Hermite functions. Jordan Bell Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto. September 9, 2015

Similar documents
Gaussian Hilbert spaces

Bernstein s inequality and Nikolsky s inequality for R d

Solutions: Problem Set 3 Math 201B, Winter 2007

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

MAT 578 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS EXERCISES

The heat equation for the Hermite operator on the Heisenberg group

LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces

The Schwartz Space: Tools for Quantum Mechanics and Infinite Dimensional Analysis

Vectors in Function Spaces

Functional Analysis I

Chapter 1. Preliminaries. The purpose of this chapter is to provide some basic background information. Linear Space. Hilbert Space.

1 Functional Analysis

Functional Analysis Review

Fourier Series. 1. Review of Linear Algebra

Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces

HERMITE MULTIPLIERS AND PSEUDO-MULTIPLIERS

The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals

Errata Applied Analysis

Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis

Heisenberg s inequality

AN ESTIMATE FOR BOUNDED SOLUTIONS OF THE HERMITE HEAT EQUATION

Fourier transforms, I

The Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem

Introduction to Microlocal Analysis

David Hilbert was old and partly deaf in the nineteen thirties. Yet being a diligent

The Lindeberg central limit theorem

Inner products. Theorem (basic properties): Given vectors u, v, w in an inner product space V, and a scalar k, the following properties hold:

MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications

This ODE arises in many physical systems that we shall investigate. + ( + 1)u = 0. (λ + s)x λ + s + ( + 1) a λ. (s + 1)(s + 2) a 0

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd Edition, W.Rudin Elementary Hilbert Space Theory

Wave packet decompositions adapted to (non-self-adjoint) operators

Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels

Math 172 Problem Set 8 Solutions

TOOLS FROM HARMONIC ANALYSIS

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by

SZEGÖ ASYMPTOTICS OF EXTREMAL POLYNOMIALS ON THE SEGMENT [ 1, +1]: THE CASE OF A MEASURE WITH FINITE DISCRETE PART

Fourier Series. ,..., e ixn ). Conversely, each 2π-periodic function φ : R n C induces a unique φ : T n C for which φ(e ix 1

1 Fourier Integrals on L 2 (R) and L 1 (R).

Hilbert spaces. 1. Cauchy-Schwarz-Bunyakowsky inequality

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

Compact operators on Banach spaces

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES FOR THE FOCK SPACE

Linear Analysis Lecture 5

Differentiation and function spaces

13. Fourier transforms

j=1 [We will show that the triangle inequality holds for each p-norm in Chapter 3 Section 6.] The 1-norm is A F = tr(a H A).

Another consequence of the Cauchy Schwarz inequality is the continuity of the inner product.

Benjamin-Ono equation: Lax pair and simplicity of eigenvalues

1 Fourier Integrals of finite measures.

MATH 5640: Fourier Series

Oscillatory integrals

CHAPTER 4. Applications

Outline of Fourier Series: Math 201B

II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R)

SOLUTIONS TO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4

Partial Differential Equations

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi The Fourier Transform

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

2 Infinite products and existence of compactly supported φ

Real Analysis Problems

Elements of Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)

Real Analysis Chapter 8 Solutions Jonathan Conder. = lim n. = lim. f(z) dz dy. m(b r (y)) B r(y) f(z + x y) dz. B r(y) τ y x f(z) f(z) dz

MATH 220: INNER PRODUCT SPACES, SYMMETRIC OPERATORS, ORTHOGONALITY

Lecture I: Asymptotics for large GUE random matrices

1. If 1, ω, ω 2, -----, ω 9 are the 10 th roots of unity, then (1 + ω) (1 + ω 2 ) (1 + ω 9 ) is A) 1 B) 1 C) 10 D) 0

Problem 1A. Suppose that f is a continuous real function on [0, 1]. Prove that

Analytic families of multilinear operators

Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 1: The Fourier transform

FOURIER TRANSFORMS. 1. Fourier series 1.1. The trigonometric system. The sequence of functions

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

Starting from Heat Equation

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

FRAMES AND TIME-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

be the set of complex valued 2π-periodic functions f on R such that

Continuous Functions on Metric Spaces

Orthonormal series expansion and finite spherical Hankel transform of generalized functions

Math Linear Algebra II. 1. Inner Products and Norms

The following definition is fundamental.

Functional Analysis Review

Sobolevology. 1. Definitions and Notation. When α = 1 this seminorm is the same as the Lipschitz constant of the function f. 2.

MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA

Projection Theorem 1

Best approximation in the 2-norm

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ap] 3 Oct 2006

x 3y 2z = 6 1.2) 2x 4y 3z = 8 3x + 6y + 8z = 5 x + 3y 2z + 5t = 4 1.5) 2x + 8y z + 9t = 9 3x + 5y 12z + 17t = 7

Linear Independence of Finite Gabor Systems

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

Prof. M. Saha Professor of Mathematics The University of Burdwan West Bengal, India

Transcription:

Hermite functions Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto September 9, 25 Locally convex spaces If V is a vector space and {p α : α A} is a separating family of seminorms on V, then there is a unique topology with which V is a locally convex space and such that the collection of finite intersections of sets of the form {v V : p α (v < ɛ}, α A, ɛ > is a local base at. We call this the topology induced by the family of seminorms. If {p n : n } is a separating family of seminorms, then d(v, w = 2 n p n (v w, v, w V, + p n (v w is a metric on V that induces the same topology as the family of seminorms. If d is a complete metric, then V is called a Fréchet space. 2 Schwartz functions For φ C (, C and n, let p n (φ = sup k n u sup( + u 2 n/2 φ (k (u. We define S to be the set of those φ C (, C such that p n (φ < for all n. S is a complex vector space and each p n is a norm, and because each p n is a norm, a fortiori {p n : n } is a separating family of seminorms. With the topology induced by this family of seminorms, S is a Fréchet space. 2 As well, D : S S defined by (Dφ(x = φ (x, x http://individual.utoronto.ca/jordanbell/notes/holomorphic.pdf, Theorem and Theorem 4. 2 Walter udin, Functional Analysis, second ed., p. 84, Theorem 7.4.

and M : S S defined by (Mφ(x = xφ(x, x are continuous linear maps. 3 Hermite functions Let λ be Lebesgue measure on and let (f, g L 2 = fgdλ. With this inner product, L 2 (λ is a separable Hilbert space. We write f 2 L = (f, f 2 L 2 = f 2 dλ. For n, define H n : by H n (x = ( n e x2 D n e x2, which is a polynomial of degree n. H n are called Hermite polynomials. It can be shown that For m, n, exp(2zx z 2 = For n, define h n : by n! H n(xz n, z C. ( H m (xh n (xe x2 dλ(x = 2 n n! πδ m,n. h n (x = (2 n n! π /2 e x2 /2 H n (x = ( n (2 n n! π /2 e x2 /2 D n e x2. h n are called Hermite functions. Then for m, n, (h m, h n L 2 = h m (xh n (xdλ(x = δ m,n. One proves that {h n : n } is an orthonormal basis for (L 2 (λ, (, L 2. 3 We remind ourselves that for x, 4 5. e x2 = 2 π /2 e y2 /4 e ixy dy, 3 http://individual.utoronto.ca/jordanbell/notes/gaussian.pdf, Theorem 8. 4 http://individual.utoronto.ca/jordanbell/notes/completelymonotone.pdf, Lemma 2

and by the dominated convergence theorem this yields D n e x2 = 2 π /2 ( iy n e y2 /4 e ixy dy, and so h n (x = (2 n n! π /2 e x2 /2 2 π /2 4 Mehler s formula We now prove Mehler s formula for the Hermite functions. 5 (iy n e y2 /4 e ixy dy. (2 Theorem (Mehler s formula. For z C with z < and for x, y, h n (xh n (yz n = π /2 ( z 2 /2 2 + z2 exp ( z 2 (x2 + y 2 + 2z z 2 xy. Proof. Using (2, = h n (xh n (yz n ( ( π 2 2 n n! e(x +y 2 /2 z n (2πiξ n e π2 ξ 2 e 2πixξ dξ (2πiζ n e π2 ζ 2 e 2πiyζ dζ = πe (x2 +y 2 /2 e π2 ξ 2 π 2 ζ 2 2πixξ 2πiζy ( 2π 2 ξζz n dξdζ n! = πe (x2 +y 2 /2 e π2 ξ 2 π 2 ζ 2 2πixξ 2πiζy e 2π2ξζz dξdζ. Now, writing a = iy π + ξz, we calculate e π2 ζ 2 2πiζy 2π 2 ξζz dζ = e π2 (ζ+a 2 +π 2 a 2 dζ = π e π2 a 2 = π exp ( y 2 + 2πiyξz + π 2 ξ 2 z 2. 5 Sundaram Thangavelu, An Introduction to the Uncertainty Principle: Hardy s Theorem on Lie Groups, p. 8, Proposition.2.. 3

Then, for α = ( z 2 π 2, h n (xh n (yz n =e (x2 +y 2 /2 =e (x2 y 2 /2 =e (x2 y 2 /2 e π2 ξ 2 2πixξ y 2 +2πiyξz+π 2 ξ 2 z 2 dξ e αξ2 2πi(x yzξ dξ π α exp ( π2 (x yz2 α ( =π /2 e (x2 y 2 /2 ( z 2 /2 exp =π /2 ( z 2 /2 exp ( x2 ( =π /2 ( z 2 /2 exp (x yz2 z 2 z 2 + 2xyz z 2 y2 z 2 z 2 + x2 2 y2 2 + z 2 2 z 2 (x2 + y 2 + 2z z 2 xy. 5 The Hermite operator We define A : S S by, (Aφ(x = φ (x + (x 2 + φ(x, x, A = D 2 + M 2 +, which is a continuous linear map S S, which we call the Hermite operator. S is a dense linear subspace of the Hilbert space L 2 (λ, and A : S S is a linear map, so A is a densely defined operator in L 2 (λ. For φ, ψ S, integrating by parts, (Aφ, ψ L 2 = ( φ (x + (x 2 + φ(xψ(xdλ(x = φ (xψ(xdλ(x + (x 2 + φ(xψ(xdλ(x = φ(xψ (xdλ(x + (x 2 + φ(xψ(xdλ(x = (φ, Aψ L 2, showing that A : S S is symmetric. Furthermore, also integrating by parts, (Aφ, φ L 2 = (φ (xφ (x + (x 2 + φ(xφ(xdλ(x, 4

so A is a positive operator. It is straightforward to check that each h n belongs to S. For n, we calculate that h n(x + (2n + x 2 h n (x =, and hence (Ah n (x = (2n + x 2 h n (x + x 2 h n (x + h n (x = (2n + 2h n (x, Ah n = (2n + 2h n. Therefore, for each h n, A h n = 2n+2 h n, and it follows that there is a unique bounded linear operator T : L 2 (λ L 2 (λ such that 6 The operator norm of T is T h n = A h n = (2n + 2 h n, n. (3 T = sup n 2n + 2 = 2. The Hermite functions are an orthonormal basis for L 2 (λ, so for f L 2 (λ, f = (f, h n L 2h n. For f, g L 2 (λ, ( (T f, g L 2 = (f, h n L 2T h n, (g, h n L 2h n ( = (f, h n L 2(2n + 2 h n, (g, h n L 2h n = (2n + 2 (f, h n L 2(g, h n L 2, from which it is immediate that T is self-adjoint. For p, T p h n 2 L 2 = (2n + 2 p h n 2 L 2 = (2n + 2 2p h n 2 L 2 = (2n + 2 2p. Therefore for p, T p h n 2 L = (2n + 2 2p = 2 2p m 2p = 2 2p ζ(2p. 2 This means that for p, T p is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with Hilbert- Schmidt norm 7 T p HS = 2 p ζ(2p. m= 6 http://individual.utoronto.ca/jordanbell/notes/traceclass.pdf, Theorem. 7 http://individual.utoronto.ca/jordanbell/notes/traceclass.pdf, 7. L 2 L 2 5

6 Creation and annihilation operators Taking the derivative of ( with respect to x gives 2 n! H n(xz n+ = n! H n(xz n, so H = and for n, n! H n(x = (n! 2H n (x, and so H n = 2nH n, h n(x = (2n /2 h n (x xh n (x, Dh n = (2n /2 h n Mh n. Furthermore, from its definition we calculate h n(x = xh n (x (2n + 2 /2 h n+ (x, Dh n = Mh n (2n + 2 /2 h n+. We define B : S S, called the annihilation operator, by (Bφ(x = φ (x + xφ(x, x, B = D + M, which is a continuous linear map S S. For n, we calculate Bh n = (2n /2 h n, and h (x = π /4 e x2 /2, so Bh =. We define C : S S, called the creation operator, by (Cφ(x = φ (x + xφ(x, x, C = D + M, which is a continuous linear map S S. For n, we calculate Thus, For φ S, Furthermore, and Ch n = (2n + 2 /2 h n+. h n = (2 n n! /2 C n h = π /4 (2 n n! /2 C n (e x2 /2. (4 B C = 2D. BC = D 2 + M 2 + = A CB = D 2 + M 2 = A 2. 6

7 The Fourier transform Define F : S S, for φ S, by (F φ(ξ = ˆφ(ξ = φ(xe iξx dx, (2π /2 ξ. For ξ, by the dominated convergence theorem we have in other words, ˆφ(ξ + h lim ˆφ(ξ = ( ixφ(xe iξx dx h h (2π,, /2 xφ(x(ξ = i D ˆφ(ξ = id ˆφ(ξ, F (Mφ = id(f φ. (5 Also, by the dominated convergence theorem we obtain in other words, For φ S, φ(x = Dφ(ξ = iξ ˆφ(ξ, F (Dφ = im(f φ. (6 ˆφ(ξe ixξ dξ, x. (7 (2π /2 φ ˆφ is an isomorphism of locally convex spaces S S. 8 Using (7 and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality φ ( + ξ 2 /2 ( + ξ 2 /2 ˆφ(ξ dξ (2π /2 ( /2 ( /2 (2π /2 ( + ξ 2 dξ ( + ξ 2 ˆφ(ξ 2 dξ ( /2 = 2 /2 ( + ξ 2 dξ ˆφ(ξ 2, and using (6 and the fact that ˆφ L 2 = φ L 2, φ 2 2 ˆφ(ξ 2 dξ + 2 = 2 ˆφ(ξ 2 dξ + 2 = 2 φ 2 L 2 + 2 φ 2 L 2, ξ 2 ˆφ(ξ 2 dξ (F φ (ξ 2 dξ 8 Walter udin, Functional Analysis, second ed., p. 86, Theorem 7.7. 7

and therefore φ 2 /2 ( φ L 2 + φ L 2. (8 We remind ourselves that A = D 2 + M 2 +, B = D + M, C = D + M. Using F D = imf, DF = i F M, we get F A = F ( D 2 + M 2 + = (imf D + (idf M + F = im(imf + id(idf + F = M 2 F D 2 F + F = AF, and and F B = F (D + M = imf + idf = ibf F C = F ( D + M = imf + idf = icf. We now determine the Fourier transform of the Hermite functions. Theorem 2. For n, F h n = ( i n h n. Proof. For n, by induction, from F C = icf we get F C n = ( ic n F. From (4, h n = π /4 (2 n n! /2 C n (e x2 /2. Writing g(x = e x2 /2, it is a fact that F g = g, and using this with the above yields F h n = π /4 (2 n n! /2 F C n g = π /4 (2 n n! /2 ( ic n F g = π /4 (2 n n! /2 ( ic n g = π /4 (2 n n! /2 ( i n π /4 (2 n n! /2 h n = ( i n h n. 8

There is a unique Hilbert space isomorphism F : L 2 (λ L 2 (λ such that F f = ˆf for all f S. 9 For f L 2 (λ, f = (f, h n L 2h n, and then F f = (f, h n L 2F h n = (f, h n L 2( i n h n. 8 Asymptotics For x =, ( reads thus n! H n(z n = exp( z 2 = ( z 2 n, n! H 2n ( = ( n (2n!, H 2n+ ( =. n! Similarly, taking the derivative of ( with respect to x yields H 2n( =, H 2n+( n (2n +! = 2(. n! For u(x = e x2 /2 H n (x, u (x = xu+e x2 /2 H n(x, u (x = u xu xe x2 /2 H n(x+e x2 /2 H n(x. Using we get and thence H n(x = 2xH n (x H n+ (x, H n(x = 2nH n (x H n(x 2xH n(x + 2nH n (x =, u = u + x 2 u 2nu. Thus, writing f(x = x 2 u(x, u satisfies the initial value problem v + (2n + v = f, v( = H n (, v ( = H n(. (9 Now, for λ >, two linearly independent solutions of v +λv = are v (x = cos(λ /2 x and v 2 (x = sin(λ /2 x. The Wronskian of (v, v 2 is W = λ /2, and 9 Walter udin, Functional Analysis, second ed., p. 88, Theorem 7.9. N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 66, 4.4. 9

using variation of parameters, if v satisfies v +λv = g then there are c, c 2 such that v(x = c v + c 2 v 2 + Av + Bv 2, where x A(x = x W v 2(tg(tdt, B(x = W v (tg(tdt. We calculate that the unique solution of the initial value problem v + λv = g, v( = a, v ( = b, is v(x = av (x + bλ /2 v 2 (x λ /2 v (x x v 2 (tg(tdt + λ /2 v 2 (x x v (tg(tdt = a cos(λ /2 x + bλ /2 sin(λ /2 x x + λ /2 (cos(λ /2 t sin(λ /2 x sin(λ /2 t cos(λ /2 xg(tdt x = a cos(λ /2 x + bλ /2 sin(λ /2 x + λ /2 sin(λ /2 (x tg(tdt. Therefore the unique solution of the initial value problem (9 is v(x = H n ( cos((2n + /2 x + H n((2n + /2 sin((2n + /2 x x + (2n + /2 sin((2n + /2 (x t t 2 u(tdt, where u(x = e x2 /2 H n (x. If n = 2k then We calculate v(x = ( k (2k! cos((4k + /2 x k! x + (4k + /2 sin((4k + /2 (x t t 2 u(tdt = ( k (2k! k! cos((4k + /2 x + (4k + /2 r 2k (x. ( ( x x r 2k (x 2 t 4 dt u(t 2 dt x 5 e t2 H 2k (t 2 dt = x 5 22k (2k! π, /4 x 5/2 r 2k (x π 2 k (2k!.

By Stirling s approximation, 2 k (2k! (2k! k! Thus for α 2k = (2k! k!, = 2k k! 2 k (2πk /2 k k e k (2k! ((4πk /2 (2k 2k e 2k = /2 π/4 k /4. r 2k (x α 2k = O( x 5/2 k /4 k /2 = O( x 5/2 k /4. Thangavelu states the following inequality and asymptotics without proof, and refers to Szegő and Muckenhoupt. Lemma 3. There are γ, C, ɛ > such that for N = 2n +, and h n (x C(N /3 + x 2 N /4, x 2 2N Ce γx2, x 2 > 2N, h n (x N /8 (x N /2 /4 e ɛn /4 (x N /2 3/2 for N /2 + N /6 x (2N /2. Lemma 4. For N = 2n +, x N 2 N 6, and θ = arccos(xn 2, h n (x = ( /2 2 (N x 2 /4 cos π ( N(2θ sin θ π Theorem 5.. h n p n 2p 4 for p < 4. 2. h n p n 8 log n for p = 4. 3. h n p n 6p 2 for 4 < p. 4 +O(N /2 (N x 2 7/4. ather than taking the pth power of h n, one can instead take the pth power of H n and integrate this with respect to Gaussian measure. Writing dγ(x = (2π /2 e x2 /2 dx and taking H n to be the Hermite polynomial that is monic, now write H n p p = H n p dγ. Larsson-Cohn 2 proves that for < p < 2 there is an explicit c(p such that H n p = c(p n /4 n!( + O(n, Sundaram Thangavelu, Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expansions, pp. 26 27, Lemma.5. and Lemma.5.2; Gábor Szegő, Orthogonal Polynomials; Benjamin Muckenhoupt, Mean convergence of Hermite and Laguerre series. II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (97, 433 47, Lemma 5. 2 Lars Larsson-Cohn, L p -norms of Hermite polynomials and an extremal problem on Wiener chaos, Ark. Mat. 4 (22, 34 44.

and for 2 < p < there is an explicit c(p such that H n p = c(p n /4 n!(p n/2 ( + O(n. This uses the asymptotic expansion of Plancherel and otach. 3 3 M. Plancherel and W. otach, Sur les valeurs asymptotiques des polynomes d Hermite, Commentarii mathematici Helvetici (929, 227 254. 2