issues As described in section, the noise probability density function γ ( x is defined on x [ ab, ] with a and b being nown or possibly infinite. In the following, these two cases will be discussed separately for the analysis of the closedloop stability. A. Noise with bounded PDF When both a and b are bounded, it means that the noise term is defined on a bounded domain. From the closedloop formulation in equation (9, it also implies that the preselected non-linear function f( y, φ, θ must be bounded. In this case, the closed-loop stability can be realized by maing sure that the inverse of f( y, φ, θ (with respect to y! is also uniformly bounded for the closed-loop equation (9. In fact, under this circumstance, we have y = f (, φ, θ <, θ (8 Equation (8 indicates that y is uniformly bounded. It can be seen from equations ( (4 and (9 that Since both Bq u = Aq y f( y, φ, θ (9 y and f( y, φ, θ are uniformly bounded, when Bq ( is stable, u is also uniformly bounded. The conditions for the closed-loop stability can be summarized in the following theorem. Theorem. Suppose that i the polynomial Bq ( is stable, and that ii a and b are bounded, then the closed-loop system described by equations (8 and (9 are uniformly bounded if f( y, φ, θ is selected such that the following inequality is satisfied. B. Noise with unbounded PDF f (, φ, θ <, θ ( If at least one of a or b is infinite, the condition of critical closed-loop stability does not exist because the main tas is to mae the conditional output PDF to follow a desired g( x that is defined on an infinite interval. This would be similar to the case in linear minimum variance control [] when γ ( x is a Gaussian function, where the uniform boundness of the output cannot be guaranteed as y is a Gaussian random process defined on an infinite domain

Control 4, University of Bath, UK, September 4 ID-83 (, of y. In this case, only the boundness of the mean value will be discussed. When either a or b is infinite, although y itself is within an unbounded interval, its mean value can still be made uniformly bounded under certain conditions. Assume that the mean value of the noise term is bounded, i.e. then from equation (9 it can be seen that E{ } < ( E{ f y, φ, θ } < ( If we can assume that f( y, φ, θ is selected such that it is monotonic with respect to, then from equations ( and y (, the monotonic inverse of f( y, φ, θ also has the uniform boundness as E{ y} E{ f, φ, θ } = < (3 As a result, if Bq ( is stable, then from equations (9, ( and (3, it can be concluded that E{ u} = E ( A( q y f( y, φ, θ < Bq This result can be summarized as follows. Theorem. Suppose that i the polynomial Bq ( is stable, (4 ii E{ } <, and iii f( y, φ, θ is monotonic with respect to y, then regardless of θ, the mean values of the input and output of the closed-loop system described by equations (8 and (9 are uniformly bounded. 4 An example Consider the following linear system y ay bu = + + (5 where it is assumed that the probability density function of is given by γ x ( x = e, x [, (6 which corresponds to a = and b =. The target probability density function is given to be g( x = xe x (7 In this case, one can construct the following control function u = y f y a y (8 ( (, φ, θ b where and θ R. ( f( y, φ, θ = y + y θ (9 Using equation (, the conditional output probability density function is developed to be x ( + y θ γ( x, θ = + y θ xe (3 ( For this simple example, we can just select θ = (3 + y then the non-linear function reduces to f( y, φ, θ = y (3 and the control input and the output of the closed-loop system turn out to be u = y y a y ( b y (33 = (34 The output probability density function is controlled to be x γ( x, θ = xe (35 Therefore, the target distribution in equation (7 is achieved via the non-linear control law in equations (8, (9 and the tuning rule in equation (3. The first term in the performance index (3 is zero and the second term forms J, which is only related to the input noise, i.e., (( a R J = (36 b As J in equation (36 might not be the optimal solution for the whole performance index in equation (3, the gradient approach in equation (6 can be used, in which the gradient is represented as l x 4 ( yl αl x e α = + θ dx θ= θl in which ( + αl 4 x + yl x e dx 4 l x 4 yl αl x e α + dx 4 ( + αl 4 x + + yl αl x e dx R y lαl ( y y a y l αl l l (37 b ( l αl = + y θ (38 l

Control 4, University of Bath, UK, September 4 ID-83 5 Conclusions In this paper, a new parametric control algorithm has been established that is capable of controlling the shape of the conditional output probability density function for a linear stochastic system represented by an ARMAX model. The system is subjected to any arbitrary random input with a nown probability density function. The obtained controller is generally non-linear and its embedded parameter vector can be selected so as to control the conditional PDF of the output to be close to a given target PDF. This result is the extension of the recent wor published by Wang and Zhang [6] where only the shift control of the probability density function of the conditional output for linear systems is achieved. Acnowledgements The authors would lie to than the financial support of the Chinese NSFC grant 6833 and UK's Leverhulme Trust grant F/38/D. References [] T. J. Crowley, E. S. Meadows, E. Kostoulas, F. J. Doyle III. Control of particle size distribution described by a population balance model of semibatch emulsion polymerisation, Journal of Process Control,, pp. 49-43, (. [] J. Flores-Cerrillo, J. F. MacGregor, Control of particle size distributions in emulsion semibatch polymerization using mid-course correction polices, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 4, pp. 85 84, (. [3] C. D. Immanuel, F. J. Doyle III. Open-loop control of particle size distribution on semi-batch emulsion copolymerisation using a genetic algorithm, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57, pp. 445 447, (. [4] T. L. Clare-Pringle, J. F. MacGregor. Optimization of molecular-weight distribution using batch-to-batch adjustments, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, pp. 366 3669, (998. [5] A. Echevarria, J. R. Leiza, J. C. de la Cal, J. M. Asua. Molecular weight distribution control in emulsion polymerisation, AIChE Journal, 44, pp.667 679, (998. [6] M. Vicente, S. BenAmor, L. M. Gugliotta, J. R. Leiza, J. M. Asua. Control of molecular weight distribution in emulsion polymerization using on-line reaction calorimetry, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 4, pp. 8 7, (. [7] G. A. Smoo. Handboo for Pulp and Paper Technologists, Angus Wilde Publications, (998. [8] R. A. Ee, O. H. Bosgra. Controllability of particulate processes in relation to the sensor characteristics, Powder Technology, 8, pp.37-46, (. [9] H. J. C. Gommeren, D. A. Heitzmann, J. A. C. Moolenaar, B. Scarlett. Modelling and control of a jet mill plant, Powder Technology, 8, pp.47-54, (. [] M. Karny. Towards fully probabilistic control design, Automatica,, pp. 79-7, (996. [] H. Wang. Robust control of the output probability density functions for multivariable stochastic systems, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 44, pp. 3-7, (999. [] H. Wang. Bounded Dynamic Stochastic Systems: Modelling and Control, Springer-Verlag London Limited, (. [3] H. Wang, H. Bai and P. Kabore. Control of bounded dynamic stochastic distributions using square root models: an applicability study in papermaing system, Trans. Inst. of Measurement and Control, 3, pp. 5-68, (. [4] H. Wang, H. Yue. A rational spline model approximation and control of output probability density function for dynamic stochastic systems, Trans. Inst. of Measurement and Control, 3, 5, pp. 93-5, (3. [5] H. Wang. Minimum entropy control for non-gaussian dynamic stochastic systems, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 47, pp.398 43, (. [6] H. Wang, J. H. Zhang. Bounded stochastic distribution control for pseudo ARMAX systems, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 46, pp. 486-49, (. [7] H. Wang. Control of conditional output probability density functions for general non-linear and non- Gaussian dynamic stochastic systems, IEE Proc. Control Theory and Applications, 5, pp. 55 6, 3. [8] H. Yue and H. Wang. Minimum entropy control of closed-loop tracing errors for dynamic stochastic systems, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 48, pp. 8, (3. [9] H. Wang. Multivariable output probability density function control for non-gaussian stochastic systems using simple MLP neural networs, Proc. IFAC Int. Conf. on Intelligent Control Systems and Signal Processing, University of Algarve, Portugal, April 8-, 3, pp.84-89, (3. [] W. Wang, H. Wang, H. Yue. MIMO probability density function control using simple MLP neural networs, The 4th IASTED Int. Conf. on Modelling, Simulation, and Optimization, Kauai, Hawaii, August 7-9, 4. (in print [] K. J. Astrom. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory, Academic press, New Yor, (97. [] K. J. Astrom and B. Wittenmar. Adaptive Control, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, (988. [3] J. L. Melsa and P. S. Andrew, An Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Processes, T. Kailath (ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, (973.

2024 © sciencedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback