Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

Regional Growth Strategy Work Session Growth Management Policy Board

The CRP stresses a number of factors that point to both our changing demographics and our future opportunities with recommendations for:

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Metrolinx Transit Accessibility/Connectivity Toolkit

ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

Census Urban Area Comparisons, 2000 to 2010

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

Council Workshop on Neighbourhoods Thursday, October 4 th, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Burlington Performing Arts Centre

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

Urban Planning Word Search Level 1

Weather Information for Surface Transportation (WIST): Update on Weather Impacts and WIST Progress

Travel behavior of low-income residents: Studying two contrasting locations in the city of Chennai, India

Regional Growth Strategy Regional Staff Committee

Regional Growth Strategy Regional TOD Advisory Committee

Regional Performance Measures

Growth Management: Analysis of Comments Received and Responses Comments received as of October 16, 2017

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

Sustainable Suburbs: Restructuring Suburban Development

Regional Performance Measures

The 3V Approach. Transforming the Urban Space through Transit Oriented Development. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader World Bank Hub Singapore

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

BROOKINGS May

Joint Planning Advisory Council July 19, 2011

Integrated Infrastructure Planning & Spatial Mapping

São Paulo Metropolis and Macrometropolis - territories and dynamics of a recent urban transition

Foreword. Vision and Strategy

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

GOVERNMENT MAPPING WORKSHOP RECOVER Edmonton s Urban Wellness Plan Mapping Workshop December 4, 2017

City and SUMP of Ravenna

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

State initiative following up the 2006 national planning report

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

MODULE 1 INTRODUCING THE TOWNSHIP RENEWAL CHALLENGE

Initial Findings from Regional Initiatives Planning Enhancement Fair Housing & Equity Assessment

submission to plan melbourne

New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH

Vincent Goodstadt. Head of European Affairs METREX European Network

Ireland 2040 Our Plan. National Planning Framework

Community Engagement in Cultural Routes SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation Sara Levi Sacerdotti

Coordinated Transit and Land Use Planning in the Region of Waterloo

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

ENVISIONING OUR CITY: 2041 PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 November 16, 2017

Neighbourhood Planning in Haringey. Myddleton Road Strategic Group 7 th November 2013

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

Population Profiles

Shaping Your Neighbourhood

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Whither Regionalism: The Salience of Megaregional Geographies for Inter-Metropolitan Planning and Policy Making

Planning for Economic and Job Growth

Effects of a non-motorized transport infrastructure development in the Bucharest metropolitan area

The Tampa Bay Catastrophic Plan Presentation to CFGIS Users Group FDOT District 5 Urban Offices - Orlando July 30, 2010

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

Dublin Chamber submission on Dublin City Development Plan : Outdoor Advertising Strategy

Mapping and Health Equity Advocacy

Alternatives Analysis

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

ONE REGION: PLANNING FOR A STRONG AND JUST METROPOLIS. NYLON # 14: Regional Planning. October 31, 2018

Assessing the Vulnerability of Tennessee Transportation Assets to Extreme Weather

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

Development of modal split modeling for Chennai

NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. Fair Housing & Equity Assessment & Regional Planning Enhancement

APPENDIX V VALLEYWIDE REPORT

Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Geospatial Technology and Innovation

The Role of Transitways in Our Region s Economic Competitiveness. The 23rd CTS Annual Research Conference St. Paul, MN May 23, 2012

European spatial policy and regionalised approaches

An Assessment of People, Place and Business on Syracuse s Near Northside

OREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM

The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of Government, Topography and Markets

Briefing. H.E. Mr. Gyan Chandra Acharya

38th UNWTO Affiliate Members Plenary Session Yerevan, Armenia, 4 October 2016

An online data and consulting resource of THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO THE JACK FORD URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER

Victorian Liveability Indicator Program: Definition, Measurement and Application

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

Low Density Areas : Places of Opportunity. Enrique Garcilazo, OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development

Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities

Tackling urban sprawl: towards a compact model of cities? David Ludlow University of the West of England (UWE) 19 June 2014

Economic Geography of the Long Island Region

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Technical Team August 23, 2007

Is better access key to inclusive cities? Making urban areas accessible

Requests to Alberta Government Departments, Agencies, Boards and Commissions. April 1, 2010 March 31, 2011

Economic and Social Council

Identifying Megaregions in the US: Implications for Infrastructure Investment

Measuring Disaster Risk for Urban areas in Asia-Pacific

Transportation and Social Equity as a Way to Alleviate Poverty

Measuring connectivity in London

Leveraging Urban Mobility Strategies to Improve Accessibility and Productivity of Cities

THE ROLE OF REGIONAL SPATIAL PLANNING IN SUPPORTING LONG-TERM ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTHERN IRELAND

accessibility accessibility by-pass bid-rent curve bridging point administrative centre How easy or difficult a place is to reach.

ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES IN REGIONS AND CITIES: MEASURES AND POLICIES NOTE FOR THE WPTI WORKSHOP, 18 JUNE 2013

Transcription:

What is the Regional Transit Engagement Series? As one of the fastest growing regions in the country, there is recognition that long-term transit planning efforts should be accelerated if we are to remain a leading, competitive region nationally and globally. In fact, transportation choice emerged as a top growth priority from the three-year, 14-county, bi-state planning process known as CONNECT Our Future. As a component of transportation choice, communities of all sizes, urban to rural, were eager to talk about regional transit in terms of transportation, economic access and mobility, economic development, and place making. The Regional Transit Public Engagement Series is a continuation of this dialogue; an opportunity to have a focused conversation about regional transit, well before any planning takes place. This is an opportunity for communities to express their aspirations, concerns, values, and interests around long-term transit. Who is Involved and When? The project area includes Mecklenburg County and the North Carolina counties immediately adjacent to Mecklenburg. In South Carolina, the project area includes the urbanized portions of both Lancaster and York counties (the area within the Rock Hill/Fort Mill Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization s boundaries). Forums will be held in each participating county to gather input on regional transit needs, values, concerns, and aspirations. Initial meetings will take place in the spring of 2017, and will include municipal and county managers, transit directors, transportation planners, and planning directors. During the summer and early fall, a second set of county meetings will include local, state, and federal elected officials, economic development organizations, private sector interests, institutional leaders (hospitals, colleges, etc.), and key state and federal government staff. In addition, a public survey will invite residents to provide their thoughts on the future of transit in their community. In the fall, we will highlight findings and consensus based next steps during a regional transit summit. 1

Why Now? Demographers, developers, and real estate officials at the national and state levels agree: our region s population will continue to grow and we must provide the infrastructure, mobility, jobs, businesses, and services to match. Forecasters anticipate 4.24 million people will call the greater Charlotte region home by 2050 an increase of 74% from 2010. Nearly doubling population in the region between 2000 and 2050 could significantly increase the consumption of farmland and open space, spread out our population and the area where services and infrastructure must be provided, producing an array of undesired consequences: expensive utility expansion, increased traffic congestion with longer commutes to work, overcrowded schools, loss of working farms and degradation of environmental resources. All of these factors work together to degrade our national and global economic competitiveness. With these facts in mind, Transportation Choice was the 2 nd highest mentioned community or regional challenge identified by residents during the CONNECT Our Future project. Specifically, coordinating transportation issues, including freight planning and transit readiness, was listed as the top infrastructure priority. 2

Why Transportation Choice? Residents across the region have indicated that transportation choices are important to their quality of life, wallets, and health. Over 50% of the region s workforce lives in one county and works in another. Transportation choice allows residents housing and lifestyle choices. According to the Locational Affordability Index developed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), median income families in communities throughout the greater Charlotte region spend as much as 41% of their annual income on transportation costs. A development pattern that is conducive to walking and biking also promotes daily physical activity, provides vibrant activity centers, and allows for future transit service. Access to alternative forms of transportation, including transit, can improve air quality by reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled. By thinking through regional transit topics now and soliciting feedback from residents, we ll be able to harness the best the future has to offer, while still preserving all of the things that make our existing communities great. How Does This Relate to Other Projects? While there are multiple regional initiatives and plans that address transportation, economic development, and growth, there seems to be alignment on several key issues with consistent goals that focus on: 3

Economic growth and competitiveness, Developing region-wide systems and transportation infrastructure, and Transportation choice, multi-modal options, and the importance of mobility. The following plans and initiatives address growth, transportation infrastructure, and economic development. CONNECT Our Future is a 14-county, bi-state regional planning process that developed regionwide growth priorities. Priorities included transportation and housing choice, economic growth, and walkable centers connected by regional transit. The four Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the Charlotte region are in the process of developing their 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plans (MTPs) focused on multi-modal transportation infrastructure, including transit. The Greater Charlotte Region Freight Mobility Plan addresses transportation infrastructure and policy improvements needed to increase efficiency of freight movement. The Charlotte Area Transit System s (CATS) 2030 System Plan outlines future transit corridors and modes and will be influenced by results of the engagement series. CATS current planning initiatives include: o Blue Line Extension construction (Charlotte to UNC Charlotte) o Silver Line light rail planning (Charlotte to Matthews/Union County) o Gold Line Streetcar construction (Charlotte to West Charlotte) o Red Line corridor planning (Charlotte to Huntersville, Cornelius, Davidson and Iredell County) o Airport Corridor light rail planning (Charlotte to Airport and Gaston County) o Envision My Ride initiative to study current bus routes and frequency. The Charlotte Regional Partnership, the Charlotte Chamber, and the Centralina Economic Development Department coordinate on the development of regional economic development strategies that include goals for transporting the workforce within and through the region. How Will Results Be Used? The results of the transit engagement will inform the CATS 2030 plan update and any future regional transit planning, can aid in local planning efforts, and can inform future Metropolitan Transportation Plans and the region s economic development strategy. Input received during the regional transit engagement series will be used to determine important next steps for our region. Are there near-term coordination efforts that would improve transportation efficiency between transit systems? Are there strategies that would support mobility for seniors, veterans, and persons with disabilities? Is there interest in planning for regional transit across county lines? Are there communities that are ready to develop transit oriented activity centers for economic development purposes? Are there counties that would like to participate in a regional transit planning initiative? 4

How Can I Find Out More? This process provides an opportunity to ask questions and become more informed about transit opportunities. Your feedback will be used to determine consensus based next steps for the region. A project webpage has been created to keep you up to date on regional meetings, provide resource materials, and other opportunities to be involved, including a public survey. Go to www.centralina.org/tbd. If you would like to request a presentation for your organization or group, contact Jason Wager at Centralina Council of Government at JWager@centralina.org or Jason Lawrence at Charlotte Area Transit System at JLawrence@ci.charlotte.nc.us. You can also follow Centralina Planning and CATS on social media. John Muth Deputy Director, CATS jmuth@charlottenc.gov 704-336-3373 Michelle Nance Planning Director, Centralina COG mnance@centralina.org 704-348-2709 Jason Lawrence Transportation Planner, CATS jlawrence@charlottenc.gov 704-336-4106 Jason Wager Planning Program Supervisor, Centralina COG jwager@centralina.org 704-348-2707 5