What is a proof? Proofing as a social process, a communication art.

Similar documents
a. See the textbook for examples of proving logical equivalence using truth tables. b. There is a real number x for which f (x) < 0. (x 1) 2 > 0.

Math 38: Graph Theory Spring 2004 Dartmouth College. On Writing Proofs. 1 Introduction. 2 Finding A Solution

Section Summary. Proof by Cases Existence Proofs

For all For every For each For any There exists at least one There exists There is Some

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

3 The language of proof

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

Strategies for Proofs

1.1 Language and Logic

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

Math 300 Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning Autumn 2017 Proof Templates 1

1.1 Statements and Compound Statements

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

Direct Proof MAT231. Fall Transition to Higher Mathematics. MAT231 (Transition to Higher Math) Direct Proof Fall / 24

Chapter 2. Mathematical Reasoning. 2.1 Mathematical Models

Proofs. Joe Patten August 10, 2018

Topics in Logic and Proofs

Lecture 2: Proof Techniques Lecturer: Lale Özkahya

Sec$on Summary. Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Trivial & Vacuous Proofs Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs

Proof by Contradiction

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Inference and Proofs (1.6 & 1.7)

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH WINTER

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH SPRING

Proof by contrapositive, contradiction

Mathematical Reasoning (Part I) 1

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

2-4: The Use of Quantifiers

Logical Operators. Conjunction Disjunction Negation Exclusive Or Implication Biconditional

1.1 Language and Logic

Mathematics 220 Homework 4 - Solutions. Solution: We must prove the two statements: (1) if A = B, then A B = A B, and (2) if A B = A B, then A = B.

Section 1.7 Proof Methods and Strategy. Existence Proofs. xp(x). Constructive existence proof:

Argument. whenever all the assumptions are true, then the conclusion is true. If today is Wednesday, then yesterday is Tuesday. Today is Wednesday.

Foundations of Discrete Mathematics

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

Logic Overview, I. and T T T T F F F T F F F F

Discrete Mathematics & Mathematical Reasoning Predicates, Quantifiers and Proof Techniques

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)

Introduction to Basic Proof Techniques Mathew A. Johnson

HOW TO WRITE PROOFS. Dr. Min Ru, University of Houston

Exercise Set 1 Solutions Math 2020 Due: January 30, Find the truth tables of each of the following compound statements.

PROBLEM SET 3: PROOF TECHNIQUES

FILE NAME: PYTHAGOREAN_TRIPLES_012-( WED).DOCX AUTHOR: DOUG JONES

Logic and Proofs. (A brief summary)

Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.

CSCE 222 Discrete Structures for Computing. Review for Exam 1. Dr. Hyunyoung Lee !!!

Introduction to Metalogic 1

1 Direct Proofs Technique Outlines Example Implication Proofs Technique Outlines Examples...

Writing proofs for MATH 61CM, 61DM Week 1: basic logic, proof by contradiction, proof by induction

Introducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents

Propositional Logic. Fall () Propositional Logic Fall / 30

Proofs. An (informal) proof is an essay that will persuade a logical reader that a mathematical theorem is true.

Definitions Chapter 1 Proof Technique (Pg.1): Proof (Pg.2): Statement (Pg.2): Conditional Statement/Implication (Pg3.): Hypothesis(Pg.

Basics of Proofs. 1 The Basics. 2 Proof Strategies. 2.1 Understand What s Going On

PROBLEM SOLVING. (2n +1) 3 =8n 3 +12n 2 +6n +1=2(4n 3 +6n 2 +3n)+1.

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

2 Elementary number theory

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

MATH CSE20 Homework 5 Due Monday November 4

Logical Reasoning. Chapter Statements and Logical Operators

Lecture 2. Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits. Reading (Epp s textbook)

Proofs. Introduction II. Notes. Notes. Notes. Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry. Fall 2007

Homework 3: Solutions

Mathematics 220 Midterm Practice problems from old exams Page 1 of 8

A Little Deductive Logic

Section 2.3: Statements Containing Multiple Quantifiers

Proof: If (a, a, b) is a Pythagorean triple, 2a 2 = b 2 b / a = 2, which is impossible.

Mathematical Reasoning & Proofs

Proof techniques (section 2.1)

Review for Midterm 1. Andreas Klappenecker

Predicate Logic. Andreas Klappenecker

COT 2104 Homework Assignment 1 (Answers)

Handout on Logic, Axiomatic Methods, and Proofs MATH Spring David C. Royster UNC Charlotte

Some Review Problems for Exam 1: Solutions

Show Your Work! Point values are in square brackets. There are 35 points possible. Tables of tautologies and contradictions are on the last page.

The statement calculus and logic

A Little Deductive Logic

Predicate logic. G. Carl Evans. Summer University of Illinois. Propositional Logic Review Predicate logic Predicate Logic Examples

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall

MATH 271 Summer 2016 Practice problem solutions Week 1

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs

Quantifiers. P. Danziger

VALIDITY IN SENTENTIAL LOGIC

COMP Intro to Logic for Computer Scientists. Lecture 15

The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

Lecture 7 Feb 4, 14. Sections 1.7 and 1.8 Some problems from Sec 1.8

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2016 Seshia and Walrand Note 2

Section 1.2: Conditional Statements

VALIDITY IN SENTENTIAL LOGIC

DRAFT (March 12, 2018) c 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 Thoo

Supplementary Logic Notes CSE 321 Winter 2009

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 3 Truth Trees

Writing Mathematical Proofs

Carmen s Core Concepts (Math 135)

CS100: DISCRETE STRUCTURES. Lecture 5: Logic (Ch1)

Transcription:

Proof Methods

What is a proof? Proofing as a social process, a communication art. Theoretically, a proof of a mathematical statement is no different than a logically valid argument starting with some premises and ending with the statement. However, in the real world such logically valid arguments can get so long and involved that they lose their "punch" and require too much time to verify. In mathematics, the purpose of a proof is to convince the reader of the proof that there is a logically valid argument in the background. Both the writer and the reader must be convinced that such an argument can be produced if needed.

What is a Proof? Writing mathematical proofs is therefore an art form (the art of convincing) and a social process since it is directed at people (the readers). A mathematical proof of a statement strongly depends on who the proof is written for. Proofs for a research audience are quite different from those found in textbooks. And even textbook proofs look different depending on the level of the audience (high school vs. college vs. graduate school). To simplify our task in this course, you will write all of your proofs with a specific audience in mind: ME!

What is a Proof? That is, you are writing to convince me that you could drop down to the logic level and provide all the details, if I asked you to do so. Rigor in proofs. The above remarks should not be construed to mean that you can get sloppy with your proofs your audience requires clarity, precision and, above all, correctness. Phrases such as "clearly" or "it is easy to see that" are neither clear nor easy for this audience. When you say something follows from a definition, I want to know "the definition of what?"

General Hints The importance of definitions. It can not be overemphasized how important definitions are. Without a clear and crisp understanding of a definition, you will not be able to use it in a proof. You have to be able to recall a definition precisely when it is needed vague familiarity will not work for you. Working backwards. There is a big difference between discovering a proof and presenting a proof. In presenting a proof you must be convincing, and things need to follow in a logical order. To discover a proof, you are under no such restrictions and often the best procedure is to work the problem backwards.

Methods of Proof We will survey the basic proof methods. In doing so, our examples to illustrate the techniques should not be very complicated... so we will restrict them to fairly simple statements which do not need a great deal of background to understand. The Theory of Numbers provides an excellent source for such examples... so most of our examples will deal with numbers in this section. Remember that our aim is not to learn more about the theory of numbers, most of the examples will be statements that you know are true, rather we are interested in the way that the proofs are constructed... so, concentrate on the techniques.

Direct Proof In a direct proof one starts with the premise (hypothesis) and proceed directly to the conclusion with a chain of implications. Most simple proofs are of this kind. Definitions: An integer n is odd iff there exists an integer k so that n = 2k+1. An integer n is even iff there exists an integer k so that n = 2k. Example of a direct proof: If n is an odd integer then n 2 is odd. Pf: Let n be an odd integer. There exists an integer k so that n = 2k+1. n 2 = (2k+1) 2 = 4k 2 + 4k + 1 n 2 = 2(2k 2 + 2k) + 1 Since 2k 2 + 2k is an integer, n 2 is odd.

Contrapositive Proof When proving a conditional, one can prove the contrapositive statement instead of the original this is called a contrapositive proof. Example: If n 2 is an odd integer, then n is odd. Pf: Suppose n is an even integer. There exists an integer k so that n = 2k. n 2 = (2k) 2 = 4k 2 = 2(2k 2 ) Since 2k 2 is an integer, n 2 is even.

Contradiction Proofs This proof method is based on the Law of the Excluded Middle. Essentially, if you can show that a statement can not be false, then it must be true. In practice, you assume that the statement you are trying to prove is false and then show that this leads to a contradiction (any contradiction). This method can be applied to any type of statement, not just conditional statements. There is no way to predict what the contradiction will be. The method is wide-spread and is often found in short segments of larger proofs. For example,...

Another Contrapositive Proof Definition: An integer n divides an integer m, written n m, iff there exists an integer k so that m = nk. Example: If A and B are integers and B 0. Show that if A divides B then A B. Pf: Suppose that A > B. (Note that A 0.) Then 1 > B / A > 0. If A B then there is an integer k so that B = Ak. k = B/A and the integer k = B / A. But, there is no integer 1 > k > 0. So A does not divide B.

Contradiction Proof Definition: A real number r is rational iff it can be written as r = a/b with a and b integers and b 0. A real number is irrational if it is not rational. Example: The 2 is irrational. Pf: BWOC assume that 2 is rational. There exist integers p and q so that 2 = p/q. We may assume that the fraction is reduced, i.e. no integer divides both p and q. 2 = p 2 /q 2 2q 2 = p 2, so p 2 is even. Thus, p is even.

2 is irrational There exists an integer k so that p = 2k. 2q 2 = p 2 = (2k) 2 = 4k 2 q 2 = 2k 2. So, q 2 is even and therefore q is even. Since 2 divides both p and q we have a contradiction So, 2 is not rational. This proof is due to Euclid, but the theorem dates back to Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans.

Proofs of Biconditionals A proof of a P Q statement usually uses the tautology P Q (P Q) (Q P) That is, we prove an iff statement by seperately proving the "if" part and the "only if" part. Example: Integer a is odd if and only if a+1 is even. Pf: (Sufficiency, if a is odd then a+1 is even) Suppose a is an odd integer. There exists an integer k so that a = 2k + 1. a+1 = (2k+1) + 1 = 2k+2 = 2(k+1) Since k+1 is an integer, a+1 is even.

Proofs of Biconditionals Example: Integer a is odd if and only if a+1 is even. Pf: (Necessity, if a+1 is even then a is odd) Suppose a+1 is an even integer. There exists an integer k so that a+1 = 2k. a = a + 1 1 = (2k) - 1 = (2(k-1) + 2) 1 = 2(k-1) + 1 Since k-1 is an integer, a is odd.

Uniqueness Proofs Proofs of existentially quantified statements ( x P(x)) can be constructive in which case you produce an x which makes P(x) true, or non-constructive when you use contradiction to show that ~( x P(x)) is false. Definition: To say that there is one and only one x which makes the predicate P(x) true, we write (!x P(x)) (there exists a unique x such that P(x)). To prove a (!x P(x)) statement, we first prove ( x P(x)) and then show that if P(x) and P(y) are both true, we must have x = y.

Uniqueness Proofs Definition: Let a and b be two positive integers. If n is a positive integer and a n and b n, then we call n a common multiple of a and b. If n is a common multiple of a and b, and if for every other common multiple, m, of a and b we have that n m, we say that n is a least common multiple of a and b. In this case, we write n = LCM(a,b). Example: For all positive integers a and b, LCM(a,b) is unique. Pf: (We shall omit the proof of the existence of the LCM and just show it's uniqueness, assuming that it exists.) Let a and b be positive integers. Suppose m 1 and m 2 are two LCM's for a and b. Since m 1 is an LCM and m 2 is a common multiple, m 1 m 2, so m 1 m 2. Since m 2 is an LCM and m 1 is a common multiple, m 2 m 1, so m 2 m 1. Therefore, m 1 = m 2.