An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

Similar documents
Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

General Exam Part II, Fall 1998 Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum

Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ.

The Particle-Field Hamiltonian

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws!

COMPLETE ALL ROUGH WORKINGS IN THE ANSWER BOOK AND CROSS THROUGH ANY WORK WHICH IS NOT TO BE ASSESSED.

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

Hamiltonian Dynamics from Lie Poisson Brackets

Complex Numbers. The set of complex numbers can be defined as the set of pairs of real numbers, {(x, y)}, with two operations: (i) addition,

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

Quantization of scalar fields

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

= 0. = q i., q i = E

Physical Dynamics (PHY-304)

Translation versus Momentum and Rotation versus Angular Momentum

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Quantization of the E-M field

An introduction to Birkhoff normal form

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

Physical Dynamics (SPA5304) Lecture Plan 2018

Physics 106b: Lecture 7 25 January, 2018

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Hamilton-Jacobi theory

4. Complex Oscillations

2 Canonical quantization

Quantization of Scalar Field


4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Simple one-dimensional potentials

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

Chaotic motion. Phys 420/580 Lecture 10

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 2009

Lecture Notes 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics

Phonons and lattice dynamics

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.

Lecture 4. Alexey Boyarsky. October 6, 2015

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 8 Mar 1995

Analytical Mechanics for Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 5

Approximation Methods in QM

Robotics, Geometry and Control - Rigid body motion and geometry

STABILITY. Phase portraits and local stability

Problem 1: Step Potential (10 points)

PHYS2330 Intermediate Mechanics Fall Final Exam Tuesday, 21 Dec 2010

Lecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7

(a) Sections 3.7 through (b) Sections 8.1 through 8.3. and Sections 8.5 through 8.6. Problem Set 4 due Monday, 10/14/02

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Physics 342 Lecture 27. Spin. Lecture 27. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Chemistry 532 Practice Final Exam Fall 2012 Solutions

Theoretical physics. Deterministic chaos in classical physics. Martin Scholtz

Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain

Assignment 6. Using the result for the Lagrangian for a double pendulum in Problem 1.22, we get

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

M3-4-5 A16 Notes for Geometric Mechanics: Oct Nov 2011

Seminar 6: COUPLED HARMONIC OSCILLATORS

Math 1302, Week 8: Oscillations

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

7 Planar systems of linear ODE

Statistical Mechanics Solution Set #1 Instructor: Rigoberto Hernandez MoSE 2100L, , (Dated: September 4, 2014)

Quantum Mechanics: Vibration and Rotation of Molecules

Chaos in Hamiltonian systems

Damped harmonic oscillator with time-dependent frictional coefficient and time-dependent frequency. Abstract

Differential Equations and Modeling

Question 1: A particle starts at rest and moves along a cycloid whose equation is. 2ay y a

Topics in Representation Theory: Cultural Background

Classical mechanics of particles and fields

Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

PH 610/710-2A: Advanced Classical Mechanics I. Fall Semester 2007

FINAL EXAM GROUND RULES

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors: An Introduction

L = 1 2 a(q) q2 V (q).

Lie 2-algebras from 2-plectic geometry

221B Lecture Notes on Resonances in Classical Mechanics

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

E = φ 1 A The dynamics of a particle with mass m and charge q is determined by the Hamiltonian

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

P321(b), Assignement 1

Canonical Quantization

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

Two-Body Problem. Central Potential. 1D Motion

Transcription:

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem The most famous n-body problem is one where particles interact by an inverse square-law force. However, there is a class of exactly solvable n-body problems in which interactions are harmonic. In this section a Lie-algebraic method is illustrated by treating a solvable 3-body problem. Lagrange s equations of motion are so, defining canonical momentum d L L = 0 () dt ẋ i x i p i = L ẋ i, the Hamiltonian H(x, p, t) = p i ẋ i L i is a function of phase-space coordinates x and p. In general, one has 2n coordinates, x = {x,..., x n } and p = {p,..., p n }. This allows one to obtain Hamilton s Canonical Equations: ẋ i = H p i, ṗ i = H x i. (2) The time derivative of any function A( x, p ) of phase-space coordinates is da dt = n i= ( A ẋ i + A ) ṗ i x i p i So, following the sign convention of Perelomov [], one can define the Poisson bracket between any two functions of phase-space variables A and B [ A, B ] = ( A B B ) A. (3) p i i x i p i x i. So using Eqs. (2) and (3), da dt is the bracket of the Hamiltonian H with A da dt = [ H, A ].

If [ H, A ] = 0, then A is a constant of the motion, or a conserved quantity. The Poisson bracket is another example of a Lie bracket [ x, y ] which, as the reader will recall, has three main properties:. [x, y] = [y, x] -antisymmetry 2. [x + αy, z] = [x, z] + α[y, z] -linearity 3. [[x, y], z] + [[y, z], x] + [[z, x], y] = 0 -Jacobi identity As noted before, a Lie algebra is an algebra with a Lie bracket product. Mechanics concerns the Lie algebra A over C generated by functions of the phase space variables including the Hamiltonian function, with the Poisson bracket as the product. (So it is infinite dimensional.) The Poisson bracket has the following additional property: [x, yz] = y[x, z] + [x, y]z -Leibniz rule. The Three Body Problem: The three-body problem involves three particles, interacting with each other via harmonic forces. I choose these particles to have equal masses in order not to obscure the important points of the following discussion with inessential details. Thus, m = m 2 = m 3 = m, which have respective positions r, r 2, and r 3. (Here harmonic forces are forces associated with harmonic motion, where the Hamiltonian is of quadratic form.) There are three particles in this problem each with three degrees of freedom, corresponding to six phase space coordinates. Also, there is an external force similar to the force caused by a magnetic field acting on moving charges. (The actual magnetic force is not considered, since if the origin of the force were actually through electric charge, there would also be mutual electric repulsion of inverse square type, rendering the problem unsolvable.) So, the potential energy is V ( r) = k ( r α r β ) 2, 2 α β where k is like a spring constant. This potential leads to a homogeneous quadratic Hamiltonian, so that the motion is governed by a set of linear 2

homogenous differential equations with constant coefficients. This is what makes the problem exactly solvable. The Hamiltonian is H = 2m 3 p α q A c 2 + 2 α = α β k ( r α r β 2 ), (4) where again the symmetric vector potential A = Bo (xŷ yˆx) is chosen. The 2 total angular momentum L is ( ) L = ( r 3 + r 2 + r 3 ) ( p + p 2 + p 3 ). (5) In order to solve the problem, it is helpful, as usual, to identify the conserved quantities. Due to the magnetic field, the vector L is not conserved. However, since B is parallel to the z-axis, the problem is invariant with respect to rotation about this axis. Recall Nöther s theorem states that to each symmetry of the the Lagrangian corresponds a conserved quantity of the system. This guarantees that L z is conserved. Also, one finds that the z-components L αβz of the relative angular momentum vector of two particles α and β with respect to one another is conserved L αβ = ( r β r α ) ( p β p α ). (6) Finally, the z-component of the total linear momentum vector of the system is also conserved p z = (p z + p 2z + p 3z ). (7) Thus, in Poisson bracket notation [ H, L z ] = 0, [ H, L αβz ] = 0, [ H, p z ] = 0. (8) Consider first A, the finite dimensional sub-algebra of A generated by H and the 2n phase space variables. All of the elements such that the bracket between any two gives zero, form a sub Lie algebra of A which is the Cartan sub-algebra. In the three-body problem, the Cartan sub-algebra contains five elements L z, L 2z, p z,, and H. As usual, a linear combination of all the basis elements of the algebra A can be constructed such that it is an eigenvector of the Poisson bracket operation with each generator of the Cartan sub-algebra {K}, including the Hamiltonian. One defines the set of 8-dimensional phase-space coordinates as ξ = {ξ, ξ 2,..., ξ 8 } = {x, y, z, x 2,..., p 3y, p 3z }. 3

Thus, an eigenvector of adk (where k K) constructed from combinations of ξ is of the form 8 u = a k ξ k, k = where {a k } are complex coefficients to be determined. Thus, as before, treat the set of generators ξ = {ξ, ξ 2,..., ξ 8 } as a basis of independent vectors and compare coefficients. In this way, one determines what the coefficients must be in order to form, for example, an eigenvector of the eigenvalue equation [ H, u α ] = λ α u α. (9) In other words, the motivation here is to solve the differential equation u = λu, with elementary solutions that have exponential time dependence u(t) = u(0)e λt (since, again, this is a set of linear homogeneous DE s with constant coefficients). This differential equation describes the motion of u throughout time. Since u is a linear combination of the phase-space coordinates of the system, the solutions will allow one to find the position and momentum of each particle at any given time. Using the oscillator frequency ω o and cyclotron frequency ω b ω o = k m and making the substitution ω b = qb o 2mc, Ω = ω b2 + 3ω o2, there are two roots that appear in the solution to the eigenvalue equation, Eq.(9), namely r = ω b + Ω and r + = ω b + Ω. Therefore, solving the set of DE s, for the Hamiltonian alone, one obtains the following table of eigenvalues and eigenvectors: 4

λ eigenvector. 0 u = p z + p z2 + p z3 2. 0 u 2 = p y + p y2 + p y3 + mx ω b + mx 2 ω b + mx 3 ω b 3. 0 u 3 = p x + p x2 + p x3 my ω b my 2 ω b my 3 ω b 4. 0 u 4 = z + z 2 + z 3 (generalized) 5. 2iω b u 5 = p y + p y2 + p y3 i(p x + p x2 + p x3 ) mω b [(x + x 2 + x 3 ) + i(y + y 2 + y 3 )] 6. 2iω b u 6 = p y + p y2 + p y3 + i(p x + p x2 + p x3 ) mω b [(x + x 2 + x 3 ) i(y + y 2 + y 3 )] 7. i 3ω o u 7 = p z3 p z + i 3mω o (z z 3 ) 8. i 3ω o u 8 = p z2 p z + i 3mω o (z z 2 ) 9. i 3ω o u 9 = p z3 p z i 3mω o (z z 3 ) 0. i 3ω o u 0 = p z2 p z i 3mω o (z z 2 ). ir + u = p y3 p y i(p x3 p x ) + mω(x x 3 ) + imω(y y 3 ) 2. ir + u 2 = p y2 p y i(p x2 p x ) + mω(x x 2 ) + imω(y y 2 ) 3. ir + u 3 = p y3 p y + i(p x3 p x ) + mω(x x 3 ) imω(y y 3 ) 4. ir + u 4 = p y2 p y + i(p x2 p x ) + mω(x x 2 ) imω(y y 2 ) 5. ir u 5 = p y3 p y + i(p x3 p x ) mω(x x 3 ) + imω(y y 3 ) 6. ir u 6 = p y2 p y + i(p x2 p x ) mω(x x 2 ) + imω(y y 2 ) 7. ir u 7 = p y3 p y i(p x3 p x ) mω(x x 3 ) imω(y y 3 ) 8. ir u 8 = p y2 p y i(p x2 p x ) mω(x x 2 ) imω(y y 2 ) 5

Physically, the eigenvectors {u α } correspond to the normal mode coordinates of the three-mass system, providing those solutions to the motion that have exponential time dependence. Each eigenvector defines a mode of the system, the frequency of which is given by the corresponding eigenvalue λ = iω o. From the table, it is clear that in the 3-body problem, the eigenvectors appear in complex conjugate pairs. These pairs each correspond to two possible motions, both of which have the same frequency. Complete solutions to the equations of motion for this system involve combinations of the normal modes weighted with appropriate amplitude and phase factors [2]. A solution to the physical motion of the system is the real or imaginary part of the complex conjugate combination. From Table I (of solutions to Eq.(9)), it is clear that the problem decouples into xy and z parts. Thus, the Hamiltonian can be rewritten as H = ( (p 2 xα + p 2 2m yα) 2q ) c L zα + q2 c 2 (A2 xα + A 2 yα) + 2 α β α k ( x αˆx y α ŷ x β ˆx y β ŷ ) 2 + 2m p 2 zα + k( z α ẑ z β ẑ ) 2. 2 The motion along the z-axis is completely determined by eigenvectors u, u 4, u 7, u 8, u 9, and u 0. The eigenvector u corresponds to a translational mode along the z-axis, unaffected by the field. The eigenvectors u 7, u 8, u 9, and u 0 describe an oscillatory motion of two particles with respect to a third, confined to the z-axis moving with oscillator frequency ±ω o. The motion corresponding to the vector u 4 does not have an exponential solution. This vector is a generalized eigenvector of order greater than one. The occurrence of this generalized eigenvector means the entire Lie algebra fails to be semisimple. This adds unnecessary complication to the analysis of the problem. Thus, for simplicity, I consider only the xy portion in the following discussion. Motivated by the desire to construct raising and lowering operators for this system in the corresponding quantum mechanical problem (see section I), one looks for a set of eigenvectors that satisfy simultaneously the eigenvalue α α β 6

equations corresponding to all of the elements in the Cartan subalgebra [ H, u α ] = λ α u α, [ L z, u α ] = γ α u α, [ L 2z, u α ] = µ α u α. (0) In order to construct such a set of eigenvectors, start by obtaining solutions to the eigenvalue equation corresponding to L z by the same method as was employed for H. Then, collect the eigenvectors {u α } degenerate in both λ and γ. Finally, combine these degenerate eigenvectors into linear combinations v β = α a β α u α to form the desired set {v β } of vectors that satisfy the entire system. (The coefficient a may be zero.) In the process, one finds twelve ladder operators for the spectrum listed in Table II. 7

Table II λ γ µ operators. 0 i 0 v 2 = p y + p y2 + p y3 + mω b (x + x 2 + x 3 ) i(p x + p x2 + p x3 mω b (y + y 2 + y 3 )) 2. 0 i 0 v 3 = p y + p y2 + p y3 + mω b (x + x 2 + x 3 ) +i(p x + p x2 + p x3 mω b (y + y 2 + y 3 )) 3. 2iω b i 0 v 5 = i(p x + p x2 + p x3 ) + p y + p y2 + p y3 mω b ((x + x 2 + x 3 ) + i(y + y 2 + y 3 )) 4. 2iω b i 0 v 6 = i(p x + p x2 + p x3 ) + p y + p y2 + p y3 mω b ((x + x 2 + x 3 ) i(y + y 2 + y 3 )) 5. i(ω b + Ω) 0 0 v = i(p x + p x2 2p x3 ) + p y + p y2 2p y3 mω((x + x 2 2x 3 ) + i(y + y 2 2y 3 )) 6. i(ω b + Ω) 0 2i v 2 = i(p x p x2 ) p y + p y2 +mω((x x 2 ) + i(y y 2 )) 7. i(ω b + Ω) 0 0 v 3 = i(p x + p x2 2p x3 ) + p y + p y2 2p y3 mω((x + x 2 2x 3 ) i(y + y 2 2y 3 )) 8. i(ω b + Ω) 0 2i v 4 = i(p x p x2 ) p y + p y2 +mω((x x 2 ) i(y y 2 )) 9. i(ω ω b ) 0 0 v 5 = i(p x + p x2 2p x3 ) + p y + p y2 2p y3 +mω((x + x 2 2x 3 ) i(y + y 2 2y 3 )) 0. i(ω ω b ) 0 2i v 6 = i(p x p x2 ) p y + p y2 +mω((x 2 x ) + i(y y 2 )). i(ω ω b ) 0 0 v 7 = i(p x + p x2 2p x3 ) + p y + p y2 2p y3 +mω((x + x 2 2x 3 ) + i(y + y 2 2y 3 )) 2. i(ω ω b ) 0 2i v 8 = i(p x p x2 ) p y + p y2 +mω((x 2 x 2 ) i(y y 2 )) 8

Once one has the list of eigenvectors which satisfy by all of the bracket relations simultaneously, Eq.(0), the Hamiltonian can be rewritten in terms of these vectors. Classically, these eigenvectors are the elementary solutions of the system. The new eigenvectors of the total system appear in complex conjugate pairs v 2 = v v 4 = v3 v 7 = v5 v 8 = v6 v = v9 v 2 = v0 With this in mind, the Hamiltonian of the system becomes: H xy = 24mΩ 2 [ ω 2 b v 9 v 9 + 3ω 2 b v 0 v 0 + 4ω 2 b v 3 v 3 ω b Ωv 9 v 9 3ω b Ωv 0 v 0+ ω b (Ω + ω b )v 5 v 5 + 3ω b (Ω + ω b )v 6 v 6 + 3ω 2 o(v 5 v 5 + 3v 6 v 6 + v 9 v 9 + 3v 0 v 0 + 4v 3 v 3) ]. Converting each of the phase-space coordinates into combinations of the eigenvectors {v β }, one obtains Table III. As was the case with the raising and lowering operators in section I, these elementary solutions with exponential time dependence can be used to determine the motion of the system corresponding to each mode. (To make this a quantum mechanical problem, the Hamiltonian must be rewritten in terms of symmetrized combinations of the eigenvectors 2 α v αv α + v αv α.) In order to trace out this motion, begin by collecting the appropriate elementary solutions. For example when analyzing the mode corresponding to frequency λ = (ω b + Ω), one must form linear combinations of the elementary solutions v, v 2, v 3, and v 4. When combined properly, these elementary solutions lead to real functions, which constitute actual motion. So, including the proper time dependence, v α = c α e λαt (α =, 2,..., 8), one can graph the motion of each particle as a function of time. Therefore, the coefficients c α are the initial conditions of the system v(t) = v(0) e λ αt. In this way, the entire path of each particle is determined over all time. A 2-D parametric plot of the motion corresponding to each mode of the system is shown in Figure. From fig., it is clear that the solutions v 5 and v 6 represent a mode of the system in which all three particles move in a circle 9

about the center of mass. Analysis of initial conditions for this mode reveals that all three particles begin at the same position on the x or y axis, and move in unison around the circle. The mode corresponding to solutions v, v 2, v 3, and v 4 is slightly more complicated. There are a number of possible situations for motion in this mode, depending on the initial conditions given. The final oscillatory mode in the xy plane is determined by elementary solutions v 5, v 6, v 7, and v 8. From the figure, it is clear that this mode is characterized by the same motion as was displayed for the previous mode. The only difference is in the angular frequency of rotation and the direction of motion. The final mode corresponding to xy motion of the particles (not included in the figure) is the zero frequency mode given by solutions v 2 and v 3. Here, the particles are stationary relative to each other throughout time, only translating in the xy plane effected by the magnetic field. All possible motion of this system can be described by appropriate linear combinations of these normal mode solutions. Thus, by analyzing the elementary solutions that satisfy the entire Cartan subalgebra (Eq.(0)) simultaneously, one can solve this harmonic 3-body problem completely. 0

Table III x 24mω b Ω (ω b(v + 3v 2 + v 3 + 3v 4 v 5 3v 6 v 7 3v 8 ) +2Ω(v 2 + v 3 v 5 v 6 )) x 2 24mω b Ω (ω b(v 3v 2 + v 3 3v 4 v 5 + 3v 6 v 7 + 3v 8 ) +2Ω(v 2 + v 3 v 5 v 6 )) x 3 2mω b Ω (ω b( v v 3 + v 5 + v 7 ) +Ω(v 2 + v 3 v 5 v 6 )) y y 2 y 3 p x p x2 p x3 i (ω 24mω b Ω b(v + 3v 2 v 3 3v 4 + v 5 + 3v 6 v 7 3v 8 ) +2Ω(v 2 v 3 v 5 + v 6 )) i (ω 24mω b Ω b(v 3v 2 v 3 + 3v 4 + v 5 3v 6 v 7 + 3v 8 ) +2Ω(v 2 v 3 v 5 + v 6 )) i (ω 2mω b Ω b( v + v 3 v 5 + v 7 ) +Ω(v 2 v 3 v 5 + v 6 )) i 24 (v + 3v 2 v 3 3v 4 v 5 3v 6 + v 7 + 3v 8 2v 2 + 2v 3 2v 5 + 2v 6 ) i 24 (v 3v 2 v 3 + 3v 4 v 5 + 3v 6 + v 7 3v 8 2v 2 + 2v 3 2v 5 + 2v 6 ) i (v 2 v 3 v 5 + v 7 + v 2 v 3 + v 5 v 6 ) p y 24 ( v 3v 2 v 3 3v 4 v 5 3v 6 v 7 3v 8 + 2v 2 + 2v 3 + 2v 5 + 2v 6 ) p y2 24 ( v + 3v 2 v 3 + 3v 4 v 5 + 3v 6 v 7 + 3v 8 + 2v 2 + 2v 3 + 2v 5 + 2v 6 ) p y3 2 (v + v 3 + v 5 + v 7 + v 2 + v 3 + v 5 + v 6 )

y y x x (a) (b) y y x x (c) (d) Figure : 2D parametric plots of possible xy motion generated by combinations of oscillatory elementary solutions, which determine three separate modes of the system. Paths (a) - (c) correspond to orbits generated by solutions v - v 8 (double arrows indicate direction of motion), while path (d) represents the mode generated by v 5 and v 6. 2

References [] A. M. Perelomov. Integrable Systems Of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras, volume I. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 990. [2] Herbert Goldstein. Classical Mechanics. Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CA, 3rd edition, 2002. 3