d 2 Area i K i0 ν 0 (S.2) d 3 x t 0ν

Similar documents
d 2 Area i K i0 ν 0 (S.2) when the integral is taken over the whole space, hence the second eq. (1.12).

Problem 1(a): As discussed in class, Euler Lagrange equations for charged fields can be written in a manifestly covariant form as L (D µ φ) L

Problem 1(a): As discussed in class, Euler Lagrange equations for charged fields can be written in a manifestly covariant form as L (D µ φ) L

Problem 1(a): At equal times or in the Schrödinger picture the quantum scalar fields ˆΦ a (x) and ˆΠ a (x) satisfy commutation relations

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

Bypassing no-go theorems for consistent interactions in gauge theories

set is not closed under matrix [ multiplication, ] and does not form a group.

September 13 Homework Solutions

Conservation Laws and Poynting

Lecture 13 - Linking E, ϕ, and ρ

Problem 1(a): In N N matrix form, the local SU(N) symmetry acts on the adjoint matter field Φ(x) and the gauge field A µ (x) according to

Lecture 10 :Kac-Moody algebras

Lecture 2e Orthogonal Complement (pages )

Homework Assignment 3 Solution Set

Chapter 14. Matrix Representations of Linear Transformations

Frame-like gauge invariant formulation for mixed symmetry fermionic fields

Week 10: Line Integrals

Chapter 4 Contravariance, Covariance, and Spacetime Diagrams

The Dirichlet Problem in a Two Dimensional Rectangle. Section 13.5

Bernoulli Numbers Jeff Morton

Review of Gaussian Quadrature method

4 The dynamical FRW universe

Torsion free biconformal spaces: Reducing the torsion field equations

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

Electromagnetism Notes, NYU Spring 2018

1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata

1.9 C 2 inner variations

Problem Set 3 Solutions

I1 = I2 I1 = I2 + I3 I1 + I2 = I3 + I4 I 3

Parse trees, ambiguity, and Chomsky normal form

Recitation 3: More Applications of the Derivative

dx dt dy = G(t, x, y), dt where the functions are defined on I Ω, and are locally Lipschitz w.r.t. variable (x, y) Ω.

How do we solve these things, especially when they get complicated? How do we know when a system has a solution, and when is it unique?

Bases for Vector Spaces

GAUGE THEORY ON A SPACE-TIME WITH TORSION

Coalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata

Lecture 2: January 27

Fierz transformations

Convex Sets and Functions

Problem 1(a): In N N matrix form, the local SU(N) symmetry acts on the adjoint matter field Φ(x) and the gauge field A µ (x) according to

Waveguide Guide: A and V. Ross L. Spencer

Some basic concepts of fluid dynamics derived from ECE theory

Today in Physics 122: work, energy and potential in electrostatics

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Summary: Method of Separation of Variables

Classical Mechanics. From Molecular to Con/nuum Physics I WS 11/12 Emiliano Ippoli/ October, 2011

Section 4: Integration ECO4112F 2011

Conducting Ellipsoid and Circular Disk

Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals

2. VECTORS AND MATRICES IN 3 DIMENSIONS

Green s functions. f(t) =

Green function and Eigenfunctions

Chern Simons D = 3, N = 6 superfield theory

MATH 174A: PROBLEM SET 5. Suggested Solution

Linear Systems with Constant Coefficients

Chapter 9 Many Electron Atoms

10 Vector Integral Calculus

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

CIRCULAR COLOURING THE PLANE

g i fφdx dx = x i i=1 is a Hilbert space. We shall, henceforth, abuse notation and write g i f(x) = f

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

Homework 3 Solutions

Homework Assignment 6 Solution Set

7. Indefinite Integrals

Heat flux and total heat

Lecture 3. In this lecture, we will discuss algorithms for solving systems of linear equations.

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

Homework # 4 Solution Key

Quadratic Forms. Quadratic Forms

Improper Integrals. The First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, as we ve discussed in class, goes as follows:

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

u(t)dt + i a f(t)dt f(t) dt b f(t) dt (2) With this preliminary step in place, we are ready to define integration on a general curve in C.

Physics 1402: Lecture 7 Today s Agenda

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

DEFINITION The inner product of two functions f 1 and f 2 on an interval [a, b] is the number. ( f 1, f 2 ) b DEFINITION 11.1.

Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations

Chapter 5. , r = r 1 r 2 (1) µ = m 1 m 2. r, r 2 = R µ m 2. R(m 1 + m 2 ) + m 2 r = r 1. m 2. r = r 1. R + µ m 1

Gravitational scattering of a quantum particle and the privileged coordinate system

Candidates must show on each answer book the type of calculator used.

AMATH 731: Applied Functional Analysis Fall Additional notes on Fréchet derivatives

State Minimization for DFAs

Torsion in Groups of Integral Triangles

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

The Algebra (al-jabr) of Matrices

Energy Bands Energy Bands and Band Gap. Phys463.nb Phenomenon

Notes on length and conformal metrics

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

Plates on elastic foundation

ODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution

2.4 Linear Inequalities and Interval Notation

Numerical integration

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Hints for Exercise 1 on: Current and Resistance

Things to Memorize: A Partial List. January 27, 2017

440-2 Geometry/Topology: Differentiable Manifolds Northwestern University Solutions of Practice Problems for Final Exam

MAA 4212 Improper Integrals

Infinite Geometric Series

221B Lecture Notes WKB Method

Conservation Law. Chapter Goal. 5.2 Theory

The Bernoulli Numbers John C. Baez, December 23, x k. x e x 1 = n 0. B k n = n 2 (n + 1) 2

Transcription:

PHY 396 K. Solutions for prolem set #. Prolem 1: Let T µν = λ K λµ ν. Regrdless of the specific form of the K λµ ν φ, φ tensor, its ntisymmetry with respect to its first two indices K λµ ν K µλ ν implies µ T µν = µ λ K λµ ν = 0 S.1 nd hence µ T µν = µ T µν Noether = hopefully = 0. 3. Furthermore, d 3 x T 0ν = i K i0 ν = d Are i K i0 ν 0 S. oundry of spce when the integrl is tken over the whole spce, hence P ν net d 3 x T 0ν = d 3 x t 0ν Noether. 3. Prolem 1: In the Noether s formul 1 for the stress-energy tensor, φ stnd for the independent fields, however leled. In the electromgnetic cse, the independent fields re components of the 4 vector A λ x, hence T µν Noether EM = µ A λ ν A λ g µν L = F µλ ν A λ + 1 4 gµν F κλ F κλ. S.3 While the second term here is clerly oth guge invrint nd symmetric in µ ν, the first term is neither. 1

Prolem 1c: Clerly, one cn esily restore oth symmetry nd guge invrince of the electromgnetic stress-energy tensor y replcing ν A λ in eq. S.3 with F ν λ, hence eq. 5. The correction to the T muν Noether mounts to T µν = T µν phys T µν Noether = F µλ F ν λ + F µλ ν A λ = F µλ F ν λ ν A λ = +F µλ λ A ν = λ F µλ A ν A ν λ F µλ. S.4 On the ottom line here, the second term vnishes for the free EM field, which stisfies λ F µλ = 0. The remining first term hs the form of totl derivtive of 3-index tensor F µλ A ν which is ntisymmetric in the first two indices; in nother words, it hs the requisite form of λ K λµν. Altogether, we hve T µν phys = T µν Noether + λk λµν where K λµν = F µλ A ν = K µλν S.5 in perfect greement with eq.. Prolem 1d: Let s strt with the Lgrngin 4. In component form, F i0 = F 0i = E i, F ij = ɛ ijk B k. S.6 Therefore, F i0 F i0 = F 0i F 0i = E i E i where the minus sign comes from rising one spce index. Likewise, F ij F ij = +ɛ ijk B k ɛ ijl B l = +B k B k where the plus sign comes from rising two spce indices t once. Thus, L = 1 4 F µν F µν = F i0 F i0 + F 0i F 0i + F ij F ij = 1 E B. S.7 Now let s work out the stress-energy tensor 4 in components. For the energy density component T 00, we hve U T 00 = F 0i F 0 i L = +E 1 E B = 1 E + B S.8 in greement with the stndrd electromgnetic formulæ in the rtionlized c = 1 units.

Likewise, the energy flux nd the momentum density re S i T i0 = T 0i = F 0j F i j = E j +ɛ ijk B k = +ɛ ijk E j B k = E B i, S.9 in greement with the Poynting vector S = E B gin, in the rtionlized c = 1 units. Finlly, the 3 dimensionl stress tensor is T ij EM = F iλ F j λ gij L = F i0 F j 0 F ik F j k + δij L = E i E j + ɛ ikl B l ɛ jkm B m + 1 δij E B = E i E j + δ ij B l B l B i B j + 1 δij E B S.10 Note the nisotropy of this stress tensor. Prolem 1e: = E i E j B i B j + 1 δij E + B. In sense, eq. 7 follows from eq. S.4, ut it is just s esy to derive it directly from the Mxwell equtions. Strting with eq. 4, we immeditely hve µ T µν EM = µ F µλ F ν λ F µλ µ F ν λ + 1 F κλ ν F κλ. S.11 Let s simplify the second term here: F µλ µ F ν λ = F µλ µ F ν λ exchnging summtion indices µ λ = F λµ λ F νµ = +F µλ λ F νµ S.1 = + 1 F µλ λ F νµ 1 F µλ µ F ν λ = + 1 F µλ λ F νµ + µ F λν = 1 F µλ ν F µλ, where the lst line here follows from the homogeneous Mxwell eqution λ F νµ + µ F λν + ν F µλ = 0. S.13 Thnks to eq. S.1, the second term in eq. S.11 cncels the third term, nd we re left 3

with the first term only. Thus, µ T µν EM = µ F µλ F ν λ = Jλ F ν λ S.14 where the second equlity comes from the in-homogeneous Mxwell eqution µ F µλ = J λ. This proves eq. 7. Finlly, eq. 8 follows from eq. 7 nd the net stress-energy conservtion 6. Q.E.D. Prolem 1f: For ν = 0, on the LHS of eq. 7 we hve µ T µ0 = 0 T 00 + i T i0 = U t + S, S.15 while on the RHS of eq. 7 we hve J λ F 0λ = +J i F 0i = J E. S.16 Thus, eq. 7 for ν = 0 is the Poynting theorem U t + S = J E, S.17 which is the locl form of the work-energy theorem for the EM fields: The rte of the EM energy s non-conservtion is equl to the power expended y the EM forces on the electric current J. Now consider eq. 7 for ν = i = 1,, 3. On the LHS, we hve µ T µi = 0 T 0i + j T ji = Si t + j T ji, S.18 which is the locl non-conservtion of the i th component of the EM momentum. Indeed, the Poynting vector S = E B gives not only the flux of the EM energy ut lso the density of the EM momentum, while the stress-tensor T ij gives the flux of the EM momentum. 4

Physiclly, this non-conservtion is due to mechnicl forces etween the EM fields nd the currents, so we should hve S i t + j T ji = f i, S.19 where f is the density of the net EM forces on the chrges nd the currents, f = ρe + J B. S.0 And indeed, on the RHS of eq. 7 for ν = i we hve J λ F iλ = J 0 F i0 + J j F ij = ρe i ɛ ijk J k B k = ρe + J B i = f i, S.1 in perfect greement with eq. S.19. In other words, the ν = 1,, 3 components of eq. 7 give the locl form of the momentum-impulse theorem for the EM field. Prolem : As discussed in clss, Euler Lgrnge equtions for the chrged fields cn e written in mnifestly covrint form s In prticulrly, for φ = Φ, we hve D µ D µ φ φ = 0. S. D µ Φ = Dµ Φ, Φ = m Φ, which gives us D µ D µ Φ + m Φ = 0. S.3 Likewise, for φ = Φ we hve D µ Φ = Dµ Φ, Φ = m Φ, nd therefore D µ D µ Φ + m Φ = 0. S.4 As for the vector fields A ν, the Lgrngin 9 depends on µ A ν only through F µν, which 5

gives us the usul Mxwell eqution µ F µν = J ν where J ν A ν. S.5 To otin the current J ν, we notice tht the covrint derivtives of the chrged fields Φ nd Φ depend on the guge field: D µ Φ A ν = iqδ ν µφ, D µ Φ A ν = iqδ ν µφ. S.6 Consequently, J ν = D ν Φ iqφ D ν Φ iqφ = iqφ D ν Φ + iqφ D ν Φ. S.7 Note tht ll derivtives on the lst line here re guge-covrint, which mkes the current J ν guge invrint. In the non-covrint form, J ν = iqφ D ν Φ iqφd ν Φ q Φ Φ A ν. S.8 To prove the conservtion of this current, we use the Leiniz rule for the covrint derivtives, D ν XY = XD ν Y + Y D ν X. This gives us µ Φ D µ Φ = D µ Φ D µ Φ = D µ Φ D µ Φ + Φ D µ D µ Φ, µ ΦD µ Φ = D µ ΦD µ Φ = D µ ΦD µ Φ + Φ D µ D µ Φ, S.9 nd hence in light of eq. S.7 for the current, νj ν = iq D ν ΦD ν Φ + ΦD ν D ν Φ = iqφ D Φ iqφ D Φ + iq D ν Φ D ν Φ + Φ D ν D ν Φ Q.E.D. y equtions of motion = iqφ m Φ iqφ m Φ = 0. S.30 6

Prolem : According to the Noether theorem, where T µν Noether = µ A λ ν A λ + µ Φ ν Φ + = T µν µν Noether EM + T Noether mtter µ Φ ν Φ g µν L S.31 similr to the free EM fields, nd T µν Noether EM = F µλ ν A λ + 1 4 gµν F κλ F κλ S.3 T µν Noether mtter = Dµ Φ ν Φ + D µ Φ ν Φ g µν D λ Φ D λ Φ m Φ Φ. S.33 Both terms on the second line of eq. S.31 lck µ ν symmetry nd guge invrince nd thus need λ K λµν corrections for some K λµν = K µλν. We would like to show tht the sme K λµν = F µλ A ν we used to improve the free electromgnetic stress-energy tensor will now improve oth the T µν µν EM nd T mt t the sme time! Indeed, to improve the sclr fields stress-energy tensor we need T µν mtter T µν µν phys mtter T Noether mtter = D µ Φ D ν Φ ν Φ + D µ ΦD ν Φ ν Φ = D µ Φ iqa ν Φ + D µ Φ iqa ν Φ = A ν iqφ D µ Φ iqφd µ Φ S.34 = A ν J µ, while the improvement of the EM stress-energy ws worked out in prolem 1.c: T µν EM = F µλ F ν λ ν A λ = +F µλ λ A ν = λ F λµ A ν + A ν J µ, S.35 cf. eq. S.4. Note tht the A ν J µ term cncels etween the EM nd the mtter improvement terms, so the net improvement needed to symmetrize the comined stress-energy tensor is 7

simply Q.E.D. T µν tot T µν µν phys totl T Noether totl = T µν mtter + T µν EM = λ F λµ A ν K λµν. S.36 Prolem c: Becuse the fields Φx nd Φ x hve opposite electric chrges, their product is neutrl nd therefore µ Φ Φ = D µ Φ Φ = D µ Φ Φ + Φ D µ Φ. Similrly, µ D µ Φ D ν Φ = D µ D µ Φ D ν Φ + D µ Φ D µ D ν Φ = m Φ D ν Φ + D µ Φ D ν D µ Φ + iqf µν Φ S.37 where we hve pplied the field eqution D µ D µ + m Φ x = 0 to the first term on the right hnd side nd used [D µ, D ν ]Φ = iqf µν Φ to expnd the second term. Likewise, µ D µ Φ D ν Φ = D µ D µ Φ D ν Φ + D µ Φ D µ D ν Φ = m Φ D ν Φ + D µ Φ D ν D µ Φ iqf µν Φ S.38 nd µ [ g ] µν D λ Φ D λ Φ m Φ Φ = ν D λ Φ D λ Φ + m ν Φ Φ = D ν D µ Φ D µ Φ D µ Φ D ν D µ Φ + m Φ D ν Φ + m Φ D ν Φ. S.39 Together, the left hnd sides of eqs. S.37, S.38 nd S.39 comprise µ T µν mt cf. eq. 7. On the other hnd, totlling up the right hnd sides of these three equtions results in mssive cncelltion of ll terms except those contining the guge field strength tensor F µν. Therefore, µ T µν mt = D µ Φ iqf µν Φ + D µ Φ iqf µν Φ + mssive cncelltion = F µν iqφ D µ Φ iqφ D µ Φ S.40 = F µν J µ = +F νλ J λ in ccordnce with eq. 17. 8

Finlly, comining this formul with eq. 7 we see tht the it follows tht the totl stress-energy tensor 1 is conserved, µ T µν tot = µ T µν tot + µ T µν EM = 0. S.41 Q.E.D. Prolem 3: Unitry trnsform 17 of the Φ fields into ech other leves the iliner comintion Φ Φ invrint which immeditely leds to the invrince of the sclr potentil in the Lgrngin 16. Indeed, unitry mtrix U stisfies U U = 1 i.e., U U c = δc nd hence Φ Φ = =,c Φ U U cφ c c Φ Φc U U c = δc = Φ Φ. S.4 Similrly, the kinetic prt of the Lgrngin would e invrint provided the derivtives D µ Φ nd D µ Φ trnsform into ech other just like the fields itself, D µ Φ U D µφ & D µ Φ D µ Φ U D µ Φ D µ Φ S.43 D µ Φ D µ Φ : invrint. Thus, ll we need to prove is the ssumptions on the top line here, or equivlently, tht the covrint derivtives D µ commute with the unitry trnsform 17. For glol symmetry, the U mtrix is x-independent, thus µ U = 0 which mkes the symmetry trnsform commute with the ordinry derivtives µ. To commute with the covrint derivtives D µ = µ + ia µ x ˆQ, S.44 the symmetry trnsform should lso commute with the electric chrge opertor Q. In other words, it should not mix fields hving different electric chrges. 9

For the prolem t hnd, ll the Φ fields hve the sme chrge +q while ll the conjugte fields Φ hve the opposite chrge q. Thus, symmetry my mix Φ field with ny other Φ fields s in eq. 17 ut not with ny of the Φ conjugte fields. Likewise, it my mix Φ with the other Φ ut now with ny of the Φ. Prolem 3: Consider n infinitesiml unitry symmetry U = 1 + iɛt + Oɛ for some hermitin mtrix T = T. The genertor T of this symmetry cts on the fields s δφ = ɛtφ = ɛ it Φ, δφ = ɛtφ = ɛ iφ T, S.45 so the Noether current of this symmetry is J µ T = µ Φ TΦ + µ Φ TΦ = D µ Φ it Φ + D µ Φ iφ T = T iφ D µ Φ iφ D µ Φ S.46 = T J µ tr T J µ. where J µ is the hermitin mtrix of currents J µ = iφ D µ Φ iφ D µ Φ = J µ. 18 Note: different hermitin mtrix T would generte different infinitesiml unitry symmetry U = 1 + iɛt, which in term would hve different Noether current J µ T = tr T J µ. However, ll such currents re liner comintions of the sme N currents J µ, nd there is ovious liner reltion etween prticulr hermitin genertor T nd the corresponding Noether current J T. Consequently, the whole mtrix J µ = J µ cts s mtrix of Noether currents of the UN symmetry. 10

Prolem 3c: Since the product Φ D µ Φ is electriclly neutrl, we hve µ Φ D µ Φ = D µ Φ D µ Φ = D µ Φ D µ Φ + Φ D µ D µ Φ, S.47 nd likewise µ Φ Dµ Φ = D µ Φ Dµ Φ = D µ Φ D µ Φ + Φ Dµ D µ Φ. S.48 Consequently µ Φ D µ Φ Φ Dµ Φ = Φ D µ D µ Φ Φ Dµ D µ Φ S.49 while the remining terms in eqs. S.47 nd S.48 cncel ech other, which mens µ J µ = iφ D µ D µ Φ iφ Dµ D µ Φ. S.50 Moreover, when the sclr fields oey their equtions of motion D µ D µ Φ D µ D µ Φ = V Φ = Φ m + λ Φ, = V Φ = Φ m + λ Φ, S.51 the right hnd sides of eqs. S.50 vnish ltogether nd the Noether currents 18 re conserved: µ J µ Q.E.D. = iφ D µ D µ Φ iφ Dµ D µ Φ = iφ Φ m + λ Φ = 0. iφ Φ m + λ Φ S.5 11

Prolem 3d: N complex fields Φ x re equivlent to N rel fields φ,α x for = 1,..., N nd α = 1, : Φ x = φ 1x + iφ x, Φ x = φ 1x iφ x. S.53 The sclr potentil prt of the Lgrngin 16 is function of Φ Φ = φ 1 + φ = 1,α φ,α S.54 so it is invrint under ny SON rottion of the N rel fields. For electriclly neutrl fields, the net kinetic prt of the Lgrngin L kinetic neutrl = µ Φ µ Φ =,α 1 µ φ,α S.55 would lso e invrint under ny SON symmetry s long s the trnsformtions re glol, i.e., x independent, ut for the electriclly chrged fields the sitution is more complicted. Indeed, for chrged field Φ, the guge-covrint kinetic term D µ Φ D µ Φ comprises oth the kinetic terms per se ut lso the coupling of the chrged field to the EM fields A µ : D µ Φ D µ Φ = µ Φ iqa µ Φ µ Φ + iqa µ Φ = µ Φ µ Φ + iqa µ Φ µ Φ Φ µ Φ + q A µ A µ Φ Φ. S.56 In terms of the two rel fields φ α comprising the complex field Φ, this formul ecomes D µ Φ D µ Φ = 1 µφ 1 + 1 µφ + qa µ φ µ φ 1 φ 1 µ φ + 1 q A µ A µ φ 1 1 + φ. S.57 Consequently, for the N rel fields comprising the N complex fields of similr electric chrge 1

we hve L kinetic chrged = D µ Φ D µ Φ = 1,α µ φ,α qa µ where E αβ is ntisymmetric mtrix E αβ φ,α µ φ,β + 1 q A µ A µ α,β,α φ,α S.58 E = 0 +1 1 0, tht is E 11 = E = 0, E 1 = +1, E 1 = 1. S.59 Clerly, the first nd the third sums on the second line of eq. S.58 re invrint under ny SUN rottion of the N rel fields, ut the second sum is more finicky it is invrint only under rottions tht preserve the E mtrix, or rther the N N ntisymmetric mtrix 0N N +1 N N E = E 1 N N = S.60 1 N N 0 N N Thus, due to the coupling of the N chrged fields to the EM fields A µ, the Lgrngin 16 does not hve glol SON symmetry; insted, the symmetries re limited to the sugroup of SON tht preserves the E mtrix. Tht sugroup hppens to e equivlent to UN. This mye hrd to see in the lnguge of N rel fields, ut it ecomes ovious once we go ck to complex fields tht hve definite electric chrges +q for ll the Φ nd q for ll the Φ. In this sis, good symmetries should commute with the electric chrge opertors, so they should not mix the Φ nd Φ fields with ech other. On the other hnd, ny complex-liner mixing of the Φ with ech other nd of the Φ with ech other is OK. As we sw in prt, the symmetry group stisfying this condition in ddition to preserving the Φ is the unitry group UN. 13

Prolem 3e: Suppose n infinitesiml SON trnsform 19 were symmetry of the theory. Then the Noether current for this symmetry would e J µ C = µ Φ = Dµ Φ C Φ = C Φ D µ Φ + C Φ Dµ Φ, C Iµ + C I µ = 1 + µ Φ = Dµ Φ C Φ = 1 tr C I µ + 1 tr CI µ S.61 where I µ is the complex ntisymmetric mtrix of currents I µ = Φ D µ Φ Φ D µ Φ = I µ S.6 nd I µ is similr ntisymmetric mtrix of the complex conjugte currents I µ = Φ Dµ Φ Φ D µ Φ = I µ. S.63 These current re electriclly chrged the I µ hve chrge +q while the I µ q so let s tke their covrint divergences hve chrge D µ I µ = µ I µ + iqa µ I µ nd D µ I µ = µ I µ iqa µ I µ. S.64 Using the Leiniz rules for the D µ, we hve D µ I µ = D µ Φ D µ Φ + Φ D µ D µ Φ = Φ D µ D µ Φ Φ D µ D µ Φ y equtions of motion = Φ m λ Φ Φ Φ m λ Φ Φ S.65 = 0, nd likewise D µ I µ = 0. In light of eqs. S.64 this mens tht the ordinry non-covrint 14

divergences of these currents do not vnish; insted µ I µ = iqa µ I µ 0, µ I µ = +iqa µ I µ 0. Therefore, the corresponding chrges Q = Q = d 3 xi 0 nd Q = Q conserved. S.66 re not 15