Preview of Structural Use of Glass in Buildings Second Edition By Chris O Regan BEng(Hons) CEng MIStructE

Similar documents

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

Experimental Research on the Shear Behavior of Laminated Glass with PVB Film Under Different Temperature

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

QUESTION BANK Composite Materials

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

ISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

ADVANCED DESIGN OF GLASS STRUCTURES

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

For more Stuffs Visit Owner: N.Rajeev. R07

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Sample Question Paper

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

ELASTOPLASTIC STEEL BEAM BENDING ANALYSIS BY USING ABAQUS

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

A CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR MODELLING END-PLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE


KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

ESE TOPICWISE OBJECTIVE SOLVED PAPER I

ME 202 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS SPRING 2014 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS

7 Vlasov torsion theory

Special edition paper

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

STRUCTURAL SURFACES & FLOOR GRILLAGES

9-3. Structural response

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Unit Workbook 1 Level 4 ENG U8 Mechanical Principles 2018 UniCourse Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Sample

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.

Using the Timoshenko Beam Bond Model: Example Problem

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

2 marks Questions and Answers

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

Entrance exam Master Course

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7

Hygrothermal stresses in laminates

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

SCALING EFFECTS IN THE LOW VELOCITY IMPACT RESPONSE OF FIBRE METAL

CIVIL ENGINEERING

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Measurement of Bone Strength and Stiffness using 3-Point Bending

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

The stiffness of plates

9.5 Compression Members

COPPER FOR BUSBARS CHAPTER 4: SHORT-CIRCUIT EFFECTS

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

DETAILED SYLLABUS FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION. Diploma. (Three Years Semester Scheme) Diploma in Architecture (DARC)


Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition Autar K Kaw University of South Florida, Tampa, USA

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

Chapter Two: Mechanical Properties of materials

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

The aims of this experiment were to obtain values for Young s modulus and Poisson s ratio for

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

8 Deflectionmax. = 5WL 3 384EI

Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates

14. LS-DYNA Forum 2016

Composite models 30 and 131: Ply types 0 and 8 calibration

Direct (and Shear) Stress

Structural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION

DESIGN FOR FATIGUE STRENGTH

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

TECHNICAL REPORT. Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws.

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

3.032 Problem Set 2 Solutions Fall 2007 Due: Start of Lecture,

Physical Properties Testing Technical Bulletin

Tutorial #1 - CivE. 205 Name: I.D:

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

National Exams May 2015

2. Determine the deflection at C of the beam given in fig below. Use principal of virtual work. W L/2 B A L C

COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5

Rigid and Braced Frames

3.032 Problem Set 1 Fall 2007 Due: Start of Lecture,

Transcription:

Worked example for floor plate design A glass floor plate is to be installed that sits over a basement. The support is via a steel frame with a 1.5m x 1.5m grillage of beams. This frame provides a continuous support and the following analysis and design of the glass floor plate provisionally assumes it to be infinitely stiff. The following calculation determines the thickness of the glass required for the floor plate. The below floor loadings are typical for domestic use and should be used for design: Characteristic variable action q k = 1.5kN/m Characteristic point action Q k=.0kn The glass will not be sandblasted and will be enamelled on the wearing side. This will not impact on the design of the glass as the enamelling is on the compression side of the floor plate. The glass is to be made up of three layers of glass laminated with PVB, It is assumed that the top sheet will be toughened and not included in the stress calculations although will be considered for deflection. To provide the most effective post breakage behaviour the lower two sheets will be heat strengthened. Two action durations apply: permanent and short. Permanent action condition Determine design strength of glass using Appendix C. f g;d = k modk sp f g;k γ M:A + k v(f b;k - f g;k ) γ M:v For load duration > 50 years, k mod = 0.9 k mod = 0.9, k sp = 1.0,f g;k=45 N/mm f b;k = 70N/mm, k v = 1.0, γ M:A = 1.6 and γ M:v = 1.. f g;d = 0.9 1.0 45N/mm 1.6 + 1.0(70N/mm - 45N/mm ) 1. = 9N/mm Variable action condition i.e. short duration load For load duration of 5 hours, for pedestrian action; k mod = 0.60 f g;d = 0.60 1.0 45N/mm + 1.0(70N/mm - 45N/mm ) 1.6 1. = 7.7N/mm Page 1

Determine the effective thickness of the glass required based on design strength Try two 1mm thick plies and one 1mm thick sacrificial ply. The laminate is a PVB based material and is 0.76mm thick. In order to calculate the effective thickness of the glass pane, the shear interaction between the plies of the laminated glass via the PVB interlayer must be accounted for. The simplified method of determining stress of glass within each ply is as follows. The effective thickness of the glass when considering deflection due to bending is: h ef;w = h k + 1ω h k h m,k k i where: h k h m,k is the thickness of each ply is the distance between the middle of the ply to the centre of the laminated glass pane. When calculating stress the equivalent thickness is calculated from: where: h j h m,j h ef;σ;j= h ef;w h j + ωh m;j is the thickness of each ply is the distance between the middle of the ply to the centre of the laminated glass pane. Assuming a value of 0.1 for ω when considering variable actions and 0 when assessing effects due to permanent actions, two effective thicknesses need to be calculated. Effective thickness in permanent action condition The effective thickness of the laminated glass with respect to permanent action is as follows: h ef;w = 1 mm + 1 mm = 15.1mm Note that the variable ω equates to 0 hence it is not included in the calculation. Additionally the toughened glass top ply is not included when determining the overall depth of the glass as it is considered to be sacrificial. Effective thickness in Variable Action Condition The effective thickness of the laminated glass with respect to variable action is as follows: h ef;w = 1 mm + 1 mm + 1 0.1 (1mm 6.4 mm + 1mm 6.4 = 16.7mm mm) This is the effective thickness of the laminated glass that is to be used for deflection calculations. The effective thickness of the laminated glass for bending stress is as follows: 16. 7 h ef;σ;j= mm 1mm + 0.1 6.4mm = 18.7mm Page

Note how the thickness has increased from 15.1mm to 16.7mm due to the inclusion of shear interaction within the PVB based interlayer, which is then increased to 18.7mm when calculating stress Bending stress check There are two action conditions to check for: permanent and variable (short). With respect to the permanent condition, the following applies: Permanent Actions due to self-weight = 0.06m x 5kN/m = 0.9kN/m (Note this includes the 1mm thick toughened glass top ply which is not included when determining the effective thickness of the glass.) Partial factor for permanent action γ q=1.5 UDL ult = 0.9kN/m x γ g = 0.9kN/m x 1.5 = 1.kN/m The applied bending stress to the plate during the permanent condition is defined in Table 11.4 of Roark s Formulas for Stress and Strain 8 th Edition as: σ max = βqb h ef;w, β = 0.87 The β variable is dependent upon the ratio of geometry of the plate. In this instance the ratio of the dimensions of the plate is 1; therefore β = 0.87 σ max = 0.87 1.kN/m 1.5 m 0.0187 m.n/mm < 9N/mm OK = 5kN/m The applied bending stress to the plate during the variable action condition is: 1.kN/m + 1.5 kn/m x γ q = 1.kN/m + 1.5 kn/m x 1.5 =.47kN/m There are two effects to consider for the variable action condition: that of the UDL and the point load. UDL σ max = 0.87.47kN/m 1.5 m 0.0187 m 6.4N/mm < 7.7N/mm OK Concentrated point action = 6408kN/m The area over which the action is applied is 50mm x 50mm = 500mm equivalent circle area radius o r =r 0 if r 0 0.5t r 0 = 500mm π Bending stress at point of concentrated load: = 8.mm σ = W πh ef;σ;j (1 + v) ln b πr 0 + β Page

Where: W is the design concentrated point action v is Poisson s Ratio β is a variable that is dependent upon the ratio of geometry of the plate. See Table 11.4 of Roark s Formulas for Stress and Strain 8 th Edition. In this instance the ratio of the dimensions of the plate equate to 1, therefore β=0.45 Partial factor for variable concentrated action γ Q=1.5 000N 1.5 1500mm σ point load = 18.7 (1 + 0.) ln mm π 8.mm + 0.45 = 9.1N/mm 9.1N/mm < 7.7N/mm OK Deflection check It Is safe to assume all three panels of glass participate in restricting deflection Equivalent thickness of layers is as follows: 1 mm + 1 mm + 1 h ef;w = mm + 1 0.1 (1mm = 1.5mm 1.8 mm + 1mm 0mm + 1.8 mm + 1mm 1.8 mm) Equivalent I value = 1500m 1.5 mm 1 = 1497mm 4 Taking the point load as the worst case condition: Serviceability state deflection = 000N 1500 mm 48 70000N/mm 1497mm 4 =.4mm Assuming a span/depth ratio of 50, the maximum allowable deflection is 6mm >.4mm therefore the floor plate passes both serviceability and strength checks. Post-failure check As all three sheets of glass could fail the only truly reliable test for the proposed design is to undergo physical testing of the design to confirm its suitability. Some schools of thought suggest a design method where one sheet is assumed to remain intact. This can offer some measure of comfort but does not cover the case where all three sheets are broken. This approach is illustrated below. Two action durations apply: permanent and short. Permanent action condition The strength of the glass is the same for the intact floor plate. Bending stress check Page 4

In the post-failure condition there remain the two action conditions to check for: permanent and variable (short). With respect to the permanent condition, the following applies: Actions are similar to intact condition i.e. 0.9 kn/m Partial factor for permanent action γ g=1.0 due to accidental condition UDL ult = 0.9kN/m x γ g = 0.9kN/m x 1.00 = 0.9kN/m When taking into account the two way spanning action of the floor plate, the applied bending stress to the plate during the permanent condition is: σ max = βqb, β = 0.87 h ef:w σ max = 0.87 0.9kN/m 1.5 m 0.01 = 406kN/m m 4.0N/mm < 9.0N/mm OK The applied bending stress to the plate during the variable action, short duration condition is: Partial factor for varible action γ q=1.0 due to accidental condition UDL ult = 0.9kN/m + 1.5kN/m x γ q = 0.9kN/m + 1.5kN/m x 1.0 =.4kN/m There are two effects to consider for the variable action condition: that of the UDL and point load. UDL σ max = 0.87.4kN/m 1.5 m 0.01 m 10.8N/mm < 7.7N/mm OK Point load check = 1076kN/m Although this is an accidental condition, the point load check still applies. Partial factor for variable concentrated action γ Q=1.0 000N 1.0 1500mm σ concentrated action = π 1 (1 + 0.) ln + 0.45 = 47.1N/mm mm π 8.mm 47.1N/mm > 7.7N/mm fails If the two bottom sheets remain as 14 mm and the top sheet is dropped to 8mm then the overall thickness will remain the same and the stress calculated above will reduce to 4.6N/mm, which is within the allowable design bending stress. No deflection check required as it is a post-failure condition. The overall thickness of the glass is 7.5mm, which correlates closely to the span/depth ratio of 40. Page 5